+ All Categories
Home > Science > Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

Date post: 07-Apr-2017
Category:
Upload: sean-ekins
View: 929 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
42
Sean Ekins Collaborations In Chemistry, Fuquay Varina, NC 27526 Email: [email protected] Twitter: Collabchem
Transcript
Page 1: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

Sean Ekins

Collaborations In Chemistry, Fuquay Varina, NC 27526

Email: [email protected]

Twitter: Collabchem

Page 2: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

Senior Consultant

Since 2007

Chief Scientific Officer

Since 2008

Chief Science Officer

Since 2013

CEO, President, Co-Founder

Since 2012

CEO, Founder

Since 2015

Blogger

Since 2011

Consulting ADME/Tox,

drug discovery

cheminformatics

Grant PI, bringing in

funding, neglected disease

drug discovery research –

use cheminformatics

Facilitate science & SAB,

write grants, collaborate

Grant PI, rare disease-

Sanfilippo Syndrome

Write grants and

collaborate on rare and

neglected diseases,

cheminformatics

Blog about drug discovery

Page 3: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

I work on diverse projects (drug discovery, grant writing etc.)

Need to make people aware that I am here and gain visibility for work

Different networks (neglected disease, rare disease)

Different audience backgrounds (cheminformatics, patients, investors)

Different needs (customers for software vs customers for consulting, vs VCs for investment)

Page 4: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

Most of my links in one place

Page 5: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

A single webpage is a starting point

Page 6: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

Using software to help connect to others

Providing your science in a consumable assessible format

Using software / apps to assess use of your output

Downloads of papers, views, citations

What works and what does not in this space

Marketing vs Social marketing

Networking for connections

Page 7: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

Visibility

Cost

Global Reach

Openness

Enhanced or new collaborations

Career changing

Bottom line – people can find you and your work

Page 8: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

It’s a full time job

Once in – there is no reason for going back

Longevity / permanence of information

Law of unintended consequences

Frightening for the inexperienced

Bottom line – there are no free rides, you get out what you put in

Page 9: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

LinkedIn – my only tool for a long time

Then it all exploded with a paper

iPhone

Antony Williams

Alex Clark

Williams et al DDT 16:928-939, 2011

Page 10: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

Links to Slideshare etc.

Use to post links to blogs, slides etc.

Page 11: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

Blog

Wiki’s

Mobile app development

Using a whole array of tools

Twitter

Slideshare

Figshare

Kudos

Pubmed Commons

F1000Research

Page 12: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists
Page 13: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists
Page 14: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

App for rare and neglected diseases

ShareData and molecules

Inspiration:P4C2011Scio2012

Instigation:PA Dragons Den 2012

Crowdfunding visibilityPublications, posters, talks

biotech

Mol Informatics, 31: 585-597, 2012

ODDT

Page 15: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists
Page 16: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

I put all slides on here

Page 17: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

I put datasets and posters on here

Page 18: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

Occasional I put preprints on figshare as well

I now like to publish in F1000Research

Several more PLOS, BMC papers..

Fewer totally closed papers..

My profile is increasing I think..

More followers on Twitter

Increased citations

Page 19: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

Used to track and enrich papers

Page 20: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

Takes a lot of effort

Need to select papers

Add summary, links etc.

Page 21: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists
Page 22: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

Actions can impact views

Page 23: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists
Page 24: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

A way to comment on work in pubmed and enrich

Page 25: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists
Page 26: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

Collaborations started from tweets

Page 27: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

And lead to this…

Page 28: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists
Page 29: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

Michele Rhee MBA

Connected on Twitter

Helped us write paper

GoTo meeting with colleagues

managing collaborations funding

science

Introduct

ion to a

company

We had already

connected

Intro to

others

gave me CV

for a

postdoc at

Harvard

Page 30: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

Every company needs a person engaging, mining and connecting

Page 31: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

Highlight talks

Papers being published

Any interesting science from outside own network

Putting ideas out there

Try not to overload, keep tone professional,

How you would like to be treated.

Occasional analysis of how papers are used

Page 32: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

Do not have to do anything once set up

Useful to check ‘cites’ and do searches, no frills

Page 33: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

Highs.. When someone else blogs on our papers, journalist writes about work

When a rare disease parent finds you

When you start a new collaboration via Twitter

Lows.. When you get people stalking your science and writing really nasty things on blogs, Twitter etc.

Journalists that totally twist your words / waste time

When you realize that you still have >100 papers to summarize in Kudos

When you get introduced to a new tool and realize you have to repeat weeks of work that you have already done elsewhere

Page 34: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

Multiple levels of tools

1 – data sources = Slideshare, figshare, blogs, journals etc.

2 – compilers = Google Scholar, Research Gate, Academia, GrowKudos

3 – tools that provide scores of output= altmetric, Research Gate

There are too many tools you need to use – adds to stress

Select carefully – many duplicate / overlap in function

Unclear benefits of some tools – time wasting

LinkedIn may not be enough

Page 35: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

Poor design

Unclear whats in it for me

Spurious results

Page 36: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

Barely use it..a couple of times a year – provide reprint requests – get many annoying email alerts

Page 37: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists
Page 38: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists
Page 39: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

None of these people were my co-authors??

Page 40: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

I do not know these authors

Page 41: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

Do something:

If you are a new scientist starting out building your network and needing visibility

Because the sooner you start the easier maintenance will be

Do nothing:

If you are an older scientist, retired, with no time

If you really do not want to be visible

If you cannot face hours setting up, uploading papers, preprints, summarizing papers etc.

Page 42: Pros and cons of social networking for scientists

Fame and wealth Hard to determine if it helped with funding from NIH etc

Job offers Having a webpage / CV alone definitely has lead to consulting jobs

More free time I think maintaining all the tools suck up free time

More relaxed I am probably less relaxed because I wonder what I am missing or need to

improve

Still opportunities for new tools Make it easier on the scientist, integrate more of the functions, show clear

benefits of participating


Recommended