14
June 2013 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2011082055
June 2013
P U B L I C R E V I E W D R A F T
A P P L E C A M P U S 2 P R O J E C T E N V I R O N M E N T A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
S T A T E C L E A R I N G H O U S E N O . 2 0 1 1 0 8 2 0 5 5
NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND PUBLIC HEARING
FOR THE APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT State Clearinghouse #: 2011082055
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Cupertino, as Lead Agency, has completed a Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Apple Campus 2 Project (project). The proposed project is the development of a new corporate campus on an approximately 176-acre site in the City of Cupertino. PUBLIC MEETING: A public meeting to receive comments on the Draft EIR will be held on June 26, 2013, at 6:30 p.m. at Community Hall, located at 10350 Torre Avenue (next to the Cupertino Library). Please check the project website at: www.cupertino.org/applecampus2 or call (408) 777-3308 prior to the meeting for updated information in the event of changes. You may also sign up at the website to receive project updates. PUBLIC REVIEW TIMELINE: The public review period for the Draft EIR begins June 6, 2013 and ends July 22, 2013 at 5:30 p.m. PST. Responses to all written comments regarding the adequacy of the Draft EIR received during the public review period will be provided in the Final EIR expected to be published later in 2013. SUBMITTING COMMENTS: Written comments may be submitted in one of the following ways:
1. Electronically: You are encouraged to use the online comment form at www.cupertino.org/applecampus2.
2. In-person or by mail: 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014
3. Email: [email protected]
4. Fax: (408) 777-3333.
Direct all comments to the attention of: The Department of Community Development, Re: Apple Campus 2. DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY: The Draft EIR is available at: www.cupertino.org/applecampus2. Copies of the Draft EIR are also available for review Monday through Thursday, between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. and Friday, between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., at the City of Cupertino City Hall, Main Lobby and the downstairs Lobby, 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014, except on specified holidays. Copies of the Draft EIR in paper or electronic format may be purchased at the Cupertino City Hall. The Draft EIR is also available for review at:
• Cupertino Library, 10800 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, CA 95014
• Sunnyvale Library, 665 W. Olive Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94086
• Central Park Library, 2635 Homestead Road, Santa Clara, CA 95051
• Mission Library, 1098 Lexington Street in Santa Clara, CA 95050
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CITY HALL
10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255
(408) 777-3308 • FAX (408) 777-3333
• Saratoga Library, 13650 Saratoga Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070
• Los Altos Library, 13 S. San Antonio Road, Los Altos, CA 94024
• Woodland Library, 1975 Grant Road, Los Altos, CA 94024
• Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Library, 150 E. San Fernando Street, San Jose, CA 95112
• San Jose Public Library West Valley Branch, 1243 San Tomas Aquino Road, San Jose, CA 95117
• San Jose Public Library Calabazas Branch, 1230 S. Blaney Avenue, San Jose CA 95129
PROJECT LOCATION: The approximately 176-acre project site is located in the City of Cupertino and consists of an area generally bordered by East Homestead Road on the north; adjacent properties to the east of North Tantau Avenue on the east; Interstate 280 (I-280) and The Hamptons apartment community on the south; and North Wolfe Road on the west. Pruneridge Avenue extends through the site on a roughly east/west alignment. The project site currently contains approximately 2,657,000 feet of office and research and development buildings, some of which are occupied by Apple and formerly used by Hewlett-Packard. Calabazas Creek crosses the southeastern portion of the site. (The project site consists of the following Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs): 316-07-044, 316-07-045, 316-07-046, 316-06-045, 316-06-046, 316-06-053, 316-06-052, 316-06-048, 316-06-033, 316-06-051, 316-06-050, 316-06-049, 316-09-028, 316-09-019, 316-09-027, 316-18-035, 316-18-012, 316-18-025, 316-18-027, 316-18-026, 316-06-039, 316-06-038). Please refer to Figure 1 for a local and regional map showing the location of the project. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed project is development of the Apple 2 Campus. The project would result in the demolition of all existing structures within the project site (consisting of approximately 2,657,000 square feet of building space) and the ultimate construction of 3,420,000 square feet of office, research, and development uses; 245,000 square feet of auditorium, fitness center, and Valet Parking Reception uses; 92,000 square feet of utility plants; and parking and ancillary buildings. In addition, Apple is requesting that a segment of Pruneridge Avenue be vacated by the City to allow for the development of a secure and unified campus. Development of the proposed project would require amendments to the City of Cupertino General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, a Vacation and Land Purchase Agreement, Utility Relocation and Easement Agreements, architectural and site approval, and various other City approvals, possibly including a Development Agreement. The proposed project could require additional discretionary permits or approvals from other non-City governmental entities. SIGNIFICANT ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS: The Draft EIR provides an evaluation of the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project and recommends mitigation measures to reduce impacts to a less-than-significant level. The project would result in significant environmental impacts in the following topical areas: Planning Policy; Land Use; Biological Resources; Cultural Resources; Geology, Soils, and Seismicity; Hydrology and Water Quality; Hazards and Hazardous Materials; Transportation and Circulation; Noise; Air Quality; and Public Services and Utilities. While most identified impacts would be reduced to a less-than-significant level with the implementation of identified mitigation measures, impacts in the following topical areas would remain significant and unavoidable, even after the implementation of feasible mitigation measures: Planning Policy; Land Use; Transportation and Circulation; Air Quality; and Public Services and Utilities. A portion of the project site is on lists of hazardous materials sites enumerated under Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. QUESTIONS: If you have any questions about this project, please contact the Department of Community Development at (408) 777-3308 or email [email protected].
Kaiser SantaKaiser SantaClara MedicalClara Medical
CenterCenter
Kaiser SantaClara Medical
Center
Pruneridge Ave
MarinCounty 24
17
1
9
9
280
880
680
101
580
PACIFIC OCEAN
HAYWARDHAYWARD
SAN MATEOSAN MATEO
BERKELEY
HAYWARD
SAN JOSECUPERTINO
LOS GATOS
PALO ALTO
SAN MATEO
PROJECTLOCATION
SAN FRANCISCO
LOCATIONREGIONAL
Project Site Boundary
feet
10000 500
Apple Campus 2 Project EIRProject Location MapSOURCES: GOOGLE MAPS; LSA ASSOCIATES, INC., 2011.
I:\COC1101 Apple Campus 2\figures\NOA\Fig_1.ai (6/3/13)
FIGURE 1
THIS EIR IS SUBJECT TO CHAPTER 6.5 (COMMENCING WITH SECTION
21178) OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE, WHICH PROVIDES, AMONG
OTHER THINGS, THAT ANY JUDICIAL ACTION CHALLENGING THE
CERTIFICATION OF THE EIR OR THE APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT
DESCRIBED IN THE EIR IS SUBJECT TO THE PROCEDURES SET FORTH IN
SECTION 21185* OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE AND MUST BE FILED
WITH THE COURT OF APPEAL.** A COPY OF CHAPTER 6.5 OF THE
PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE IS INCLUDED AS AN APPENDIX TO THIS EIR.
* THIS LANGUAGE IS PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 21187 OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE. PLEASE NOTE THAT SECTION 21187 REFERS TO “THE PROCEDURES SET FORTH IN SECTION 21178.2 OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE.” HOWEVER, THERE IS NO SECTION 21178.2. INSTEAD, THE RELEVANT PROCEDURES ARE SET FORTH IN SECTION 21185 OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE.
