+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Date post: 02-Jan-2017
Category:
Upload: duongdieu
View: 289 times
Download: 12 times
Share this document with a friend
46
CONFIDENTIAL. This document contains trade secret information. Disclosure, use or reproduction outside Cargill or inside Cargill, to or by those employees who do not have a need to know is prohibited except as authorized by Cargill in writing. FMEA Fall Conference November 6th, 2015 www.cargill.com Natural Ester Dielectric Fluids Overview
Transcript
Page 1: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

CONFIDENTIAL. This document contains trade secret information. Disclosure, use or reproduction outside Cargill or inside Cargill, to or by those employees who do not have a need to know is prohibited except as authorized by Cargill in writing.

FMEAFall Conference

November 6th, 2015

www.cargill.com

Natural Ester Dielectric Fluids

Overview

Page 2: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Agenda

•Public Power DEED story•History•Fluid comparison•Natural Ester Fluid

– Fire Safety– Environmental Impact– Longer life– Industry Validation / Testing

•Key takeaways

2

Page 3: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

APPA's American Public Power Association

DEED program-Conceives Natural Ester Revolution

……………and Envirot™ FR3™

3

• Natural Ester transformer placed into service in 1997 by Waverly Power & Light- Iowa.

• Waverly P&L-• Piloted field testing.

• Now nearly 1 million transformers use Natural Esters as part of their insulation system.

A transformer containing the Envirotemp FR3 transformer fluid is pictured in the foreground. Photo courtesy of Waverly Light & Power

Page 4: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Free Breathing Designs

Sealed Designs

Thermally Upgraded

KraftNatural Esters

1880 1900 1930 1960 1990 2010Common failure mode: mineral oil (sludge, a bi-product of oxidation) impacted heat transfer/dissipation

Diagnostics put into practice

2020

High temperature materials standards

Common failure mode: shifted to solid insulation; constrained by operating temperature

Common failure mode: solid insulation; operating temperature increased

85oC AWR, 130oC HST55oC AWR, 95oC HST 65oC AWR, 110oC HST

Common failure mode: solid insulation; operating temperature increased

Transformer history (1890-present)

4

Page 5: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Mineral Oil Natural Ester(FR3 fluid) Synthetic Ester Silicone Oil

Base Fluid Petroleum Oil Vegetable Oil Hydrocarbons Polydimethylsiloxanes

Diagnostic Capability Yes Yes Yes Less

Fire point 160°C 360°C 310°C 340°CBiodegradability Low Ultimately Readily No

Biobased No Yes No No

Oxidation Good Acceptable(non-free breathing)

Very good Very good

Aging Average Best Better AverageInitial Cost $ $$ $$$ $$$

Fluid characteristics impact performance capabilities in transformer application

5

Page 6: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Fluid differences impact performance

6

FluidCharacteristics

Mineral Oil Natural Ester

Transformer performance

65 AWR110ºC hottest spot

85 AWR130ºC hottest spotAllows for overload or life extension

Reliability-dielectric strength

Dielectric strength declines as heat increases due towater saturation

Retains dielectric strength in presence of waterSelf Drying - Hydrolysis “consumes” the water

Moisture saturation (@20°C) – Keep Moisture out of the Paper!

55 ppm 1,100 ppm

Fire safety Flash point 155ºCFire point 160ºC

Flash point 330ºCFire point 360ºC

Environmental footprint

Non-biodegradable Non toxic, non-hazardous in soil and waterCarbon neutral Biodegradable in 28 days

Page 7: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Hottest Spot Temperature 

( )

Average Winding Rise (K)(Top Temp ‐ Bottom 

Temp)/2

Transformer solid insulation is limiting factor in transformer life

• Degrades over time, based upon temperature, loading degree/cycle, and contaminants (water, oxygen, and acids)

Design limits defined by insulation system hot spot temperature (HST)

