1/14/2019
1
Pulmonary Hypertension for the Primary Care ProviderKenneth W. Presberg, MD
Professor of Medicine
Director, PHA Pulmonary Hypertension Comprehensive Care Center,
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine
Froedtert & Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Disclosures: (no direct honorariums; research meetings support) Research PI: Actelion, United Therapeutics.
Review the DEFINITION of pulmonary hypertension (PH)
Discuss the different GROUPS of PH Patients
Examine the PROGNOSIS of PH patients in the different GROUPS
Differentiate the BENEFITS and SIDE EFFECTS of different treatments for PH patients.
Review new guidelines for assessment of ADEQUATE TREATMENT RESPONSE in PAH.
Objectives:
PH with Left HeartDisease
PH with LungDisease and/or
Low Oxygen Levels
“PAH”
MiscellaneousMiscellaneousChronic Thrombosis
(clot) PHChronic Thrombosis
(clot) PH
Pulmonary HypertensionComes in Several Varieties
Right Heart Catheterization: The Definitive Diagnosis:
• Normal Pulmonary Artery (PA) Pressure: 30/15, mean 20 mmHg.
• Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) when mean > 25 mmHg (40/20 mmHg )and Elevated Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR)
Introductory Questions:
Is Pulmonary HTN common?
If so, Which Group?
Is Pulmonary HTN rare, an “orphan” disease
If yes, which Group?
Can Pulmonary HTN be cured?
Are there effective treatments?
Yes, Many patients with left sided heart failure have Group II Pulmonary HTN.
Yes, Group I PAH Pulmonary HTN remains an uncommon disease.
Chronic PE patients who have a successful surgery return to near normal: OSA patients on CPAP.
Yes, particularly for Group I PAH patients now.
PH with Left HeartDisease
PH with LungDisease and/or
Low Oxygen Levels
“PAH”
MiscellaneousMiscellaneousChronic Thrombosis
(clot) PHChronic Thrombosis
(clot) PH
Pulmonary HypertensionComes in Several Varieties
1/14/2019
2
Epidemiology of PH by Echo Single echo lab / Australian community of 165,450
Etiology of PH noted on echocardiogram
N=936 of 10,314 patients with echo PASP >40 mm Hg.Strange G et al. Heart. 2012;98:1805‐1811.
Miscellaneous, 2.7%
Lung disease,Sleep‐related
hypoventilation,9.3%
CTEPH, 2.0%
PAH, 2.7% Unknown,15.4%
Left heartdisease, 67.9%
Right Heart Catheterization: The Definitive Diagnosis:
• Normal Pulmonary Artery (PA) Pressure: 30/15, mean 20 mmHg.
• Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) when mean > 25 mmHg (40/20 mmHg )and Elevated Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR)
Pulmonary Hemodynamics:Pre‐capillary and Post‐capillary Patterns
Pulmonary ArterialPre-Capillary
Pulmonary VenousPost-CapillaryLeft Heart Disease
5th World Symposium on PH:Classification /GROUPS1. Pulmonary arterial hypertension
1.1 Idiopathic PAH1.2 Heritable PAH
1.2.1 BMPR21.2.2 ALK1, ENG, Smad 9, CAV1, KCNK31.2.3 Unknown
1.3 Drug- and toxin-induced1.4 Associated with
1.4.1 Connective tissue disease1.4.2 HIV infection1.4.3 Portal hypertension1.4.4 Congenital heart diseases (update)1.4.5 Schistosomiasis
1’. Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease and/orpulmonary capillary hemangiomatosis
1’’. Persistent PH of the newborn
2. PH due to left heart disease
2.1 LV systolic dysfunction2.2 LV diastolic dysfunction2.3 Valvular disease2.4 Congenital/acquired left heart inflow/outflow tract
obstruction and congenital cardiomyopathies
3. PH due to lung diseases and/or hypoxia
3.1 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease3.2 Interstitial lung disease3.3 Other pulmonary diseases with mixed restrictive
and obstructive pattern3.4 Sleep-disordered breathing3.5 Alveolar hypoventilation disorders3.6 Chronic exposure to high altitude3.7 Developmental lung diseases (update)
4. Chronic thromboembolic PH. CTEPH
5. PH with unclear multifactorial mechanisms
5.1 Hematological disorders: chronic hemolytic anemia, myeloproliferative disorders, splenectomy
5.2 Systemic disorders: sarcoidosis, pulmonary histiocytosis, lymphangioleiomyomatosis,
5.3 Metabolic disorders: glycogen storage disease, Gaucher disease, thyroid disorders
5.4 Others: tumoral obstruction, fibrosing mediastinitis, chronic renal failure, segmental PH
Simonneau G et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:D34-D41.
