Date post: | 26-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | clara-hall |
View: | 213 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Putting Theory into Practice: Embedding Health & Productivity Improvement into Your Organization’s
CultureNYBGH – April 7, 2010
PSEG Company Overview
Public Service Enterprise Group (PSEG) is a publicly traded (NYSE:PEG) diversified energy company headquartered in New Jersey, and one of the ten largest electric companies in the U.S.
• Total assets: $29 billion • Total annual revenues: $13.3 billion • Employees: Approximately 10,500
• 65% Unionized• Average Age – 44• Average Years of Service - 16
• Reliability: In 2009 PSE&G was named for the fourth time as America's most reliable electric utility, by receiving the
prestigious National Reliability Excellence Award from the industry benchmarking group, PA Consulting. • In 2003, PSEG celebrated its 100th anniversary. • PSEG has paid a dividend annually since 1907. • PSEG received NJBiz Magazine's 2007 New Jersey Corporation of the Year award for financial results, leadership on
environmental issues and commitment to New Jersey. • PSEG is ranked 101 on the 2008 Forbes 400 Best Big Companies list. • PSEG is ranked 190 on the 2009 Fortune 500 list. • In 2009, PSEG was named for a second year to the Dow Jones Sustainability North America Index (DJSI North America). • PSEG was ranked 11 on New Jersey Business magazine's 2009 100 Top Employers list. • PSEG was recognized by New Jersey Monthly magazine as one of their 2009 Great Places to Work.
• PSEG's principal subsidiaries are:
• Public Service Electric and Gas Company (PSE&G)• PSEG Power• PSEG Energy Holdings• PSEG Service Corporation
A Brief History of Culture Change
After 32 fatalities in 27 years, PSEG had to make major changes in the health and safety culture.
• What was needed? • A total commitment to transform the culture and a plan for action. • It wasn’t enough to say that health and safety is the #1 priority. • Hundreds of people got involved.
• Everyone - from meter readers, generating station workers, linemen, customer services representatives, office workers, supervisors, managers and senior management – had to believe it and get involved!
• Results could not be expected overnight• Patience was necessary.
• Most best-in-class companies achieve significant culture change in 3-5 years through constant reinforcement of the health and safety message, hard work, significant employee involvement, and consistent support from management.
PSEG was on its way:• We benchmarked best-in-class companies,• We took a long hard look at ourselves internally, and• We got lots of people involved to develop a plan for action that is now being implemented and continues to evolve.• A systematic approach would be required as the foundation for an accident-free work environment and a healthy workforce. • Under strong leadership, PSEG has undergone a dramatic shift in its health & safety culture. • The results have been overwhelmingly positive.
• OSHA Recordable 1994 = 5.26• Target 2010 – 1.10
Health and Wellness At PSEG
Medifit•On Site Fitness Facility Operations
•Health Promotion, Education/Communication•Unstaffed Fitness Center Audits
•Exercise Reimbursement Program•Weight Management and Nutrition
Coaching
Medifit•On Site Fitness Facility Operations
•Health Promotion, Education/Communication•Unstaffed Fitness Center Audits
•Exercise Reimbursement Program•Weight Management and Nutrition
Coaching
HewittYour Benefits Desktop
HewittYour Benefits Desktop
StayWell•Health Risk Assessment•Lifestyle Management
•On Line Education/Resources
StayWell•Health Risk Assessment•Lifestyle Management
•On Line Education/Resources
Optimal Health •Disease ManagementOptimal Health •Disease Management
Prevention Works-Pro-Activity•On the Ground Physical Therapists
•Injury Prevention•Education, Physical Activity and Nutrition
Counseling•First Response Soft Tissue Injuries
Prevention Works-Pro-Activity•On the Ground Physical Therapists
•Injury Prevention•Education, Physical Activity and Nutrition
Counseling•First Response Soft Tissue Injuries
Health Plans Resources
•Aetna•Horizon BCBS
•Medco
Health Plans Resources
•Aetna•Horizon BCBS
•Medco
Grass RootsHealth & Safety and Wellness
Council•Communication
•Support •Engagement
Grass RootsHealth & Safety and Wellness
Council•Communication
•Support •Engagement
PSEGEmployee Health
Work/Life Life Solutions•Employee Assistance Program
(EAP)•CareBridge
Work/Life Life Solutions•Employee Assistance Program
(EAP)•CareBridge
Aramark•Healthy Food Selections
•Cafeteria, Catering, Vending
Aramark•Healthy Food Selections