** PLEASE NOTE THAT PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21185
STATES IN PART THAT “THE ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEAL WITH GEOGRAPHIC JURISDICTION OVER THE PROJECT.” THAT CODE SECTION IS THE SUBJECT OF LITIGATION COMMENCED IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ALAMEDA COUNTY (PLANNING & CONSERVATION LEAGUE V. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CASE NO. RG12626904). ON APRIL 9, 2013, THE COURT ISSUED A STATEMENT OF DECISION DETERMINING THAT THE JURISDICTIONAL RESTRICTION IN PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21185(a)(1) IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL. AS OF MAY 23, 2013, THAT LITIGATION WAS STILL PENDING. THE STATUS OF SECTION 21185(a)(1) MAY OR MAY NOT CHANGE AFTER THE PRINTING OF THIS DOCUMENT. INTERESTED PARTIES SHOULD DETERMINE FOR THEMSELVES THE STATUS OF SECTION 21185(a)(1) WHEN CONTEMPLATING ANY ACTION INVOLVING CHAPTER 6.5 OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE. THE CITY OF CUPERTINO MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS ABOUT THE EFFECT OF THIS LITIGATION ON THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 6.5 OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE.
June 2013
P U B L I C R E V I E W D R A F T
A P P L E C A M P U S 2 P R O J E C T E N V I R O N M E N T A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
S T A T E C L E A R I N G H O U S E N O . 2 0 1 1 0 8 2 0 5 5
Submitted to:
City of Cupertino Community Development Department
10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014
Prepared by:
LSA Associates, Inc. 2215 Fifth Street
Berkeley, California 94710 510.540.7331
P:\COC1101 Apple 2 Campus\PRODUCTS\DEIR\Public\00-Cover-TOC-Glossary.doc (06/03/13) PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 A. PURPOSE OF THIS DRAFT EIR .................................................................................... 1 B. PROPOSED PROJECT ..................................................................................................... 1 C. EIR SCOPE ....................................................................................................................... 2 D. REPORT ORGANIZATION ............................................................................................ 3
II. SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................. 5 A. PROJECT UNDER REVIEW ........................................................................................... 5 B. SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES ..................................... 5 C. SUMMARY TABLE ......................................................................................................... 8
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................ 51 A. PROJECT SITE ............................................................................................................... 51 B. PROJECT SITE HISTORY ............................................................................................. 62 C. PROJECT OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................ 62 D. PROPOSED PROJECT ................................................................................................... 64 E. DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS ..................................................................................... 138 F. USES OF THIS EIR ...................................................................................................... 140
IV. PLANNING POLICY .............................................................................................................. 141 A. CITY OF CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN ................................................................. 141 B. CITY OF CUPERTINO ZONING ORDINANCE ........................................................ 160 C. NORTH VALLCO MASTER PLAN ............................................................................ 165 D. GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS FOR LAND USE NEAR STREAMS ................ 167
V. SETTING, IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES ..................................................... 181 A. LAND USE ................................................................................................................... 185 B. AESTHETICS ............................................................................................................... 193 C. POPULATION, EMPLOYMENT, AND HOUSING ................................................... 217 D. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ....................................................................................... 235 E. CULTURAL RESOURCES .......................................................................................... 263 F. GEOLOGY, SEISMICITY, AND SOILS ..................................................................... 289 G. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY .................................................................. 303 H. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ......................................................... 321 I. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION .............................................................. 347 J. NOISE ........................................................................................................................... 449 K. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS AND SUSTAINABILITY .................................. 481 L. AIR QUALITY ............................................................................................................. 519 M. PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES ........................................................................ 561
L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . J U N E 2 0 1 3
A P P L E C A M P U S 2 P R O J E C T E I RT A B L E O F C O N T E N T S
