HKCA 3104
ISSUE 3
JUNE 2017
QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL FOR BILLING
AND METERING INTEGRITY SCHEME
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE i JUNE 2017
FOREWORD
1. On 30 May 2000, the former Telecommunications Authority (now the
Communications Authority, hereinafter collectively referred to as the “CA”) issued a
Consultation Paper on “Billing and Metering Accuracy of Public Telecommunications
Services in Hong Kong” proposing to implement a scheme that would best suit the need
of customers and the industry and at the same time be economically and technically
feasible for implementation in Hong Kong’s environment.
2. Having considered the submissions from the industry on the above Consultation
Paper, the CA issued a Statement on 4 August 2000 to set out its considered views and
intention that there is a genuine need to introduce and implement such a scheme in Hong
Kong for enhancement of the confidence of the customers on billing and metering
accuracy of the industry. In order to ensure early implementation of the proposed scheme,
an industry forum was set up with participation of representatives from the
telecommunications operators and their associations, the Consumer Council and the user
groups concerned to devise the details of the proposed scheme called “Billing and
Metering Integrity Scheme” (“BMIS”) which includes the billing and metering integrity
standards, self-appraisal system, assurance system, reporting system, monitoring system
and implementation plan.
3. This Quality Assurance Manual (“QAM”) has been developed to specify the
required metering and billing integrity standards as well as the self-appraisal
requirements and procedures to be followed and complied with by the industry. Another
document called HKCA 3105, “Requirements on the Assurance, Reporting and
Monitoring Procedures for the Billing and Metering Integrity Scheme” listing the
general requirements and procedures on the assurance, reporting and monitoring has
also been developed in order that the industry could follow and observe these
requirements and procedures closely in compliance with BMIS.
4. All the HKCA specifications, consultation papers, statements and information
notes issued by the CA related to the BMIS can be obtained by downloading them from
the website of the Office of the Communications Authority (“OFCA”) at
http://www.ofca.gov.hk.
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE ii JUNE 2017
5. Any enquiry or request for further information regarding this manual can be
addressed to –
Senior Regulatory Affairs Manager (Regulatory Section 11)
Office of the Communications Authority
29/F, Wu Chung House,
213 Queen’s Road East,
Wanchai, Hong Kong.
Fax: +852 2803 5112
Email: [email protected]
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE iii JUNE 2017
AMENDMENT TABLE
Item Issue No. Paragraph Descriptions
1 2 Foreword Update the contact point. 2 2 9.1.1 The interval of submission of
self-declaration forms is revised from “quarterly” to “half-yearly”.
3 2 9.2.1 Ditto 4 2 9.2.4 Ditto 5 2 9.2.5 Ditto 6 2 Section 10 Update the reference documents 7 3 Whole
document (i) Editorial amendments and changes to rename OFTA to OFCA; (ii) update OFCA’s contact information.
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE iv JUNE 2017
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1. Introduction 1
2. Glossary 2
3. Scope of the Manual 3
4. Billing and Metering Integrity Standards 3
5. Telecommunications Acceptance Models 4
5.1 Telecommunications Metering Acceptance Model 4
5.2 Telecommunications Billing Acceptance Model 7
6. Testing Tolerance Levels 10
6.1 Metering Tolerance 10
6.2 Billing Tolerance 10
6.3 Rounding Treatments 11
7. Verification of Metering and Billing System 13
7.1 Metering Test 13
7.2 Billing Test 23
7.3 Pre-paid Services 25
8. Guidelines to Design Operator’s Detailed Operation Manual 32
8.1 Introduction 32
8.2 Details of Each Section 33
9. Monthly Test Report 37
9.1 Introduction 37
9.2 Self-Declaration Procedures 37
9.3 Format of Test Report 38
10. Reference Documents 43
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE v JUNE 2017
Annex 1 Switching Rules and Procedures 44
Annex 2 Self-Declaration Form for Compliance Status 45
Annex 3 Self-Declaration Form for the Metering Test 46
Annex 4 Self-Declaration Form for the Billing Test 47
Annex 5 Format of Metering and Billing Test Report 48
Annex 6 Inspection Status 56
Annex 7 Format of Test Report for Rounding Treatment Test 57
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 1 JUNE 2017
1. Introduction
1.1 The main purpose of this QAM is to provide a quality assurance framework such
that the operators can implement their self-appraisal systems in a timely and responsive
manner in compliance with the BMIS. It is anticipated that this manual would also
facilitate the understanding of the general public on what controls and measures are to
be implemented by operators to assure the accuracy and integrity of their bills issued to
customers.
1.2 This manual is published, distributed and maintained by OFCA. Apart from this
manual, the operators are required to develop their own Detailed Operation Manual
(“DOM”) and perform measurements or generate Test Calls in accordance with the
requirements and procedures stipulated in this manual.
1.3 If necessary, OFCA or its appointed agent will perform an on-site audit on
operators’ Billing and Metering Systems.
1.4 Operators are encouraged to implement ISO 9001:2000 “Quality Management
Systems - Requirements” in their Billing and Metering Systems so that a
well-established process control mechanism can be developed. However, the
compliance with or adoption of this ISO requirement by operators is voluntary and up
to operators’ individual commercial decision and operational requirements. If
necessary, OFCA may conduct a review and consultation with operators on whether
there is a genuine need for operators to strengthen the process control of billing and
metering systems by generally adopting this and/or other related ISO requirements.
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 2 JUNE 2017
2. Glossary
Acceptance Number The number that is used for determining monthly test acceptability,
i.e. the number of failed samples allowable in a test.
Acceptance Quality Limit (“AQL”)
Quality level that is the worst tolerable process average when a continuing series of lots is submitted for acceptance sampling. In BMIS, AQL refers to the quality level to show the likely percentage of failed items in a monthly Metering/Billing Test.
Billing Billing means the function of public telecommunications operators or service providers in – - assembling the charges incurred by a customer during the billing
period; - applying any debts or credits outstanding or discounts due and
calculating the net amount to be paid by the customer; and - issuing the bill.
Billing Tolerance The maximum deviation allowed in each call charge of Billing Test.
Call Detail Records (“CDR”)
Records of detailed information such as call type, call start time, call duration, calling party, called party etc. captured by the switches.
Call Duration The interval between the call is actually established, i.e. the interval that begins when the call is answered and ends when the call is terminated.
Called Party A called party is the person who receives the call.
Calling Party A calling party is the person who originates the call.
Certified Public Accountant (“CPA”)
Certified Public Accountant means a professional accountant registered as such by virtue of section 22 of the Professional Accountants Ordinance (Chapter 50) and holding a valid and current practising certificate.
Charged Party A charged party is the person registered with the telecommunications
operator or service provider concerned responsible for the payment or settlement of a specific or group of bills.
Charging Time Stamp
Charging time stamp is the time recorded in a CDR used for calculating the charge amount for the services provided or consumed and the applicable tariff thereto.
Delay The time required for a signal to transit from the sending point to the receiving metering point.
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 3 JUNE 2017
Metering
The process of capturing and recording call details such as calling number, time of day, call duration etc. for billing purpose.
Metering Tolerance The maximum deviation allowed for call duration in the Metering Test.
Per Call Test A two-part Metering Test: Part 1 to reconcile Test Call log records with call details from a metering point and Part 2 to reconcile call details from that metering point with call details from Billing System.
Switching Rules A set of rules to control the switching of status between Normal, Reduced, Tightened and Discontinue Inspection.
Test Call A call generated manually or automatically to verify the functioning and accuracy of a Metering System.
3. Scope of the Manual
This manual describes the billing and metering integrity standards, the sampling
models, metering / billing tolerance levels, the verification procedures and the format of
the test report as required by the BMIS. It also provides guidance for operators to
design their own DOM.
4. Billing and Metering Integrity Standards
The billing and metering integrity standards of public telecommunications services are
described as below –
Metering Integrity Standard
Number of inaccurately metered calls shall not exceed 1 in 10 000 of total calls.
Billing Integrity Standard
Absolute summation error value of the inaccurately billed calls in a bill shall not
exceed 1 in 10 000 of the value of total billed sum in that bill.
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 4 JUNE 2017
5. Telecommunications Acceptance Models
5.1 Telecommunications Metering Acceptance Model (the “Metering Model”)
Introduction
5.1.1 The sampling model for Metering System is developed in accordance with
ISO 2859-1:1999(E) “Sampling Procedures for Inspection by Attributes – Part 1:
Sampling Schemes Indexed by Acceptance Quality Limit (AQL) for Lot-by-Lot
Inspection” on the condition that live traffic should be used in the first place. AQL is a
quality level to show the likely percentage of failed items in a monthly Metering Test.
