Public Safety, from Narrowband to Broadband
Dilemmas and Challenges
Directorate for Emergency Communication
Director Tor Helge Lyngstøl
When every second counts 14th November 2013
Presentation background
• Norway’s public safety TETRA radio network, Nødnett, will have nation wide coverage in 2015, approx. 2100 base stations. Network based on Motorola Dimetra version 8.
• Nødnett major investment. Government finance radio network, terminals and more than 300 control rooms.
• Minister of Justice 5. Sept. 2013: “Nødnett one of the most important initiatives for emergency preparedness in Norway ever”
• New Government 7. Oct. 2013: “Nødnett essential for Norway’s emergency preparedness”
• Nødnett heavily criticised for lack of data capacity
Requirements to present
Public Safety Radio Systems
• Public control – dedicated networks
– But Go-Go, Co-Co and Go-Co
• Coverage everywhere
– outdoor, indoor, tunnels (Norway p.t. 290), Air-Ground-Air
• Specific functions
– Fast group communication, one-to-one, data
• Resilient Design
– Power – transmission – fall-back BS - DMO
• Service Availability always
Mission critical vs. non mission critical
ECC Report 102:
Mission critical situations
Where human life, rescue operations and law enforcement are at stake and public safety organizations cannot afford the risk of having transmission failures in their voice and data communications …..
Non mission critical situations
Where communication needs are non critical: human life and properties are not at stake, administrative tasks for which the time and security elements are not critical.
ECC: Electronic Communications Committee within the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT)
Public safety use scenarios
Day-to-day operations Functionality and coverage
Large emergency/public events Capacity, training, working routines
Disasters Requires huge investments in resilience
Nødnett Resilient Transmission layout Switch
Switch
Switch
Ca. 300 rings and 600 access points to
transmission network
Uses existing infrastructure
Power back-up: • 85 % on 8 hours
with lead batteries • 15 % on 48 hours,
mostly with diesel generators
Base stations connected in ring
structures
Power back-up in Europe
Country Minimum back-up Back-up on prioritized base stations
Norway
(ca. 2100 BS)
8 hours at 85 % of the base stations 48 hours at 15 % of the base stations
Sweden – upgraded in 2012
(ca. 1800 BS)
24 hours at 52 % of the base stations 7 days at 48 % of the BS
Denmark
(not a lot of power outages due to
weather conditions – a large part of
the power network is in the ground
+ few forest areas)
(ca. 500 BS)
4 hours at 72 % of the base stations «Infinite» at 28 % of the base stations.
These cover almost all of the country.
Finland
(ca. 1.350 BS)
6 hours at all the base stations 200 base stations connected to
generators
Germany
(ca. 4.400 BS)
2 hours Prioritized parts of the network have
more back-up
UK
(ca. 3.500 BS)
6 hours at 60 % of the base stations 5-7 days at 40 % of the base stations
Data traffic in Nødnett
• It is commonly expressed that bit rates far greater than what TETRA can offer is strongly desired
• BUT: Nødnett is rolled out now, with components that are available now (IP core network)
• Therefore, Nødnett is planned with TEDS which provides the highest bit rates available in TETRA networks
• The majority of smart data applications of interest to emergency agencies will perform well over TEDS
• Applications developed for TEDS can continue to be used as higher bit rates become available – they will just perform better
TETRA data services comparison
Single-slot packet data Multi-slot packet data TEDS
Downloading a 10 kB file...