Physical Examination Findings
Presence of PH
• Loud second heart sound
• RV heave
• Heart murmur
• RV gallop
Presence of RV Failure
• Distended neck veins
• Enlarged liver
• Swollen feet and ankles
• Swollen abdomen
Pulmonary Hypertension Diagnosis
REVEAL. Brown LM et al. Chest. 2011;140:19-26. Adapted from McLaughlin VV et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1573-1619.
Is There a Reason to Suspect PH? Clinical Presentation
HistoryNonspecific Complaints Diagnostic Tests
• Dyspnea (86%)
• Fatigue (27%)
• Chest pain (22%)
• Edema (22%)
• Syncope (17%)
• Dizziness (15%)
• Cough (14%)
• Palpitations(13%)
• H & P, CXR, ECG: Suspicion, Risk Factors
• PFT, ABG, Overnight/ Sleep study.
• VQ scan best screening test for Chronic PE. CT Angiocomplementary tests.
• Echo: Structure, function, ESTIMATE hemodynamics
• Exercise Testing: CPET, 6MW
• Heart CatheterizationREVEAL. Brown LM et al. Chest. 2011;140:19-26. Adapted from McLaughlin VV et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1573-1619.
1/14/2019
3
Pulmonary Hypertension Risk Factor List:
Cardiovascular Disease
Lung Disease
Sleep History
Thyroid Disease: autoimmune
Liver disease
Collagen vascular disease
Blood, clotting disorders, splenectomy
Viral Exposure Risk: HIV, Hepatitis.
Recreational Drug Use: Cocaine, Meth, other amphetamines.
Diet Pill, Weight loss prescription:
Is There a Reason to Suspect PAH? Echo• RV enlargement
• RA enlargement
• Septal straightening
• Loss of IVC inspiratory collapse
• Tricuspid regurgitation
• Pericardial effusion
• Decreased RV systolic dysfunction
– TAPSE (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion)
TAPSE 1.5 cmTAPSE 2.3 cm
Relatively preservedRV function
RV dysfunction
McLaughlin VV et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1573-1619.
IVC Collapse PH.avi
Estimation of RV Systolic Pressure (RVSP)
RVSP = 4(velocity of TR)2 + RA pressure= 4(4)2 + 20= ~84 mm Hg Echocardiogram prediction of PH: ERS 2015
PA 30
PA 35‐45
PA > 45
Diagnostic algorithm.
Nazzareno Galiè et al. Eur Respir J 2015;46:903-975©2015 by European Respiratory Society
Case: TN
60 yo female
Alcohol Abuse, Osteopenia
Fall and Pelvic fracture with severe left femur fracture.
Pre‐op evaluation done.
Referred 2013 for evaluation of abnormal echo with RV enlargement and PH suggested by echo.
Normal VQ scan, US no cirrhosis.
Mild elevation in ANA.
Echo: Mild RV enlargement, Mild RV systolic Dysfunction, Mild elevation in PASP.
1/14/2019
4
Mild PAH20.avi
Mild PAH20.avi
Mild PAH56.avi
Mild PAH
Diastole in short-axis view
Systole in short-axis view
TR jet
Apical 4-chamber view
IVS
RV
LV
Case TN (2)
Right Heart Catheterization done. RA pressure 4, PA pressure mean 26, PAWP 9 (all mmHg). CI 2.8 L/min m2.
Mild PAH , Idiopathic with preserved RV function.
Recommended to complete surgery and then return promptly for treatment. LOW RISK Status to start.
Surgery Successful with no complications.
Lost to fu for period of time.
PH Case -DS
60 year old manager
DOE for months: Stairs at work and Lawn work now more difficult. WHO functional class?
PMH: Viral CM; ? HTN on ARB
FH: Estranged sister with lung condition; on pump medication, oxygen and now pills
SH: Manager, Layoffs coming, Insurance?
Exam: JVP 4 cm, Loud P2, TR Murmur, RV impulse,noedema.
Walk test: 440 m
VQ scan: Normal
ECG: NSR, R axis, RVH
Case DS
What Diagnoses need to be considered?
What additional tests do you want?
Outside Echo suggests pulmonary hypertension with RV dysfunction.
Case DS
PH Echocardiogram on 03/06/07: Left ventricular EF 40-45%. Mild diastolic dysfunction
was identified. Left atrium appears visually normal (adjusted for BSA 17ml/M2).
Right ventricle is severely enlarged and has severe systolic dysfunction.
Estimated PASP: at least 65 mm Hg. IVC compatible with RAP of 10 mm HG. Agitated saline contrast at rest with Valsalva reveals no shunt.