This manual has made use of the same or similar terms given in the abovementioned
ISO document. If there were practical and technical limitations such that live traffic
could not be used, operators could use Test Calls that should be conducted in the same
environment and conditions of live traffic within the networks of the operators
concerned.
5.1.2 The purpose of the monthly Metering Test is to examine whether the metering
integrity standard of 1:10 000 given in Section 4 is met and to ensure an acceptable
quality level in metering accuracy for a specific traffic in a month. Operators shall start
from the normal inspection. Normal, tightened or reduced inspection shall continue to
be unchanged on successive monthly Metering Tests, except where the Switching Rules
require changes. The Switching Rules shall be applied to each class of
non-conformities or nonconforming units independently.
Number of Test Calls for Metering Test
5.1.3 The Metering Model governs the acceptance criteria and the amount of Test
Calls to be conducted by fixed network operators (“FNOs”), mobile network operators
(“MNOs”), services-based operators (“SBOs”) including mobile virtual network
operators and those SBOs authorised under their respective licences to provide External
Telecommunications Services (“ETS”), International Value-Added Network Services
and Internet Access Services (“IAS”), etc. The Metering Model follows some of the
requirements in ISO 2859-1:1999(E) with the details given in the following table –
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 5 JUNE 2017
Number of Test Calls Per Month Per Licence (Note 1) Reduced
Inspection Normal
Inspection Tightened Inspection
Acceptance No. / Rejection No.
AQL
500 1 250 2 000 0, 1 0.01%
Table 1: Metering Model
Note 1: Each MNO is required to conduct a number of Test Calls stated in Table 1
irrespective of the number of licences issued to that particular operator for operation of
mobile services.
Switching Rules
5.1.4 The diagram showing details of the Switching Rules is attached in Annex 1.
Normal to Tightened
5.1.5 Under the normal inspection, operators are required to sample or generate a
specific number of live or Test Calls every month in accordance with the requirements
in Table 1. When two monthly Metering Tests out of five consecutive monthly
Metering Tests (or fewer than five consecutive monthly Metering Tests) have been
non-acceptable on original inspection, operators are required to implement the
requirements of the tightened inspection.
Tightened to Normal
5.1.6 Under the tightened inspection, operators are required to sample or generate a
specific number of live or Test Calls every month in accordance with the requirements
in Table 1. When there are five consecutive monthly Metering Tests that have been
considered acceptable on original inspection, operators are allowed to switch to the
normal inspection.
Normal to Reduced
5.1.7 Under the normal inspection, operators are required to sample or generate a
specific number of live or Test Calls every month in accordance with the requirements
in Table 1. Operators can switch to the reduced inspection provided that all of the
following conditions are satisfied –
a) the current value of the switching score (see Section 5.1.8) is at least 30; and
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 6 JUNE 2017
b) reduced inspection is considered desirable by the operator.
Remark: the ISO 2859-1’s criterion of “production is at a steady rate” is not applied to
the Metering Model when switching from the normal inspection to the reduced
inspection.
Switching Score
5.1.8 The calculation of the switching score shall be initiated at the start of normal
inspection. The switching score shall be set at the zero value at the start and updated
following the inspection of each subsequent monthly Metering Test on original normal
inspection. When the acceptance number is 0, add 2 to the switching score if a specific
monthly Metering Test is accepted; otherwise reset the switching score to zero. For
example, the switching score is 2 when the monthly Metering Test in, say, May 2013 is
passed. The switching score is 4 when monthly Metering Tests in May 2013 and June
2013 are passed. The switching score is reset to zero if the monthly Metering Test in
July 2013 failed.
Reduced to Normal
5.1.9 Under the reduced inspection, operators can switch to the normal inspection if
any of the following conditions occur on original inspection –
a) a monthly Metering Test is not accepted; or
b) instructions given by OFCA that normal inspection shall be re-instated.
Remark: ISO 2859-1’s criterion of “production becomes irregular or delayed” is not
applied to the Metering Model when switching from the reduced inspection to the
normal inspection.
Discontinuation of Inspection
5.1.10 If the cumulative number of monthly Metering Tests not accepted in a sequence
of consecutive monthly Metering Tests on original tightened inspection reaches 5, the
acceptance procedures from Section 5.1.4 to Section 5.1.9 shall not be resumed until
the operator concerned has already improved its quality assurance system in a manner
to the satisfaction of the OFCA. Tightened inspection shall then be used as if Section
5.1.5 had been invoked.
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 7 JUNE 2017
5.2 Telecommunications Billing Acceptance Model (the “Billing Model”)
5.2.1 The Billing Model is also based on ISO 2859-1:1999(E). Operators are required
to perform a Billing Test each month by sampling a number of bills specified with
respect to the applicable status in Table 2 below. The purpose of the monthly Billing
Test is to examine whether the billing integrity standard of 1:10 000 given in Section 4
is met and to ensure an acceptable quality level of billing accuracy for the bills issued in
a month.
Number of Bills to be Sampled Each Month
Acceptance No. /
Rejection No. AQL
Sample 32 bills in the reduced inspection Sample 50 bills in the normal inspection Sample 80 bills in the tightened inspection
0, 1 0.25%
Table 2: Billing Model
5.2.2 A specific monthly Billing Test is considered to be not acceptable if the
individual total error sum over the total billed sum of any sampled bill is greater than
1/10 000.
Normal to Tightened
5.2.3 The Switching Rules as specified in Annex 1 are also applicable to the Billing
Model. Under the normal inspection, operators are required to sample a specific
number of bills every month in accordance with the requirements in Table 2. When two
monthly Billing Tests out of five consecutive monthly Billing Tests (or fewer than five
consecutive monthly Billing Tests) have been non-acceptable on original inspection,
operators are required to implement the requirements of the tightened inspection.
Tightened to Normal
5.2.4 Under the tightened inspection, operators are required to sample a specific
number of bills every month in accordance with the requirements in Table 2. When
there are five consecutive monthly Billing Tests that have been considered acceptable
on original inspection, operators are allowed to switch to the normal inspection.
Normal to Reduced
5.2.5 Under the normal inspection, operators are required to sample a specific number
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 8 JUNE 2017
of bills every month in accordance with the requirements in Table 2. Operators can
switch to the reduced inspection provided that all of the following conditions are
satisfied –
a) the current value of the switching score (see Section 5.2.6) is at least 30; and
b) reduced inspection is considered desirable by the operator.
Remark: the ISO 2859-1’s criterion of “production is at a steady rate” is not applied to
the Billing Model when switching from the normal inspection to the reduced
inspection.
Switching Score
5.2.6 The calculation of the switching score shall be initiated at the start of the normal
inspection. The switching score shall be set at the zero value at the start and updated
following the inspection of each subsequent monthly Billing Test on original normal
inspection. When the acceptance number is 0, add 2 to the switching score if a specific
monthly Billing Test is accepted; otherwise reset the switching score to zero. For
example, the switching score is 2 when the monthly Billing Test in, say, May 2013 is
passed. The switching score is 4 when monthly Billing Tests in May 2013 and June
2013 also passed. The switching score is reset to zero if the monthly Billing Test in July
2013 failed.
Reduced to Normal
5.2.7 Under the reduced inspection, operators can switch to the normal inspection if
any of the following conditions occur on original inspection –
a) a monthly Billing Test is not accepted; or
b) instructions given by OFCA that normal inspection shall be re-instated.
Remark: the ISO 2859-1’s criterion of “production becomes irregular or delayed” is not
applied to the Billing Model when switching from the reduced inspection to the normal
inspection.
Discontinuation of Inspection
5.2.8 If the cumulative number of monthly Billing Tests not accepted in a sequence of
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 9 JUNE 2017
consecutive monthly Billing Tests on original tightened inspection reaches 5, the
acceptance procedures from Section 5.2.3 to Section 5.2.7 shall not be resumed until
the operator concerned has improved its quality assurance system in a manner to the
satisfaction of the OFCA. Tightened inspection shall then be used as if Section 5.2.3
had been invoked.
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 10 JUNE 2017
6. Testing Tolerance Levels
6.1 Metering Tolerance
6.1.1 Since the metering device of a network is usually not located at the customer end,
the measured duration will have a small difference from that perceived by the customer.
Therefore, it is necessary to introduce a term known as Metering Tolerance. Delay is
the main cause of the Metering Tolerance.
6.1.2 The following are the Metering Tolerance for different services –
Type of Services Tolerance
IDD on Fixed Network Service
Mobile Service (Note 2)
Mobile Pre-paid Service
ETS
ETS Calling Card Service
Fixed Network Calling Card Service
Modem Dial-up Internet Service/IVANS
+/- 5100 ms
+/- 6980 ms
+/- 7640 ms
+/- 4200 ms
+ 7150 ms
+ 6550 ms
+ 54.5 seconds
Table 6.1 Metering Tolerance for Different Services
Note 2: Mobile Service is applicable to mobile local calls, mobile IDD calls and mobile
ETS calls.