• Natural Esters (IEEE c57.154) demonstrates 20°C additional thermal capability (compared to mineral oil)

Economic value and opportunity• Natural Ester filled transformers thermal capability

enables lower cost per kVA, longer life, reduced transformer price, and positive NPV

Insulation system is the primary failure mode of a transformer

7

Page 8: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

FR3 fluid Formulation Developed

ASTM Standard Published

Envirotemp Dielectric Fluids Business Purchased by Cargill

19Jun12

FR3 fluid Applied to 1st Transformer

FR3 fluid Commercially Available

IEC Standard Published

IEEE Standard Published

High Temp Insulation System Standards Published

1990

1995

2000

2005

2010

2015DGA Standard Published

Over 20+ years of experience with Natural Esters

Cargill begins FR3 fluid production

8

Page 9: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Increased Safety - Reduces Fire Risk

Improved Environmental Footprint

Optimized Transformer Performance Lower total cost Greater Reliability

Natural Esters:Three important benefits to remember

9

Page 10: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Increased Safety - Reduces Fire Risk

Natural EstersKey Advantages

10

Page 11: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Fire Safety(K class fluid) - UL and FM

No reported fire related failures!11

Page 12: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Fire SafetyFlash and Fire Point of Ester K-Class Fluids » Fluids classified as “Fire Resistant” (K Class) must

have Fire Point above 300°C

150

200

250

300

350

400

Tempe

rature (°C)

MineralOil

Envirotemp200 Synthetic

Silicone Envirotemp FR3 Natural Ester

Flash PointFire Point

308

343360

165155

270300

330

Page 13: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

CONFIDENTIAL. This document contains trade secret information. Disclosure, use or reproduction outside Cargill or inside Cargill, to or by those employees who do not have a need to know is prohibited except as authorized by Cargill in writing.

Safety& Fire Benefits of K Class High Firepoint

• No fires/self extinguishing

• Employees and Stakeholders are safer.

• Discounted insurance

No firewalls needed• Reduced construction $$$$

• No costly sprinkler systems

Smaller footprint

• Reduced separation distances

• Better use of land and retail space

Page 14: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Increased Safety - Reduces Fire Risk

Improved Environmental Footprint

Natural EstersKey Advantages

14

Page 15: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Natural ester fluid is a better choice for the communities you serve

15

• Made from a renewable resource- >98% vegetable oil- Carbon neutral*- Contains no petroleum, halogens, silicones or sulfurs

• Non-toxic, non-hazardous in water and soil- OECD oral and aquatic toxicity test

• Biodegrades in less than 28 days- Ultimately biodegradable according Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

• Recyclable

* According to BEES 4.0 lifecycle analysis

Page 16: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Increased Safety - Reduces Fire Risk

Improved Environmental Footprint

Optimized Transformer Performance Lower total costGreater Reliability

Natural Esters c57.154Key Advantages

16

Page 17: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Optimize performance: Increase capacity with reduced transformer sizeINCREASE LOADABILITY BY UP TO 20% WITHOUT DEGRADING ASSET LIFE

17

• IEEE C57.154 (IEC 60076-14) High temperature insulation system standard− Current standard 110oC hot spot with

65 AWR limits transformer capability

− Envirotemp™ FR3™ fluid-based insulation systems can be run 20oC warmer without degrading life

− Design new transformers smaller with same or more load capability

− Existing transformers can be upgraded to provide overload capability

Page 18: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Improve reliability: Extend insulation and asset life 5-8x longer than mineral oil

18

Protecting life of insulation paper is thenumber one factor that determines asset

life

Page 19: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Tested, validated and proven

19 SPCAA Presentation – May 13, 2014

Page 20: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Validated by industryMeets IEEE and IEC standards

- More than 250 series of tests conducted on FR3 fluid

- IEEE C57.154 (IEC 60076-14) High temperature insulation system standard enables 75 rise new transformer designs

Classified as a less flammable fluid (K-class)

