+ All Categories
Home > Documents > QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the...

QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the...

Date post: 03-Mar-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 29 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
37
QA OF TILE PUMA PCCS SEPARATE EFFECT TEST DATA IN 2005 Prepared by Sung Won Choi and Jun Yang Prepared for U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission PURDUE U N I V E R S I T Y March 2006 Purdue University School of Nuclear Engineering
Transcript
Page 1: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

QA OF TILE PUMA PCCS SEPARATE EFFECTTEST DATA IN 2005

Prepared bySung Won Choi and Jun Yang

Prepared forU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

PURDUEU N I V E R S I T Y

March 2006

Purdue UniversitySchool of Nuclear Engineering

Page 2: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

Table of Contents

1. Introduction ..................................... 32. Confirmation of DAS Channel Numbers ...................................... 33. Description of Instrumentation for the Test Facility ...................................... 34. Test Condition Summary ...................................... 55. Determination of Steady State Data ..................................... 66. Instrument Signal Evaluation ...................................... 7

6.1 Drain Line Temperature ...... 7...............................76.2 Centerline Temperature ...................................... 76.3 Magnetic flow meter..............................................................................................76.4 LT-PC-02 Calibration ...................................... 8

Appendix A. Instrumentation Calibration Results ...................................... 9Appendix B. Lists of Instrumentation ..................................... 15

List of Tables

Table 3.1 Instrumentation ..... 3..................................3Table 3.2 PCCS Instrumentation ...... 4.................................4Table 4.1 Test Data Summary ...... 5.................................5Table B. 1 Thermocouples ....................................... 15Table B.2 Level, Pressure and Flow Meters ....................................... 17Table B.3 Doubtful and Failed Instrumentation ............. .......................... 17Table B.4 Symbols Used in Isometric Drawings ................. ...................... 18

2/37

Page 3: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

.5

1. Introduction

The purpose of this memo is to explain the QA of PCCS separate effect test data in2005. The key check list of the data and typical data trends are presented. In appendices,more detailed tables and drawings related with the instrumentation are added. Therevised data report for the previous one, PU/NE-05-17, will be submitted based on thisdata QA.

2. Confirmation of DAS Channel Numbers

As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between theDAS connection of instrumentation and the DAS software was confirmed. Everychannel number in the DAS software matched with the DAS hardware number. All thetest data were checked, and the average values and any suspicious data trends wererecorded by two persons independently.

3. Description of Instrumentation for the Test Facility

The instrumentation used in the PCCS separate effect tests are summarized in Tables3.1 and 3.2. In Appendix B, the detained lists and locations of instrumentation are shownin Tables B.1 through B.3, and Figures B.1 through B.8, respectively, and the relatedcomponents and pipe connections are shown in Figures B.9 through B.19.