TEDS ≈
1 second
MSPD ≈
7 seconds
SSPD ≈
28 seconds
Functionality expectations to future PSRN
– Group Calls, Private Calls and SDS
• Short set up time
• Good voice quality with noise reduction
• Security requirements to Authentication and Wiretapping
– Functionality built on high speed data capacity and availability also during disasters and large events 1)
• Medium and low speed dedicated data application for the agencies
• Video transmission up- and down-link
• Wide range of high capacity specially designed applications
1) Ref. application matrix from LEWP / CEPT / ETSI
Building blocks
Applications
User equipment (Hardware and Software)
System infrastructure
PSRN
Voice
Positioning
Messaging
TETRA - TEDS
Pictures
Frequencies 350 MHz 2500 MHz
Commercial operators
GSM - GPRS - UMTS - LTE
Video
Applications
CDMA
Common infrastructure (masts, electricity, transmission lines)
PPDR BB “User requirements”
Mobile Broadband user requirements for public safety and civil protection • Several projects inside European countries • Assembled by Law Enforcement Working Party in the “User
Requirement Matrix” • Developed further by TCCA, ETSI and CEPT
PPDR BB frequency requirements
Spectrum requirements to support Mobile Broadband for public safety and civil protection – “700 MHz at the moment the most promising spectrum” • Harmonised spectrum World Wide
• CEPT and ETSI have calculated PPDR need for data to 2*10MHZ • Harmonisation in Europe and World Wide is a target to;
• Facilitate economy of scale in equipment production and • Enable cross border communication • USA, Canada, Australia and Asia have dedicated spectrum in the
700MHz band for PPDR already • For later Voice introduction in LTE existing 400MHz band is a candidate
European Public Safety Radio Networks
Country Area (km2) Population (mill.)
Density ( pr. km2)
No. of TETRA base stations
Inhab./base station
Holland 41.000 16,8 404 510 33.000
Denmark 43.000 5,5 128 500 11.000
Belgium 31.000 10,4 335 580 18.000
Norway 324.000 5 15,6 2.100 2.400
Finland 338.000 5,4 16 1.350 4.000
Sweden 449.000 9 20 1.800 5.000
France* 549.000 65 118 1.900 34.200
UK 244.000 61 250 3.500 17.400
Germany 357.000 82 230 4.400 18.600
* France uses TETRAPOL with 1.400 BS in 400 MHz and 500 BS in 80 MHz
Oldest networks
Functionality in present networks specified 1998-2005
Dedicated LTE PPDR networks realistic?
• Everything depends on access to spectrum
• In countries with older radio networks, high density of population and relatively low area the investment may be acceptable
• In larger countries with low density of population investment in dedicated networks with national coverage will be very costly
• Hybrid dedicated/commercial networks probably financially most realistic in most countries in a short perspective
Benefits with Commercial networks
• Public safety use of commercial networks expected to give both access to the necessary functionality and fantastic economy of scale – much lower cost is expected
• For society service availability for public safety is crucial. Incidents have to be handled even in situations where mobile networks are overloaded and during extreme weather conditions
• Society’s expectations to public safety services go far beyond normal mobile user’s requirements to communication services
Challenges for resilience
• PSRN is to a large extent based on existing telecom infrastructure
• The root cause of mobile / radio network outages is nearly always power outages or transmission failures
• Resilience is key issue in dedicated public safety radio networks. Most commercial networks have very limited resilience
From Dedicated to Commercial networks
• PPDR-functionality must be included in the LTE standard
– Thereafter this functionality has to be included in the manufacturers’ systems and offered to the market
– Additionally the functionality must be implemented in the Commercial networks
• Why should commercial operators include PPDR functionality in their networks when only 0,5 % of their customers want it?
• What is the incentive for commercial operators for installing more resilience when only 0,5 % of the end users demand it?
Regulatory challenges
– Spectrum is limited – regulators will question whether it is right to dedicate spectrum to public safety networks when demand for commercial services is high and traffic is normally low in public safety networks
– What conditions could be applied to commercial parties that get spectrum permits in certain bands?
• Requirements to PPDR functionality to be implemented?
• “Free ride”/priority for Public Safety?
• National/international roaming for public safety?
Facts
• Present PPDR Radio Systems are dedicated networks
• Public expectation that these networks have built in resilience
• Present networks lack high speed data functionality
• Likely that LTE will be the future mobile technology also for PPDR
• PPDR requirements can technically most probably be satisfied in either dedicated or public LTE networks
• Commercial networks not prepared for mission critical use (“Network is not an emergency network”)?
Conclusion
• Important for society that PPDR always have access to reliable communication
• Governments’ options:
– Pay operators for required PPDR functionality and resilience
– Use of regulatory instruments and dedicate spectrum to PPDR use
• Reliable radio communication for public safety is a political issue that must be addressed as an integrated part of how the mobile market should be regulated in the future
• Naive to expect that commercial operators will deliver a sufficiently resilient service without being paid significant amounts