P:\COC1101 Apple 2 Campus\PRODUCTS\DEIR\Public\00-Cover-TOC-Glossary.doc (06/03/13) PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT ii
VI. ALTERNATIVES .................................................................................................................... 597 A. NO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE ................................................................................... 599 B. PRUNERIDGE AVENUE ALTERNATIVE ................................................................ 605 C. REDUCED CONSTRUCTION ALTERNATIVE ........................................................ 612 D. REDUCED DENSITY ALTERNATIVE...................................................................... 619 E. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED BUT REJECTED ................................................. 625 F. ENVIRONMENTALLY SUPERIOR ALTERNATIVE .............................................. 627
VII. OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS ..................................................................................... 629 A. EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT ........................................................ 629 B. GROWTH-INDUCING IMPACTS .............................................................................. 629 C. SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS .......................... 630 D. SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE CHANGES ............................................................. 631
VIII. REPORT PREPARATION ...................................................................................................... 635 A. REPORT PREPARERS ................................................................................................ 635 B. REFERENCES .............................................................................................................. 636 C. COMMUNICATION .................................................................................................... 650
APPENDICES (Provided on CD located inside the back cover of the Draft EIR) Appendix A: Notice of Preparation and Scoping Letters Appendix B: Transportation Impact Analysis Appendix C: Noise Data Appendix D: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data Appendix E: Air Quality Data Appendix F: Cumulative Projects Appendix G: SB610 Water Supply Assessment Appendix H: Student Generation/Enrollment Reports Appendix I: Public Resources Code Chapter 6.5
L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . J U N E 2 0 1 3
A P P L E C A M P U S 2 P R O J E C T E I RT A B L E O F C O N T E N T S
P:\COC1101 Apple 2 Campus\PRODUCTS\DEIR\Public\00-Cover-TOC-Glossary.doc (06/03/13) PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT iii
FIGURES
Figure III-1: Project Location Map .............................................................................................. 52 Figure III-2: Project Site .............................................................................................................. 53 Figure III-3: Existing and Proposed Trees ................................................................................... 57 Figure III-4: Site Plan .................................................................................................................. 67 Figure III-5a: Site Plan – North ..................................................................................................... 69 Figure III-5b: Site Plan – South ..................................................................................................... 70 Figure III-6a: Representative Sections .......................................................................................... 71 Figure III-6b: Representative Sections .......................................................................................... 72 Figure III-7a: Rendering ................................................................................................................ 73 Figure III-7b: Rendering ................................................................................................................ 74 Figure III-8: Main Building – Representative Plan ..................................................................... 76 Figure III-9a: Main Building – Representative Section (Restaurant) ............................................ 77 Figure III-9b: Main Building – Representative Section (Office) ................................................... 78 Figure III-10a: Fitness Center – Representative Plan ...................................................................... 79 Figure III-10b: Fitness Center – Representative Sections ............................................................... 80 Figure III-11a: Corporate Auditorium – Representative Plan ......................................................... 82 Figure III-11b: Corporate Auditorium – Representative Section .................................................... 83 Figure III-12a: Phase 2 Development –Plan and Section ................................................................ 84 Figure III-12b: Phase 2 Development –Plan and Section ................................................................ 85 Figure III-13: Central Plant – Representative Plan and Section .................................................... 87 Figure III-14: Security Receptions – Representative Plan and Section ......................................... 89 Figure III-15a: Conceptual Landscape Plan – North ....................................................................... 93 Figure III-15b: Conceptual Landscape Plan – South ....................................................................... 94 Figure III-16: Circulation Plan ...................................................................................................... 97 Figure III-17a: Off-Site Street Changes ........................................................................................ 