+ All Categories
Home > Documents > PRRB Appeals: Making the Process Work for You · PRRB Appeals: Making the Process Work for You ......

PRRB Appeals: Making the Process Work for You · PRRB Appeals: Making the Process Work for You ......

Date post: 06-Oct-2018
Category:
Upload: vanlien
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
13
3/18/2013 1 PRRB Appeals: Making the Process Work for You American Health Lawyers Association Institute on Medicare & Medicaid Payment Issues March 2022, 2013 Lisa Sarris Cowhey Melanie MarolfFetchik Lisa Ogilvie Stephanie Webster Topics Will my case pass jurisdictional/procedural muster? What is a proper group appeal and how do I keep one on track? What is a MAC and how do I find mine? How do I keep my appeal from being sidelined by procedural snafus? Board Rules issued 3/1/2013—what are the most significant issues? 2
Transcript
Page 1: PRRB Appeals: Making the Process Work for You · PRRB Appeals: Making the Process Work for You ... • How do I keep my appeal from being ... earlier slide) E. Amount in controversy

3/18/2013

1

PRRB Appeals:Making the Process Work for You

American Health Lawyers AssociationInstitute on Medicare & Medicaid Payment Issues

March 20‐22, 2013

Lisa Sarris CowheyMelanie Marolf‐Fetchik

Lisa OgilvieStephanie Webster

Topics

• Will my case pass jurisdictional/procedural muster?

• What is a proper group appeal and how do I keep one on track?

• What is a MAC and how do I find mine?

• How do I keep my appeal from being sidelined by procedural snafus?

• Board Rules issued 3/1/2013—what are the most significant issues?

2

Page 2: PRRB Appeals: Making the Process Work for You · PRRB Appeals: Making the Process Work for You ... • How do I keep my appeal from being ... earlier slide) E. Amount in controversy

3/18/2013

2

Jurisdiction?

Jurisdictional/Procedural Requirements 

● Dissatisfaction (effective for CRPs ending on or after 12/31/2008)

● claimed cost and audit adjustment; or 

● protested item

● Revised NPRs

● only matters specifically revised are within the scope of an appeal (not within scope if “reopened but not revised”)

● 180 days from final determination (date of filing=date of receipt by Board for appeal filed on or after 8/21/08)

● $10K for individual; $50K for group (Board may allow multi‐year groups to meet this requirement)

3

Jurisdiction?

Cost Report Protest Items and Ensuing Appeals 

● Program manual instructions for cost report protest items (new Board Rule 7.2.C; Provider Reimbursement Manual, Part II, §§115, 3630.1) 

● Identify each protested issue/self‐disallowed item

● State reimbursement impact for each issue

● PRM:  “reasonable methodology which closely approximates the actual effect”

● Provide work papers showing calculation of impact

● PRM: contractor may “evaluate the reasonableness of the methodology for purposes of establishing whether the cost report is acceptable”

4

Page 3: PRRB Appeals: Making the Process Work for You · PRRB Appeals: Making the Process Work for You ... • How do I keep my appeal from being ... earlier slide) E. Amount in controversy

3/18/2013

3

Jurisdiction?

Cost Report Protest Items and Ensuing Appeals 

● Other requirements for protested item appeals (new Board Rule 7.1) 

● Concise issue statement

● Reimbursement impact

● Authority “that predetermined that the claim would be disallowed”

● Cost report protested item page(s) (new Board Rule 21.D.2requirement for group Schedule of Providers)

5

Jurisdiction?

Revised NPR appeal documentation requirements (Board Rule 7.1)

● Revised NPR under appeal

● NPR immediately preceding revised NPR under appeal

● Reopening request that preceded the revised NPR (if applicable)

● Reopening notice issued by the MAC

● Revised NPR workpapers for the issues under appeal

● Any applicable cost report worksheets

6

Page 4: PRRB Appeals: Making the Process Work for You · PRRB Appeals: Making the Process Work for You ... • How do I keep my appeal from being ... earlier slide) E. Amount in controversy

3/18/2013

4

Jurisdiction?

Jurisdictional Trends

● Audit adjustment/claimed item (DSH, FTEs)

● Protest item (self‐disallowed vs. unclaimed item)

● Revised NPRs

● Identifying and appealing the issue (e.g., DSH, prior/penultimate year)

● Equitable tolling

● Board “own motion” review

● Timing of jurisdictional objections and responses (Board Rule 44.4)

7

Group Appeals

One “Common” Issue 

● Single question of fact or interpretation of law, regulations, or CMS Ruling that is common to each provider (42 C.F.R. §405.1837(b)(2))

● Not common issue if Board could make different findings for different providers based on factual differences (Board Rule 13)

● Board may allow a group appeal to encompass multiple years if no change in relevant law, but not multiple issues

8

Page 5: PRRB Appeals: Making the Process Work for You · PRRB Appeals: Making the Process Work for You ... • How do I keep my appeal from being ... earlier slide) E. Amount in controversy