Table 3.1 Instrumentation

Component Quantity measured Instrumentation

Power Heat Controller

RPV Temperature Type K TC

Pressure Pressure transducer

Water level Differential Pressure Gauge

Flow rate Nozzle Flow Meter

Main Steam Line B Flow rate Vortex Flow Meter

Temperature Type K TC

Air mass flow rate Mass Flow controllerAir Supply Line

Temperature Type K TC

Drywell Water level Differential Pressure Gauge

Temperature Type K TC

3/37

Page 4: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

Pressure Pressure transducer

Temperature Type K TC

Wetwell Pressure Pressure transducer

Water level I Differential Pressure Gauge

Table 3.2 PCCS Instrumentation

Component Quantity Location Instrumentmeasured

Supply line Type K TC

Drain line Type K TC

Temperature Venting line Type K TC

Condenser pool Type K TC

Tube surface Type K TC

Centerline of condenser tube Type K TC

PCCS Differential PCCS inlet and outlet Differential pressure gauge

pressure PCCS outlet and wetwell Differential pressure gauge

Water level PCCS Drain Tank Differential pressure gauge

Steam flow rate Supply line Vortex flow meter

CondensatePCCS Drain Line Magnetic flow meter

Flow Rate

4/37

Page 5: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

4. Test Condition Summary

The key information for the test data is summarized in Table 4.1. For the 2005 testconditions, two test data sets were added in the long term cooling mode, which arerepeats of the 2004 test conditions. In the blowdown mode, one transient data set(BL723F) was removed and BL723E had a somewhat quasi-steady-state condition interms of the drain line flow rate because it was difficult to keep the steady-state boundaryconditions in the blowdown test due to a large energy transfer from RPV to DW and SP.These data can be used as a reference to see the parametric trend. For the cyclic ventingtest, two data sets were removed because they did not satisfy the PUMA QArequirements.

Table 4.1 Test Data Summary

Test No. m I m air Pressure TE-PCB-12"'_ (kg/sec) (gisec) (kPa)

LM807A 0.025 0.0 200 NAN}LT912A 0.026 0.0 200 AM3sLM807B 0.026 0.0 230 ALT727B 0.027 0.0 230 ALM822C 0.028 0.0 260 NALT727C 0.028 0.0 260 ALT823D 0.028 0.0 300 NA

LT718B 0.020 0.0 230 A

LT711C 0.021 0.0 260 A

BL721AR 0.070 0.0 220 A

BL723D 0.062 7.5 220 A

BL731 BR 0.077 0.0 260 A

BL723E 0.062 0.0 260 A

BL723C 0.071 0.0 300 A

BL723G 0.055 10.8 300 A

CY602A 0.031 0.0 220 NA

CY602D 0.032 0.1 220 NA

CY903D2 0.032 0.6 220 A

CY903D4 0.033 1.3 220 A

5/37

Page 6: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

CY602B 0.033 0.0 240 NA

CY602E 0.033 0.1 240 NA

CY604E2 0.034 0.6 240 NA

CY903C 0.033 0.0 260 A

CY604F 0.034 0.1 260 NA

CY602F2 0.034 0.6 260 NA

CY903F4 0.033 1.3 260 A

CH830A 0.042 0.0 220 A

CH826D2 0.040 0.6 220 NA

CH826D4 0.040 1.3 220 NA

CH828E4 0.041 1.3 240 NA

CH621 C 0.039 0.0 240 NA

CH828F4 0.042 1.3 260 NA

CM701 D 0.031 0.2 220 A

CM701 D1 0.031 0.4 220 A

CM701 D2 0.030 0.6 220 A

CM81 OE6 0.027 1.3 220 NA

CM616E 0.034 0.1 240 A

CM822E2 0.030 0.7 240 NA

CM707E4 0.029 1.3 240 A

CM81 OD4 0.027 1.9 240 NA

CM616C 0.031 0.0 260 A

CM822F2 0.031 0.6 260 NA

(1) Thermocouple (See Section 6.1)(2) NA: Not Available(3) A: Available

5. Determination of Steady State Data

The steady-state time period was defined as the period for which the mean values ofall four control parameters, such as the inlet steam flow rate in the PCCS supply line andcondensate water flow rate in the drain line, are equal to or less than 10% of the deviationfrom the mean value. The mean values are obtained from the data during a minimum of

10 minutes period.

6/37

Page 7: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

The test data were recorded over a time period longer than 10 minute. The steady-state data were confirmed from the post-test data reduction processes such as energybalances, mass balances and the averages of temperature profiles.

6. Instrument Signal Evaluation

The steady-state time period was determined by using the period, during which thedata revealed little variation in the whole recording time. It was necessary to remove thetransient time period from the data at the beginning or end of the test recording time toprevent confusion to the data reader.

