49
PURPOSE OF THIS MEETING
…is to Discuss the Need and Present the Proposed Alternatives to Improve US-62 From SH-9 to
Anadarko in Caddo County
Project Beginning
Project End
N
Caddo County, Oklahoma
City of
Anadarko
PURPOSE OF THE PROJECT…is to Correct the Deficient Curves on US-62 and Improve
the Safety of the Roadway
Anadarko, OK
NS
2620
Rd.
N
NS
2610
Rd.
NS
2630
R
d.
East ProjectWest Project
Apache “Y”
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
Initial Alternative Screening
Develop Preliminary Alternatives
InitialData
Collection
Identify Problem
Tribal Meeting
TODAY
Public Meeting
PROJECT HISTORY Prior Study by ODOT
o Three Alternatives Studied• Improvements to Existing• North Alignment• South Alignment
o Public Meeting HeldFebruary 28, 2012
o North Alternative Selectedo Field Survey – Found Isolated
Grave Siteo Additional Alternatives
Considered
IdentifyProblem
Initial DataCollection
PreliminaryAlternatives
AlternativeScreening
CORRIDOR WIDE IMPROVEMENTS SH-9 From Fort Cobb to US-62 (Apache “Y”)
Initial DataCollection
PreliminaryOptions
OptionScreening
N 2
570
Rd.
N 2
610
Rd.
FortCobb
E 1340 Rd
N 2
580
Rd.
Apache “Y”
E 1350 Rd
E 1330 RdWashita River
N
River
PROJECT AREA INFORMATION General Data
o 2-Lane Roadway With 3-Foot Shoulderso Speed Limit – Posted 65 mpho 1 Bridge Structure (Hog Creek)o Existing (2015) Traffic: 3,780 Vehicles / Dayo Projected Traffic (2036): 5,270 Vehicles / Day (10% Trucks)
Structure (Hog Creek)
IdentifyProblem
Initial DataCollection
PreliminaryAlternatives
AlternativeScreening
PROJECT AREA INFORMATION General Data
o 2-Lane Roadway With 3-Foot Shoulderso Speed Limit – Posted 65 mpho 1 Bridge Structure (Hog Creek)o Existing (2015) Traffic: 3,780 Vehicles / Dayo Projected Traffic (2036): 5,270 Vehicles / Day (10% Trucks)
Structure (Hog Creek)
N
NS
2620
Rd.
IdentifyProblem
Initial DataCollection
PreliminaryAlternatives
AlternativeScreening
PROJECT AREA INFORMATION General Data
o 2-Lane Roadway With 3-Foot Shoulderso Speed Limit – Posted 65 mpho 1 Bridge Structure (Hog Creek)o Existing (2016) Traffic: 3,780 Vehicles / Dayo Projected Traffic (2036): 5,270 Vehicles / Day
(10% Trucks) Collision Data
o Total: 90 Documented Accidents (2009-2015) • 48 Personal Property Damage• 38 Injury• 4 Fatal
IdentifyProblem
Initial DataCollection
PreliminaryAlternatives
AlternativeScreening
o More Than Twice the State Average for Collisions (expressed in crashes per million vehicle miles)
• US-62: 155.4 (65.6 injury, 6.9 fatality)• Statewide for Non Interstates: 63.82 (30.56 injury, 2.60 fatality)
COLLISION DATA
EXISTING CONDITIONSEXISTING CONDITIONSWARRANT IMPROVEMENT
Roadway Deficiencieso Narrow Shoulderso Roadway Geometry
• Horizontal Curves – 11 Total, 6 Deficient (Curvature and Superelevation)
• Vertical Curves – 35 Total, 12 Deficient
o Limited Sight Distance
IdentifyProblem
Initial DataCollection
PreliminaryAlternatives
AlternativeScreening
EXISTING CONDITIONSEXISTING CONDITIONSWARRANT IMPROVEMENT
Anadarko, OK
NS
2620
Rd.
N
NS
2610
Rd.
NS
2630
R
d.
East ProjectWest Project
Apache “Y”
Roadway Deficiencieso Narrow Shoulderso Roadway Geometry
• Horizontal Curves – 11 Total, 6 Deficient (Curvature and Superelevation)
• Vertical Curves – 35 Total, 12 Deficient
o Limited Sight Distance
EXISTING CONDITIONSEXISTING CONDITIONSWARRANT IMPROVEMENT
Roadway Deficiencieso Narrow Shoulderso Roadway Geometry
• Horizontal Curves – 11 Total, 6 Deficient (Curvature and Superelevation)
• Vertical Curves – 35 Total, 12 Deficient
o Limited Sight Distance
IdentifyProblem
Initial DataCollection
PreliminaryAlternatives
AlternativeScreening
East Project
West Project
NS
2620
Rd.
NS
2610
Rd.
PROJECT CONSTRAINTS
IdentifyProblem
Initial DataCollection
Identified Project Constraintso Topographyo Homes & Businesses
• Driveways• Local Access
o Utilitieso Tribal Properties & Cultural Siteso Environmental Resources
PreliminaryAlternatives
AlternativeScreening
PROJECT CONSTRAINTS
IdentifyProblem
Initial DataCollection
Identified Project Constraintso Topographyo Homes & Businesses
• Driveways• Local Access
o Utilitieso Tribal Properties & Cultural Siteso Environmental Resources
PreliminaryAlternatives
AlternativeScreening
PROJECT CONSTRAINTS
IdentifyProblem
Initial DataCollection
Identified Project Constraintso Topographyo Homes & Businesses
• Driveways• Local Access
o Utilitieso Tribal Properties & Cultural Siteso Environmental Resources
PreliminaryAlternatives
AlternativeScreening
PROJECT CONSTRAINTS Data Collection Area
o Encompassed all Alternativeso Database Research and Field Reconnaissance
Anadarko, OK
NS-
2620
Rd.
N
NS-
2610
Rd.
NS-
2630
R
d.
Apache “Y”
East ProjectWest Project
PROJECT CONSTRAINTS Tribal Properties (West Project)
o Trust Lands (Hatched)o According to Information From the Counties and BIAo Primarily in the West Projecto Primarily in the West Project
N
Apache “Y”
NS-
2620
Rd.
NS-
2610
Rd.
West Project
PROJECT CONSTRAINTS Tribal Church and Cemetery
o Ware’s Chapelo Ware’s Cemeteryo Grave Site (Helen James
Died 1912?)
Ware’s Cemetery
Ware’s Chapel
Grave Site
NS-
2620
Rd.
PROJECT CONSTRAINTS Tribal Church and Cemetery
o Ware’s Chapelo Ware’s Cemeteryo Grave Site (Helen James
Died 1912?)
Ware’s Cemetery
Ware’s Chapel
Grave Site
NS-
2620
Rd.
PROJECT CONSTRAINTS Wetlands and Streams
o Streams – Hog Creek & Tributaries, Washita River
o Wetlands – Associated With Washita River
o Large Floodplain
Anadarko, OK
N
NS-
2620
Rd.
NS-
2610
Rd.
NS-
2630
Rd.
Apache “Y”
East ProjectWest Project
PROJECT CONSTRAINTS Cultural Resources
o OK Indian Missionary Conference Center and Campground (Potential Historic Buildings)
o One Known Archaeological Site
Anadarko, OK
N Campground
NS-
2620
Rd.
NS-
2610
Rd.
NS-
2630
Rd.
Apache “Y”
East ProjectWest Project
DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATIVES Proposed Design Criteria
o Roadway Section• Two 12-Foot Lanes• 8-Foot Shoulders
o Design Speeds – 65 mpho Clear Zone – 28 Feeto Maximum Superelevation of 8%
IdentifyProblem
Initial DataCollection
PreliminaryAlternatives
AlternativeScreening
DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATIVES
8%of 8%
PreliminaryAlternatives
AlternativeScreening
8%
ALTERNATIVESALTERNATIVES OVERVIEW Overview
o West Project – Alternatives 1, 2 and 3• Different Alignments Cross Country• Hog Creek Bridge• County Road Intersections With Heavier Movement
o East Project – Alternatives A, B and C• Different Offsets – North• Far East End – All Centered on Existing • Horizontal Curve Corrections
o Combinations
Anadarko, OK
NS
2620
Rd.N
NS
2610
Rd.
NS
2630
R
d.
East ProjectWest Project
Alternative 3
Apache “Y”
ALTERNATIVESALTERNATIVES -- WEST PROJECT Overview
o West Project – Alternatives 1, 2, and 3• Different Alignments Cross Country• Hog Creek Bridge• County Road Intersections With Heavier Movement• South Alternative – Floodplain, NRCS Dam, & Reservoir
NS
2620
Rd.
N
NS
2610
Rd.
Alternative 3
Apache “Y”
ALTERNATIVE 1 Overview
o Aligns With Improvements at Apache Yo Closest to Existing Alignment o Key Features
• Offset 50 feet South• Three Curves Greater Than 6% Superelevation• Left Turn Lanes at NS 2610 Rd. & NS 2620 Rd.
NS
2620
Rd.
NN
S 26
10 R
d.
Apache “Y”
ALTERNATIVE 1 Overview
o Aligns With Improvements at Apache Yo Closest to Existing Alignment o Key Features
• Offset 50 Feet South• Three Curves Greater Than 6% Superelevation• Left Turn Lanes at NS 2610 Rd. & NS 2620 Rd.• Steep Grade West of NS 2620 Rd., 5%
NS
2620
Rd.
NS
2610
Rd.
East Project
West Project
NS
2620
Rd.
Cem
eter
y
- NS
2620
Rd.
-5.00%
ALTERNATIVE 1 Overview
o Aligns With Improvements at Apache Yo Closest to Existing Alignmento Key Features
• Offset 50 Feet South• Three Curves Greater Than 6% Superelevation• Steep Grade West of NS 2620 Rd. • Left Turn Lanes at NS 2610 Rd. & NS 2620 Rd.• Steep Grade West of NS 2620 Rd., 5%
o Bridge Over Hog Creek Offset to South – 50 Feet
NS
2620
Rd.
NN
S 26
10 R
d.
NS
2620
Rd.
Apache “Y”
ALTERNATIVE ALTERNATIVE 2 Overview
o Aligns With Improvements at Apache Yo Key Features
• Offset 35 Feet North• Two Curves Greater Than 6% Superelevation• Climbing Lane • Left Turn Lanes at NS 2610 Rd. & NS 2620 Rd.
NS
2620
Rd.
NN
S 26
10 R
d.
Apache “Y”
ALTERNATIVE ALTERNATIVE 2 Overview
o Aligns With Improvements at Apache Yo Key Features
• Offset 35 Feet North• Two Curves Greater Than 6% Superelevation• Climbing Lane • Left Turn Lanes at NS 2610 Rd. & NS 2620 Rd.• Improve Grades West of NS 2620 Rd., < 4%
East Project
West Project
NS
2620
Rd.
NS
2610
Rd.
NS
2620
Rd.
< < -- 4%
ALTERNATIVE ALTERNATIVE 2 Overview
o Aligns With Improvements at Apache Yo Key Features
• Offset 35 Feet North• Two Curves Greater Than 6% Superelevation• Climbing Lane • Left Turn Lanes at NS 2610 Rd. & NS 2620 Rd.• Improve Grades West of NS 2620 Rd., < 4%
o Bridge Over Hog Creek Offset to South – 50 Feeto Portion of Existing Highway to Remain
NS
2620
Rd.
NN
S 26
10 R
d.
NS
2620
Rd.
Apache “Y”
ALTERNATIVE ALTERNATIVE 3 Overview
o Aligns With Improvements at Apache Yo Key Features
• Offset 50 Feet South• One Curve Greater Than 6% Superelevation• Climbing Lane • Left Turn Lanes at NS 2610 Rd. & NS 2620 Rd.
NS
2620
Rd.
NN
S 26
10 R
d.
Apache “Y”
Climbing Lane
ALTERNATIVE ALTERNATIVE 3 Overview
o Aligns With Improvements at Apache Yo Key Features
• Offset 60 Feet South• One Curve Greater Than 6% Superelevation• Climbing Lane • Left Turn Lanes at NS 2610 Rd. & NS 2620 Rd. • Improve Grades West of NS 2620 Rd., 4%
East Project
West ProjectN
S 26
20 R
d.
NS
2610
Rd.
NS
2620
Rd.
--4.00%
ALTERNATIVE ALTERNATIVE 3 Overview
o Aligns With Improvements at Apache Yo Key Features
• Offset 60 Feet South• One Curve Greater Than 6% Superelevation• Climbing Lane • Left Turn Lanes at NS 2610 Rd. & NS 2620 Rd.• Improve Grades West of NS 2620 Rd., 4%
o Bridge Over Hog Creek – Near Washita Rivero Portion of Existing Highway to Remain
NS
2620
Rd.
NN
S 26
10 R
d.
Apache “Y”
Climbing Lane
Anadarko, OK
Washita River
N
NS
2630
R
d.
ALTERNATIVESALTERNATIVES ––– EAST PROJECT East Project – Alternatives A, B and C
o Different Offsets – Northo Far East End – All Centered on Existingo Horizontal Curve Improvements (5 Curves)
ALTERNATIVESALTERNATIVES ––– EAST PROJECT Offset Roadways
o Alternative A – 0 feet, Centered on Existing• Temporary Widening (22 ft), South Side at Horizontal Curves• Overlay Existing Pavement With New Shoulders, One Lane Flagging Needed
o Alternative B – 13 feet North• Temporary Widening (8 ft), South Side • Overlay Existing Pavement With New Pavement on North Side (20 ft)
o Alternative C – 50 feet North• No Temporary Widening Needed• New Pavement with Old Pavement Removed
o Far East End - Overlay Existing Pavement With New Shoulderso South Offset Considered – Eliminated due to Number of Structures Impacted
N
50 ft
13 ft
COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES Compare the Impacts of the Various Options
o Overlay Each Option and Tabulate Impactso Develop a Relative Means of Comparison
Anadarko, OK
N
NS-
2620
Rd.
