Date post: | 18-Feb-2017 |
Category: |
Science |
Upload: | mark-berjanskii |
View: | 1,680 times |
Download: | 0 times |
SAXS CryoEM
MS
NMR
CD EPR
X-RAY FRET
Hybrid protein structure determination
Mark Berjanskii, Edmonton, July 2015
Definition
Hybrid protein structure determination is the 3D modelling of a protein structure using experimental data from different experimental methods
How is it relevant?
Prion protein Mad Cow disease
-synuclein Parkinson's disease
Amyloid beta (Aβ or Abeta) Alzheimer's Disease
Proteins investigated in Wishart’s group can not be studied by traditional high-resolution methods of structure determination
Outline
1) Traditional methods:
X-ray crystallography
Solution NMR
2) Low-resolution methods
Mass-spectrometry
EPR spin-labeling
FRET
SAXS
3) GAMDy -> Hybrid-GAMDy
Why do we need to know protein structure?
Traditional methods of protein structure determination
SAXS CryoEM
MS
NMR
CD EPR
X-RAY FRET
X-ray crystallography
X-ray crystallography
Data analysis: indexing, merging , scaling, phasing
Resolution of X-ray structures
Pros and cons of X-ray crystallography
Advantages: Disadvantages
Provides high-resolution information Unlike solution NMR, does not require a protein be soluble in a high-concentrated solution Unlike solution NMR, can be applied to proteins with MW > 200kD
Requires a protein crystal Can not be used with amyloid fibrils Crystal contacts can distort protein structure Can not be used with very flexible molecules
SAXS CryoEM
MS
NMR
CD EPR
X-RAY FRET
Solution NMR spectroscopy
Summary of solution NMR spectroscopy
Experiment Spectra processing Spectra assignment
NOE assignment
Distance restraints
Model generation
Resolution of NMR structures
Macromolecular NMR spectroscopy for the non-spectroscopist. Kwan AH, Mobli M, Gooley PR, King GF, Mackay JP. FEBS J. 2011 Mar;278(5):687-703
Pros and cons of solution NMR spectroscopy
Advantages: Disadvantages
Provides high-resolution information Unlike XRAY, does not require a protein crystal and is not affected by crystal contacts Can be used to study flexible proteins Reflects conformational averaging
Requires high concentrations of soluble protein Can not be applied to large proteins (800kD max so far) Can not be used with amyloid fibrils
Solid-state NMR
Solid-state NMR with magic angle
spinning for insoluble proteins
HET-S prion 2008
Pros and cons of solid-state NMR spectroscopy
Advantages: Disadvantages
Can be used to study poorly soluble proteins
Can not be applied to large proteins Requires highly homogeneous sample Has troubles with flexible protein regions Limited resolution and sensitivity
SAXS CryoEM
MS
NMR
CD EPR
X-RAY FRET
Mass spectrometry
Distance restraints from MS cross-linking experiments
Distance restraints
Model generation
Pros and cons of MS cross-linking
Advantages: Disadvantages
Unlike X-ray, it does not require protein crystal Unlike solution NMR, it does not require highly concentrated soluble protein Can work with large proteins above the NMR limit
Requires protein modification that can alter protein properties. Provides only sparse restraints Can’t cross-link buried residues
MS cross-linking and prions
HET-S prion
25-hour H-D exchange of PrP
Large cross-linking agents will not penetrate tight fibril core
β-Sheet core of human prion protein amyloid fibrils as determined by hydrogen/deuterium exchange Xiaojun Lu, Patrick L. Wintrode, and Witold K. Surewicz
Photo-Induced Cross-Linking of Unmodified Proteins (PICUP) ?????
Are there other methods to study fibril core?
SAXS CryoEM
MS
NMR
CD EPR
X-RAY FRET
Electron paramagnetic resonance
Electron paramagnetic resonance Principle
- the Bohr magneton
- Landé g-factor 2.0023 for free electron
Electron paramagnetic resonance Spectra
Electron paramagnetic resonance Spectrometer
Site-directed spin labeling for EPR
EPR dipolar broadening and exchange narrowing
5-6 Å
Electron-electron dipolar interactions
Spin exchange
8–25 Å
EPR spectra of spin-labeled PrPSC
50 nitroxide-derivatized Cys mutants of huPrP90–231
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Nov 27;104(48):18946-51. Molecular architecture of human prion protein amyloid: a parallel, in-register beta-structure. Cobb NJ1, Sönnichsen FD, McHaourab H, Surewicz WK.
PrPSC is in-register parallel β-sheet
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Nov 27;104(48):18946-51. Molecular architecture of human prion protein amyloid: a parallel, in-register beta-structure. Cobb NJ1, Sönnichsen FD, McHaourab H, Surewicz WK.