6.1 Drain Line Temperature

Among the PCCS drain line temperature measures; some of the data in PCCS line Bwere not available due to the malfunction of the thermocouple. The temperatures of TE-PCB-14 were recorded for every test but the quality of the data is questionable andtherefore they have been removed from the instrumentation list as shown in Table B. 1.TE-PCB-12 showed a temperature profile similar to those for TE-PCA-12 and TE-PCC-12 as we expected. For a part of the data, TE-PCB-12 thermocouple has bad connectionsamong the whole test data. In this case, we removed the TE-PCB-12 in the data list.These temperatures are used for data reduction to obtain the condensate water density byaveraging the three TE-PC-12 temperatures. However, from the normal measurementconditions, these three temperature readings are almost the same as the other drain linetemperature. Tests that are not available for this TE-PCB-12 would not make anyproblem in obtaining the average temperature of the condensate water in the drain line.In Table 4.1, the availability of TE-PCB-12 was summarized for each test data set.

6.2 Centerline Temperature

The centerline temperature profile for a mixture flow with noncondensable gas with aPCCS pool water level around 60 % showed a large fluctuation in the middle of thecondenser tube. These phenomena could be explained by the PCCS pool water inventoryeffect. This high void fraction of the pool water near the TE-PC-07 locations has atransient condenser tube wall temperature, which induces fluctuations of condensationboundary condition in the tube.

For a high mixture flow rate in the blowdown mode, the three centerlinethermocouples showed almost the same high temperatures, which are close to the PCCSinlet line temperature.

However, the temperature profile of the inlet flow with low noncondensable gasfraction showed a fluctuation and a transition to a different temperature level. This couldbe explained by the phenomena that the accumulated noncondensable gas in thecondenser tube was vented out; the condensation rate increased; and consequently, thesteam partial pressure was reduced.

6.3 Magnetic flow meter

7/37

Page 8: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

The magnetic flow meter was calibrated using the water level change of the drain tank.Appendix A shows the results and equations of the data calibrations. By using calibratedreading of magnetic flow meter, a more accurate heat and mass balance can be obtainedand the data from the calibrated magnetic flow meter showed a good agreement with theflow rates obtained by the drain tank water level change.

6.4 LT-PC-02 Calibration

Appendix A shows the LT-PC-02 calibration results. The pressure calibrator has theerror range of 0.46 kPa, which is larger than the difference among the LT-PC-02 readings.Therefore we can only see the trend of the bias error from the calibration results.

8/37

Page 9: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

Appendix A. Instrumentation Calibration Results

PCCS -A Drain Line

1.8 -_-c~T 1.5 --E- 1.2-a)

2:0.93.0

, 0.6 -0)anCc0.3

Mw

0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5Flow Rate in Drain Tank (mA3/hr)

Figure A. 1. Magnetic Flow Meter Calibration in PCCS Drain Line A

1.8

9/37

Page 10: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

PCCS -B Drain Line

1.81 y = 1.1132x + 0.0066

<' 1 .5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -E

a, 1.2>

060

CZ 0.3CZ

00.000 0.300 0.600 0.900 1.200 1.500 1.800

Flow Rate in Drain Tank (m^3/hr)

Figure A.2. Magnetic Flow Meter Calibration in PCCS Drain Line B

10/37

Page 11: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

PCCS -C Drain Line

-c3

)27 27--< 24 y = 1y.101 7x + 0.0099

2.1 .5~1.8

3 1. -- -- -------- ---------0

^:s 1° -- --- - - -- -- -- ------ - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - ----0

U . I - -,-- - -.-. .-.-

0.00 0.30 0.60 0.90 1.20 1.50 1.80 2.10 2.40 2.70 3.00

Flow Rate in Drain Tank( m^'3/hr)

Figure A.3. Magnetic Flow Meter Calibration in PCCS Drain Line C

11/37

Page 12: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

Calibration of LT-PCA-02

|I* Commnuicator C DAS - Linear (Commnuicator)|

28

26

24

IL 22

20

18

1616 18 20 22 24

Pressure calibrator setting value (kPa)

26 28

Figure A.4. Calibration for LT-PCA-02

12/37

Page 13: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

Calibration of LT-PCB-02

I* Commnuicator * DAS - Linear (Commnuicator)