3/18/2013

5

Group Appeals

Commonly Owned/Controlled Providers

● CIRP ‐mandatory Common Issue Related Party group

● Related party—standard Medicare definition (42 C.F.R. §413.17; PRM Part I Ch. 10)

● Mandatory vs. optional groups

● No commingling  of related and unrelated providers

9

Group Appeals

Certifications

● none of the appealed issues are currently pending or were previously adjudicated, withdrawn or dismissed; and

● no other related provider has pending appeal on the same issue(s) for the same calendar year

Direct Adds to Groups

● New Board Rule 16.1.B and New Model Form E (3/1/13)—must attach NPR

10

Page 6: PRRB Appeals: Making the Process Work for You · PRRB Appeals: Making the Process Work for You ... • How do I keep my appeal from being ... earlier slide) E. Amount in controversy

3/18/2013

6

Group Appeals

Schedules of Providers (3/1/13 Board Rules at 70‐71)

● Documentation showing jurisdictional/procedural requirements met

● Organized by lettered columns on cover schedule with corresponding tabs for supporting documentation

A.  Date of final determination 

B.  Date of hearing request filing (documentation of delivery for appeals filed after 8/21/08—Board Rule 21.B)

11

Group Appeals

Schedules of Providers (continued)C.  Number of days between final determination and 

appeal filing (receipt by Board if filed on or after 8/21/08)

● For issues added to individual appeal then transferred to group, number of days from determination to add (21.C.)

D.  Audit adjustment number or protest item information

● Additional documentation for revised NPRs (21.D.; see earlier slide)

E.  Amount in controversy

F.  Prior case numbers (Board Rule 21E)

12

Page 7: PRRB Appeals: Making the Process Work for You · PRRB Appeals: Making the Process Work for You ... • How do I keep my appeal from being ... earlier slide) E. Amount in controversy

3/18/2013

7

Group Appeals

Schedules of Providers (continued)

G.  Dates of Direct Add/Transfer

● Paper trail showing how provider cost year added to group (new Board Rules 16.1, 21.G)

● Transfers (Board Alert 8, 12/8/2011; new Board Rules 16.1.A, 21.G 3/01/13)

● Direct adds to group (new Board Rule 16.1.B)

H.  Provider representative letter including year andissue—new Tab (new Board Rule 21.H)

● Full copies to Board and lead MAC; cover schedule only to BCBSA (excel format requested) (New Board Rule 20.1)

13

Group Appeals

Designation of Lead MAC

● Greatest number of providers OR if tied, amount in controversy controls

● Designate lead MAC upon group formation, but may need modification later

● Notify old and new MAC if a lead MAC change

● Appeal Correspondence must specify MAC jurisdiction & MAC name, including State:

Example:     JH‐ Novitas—Texas

J12‐Novitas—New Jersey

14

Page 8: PRRB Appeals: Making the Process Work for You · PRRB Appeals: Making the Process Work for You ... • How do I keep my appeal from being ... earlier slide) E. Amount in controversy

3/18/2013

8

1 - Palmetto GBA (CA, NV, HI)FCSO –Subcontractor

11 –Palmetto (SC, NC, VA, WV) Novitas Solutions, Inc. (formerly Highmark) (TX, OK, NM, 

CO, AR, LA, MS).  CMS combined J‐4 & J‐7. 

5 - WPS (KS, MO, NE, IA) WPS was re-awarded J-5 on July 31, 2012.

12 - Novitas Solutions, Inc. (formerly Highmark Medicare Services)

(PA, NJ, DE, MD, DC)

– Noridian (CA, NV, HI, American Samoa, Guam, N. Mariana Islands).  Formerly J‐1 (Palmetto) – awarded 9/2012.  *PROTEST* 

National Government Services, Inc (NGS) (IL, WI, MN) 13 – NGS (NY, CT)

* – Novitas  (DE, DC, MD, NJ &  PA) ‐ Formerly J‐12 (Novitas) *PROTEST* 

8 - WPS (IN, MI) Re-awarded to WPS - 9/30/2011.

(ME, VT, NH, MA, RI)NGS–Subcontractor

*K – NGS (NY, CT, MA, RI, VT, ME and NH).  CMS has combined J‐13 & J‐14.

(FL, Puerto Rico) Blue Cross Blue Shield of SC acquired CIGNA Government Services) (OH, KY)

*N – (Florida, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands)RFP released 12/07/12 ‐ Formerly J‐9 (First Coast) 

(AL, GA, TN) – Noridian (WA, OR, ID, AK, AZ, UT, WY, MT, ND, SD)

CMS has combined J‐2 & J‐3

J – (Alabama, Georgia and Tennessee) – RFP released 1/24/13. Formerly J‐10 (Cahaba).

