Public Hearing

February 26, 2013February 26, 2013

Case: LUP-11-06-136

Project: North of Albert’s LUP

Appellant: Duke Woodson

Applicant: Duke Woodson

District: 1

Request: To consider an appeal of the Development Review Committee’s (DRC) decision on November 21, 2012, to deny a request for Impact Fee Credit eligibility for the proposed Adequate Public Facility (APF) Road C.

North of Albert’s LUPNorth of Albert’s LUP

Location Map

North of Albert’s LUPNorth of Albert’s LUP

PD Land Use Plan

North of Albert’s LUPNorth of Albert’s LUP

Impact Fee Committee’s Recommendation

October 17, 2012 - The Road Agreement October 17, 2012 - The Road Agreement Committee (RAC) upheld the County Committee (RAC) upheld the County Engineer’s determination that Road C is not Engineer’s determination that Road C is not an impact fee eligible roadway and therefore an impact fee eligible roadway and therefore not entitled to transportation impact fee not entitled to transportation impact fee credits for Road C improvement costs.credits for Road C improvement costs.

North of Albert’s LUPNorth of Albert’s LUP

Development Review Committee’s Recommendation

November 21, 2012 - The Development Review November 21, 2012 - The Development Review Committee upheld the Road Agreement Committee upheld the Road Agreement Committee’s decision that Road C is not an Committee’s decision that Road C is not an impact fee eligible road and deny use of impact fee eligible road and deny use of impact fee credits for Road C based on impact fee credits for Road C based on Section 23-95(a)(4) of the County Code.Section 23-95(a)(4) of the County Code.

North of Albert’s LUPNorth of Albert’s LUP

Action Requested

Uphold the decision of the County Engineer to Uphold the decision of the County Engineer to deny the Impact Fee eligibility for the deny the Impact Fee eligibility for the proposed APF Road C.proposed APF Road C.

If the BCC overturns the DRC decision, the If the BCC overturns the DRC decision, the APF agreement for North of Albert’s will return APF agreement for North of Albert’s will return to the DRC for modification and a separate to the DRC for modification and a separate Road Agreement may need to be prepared Road Agreement may need to be prepared through the RAC.through the RAC.

North of Albert’s LUPNorth of Albert’s LUP