No pericardial effusion is seen.
Case DS Right heart catheterization on 04/16/07 at FMLH:
RA Press 7; RV Press 93/13; PA Press 94/40/mean 62; PWP Wedge Pressure 12, LV EDP: 10 Cardiac Output CO/ Index Cl: 3.9 lpm/1.95 lpm/m2;
HR:65/min ; PVR: 12.2 WU; Mixed Venous Sat% 62%.
*Vasodilator trial with Nitric Oxide (10 ppm) revealed: No significant change.
Severe Precapillary Pulmonary HTN. Normal LV filling pressures.
1/14/2019
5
Case DS
What Diagnoses to be considered?
Group I PAH. Heritable PAH?, IdiopathicPAH
Are there any barriers to treatment? Insurance.
Lesson 2
WHO Group I PAH Is Rarebut Deadly—
Make the Diagnosis Early
Group I PAH Distributions in the US: REVEAL Registry
Based on Venice Clinical Classification (2003); 2967 patients.Adapted from Badesch DB et al. Chest. 2010;137:376‐387.
Overall Associated
Associated(50.7%)
Idiopathic(46.2%) Connective tissue/
collagen vascular(49.9%)
Heritable (2.7%)
Pulmonaryveno‐occlusive
(0.4%)
Congenitalheart disease(19.5%)
HIV (4.0%)
Other (5.5%)
Drugs/toxins (10.5%)
Portopulmonary (10.6%)
Adapted from: Sitbon O et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:780‐788. D’Alonzo GE et al. Ann Intern Med.1991;115:343‐349. McLaughlin VV et al. Chest. 2004;126:78S‐91S. Benza RL et al, Chest 2012; 142: 448‐456.
Idiopathic PAH: Survival
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 50
20
40
60
80
100
Years of follow‐up
Percentage surviving
NIH registrySitbon historical controlACCP estimate
• Incidence: 2‐6 cases per million in US
• Poor prognosis in an era lacking therapy 50% ‐ 3 year survival.
• Therapeutic options and research efforts now offer more HOPE !
REVEAL Registry 2012, PAH treatment era: 50% ‐ 7 year survival.
Group I PAH: Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension:
Symptoms often nonspecific; average 14‐month delay from initial presentation to diagnosis
Poor prognosis without therapy and close follow‐up
Evaluation must be methodical and include right heart catheterization (RHC)
Prognosis improves with therapy, but PAH remains a progressive fatal disease
Therapies and management strategies continue to evolve
5th World Symposium on PH:Classification1. Pulmonary arterial hypertension
1.1 Idiopathic PAH1.2 Heritable PAH
1.2.1 BMPR21.2.2 ALK1, ENG, SMAD9, CAV1, KCNK31.2.3 Unknown
1.3 Drug- and toxin-induced1.4 Associated with
1.4.1 Connective tissue disease1.4.2 HIV infection1.4.3 Portal hypertension1.4.4 Congenital heart diseases (update)1.4.5 Schistosomiasis
1’. Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease and/orpulmonary capillary hemangiomatosis
1’’. Persistent PH of the newborn
2. PH due to left heart disease
2.1 LV systolic dysfunction2.2 LV diastolic dysfunction2.3 Valvular disease2.4 Congenital/acquired left heart inflow/outflow tract
obstruction and congenital cardiomyopathies
3. PH due to lung diseases and/or hypoxia
3.1 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease3.2 Interstitial lung disease3.3 Other pulmonary diseases with mixed restrictive
and obstructive pattern3.4 Sleep-disordered breathing3.5 Alveolar hypoventilation disorders3.6 Chronic exposure to high altitude3.7 Developmental lung diseases (update)
4. Chronic thromboembolic PH
5. PH with unclear multifactorial mechanisms
5.1 Hematological disorders: chronic hemolytic anemia, myeloproliferative disorders, splenectomy
5.2 Systemic disorders: sarcoidosis, pulmonary histiocytosis, lymphangioleiomyomatosis,
5.3 Metabolic disorders: glycogen storage disease, Gaucher disease, thyroid disorders
5.4 Others: tumoral obstruction, fibrosing mediastinitis, chronic renal failure, segmental PH
Simonneau G et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:D34-D41.