- Underwriters Laboratory - FM Global

Environmental testing- Carbon neutral according to BEES 4.0

lifecycle analysis- Ultimately biodegradable by EPA- Non-toxic and non-hazardous in soil and

water by OECD

Industry recognition- 2013 Presidential Green Chemistry

Award- 2013 EPA Design for the Environment

(DfE) designation- USDA BioPrefered Program- EPA Environmental Technology

Verification California Environmental Technology Certification

- FERC ruling – retrofills with FR3 fluid may be capitalized

20

Page 21: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Natural Esters Mineral OilNew Oil ASTM D6871 ASTM D3487

IEC 62770 IEC 60296

Use and Maintenance IEEE C57.147 IEEE C57.106IEC 60422

Transformers IEEE C57.12.00 IEEE C57.12.00IEC 60076 series IEC 60076 series

IEEE C57.154 IEEE C57.154IEC 60076-14 IEC 60076-14

Loading Guide IEC 60076-7 IEC 60076-7

Dissolved Gases IEEE C57.155 IEEE C57.104IEC 60599

ASTM, IEEE and IEC natural ester standards

Fire FM Global Property Loss Prevention Data Sheets, 5-4 TransformersIEC 61936-1 Power installations exceeding 1 kV a.c. – Part 1: Common rules

11

Page 22: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Proven, global installations

Nearly 1 million FR3 fluid filled transformers in service globally

− 500 medium & large power transformers

− 20,000 indoor units− 5,000 substations− 10,000 retrofills− Industrial, utility and network

transformer

Over 100 US utilities, including 100% new distribution adopters

- Network design systems in major cities like SF, NY, Chicago, Atlanta

FR3 fluid approved for transformers above 420kV/300MVA− HV testing validates usage

through 500kV− 500kV transmission line for

Electronorte, Brazil− 345KV transmission line for

Bureau of reclamation

Over 100 global OEMs applying and promoting technology

22

Page 23: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Key Takeaways• Fire safety

• No fires, cleanup, downtime, or replacement costs• Protects nearby equipment and buildings• Reduced fire mitigation requirements (sprinklers, etc.)• Greatly reduced risk to personnel working at site

• Extended transformer life• Insulation system up to 8X* extended lifespan• Transformer asset extended lifespan• Better handle’s overload conditions• Enables smaller, lighter (75-85C rise) designs

• Environmental • Environmental safety (no hazardous fumes, fires,

reduced spill mitigation)• Petroleum independent• Reduced carbon emissions• Biodegradable/non-toxic/recyclable

23

Page 24: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

THANK YOU

Ty Severson- Utility Sales [email protected]

Page 25: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

How was natural ester dielectric fluid developed and tested?• Cargill and Cooper Power Systems (CPS) developed a partnership

in early 2000’s where Cargill would be the manufacturer and supply chain channel and CPS would be the sales channel and technical support team

• For distribution class equipment, CPS systems knowledge used to develop an extensive validation program through testing

• For power class equipment, industry expert Harold Moore was consulted: – Special equipment required, industry labs were not capable of producing

results without significant increases to impulse generation capability– Extensive test matrix developed to test all capabilities of FR3 – Comparison results with Mineral Oil– 10 year testing program costing millions of dollars by independent labs– Reference ICHVE Papers

In 2012 Cargill completed a full acquisition of CPS Dielectric Fluids operations

SPCAA Presentation – May 13, 201425

Page 26: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Appendix

26

Page 27: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Improve reliability: Extend insulation and asset life 5-8x longer than mineral oilUnique chemistry of FR3™ fluid protects insulating paper by:

• oil

27

• Hydrolysis of natural ester “consumes” the water and produces fatty acids. This process removes dissolved water

• FR3™ Fluid is in essence ‘self drying.’ Water concentrations in the fluid will be reduced due to hydrolysis over time.