16 18 20 22 24

Pressure calibrator setting value (kPa)

26 28

Figure A.5. Calibration for LT-PCB-02

13/37

Page 14: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

Calibration of LT-PCC-02

* Commnuicator c DAS - Linear (Commnuicator)|

28

26

24

0- 22

20

18

1616 18 20 22 24 26

Pressure calibrator setting value (kPa)

28

Figure A.6. Calibration for LT-PCC-02

14/37

Page 15: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

Appendix B. Lists of Instrumentation

Table B.1 Thermocouples

TAG NUMBER COMPONENT INSTRUMENT RANGE UNCERTAINTY

TE-AL-01 AIR LINE INLET Type K TC 0-2500C 2.20C

TE-RPV-01 VESSEL Type K TC 0-250°C 2.20C

TE-RPV-02 VESSEL Type K TC 0-250°C 2.20C

TE-RPV-33 VESSEL Type K TC 0-250°C 2.2°C

TE-MSB-01 STEAM LINE Type K TC 0-250°C 2.20C

TE-DW-03 DRYWELL Type K TC 0-250°C 2.20C

TE-DW-04 DRYWELL Type K TC 0-250°C 2.20C

TE-DW-1O DRYWELL Type K TC 0-250°C 2.2°C

TE-DW-11 DRYWELL Type K TC 0-2500C 2.2°C

TE-SP-01 WETWELL Type K TC 0-2500C 2.2°C

TE-SP-02 WETWELL Type K TC 0-250°C 2.2°C

TE-SP-03 WETWELL Type K TC 0-250°C 2.20 C

TE-SP-06 WETWELL Type K TC 0-250°C 2.2°C

TE-SP-12 WETWELL Type K TC 0-250°C 2.2°C

TE-SP-13 WETWELL Type K TC 0-250°C 2.20C

TE-SP-14 WETWELL Type K TC 0-2500C 2.20C

TE-PCA-01 PCCS Type K TC 0-250°C 2.2°C

TE-PCA-02 PCCS Type K TC 0-2500C 2.20C

TE-PCA-04 PCCS Type K TC 0-250°C 2.20C

TE-PCA-05 PCCS Type K TC 0-2500C 2.20C

TE-PCA-06 PCCS Type K TC 0-250°C 2.20C

TE-PCA-07 PCCS Type K TC 0-250°C 2.2°C

TE-PCA-08 PCCS Type K TC 0-250*C 2.20C

TE-PCA-09 PCCS Type K TC 0-250°C 2.20C

TE-PCA-10 PCCS Type K TC 0-2500C 2.20C

TE-PCA-11 PCCS Type K TC 0-2500C 2.20C

TE-PCA-12 PCCS Type K TC 0-2500C 2.2°C

TE-PCA-13 PCCS Type K TC 0-250°C 2.20C

TE-PCA-14 PCCS Type K TC 0-250°C 2.20C

TE-PCB-i1 PCCS Type K TC 0-250°C 2.20C

TE-PCB-02 PCCS Type K TC 0-2500C 2.2°C

TE-PCB-03 PCCS Type K TC 0-2500C 2.20C

TE-PCB-04 PCCS Type K TC 0-250°C 2.20C

TE-PCB-05 PCCS Type K TC 0-250°C 2.2°C

15/37

Page 16: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

TAG NUMBER COMPONENT INSTRUMENT RANGE UNCERTAINTY

TE-PCB-06 PCCS Type K TC 0-2500C 2.2°C

TE-PCB-07 PCCS Type K TC 0-2500C 2.20C

TE-PCB-08 PCCS Type K TC 0-2500C 2.20C

TE-PCB-09 Pccs Type K TC 0-250tC 2.20C

TE-PCB-1Q PCCS Type K TC 0-250°C 2.20C

TE-PCB-11 PCCS Type K TC 0-250°C 2.20C

TE-PCB-12 PCCS Type K TC 0-250°C 2.20C

TE-PCB-13 PCCS Type K TC 0-2500C 2.20C

TE-PCB-14 PCCS Type K TC 0-250°C 2.20C

TE-PCC-01 PCCS Type K TC 0-250°C 2.20C

TE-PCC-02 PCCS Type K TC 0-2500C 2.20C