1/14/2019
6
Most Common Cause of Elevated PAPs by Echo: Left Heart DiseaseSymptoms
– paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea
– orthopnea
History
– diabetes
– hypertension
– obesity
– coronary artery disease
– metabolic syndrome
ECG
– atrial fibrillation
– absence of right axis deviation
Echo
– left atrial enlargement
– left ventricular hypertrophy
– normal RA, RV
– abnormal diastolic filling
– mitral or aortic disease
Pulmonary Venous Hypertension/ Left Heart Disease:A Simplified View• Normal, or mildly elevated transpulmonary gradient with
readily apparent cause
– treat underlying cause
• Substantially elevated transpulmonary gradient (PH out of proportion to LHD)
– treat cardiovascular risk factors (including aggressive volume control) as best you can
– improvement in PH may be slow (months)
– No FDA-approved therapies for diastolic dysfunction yet
5th World Symposium on PH:Classification1. Pulmonary arterial hypertension
1.1 Idiopathic PAH1.2 Heritable PAH
1.2.1 BMPR21.2.2 ALK1, ENG, SMAD9, CAV1, KCNK31.2.3 Unknown
1.3 Drug- and toxin-induced1.4 Associated with
1.4.1 Connective tissue disease1.4.2 HIV infection1.4.3 Portal hypertension1.4.4 Congenital heart diseases (update)1.4.5 Schistosomiasis
1’. Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease and/orpulmonary capillary hemangiomatosis
1’’. Persistent PH of the newborn
2. PH due to left heart disease
2.1 LV systolic dysfunction2.2 LV diastolic dysfunction2.3 Valvular disease2.4 Congenital/acquired left heart inflow/outflow tract
obstruction and congenital cardiomyopathies
3. PH due to lung diseases and/or hypoxia
3.1 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease3.2 Interstitial lung disease3.3 Other pulmonary diseases with mixed restrictive
and obstructive pattern3.4 Sleep-disordered breathing3.5 Alveolar hypoventilation disorders3.6 Chronic exposure to high altitude3.7 Developmental lung diseases (update)
4. Chronic thromboembolic PH
5. PH with unclear multifactorial mechanisms
5.1 Hematological disorders: chronic hemolytic anemia, myeloproliferative disorders, splenectomy
5.2 Systemic disorders: sarcoidosis, pulmonary histiocytosis, lymphangioleiomyomatosis,
5.3 Metabolic disorders: glycogen storage disease, Gaucher disease, thyroid disorders
5.4 Others: tumoral obstruction, fibrosing mediastinitis, chronic renal failure, segmental PH
Simonneau G et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:D34-D41.
Sleep-disordered Breathing and PH
• Nocturnal hypoxemia results in pulmonary arterial constriction and remodeling
• PH can occur with either obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) or central sleep apnea
• PH can occur with obstructive sleep apnea in the absence of intrinsic heart or lung disease
• Little correlation in severity of OSA and degree of PH;
• PH is usually Mild; Mean <35 mmHg
Sajkov D et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;149:416-422.
Pulmonary Hypertension in Lung/Respiratory Disease
• May explain worsening symptoms in patient with stable PFTs
• May contribute to exercise limitation: ventilatory vs cardiovascular limitation
• Disproportionately low DLCO may suggest pulmonary vascular disease
• Correlates better with low oxygen levels vs PFTs
• NO approved PH therapies. Positive Small studies or case series. (BUT negative trials)
0
Lettieri CJ et al. Chest. 2006;129:746-752.
PH
No PH (mPAP <25 mm Hg)
p<0.001
N=79No difference in lung volumesLower 6MWD
PH as a Predictor of Survival in Patients With IPF
1000500 1500 2000 2500
Days to event
Cum
ulat
ive
prob
abili
ty o
f sur
viva
l
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1/14/2019
7
5th World Symposium on PH:Classification1. Pulmonary arterial hypertension
1.1 Idiopathic PAH1.2 Heritable PAH
1.2.1 BMPR21.2.2 ALK1, ENG, SMAD9, CAV1, KCNK31.2.3 Unknown
1.3 Drug- and toxin-induced1.4 Associated with
1.4.1 Connective tissue disease1.4.2 HIV infection1.4.3 Portal hypertension1.4.4 Congenital heart diseases (update)1.4.5 Schistosomiasis
1’. Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease and/orpulmonary capillary hemangiomatosis
1’’. Persistent PH of the newborn
2. PH due to left heart disease
2.1 LV systolic dysfunction2.2 LV diastolic dysfunction2.3 Valvular disease2.4 Congenital/acquired left heart inflow/outflow tract
obstruction and congenital cardiomyopathies
3. PH due to lung diseases and/or hypoxia
3.1 COPD3.2 Interstitial lung disease3.3 Other pulmonary diseases with mixed restrictive
and obstructive pattern3.4 Sleep-disordered breathing3.5 Alveolar hypoventilation disorders3.6 Chronic exposure to high altitude3.7 Developmental lung diseases (update)
4. Chronic thromboembolic PH
5. PH with unclear multifactorial mechanisms
5.1 Hematological disorders: chronic hemolytic anemia, myeloproliferative disorders, splenectomy
5.2 Systemic disorders: sarcoidosis, pulmonary histiocytosis, lymphangioleiomyomatosis,
5.3 Metabolic disorders: glycogen storage disease, Gaucher disease, thyroid disorders
5.4 Others: tumoral obstruction, fibrosing mediastinitis, chronic renal failure, segmental PH
Simonneau G et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:D34-D41.
Incidence of CTEPH
• Approximately 3% to 4% 1-2 yr after acute PE (large, Recurrent higher risk)
• USA: 600,000 cases of acute PE each year
• Only 40% to 50% of CTEPH patients have a history of previous episodes of acute PE
• VQ scan identifies old PE better than CTA
McLaughlin VV et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1573-1619.Pengo V et al. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2257-2264.Tapson VF, Humbert M. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2006;3:564-567.
Years
Cu
mul
ativ
e in
cide
nce
of C
TE
PH
0 1 2 3 4 7 8 9 10 115 60.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
Pulmonary Thromboendarterectomy*
*This surgery now offered at Froedtert and MCW
PH Treatment Goals
Fewer/less severe symptomsImproved exercise capacityImproved “hemodynamics” Prevention of clinical worsening (heart failure, admissions, increased SOB)
Improved quality of life (benefits versus side effects)
Improved survival ? Achieve “Low Risk” Status
Chronic Adjuvant Therapies in PAH
Oxygen
• Use to prevent hypoxic vasoconstriction
• Consider exercise, sleep, altitude
• Aim for target saturation >90%
• May not correct hypoxia with shunt
Adapted from: Badesch DB et al. Chest. 2004;126:35S-62S. Badesch DB et al. Chest. 2007;131:1917-1928.McLaughlin VV et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1573-1619.
Chronic Adjuvant Therapies in PAH
Diuretics
• Needed by most patients; hypotension not a contraindication in RV failure ( may need BP support)
Anticoagulation
• Recommended in IPAH
• Observational studies only (2 retrospective, 2 prospective); need to balance unproven benefits with known risks
• INR 1.5 – 2.5
Adapted from: Olsson KM et al. Circulation. 2014; 29:57–65. Fuster V et al. Circulation. 1984;70:580-587. Badesch DB et al. Chest. 2004;126:35S-62S. Badesch DB et al. Chest. 2007;131:1917-1928. McLaughlin VV et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1573-1619.
1/14/2019
8
Selection of Appropriate Therapy:
Group I PAH Patients:Chronology1980s: Calcium Channel Blockers, Diuretics, Oxygen. 1996: IV Epoprostenol (Flolan) ‐ “PPH” only; then 1998 All Group I PAH. 2001: Bosentan (Endothelin Receptor Antag.), first oral drug. Group I PAH2005: Sildenafil (PDE5 Inhibitors), Group I PAH. 2013: Riociguat (sGuanylate Cyclase, GMP) Group I PAH, Group IV
2019: 12 Drugs: Group I PAH, ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐Group IV CTEPH. 1 Drug. Riociguat.
(No Approved Drugs: Group II PH ‐ Heart Disease; Group III PH ‐ Lung Disease)
Evolution From Exercise Capacity to Morbidity and Mortality Randomized Controlled Trials
*Estimated mean study drug exposure. †Estimated median study drug exposure. ‡Estimated target enrollment.PAH=pulmonary arterial hypertension; RCT=randomized controlled trial. Channick RN et al. Lancet. 2001;358:1119-1123. Rubin LJ et al. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:896-903. Galiè N et al. Lancet. 2008;371:2093-2100. Galiè N et al. Circulation. 2008;117:3010-3019. Galiè N et al. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2148-2157. Simonneau G et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165:800-804. McLaughlin VV et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174:1257-1263. Galiè N et al. Circulation. 2009;119:2894-2903. Simonneau G et al. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:521-530. Olschewski H et al.N Engl J Med. 2002;347:322-329. Pulido T et al. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:809-818. Sitbon O et al. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2522-33. Galiè N et al. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:834-44.McLaughlin VV et al. Eur Respir J. 2015;46:405–413
Weeks0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
N=32N=213
N=185N=202N=192N=277N=470N=67
N=405N=267
N=203AIRPACES
PHIRSTSTEP
Simonneau et al (2002)SUPER-1ARIES-2ARIES-1
EARLYBREATHE-1
Study 351
6MWD Trials
n=235TRIUMPHCHEST n=443
FREEDOM-EV n=858
N=742*N=1150*N=545‡†AMBITION
GRIPHONSERAPHIN
COMPASS-2
Morbidity and Mortality Trials
n=344
Mechanisms of Action of Approved Therapies for GROUP I PAH (not other groups)
Adapted from Humbert M et al. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1425‐1436.