A/B MAC Jurisdictions 

RI

MA

As of March 1, 2013 Prepared by BCBSA

1

NH

Puerto Rico

WA

OR

CA

HI

TX

NMAZ

UT

NV

ID

MT ND

SD

NE

WY

COKS

OK AR

LA

MSAL

GA

FL

SC

NC

TN

KYMO

IL

IA

MN

WIMI

INOH

WV

VA

PA

NY

MEVT

CT

NJDE

MDDC

AK

2

10

2

1

3

4

5

13

12

11

9

15

3

7

*HJ-4&J-7

*FJ-2&J-3

14

2AK

*E J-1

8

6

*L J-12

*K J-13, J-14

*N J-9

*JJ-10

15

16

As of Prepared by BCBSA

Page 9: PRRB Appeals: Making the Process Work for You · PRRB Appeals: Making the Process Work for You ... • How do I keep my appeal from being ... earlier slide) E. Amount in controversy

3/18/2013

9

• J1‐JE     FCSO‐CA  (CA, NV, HI) –Awarded to Noridian— Under Protest

• JF‐ Noridian (WA, OR, ID, AK, AZ, UT, WY, MT, ND, SD)

• JH‐ Novitas  (TX, OK, NM, CO, AR, LA, MS) 

• J5‐ WPS (KS, MO, NE, IA)

• J6‐ NGS‐IL, NGS‐WI, Noridian‐MN  (IL, WI, MN) Awarded to NGS—Transitioning in July & August 2013

• J8‐ WPS  (IN, MI)

• J9‐JN    FCSO‐FL  (FL, Puerto Rico) RFP released 12/07/12

• J10‐ Cahaba, GBS  (AL, GA, TN) 

• J11‐ Palmetto  (SC, NC, VA, WV)

• J12‐JL  Novitas (PA, NJ, DE, MD, DC) –Awarded to Novitas— Under Protest

• J13‐JK  NGS‐NY  (NY, CT)‐Awarded to NGS

• J14‐JK  NGS‐ME  (ME, VT, NH, MA, RI)‐ Awarded to NGS

• J15‐ Palmetto  (OH, KY)

A/B MAC Jurisdictions‐PRRB Appeals Contractors 

17

As of March 1, 2013 Prepared by BCBSA

ASC‐BCBSA / Senior Government Initiatives

18

As of March 1, 2013 Prepared by BCBSA

Page 10: PRRB Appeals: Making the Process Work for You · PRRB Appeals: Making the Process Work for You ... • How do I keep my appeal from being ... earlier slide) E. Amount in controversy

3/18/2013

10

ASC‐BCBSA / Senior Government Initiatives

19

As of March 1, 2013 Prepared by BCBSA

Procedural Snafus

Expedited judicial review (Board Rule 42)

● Statute—Board lacks “authority to decide question”

● Decision 30 days from date Board finds jurisdiction and request is “complete”

● Filing EJR requests

20

Page 11: PRRB Appeals: Making the Process Work for You · PRRB Appeals: Making the Process Work for You ... • How do I keep my appeal from being ... earlier slide) E. Amount in controversy

3/18/2013

11

Procedural Snafus

Provider Representative Letter Requirements

● Signed by owner/officer on provider letterhead (Board Rule 5.4) 

● Only one representative per case (Board Rule 5.1)

● Contemporaneous and appeal specific

● For individual appeal, must identify provider’s fiscal year (modified Board Rule 5.4)

● For group appeal, must identify provider’s fiscal year and issue (new Board Rule 21.H—new Tab H to Schedule)

21

Procedural Snafus

Service Copies and Electronic Filing

● Send any document filed with the Board simultaneously to opposing party and appeals support contractor (BCBSA)

● Send electronically to BCBSA (do not send documentation supporting Schedule of Providers—cover schedule only)

● Multiple hard copies to Board for multiple cases (highlight case number)

● 5 copies of position papers to Board 7‐10 days before hearing (modified Board Rule 27.6)

● Redact confidential information ‐ PHI and PII

● Board requires redaction to avoid public disclosure

● Do not send PHI or PII to BCBSA

22

Page 12: PRRB Appeals: Making the Process Work for You · PRRB Appeals: Making the Process Work for You ... • How do I keep my appeal from being ... earlier slide) E. Amount in controversy

3/18/2013

12

Procedural Snafus

Postponement of Hearings (Board Rule 30.3)

● Scheduling conflict

● Board expects parties to be ready

● Probable settlement does not guarantee

● Documentation issues

● Jurisdictional challenges

● Timetable/joint scheduling order

23

Procedural Snafus

Remands

● CMS Ruling CMS‐1498‐R (April 28, 2010)

● Medicare DSH Appeals on SSI fraction data matching process, “non‐covered” days, labor and delivery days

● TDL‐11456 (Sept. 6, 2011)

● Appeals on labor and delivery days

● CMS Ruling CMS‐1355‐R (April 14, 2011)

● Hospice cap determinations ‐‐ TDL‐11367, June 23, 2011

● Remand issues in pending appeals

24

Page 13: PRRB Appeals: Making the Process Work for You · PRRB Appeals: Making the Process Work for You ... • How do I keep my appeal from being ... earlier slide) E. Amount in controversy

3/18/2013

13

QUESTIONS?

25

Presenters

Lisa Sarris [email protected](312) 297‐5521

Melanie Marolf‐[email protected](410) 786‐5599 

Lisa [email protected](410) 786‐2922

Stephanie [email protected](202) 887‐4049

Thank you!

26


Recommended