6.1.3 Apart from Metering Tolerance for call duration, four more parameters need to
be tested in the Metering Test. These parameters are Calling Party, Called Party,
Charged Party and Charging Time Stamp.
6.1.4 No tolerance or error is allowed for recording of the Calling Party, the Called
Party and the Charged Party. These parameters must be checked if they are relevant to
the charging accuracy. Tolerance for the charging time stamp is +8.5 seconds and -5.5
seconds and this parameter needs to be checked if it is relevant to the charging accuracy.
6.2 Billing Tolerance
6.2.1 During the Billing Test, call records from Billing System would be rerated by
operators in accordance with the billing logic/tariff plan. This rerated per call charge
will be compared with the per call charge appeared on the bill issued to the customer.
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 11 JUNE 2017
No tolerance will be given to the difference between the rerated per call charge and also
the per call charge appeared on the bill issued to the customer. In other words, the
billing tolerance of each billed call for different type of services is –
IDD Service : +/- 0 cent
Mobile Service : +/- 0 cent
Modem Dial-up Internet Service : +/- 0 cent
6.3 Rounding Treatments
6.3.1 All operators concerned are requested to declare their rounding treatments used
in DOM and perform a rounding treatment test on all sampled bills in the Billing Test
in the first twelve months after the implementation of the BMIS and report in the
manner specified herein. OFCA will conduct a review of whether there is a need to
impose suitable accuracy requirements, integrity standards or restrictions on the
rounding treatments or steps of individual operators, if necessary.
6.3.2 The per call charge appearing in a bill will be subtracted from the actual per call
charge calculated by using 4 decimal places in dollar value at each rating or mediation
step. This difference is known as per call discrepancy (“Eij”). All E ij will be summed
up and reported to OFCA.
Eij = ABij - A’Bij
where i refers to i-th bill and j refers to j-th call of the i-th bill
Eij refers to per call discrepancy
ABij refers to operator billed per call charge, calculated from operator’s billing
logic (usually with 2 decimal places in dollar value)
A’Bij refers to actual per call charge (with 4 decimal places in dollar value)
6.3.3 When Eij is positive, it implies that it is to the benefits of the operator. When Eij
is negative, it implies that it is to the benefits of the consumer. Operators shall specify
the signs of Eij clearly in the results. For example, a telephone per call discrepancy is
Eij = ABij - A’Bij = $0.01 - $0.0074
= + $0.0026
6.3.4 Operators shall submit the results of the rounding treatment test to OFCA in both
hardcopy and softcopy not later than 14 months and two weeks after the
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 12 JUNE 2017
implementation of the BMIS. The submitted test results would be studied by OFCA.
The results of this rounding treatment test should be duly signed by the operator’s
responsible person, dated and chopped with the company chop. Operator’s
submissions of the test results should use the format/template given in Annex 7.
6.3.5 All submissions of hard copies of the rounding treatment test reports shall be
addressed to –
Senior Regulatory Affairs Manager (Regulatory Section 11)
Office of the Communications Authority
29/F, Wu Chung House,
213 Queen’s Road East,
Wanchai, Hong Kong.
6.3.6 At the same time, submissions of soft copies of the rounding treatment test
reports shall be addressed to –
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 13 JUNE 2017
7. Verification of Metering and Billing System
7.1 Metering Test
7.1.1 Operators are allowed to use automatic call generators to generate Test Calls
from switches to test the metering accuracy. This section describes the two methods to
perform the Metering Test. The operator may reconcile test log records from call
generators with the corresponding records in the Billing System. The alternative
method is to reconcile test log records from call generators with the records extracted
from a metering point, followed by another reconcilation with the metering point and
the corresponding records in the Billing System. In such case, the operator has to
specify the metering point, say at the mediation device, in the DOM.
7.1.2 Nevertheless, manual Test Calls such as calling card services are acceptable if
there is no appropriate test equipment for the operator. In this case, the operator may
also reconcile manual test log records with the corresponding records in the Billing
System.
Methodology to Verify Metering System Using Test Calls
The Metering Test
7.1.3 The Metering Test is performed once every month and outlined in the diagram
below –
7.1.4 The test should involve the following steps –
i) Generation of Test Calls;
ii) Collection of Test Call log;
iii) Collection of call details from the Billing System; and
iv) Producing test result by comparing the Test Call log from call generator with
the call details from the Billing System. Test Calls are accepted or rejected in
Test
Calls
Metering
Point
Billing
System
Bills
Comparison
Test Call
Log Call Details
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 14 JUNE 2017
accordance with the tolerance levels described in Section 6.1.
Number of Test Calls and Acceptance Level
7.1.5 The number of Test Calls required in each test and the acceptance level are
specified in Table 1. The distribution of numbers of Test Calls stated in Table 1 will be
determined by applying traffic ratio, revenue or number of customers of the operators
concerned. In general, the operators must use the same consistent basis of traffic ratio,
revenue or number of customers in all pro-rata calculations for the numbers of Test
Calls and Test Bills among relevant pre-paid and post-paid services, and the use of
pro-rata basis must be declared in DOM.
Test Call Pattern
7.1.6 In each Metering Test, operators should change test patterns quarterly in order to
satisfy the randomness requirements on calling Directory Numbers (“DNs”), called
DNs, charging DNs and call types.
Directory Numbers Selection
7.1.7 The operators should reserve a certain DNs for the Metering Test. These DNs
can be discrete spare numbers or belong to a specific number block. Operators can even
use the internal network routing and testing numbers (i.e. numbers with the leading
digits of “19”) at their own convenience.
7.1.8 The operators have to use a pseudo random/ballot method to draw a calling DN
and a called DN for the Metering Test. However, the calling DN and the called DN
must be changed periodically so as to satisfy the randomness requirement. In case of
dial-up Internet service, the operators have to use a pseudo-random/ballot method to
draw two log-in ID numbers from the reserved number list. Eight access numbers
should be randomly selected from the available access number pool. If the pool has less
than eight access numbers, all the access numbers in the pool should be tested. In case
of calling card calls, operators can select two cards from a reserved pool of 100 cards.
Test Call Types
7.1.9 The Test Call types are shown in the configuration diagrams at the end of this
section. During the IDD service test for ETS, mobile and fixed network services,
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 15 JUNE 2017
operators are allowed to set up a loop back route to simulate the international call path.
Operators may determine their own numbering scheme for performing this loop back
test according to their operational needs.
7.1.10 Regarding the indirect calls involved in fixed and mobile networks, there may
be technical difficulties in setting up a test configuration across networks for indirect
calls. Therefore, operators are allowed not to test indirect calls provided that they have
tested the direct calls and could explicitly state and confirm that the call paths of
indirect calls are having no significant difference to those of direct calls.
Call Duration
7.1.11 The call duration to be used in the Metering Test is –
Call Type Test Call Duration
(Minutes) IDD Calls 1.5
Mobile Calls 1.5 Dial-up Internet Calls 10
Tolerance of Measurement Equipment
7.1.12 Operators may either use measurement equipment produced by equipment
manufacturers in the market or tailor-made ones for their own use. However, they need
to enclose the relevant certificate(s) by the equipment manufacturers or recognised
laboratories or self-declaration on the accuracy/tolerance of such measurement
equipment in use in the DOM in order that these certificates and self-declaration
information will be audited by OFCA on a need basis. The tolerance for measurement
equipment is +/- 1 second. Maximum tolerance for measurement equipment for call
duration is +/- 1 second. In case of manual call, the tolerance of manual calls is the same
as Section 7.3.6.
7.1.13 The total tolerance for accepting the Test Calls is the tolerance of measurement
equipment plus the Metering Tolerance mentioned in Section 6.1.
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 16 JUNE 2017
Requirements on Test Execution
7.1.14 Operators should follow the following requirements during the test execution –
i) Operators need to check the integrity of the time stamps of the calls if the
call types of those calls selected are in time zone tariff plans. Operators
should ensure to continually align and adjust the time stamp of the Test Call
logs recorded by the call generators/receivers with the clock reference of
the Hong Kong Observatory (time server “stdtime.gov.hk”);
ii) Operators should produce test reports and self-declaration forms according
to the requirements described in Section 9 of this manual;
iii) Metering Tolerances for these three parameters, i.e. start time, end time and
call duration, strictly follow Section 6.1 regardless of whether the
parameters are directly obtained or indirectly derived from other
parameters on the call record in the Billing System;
iv) Total number of successful calls to be counted shall be no less than 99.9%
of total Test Calls as specified in Table 1; and
v) Operators may test more than the number of calls as specified in Table 1,
but they shall use the valid calls (i.e. successful calls and those unsuccessful
calls as specified in (iv) in sequence for checking and reporting purpose).
Alternative Method by Per Call Test
7.1.15 Operators have an option to perform the Metering Test in two steps according to
their operational needs. However, the Metering Test is considered to have failed if
either Part 1 test or Part 2 test failed. The details of Part 1 and Part 2 tests are described
in Sections 7.1.16 and 7.1.18 respectively. Both tests are performed once every month.
Part 1 Test
7.1.16 The following diagram illustrates Part 1 of the test.
Test Calls Metering
Point
Billing
System
Bills
Test Call
Log
Comparison
Call Detailed Records
Part 1
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 17 JUNE 2017
7.1.17 This part is the same as that described in the “Methodology to Verify Metering
System Using Test Calls” of this section, except that the call details for comparison
with the Test Call log are collected from the metering point output instead of the Billing
System. The requirements specified in Section 7.1.3 “The Metering Test” to Section
7.1.14 “Requirements on Test Execution” are applicable to this part of the test.
Part 2 Test
Test Outline
7.1.18 The objective of the test is to compare the call information of the CDR at the
metering point output with the call details from the Billing System. Live calls are taken
as samples for comparison. The details of the Part 2 test are illustrated in the following
diagram.
7.1.19 The test should involve the following steps –
i) Collection of CDR samples of live calls from metering point output on
random basis;
ii) Collection of call details from the Billing System; and
iii) Producing test result by comparing the CDRs from the metering point and
call details from the Billing System. Test Calls are accepted if the
parameters set out in Section 6.1 are exactly matched.
Number of Test Calls and Acceptance Number
7.1.20 The number of Test Calls required in each test and the acceptance level are
specified in Table 1.
Live
Calls
Metering
Point Billing
System Bills
CDR Comparison
Call Details
Part 2
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 18 JUNE 2017
Call Sampling
7.1.21 The calls are sampled according to a random selection of a calling number
during a randomly selected period in the month when the Part 1 test is taken place.
7.1.22 Metering Test is not required for incoming toll free call, collect call and global
conference call, etc. if the Metering Systems are operated by other carriers or manually.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 19 JUNE 2017
Test Configurations (1/4)
CallGenerator
CDR
LocalSwitch
TollSwitch
BillingSystem
Fixed Network IDD Service
FixedNetwork
loopback
CallReceiver
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 20 JUNE 2017
Test Configurations (2/4)
CallGenerator
Base Station
Controller
BaseStation
Mobile Network
MobileNetwork
MSC
Base Station
Controller
BaseStation
Call Receiver
loopback(for IDD test only)
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 21 JUNE 2017
Test Configurations (3/4)
CallGenerator ETS
Platformloopback
ETS
CallReceiver
ETS platform with direct interface with CallGenerator and Call Receiver
Option 1
CallGenerator ETS
Platformloopback
CallReceiver
ETS platform cannot directly interface withCall Generator and Call Receiver. Test callsare passed to ETS platform via PSTN
PSTN
Option 2
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 22 JUNE 2017
Test Configurations (3/4)
Option 3 Test Configurations (4/4)
IAS
Call Receiver
Call Generator
Mobile Network ETS Platform
loop back
Call Generator e.g. computer
PSTN IAS Platform
Remote Access Server Radius Server
______________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 23 JUNE 2017
7.2 Billing Test
7.2.1 Based on the sampled bills as mentioned in Section 5.2.1, operators are required to perform a Billing Test on a monthly basis by sampling 32, 50, 80 bills in the reduced, normal and tightened inspection respectively. The purpose of the Billing Test is to verify the billing accuracy of all sampled bills. 7.2.2 Operators will calculate the billing charges of calls by applying their own billing logic and using the call detail records information stored in their Billing Systems (“ABij”) which is exactly the same point of the Billing System used for Metering Test under Section 7.1.4 (iii) or Section 7.1.19 (iii). Afterwards, operators will compare the charges calculated from their billing logic (“ABij”) with the charges actually billed to customers (“A’’Bij”). The absolute differences between these two charges in a bill will be added and regarded as total error in a bill (“Σ Dij”). 7.2.3 The actual bill amount is the summation of all chargeable values that the customer needs to pay to the operator concerned. For convenience purpose, the charge that the customer needs to pay to the operator is regarded as positive value, otherwise it will be regarded as negative value. Examples of negative value are free minutes, free call charges, balance brought forward in credit, odd cents carried forward etc. 7.2.4 Therefore, all the billing charges of positive value in a sampled bill will be added up and regarded as the actual bill amount (“Ti”) in a bill. All other negative values such as monetary rebates, free minutes, volume discount etc. will not be counted in this amount. These billing charges include all timed/usage charges and non-timed/usage charges in that bill. Any billing charge of negative value will be checked arithmetically but will not be counted in the actual bill amount. When operators provide rebates in terms of time to their customers, the input information (time rebated from previous months or free minutes carried forward) can be assumed to be correct. Operators only need to perform the checking on the arithmetic calculation. When a sampled bill consists of negative chargeable values only, this sampled bill will be discarded and substituted by another sampled bill. 7.2.5 The passing criteria of an individual bill i are – ΣDij / Ti <= $1 / $10000 where
� i refers to a bill and j refers to a call;
� Ti refers to the actual bill amount in a bill (down to cents place);
� Dij refers to per call error in a specific bill i and it equals to the absolute
difference between ABij and A’’Bij (Dij = ׀ABij - A’’ Bij׀);
� ABij refers to operator billed per call charge calculated from operator’s billing
logic (down to cents place) ;
� A’’ Bij refers to per call charge appeared on customer’s bill (down to cents
place); and
� Arithmetic check based on charges actually billed to customers is counted as a
______________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 24 JUNE 2017
passing criterion in a bill check.
7.2.6 The monthly Billing Test is considered as failed if any individual sampled bill is
failed. The following table illustrates the number of bills to be sampled by operators
each month and the acceptance/rejection criteria.
Number of Bills to be Sampled Each Month
Acceptance No. / Rejection No.
Sample 32 bills in the reduced inspection Sample 50 bills in the normal inspection Sample 80 bills in the tightened inspection
0,1
7.2.7 However, operators shall ensure a random or pseudo-random selection of samples
and also declare the selection process in the DOM. Operators should use one of the
following parameters which would cover all their customers to randomise the selection
of the samples. Random selection parameters are account number, DN or invoice
number.
7.2.8 Operators can use electronic records of the bills in the Billing System instead of
hardcopy bills, provided that they are consistent with the bills actually issued to
customers. Operators should have measures to ensure the consistency of the two
records. 7.2.9 No Billing Test is required if the values of bills are calculated and checked by the
other carriers. However, it is still necessary for operators to conduct an arithmetic check
of these billing data to verify the correctness of the final bill value. If only raw data
(e.g. call duration) is provided by other carriers, operators are still required to perform
the associated Billing Test based on these raw data.
Maximum Calls Per Bill
7.2.10 “Maximum calls per bill” is a selection criterion in the Billing Test. If the
number of calls of a sampled bill is greater than the maximum calls per bill, then this bill
can be discarded. The maximum calls per bill for the Billing Test is defined as –
IDD Service 35 calls per bill Mobile Service 191 calls per bill Dial-up Internet Service 34 calls per bill
______________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 25 JUNE 2017
Minimum Call Per Bill
7.2.11 The minimum call per bill in Billing Test is defined as 1.
7.3 Pre-paid Services
7.3.1 Pre-paid services refer to the services provided by operators in the form of
pre-paid calling cards and pre-paid SIM cards.
Number of Test Calls
7.3.2 Operators can use traffic ratio, revenue or number of customers to determine the
number of Test Calls (“X”) for the pre-paid services in the Metering Test whereas X is a
portion of Test Calls in Table 1. For example, an FNO is offering both post-paid and
pre-paid services and it decides to use traffic ratio to work out the number of Test Calls
for post-paid and pre-paid services. Assuming that its traffic ratios for post-paid and
pre-paid are 90% and 10% of total traffic respectively, the numbers of Test Calls for
post-paid and pre-paid services are 1 125 (1 250 x 90%) and 125 Test Calls (1 250 x 10%)
respectively.
Number of Pre-paid Cards
7.3.3 Similarly, operators can use traffic ratio, revenue or number of customers to
determine the number of pre-paid calling cards/pre-paid SIM cards (“Y”) for the Billing
Test whereas Y is a portion of bills in Table 2. For example, an FNO is offering both
post-paid and pre-paid services and it decides to use traffic ratio to work out the number
of pre-paid calling cards. Assuming that its traffic ratios for post-paid and pre-paid
services are 90% and 10% of total traffic respectively, the number of bills of post-paid
services for the test is 45 (50 x 90%) and the number of pre-paid calling cards/bills for
the test is 5. In addition, half-adjustment rounding to the nearest integer must be applied
in these pro-rata calculations, except that if the number for a pre-paid service is smaller
than 1, it must be rounded up to 1.
Billing Integrity Standard
7.3.4 As far as the Billing Test is concerned, the absolute summation error value of the
inaccurately billed calls in a pre-paid calling card/pre-paid SIM card shall not exceed 1
in 10 000 of the value of total billed sum in that pre-paid calling card/pre-paid SIM card.
______________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 26 JUNE 2017
Test Method
7.3.5 Automatic test for the pre-paid services is highly recommended and shall be
adopted at a first place. However, if automatic generation of pre-paid calls is not feasible,
then manual generation of Test Calls for pre-paid services is also acceptable.
Tolerance of Call Start Time and Call Stop Time
7.3.6 In case the call generation and call recording have to be undertaken manually, the
tolerance of call start time or call end time is +/- 2 seconds.
Accuracy of Interactive Voice Response System (“IVRS”) Voice Prompt
7.3.7 Operators shall self-declare in DOM that the accuracy of the pre-paid calling card
or pre-paid SIM card system in the conversion of electronic record to voice message.
Scenario of Pre-paid Services Platforms
7.3.8 In general, there are two scenarios for the pre-paid services systems. Scenario 1
refers to the pre-paid services system possessing a database in which the required call
detailed information and the charge of each call have been recorded. Scenario 2 refers to
the pre-paid services systems that do not have a database storing call detailed
information and the charge of each call. Operators can select either separate or
integrated test for the pre-paid service test.
Separate Test
7.3.9 The Metering Test is similar to Section 7.1. The following parameters should be
checked, wherever applicable, such as calling party, called party, call duration, charged
party (e.g. account number) and charging time stamp etc. The method of selecting DNs
is set out in Section 7.1.7. The number of pre-paid cards required for Metering Test is at
least 2.
7.3.10 The Billing Test is similar to Section 7.2. All in-service pre-paid SIM/calling
cards should be sampled for the Billing Test. In particular, procedures should be derived
in such a way to ensure samples are chosen randomly or pseudo-randomly.
______________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 27 JUNE 2017
7.3.11 Sampling of bills/calls/cards can be made in either automatic way or manual
ballot way. All the sampled records (bills, calls or cards etc.) must be listed out clearly
irrespective of whether the bills/calls/cards were used, discarded or any other possible
uses.
7.3.12 However, if sampling of cards is a manual process, then all the cards drawn
including filtered cards and selected cards must be recorded.
7.3.13 Only the calls made in previous month of the reporting period shall be included
for the test. The maximum and minimum numbers of calls per card for the pre-paid
system are the same as those per bill for post-paid system.
Integrated Test
7.3.14 The charged party shall be verified when the Metering System is tested. Call
charge should be calculated by applying the billing logic of the billing/pre-paid system.
This call charge is verified against the actual call charge deducted by the pre-paid system.
The actual call charge deducted by the pre-paid system can be checked and recorded by
listening to the IVRS voice or other methods whereas appropriate.
7.3.15 In case the test is failed, operators shall conduct investigations, report the
sources of faults (Metering System, Billing System, or both) and specify the remedy
actions taken to rectify the faults to OFCA. In case call duration record is not retrievable
from the pre-paid services platform, the operator must submit sufficient supporting
information for its investigation and argument to declare that the fault is due to Metering
System alone, Billing System alone, or both of them.
7.3.16 The passing criteria for pre-paid services using integrated platforms are
similar to those set out in Section 7.2.5. In case of pre-paid SIM cards offered by mobile
operators which can make both IDD calls and mobile calls, the number of pre-paid IDD
calls and pre-paid mobile calls are derived from the total number of pre-paid calls of that
mobile operator using traffic ratio, revenue or number of customers. The number of
pre-paid cards required for integrated test is at least 2.
______________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 28 JUNE 2017
General Procedure
7.3.17 The general procedures for testing the pre-paid systems are to –
a) Check the pre-paid cards for sufficient monetary value for making the Test
Calls;
b) Synchronise the clock with Hong Kong Observatory, if necessary;
c) Record the balance at the beginning of the tests;
d) Check the charged party (or card identifier) and duration during the
Metering Test whereas calling party, called party and time stamp would be
checked if necessary;
e) Record the remaining balance at the end of the tests;
f) Record the before-call and after-call balances to obtain the per-call charge
amount in case the per-call charge amount is not available from the pre-paid
system;
g) Record the deviation of the charging amount calculated manually and the
amount recorded by the pre-paid system for each call;
h) Add the absolute differences between manually calculated charge and the
actual deducted amount for each call and the sum of the differences is to be
regarded as total error for the pre-paid service;
i) Sum all calculated chargeable values to become the actual bill amount;
j) Check whether the passing criteria for the pre-paid card are fulfilled i.e. the
ratio of the total error and the actual bill amount does not exceed 1:10 000
and the arithmetic check set out in Section 7.2.4 is passed; and
k) Observe that the previous agreed procedures for handling rounding
treatment for post-paid service were applicable to pre-paid service.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 29 JUNE 2017
Template for Pre-paid Services
Separate Test
Metering Test
Call type: _________________
[Optional Table] Account No. / Card Identifier Initial Card Value
Derived Records from Test Calls Call Number Test Date Account No. /
Card Identifier Called Number
Answered Start Time
Duration
1 2 3
Derived from Prepay Service Platform Call Number
Test Date Account No. / Card Identifier
Called Number
Answered Start Time
Duration Test Result
1 2 3
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 30 JUNE 2017
Billing Test
Account No. / Card Identifier Initial Card Value Call Number
Test Date Called DN Start / End** Time (if applicable)
Recorded Duration
Rerated Call Charges
Call Charges Recorded by the Billing System
Card Balance* Absolute Error
1 2 3 4 5 X Total
Note: * Card Balance, except the balance at the end of the test, is an optional item.
** Deleted if appropriate.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 31 JUNE 2017
Integrated Test
Call type: ___________________
Account No. / Card Identifier Initial Card Value Call No.*
Test Date
Called DN
Card Balance Before Making the Test Call
Start / End** Time (answered) [if applicable]
Recorded Duration of Test Call
Charging Unit *
No. of Units (roundup) *
Unit Charge / Tariff
Manually Rated Call Charges (X)
Minimum Acceptable Duration *
MaximumAcceptable Duration *
Possible Call Charges (lower) *
Possible Call Charges (upper) *
Card Balance After Making the Test Call
Call Charges Deducted by the Billing System
Absolute Error (Y) (note)
Test Results (metering)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) 1 $100 58 6 10 $0.20 $2.00 49 67 $1.80 $2.40 $97.80 $2.20 $0.00 2 $97.80 58 6 10 $0.20 $2.00 49 67 $1.80 $2.40 $96.10 $1.70 $0.10 3 $96.10 58 6 10 $0.20 $2.00 49 67 $1.80 $2.40 $93.50 $2.60 $0.20 4 5 X
Passing criterion for Billing Test Result is: summation of Y ÷ summation of X ≤ 1:10 000
Billing Test Result: summation of Y ÷ summation of X ≤ 1:10 000 (pass criterion)
Note: * Optional items
** Deleted if appropriate.
(note): If (12) <= (15) <= (13), the absolute error is 0. (i.e. Call No. 1 case)
If (15) < (12), the absolute error is (12) - (15). (i.e. Call No. 2 case)
If (15) > (13), the absolute error is (15) - (13). (i.e. Call No. 3 case)
_____________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 32 JUNE 2017
8. Guidelines to Design Operator’s Detailed Operation Manual
8.1 Introduction
8.1.1 This section illustrates the guidelines to operators on how to design and compile
their DOM. The DOM integrates the operator’s all aspects of the Metering and Billing
Tests from network operating system to back-office Billing Systems. It provides the
information on the operators’ internal testing and coordination procedures and system or
equipment setup in meeting the requirements of this manual or the BMIS as a whole.
8.1.2 There are several guidelines to help operators to prepare the DOM such as –
• The purpose of the DOM is to give and explain the operation of operator’s
billing and metering processes, man machine interfaces, testing procedures
and system or equipment setup. It could also serve to assist the CPA in
understanding the detailed information before conducting the required
assurance exercise;
• Apart from giving the operation of billing and metering processes, testing
procedures and system/equipment setup, the DOM should also illustrate the
details about the reporting channel and mechanism to OFCA; and
• DOM should also specify when and how the details given therein would be
revised and updated.
8.1.3 The DOM should therefore include the following major headings –
• The description of the system/equipment setup to meet the requirements of the
Metering Model and standards;
• The description of the system/equipment setup to meet the requirements of the
Billing Model and standards;
• The Metering Tests and yardsticks;
• The Billing Tests and yardsticks;
• Self appraisal procedures;
• Self declaration;
• Monthly Report; and
• Procedures for revision.