•Cafeteria, Catering, Vending
Strategic Planning•Vendor Operations Management
•Partner Integration •Program Development & Implementation
•Communications•ROI Measurement
Strategic Planning•Vendor Operations Management
•Partner Integration •Program Development & Implementation
•Communications•ROI Measurement
Community Outreach•Non Profits – AHA, ACS
•Pharmas•Weight Watchers, NutriSystem
Community Outreach•Non Profits – AHA, ACS
•Pharmas•Weight Watchers, NutriSystem
Wellness is Not Just a Program…It’s a Health Improvement Strategy
On Site Health Services• Cardiovascular Disease Screenings
•Flu Shots
On Site Health Services• Cardiovascular Disease Screenings
•Flu Shots
Absence Management•Workers Comp – Work Hardening/Conditioning
•Wellness Program Integration/Awareness
Absence Management•Workers Comp – Work Hardening/Conditioning
•Wellness Program Integration/Awareness
PSEG Workforce Health Profile
• Top 3 Diagnosis Related to Disability Absence
1. Musculoskeletal 2. Mental Health 3. Cardiovascular/All Other
• Predominately Male • 84% Male/16% Female
• Highly Unionized – 65%
• Top 3 Diagnosis Related to Medical Claim Payments
1. Orthopedics/Rheumatology (Musculoskeletal)
2. Cardiology 3. Gastroenterology
• Top 3 Therapeutic Classes Related to Rx Drug Payments
1. Cardiovascular 2. Anti infectives3. Psychotherapeutics
• Average Age: 44• Years of Service: 15.8
Demographics
2009 Risk Factors
Top Risks Overall Health Status
1. Weight 79%
2. Eating 67%
3. Stress 60%
4. Blood Pressure 56%
5. Preventive Exams 54%
6. Exercise 45%
7. Back Pain 45%
8. Cholesterol 39%
9. Well Being (Depression) 20%
10. Smoking 12%
• Low risk 11%• Medium risk 30%• High risk 59%
Source: 2009 Health Risk Assessment and 2008 Biometrics from CVD Health Screenings
7
Number of Health Risks per Employee
59%
3%
39%
57%
13%
53%
34%30%
11%
0%
15%
30%
45%
60%
75%
0-2 Risks 3-5 Risks 6+ Risks
Pe
rce
nt
of
Em
plo
ye
es
Healthy Company Norm PSEG
Health and Safety – A Cultural Change Partner
Link ‘Health’ to Safety
• PSEG Health & Safety System• Commitment Statement• Councils
• Enterprise (highest level)• Medical Director• Wellness Leader
• Lines of Business• Local
• 12 Components• Personal Health & Wellness• Wellness Council
• Each work location has a Wellness Representative
• Local office health advocate• Disseminate informational materials• Update bulletin boards• Tailgate messages• All Hands Wellness presentations
Personal Health & Wellness is Essential to Achieving Safety’s Target Zero
• Individual health status is directly linked to:• The risk of being injured
(both on and off the job)• The severity of an injury• The duration of recovery/
recuperation of an injury • Most significant predictor of injury is health status, tobacco use, stress level and weight.
• Employees <35 and overweight have 72% greater risk of injury.
• Employees who perceive health status as other than excellent have 65% greater risk of injury
• Smokers, if injured, are 72% more likely to have an incident resulting in lost time.
Source: 2003 Union Pacific Railroad, Health & Safety Impact Study
Health & Wellness Continuum
Take Control of Your Health with PSEG Health & Wellness Resources
Determine YourHealth Risks
Build Health inYour Routine
Get the Right CareAt the Right time
Manage ChronicHealth Conditions
• Health Risk Assessment (HRA)
• Health Screenings
• Optimal Health Disease Management
• EAP
• Prevention Works
• CareBridge
• Health Plan Resources
• NextSteps Lifestyle Management
• CHAMP Fitness Centers
• Exercise Reimbursement
• Staywell Online Tools & Helpline
•Weight Watchers/ NutriSystem
•Influenza Vaccines Supported by Health Education and InformationSupported by Health Education and Information
Visit Your Benefits Desktop often for the latest information about your benefits, health and wellness...there is always something new.
http://www.pseg.com/benefits
TARGET 60% in
3 or more programs
Company 0 Programs 1 Program 2 Programs 3+ Programs
PSEG Overall 26.1% 15.6% 16.2% 42.1%
Holdings 43.4% 22.6% 21.7% 12.3%
PSE&G 26.1% 15.6% 16.2% 42.1%
PSEG Power 35.4% 20.6% 14.5% 29.6%
Services 17.2% 13.4% 14.8% 54.5%
% of Employees Participating in ….
Driving Results through Participation/Engagement…2008 Wellness Scorecard
Engaging the Right People (93% are Moderate to High Risk)
Participation in more Programs produces Higher Results • Participation in 1 program vs. 5 programs
• Medical/Rx Drug Costs – 5% lower• WC & Disability Lost Time – 19% lower• Disability Recurrence Rates – 7.1% lower
The Impact of PSEG’s Health Management Strategy
• A comprehensive evaluation plan to assess PSEG’s health management strategy outcomes was recently completed.
• The study focused on:• Health wellness program participation rates,• characteristics of participants and non-participants in PSEG’s health/wellness programs,• health outcomes, and • medical and productivity cost impact over time.
• Findings - PSEG’s health wellness programs are showing signs of success:• Employees who are engaged in their health by participating in PSEG’s health wellness programs are showing
lower health care and absenteeism/disability costs and trends.• Program participation shows a dose-effect with more medical and productivity cost moderation associated with higher levels
of participation (2+ program vs. 1 program vs. never participants)
• Cost-benefit analysis demonstrates an overall program ROI of 1.1 (medical costs only) and 1.46 (medical and productivity) after the second year of the program.
• PSEG’s ROI reflects results since redesign and launch of it’s health and wellness program since 2008. An ROI of 1:1 (i.e. breakeven) is considered reasonable for earlier years of program implementation.
• According to the National Business Group on Health*• A mature, comprehensive health management program with a highly engaged population can expect to see a
minimum $3 return for ever $1 invested (3:1) after 3 to 5 years.
* Source: National Business Group on Health, (2008) Improving Employee Health – Planning, Implementing and Achieving Targeted Outcomes, p.5.
Health Wellness Program Participation Impact on Employees – Medical & Drug Cost and Trends
Employees who were enrolled in a medical plan from 2006 – 2008 were classified into one of three categories (N=8,451) to determine the impact of participation in PSEG’s health/wellness programs on health care and absenteeism/disability costs and trends.1. Never Participant: Employees who did not participate
in a program 2007 and 20082. 1 Program Participant: Employees who participated in
one program in 2007 or 20083. 2+ Program Participant: Employees who participated
in two or more programs in 2007 and/or 2008
Medical cost trends show a dose-effect* as program participation increases.
Those individuals who participate in multiply health/wellness programs have lower health care costs.
From 2006 to 2008, the ‘2+ program’ participant group experienced a 26% increase in health care costs while the ‘never participant’ group increased 68%.
Individuals engaged in their health tend to have lower health care costs.
Cost Trends for Employees**Medical + Drug Costs (N=8,451)
$3,870
$4,551
$3,784
$2,704
$4,272
$3,702
$3,012
$3,398$3,083
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
2006 2007 2008
Never participant (N=2,265)
1 program participant (N=1,221)
2+ program participant (N=4,965)
*Increasing impact on cost outcomes is evident with increasing program intensity **Employees enrolled in medical coverage during all reporting years
13
2006 2008 $ Change % Change
Never Participated $ 2,704 $ 4,551 $ 1,847 68%
1 Program $ 3,012 $ 4,272 $ 1,260 42%
2+ Programs $ 3,083 $ 3,870 $ 787 26%
Health Wellness Program Participation Impact on Employees – Lost Productivity Cost and Trends
Lost productivity cost trends for absenteeism/ disability also shows a dose-effect* as program participation increases.
Those individuals who participate in multiply health/wellness programs have lower absenteeism/disability costs.
From 2007 to 2008, the ‘never participated’ group showed the highest increase (8%) while the ‘2+ program’ participant group showed a slight decrease (-1%).
Individuals who are engaged in their health tend to have less absences.
14
Absenteeism/Disability Costs for Employees**(N=8,451)
$3,134
$2,714
$2,085
$2,897$2,640
$2,104
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
2007 2008
Never Participant (N=2,265)1 Program Participant (N= 1,221)2+ Program Participant (N= 4,965)
*Increasing impact on cost outcomes is evident with increasing program intensity **Employees enrolled in medical coverage during all reporting years
2007 2008 $ Change % Change
Never Participated $ 2,897 $ 3,134 $ 237 8%
1 Program $ 2,640 $ 2,714 $ 74 3%
2+ Programs $ 2,104 $ 2,085 $ (19) -1%
Health Wellness Program Participation…Always a Challenge
Health Wellness Program Participation 2007 - 2009
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000
HRA
CVD Screening
Influenza Vaccines
CHAMP
Exercise Reimbursement
EAP
Prevention Works
Lifestyle Mgmt
Disease Mgmt
2009 3,448 2,608 4,313 978 708 867 884 953 1,492
2008 4,125 4,254 3,941 1,149 509 862 5,267 1,251 1,469
2007 1,067 4,135 3,524 958 474 1,030 3,885 294 237
HRACVD
ScreeningInfluenza Vaccines
CHAMPExercise
Reimbursement
EAPPrevention
WorksLifestyle
MgmtDisease
Mgmt
•Comprehensive program design•Integrated incentives•Integrated, comprehensive communication plan•Strong senior management support•Dedicated onsite staff
•Multiple program modalities (phone, mail, online)•Population-based awareness building activities•Biometric health screenings•Vendor integration
PSEG utilizes 9 Best Practice Elements to Maximize Participation and Engagement: