Date post: | 14-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | leslie-wells |
View: | 213 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Conduct of the peer review
* Commitment
* Contribution to a smooth and effective process
* The Developmental Engagement Report
Commitment for the review process
TimeEffort Mission
Activities* criteria * protocols
Show courtesy
Confidentiality
Comments
Judgment
* Establishing a sound evidence base
*Agreeing Priorities
* Keeping to schedule but also flexible
Contributing to a smooth and effective Developmental
Engagement
Building on the evidence base
* FAR
* Initial commentaries
* Identify gaps and requests
* Observations and meetings
* Formative judgments
Cont. Contributing to a smooth and effective…
Observing Questioning
Listening
The reviewer tools
Cont. Contributing to a smooth and effective Developmental Engagement
Relation to the facilitator
Daily
Academic staff
Final oral feedback
- Students
- Stakeholders
- Final meeting of review team
Meeting attendance
But, he will not attend
Cont. Contributing to a smooth and effective Developmental Engagement
Significance of meeting attendance
Understanding of line of
enquiries
Matters
context of the
institutions activities
Clarification on
matters addressed
in or omitted
Relation to the facilitator
Cont. Contributing to a smooth and effective Developmental Engagement
Feedback on the initial commentaries
* FAR & any supple. information
* Record apparent (+) & (-) and further enquiry (?)
* Identify of gaps, apparent inconsistencies and
requests
* Sharing of information & request
* Activities during site visit
* Formative judgment each day
* Use the handbook
The Developmental Engagement Report
Structure (annex Q)
Essential qualities of the report
Skills of effective reporting
Production of the report
Essential Qualities of a reportReport Should be
Evaluative
Judgment
orrectlearonciseC
All the team
Fair Balanced
Compliant
Annex Q
The Structure of the Reportreference Part 4 paragraphs 55-56 and
annex Q
Preface Executive SummaryMain text comprising Introduction Evaluation Conclusions
Conclude that the [institution] Either [is ready to receive an accreditation visit] Or [is not yet ready to receive an accreditation visit.]
The strength include: Matters that should be addressed before an
accreditation visit are:
The skills of effective reporting
Notes
UseAnnexes I & Q
Formative judgment
Test & verify Evidenc
e
Discussions
Team
Cont. The skills of effective reporting
Trivial details Drafts
Comments & suggestions
Over defensive
Evaluative frame work
Production of the report
Sharing formative judgments & draft paragraphs in the team
Reference part 4 paragraph 53-56 and annex Q
Decision-making in the team
Making judgments + & --
Conclusion either / or
Prepare oral feedback script (annex J)
Cont. Production of the reportReference part 4 paragraph 53-56 and
annex Q
Polishing written reportEditing stage
(ref. para. 56) Send draft 3
Institution Send draft 4
NQAAC
Completion in 20w with milestones
After the site visit
Completion in 20w with milestones
o Week 1-2: Draft 1 (chair) from written
contributions provided by peer reviewers
during the site-visit & report-writing meeting
o Week 3-4: (reviewers in the team) respond with
written comments & suggestions based on
record of DE
o Week 4: Draft 2 (chair) Send to QAAP
forward to independent editor
suggestions will be made to chair
Completion in 20w with milestones
o Week 6: Draft 3 sent to QAAP
checked & sent to the institution with a
covering letter inviting it to comment matters
of factual accuracy Institution should
respond within 2 weeks to QAAP
o Week 8: Draft 3 returned by institution to
QAAP
o QAAP will seek views of review chair in
considering any response
Completion in 20w with milestones
o Week 12: Draft 4 QAAP may engage a professional
editor to ensure its consistence with its policy
o Week 20: Final draft 5 will be translated 0n A&E &
QAAP will make it available to institution, reviewer chair &
peer reviewers
o Report is not published & remain confidential within the
institution, its university, QAAP & Peer review team
How to deal with the staff members?
Self esteem ( ( احترامConstructiveالذات
Job related
Arguments (( ،حجةبرهان،مناقشةProvide evidence
Credible judgment
o Testing the developing systems and
processes
o Dialogue with peers
o Receiving external structured comments
o Agenda for further improvement
o Work with the spirit of a team work.
o Have a consensuses .
o We are not inspectors .
o We help the Faculty to have successful DE
phase that will end in accreditation.
o Respect the Faculty’s pride.
o Do not suggest any solutions for the Faculty.
o Communicate through the e-mail properly.
o Be sure about your conclusions and have an
evidence for each.
o Be sure that the report is correct, clear, fair, and
balanced.
o Editing.
o Be ready to do the correction needed to release
the second , third and final report.