105 Figure III-17b: Off-Site Street Changes ........................................................................................ 106 Figure III-17c: Off-Site Street Changes ........................................................................................ 107 Figure III-17d: Off-Site Street Changes ........................................................................................ 108 Figure III-17e: Off-Site Street Changes ........................................................................................ 109 Figure III-17f: Off-Site Street Changes ........................................................................................ 110 Figure III-18: Existing and Proposed Transit Routes .................................................................. 113 Figure III-19: Existing and Proposed Bike and Pedestrian Systems ........................................... 114 Figure III-20a: Perimeter Bike Facilities ....................................................................................... 115 Figure III-20b: Perimeter Bike Facilities ....................................................................................... 116 Figure III-20c: Perimeter Bike Facilities ....................................................................................... 117 Figure III-20d: Perimeter Bike Facilities ....................................................................................... 118 Figure III-20e: Perimeter Bike Facilities ....................................................................................... 119 Figure III-20f: Perimeter Bike Facilities ....................................................................................... 120 Figure III-21a: Main Parking Structure Representative Plan – Levels B1 and 1 ......................... 123 Figure III-21b: Main Parking Structure Representative Section .................................................. 124 Figure III-22a: North Tantau Parking Structure North ................................................................. 126 Figure III-22b: North Tantau Parking Structure South ................................................................. 127 Figure III-23: Potential Recycled Water Infrastructure ............................................................... 131 Figure IV-1: General Plan Land Use Designations .................................................................... 143 Figure IV-2: Zoning Designations ............................................................................................. 161 Figure IV-3: Mitigation Measure PLAN-3 ................................................................................ 162 Figure V.B-1: Photo Viewpoint Map ........................................................................................... 195
L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . J U N E 2 0 1 3
A P P L E C A M P U S 2 P R O J E C T E I RT A B L E O F C O N T E N T S
P:\COC1101 Apple 2 Campus\PRODUCTS\DEIR\Public\00-Cover-TOC-Glossary.doc (06/03/13) PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT iv
Figure V.B-2: Visual Simulations, Viewpoint 1, Wolfe Road Entrance ...................................... 196 Figure V.B-3: Visual Simulations, Viewpoint 2, I-280 Westbound ............................................ 197 Figure V.B-4: Visual Simulations, Viewpoint 3, East Pruneridge Avenue ................................. 198 Figure V.B-5: Visual Simulations, Viewpoint 4, East Homestead Road and North
Tantau Avenue ...................................................................................................... 199 Figure V.B-6: Visual Simulations, Viewpoint 5, East Homestead Road and North
Wolfe Road ........................................................................................................... 200 Figure V.B-7: Visual Simulations, Viewpoint 6, Peacock Avenue.............................................. 201 Figure V.B-8: Visual Simulations, Viewpoint 7, Tantau Avenue Overpass ................................ 202 Figure V.B-9: Visual Simulations, Viewpoint 8, I-280 Eastbound .............................................. 203 Figure V.B-10: Illuminance Calculations for Receptor Locations ................................................. 213 Figure V.C-1: City of Cupertino Population Growth Trend, 1970-2030 ..................................... 218 Figure V.C-2: Residential Location of Current Employees on the Project Site ........................... 226 Figure V.D-1: Representative Biological Resource Photographs ................................................ 245 Figure V.E-1: Glendenning Barn Photographs ............................................................................ 277 Figure V.F-1: Regional Faults ..................................................................................................... 291 Figure V.G-1: Flood Zone ............................................................................................................ 305 Figure V.H-1: Properties on Regulatory Databases of Hazardous Materials Releases
Within 1/4-Mile .................................................................................................... 325 Figure V.H-2: Properties Within Project Site With Phase I and II Environmental Site
Assessments .......................................................................................................... 326 Figure V.I-1: Campus Location and Study Locations ................................................................ 349 Figure V.I-2: Intersection LOS Standards .................................................................................. 355 Figure V.I-3: Existing and Proposed Bicycle Facilities .............................................................. 361 Figure V.I-4: Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Turning Movement Volumes in