TE-PCC-03 Pccs Type K TO 0.2O0C 2.20C

TE-PCC-04 PCCS Type K TC 0-2500C 2.20C

TE-PCC-05 PCCS Type K TC 0-250°C 2.20C

TE-PCC-06 PCCS Type K TC 0-250°C 2.2°C

TE-PCC-07 PCCS Type K TC 0-250°C 2.2°C

TE-PCC-08 PCCS Type K TC 0-250°C 2.2°C

TE-PCC-07 PCCS Type K TC 0-250°C 2.2°C

TE-PCC-11 PCCS Type K TC 0-250°C 2.2°C

TE-PCC-12 PCCS Type K TC 0-250°C 2.20C

TE-PCC-13 PCCS Type K TC 0-250°C 2.2°C

TE-PCC-14 PCCS Type K TC 0-250°C 2.20C

16/37

Page 17: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

Table B.2 Level, Pressure and Flow Meters

TAG NUMBER COMPONENT INSTRUMENT UNIT UNCERTAINTY

LT-RPV-14 VESSEL Differential Pressure Gauge kPa 0.23

PT-RPV-01 VESSEL Absolute Pressure Transducer kPa 4.80

PT-RPV-02 VESSEL Absolute Pressure Transducer kPa 3.20

FT-MSB-02 MSL Vortex Flow Meter kg/h 6.22

PT-DW-02 DRYWELL Absolute Pressure Transducer kPa 2.20

PT-DW-04 DRYWELL Differential Pressure Gauge kPa 0.17

LT-SP-01 WETWELL Differential Pressure Gauge kPa 0.10

PT-SP-01 WETWELL Absolute Pressure Transducer kPa 1.60

FT-PCA-01 PCCS Vortex Flow Meter m /h 3.40

FT-PCA-03 PCCS Magnetic Flow Meter m /h 0.01

FT-PCB-01 PCCS Vortex Flow Meter m /h 3.40

FT-PCB-02 PCCS Magnetic Flow Meter miih 0.01

FT-PCC-01 PCCS Vortex Flow Meter ii?/ 3.40

FT-PCC-02 PCCS Magnetic Flow Meter miWh 0.01

LT-PCA-02 PCCS Differential Pressure Gauge kPa 0.46

LT-PCB-02 PCCS Differential Pressure Gauge kPa 0.46

LT-PCC-02 PCCS Differential Pressure Gauge kPa 0.15

LT-PC-03 PCCS Differential Pressure Gauge kPa 0.10

LT-PCR-01 PCCS DRAIN TANK Differential Pressure Gauge kPa 0.10

Table B.3 Doubtful and Failed Instrumentation

TAG NUMBER COMPONENT Status

TE-PCB-14 PCCS B drain line Doubtful reading

TE-PCB-12 PCCS B drain line Malfunction In some of test data

TE-PCA-03 PCCS A Pool Fluctuation

TE-PCC-09 PCCS C tube wall Malfunction

17/37

Page 18: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

Table B.4 Symbols Used in Isometric Drawings

DWI MOTORIZED BALL VALVE

3 MANUAL BALL VALVE

c M A ANUAL GLOBE VALVE

< NOZZLE

VENTURI

MAGNETIC FLOW METER

CAPACITANCE METER

VORTEX FLOW METER

T ORIFICE PLATE

THERMOCOUPLE

RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE DEVICE (RTD)

> CHECK VALVE

mk LIFT VALVE

FLEXIBLE COUPLING

18/37

Page 19: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

Figure B. 1 RPV Pressure and Level Transmitter Locations

19/37

Page 20: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

I

R = 305 mm

TE-RPV-67- R = 0 mm

TO-RPV-01 (R = 305 mm)1ETr 4HV-Ul:n7I .

TE-RPV-01:02Z

1525 mm

FW tR = 276 mm

TE-RPV-31: 34

JUUUJUUI

I .~

4 DPV

- TE-RPV-10 (R = 0 mm)

4 TE-RPV-09 (R = 165 mm)

5638 mm

624 mm

TE-RPV-35: 38

624 mm

I TE-RPV-39: 42 .

f TE-RPV-6&--'

624 mm GDDI TE-RPV-43:46

_ GZi24 mm R =70 mm F5;

R =145 mm -_I TE-RPV-47: 50 _

TE-RPV-08 (R = 0 mm)

1 TO-RPV-02- TE-RPV-07 (R = 165 mm)

TE-RPV-06 (R = 0 mm)

A TE-RPV-05 ( R = 165 mm) 5518 mmN-

e

_ TE-RPV-04 (R =

q] R =TE-RPV-03 (R =

TE-RP V-11: 12

0 mm)

624 mm- TE-RPV-19:27

R = 233 mm-

TE-RPV-51:54

-I

"I I IO ._1 I II I.,\

-A _N.".qe L

108 m165 m244 mr-n)

m 3461 mm

ITE-RPV-13:14 214 mn

TE-RPV-15:16 213 mn

_==ATE-RPV-17:18 214 mn

TE-RPV-63:66 222 mm

1280 mm

T-P-

380 mm TE-RPV-69. I TE-RPV-55: 58

500 mm638 mm

- TE-RPV-59:62

- TE-RPV-70 (R

871 mm(R = 159 mm)

= 20 mm)

it 1 I I -.

Tag Name I I Angle I Tag Name j Azimutit1ERV6I TE-RPV-52 1

t TE-RPV-53 241

IV-54

T TE-RPV-32

TE-RPV-83TE-RPV-34TE-RPV-35

-__ TE-RPV-36TE-RPV-37 8

I TE-RPV-38 -

i TE-RPV-39 || TE-RPV-40 -

TE-RPV-4tTE-RPV-42 1'-43 6t1 1

16161 CO-F151 CQ-I241 CQ-RPV-03331 1 TO-RPV-0161 TQ-FIPV-02_-4

Figure B.2 RPV Thermocouple & Heat Flux Sensor Locations

20/37

Page 21: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

El. 6321 n(w.r.t. RPV bo

To Wetwell Pen. 9

To Wetwell To Wetwell Pen. 9

Figure B.3 PCCS Pressure and Level Transmitter Locations

21/37

Page 22: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

TE-PCX -- -> X =

TE-PCX-02,03,04,05TE-PCX-06,07,08

TE-PCX-09,10,1 1R = 562 mm-\

A, B, or C condensers

--- > water temperature in pool--- > fliud temperature at the centerline of tube

--- > outer surface temperature of tube

El. 6321(wrt. RPV

TE-PCX- 12

Therm co u p le

Cross-sectional view of tube

Figure B.4 PCCS Thermocouple Locations

22/37

Page 23: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

01 *-,

> PT-DW-01:02 r

0

Horizontal VentUpper Drywell

4801 mm

El. -930 mm(w.r.t. RPV bottom)

Figure B.5 Drywell Pressure and Level Transmitter Locations

23/37

Outlet

Page 24: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

5R 762 mm

AI-DW-01 - R - 800 mmR = 1372 mm

248 mm

t 6-DW-12

3e2

mm

6 | TE-5W- I 3263

oD*-02

Ad-DW-02

425 mm -

TE-& 1- 5/ -

TE-DW-02

Ku

-i29mm

260 mm

255 mmSt-oWv--I

188 mm

T7

- 6- -TE-66-14ToW-o*-3

- Al-DW-03

2061 mm7042 mm

6238 mm -57 mm

TE-Sw-o*

* TE-D*-15

. M-D0-04

- AA-DW-04

5982 mm

4091 mm

- Al-DW-05

3105 mm

2496 mm

10

TE-Dt -07

2119mm

1135 mm

250mm|TE-D0-0O(r. -930 -m

(-A6. RPV W016-) -

\ S = 135 mm

Tag Name Azimuthal Angle Tag Name Azimuthal AngleTE-DW-01 91 TE-DW-13 286TE-DW-02 121 TE-DW-14 271TE-DW-03 121 TE-DW-15 271TE-DW-04 271 CQ-DW-01 286TE-DW-05 271 CQ-DW-02 271TE-DW-06 271 CQ-DW-03 200TE-DW-07 271 CQ-DW-04 271TE-DW-08 271 Al-DW-01 181TE-DW-09 121 Al-DW-02 271TE-DW-10 121 Al-DW-03 271TE-DW-1i1 121 Al-DW-04 271TE-DW-12 286 Al-DW-05 271

Figure B.6 Drywell Thermocouple and Heat Flux Sensor Locations

24/37

Page 25: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

Figure B.7 Wetwell Pressure and Level Transmitter Locations

25/37

Page 26: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

TO-SP-01

261 mmf

TO-SP-02

2633 mm

l l I / R 5 700 mm

I

/ 2 | ~~TE-Sp-1Z/ I I

TI S

I I TE-SP-02 *

R = 762 mm I

R = 457 m - P-03 I

TE-SP-04 O-S

R = 991 mm

/\ Nominal water level

I F 1

203 mm

203 mm

203 mm

-E'TE-SP-12 & TE-SPi`13 I

I II TE-SP-05

I TE-SP-06

I I

I [§ ITE-SP-08[1'L _ I

O TE-SP-14

= 818 mm

203 mm*

1603 mm

203 mm 2394 mm

203 mm

203 mm

203 mm

387 mm

i

/TF-P--I *,

El. 894 mm(w.r.t. RPV bottom)

Tag Name Azimuthal Angle Tag Name Azimuthal AngleTE-SP-01 151 TE-SP-10 91TE-SP-02 151 TE-SP-11 -TE-SP-03 151 TE-SP-12 191TE-SP-04 151 TE-SP-13 316TE-SP-05 91 TE-SP-14 76TE-SP-06 91 CQ-SP-01 191TE-SP-07 91 CQ-SP-02 106TE-SP-08 91 TQ-SP-01 191TE-SP-09 91 TQ-SP-02 106

Figure B.8 Wetwell Thermocouple and Heat Flux Sensor Locations

26/37

Page 27: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

DIMENSIONS IN mmALL VALVES 1.5"PIPE SCHEDULE IS 40INSULATION - FIBERGLASS

2.25" THICK

EL 6321

457

EL 5864 \45N

EL 5639

597

TE-PCA-1 3 - - 902

ORIFICE PLATE -- 1283 V-PCVA-01

ID =22.86 MM - - 1369

WETWELL

Figure B.9 PCCS Vent PC-VA Line from the PCCS Pool to Wetwell

27/37

Page 28: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

PccsDIMENSIONS IN mm

CONDENSER ALL VALVES 1.5"PIPE SCHEDULE IS 40INSULATION - FIBERGLASS

EL 6321 2.25" THICK

457

EL 5864 L I

0- EL 5757

TE-PCB-13 978

1 372 v-PCVB-O1ORIFICE PLATE - - 1458

WETWELL

Figure B. IO PCCS Vent PC-VB Line from the PCCS Pool to Wetwell

28/37

Page 29: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

pccsDIMENSIONS IN mmALL VALVES 1.5"PIPE SCHEDULE IS 40INSULATION - FIBERGLASS

2.25" THICK

EL 6321

457 90

90- 90-

TE-PCC-1 3--

ORIFICE PLATE " 4

0 EL 5864

1092

1 486 v-Pcvc-ol

1572

1737

WETWELL

Figure B. 1 1 PCCS Vent PC-VC Line from the PCCS Pool to Wetwell

29/37

Page 30: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

DIMENSIONS IN mmALL VALVES 1.5"PIPE SCHEDULE IS 40

0 INSULATION - FIBERGLASS2.25" THICK

EL 6658- 9o O R IFORIFICE PLATE

EL 7537 tPCICS?

Figure B. 12 PCCS Supply A Line from Drywell to the PCCS Pool

30/37

Page 31: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

EL

DIMENSIONS IN mmALL VALVES 1.5"PIPE SCHEDULE IS 40

0 INSULATION - FIBERGLASS2.25' THICK

6658 - 1>ORIFICE PLATE- -- I

PCCSCON DEN SER

Figure B. 13 PCCS Supply B Line from Drywell to the PCCS Pool

31/37

Page 32: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

DIMENSIONS IN mmALL VALVES 1.5"PIPE SCHEDULE IS 40INSULATION - FIBERGLASS

2.25" THICK0

EL 7 5 3 7 -i

VM-PCSC-04EL 6658

PCCSCON DEN SER

Figure B.14 PCCS Supply C Line from Drywell to the PCCS Pool

32/37

Page 33: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

DIMENSIONS IN mmALL VALVES 1"INSULATION - FIBERGLASS

0.5" TUBE - 1.25" THICK1" TUBE - 1" THICK

1" TUBING O.D. = 1.0"I.D. = 0.86"

0.5" TUBING O.D. = 0.5'I.D. = 0.375"

PccsCONDENSER

cn

L6321

EL 6203

Figure B.15 1" PC-CA from PCCS Condenser to PCCS Drain Tank

Page 34: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

1.

DIMENSIONS IN mmALL VALVES 1"INSULATION - FIBERGLASS

0.5" TUBE - 1.25" THICK1" TUBE - 1" THICK

1" TUBING O.D. = 1.0"I.D. = 0.86"

0.5" TUBING O.D. = 0.5"I.D. = 0.375"

co4~-

6321

EL 6203

Figure B.16 1" PC-CB from PCCS Condenser to PCCS Drain Tank

Page 35: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

DIMENSIONS IN mmALL VALVES 1"INSULATION - FIBERGLASS

0.5 TUBE - 1.25" THICK1" TUBE - 1" THICK

1" TUBING O.D. = 1.0"I.D. = 0.86"

0.5" TUBING O.D. = 0.5"I.D. = 0.375"

PLCCSCONDENSER

EL 6321TE-PCC-14

v-Pccc-ol

EL

Figure B.17 1" PC-CC from PCCS Condenser to PCCS Drain Tank.

Page 36: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

4

TOP VIEW OF PCCS CONDENSERS TANK

- 306.25 mm (RADIUS)CONDENSER MODULESCENTER LINES DISTANCEFROM TANK CENTER

WATER HEATER- POWER = 30 kW

(50.8 mm FROM BOTTOM OF TANK)

PARTITION WALLHEIGHT = 1162.5 mm

Ir. 1225 mm 0I

OVERFLOW LINE(50.8 mm)

1 I mm

110l mm

. NORMAL WATER LEVEL

(920mm)

WATER LEVEL FOR WATERINVENTORY EFFECT TEST(630mm)

73.75 mmOPENING AT BOTTOMPARTITION BETWEEN THREEPOOLS (130 mm RADIUS)(130 mm HEIGHT)

WATER FEED & DRAINLINE (25.4 mm)

FRONT VIEW OF PCCS CONDENSERS TANK

Figure B.18 Design of PUMA PCCS Pools

36/37

Page 37: QA of the Puma PCCS Separate - Effect Test Data in 2005 · As a PUMA QA procedure, the correspondence of the channel numbers between the DAS connection of instrumentation and the

37/37


Recommended