Date post: | 18-Jan-2017 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | david-horowitz |
View: | 213 times |
Download: | 1 times |
PUBLIC SERVICE PROFILESAuthor(s): David HorowitzSource: ABA Journal, Vol. 72, No. 7 (July 1, 1986), p. 84Published by: American Bar AssociationStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20758861 .
Accessed: 13/06/2014 04:25
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
.
American Bar Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to ABA Journal.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 195.34.79.79 on Fri, 13 Jun 2014 04:26:00 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Inside ABA; PUBLIC SERVICE PROFILES
Solutions to the drunk driving conundrum
By David Horowitz
What strides has the legal profession made toward solving the drunk driving problem? People with a low opinion of
lawyers frequently come up with a nega tive answer to that question. They are
prone to see defense lawyers, judges and even prosecutors as obstructing "tough" laws and effective enforcement.
The ABA Section on Criminal Justice's Drunk Driving Project should help change that perception. By working to create a greater understanding of the
drunk driving problem, the project's goal is to bring about better laws and a lower accident rate.
The courts' dilemma Drunk driving laws have changed radi
cally in the past few years. Courts, legis latures, public interest groups and the
public have been searching diligently for solutions.
The search raises a multitude of ques tions. What laws will work best to curb drunk driving? How strict can these laws be and still be acceptable to society? The
legal limitations of sanctions and enforce
ment measures pose a continuing prob lem.
Social scientists and researchers, backed by government grants, have been quick to provide statistical analyses of drunk driving based on surveys, accident records and other data. The literature is
replete with these studies. Few of them, however, address the key legal issues? enforceability, effectiveness and deter
rence.
Furthermore, almost none of the stud
ies have tapped the unique insight of
lawyers and judges. Besides knowing the law well, these professionals possess an
intuitive knowledge of drunken drivers' behavior gained from years of dealing with them as clients or defendants.
A fresh look at the problem The ABA Section on Criminal Justice's
Drunk Driving Project capitalized on the
insight that lawyers and judges have about the problem of drunk driving.
Without any pretenses of being scientific,
David Horowitz, a judge on the Superi or Court in Los Angeles, Calif., was chairman of the Advisory Board for the Section on Criminal Justice's Drunk Driving Project.
U
the one-year project gleaned information and opinions from lawyers and judges who deal daily with drunk drivers.
While the project drew heavily on re search literature and case law, another
important ingredient was added?input from state legislators. This was consid
ered vital because proposals for drunk driving laws never will be enacted if
legislators don't think they are viable. A highlight of the project was a suc
cessful three-day conference held exclu
sively for state legislators. Lawmakers
from 35 states attended. The participants contributed much useful information to
the project as well as enlightening col
leagues on their experiences in trying to
improve drunk driving laws.
A monograph worth reading The project culminated in the prepara
tion of a monograph that is unique in several ways.
It provides suggestions to help improve a wide range of laws related to drunk
driving. A conscious effort was made to write it in language comprehensible to
laypersons. The aim was to help the
public understand drunk driving laws and the premises on which they are based. The commentary gives a good overview of these laws, explaining their limitations and also emphasizing the need for a
comprehensive approach involving more than tough laws to solve the problem.
The monograph, which is free, is being distributed by the ABA Section on Crimi nal Justice. ABA members are invited to
request copies and distribute them to
groups they believe would benefit from them. The project is a good example of how members of the bar can use their talents and experience to benefit the pub lic and improve the justice system. It also illustrates the value for ABA members of
working with outside groups. Equally im portant to the project was its financial
backing.
^Journal
Project: To Assess the Effective ness of Laws and Enforcement Techniques Applied to Alcohol Related Traffic Offenses.
Objective: To assist in improving the effectiveness of taws and en forcement techniques applied to alcohol-related traffic offenses. Sponsor: Section on Criminal Jus tice.
Director: Thomas C. Smith, associ ate director, ABA Section oh Crimi nal Justice, 1800 M Street, Wash ington, D.C. 20036, (202) 331-2260.
84 ABA Journal, The Lawyer's Magazine
This content downloaded from 195.34.79.79 on Fri, 13 Jun 2014 04:26:00 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions