236digilib.uinsby.ac.id/15748/10/Daftar Pustaka.pdf · Pembelajaran Matematika SMP Kelas Vii Materi...

digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id

236

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Aiken, L.R. (1994). Psychological Testing and Assessment,(Eight Edition),

Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Akamca, G.O., Ellez, A.M., Hamurcu, H. 2009. Effects Of Computer Aided

Concept Cartoons On Learning Outcomes. Procedia Social and Behavioral

Sciences 1 (2009) 296–301.

Aknipar, E., Yildiz, E., Tatar, N., & Ergin, O. 2009. Students' attitude toward

science and technology: An investigation of gender, grade level and

academic achievement. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 2804-

2808.

Alake, E.M And Ogunseemi, O.E. (2013). Effects of Scaffolding Strategy on

Learners’ Academic Achievement in Integrated Science At The Junior

Secondary School Level. European Scientific Journal Vol.9, No.19.

Alake, E.M. (2007). Effect of concept mapping on students’ performance in the

teaching of controlling the environment. Science Teachers Association of

Nigeria, Integrated Science Education Series 5. p 10-14.

Alber, R. (2014). Scaffolding Strategies to Use With Your Students. USA: George

Lucas Educational Foundation.

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1989). Science

for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.

Anderson, L.W., dan Krathwohl, D.R. (2001). A Taxonomy for

Learning,Teaching, and Assesing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of

Educatioanl Objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Arends, R.I. (2009). Learning to Teach 5th Edition. USA: The McGraw-Hill

Companies, Inc

Arikunto. S. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, Ed Revisi VI,

Penerbit PT Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Atsnan, M.F., dan Rahmita, T.G. 2013. Penerapan pendekatan Scientific dalam

Pembelajaran Matematika SMP Kelas Vii Materi Bilangan (Pecahan).

Yogyakarta: UNY.


237

Azevedo, R. & Hadwin, A. F. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and

metacognition-implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds.

Instructional Science 33, 367–379.

Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., Winters, F. I., & Cromley, J. G. 2008.

Why is externallyfacilitated regulated learning more effective than self-

regulated learning with hypermedia? Educational Technology Research

and Development, 56(1), 45–72

Azwar, S. (2014). Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Baharom S, Hamid R, Hamzah N. (2012). Development of a Problem Based

Learning in Concrete Technology Laboratory Work. Procedia - Social and

Behavioral Sciences 60 p. 8-13.

Bannert, M., Hildebrand, M., & Mengelkamp, C. (2009). Effects of a

metacognitive support device in learning environments. Computers in

Human Behavior, 25(4), p. 829–835.

Barrow, L.H. 2010. Encouraging Creativity with Scientific Inquiry. Creative

Education 1, p. 1-6.

Basu, S., Biswas, G., Sengupta, P. (2012). Scaffolding to support learning of

ecology in simulation environments. USA: Vanderbilt University

Bati, K., Erturk, G., & Kaptan, F. (2009). The awareness level of pre-school

education teachers regarding science process skill. Procedia Social and

Behavioral Sciences 2.

Bell, F. H. (1978). Teaching and Learning Mathematic in Secondary School.

Iowa: Win C. Brown Company.

Bell, P., & Davis, E..A. 2000. Designing Mildred: Scaffolding Students'

Reflection and Argumentation Using a Cognitive Software Guide. In B.

Fishman & S. O'Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.), (pp. 142-149). Mahwah, NJ:

Erlbaum.

Beydoğan, H. Ö. 2001. Öğretimi Planlama ve Değerlendirme. Eser Ofset,

Erzurum. Committee on Undergraduate Science Education (1997). Science

Teaching Reconsidered: A Handbook. National Academy Press,

Washington. (This report is available on-line at

http://www.nap.edu/readingroom/books.

Brill, G and Anat Y. 2003. Learning Biology Through Research Papers: A

Stimulus for Question-Asking by High-School Students. Cell Biology

Education Vol. 2, 266–274

http://www.nap.edu/readingroom/books


238

Bruner, J. 2001. Conatructivist Theory. http://www. TIP. Htm. Diakses

tanggal 23 November 2013.

Bryan, J. (2006). Technology for physics instruction. Contemporary Issues in

Technology and Teacher Education, 6(2), p. 230-245.

Budiningsih, C. A. (2005). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Carey, S. (2000). Science Education as Conceptual Change. Journal of Applied

Developmental Psy cology, 21 (1): 13-19.

Çepni, S., Ayase, A., Johnson, D., Turgut, M.F. (1996). Teaching Physics.

Ankara: National Education Development Project Pre-Service Teacher

Training Trial Edition.

Chin, C. (2001). Learning in Science: What Do Students’ Questions Tell Us

About Their Thinking? Education Journal Vol. 29, No. 2.

Chin, C. (2002). Student-Generated Questions: Encouraging Inquisitive Minds in

Learning Science. Teaching and Learning, Vol. 23, No. 1 p. 5947.

Chin, C., & Brown, D. E. 2000. Learning in science: A comparison of deep and

surface approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 109–

138.

Choi, I., Land, S. M., & Turgeon, A. J. (2005). Scaffolding peer-questioning

strategies to facilitate metacognition during online small group discussion.

Instructional Science 33, p. 483–511.

Cobb, P. (1994). Where is The Mind Constructivist an Sociocultural Perpective on

Mathematical Development. Educational Research 23 (7) p. 1320.

Costa, J., Caldeira, H., Gallástegui, J. R., and Otero, J. (2000). An analysis of

question asking on scientific texts explaining natural phenomena. Journal

of Research in Science Teaching Volume 37, Issue 6, pages 602–614.

Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among

Five Approaches, 2nd ed. California : Sage Publication.

Crocker, L. & Algina, J. (2008). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test,

Theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc

Dabell, J. (2004). The Maths Coordinator’s File- Using Concept Cartoons.

London: PFP Publishing.

Dahar, R.W. (2011). Teori-teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Erlangga

http://www/


239

Delismar, Ashyar R, dan Hariyadi B. (2013). Peningkatan Kreativitas dan

Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa melalui Penerapan Model Group

Investigation. Edu-Sains Volume 1 No 2 tahun 2013

Depdikbud. 2013. Pendekatan Saintifik. http://pengawas madrasah files

wordpress.com /2013/11/10 pendekatan saintifik.pdf

Dewi, dkk. (2014). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Circuit Learning Berbantuan

Media Audiovisual Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ips Siswa Sd Negeri 1 Pejeng

Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014Jurnal Mimbar PGSD Universitas Pendidikan

Ganesha Jurusan PGSD (Vol: 2 No: 1 Tahun 2014).

Dimopoulos, K., Koulaidis, V., Sklaveniti, S. (2003). Towards an analysis of

visual images in school science textbooks and press articles about science

and technology. Research in Science Education 33 p.189–216,

Dogru, M. 2008. The Application of Problem Solving Method on Science

Teacher Trainees on the Solution of the Environmental Problems. Journal

of Environmental & Science Education, 2008, 3 (1), 9 – 18

Dori, Y. J., & Herscovitz, O. (1999). Question-posing capability as an alternative.

Education, 19(7), p. 781–799.

Dresner, M., de rivera, C., Fuccillo, K.K., and Chang, C. (2013). Improving

Higher-Order Thinking And Knowledge Retention In Environmental

Science Teaching. BioScience Advance Access publisher

Duncan, G., & Met, M. (2010). STARTALK: From paper to practice. College

Park, MD: National Foreign Language Center at the University of

Maryland.

Eggen, P and Kauchak, D. (2001). Educational Psychology: Classroom

Connections. 5th ed. New York: Macmillan.

El Imane, N.B. (2013). Conceptualizing Essay Tests` Reliability and Validity:

From Research to Theory. Cina: Huazhong Normal University

Ertmer, P. A., & Cennamo, K. C. (1995). Teaching instructional design: An

apprenticeship approach. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 8(4) p. 45-

58

Etemadzadeh, A., Seifi, S., and Far, H.R. (2013). The role of questioning

technique in developing thinking skills: The ongoing effect on writing

skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 70 p. 1024 – 1031


240

Fadel, C. 2008. Multimodal Learning Through Media: What the Research Says.

Metiri group. Global Lead, Education; Cisco Systems, Inc

Fraenkel, R.J, & Wallen, N.C. (2006). How to Design and Evaluate Research in

Education. London: Mc. Graw Hill, inc

Fretz, E.B., Hsin, K.W., BaoHui, Z., Elizabeth, A.D., Joseph, S.K. (2002). An

investigation of software scaffolds supporting modeling practices.

Research in Science Education 32 p.567–589.

Gaskins, I.Q., Rauch, S., Gensemer, E., Councilli, E., O’Hara, C., Six, L., and

Scott. (1997). Scaffolding the development of intelligence among children

who are delayed in learning to read in K. Hogan and M. Pressly (Eds),

scaffolding students learning. Instructional Aproaches and Issues p.43-73

Gbodi, B.E., and Laleye, A.M. (2006). Effect of videotaped instruction on

learning of integrated science. Journal of Research in Curriculum and

Teaching 1(1) p. 10-19.

Gilbert, J.K. (2010). The role of visual representations in the learning and

teaching of science. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and

Teaching, Volume 11, Issue 1

Gooding, D., Pinch, T., and Schaffer, S. (1989). The Uses Of Experiment: Studies

In The Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Graham, S., & Weiner, B. (1996). Theory and principles of motivation. In D. C.

Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp.

63-84). New York: Macmillan.