_____________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 33 JUNE 2017
8.2 Details of Each Section
8.2.1 Contents of DOM should include the details given in the following table –
Item No.
Headings Contents
1. Introduction Describe the meaning of DOM. 2. Scope Describe the scope of DOM. 3. Description of the
telecommunications networks and systems involved in the Metering and Billing operations
Describe the functions and operations of various components of the operator’s telecommunications networks and systems involved in the processes of Metering and Billing. For details, refer to the relevant documents.
4. Description of the Metering System
Describe the setup and operation of the Metering System. For details, refer to the relevant documents.
5. Description of the rating, mediation and Billing Systems
Describe the setup and operation of the rating, mediation and Billing Systems. For details, refer to the relevant documents.
6. Description of the setup and internal procedures for carrying out the Metering Tests
Describe the procedures and methods in undertaking the Metering Test, such as – � yardsticks of the test; � who is responsible for the Metering Test; � when should the Metering Test be performed
(date of a specific month); � how many Test Calls should be made; � under what conditions should the test be
re-performed; � what are the reasons causing the failure of a
particular Metering Test (also give the reasons and causes behind the possible failure);
� what are the precautions or remedial actions to minimise the occurrence of failed Test Calls;
� when and who should submit the quarterly test results and self declaration forms (Metering Test part) by the operator’s responsible directorate officer/authorised staff; and
� when and who should submit the completed and signed self-declaration forms (Metering Test part) to OFCA/CPA.
7. Description of the setup and internal procedures for carrying out the Billing Tests
Describe the procedures and methods in undertaking the Billing Tests, such as – � yardsticks of the test; � who is responsible for the Billing Test; � when should the Billing Test be performed (date
of a specific month); � how many bills should be re-rated; � under what conditions should the test be
re-performed;
_____________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 34 JUNE 2017
Item No.
Headings Contents
� what are the reasons behind causing failure of a particular Billing Test;
� what are the precautions or remedial actions to minimise the occurrence of failed bills;
� when and who should submit the quarterly test results and self declaration forms (Billing Test part) by the operator’s responsible directorate officer/authorised staff; and when and who should submit the completed and signed self-declaration forms (Billing Test part) to OFCA/CPA.
8. Self declaration procedures Describe the internal procedures for self-declaration and submission of the completed and signed self-declaration forms or monthly reports to OFCA by the Submission Date set out in Section 9.2.4. State the name, post title of the operator’s directorate level or authorised staff responsible for making a self-declaration to OFCA on both Metering and Billing Tests.
9. Monthly test results
Describe the procedures and details on how a Metering and Billing System be sub-divided for appraisal, such as – • who should be responsible for carrying out the
Metering and Billing Tests and analysis of the collected test data;
• under what conditions will the monthly test results be submitted to OFCA;
• when should the monthly test results be submitted to OFCA; and
• who should countersign the monthly test results. 10. The procedure of revising the
DOM (change of staff, yardsticks etc.)
State under what conditions for which the DOM would be revised or changed and who is the responsible person for making the required amendments. All amendments must be documented and duly authorised by the operator’s responsible person.
11. Related documents If there are any related documents to the DOM, it is necessary to specify the names of these documents.
12. The format of monthly report Same format as given in Section 9.3 of QAM.
8.2.2 Yardsticks for Metering Test
1. Testing equipment tolerance
Testing equipment tolerance should be the tolerance as defined in the technical specification of equipment vendor or the tolerance as measured by the operator supported by a detailed test report to be included in the DOM.
_____________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 35 JUNE 2017
2. Metering Tolerance (“delay”) in operator’s network
• Metering Tolerance (“delay”) in operator’s network is to be declared by operators; and/or
• Metering Tolerance as defined in this manual or as approved by OFCA.
3. Randomness of sampling
• To ensure randomness of sampling, the operator may use ballot or pseudo-random method to draw the test pattern;
• For calling numbers, two testing numbers are to be drawn from a pool of 100 DNs or internal network routing and testing numbers for use in the test; and
• For called numbers, testing numbers are to be drawn from a pool of 100 DNs or internal network routing and testing numbers for use in the test.
4. System clock accuracy
� Operator is required to declare the system clock accuracy in DOM by referencing to the relevant technical specifications supplied by their equipment vendors/self declaration; and
� Operator is required to declare the routine procedures to calibrate the system clock and synchronise with Hong Kong Observatory’s clock.
5. Any other yardsticks where necessary
8.2.3 Yardsticks for Billing Test
1. Charging unit
State at least the reference showing the operator’s existing charging unit such as six seconds basis.
2. Unit rate
State at least the reference showing the unit rate for each charging unit such as $0.2 per six seconds.
3. Call charge per minute in operator’s Billing System
Operator’s call charge published in the tariff plans such as $2 per minute.
4. Rounding treatments • Rounding treatments that have been used in the Billing System; and
• Billing methodology especially those steps involve rounding treatment (e.g. all the steps in generating a charged IDD call in the bill). A sample bill is necessary to illustrate the situations.
5. Name of the operator’s Billing System, version and vendors, if any, for developing the Billing Systems
6. Accuracy on the conversion of electronic record to voice by IVRS equipment
Operator shall self-declare the accuracy on the conversion of electronic record to voice by IVRS equipment. A typical voice prompt is to read out the remaining pre-paid card values.
7. Any other yardsticks where necessary
_____________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 36 JUNE 2017
8.2.4 Operators can determine to use only one of the sampling parameters which will
cover all their customers to randomise the selection of their samples for the Billing Tests.
The sampling parameters are: –
(i) Account Number;
(ii) DN; or
(iii) Invoice Number.
8.2.5 Operators are required to specify the sampling parameters of the Billing Test in
the “Yardsticks for Billing Test” of the DOM. Operators should apply the market
exchange rate fairly in their billing procedures.
8.2.6 The operators should endeavour that charging information can be made available upon request by customers including but not limited to the following items whichever applicable –
� call duration/usage (in calling units or seconds); � unit charge tariff (to the nearest cent); � the exchange rate applied if necessary (in four significant figures); � the discount plan applied; and � call bill amount (to the nearest cent).
_____________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 37 JUNE 2017
9. Monthly Test Report
9.1 Introduction
9.1.1 Operators should prepare the testing report on monthly basis and submit the
self-declaration forms for the compliance status, Metering Test and Billing Test to
OFCA half-yearly using the format attached in Annexes 2,3 and 4 respectively. This
section describes the self-declaration procedure and the format of the test report that is to
be submitted by operators after conducting the Metering and Billing Tests.
9.1.2 All the measurements or test results generated and collected during the Metering
Tests and Billing Tests must be properly recorded and documented in the monthly test
report. Operators should not selectively submit test data collected from the test for test
report preparation purpose.
9.2 Self-Declaration Procedures
9.2.1 Operators are required to make self-declarations half-yearly to OFCA on its
monthly test results of the Metering and Billing Systems. Operators can make their own
arrangement for the Metering and Billing Tests. However, some general guidelines are
suggested as follows.
Guidelines
9.2.2 At the beginning of each month, operators prepare, set up and perform the Billing
and Metering Tests in accordance with the DOM. In case of any unsuccessful test results
due to abnormal circumstances of the testing environment, the operators shall
re-perform some of the tests if necessary*. Operators are required to prepare the test
reports and self-declaration forms according to the test results.
* The condition for re-test can be –
a. system outage – e.g. the communication link is out of order;
b. unforeseen disaster – e.g. red rain/black rain storm, typhoon that causes
heavy load of communication link; and/or
c. test equipment failure.
_____________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 38 JUNE 2017
Mandatory Requirements
9.2.3 Apart from the general guidelines outlined above, operators must fulfil some
mandatory requirements as mentioned in the following paragraphs.
9.2.4 Operators must submit the self-declaration forms to OFCA by the twenty-fifth of
the month immediately following the sixth month in which the tests are conducted (“the
Submission Date”). If any test results done within the six months are failed, operators
should also submit the monthly test reports together with the self-declaration forms to
OFCA by the Submission Date. Allowable extension to the end of the calendar month of
the Submission Date can be given if request is made in advance to OFCA before the
Submission Date through email at [email protected].
9.2.5 For instance, if the tests are conducted in January, February, March, April, May
and June, the self-declaration forms and also any failed test reports for these six months
should reach OFCA at [email protected] by 25th July. If the monthly test results have
passed, operators only need to submit the self-declaration forms to OFCA in the same
manner by the Submission Date. Meanwhile, operators should keep the monthly test
reports to be checked by the CPA. The operators should complete the monthly test
results by the Submission Date.
9.2.6 The one who signs and submits the self-declaration forms to OFCA should be at
the operator’s directorate level or authorised staff. Operator’s submissions of
self-declaration forms and test reports should use the format/template as defined and
given in this manual.