• FR3 fluid can absorb significantly more water than mineral oil

• FR3 fluid has 10 times the water saturation (PPM) than mineral

Protecting life of insulation paper is the number one factor that determines asset life

Page 28: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Increased Safety - Reduces Fire Risk

Improved Environmental Footprint

Optimized Transformer Performance Lower total cost Greater Reliability

FR3Key Advantages

28

Page 29: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Fluid differences impact performance

29

Mineral Oil Envirotemp FR3

Fire point 160° C 350° C

Readily and ultimately biodegradable ✗ ✓

Breakdown voltage 70 kV > 75 kV

Moisture saturation (20°C) 55 ppm 1,100 ppm

Cellulose ageing = transformer life poor 5-8 times slower -proven

Oxidation stability sealed or breathing transformers

shut or breathing transformers

Compact transformer design ✗ ✓

Page 30: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Rel

evan

t E

dific

atio

n

Building wall

X1

Sump

ENVIROTEMP FR3 Fluid

X2

Installation Benefits

FluidFluid

Volume (liters)

Minimal separation distancesFrom equipment to edification

X1 Between equip

X2Fire resistant for 2h

Non combustible

Mineral Oil

< 1.900 1,5 m 4,6 m 1,5 m> 1.900

< 19.000 4,6 m 7,6 m 7,6 m

> 19.000 7,6 m 15,2 m 15,2 m

FR3< 38.000 1,5 m 1,5 m> 38.000 4,6 m 7,6 m

Rel

evan

t E

dific

atio

n

MINERAL Oil

Sump

>0,5m >0,5m

Firewall

X1 X2

Sump

Building wall

Rel

evan

t E

dific

atio

n

3030

Page 31: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

CaliforniaEnvironmental

Technology Verification

2013 recipient of Presidential

Green Chemistry

Award USDA BioPreferred

Program

US EPAEnvironmental

Technology Verification

31

2013 recipient of

EPA DfE certification

Page 32: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

CONFIDENTIAL. This document contains trade secret information. Disclosure, use or reproduction outside Cargill or inside Cargill, to or by those employees who do not have a need to know is prohibited except as authorized by Cargill in writing.

Cargill BackgroundHistory:• Founded in 1865 as a single grain elevator in the American frontier

(Iowa)

• Over 150 years as an international provider of food, agricultural and risk management products and services

• Cargill Today: • A privately held, family and employee-owned company with

corporate headquarters in Minneapolis, MN, USA

• An international marketer, processor, and distributor serving food, agricultural, financial and industrial customers

• Business activities span 67 countries and include 143,000 employees

• FR3 fluid produced from U.S. Soybeans • U.S. Farmers & U.S. JOBS !

143,000 Employees

150 years of

experience

Page 33: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Installation BenefitsTypical Containment system for Mineral Oil

Designed to 110% of larger equipment oil volume + rain water + fire fighting system water, automatic or manual

Simplified sump proposed forEnvirotemp FR3 (if required)

Designed for larger equipment oil volume + rain water

Manual or Automatic draining system

Fluid volume + rain water

Rocks for flame suppresion

SumpOil + Rocks volume

Oil / Water separation tank

3333

Page 34: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Simpler, less costly spill remediation

34

Mineral Oil– Low viscosity– Fast seepage (infiltration)– May reach water reservoir – Biodegradation very slow– Very high remediation cost

WaterSoil

Tap Water

FR3 fluid– Non toxic– Seepage very slow– Ready and complete

biodegradation– Very low remediation cost

WaterSoil

Tap Water

Page 35: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Validation

OVER TIME, THE NUMBER OF VALIDATION TESTS HAS SURPASSED 270. THE NUMBER OF 3RD PARTIES THAT HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE BASE NOW EXCEEDS 30 (SAMPLING BELOW).