cGMP
cAMP
Vasoconstriction and proliferation
Endothelinreceptor A
Endothelin-receptor
antagonists
Endothelinreceptor B
Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor
Vasodilationand antiproliferation
Phosphodiesterase type 5
Vasodilationand antiproliferation
Prostacyclin derivatives
Nitric Oxide
Endothelin-1
Pre-proendothelin
L-arginine
Prostaglandin I2
L-citrulline
Nitric OxidePathway
EndothelinPathway
ProstacyclinPathway
Endothelial cells
Proendothelin
Endothelial cells
Arachidonic acid
Smooth muscle cells
Prostacyclin (prostaglandin I2)
Smooth muscle cells
Exogenous nitric oxide sGC stimulator
PAH Determinants of Risk
McLaughlin VV et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1573-1619. RAP = Right Atrial Press. CI = Cardiac Index
LOWER RISK DETERMINANTS OF RISK HIGHER RISK
NoClinical evidence of
RV failureYes
Gradual Progression of symptoms Rapid
II, III WHO class III, IV
Longer (>400 m) 6MWD Shorter (<300 m)
Peak VO2 >10.4 mL/kg/min CPET Peak VO2 <10.4 mL/kg/min
Minimal RV dysfunction Echocardiography
Pericardial effusion,significant RV
enlargement/dysfunction; RA enlargement
RAP <10 mm Hg;CI >2.5 L/min/m2 Hemodynamics
RAP >20 mm Hg;CI <2.0 L/min/m2
Minimally elevated BNP Significantly elevated
5th World Symposium on PH:Treatment Algorithm
Galiè N et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:D60-D72.AMBITION study, N Engl J Med, 2015*
Sequential, Initial* CombinationTherapy (I-A)
Referral for Lung Transplantation (I-C)
Consider Eligibility for Lung Transplantation
Inadequate Clinical Response
on Maximal Therapy
INITIAL THERAPY WITH PAH-APPROVED DRUGS
PDE-5 I orsGCs
ERAs
Prostanoids
++
+
Balloon Atrial Septostomy (IIa-C)
Inadequate Clinical Response
ERS Risk Assessment 2015
1/14/2019
9
Case DS
What Diagnoses to be considered?
Group I PAH. Heritable PAH?, IdiopathicPAH
Is this patient HIGH risk or LOW risk at present?
“ A tweener ”
High because: Low normal Cardiac Ouput. High BNP
Low because: normal RA pressure, Functional class II symptoms, no heart failure.
“INTERMEDIATE RISK” Are there any barriers to treatment? Insurance.
PH Case DS Treated with Sildenafil alone with improvement;
Escalated dose to 80 mg TID
Walk Test 660 m, no desat
WHO functional Class I most days. II on some chore days.
BNP 12
Echo: Severe RV enlargement; Low normal TAPSE. Right Heart Cath 11/08 on Revatio 80 TID. RA 7, PA 91/33 mean 55, PWP 8, CO5.4 CI 2.7 PVR
8.6, MVO2 sat 71, AVO2 diff 5.0 New Medication to discuss?
cGMP
cAMP
Vasoconstriction and proliferation
Endothelinreceptor A
Endothelin-receptor
antagonists
Endothelinreceptor B
Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor
Vasodilationand antiproliferation
Phosphodiesterase type 5
Vasodilationand antiproliferation
Prostacyclin derivatives
Nitric Oxide
Endothelin-1
Pre-proendothelin
L-arginine
Prostaglandin I2
L-citrulline
Nitric OxidePathway
EndothelinPathway
ProstacyclinPathway
Endothelial cells
Proendothelin
Endothelial cells
Arachidonic acid
Smooth muscle cells
Prostacyclin (prostaglandin I2)
Smooth muscle cells
Approved Therapeutic Targets
Humbert M et al. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1425-1436.