9.2.7 It is the responsibility of individual operators to submit the self-declaration forms
and test reports to OFCA on time. OFCA will not be held responsible for chasing any
operators for the required submissions.
9.3 Format of Test Report
9.3.1 Operators are required to prepare the test reports about the Metering Test and
Billing Test performed. In general, the test reports should be sufficient to derive the
results of the test for inspection purpose. Therefore, the test report should at least keep
the records of the checked test data.
_____________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 39 JUNE 2017
Format of Metering Test Report Using the Metering Test
9.3.2 For operators employing the Metering Test in Section 7.1.3, it should include a
test report showing the matching results between the following derived data from the
Billing System and call generator –
• DN (i.e. calling party/charged party);
• Dialled number (i.e. called party information sufficient for billing purpose);
• Charging Time Stamp;
• Duration/Usage; and
• Call Date.
9.3.3 In order to allow easy reference of each record, the following additional fields are
recommended also –
• Test sequence number (for cross reference of matched records);
• Service type (“Mobile/Mobile IDD”, “IDD/ETS”, “IAS”);
• Metering Tolerance (as specified for different service type in this manual);
• Test equipment tolerance;
• Charging Time Stamp tolerance;
• Difference of Charging Time Stamp;
• Difference of duration/usage;
• Result (result of individual records checked, either “P” = Pass or “F”=Fail”);
and
• Total number of failed calls in the test at the end of the report.
Format of Metering Test Report Using Per Call Test
9.3.4 For operators employing Per Call Test in Section 7.1.15, the test report should
include two parts. Part I of the test report includes the matching results between the
following derived data from the CDR and Test Call generator and Part II of the test
report includes the matching results between the following derived data from the Billing
System and the CDR –
• DN (i.e. calling party/charged party);
• Dialled number (i.e. called party information sufficient for billing purpose);
• Charging Time Stamp;
• Duration/Usage; and
_____________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 40 JUNE 2017
• Call Date.
9.3.5 In order to allow easy reference of each record, the following additional fields are
recommended also –
• Test sequence number (for cross reference of matched records);
• Service type (“Mobile/Mobile IDD”, “IDD/ETS”, “IAS”);
• Metering Tolerance (as specified for different service type in this manual,
not applicable to Part II);
• Test equipment tolerance;
• Charging Time Stamp tolerance;
• Difference of Charging Time Stamp;
• Difference of duration/usage;
• Result (result of individual records checked, either “P”=Pass or “F”=Fail”);
and
• Total number of failed calls in the test at the end of the report.
Format of Billing Test Report
9.3.6 For Billing Test report, it should include detailed bills, worksheet of checking
detailed bills and summary of the results of checking detailed bills.
9.3.7 The detailed bills should include all charging information as follows –
• Service type (“Mobile/Mobile IDD”, “IDD/ETS”, “ISP”);
• Sampling identification, i.e. DN, Account Number, or Invoice Number;
• Call date;
• Charging Time Stamp (for item associated with time and usage charge);
• Dialled number (for item associated with time and usage charge);
• Duration/ Usage (for item associated with time and usage charge);
• Charging description (for item not associated with time and usage charge);
• Billed amount; and
• Calling Party or Charged Party.
9.3.8 The worksheet of checking detailed bills should include charging information on
the bills and the actual calculated amount as follows –
• Bill number (identification of the bill sampled for cross reference of result
_____________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 41 JUNE 2017
checking);
• Service type (“Mobile/Mobile IDD”, “IDD/ETS”, “IAS”);
• Sampling identification, i.e. DN, Account Number, or Invoice Number;
• Item reference (reference for the items on bill);
• Call date;
• Charging Time Stamp (for item associated with time and usage charge);
• Charging description (for item not associated with time and usage charge);
• Duration;
• Number of units (calculate from duration/ usage);
• Unit charge;
• Discount;
• Actual calculated amount (amount calculated manually);
• Billed amount (amount shown on bill);
• Difference of charging amount (i.e. absolute value of difference between
Actual Calculated Amount and Billed Amount);
• Total actual calculated amount of the bill (sum of all Actual Calculated
Amount);
• Total difference of charging amount of the bill (sum of all Difference of
Charging Amount); and
• Calling Party or Charged Party.
9.3.9 The summary of the results of checking detailed bills should include the results of
the bills being checked as follows –
• Bill number (identification of the bill sampled for cross reference of result
checking);
• Total difference of charging amount of the bill (sum of all Difference of
Charging Amount);
• Total actual bill amount of the bill (sum of all Actual Bill Amount);
• Ratio of difference of the bill (calculated by Total Difference of Charging
Amount of the bill / Total Actual Calculated Amount of the bill);
• Result (result of individual bill checked, either “P”=Pass or “F”=Fail);
• Threshold per bill (for reference only);
• Total number of bills failed (number of bills with ratio of difference greater
than threshold); and
• Result of Billing Test (Passed or failed).
_____________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 42 JUNE 2017
9.3.10 A sample of all test reports is attached in Annex 5 for reference. Although there
is no need for operators to provide the passed test reports regularly to OFCA, operators
should keep them for at least three years in case there is a need for OFCA or CPA to
make reference to them.
_____________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 43 JUNE 2017
10. Reference Documents
HKCA 3105 “Requirements on the Assurance, Reporting and Monitoring Procedures for
the Billing and Metering Integrity Scheme” issued by the CA
ISO 2859-1:1999 (E) “Sampling Procedures for Inspection by Attributes – Part
1:Sampling Plans Indexed by Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) for Lot-by-Lot
Inspection”
Office of Telecommunications (Oftel, UK) “Standard for Telecommunications Metering
Systems and Billing Systems OTR003:2001”
Australian Communications Industry Forum “Industry Code on Call Charging and
Billing Accuracy ACIF C518:2000”
Statement of the CA on “Billing and Metering Integrity Scheme” issued on 23
November 2005
_____________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 44 JUNE 2017
Annex 1
Switching Rules and Procedures
Reduced
Inspection
Normal
Inspection
Tightened
Inspection
Discontinue
Inspection
Monthly test not
accepted or “Note 4” Switching Score ≥ 30 and “Note 3”
5 consecutive monthly tests
accepted
2 of 5 or fewer consecutive
monthly tests not accepted
OFCA approval of reversion
to Tightened Inspection
5 monthly tests not accepted while
on tightened inspection
Start
Note 3: reduced inspection is considered desirable by the operator.
Note 4: instructions given by OFCA that normal inspection shall be re-instated.
____________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 45 JUNE 2017
Annex 2
Self-Declaration Form for Compliance Status
Billing and Metering Integrity Scheme
Self-Declaration Form
Compliance Status on [Date]
I declare that our company has followed the requirements in accordance with the HKCA
3104 “Quality Assurance Manual for Billing and Metering Integrity Scheme” to carry
out metering and billing integrity tests and is in compliance with/not in compliance with
the BMIS on [Date].
Company name: ___________________________________
Licence type:____________________________
Licence number:____________________________
Name of responsible person: ________________________
Position: ______________________
Telephone: ____________________________
Fax:___________________________________
Email address: _________________________
Date: _________________________
Signature: _____________________
____________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 46 JUNE 2017
Annex 3
Self-Declaration Form for the Metering Test
Billing and Metering Integrity Scheme
Self-Declaration Form of the Metering Test on [Date]
I declare that our company has followed the requirements in accordance with the HKCA
3104 “Quality Assurance Manual for Billing and Metering Integrity Scheme” to carry
out metering and billing integrity tests and the results are as follows –
Metering Test
Testing period: _____________ (e.g. August 2012)
Number of Test Calls made: __________ (e.g. 1 250)
Number of failed calls: ___________ (e.g. 1)
Test result: ________ (e.g. Pass with 10 switching score)
Inspection status before this test: ________ (refer to Annex 6 of QAM)
Inspection status after this test: __________ (refer to Annex 6 of QAM)
Metering Test/Per Call Test (please specify) (Note 5):________ (e.g. Metering Test)
Number of calls sampled in Per Call Test Part 2: _____________(e.g. 1 250)
Number of failed calls in Per Call Test Part 2: _______________(e.g. 1)
Company name: ___________________________________
Licence type: ____________________________
Licence number: ____________________________
Name of authorised person: ________________________
Position: _______________________
Telephone: ___________________________ Fax:________________________
Email address: _________________________ Date: _________________________
Signed with company chop: ___________________________
Note 5:
The Metering Test: test from call generator to Billing System.
Per Call Test: A two-part Metering Test: Part 1 to reconcile Test Call log records with
call details from a metering point and Part 2 to reconcile call details from that metering
point with call details from Billing System.
____________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 47 JUNE 2017
Annex 4
Self-Declaration Form for the Billing Test
Billing and Metering Integrity Scheme
Self-Declaration Form of the Billing Test on [Date]
I declare that our company has followed the requirements in accordance with the HKCA
3104 “Quality Assurance Manual for Billing and Metering Integrity Scheme” to carry
out metering and billing integrity tests and the results are as follows –
Billing Test
Testing period: _____________ (e.g. August 2012)
Number of bills checked: __________ (e.g. 50)
Number of failed bills: ___________ (e.g. 0)
Test result: ________ (e.g. Pass with 10 switching score)
Inspection status before this test: ________ (refer to Annex 6 of QAM)
Inspection status after this test: __________ (refer to Annex 6 of QAM)
Company name: ___________________________________
Licence type:____________________________
Licence number:____________________________
Name of authorised person: ________________________
Position: ______________________
Telephone: ___________________________ Fax:___________________________
Email address: ________________________ Date: _________________________
Signed with company chop: ___________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 48 JUNE 2017
Annex 5
Format of Metering and Billing Test Report
Example of a Monthly Metering Test Report Using Metering Test Method Specified in “Methodology to Verify Metering System Using Test Calls”
in Section 7.1.3
Derived Records from Call Generator Test
Sequence Directory Number
Dialled Number Call Date Charging Time Stamp (start/end* time)
(A1)
Duration /Usage (A2)
Service Type
Test Equipment Tolerance
(in seconds) e.g. 1 2123 1234 00x 1 212 xxxxxxx 1 Dec 2012 9:05:00 p.m. 2 min 30 sec IDD 2
2 3
5000 *: delete whereas appropriate.
Derived Records from Billing System Test
Sequence Directory Number
Dialled Number Charging Time Stamp (start/end* time)
(B1)
Duration/ Usage (B2)
Service Type
Metering Tolerance (in seconds)
e.g. 1 2123 4567 00x 1 212 xxxxxxx 9:05:03 p.m. 2 min 33 sec IDD 1 2 3
5000
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 49 JUNE 2017
Results of Difference between Call Generator and Billing System Test
Sequence Difference of
Charging Time Stamp (start/end* time)
(B1-A1)
Difference of Duration/Usage (B2-A2)
Result Difference of Caller ID
Difference of Calling ID
e.g. 1 0 0 F – mismatch 2 3
5000 *: delete whereas appropriate
Report prepared by
Company: _____________________
Name: ___________________
Position: __________________
Telephone: __________________
Fax: _______________________
Email:______________________
Date: _____________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 50 JUNE 2017
Example of a Monthly Metering Test Report Using Metering Test Method Specified in “Alternative Method by Per Call Test”
in Section 7.1.15
Part I
Derived Records from Call Generator Test
Sequence Directory Number
Dialled Number Call Date Charging Time Stamp (start/end* time)
(A1)
Duration /Usage (A2)
Service Type
Test Equipment Tolerance
(in seconds) e.g. 1 2123 1234 00x 1 212 xxxxxxx 1 Dec 2012 9:05:00 p.m. 2 min 30 sec IDD 2
2 3
5000 *: delete whereas appropriate
Derived Records from CDR Test
Sequence Directory Number
Dialled Number Charging Time Stamp (start/end* time)
(B1)
Duration/ Usage (B2)
Service Type
Metering Tolerance
(in seconds) e.g. 1 2123 4567 00x 1 212 xxxxxxx 9:05:03 p.m. 2 min 33 sec IDD 1
2 3
5000 Results of Difference between Call Generator and CDR
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 51 JUNE 2017
Test Sequence
Difference of Charging Time Stamp
(start/end* time) (B1-A1)
Difference of Duration/Usage
(B2-A2)
Result
e.g. 1 0 0 F – mismatch 2 3
5000 *: delete whereas appropriate
Report prepared by
Company: _____________________
Name: ___________________
Position: __________________
Telephone: __________________
Fax: _______________________
Email:______________________
Date: _____________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 52 JUNE 2017
Part II
Derived Records from CDR Test
Sequence Directory Number
Dialled Number Call Date Charging Time Stamp (start/end* time)
(A1)
Duration /Usage (A2)
Service Type
e.g. 1 2123 1234 00x 1 212 xxxxxxx 1 Dec 2012 9:05:00 p.m. 2 min 30 sec IDD 2 3
5000 *: delete whereas appropriate
Derived Records from Billing System Test
Sequence Directory Number
Dialled Number Charging Time Stamp (start/end* time)
(B1)
Duration/ Usage (B2)
Service Type
e.g. 1 2123 4567 00x 1 212 xxxxxxx 9:05:03 p.m. 2 min 33 sec IDD 2 3
5000
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 53 JUNE 2017
Results of Difference between CDR and Billing System Test
Sequence Difference of
Charging Time Stamp (start/end* time)
(B1-A1)
Difference of Duration/Usage (B2-A2)
Result
e.g. 1 0 0 F – mismatch 2 3
5000 *: delete whereas appropriate
Report prepared by
Company: _____________________
Name: ___________________
Position: __________________
Telephone: __________________
Fax: _______________________
Email:______________________
Date: _____________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 54 JUNE 2017
An Example of a Monthly Billing Test Report
Worksheet of Checking Detail Bills
Bill Number: 1
Service Type: IDD service
Sample Identification (Directory No./Account No./Invoice No.): XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Charging Items Item
Sequence Call Date
Calling Party/ Charged Party
Charging Time Stamp
(start/end* time)
Charging Description
Duration No. of Units
Unit Charge
Discount Actual Calculated
Amount (A)
Billed Amount (B)
Difference of Charging Amount
(ABS(A – B)) e.g. 1 DD-MMM-YY HH:MM XXX XXX $X.XXX
X XX% $XX.XX $2.80 0.00
2 3
30 XXXXXX $XX.XX $30.00 0.00
Total Per Bill
$XXXXX.XX $X.XX
*: delete whereas appropriate
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 55 JUNE 2017
Result Summary of Checking Detailed Bills Bill
Number Total Difference
of Charging Amount (C)
Total Actual Calculated
Amount (D)
Ratio of Difference (C/D)
Threshold Per Bill (E)
Result (P if C/D <= E; F if C/D > E)
Arithmetic Check
Overall Result (Note 6)
1 $X.XXXX $XXXXX.XX X.XXXX X.XXXX P F F 2 $X.XXXX $XXXXX.XX X.XXXX X.XXXX P P 3 $X.XXXX $XXXXX.XX X.XXXX X.XXXX F P F 4 $X.XXXX $XXXXX.XX X.XXXX X.XXXX F F F 50 $X.XXXX $XXXXX.XX X.XXXX X.XXXX P P P
Note 6: Overall result=threshold result logical AND arithmetic result.
Total Number of Bills Failed: X
Billing Test Result: (Passed or Failed)
Report prepared by
Company: _____________________
Name: ___________________
Position: __________________
Telephone: __________________
Fax: _______________________
Email:______________________
Date: ___________
_____________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 56 JUNE 2017
Annex 6
Inspection Status
1 Normal Inspection Switching Score = X 1 of Y consecutive monthly tests
not accepted Note: X=0,2,4,..,28 Note: Y=1,2,3,4 (this clause is
needed only when in jeopardy) 2 Reduced Inspection 3 Tightened Inspection X consecutive monthly
tests accepted Y cumulative monthly tests not accepted
Note: X=0,1,2,3,4 Note: Y=0,1,2,3,4 4 Discontinue Inspection
_____________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________ HKCA 3104 ISSUE 3 PAGE 57 JUNE 2017
Annex 7
Format of Test Report for Rounding Treatment Test
Billing and Metering Integrity Scheme
Rounding Treatment Test
I report our company’s results of rounding treatment test as follows –
Testing period: _____________ (e.g. September 2012 to September 2013)
Number of bills used: __________ (e.g. 600)
Discrepancies: ____________ (e.g. + $1.3)
Total Billed Amount: ____________ (e.g. $60,000)
I have attached a soft copy using a format/template defined by OFCA for all details of
the test. In this soft copy, it shall include, but not limited to, per call discrepancy (“Eij”),
actual per call charge up to 4 decimal places (“A’Bij”), operator billed per call charge
calculated according to operator’s billing logic (“ABij”).
Bill No.
Item Sequence
ABij Operator Billed Per Call Charge (calculated from operator’s billing logic usually with 2 decimal places in dollar terms)
A’ Bij Actual Per Call Charge (with 4 decimal places in dollar terms)
Per Call Discrepancy, (Eij)
e.g. 1 1 $4.80 $4.7850 $0.015 $4.7 $4.7350 $-0.035
Company name: ___________________________________
Licence type: __________________________
Licence number: ____________________________
Name of authorised person: ________________________
Position: ______________________
Date: _________________________
Email address: _________________________
Telephone: ____________________________
Fax: __________________________________
Signed with company chop: ___________________________