Date post: | 02-Jun-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | xuanwen-lee |
View: | 217 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 49
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
1/49
Language
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
2/49
Defining Language
Two aspects of language
Production
Thought Expression
Comprehension
Expression Thought
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
3/49
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
4/49
Level 1: Speech Sounds
Phonemes
minimal unit that distinguishes words
most basic units of sound
language specific
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
5/49
Example of Phonemes
/p/: pit vs /b/: bit
/k/: cut vs //: gut
/m/: map vs /n/: nap
/s/: sap vs /z/: zap
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
6/49
Level 2: Word Units
Morpheme
any linguistic unit that carries meaning
smallest unit of sound that has a meaning
may or may not be complete words
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
7/49
Examples of Morphemes
run + n-ing = running
cut + t-ing = cutting
Un + kind = unkind
Un + like = unlike
Un + welcome = unwelcome
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
8/49
Tests
Are the following phonemes or morphemes ?
1. sh
2. s 3. ing
4. d
5. ed
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
9/49
Level 3: Sentence Units
Phrases or sentences
Organization of words
Proposition
Subject
Predicate (description)
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
10/49
Identify the subject and the
predicate
The man was tired and angry.
Gina was lost.
Henni is very intelligent
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
11/49
Sentences often divided into phrases:
Noun phrase
Focus on subject and description of subject
Eg: The funny kangaroo Verb phrase
Focus on action
Eg: . Jumped highly and quickly.
Wilkes and Kennedy (1969)
English speakers automatically divide the sentence into
phrases and process each part separately
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
12/49
Syntax
the system of rules for combining words and
phrases to form grammatically correct
sentences
Syntactic analysis
defines the accurate associations and relationshipsbetween words in a sentence
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
13/49
The honest mans son was always
caught cheating.
Syntactic Analysis
who was honest?
Man = Honest
who was caught cheating?
Son = Caught Cheating
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
14/49
Syntax
vsGrammar
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
15/49
This guy, very honest one, but I
tell you, his son, always cheat one-
lah.
Bad grammar but clear syntactic analysis
Rules of language broken; but content is
clear
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
16/49
The cheating fathers son was not
as honest as him.
Syntactically ambiguous sentence
Difficulty dividing phrases
Difficulty forming associations between nouns
and verbs
Who was cheating?
Who was not as honest?
Who is him?
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
17/49
Comprehension Activity
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
18/49
Bransford and Johnson (1973)
Importance of Context
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
19/49
Neural Basis of Language
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
20/49
Brocas Area
Location = posterior frontal lobe
Function = syntactic stage of production
uhm Psaycholigy am study .
Very.. intarastyes.
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
21/49
Wernickes Area
Location = temporal lobe
Function = production and comprehension
of words (morphemes) and concepts
Yes, I love sealing psychology. I find it
really making.
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
22/49
Caramazza and Zurif (1976)
Syntactic analysis test
The lion that the tiger is chasing is fat.
Who is fat?
Brocas aphasics struggle with more complicated
syntactic analysis Wernickes aphasics struggle with word
comprehension
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
23/49
Zurif, Carramazza, Myerson and Galvin,
1974)
Test for conceptual deficits
Word triads
Wernickes aphasics struggle more thanBrocas aphasics
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
24/49
Pigeon
PoodleChicken
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
25/49
Chair
GreenTable
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
26/49
Conduction Aphasia
Unable to repeat sentences
Connection between comprehension andproduction is damaged
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
27/49
Development of Language
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
28/49
Phonemes
Children sensitive to discrimination of phonemeslinked to their language
Eimas (1985) Rate of sucking (DV)
Discrimination of new sounds (rate of sucking increases)
6 months = not language specific
1 year old = language specific (eg. Japanese cannotdiscriminate /l/ and /r/
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
29/49
Words and Concepts
Begin using words = 1215 months
Nouns
People
Animals
Toys
Body parts
Household items
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
30/49
Over-extension of concepts
Papa to all adult males
Doggy to all furry animals
Puppies to all baby animals
Rice to all food
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
31/49
Vocabulary
15 months = 25 words
6 years = 15,000 words
25 - 40 months
Sudden increase childs vocabulary
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
32/49
Sentences
16 months30 months
From single word speech to two word phrases
bed to my bed; food to eat food
30 months onwards
More complete syntax and grammar
eat food to I want to eat food
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
33/49
How is Language Learnt
Imitation
Repeat words what they hear
Family, TV
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
34/49
Conditioning (operant)
Rewarded for attempting to speak attention
Rewarded for correct choice of words Attention
Recognition of meaning = get what they ask for
Rewarded for correct grammar (sentence
construction) Verbal praise
Correction when wrong
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
35/49
Hypothesis Testing
Notice patterns of language (see Slobins
Operating Principles, 1971).
rules of syntax and grammar
Over-extension of principles: Examples
ed played vs waked runned s snakes vs gooses mouses
fy clarify vs smallify biggify
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
36/49
Critical Periods for Language
Acquisition
Phonemes (12-24 months)
Affects accents and pronunciation
Includes bilingual and multilingual
Syntax and Structure (8-12 yrs)
Affects sentence construction
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
37/49
Language and Thought
Language as the building blocks of thought
Concepts
Represent a class (so that we do not have to treatevery thing in the world as unique)
Objects
Species
Activities
Categorization
When we assign items to a concept
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
38/49
Hierarchies of Concepts
Many levels of classification
Usually there is a basic level
First levels learnt by children
Used most frequently by people
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
39/49
Animals
MammalsReptiles
Sea based Land based
Whales Cats
Wild Domestic
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
40/49
How do we categorize?
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
41/49
Example 1: What is a mother?
List properties
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
42/49
Example 2: What is a chair?
List Properties
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
43/49
How do we categorize
Well defined concepts
Eg. Mother
Female Has a child
Rule based
categorization Rely less of mental
prototype
Fuzzy concepts
Eg. Chair
Too many rules Rules too abstract
Similarity based
categorization Create mental
prototype
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
44/49
Learning about Concepts
Explicit learning
Taught rules about a concept
food is ..
this is a type of food
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
45/49
Experience
Exemplar strategy
Exemplar = stored example of a category
New object = compared to exemplar to gaugesimilarity
If similar = new object is now added to stored
exemplars
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
46/49
Children tend to use examplars/prototypes
rather than core properties/rules
Keil and Batterman (1984)
Description of robber
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
47/49
A. A smelly, mean man with agun in his pocket who came and
took your TV set because your
parents didnt want it anymore
and told him he could have it.
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
48/49
B. A friendly cheerful woman who
gave you a hug but then took
your TV away without permissionand will not return it.
8/10/2019 PSY 111 Language Oct 2014
49/49
Children aged 5-9yrs = more likely to
define A as the robber
Used prototype of robbers
Only at age 10 = more likely to define B as
the robber
Used core/properties focused