Exogenousnitric oxide
sGC stimulator
Evolution From Exercise Capacity to Morbidity and Mortality Randomized Controlled Trials
*Estimated mean study drug exposure. †Estimated median study drug exposure. ‡Estimated target enrollment.PAH=pulmonary arterial hypertension; RCT=randomized controlled trial. Channick RN et al. Lancet. 2001;358:1119-1123. Rubin LJ et al. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:896-903. Galiè N et al. Lancet. 2008;371:2093-2100. Galiè N et al. Circulation. 2008;117:3010-3019. Galiè N et al. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2148-2157. Simonneau G et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165:800-804. McLaughlin VV et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174:1257-1263. Galiè N et al. Circulation. 2009;119:2894-2903. Simonneau G et al. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:521-530. Olschewski H et al.N Engl J Med. 2002;347:322-329. Pulido T et al. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:809-818. Sitbon O et al. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2522-33. Galiè N et al. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:834-44.McLaughlin VV et al. Eur Respir J. 2015;46:405–413
Weeks0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
N=32N=213
N=185N=202N=192N=277N=470N=67
N=405N=267
N=203AIRPACES
PHIRSTSTEP
Simonneau et al (2002)SUPER-1ARIES-2ARIES-1
EARLYBREATHE-1
Study 351
6MWD Trials
n=235TRIUMPHCHEST n=443
FREEDOM-EV n=858
N=742*N=1150*N=545‡†AMBITION
GRIPHONSERAPHIN
COMPASS-2
Morbidity and Mortality Trials
n=344
PDE-5 Inhibitor: Sildenafil, TadalafilSide Effects
• Nose bleed
• Headache
• Dyspepsia
• Flushing
• Diarrhea
• Visual changes
• Contraindicated with use of nitrates
sGC Stimulator : RiociguatSide Effects
• Headache
• Dizziness
• Dyspepsia/gastritis
• Nausea
• Diarrhea
• Hypotension
• Vomiting
• Anemia
• Gastroesophageal reflux
• Constipation
• Contraindicated in pregnancy, with use of nitrates or NO donors in any form, or with use of PDE inhibitors
1/14/2019
10
Mechanisms of Action of Approved Therapies for GROUP I PAH (not other groups)
Adapted from Humbert M et al. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1425‐1436.
cGMP
cAMP
Vasoconstriction and proliferation
Endothelinreceptor A
Endothelin-receptor
antagonists
Endothelinreceptor B
Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor
Vasodilationand antiproliferation
Phosphodiesterase type 5
Vasodilationand antiproliferation
Prostacyclin derivatives
Nitric Oxide
Endothelin-1
Pre-proendothelin
L-arginine
Prostaglandin I2
L-citrulline
Nitric OxidePathway
EndothelinPathway
ProstacyclinPathway
Endothelial cells
Proendothelin
Endothelial cells
Arachidonic acid
Smooth muscle cells
Prostacyclin (prostaglandin I2)
Smooth muscle cells
Exogenous nitric oxide sGC stimulator
*PHA Scientific Leadership Council recommends LFT testing at onset of all treatments for PAH and periodically thereafter, at prescriber’s discretion.
Endothelin Receptor Antagonists: (Bosentan, Ambrisentan, Macitentan) Side Effects:
• Nasal congestion
• Abnormal hepatic function*
– monthly LFTs required for bosentan
• Anemia
– monitor CBC quarterly
• Edema
– lower extremity edema may require diuretic adjustment
• Teratogenic
– Avoid pregnancy.
Weeks0 1921444824 72 96 168120
Hazard ratio, 0.50 (95% Cl, 0.35-0.72)p<0.001
0
60
100
80
40
20
Combination therapy
Pooled monotherapy
AMBITION: Effect of Ambrisentan Plus Tadalafil Versus Monotherapy on Clinical Worsening*
* Death, hospitalization for worsening PAH, disease progression, unsatisfactory long-term clinical response. Galiè N et al. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:834-44.
Pa
rtic
ipa
nts
wit
h N
o E
ven
t (
%)
No. at risk:Combination therapyPooled monotherapy
229
209
186
155
145
108
106
77
71
49
36
25
4
5
253
247
SERAPHIN: Effect of Macitentan on Disease Progression
* Worsening of PAH, initiation of treatment with IV or SC prostanoids, lung transplantation or atrial septostomyPulido T et al. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:809-818.
0
40
80
100
60
20
Months
Pa
tien
ts w
itho
ut
an
eve
nt
rela
ted
to P
AH
or
de
ath
fro
m
fro
m a
ny
cau
se*
(%)
0 6 12 363018 24
No. at risk:PlaceboMacitentan 3 mgMacitentan 10 mg
250250242
188213208
160188187
233241
648091
135166171
122147155
Macitentan 10 mg qdMacitentan 3 mg qdPlacebo
64% on background therapy:- 62% PDE5I- 5% Prostanoid
Approved Therapeutic Targets
Humbert M et al. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1425-1436.
cGMP
cAMP
Vasoconstriction and proliferation
Endothelinreceptor A
Endothelin-receptor
antagonists
Endothelinreceptor B
Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor
Vasodilationand antiproliferation
Phosphodiesterase type 5
Vasodilationand antiproliferation
Prostacyclin derivatives
Nitric Oxide
Endothelin-1
Pre-proendothelin
L-arginine
Prostaglandin I2
L-citrulline
Nitric OxidePathway
EndothelinPathway
ProstacyclinPathway
Endothelial cells
Proendothelin
Endothelial cells
Arachidonic acid
Smooth muscle cells
Prostacyclin (prostaglandin I2)
Smooth muscle cells
Exogenous nitric oxide sGC stimulator
Iloprost (Ventavis®)Treprostinil (Tyvaso®)
Prostacyclin Analogues: Intravenous, Subcutaneous, Inhaled, or Oral
WG
Treprostinil (Remodulin®)
Treprostinil (Orenitram®)Selexipag (Uptravi®)
Epoprostenol (Flolan®
or Veletri®)Treprostinil (Remodulin®)
Epoprostenol IV: FC III‐IV, 2 ng/kg/min titrated to desired clinical response in 1‐2 ng/kg/min increments.Treprostinil IV / SC: FC II‐IV, 1.25‐2.5 ng/kg/min/wk. IV=diluted. Inhaled: FC III, to 54 mcg, 4 inh/d. Oral: FC II‐III, starting at 0.25 mg bid and titrated in 0.25 mg increments as tolerated.Iloprost Inhaled: FC III‐IV, 2.5‐5 mcg, 6‐9 inh/d.
1/14/2019
11
Oral Prostacylin Therapy: Time to First Morbidity or Mortality Event—GRIPHON
Sitbon O et al. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2522‐33.
Selexipag vs placebo: RR 40%; HR=0.60; p<0.0001
No. at Risk
Placebo 582 433 347 220 149 88 28Selexipag 574 455 361 246 171 101 40
Patients without an event (%
)
00
20
40
80
60
12 18 24 30 366Months
Placebo
Selexipag
80% on background therapy:
‐ SIDE EFFECTS STILL
Prostanoid Side Effects
Flushing
Headache
Diarrhea, nausea, vomiting
Jaw pain
Leg pain
Hypotension
Dizziness
Syncope
Rebound PH if interruption of infusion delivery
Delivery site complications (pain, infection, cough, thrombosis,)
Vary according to drug and route of delivery (Po, Inhaled, SQ, IV)
PH Case DS Treated with Sildenafil alone with improvement; Escalated dose
to 80 mg TID
Walk Test 660 m, no desat
WHO functional Class I most days.
BNP 12
Echo:Severe RV enlargement; Low normal TAPSE. Right Heart Cath 11/08 on Revatio 80 TID. RA 7, PA 91/33 mean 55, PWP 8, CO5.4 CI 2.7 PVR
8.6, MVO2 sat 71, AVO2 diff 5.0 New Medication to discuss? Macitentan added to Sildenafil in 2016. Doing Great 12 years later - 2019.
Case TN (3) Returned : Primary Care MD
Sildenafil TID monotherapy for PAH in 2014.
Erratic FU but compensated initially on therapy and better exercise tolerance. ETOH use.
Returned one year later 2015: Increased edema, DOE, consistent with early RV failure.
Unable to get in for repeat Right Heart Catheterization.
Diuretics added to Sildenafil.
Echo shows worsening RV size and Worsening function. Estimated PASPIs > 60 mmHg. Estimated RA pressure is higher
Candidate for additional combinationTherapy? Compliance, Cost? ‐Oral Selexipag added 2016
‐NOT candidate for infusion therapy: Social Barriers
‐ Palliative care: 2018.
Summary PH should be in the differential diagnoses for the dyspneic patient.
Usual diagnostic studies can determine who has a higher likelihood of PH and help to determine the possible cause and Group.
Therapy follows according to the Group.
Group I PAH‐specific therapies promote vasodilation and remodeling, leading to improved RV function and exercise.
Selection of initial therapy largely depends upon severity of disease at diagnosis low‐risk patients can be treated with oral agents Initial or early combination therapy of benefit high‐risk patients require parenteral prostacyclins
Summary—Cont’dLongitudinal assessment of PAH patients includes monitoring of:clinical parameters functional parametershemodynamic parameters laboratory parameters imaging parameters
Current strategy is to achieve “Low Risk” Status in all patients. Directed combination therapy and potent therapies should be used in a timely fashion to achieve this status.
1/14/2019
12
Mary Furbee: Spiral. (Used with permission)
Pulmonary Hypertension
Correct Diagnosis, Best Plan, Partner before you jump in……
PH Patient Chronic Care Needs: Heart Failure Overlap (Group II), Chronic Lung Disease Overlap (Group III),
Specialty PH Care (Groups I, IV, V)
MCW‐FMLH: Among first 26 PHA CC Centers in USA
Froedtert –MCW PHA CCC