Project Vicinity ..................................................................................................... 362 Figure V.I-5: Existing Transit Facilities ..................................................................................... 363 Figure V.I-6: Existing Intersection LOS Results ........................................................................ 371 Figure V.I-7: Project Trip Distribution ....................................................................................... 391 Figure V.I-8: Existing Plus Project Intersection LOS Results .................................................... 392 Figure V.I-9: Background No Project and Background Plus Project Intersection
LOS Results .......................................................................................................... 401 Figure V.I-10: Cumulative No Project and Cumulative Plus Project Intersection
LOS Results .......................................................................................................... 407 Figure V.I-11: Apple TDM Monitoring Process........................................................................... 447 Figure V.J-1: Noise Monitoring Locations ................................................................................. 455 Figure V.J-2: Traffic Noise Level Changes from Existing to Existing Plus Project ................... 469 Figure V.J-3: Traffic Noise Level Changes from Cumulative to Cumulative Plus Project ........ 470 Figure V.K-1: California GHG Emissions by Sector (2000-2009 Average) ................................ 488 Figure V.K-2: Bay Area GHG Emissions by Sector (2007) ........................................................ 489 Figure VI-1: Conceptual Plan for No Project Alternative ......................................................... 601 Figure VI-2: Conceptual Plan for Pruneridge Avenue Alternative ............................................ 607 Figure VI-3: Conceptual Plan for Reduced Construction Alternative ....................................... 613 Figure VI-4: Conceptual Plan for Reduced Density Alternative ............................................... 621
L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . J U N E 2 0 1 3
A P P L E C A M P U S 2 P R O J E C T E I RT A B L E O F C O N T E N T S
P:\COC1101 Apple 2 Campus\PRODUCTS\DEIR\Public\00-Cover-TOC-Glossary.doc (06/03/13) PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT v
TABLES
Table II-1: Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures from the EIR .................................. 9 Table III-1: Development Summary .......................................................................................... 65 Table III-2: Proposed Building Summary .................................................................................. 66 Table III-3: Required Permits and Approvals .......................................................................... 140 Table IV-1: Applicable General Plan Goals, Policies, and Programs ...................................... 170 Table V.B-1: Illuminance Assessment of Receptor Locations ................................................... 215 Table V.C-1: City of Cupertino Historical Population Growth .................................................. 217 Table V.C-2: ABAG Population and Household Projections for Cupertino and Santa
Clara County 2010-2030, ...................................................................................... 218 Table V.C-3: City of Cupertino and Santa Clara County Regional Housing Needs
Allocation, 2007-2014 .......................................................................................... 220 Table V.C-4: Housing and Employment Data – Cupertino and Santa Clara County ................. 223 Table V.C-5: Projected Housing Demand by City Based on Residential Location of
Current Apple Employees ..................................................................................... 227 Table V.C-6: Project Housing Demand Compared To RHNA ................................................... 229 Table V.C-7: Housing and Employment Data – Without and With Project ............................... 230 Table V.D-1: Special-Status Species Known to Occur or Potentially Occurring in the
Vicinity of the Project Site .................................................................................... 250 Table V.F-1: Modified Mercalli Scale ....................................................................................... 293 Table V.H-1: Properties on Regulatory Databases of Hazardous Materials Releases Within
¼-Mile of the Project Site ..................................................................................... 323 Table V.I-1: Signalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions Using Average Control
Vehicular Delay .................................................................................................... 353 Table V.I-2: Intersection LOS Standards .................................................................................. 353 Table V.I-3: Freeway Segment Level of Service Definitions.................................................... 354 Table V.I-4: Existing Pedestrian and Bicycle Counts on Pruneridge Avenue .......................... 360 Table V.I-5: Existing Transit Service Summary ....................................................................... 365 Table V.I-6: Apple’s Existing TDM Strategies ......................................................................... 369 Table V.I-7: Existing Freeway Segment Levels of Service ....................................................... 374 Table V.I-8: Trip Generation ..................................................................................................... 388 Table V.I-9: Levels of Service for Intersections Operating Unacceptably under Existing
Plus Project Conditions ......................................................................................... 393 Table V.I-10: Existing Plus Project Freeway Segment Levels of Service .................................. 396 Table V.I-11: Levels of Service for Intersections Operating Unacceptably under
Background Plus Project Conditions .................................................................... 400 Table V.I-12: Levels of Service for Intersections Operating Unacceptably under