NS-
2610
Rd.
NS-
2630
R
d.
Apache “Y”
East ProjectWest Project
Alternative 3
COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES All Alternatives Will Avoid the Cemetery, Ware’s Chapel, and the
Grave Site If There are Other Culturally Important Sites That we Should Avoid,
Please Let us Know
Anadarko, OK
N
NS-
2620
Rd.
NS-
2610
Rd.
NS-
2630
R
d.
Apache “Y”
East ProjectWest Project
Alternative 3
COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES Evaluation Criteria
o Roadway Geometrics, Intersections, and Safetyo Impacts to Tribal & Private Propertyo Impacts to Homes & Businesseso Impacts to Environmental Resourceso Constructability and Maintenance of Traffic During Constructiono Cost – Construction, Right-of-Way, Utilitieso Tribal and Public Input
Anadarko, OK
N
NS-
2620
Rd.
NS-
2610
Rd.
NS-
2630
R
d.
Apache “Y”
East ProjectWest Project
Alternative 3
GEOMETRICS AND SAFETY
IdentifyProblem
Initial DataCollection
PreliminaryAlternatives
AlternativeScreening
West Projecto Improvements to Grades and Sight Distance Under Alternative 1 are
Limited Due to Adjacent Properties and Cemeteryo Alternative 2 Improves Curves but Intersection at NS-2620 is Not Idealo Alternative 3 Has the Most Desirable Grades, Intersections, and Sight
Distanceo Alternatives 2 and 3 Will Require a Climbing Lane Due to the Length of
Grade
NS-
2620
Rd.
NS-
2610
Rd.
Apache “Y”
Alternative 3
GEOMETRICS AND SAFETY
IdentifyProblem
Initial DataCollection
PreliminaryAlternatives
AlternativeScreening
East Projecto All of the Alternatives Will Correct the Horizontal Curveso All of the East Project Alternatives are Similar in Terms of Safety
NS-
2630
R
d.
Anadarko, OK
Washita River
IMPACTS IMPACTS –– WEST PROJECT
IdentifyProblem
Initial DataCollection
PreliminaryAlternatives
AlternativeScreening
West Projecto Alternative 1 Has the Most Impacts to Homes and Businesseso One Business (Fruit Stand) Will be Affected by All Alternativeso Alternative 3 Requires the Most Property and Affects Wetlands
Alternative Total Cost Right-of-Way (Acres)
Number of Relocations
Tribal Property
(acre)
Wetlands (acre)
Cultural Resources
Traffic-Dependent Businesses
Maintenance of Traffic (Lanes Closed)
2
13
63
75 21.7 1.7 00
0
0
15.5
20.2
1(relocation)
1
1$15.7 M
JP No. 27076(04) US-62 West of Anadarko, Caddo CountyWest Project Matrix
041 34
1$15.8 M
$13.5 M
0
0
0
IMPACTS IMPACTS –– EAST PROJECT
IdentifyProblem
Initial DataCollection
PreliminaryAlternatives
AlternativeScreening
East Projecto Alternative C Requires the Most Propertyo Alternative A Would Require One-Lane Traffic for a Longer Periodo Other Impacts are Similar for the East Project Alternatives
Alternative Total Cost Right-of-Way (Acres)
Number of Relocations
Tribal Property
(acre)
Wetlands (acre)
Cultural Resources
Traffic-Dependent Businesses
Maintenance of Traffic (Lanes Closed)
1C
$10.1 M
$10.1 M
0.10
29 0A
1
$10.4 M 0.10 033 1 0
B 29
0.10 0
00
0
0
1 10
0
JP No. 27076(04) US-62 West of Anadarko, Caddo CountyEast Project Matrix
NEXT PROJECT STEPS
PublicInput
TODAY
Comment Period
May 19, 2016
Select Preferred
Alternative
Construction2023
Right-of-Way 2018
Prepare Environmental
Document
THANK YOU!Please Submit Your Comments by
May 19, 2016 Leave Your Comment Form Here Today Mail the Comment Form Back to ODOT:
Environmental Programs Division200 NE 21st StreetOklahoma City, OK 73105
Email Your Comments to [email protected]
QUESTIONS?