Gronlund, N. E. (2003). Assessment of student achievement (7th ed.). Boston:

Allyn & Bacon.

Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open-ended learning environments:

foundations, methods, and models. Instructional design theories and

models: Volume II p. 115–140).

Harlen, W. (2013). Effective Teaching of Science. A Review of Research.

Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education

Hayat, B. dan Yusuf, S. 2010. Bechmark International Mutu Pendidikan. Jakarta:

Bumi Aksara.

Hess, K. 2008. Developing and using learning progressions as a schema for

measuring progress. Paper presented at 2008 CCSSO Student Assessment


241

Conference, Orlando, FL. Retrieved from

http://www.nciea.org/publications/CCSSO2_KH08.pdf

Hess, K. 2013. Science Teacher Toolkit Grades K-8.

http://www.exemplars.com/resources/alignments

Hinduan, A.A. (2003). “Meningkatkan Kualitas SDM Melalui Pendidikan

IPA”.Makalah pada Seminar Himpunan Sarjana Pendidikan IPA Indonesia,

di Jurusan Pendidikan Fisika FMIPA UPI Bandung tanggal 1-2 Agustus

2003.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and

achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to

Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42, 99–

107.

Hofstein, A. (2012). Teachers’ Professional Development for Inquiry-Based

Learning.. Tbilisi: Ilia State University Georgia.

Hofstein, A. and Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2007). “The Laboratory in Science

Education: The State of The Art”. Chemistry Education Reserach and

Practice. 8, (2), 105-107.

Hogan, K., & Pressley, M. (1997). Scaffolding Student Learning: Instructional

Approaches And Issues. Cambrid: Brookline.

Hohenberg, P. 2010. What is Science? New York: New York University

Holbert, KE and George GK. 2008. Removing an Unsupported Statement in

Engineering Education LiteratureArizona: Arizona State University

Holbrook, J., & Kolodner, J.L. (2000). Scaffolding the Development of an

InquiryBased (Science) Classroom. In B. Fishman & S. O'Connor-

Divelbiss.

Howe, A. (2006). Development of Science Concept within Vygotskian

Framework. Science Education. Singapore: John Willey and Son.

http://www.21st Centuryskill.org. [19 September 2008].

Hussain Z, Sekuler A B, Bennett PJ. (2011). Superior Identification Of Familiar

Visual Patterns A Year After Learning. Psychol. Sci. 22, 2273– 2284.

Jager, T. (2012). Using Visual Media to Enhance Science Teaching and Learning

in Historically Disadvantaged Secondary Schools. South Africa: Tshwane

University of Technology.

http://www.nciea.org/publications/CCSSO2_KH08.pdf

http://www.exemplars.com/resources/alignments


242

Jena AK. (2012). Does Constructivist Approach Applicable Through Concept

Maps To Achieve Meaningful Learning in Science? Asia-Pacific Forum on

Science

Jirout, J., & Klahr, D. (2011). Children’s Question Asking And Curiosity: A

Training Study. SREE Fall 2011 Conference Abstract Template.

Joyce, B. R., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2000). Models of teaching (6th ed.).

Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Kahle, J.B and Damnjanovic, A. (1994). The Effect of Inquiry Activities on

Elementary Students' Enjoyment, Ease, and Confidence in Doing Science:

An Analysis by Sex and Race. Journal of Women and Minorities in

Science and Engineering, vol 1 no 1 p. 17-28

Kane, E.M. (2013). Urban Student Motivation through Inquiry-Based Learning.

Journal of Studies in Education. Vol. 3, No. 1

Karar, E. E. & Yenice, N. (2012). The investigation of scientific process skill

level of elementary education 8th grade students in view of demographic

features. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3885–3889.

Kartikasari, R. (2011). Penerapan Pendekatan Kontekstual (Contextual Teaching

And Learning) dengan Metode Eksperimen Untuk Meningkatkan

Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 14 Surakarta

Tahun Pelajaran 2010/2011 (Skripsi tidak diterbitkan). Fakultas Keguruan

dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta.

Keeling, E.L., Kelly, M.P., and Ella, L.I. (2009). A statistical analysis of student

questions in a cell biology laboratory. CBE-Life Sciences Education

Kitot, A.K.A., Ahmad, A.R., Seman, A.A. 2010. The Effectiveness of Inquiry

Teaching in Enhancing Students’Critical Thinking. Procedia Social and

Behavioral Sciences 7(C) (2010) 264–273

Klosterman, M. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2010). Multi-level assessment of scientific

content knowledge gains associated with socioscientific issues based

instruction. International Journal of Science Education 32, p.1017-1043.

Knutson, K., Smith. J., Nichols, P., Wallert. M.A., and Provost, J.J. (2010).

Bringing the excitement and motivation of research to students; Using

inquiry and research-based learning in a year-long biochemistry

laboratory. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 38(5) p.324-9.

Kuhn, D and Pease, M. 2015. What Needs to Develop in the Development of

Inquiry Skills? Cognition and Instruction, in press

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Knutson%20K%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21567852

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Smith%20J%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21567852

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Nichols%20P%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21567852

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Wallert%20MA%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21567852

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Provost%20JJ%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21567852

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21567852


243

Kuhn, D., Garcia-Mila, M., Zohar, A., & Andersen, C. (2000). Strategies of

knowledge acquisition.

Kurniasih, A.W. (2012). Scaffolding sebagai Alternatif Upaya Meningkatkan

Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematika Jurnal Kreano, Volume 3 No. 2

Lajoie, S.P. (2005). Extending the scaffolding metaphor. Instructional Science 33

p. 541-557

Lakkala, M., Muukkonen, H., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). Patterns of Scaffolding

In Computermediated Collaborative Inquiry. Mentoring and Tutoring:

Partnerships in Learning, 13(2). p.281–300.

Lati, W., Supasorn, S., and Promarak, V. 2012. Enhancement of learning

achievement and integrated science process skills using science inquiry

learning activities of chemical reaction rates. Procedia - Social and

Behavioral Sciences 46 ( 2012 ) 4471 – 4475

Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral

participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

LeDoux, J. E. (1999). Psychoanalytic theory: clues from the nrain. Neuro-

Psychoanalysis, 1 p. 44–49

Lee, C. D. (2001). Is October Brown Chinese? A cultural modeling activity

system for underachieving students. American Educational Research

Journal, 38, 97–141

Lee, C.S. and Kolodner, J.L. (2011). Scaffolding Students’ Development of

Creative Design Skills: A Curriculum Reference Model. Educational

Technology & Society, 14 (1), 3–15.

Lee, T. 2001. Scaffolding To Develop Problem-Solving And Self-Help Skills In

Young Children. Illionis: Texas Child Care.

Leinhardt, G., & Schwarz, B. B. (1997). Seeing the problem: An explanation from

Polya. Cognition and Instruction 15 p.395–434.

Li, D. D., & Lim, C. P. 2008. Scaffolding online historical inquiry tasks: A case

study of two secondary school classrooms. Computers & Education, 50(4),

1394-1410.

Lin, X., & Lehman, J. D. 1999. Supporting Learning Of Variable Control In A

Computer-Based Biology Environment: Effects of prompting college


244

students to reflect on their own thinking. Journal of Research in Science

Teaching, 36(7), 837–858.

Lipscomb, L., Swanson, J., West, A. (2004). Scaffolding. In M. Orey (Ed.),

Emergin perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved

May 25, 2012, from http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/.

Lu, C.C., Hong, C.J., Tseng Y.C. (2007). The Effectiveness of Inquiry-Based

Learning by Scaffolding Students to Ask “5 Why” questions. Taipei:

Department of Natural Science Education, National Taipei University of

Education.

Lynch, R. L., Padilla, M. J., Harnish, D., & DiStephano, C. 2001. A Model Of

Excellence For Contextual Teaching And Learning In Preservice Teacher

Education: Final and summative report.(Contract # ED-98-CO-0085,

1998-2001):.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved

from http://www.coe.uga.edu/ctl/ research/toc.pdf

Ma, Yue. 2003. Dual Coding Theory, Cognitive Load Theory and Their

Applications in Computer Based Multimedia Design. Northern Illionis

University. http://cedu.niu/.../642_material/642 lit review /ETT

642_Ma_Literature.pdf. diakses tanggal 19 Juni 2013

Maine, B. 2013. The Learning Pyramid. Stevenson: National Training Lab

Stevenson University

Manlove, S., Lazonder, A. W., & de Jong, T. (2006). Regulative support for

collaborative scientific inquiry learning. Journal of Computer Assisted

Learning, 22(2), p. 87–98.

Maskill, R., & Pedrosa de Jesus, H. 1997. Pupils’ questions, alternative

frameworks and the design of science teaching. International Journal of

Science Education, 19(7), 781–799.

Mayer, R.E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: using the same

instructional design methods across different media. Learning and

Instruction 13 p. 125–139.

Mayer, R.E., & Anderson. R.B. (1991). Animations Need narrations: an

experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis. Journal of Educational

Psychology Vol. 83, No. 4 p.484-490.

Mc Collum 2009. A scientific approach

to teaching.http:/kamccollum .wordpress.com/2009/08/01/a-scientific-

approach-to-teaching/last update januari 2013.

http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/

http://cedu.niu/.../642_material/642%20lit%20review%20/ETT%20642_Ma_Literature.pdf

http://cedu.niu/.../642_material/642%20lit%20review%20/ETT%20642_Ma_Literature.pdf


245

McCormick, R. 1996. Instructional methodology. In: Williams J & Williams A

(eds). Technology Education for teachers. Melbourne: MacMillan.

McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D.J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R.W. (2005). Supporting

Students’ Construction of Scientific Explanations By Fading Scaffolds in

Instructional Materials. The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

Mehrens, W.A., & Lehmann, I.J. (1991). Measurement and evaluation in

education and psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Inc

Meltzer, D.E. (2002). The Relationship between Mathematics Preparation and

Conceptual Learning Gains in Physics. A Possible Hidden Variable in

Diagnostic Pretest Score. American Journal Physics. Vol 70. N0. 12

Miao, Y., Jan, E., Adam, G., Stefan & Ulrich, H. (2012). Develoment of a

process-oriented scaffolding agent in an open-ended inquiry learning

environment. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning

Vol. 7, No. 2 p. 105-128.

Miller, GA. 2003. The Cognitive Revolution: A Historical Perspective. TRENDS

in Cognitive Sciences Vol.7 No.3 March 2003

Miska, A. (2004). Classroom Modeling: Scaffolding Learning or Stifling? An

Inquiry. https://www.ed.psu.edu/englishpds/inquiry/projects/miska04.htm.

Monica, K.M.M. (2005). Development and Validation of a test of Integrated

Science Process Skills for the Further Education and Training Learners.

Pretoria South Africa (Disertasi the Degree of Master of Science in

Science Education in the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences

University tidak diterbitkan).

Mora, JK. 2000.Teaching Conceptual and Vocabulary. San Diego University.

http://coe.sdsu.edu/people/jmora/concepts Tch.htm. diakses tanggal 10

April 2013.

Moreno, R. (2010). Educational Psychology. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (1999). "Cognitive principles of multimedia learning:

The role of modality and contiguity". Journal of Educational

Psychology 91 (2) p. 358–368.

Murwani, S. dan Sudarisman, S. (2010). Perbedaan Pengaruh Pendekatan

Contextual Teaching And Learning Dengan Metode Eksperimen Lapangan

Dan Eksperimen Laboratorium Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Peserta Didik

Klas X Di SMA Negeri 2 Yogyakarta. Surakarta: Prodi P Biologi FKIP

UNS Surakarta.

https://www.ed.psu.edu/englishpds/inquiry/projects/miska04.htm

http://coe.sdsu.edu/people/jmora/concepts%20Tch.htm


246

Najjar, L. J. (2005). A Review of the Fundamental Effect of Multimedia Graphic,

Visualization, and Usability Laboratory. Atlanta:Georgia Institute of

Technology. http://www.cc.gatech.edu/gvu/. Diakses tanggal 3 Oktober

2012.

National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education

Standards. Washington: National Academy Press.

Nieveen, N., McKenney, S., Van D. Akker (2007).“Educational design research”

dalam Educational design research.New York: Routledge

Novita, G.A.D.L., Sudana, D.N., Riatini, P.N. (2014). Pengaruh Model

Pembelajaran PBL terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa Kelas V SD

Di Gugus IV Diponegoro Kecamatan Mendoyo. Jurnal Mimbar PGSD

Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Vol: 2 No 1 Tahun 2014.

Nur, M. (2011). Strategi-strategi Belajar. Disadur dari chapter 6. Learning and

Study Strategies Buku Classroom Web-Based Approach In Higher

Education

Nur, M. (2012). Teori-teori Belajar dan Implikasinya dalam Pendekatan

Pengajaran Fisika yang Interaktif. Makalah yang dipresentasikan dalam

Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fisika di FKIP Universitas Riau 14 Januari

2012.

Nurohman, S. (2009). Penerapan Seven Jump Method Sebagai Upaya

Peningkatan Keterampilan Proses Sains Mahasiswa. Skripsi UNY tidak

diterbitkan.

Oh, P. S. (2005). Discursive roles of the teacher during class sessions for students

presenting their science investigations. International Journal of Science

Education, 27, 1825–1851

Ohora, C.J., (2007). Observation: The First Step in the Scientific Method.

Pennsylvania: Academic Standards.

Olsher, G., & Dreyfus, A. (1999). Biotechnologies as a context for enhancing

junior high-school students’ ability to ask meaningful questions about

abstract biological processes. International Journal of Science Education,

21(2), 137–153.

Orion, N. (1993). A practical model for the development and implementation of

field trips, as an integral part of the science curriculum. School Science

and Mathematics, 93,325-331.

http://www.cc.gatech.edu/gvu/

http://www.pde.state.pa.us/stateboard_ed/cwp/view.asp?a=3&Q=76716


247

Orion, N. (2007(. A Holistic Approach for Science Education For All. Eurasia

Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 2007, 3(2),

111-118

Özgelen, S. (2012). Students’ Science Process Skills within a Cognitive Domain

Framework. . Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology

Education, 2012, 8(4), 283-292

Padilla, Michael J. (1990). The Scientific Process [Versi Elektronik]. Research

Matters-to the Science Teacher Publication No. 9004, March 1, 1990

Pea, R. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related

theoretical concepts for learning, education and human activity. Journal of

the Learning Sciences 13 p. 423–451.

Piaget, J. (1988). Antara Tindakan dan Pikiran. Terjemahan Agus Cremers.

Jakarta: Gramedia.

Polman, J & Roy D P. (2010). Scaffolding Science Inquiry through

Transformative Communication. Northwestern University. Paper

presented at the NARST Annual Meeting Oak Brook.

Powell, K., & Kalina, C. 2009. Cognitive and social constructivism: Developing

tools for any effective classroom. Journal of Education, 130(2), 241-250.

Primarinda, I. (2012). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Group

Investigation (GI) Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Dan Hasil

Belajar Biologi Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 4 Surakarta (Skripsi tidak

diterbitkan) Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta.

Puntambekar, S., & Hübscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a

complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we

missed? Educational Psychologist 40 p. 1–12.

Putnam, C., O’Donnell, K., and Bertozzi, N. 2010. Scaffolding And Fading

within and Across A Six-Semester Cdio Design Sequence. Proceedings of

the 6th International CDIO Conference, École Polytechnique, Montréal,

June 15-18, 2010

Quintana, C & Barry J. F. (2006). Supporting Science Learning and Teaching

with Software-based Scaffolding. Michigan: Michigan Center for Highly

Interactive Computing, Curricula, and Classrooms in Education School.

Quintana, C., Eng, J., Carra, A., Wu, H., & Soloway, E. (1999). A case study in

extending learner centered Design through process-space analysis. In


248

Proceedings of CHI 99 Conference on human Factors in Computing

Systems (pp. 473–480). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Rahayu, I.P., Yulianingsih, U., Septiani, D., Wijaya, A.A., Haryani, S. (2011).

Inovasi Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Berbantuan Media Transvisi

Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains. Semarang: Jurusan

Kimia FMIPA Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Ramadas, J. (2009). Visual and spatial modes in science learning. The

International Journal of Science Education vol (31) 3. Research in Science

& Technological Education, Vol. 29, No.3 p. 241-255.

Ratumanan, T.G dan Laurens, T. (2011). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Surabaya: Unesa

University Press.

Riegler, A. 2001. The Impact Of Radical Constructivism On Science. Part 1: The

Paradigm, biology and cognition. Special issue of Foundations of Science

6(1–3).

Rivet, A.E., and Krajcik, J.S. (2008). Contextualizing instruction: leveraging

students’ prior knowledge and experiences to foster understanding of

middle school science. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching Vol. 45,

NO. 1 p. 79–100.

Rogoff, B. (1993). Children's guided participation and participatory appropriation

in sociocultural activity. In R. H. Wozniak & K. W. Fischer (Eds.),

Development in context (pp. 121 - 153). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.

Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York:

Oxford University Press.

Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1992). The use of scaffolds for teaching higher-

level cognitive strategies. Educational Leadership, 49(7) p.26–33.

Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., and Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to

generate questions: a review of intervention studies. Rev. Educ. Res. 66,

181–221

Rostika, N.D., (2012). Penerapan Model Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap

Keterampilan Proses Sains Pada Konsep Ekosistem Di Smp Negeri 2

Ciledug Kabupaten Cirebon (Skripsi tidak diterbitkan). Jurusan Tadris

Biologi-Fakultas Tarbiyah Institut Agama Islam Negeri Syekh Nurjati,

Cirebon

Rudolph, J.L. 2005. Epistemology for the masses: The origins of the scientific

method in American schools. History of Education Quarterly, 45, 341-376.


249

Rustaman, N. 2007. Kemampuan Dasar Bekerja Ilmiah dalam Pendidikan Sains

dan Assesmennya. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Rustaman, N. (2007). “Basic Scientific Inquiry In Science Education And Its

Assesment”. Seminar Proceeding of The First International Seminar of

Monograph of the Society for Research in Child Development, 60(4),

Serial No. 245.

Rutherford, F. J., & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for all Americans. Washington,

DC: AAAS.

Ryan, M. 2001. The Scientific Method. USA: University of Nevada

Sabahiyah, Marhaeni, A.A.I.N., Suastra. I.W. (2013). Pengaruh model

pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing terhadap keterampilan proses sains dan

penguasaan konsep ipa siswa kelas v gugus 03 wanasaba lombok timur. e-

Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program

Studi Pendidikan Dasar. Volume 3 Tahun 2013.

Sadoski, M. & Paivio, A. (2004). A dual coding theoretical model of reading. In

R. B. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of

reading (5th

ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Saida, N., Indriwati, S.E., Balqis. (2012). Penerapan Pembelajaran Kooperatif

Group Investigation Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Keterampilan

Proses Sains Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas X SMA Brawijaya Smart

School Malang. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.

Sandoval, W.A. and Reiser B.J. (2003). Explanation-Driven Inquiry: Integrating

Conceptual and Epistemic Scaffolds for Scientific Inquiry. Los Angeles:

Wiley InterScience

Schwarz B, Dreyfus T, Hershkowitz NHR. (2004). Teacher Guidance Of

Knowledge Construction. Israel: Tel Aviv University

Seelman, K.D. (1997). Communication and Technology: Women's. Work.

Proceedings of the International Leadership Forum for Women with

Disabilities; Bethesda, MD., p.114-116.

Sepel, L. M. N., Loreto, E. L. S., Rocha, J. B. T. (2009). Using a replica of

Leeuwenhoek’s microscope to teach the history of science and to motivate

students to discover the vision and the contributions of the first

microscopists. CBE-Life Sciences Education. 8, 338-343.


250

Shahali EHM and Halim L. 2010. Development and validation of a test of

integrated science process skills. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences

9 (2010) 142–146.

Sheffer, D.R. (1996). Development Psychology Chilhood and Adolescend.

Georgia: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

Shodell, M. (1995). The question-driven classroom: student questions as course

curriculum in biology. American Biology Teacher, 57(5) p. 278-281.

Silliman, E. R., Bahr, R., Beasman, J., & Wilkinson, L. C. (2000). Scaffolds for

learning to read in an inclusion classroom. Language, Speech, and Hearing

Services in Schools, 31, 265–279.

Siswono, H., Wartono, Supriyono, K.H. (2012). Pengaruh Problem Based

Learning Berbantuan Virtual Laboratory Terhadap Ketrampilan Proses

Sains dan Penguasaan Konsep Siswa di SMA. Malang: Program

Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang

Slavin, R.E. (2006). Educational Psycology.Theory and Practice. New Jersey:

Pearson Educations Inc.

Smith, B.P. (2010). Instructional strategies in family and consumer sciences:

implementing the contextual teaching and learning pedagogical model.

Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences Education, 28(1).

Solso, R.L., Otto, H.M., and Kimberly, M. (2008). Cognitive Psychology. USA:

Pearson Education Inc.

Stephenson, P. and Warwick, P. 2002. Using Concept Cartoons to Support

Progression in Pupils' Understanding of Light,Journal of Physics

Education, 37 (2). pp 145-141

Subali, B. (2010). Bias item test of divergen pattern of science Process skill and

it’s modification as creativity Test. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi

Pendidikan Tahun 14, Nomor 2, 2010

Suparno. Paul. (1997). Filsafat Konstrukivisme dalam Pendidikan. Yogyakarta:

Kanisius.

Susanti, W. (2014). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap

Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa pada Materi Laju Reaksi (Skripsi tidak

diterbitkan). Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia, Jurusan Pendidikan Ilmu

Pengetahuan Alam, Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, Universitas

Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta.


251

Tias, I.W.U. (2014). Penerapan Model Kontekstual Untuk Meningkatkan

Kemampuan Kognitif Dan Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa Sekolah

Dasar (Skripsi tidak diterbitkan). Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia,

Bandung.

Tuan, H., Chin, C., Tsai, C and Cheng, S. (2005). Investigating the effectiveness

of inquiry instruction on the motivation of different learning styles

students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 3 p.

541–566

Tytler, R. (1996). Constructivism and conceptual change views of learning in

science. Khazanah Pengajaran IPA. No. 1 (3) hal. 4-20

Utami, W.D., Dasna, I.W., Sulistina, O. (2011). Pengaruh Penerapan Model

Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap Hasil Belajar Dan

Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa Pada Materi Kelarutan Dan Hasil Kali

Kelarutan. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.

Vacca, S.J., & Levitt, R. (2009). Using scaffolding techniques to teach a lesson

about the civil war. International Journal of Humanities and Social

Science. Vol. 1 No. 18.

Van de Pol, J.E. (2012). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: exploring,

measuring, promoting and evaluating scaffolding. Amsterdam: University

of Amsterdam.

Pol, J., Volman, M., and Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in Teacher–Student

Interaction: A Decade of Research. Educational Psychology Review.

10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6

Varelas, M and Ford M. 2009. The scientific method and scientific inquiry:

Tensions in teaching and learning. USA: Wiley InterScience.

Veenman, M. V. J., Kok, R., & Blote, A. W. (2005). The relation between

intellectual and metacognitive skills in early adolescence. Instructional

Science, 33(3) p. 193–211.

Veselinovska SS, Liljana KG, and Milena D. 2011. The Effect Of Teaching

Methods on Cognitive Achievement In Biology. Studying. Procedia Social

and Behavioral Sciences 15 p. 2521–2527

Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological

processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.


252

Wakhidah, N. (2014). Implementasi Model 5 M dalam Pendekatan Saintifik pada

Mahasiswa Calon Guru. Surabaya: Laporan Preliminary Research

Wakhidah, N. 2014. Kemampuan Keterampilan Proses Sains Terpadu Mahasiswa

Calon Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya. Surabaya:

Proseeding Seminar Pendidikan Sains

Wakhidah, N. 2014. Pembelajaran Tematik Kompetensi IPA Dengan Pendekatan

Saintifik (Scientific Approach) Di Sekolah Dasar. Surabaya: Proseesing

Seminar Nasional Jurusan Pendidikan Dasar

Wakhidah, N.(2015) Scaffolding Pendekatan Saintifik. Surabaya: Jaudar Press

Wakhidah,N. (2013). Keterampilan Proses Sains Mahasiswa PGMI IAIN Sunan

Ampel Surabaya. Surabaya: Laporan Preliminary Research

Wardana. I.K., Marhaeni, A.A.I.N., Nyoman, T. (2013). Pengaruh Model

Kontekstual Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Dan Hasil Belajar Sains

Pada Siswa Kelas IV SD. e-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas

Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi Pendidikan Dasar Volume 3 Tahun

2013

Weinburgh, M. H. 2003. Changing elementary and college science teaching

through coteaching/co-generative dialogue. In D. Berlin & A. Whites

(Eds). Improving Science and Mathematics Education: Insights for a

Global Community. (pp. 73-74). Columbus, OH: ICRSME.

White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition:

Making science accessible to all students. Cognition & Instruction, 16(1),

3–118.

Wicaksono, S. 2013. Pemahaman Guru Rendah, Tantangan Kurikulum 2013.

Jakarta:

http://www.suaramerdeka.com/v1/index.php/read/cetak/2013/12/27/24756

0/Pemahaman-Guru-Rendah-Tantangan-Kurikulum-2013

Wieman, C. (2007a). A Scientific Approach to Science Education? Colorado:

University of British Columbia.

Wieman, C. (2007b). Why Not Try A Scientific Approach To Science Education?

http://www.science20.com/carl_wieman/why_not_try_scientific_approac_

science_education.

Wiggins, Grant and Jay McTighe. (2005) Understanding by Design, 2nd ed.

Alexandria VA. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

http://www.suaramerdeka.com/v1/index.php/read/cetak/2013/12/27/247560/Pemahaman-Guru-Rendah-Tantangan-Kurikulum-2013

http://www.suaramerdeka.com/v1/index.php/read/cetak/2013/12/27/247560/Pemahaman-Guru-Rendah-Tantangan-Kurikulum-2013

http://www.science20.com/carl_wieman/why_not_try_scientific_approac_science_education

http://www.science20.com/carl_wieman/why_not_try_scientific_approac_science_education


253

Wiratana, I.K., Sadia, I.W., Suma, K. (2013). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran

Kooperatif Tipe Investigasi Kelompok (Group Investigation) Terhadap

Keterampilan Proses dan Hasil Belajar Sains Siswa SMP. e-Journal

Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi

IPA. Volume 3 Tahun 2013.

Woolfolk, A. (2008). Psychology in Education. New York: Pearson Education

Limitied.

Woolfolk, A. 2008. Educational Psychology. Active Learning Edition.

Diterjemahkan oleh Helly prayitno Soecipto dan Sri Mulyantini Soecipto.

Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Xie, K., & Bradshaw, A. C. (2008). Using question prompts to support ill-

structured problem solving in online peer collaborations. International

Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 4(2) p. 148–165.

Xu JP, He ZJ, Ooi TL. 2012. Perceptual Learning To Reduce Sensory Eye

Dominance Beyond The Focus Of Top-Down Visual Attention. Vision

Research 61 (2012) 39–47

Yelland, N., & Masters, J. (2007). Rethinking scaffolding in the information

age. Computers & Education, 48, 362–382. yelland & master

Zellermayer, M., Salomon, G., Globerson, T., & Givon, H. (1991). Enhancing

writingrelated metacognitions through a computerized writing partner.

American Educational Research Journal, 28(2) p.373–391.

Zhang, J, Johnson K.A, Malin, J.T., & Smith, J.W. (2002). Human Centered

Information Visualization. Proceedings of the International Workshop om

Dynamic Visualization and Learning. Germany: Tubingen. Ed. R.

Ploetzner.

Zimmerman, B. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective.

In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-

regulation (pp.13–29). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Zimmerman, B. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An Overview. Theory

into Practice, 41(2), p. 64–70.

Zirbel, EL. (2005). Teaching To Promote Deep Understanding and Instigate

Conceptual Change for Pre-service Elementary Teachers based on Inquiry

Date post:	30-Jun-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	phungbao
View:	228 times
Download:	0 times

236digilib.uinsby.ac.id/15748/10/Daftar Pustaka.pdf · Pembelajaran Matematika SMP Kelas Vii Materi...

Documents