Cumulative Plus Project Conditions ..................................................................... 410 Table V.I-13: Wolfe Road VISSIM Approach Delays and Levels of Service ............................ 415 Table V.I-14: Travel Metric Comparisons of Two Versus Three Left-Turn Lanes on Wolfe
Road Driveway During the PM Peak Hour .......................................................... 417 Table V.I-15: PM Peak Hour Travel Times on Southbound Tantau Avenue .............................. 419 Table V.I-16: Proposed Vehicle Parking Supply......................................................................... 433 Table V.I-17: Transit Center Driveway Level of Service ........................................................... 438 Table V.I-18: Left-Turn Vehicle Evaluation ............................................................................... 439 Table V.J-1: Definitions of Acoustical Terms ........................................................................... 451 Table V.J-2: Typical A-Weighted Sound Levels ....................................................................... 452 Table V.J-3: Typical Vibration Source Levels for Construction Equipment ............................. 453
L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . J U N E 2 0 1 3
A P P L E C A M P U S 2 P R O J E C T E I RT A B L E O F C O N T E N T S
P:\COC1101 Apple 2 Campus\PRODUCTS\DEIR\Public\00-Cover-TOC-Glossary.doc (06/03/13) PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT vi
Table V.J-4: Short-Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results, dBA, October 25, 2011 ........... 454 Table V.J-5: Meteorological Conditions During Ambient Noise Monitoring ........................... 454 Table V.J-6: Existing Traffic Noise Levels ............................................................................... 457 Table V.J-7: Summary of EPA Noise Levels ............................................................................ 458 Table V.J-8: Summary of Human Effects in Areas Exposed to 55 dBA Ldn ........................... 458 Table V.J-9: City of Cupertino Noise and Land Use Compatibility Standards ......................... 461 Table V.J-10: City of Cupertino Example Maximum Permissible Noise Levels ........................ 462 Table V.J-11: Existing and Existing Plus Project Traffic Noise Levels, dBA CNEL ................. 467 Table V.J-12: Cumulative and Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Noise Levels, dBA CNEL ...... 468 Table V.J-13: Existing and Existing Plus Construction Traffic Noise Levels at 50 feet
from Centerline of Outermost Travel Lane, dBA ................................................. 474 Table V.J-14: Typical Construction Equipment Maximum Noise Levels, Lmax .......................... 476 Table V.K-1: Global Warming Potential of Greenhouse Gases ................................................. 482 Table V.K-2: Project Construction Emissions (Metric Tons) ..................................................... 504 Table V.K-3: GHG Emissions (Metric Tons Per Year) .............................................................. 510 Table V.K-4: Project Compliance with Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Strategies ......... 513 Table V.L-1: Sources and Health Effects of Air Pollutants ........................................................ 520 Table V.L-2: Ambient Air Quality at the 22601 Voss Ave, Cupertino, Monitoring Station ...... 526 Table V.L-3: State and Federal Ambient Air Quality Standards ................................................ 531 Table V.L-4: Bay Area Attainment Status .................................................................................. 535 Table V.L-5: Project Construction Emissions in Pounds Per Day ............................................. 546 Table V.L-6: Regional Emissions from Existing On-Site Uses ................................................. 548 Table V.L-7: Project Regional Emissions .................................................................................. 549 Table V.L-8: Construction Equipment TACs ............................................................................. 554 Table V.L-9: Inhalation Health Risks from Project Construction to Off-Site Receptors ........... 557 Table V.L-10: Cumulative Construction Health Risk Impacts ..................................................... 559 Table V.L-11: Cumulative Operational Health Risk Impacts ...................................................... 560 Table V.M-1: Cupertino Union School District Capacity and Enrollment Data ......................... 564 Table V.M-2: Fremont Union High School District Capacity and Enrollment Data ................... 565 Table V.M-3: Santa Clara Unified School District Capacity and Enrollment Data .................... 566 Table V.M-4: City of Cupertino Existing Park and Recreation Areas ........................................ 567 Table V.M-5: Cal Water Planned Water Supply and Demand (af) ............................................. 570 Table V.M-6: Projected Cal Water Supply for Single and Multiple Dry-Years (afy) ................. 571 Table V.M-7: WSA Potable & Non-Potable Water Demand Forecast for Proposed
Project (afy) .......................................................................................................... 586 Table V.M-8: Water Demand Projections for Cal Water and Typical Commercial
Development Scenario (af) ................................................................................... 586 Table VI-1: Summary of Principal Characteristics of Alternatives .................................................... 598
![Paul Shoup Houseteamjennings.net/ShoupHouse/PaulShoupHouse.pdf · Los Altos Designated Historic Landmark[2] Paul Shoup House circa 1920 Location: 500 University Avenue, Los Altos,](https://static.documents.pub/doc/80x56/5f3321914de600754461e17f/paul-shoup-los-altos-designated-historic-landmark2-paul-shoup-house-circa-1920.jpg)