EPR pros and cons
Advantages: Disadvantages
Unlike X-ray crystallography, EPR does not require a protein crystal Unlike NMR, does not require a protein be soluble in a high-concentrated solution EPR has better sensitivity than NMR Proteins are labeled before fibrillization, no need to penetrate fibril core
Requires multiple site-directed mutations Properties of spin-labeled proteins may be different from the original Can provide only sparse distance restraints
SAXS CryoEM
MS
NMR
CD EPR
X-RAY FRET
Förster resonance energy transfer
Förster resonance energy transfer
R0 - Förster distance of the pair of donor and acceptor, i.e. the distance at which the energy transfer efficiency is 50%
Q0 is the fluorescence quantum yield of the donor, κ2 is the dipole orientation factor, n is the refractive index of the medium, NA is Avogadro's number, and J is the spectral overlap integral
FRET applications Protein-protein interactions Protein conformation change
Unfolding of apolipoprotein fibril on lipid bilayer
Soft Matter. 2015 Jul 29;11(31):6223-34. FRET evidence for untwisting of amyloid fibrils on the surface of model membranes. Gorbenko G1, Trusova V, Girych M, Adachi E, Mizuguchi C, Akaji K, Saito H.
Donor: Fluorescent probe Laurdan Acceptor: Thioflavin T (ThT)
FRET pros and cons
Advantages: Disadvantages
Unlike X-ray crystallography, FRET does not require a protein crystal Unlike NMR, does not require a protein be soluble in a high-concentrated solution Proteins are labeled before fibrillization, no need to penetrate fibril core
Requires multiple site-directed mutations Properties of labeled proteins may be different from the original Can provide only sparse distance restraints
SAXS CryoEM
MS
NMR
CD EPR
X-RAY FRET
Small angle X-ray scattering
SAXS equipment
Bruker NANOSTAR X-RAY scattering system
Small-angle X-ray scattering
Analysis of SAXS curves
SAXS and amyloid proteins
Metallomics. 2015 Mar;7(3):536-43 Small angle X-ray scattering analysis of Cu(2+)-induced oligomers of the Alzheimer's amyloid β peptide. Ryan TM1, Kirby N, Mertens HD, Roberts B, Barnham KJ, Cappai R, Pham Cle L, Masters CL, Curtain CC.
Effect of Cu(2+) concentration on Abeta oligomers
SAXS pros and cons
Advantages: Disadvantages
Unlike X-ray crystallography, SAXS does not require a protein crystal Does not require a protein be soluble in a high-concentrated solution Does not require protein modification
No high-resolution information
CryoEM SAXS
MS
NMR
CD EPR
X-RAY FRET
Cryo-electron microscopy (CryoEM)
Cryo-electron microscopy
Image formation in the electron microscope. (a) Electrons, emitted by a source that is housed under a high vacuum, are accelerated down the microscope column . After passing through the specimen, scattered electrons are focused by the electromagnetic lenses of the microscope (b) Schematic illustrating the principle of data collection for electron tomography. As the specimen is tilted relative to the electron beam, a series of images is taken of the same field of view. (c) Rendering of selected projection views generated during cryo-electron tomography
3D image from Cryo-EM
Examples of Cryo-EM images
(a,b) Illustration of spiral architecture of the nucleoid in Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus showing (a) a 210 Å thick tomographic slice through
the 3D volume of a cell (b) a 3D surface rendering of the same cell,
with the spiral nucleoid highlighted (c) Higher magnification view of a
tomographic slice through the cell, showing well-separated nucleoid spirals and ribosomes (dark dots) distributed at the edge of the nucleoid.
(d) Expanded views of 210 Å thick tomographic slices, showing top-views of polar chemoreceptor arrays.
Cryo-EM revolution in structural biology
Cryo-EM can now achieve a resolution necessary for de novo structure determination
Cryo-EM structures <5Å
Examples of “high-resolution” de novo structures from Cryo-EM
A) transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 1 (TRPV1) ion channel
B) F420-reducing [NiFe] hydrogenase
C) large subunit of the yeast mitochondrial ribosome
D) γ-secretase.
CryoEM pros and cons Advantages: Disadvantages
CryoEM can achieve high enough resolution Unlike X-ray crystallography, CryoEM does not require a protein crystal Unlike solution NMR, CryoEM does not require a protein be soluble in a high-concentrated solution Unlike mass-spectrometry, CryoEM does not require protein modification
Complex measurements and data analysis Difficult to use for proteins with MW below < 300KDa CryoEM application for high-resolution structure determination is still new and has not been thoroughly tested by the scientific community Shortage of labs with proper equipment and expertise
How can we contribute to hybrid structure determination?
GAMDy
Genetic Algorithm for biased Molecular Dynamics
CONTRA MD biasing
CS-GAMDy performance Distorted model of ubiquitin
(reference PDB ID: 1UBQ) Distorted model of Q5E7H1
(reference PDB ID: 2JVW)
Comparative model of NFU1 homolog (reference PDB ID: 2M5O,
template PDB ID: 1TH5, sequence ID: 20%)
Comparative model of ubiquitin (reference PDB ID: 1UBQ,
template PDB ID: 1IYF, sequence ID: 30%)
Hybrid-GAMDy
Torsions Distances
XPLOR 3.81
SAXS Distances
XPLOR NIH
CryoEM NAMD
NMR, FRET, MS, EPR distances, X-ray data, NMR torsion angles
MD biasing
Genetic algorithm
In-house scoring functions for SAXS, CryoEM, MS