35

University of Manchester - EnglandUniversity of Hannover - GermanyUniversity of New South Wales - AustraliaMonash University - AustraliaDobleWeidmann

EHVWeidmann Labs

Quality SwitchUniversity of Cincinnati

University of Graz - AustriaTJH2B LabsReinhausenCooper Power Systems - FranksvilleFM GlobalULPowertech LabsSPX TransformersSD MyersEPRIUS Dept of Commerce - NIST

Page 36: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Fluid Comparative Summary

36

MINERAL OIL Excellent Reliability Low Temperatures & Low Losses Lowest Cost Diagnostic Testing Capability Fire Hazard in Sensitive Areas Increasing Environmental Regulation Instability of Supply & Price

CAST RESIN DRY TYPE Good for Clean, Indoor Locations No Liquid Spill Risk

Higher Temperatures & Losses Sensitive to Overload & Harmonics Regular Cleaning RequiredMinimal Diagnostic Testing Service Life Concerns High Initial & Operating Cost

SILICONE Good Fire Safety & Overall Reliability Low Temperature & Low Losses

Higher Cost Less Diagnostic Testing Capability Inferior Coolant & Dielectric Not Suitable as Switching Medium Environmental Concerns – Not Biodegradable

FR3™ FLUID Good Fire Safety & Overall Reliability Biodegradable Sustainable, Renewable Supply Extends solid insulation lifespan Carbon neutral footprint Higher cost

FR3™ fluid is superior to other dielectric fluids in many ways.

Page 37: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Comparison of Dielectric Fluids

37

Electrical PropertiesTest Method M.O. FR3™ Fluid Biotemp DC 561

Dielectric Breakdown (kV)

2mm gap, lab

ambient

D-1816 62 48-75 65 43

1mm gap, lab

ambient

D-1816 31 28 32

Dissipation Factor

25C D-924 0.010 0.023-0.103 0.015 0.007

100C 0.050 0.67-3.86 0.2 0.0015

Volume Resistivity (1012-cm)

D-1169 200 20 10 1000

DC Leakage (µA)

CPS 0.01 0.04

Dielectric Constant

2.2 3.2 3.2 2.26

Impulse Strength (kV)

D-3300 269 226 100 223

Gassing Tendency (µL/min)

D-2300 +6 -79 +5

Page 38: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Comparison of Dielectric Fluids

38

Physical PropertiesTest Method M.O. FR3 Fluid Biotemo DC 561

Appearance D-1524 Clear & bright

Clear & lt green

Clear & bright

Clear & bright

Color D-1500 L-0.5 L-0.5 L-0.5 L-0.5

Flash Point (ºC)

D-92 150 330 330 300

Fire Point (ºC) D-92 165 360 360 343

Auto ignition Temp (ºC)

E-659 225-228 401-404 399-402

Viscosity (cSt)

40 ºC D-445 9.2 33.5 45 37

100 ºC D-445 2.3 8.0 10 15

Pour Point (ºC)

D-97 -50 -21 -15 -55

Heat Capacity (J/gºC

50 ºC E-1269 1.92 2.11

Thermal Expansion (ºC-1)

D-2300 .000795 .00074 .000104

Page 39: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Comparison of Dielectric Fluids

39

Chemical PropertiesTest Method M.O. FR3 Fluid Biotemp DC 561

Water Content (mg/kg)

D-1533B 12 50 150

Acid Number (mgKOH/g)

D-974 0.01 0.02-0.06 0.075 0.002

Interfacial Tension (dynes/cm)

D-971 47 20-25 44.6

Environmental PropertiesBiochemical Oxygen Demand (ppm)

5-day SM5210B

6 250

Chemical Oxygen Demand (ppm)

SM5220D 82 560

BOD/COD ratio (%)

7 45

Aquatic Biodegradability (%)

OECD 301B 30-35 > 99 97

Page 40: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Readly Biodegradable

Ultimate Biodegradable

EPA OPPTS 835.3100

EPA OPPTS 835.3110 (m)

4040

Page 41: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

PLUS

DOE Opportunity

Success = FR3 Fluid

41

Page 42: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

1 Phase Pole/Pad Mount

IN US, ALL 1P POLE MOUNT TRANSFORMERS OPERATE WELL BELOW DESIGN TEMPERATURES. NO LOAD LOSSES DOMINATE TOC CALCULATIONS. SO HOW CAN FR3 FLUID DELIVER VALUE?

42

Most 1P Pole mount transformers are loaded to 25% of nameplate rating.

25kva and/or 50kva dominate utility purchases

Resultant demands:25kva – 6.5kva50kva – 12.5kva

New Concept solution -Employ a ‘slash’ rating to right size the transformer for load while achieving reliability;65C AWR/top thermal rating of insulation system as determined by your transformer OEM

Conceptual solutions: transformers nameplated 10/15KVA or 15/25KVA or 25/32KVA or 37.5/50KVA

Benefits: First Cost benefit. No Load Losses significantly less; Life similar to mineral oil today; operation behavior unchanged

Page 43: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Small 3 Phase Pad Mount

IN SMALL 3P PAD MOUNT TRANSFORMERS, FRONT FACEPLATE IS LIMITING FACTOR. SO HOW CAN FR3 FLUID DELIVER VALUE?

43

Most smaller 3P pad mount transformers (1000kva or less) are mechanically limited by the size of the face plate

Most 3P pad mount transformers are not loaded to nameplate rating

Proposed solution – Specify ‘slash’ ratings65C AWR/top thermal rating of the insulation system as determined by your transformer OEM

Top thermal rating equal to standard

Benefits: First Cost benefit. No Load Losses significantly less; Life similar to mineral oil today; operation behavior unchanged

Page 44: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

To Specify the most reliable insulation system

44

Transformer Insulation System: Transformer insulation system shall be comprised of solid and liquid insulating material. Solid insulation shall be Weidmann TUK solid insulating materials. Liquid insulation system shall Envirotemp FR3 fluid.

Other ‘systems’ may be approved with the submission of life cycle data establishing aging rates similar to those outlined in IEEE C57.154, Annex B.

Base ratings for transformers shall be DOE compliant, and designed to operate at 110C hottest spot temperature, with a 65C average winding rise. Overload capacity shall equal the thermal limits of the insulation system, as verified by the manufacturers of the insulating materials, in conjunction with IEEE C57.154, annex B.

Page 45: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

Large 3 Phase Pad Mount through substations

IN LARGER 3P PAD MOUNT, AND CONTINUING THROUGH SUBSTATION TRANSFORMERS, OPERATING LIMITS ARE TEMPERATURE BASED. SO HOW CAN FR3 FLUID DELIVER VALUE?

45

Most larger 3P pad mount transformers (1500kva or more) are thermally limited

The limitations of those temperature bands outlined by IEEE are for mineral oil insulating systems (the intent is to establish insulation aging rate., and therefore predict transformer life)

Changing the insulation system allows changing the temperature limits, goal is to achieve similar aging rates, predictable transformer life.

Suggested solution – Specify thermal class 140 insulation system, with optimal temperature rise and hot spot ratings

75C AWR, 120C HST up to 85C AWR, 130C HST

Benefits: reduction of external cooling (may eliminate failure mode), smaller footprint; less materials. Life similar to mineral oil today; operation behavior unchanged

Page 46: Pros and Cons of Natural Ester Fluids to Replace Transformer Oil

How Others have taken advantage of FR3 fluid

46

Goals• Reduced failure due to dielectric • Prolong asset life minimum

20 percent• Increased fire safety added benefit

Situation• Large utility • 600k gal/yr. distribution volume• $1,500/transformer• 20,000 transformers replaced/year• Reduced quality of transformers

decreased asset life

Results• 17%/year reduction in number of

transformers replaced

• Savings/year - 3,400 transformers- $5.1 Million net/yr


Recommended