Date post: | 17-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | gervais-henderson |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Quality ManagersWhat are they good for?
Pat BeardPathology Quality Manager
New Cross Hospital Wolverhampton
Governance
o Compliance with Trust Governance Strategyo Minutes
o Record evidence for NHSLA Scheme
o Incident Reporting o Completion of cycle, timeliness, Categorisation of incidentso Trend analysis
o Risk Registero Review and escalationo Controls Assurance
o Action Plans – Responsibilities, Resources, Target Times
CONTRIBUTION
Corrective Actions
User Satisfaction
Turnaround Times
Document Control
PathologyNewsletter
User Guide
ImprovementTools
Request Rejection
Quality Improvement
VALUEOutputs
TIME
Waste
QUALITY
Variation
COST
STRATEGY
Quality Management Systems
Quality
Improvement
Quality
Procedures
Quality
(Learning)
Culture
1st STEP 2nd STEP 3rd STEP
Culture
Actualisation/ Esteem
Belonging
Safety
Physiological
Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
o Number one reason for employees leaving an employer is the (poor) relationship they have with their line managers.
o Dissatisfaction is the single best predictor of absenteeism
o Estimates that between 70 – 80 % of absenteeism is stress related.
Stress
Per capita
Homeless, unemployed
1 2
Blue collar workers
3
White collar /Managerial
4
White collar /Managerial
5
White collar /Managerial
6
Independently wealthy
Who experiences stress: Black Report (1989)
Socio – economic groups
A different way of thinking
o Creation of a Quality Culture
o Management commitment
o respect, o recognition, o personal development, o understanding and support
o Strategic planning for quality
Improvement infrastructureo Leadership
o Systemisationo Anything the organisation does should be systemised – set
down in procedureo Tracking improvements – updating procedures
o Roles and Responsibilities
o Processo Methodical approach to quality improvement
for example – DMAIC systematic approach used in six sigmao Defineo Measureo Analyseo Implemento Control
Improvement People
o Good Management
o Training for all grades
o Involving all grades of staff
‘Quality at the end of the day is human
commitment’
W.E.Deming
Thank You
Document Control
o Evidence – Good Governanceo Document Control and review
o Procedures
o Minutes
o Action Plans
o Reports
Knowledge Managemento Tacit knowledge that exists in someone’s head
o Explicit knowledge that has been documented in some way, allowing others to share it
o Pathology Policieso Departmental Procedures
o Notices and Instructions
Improvement Tools
o Root Cause Analysis
o Process Flow Charts
o Option Appraisal
On Call BMS
DOStock Take
of Blood
UPDATEfrom
Accident & Emergency Department
Have other staff
arrived?
Major Incident 'Declared'
Immediately
No
CONTACTSenior BMS
CONTACTOther Haematology
Staff
Haematology Consultant
INFORMBlood Transfusion
Service of
possible usage
Obtain predicted blood usage from
the Accident & Emergency Department
If unable to contact Senior BMS
contact next BMS in priority
Subsequently
Yes
DE-RESERVEnon essential cross-matches
Set UpO Negative
Flyers
Set UpEmergency
Blood Box(es)
Process samples
PrioritiseWork
Continue with Routine work if
appropriate
Option Appraisal
Option 1 Option 2 Option 3
Weighting Factor
ScoreWeighted
ScoreScore
Weighted Score
ScoreWeighted
Score
Objective 1:5 8 40 3 15 10 50
Objective 2:2 5 10 10 20 7 14
Objective 3: 2 5 10 3 6 4 8
Objective 4:1 10 10 10 10 5 5
TOTALS 10 26 70 26 51 26 77
Corrective and Preventative Actions
o Sourceso Complaintso Internal Auditso External Auditso Other external inspectiono Risk Identificationo Error logging
o Corrective actionso Completion of cycleo Preventative Actions
o Project Management - Objectives- Responsibilities - Action Plans - Monitoring and Review - Target dates
Rejected Microbiology Requests
0.00%
0.10%
0.20%
0.30%
0.40%
0.50%
0.60%
0.70%U
nlab
elle
d
Leak
ing
Mis
mat
ch
Mis
cella
neou
s
Inap
prop
riate
Sam
ple
Col
lect
ion
date
No
sam
ple
Info
rmat
ion
onfo
rm
No
Req
uest
form
Reasons for rejection
% o
f T
ota
l R
equ
ests
2003
2004
2005
Year 2003 2004 2005
Rejected Samples 1762 1804 1857
Total Requests 169578 171303 187301
% Rejected 1.04% 1.05% 0.99%
Question Score? Comments
Department Poor OK Good faults/compliments/ suggestions:
0 2 4 6 8 10
1 Your overall estimated quality rating for these Pathology service (s):
Clinical Chemistry
Haematology
Blood Bank
Immunology
Histopathology
Cytology
Microbiology
User Satisfaction Survey
Car
diot
hora
cic
Car
diot
hora
cic
Car
diot
hora
cic
Car
diot
hora
cic
Car
diot
hora
cic
Car
diot
hora
cic
Car
diot
hora
cic
Car
diot
hora
cic
Car
diot
hora
cic
Car
diot
hora
cic
Cin
ical
Sci
ence
sM
edic
ine
Med
icin
eM
edic
ine
Med
icin
eM
edic
ine
Med
icin
eO
ncol
gyO
ncol
ogy
Onc
olog
yO
ncol
ogy
Opt
halm
olog
yO
ptha
lmol
ogy
Opt
halm
olog
yS
urge
ryS
urge
ryS
urge
ryS
urge
ryS
urge
ryS
urge
ryS
urge
ryS
urge
ryS
urge
ryU
nkno
wn
Unk
now
nW
omen
's &
Chi
ldre
nsW
omen
's &
Chi
ldre
nsW
omen
's &
Chi
ldre
nsW
omen
's &
Chi
ldre
nsW
omen
's &
Chi
ldre
nsW
omen
's &
Chi
ldre
nsW
omen
's &
Chi
ldre
nsW
omen
's &
Chi
ldre
ns
S1S2S3S4S5S6S7
8-10
6-8
4-6
2-4
0-2
Pathology Service User Perception vs. Location
Contour Map
Microbiology Best Endeavour Times in hours
Test Inpatient Out/GP Urgent
Expected Tested Expected Tested Expected Tested
Urines 24/48 27:05:02 24/48 26:34:41 24 NA
Faeces Culture 48/72 53:09:28 48/72 54:24:22 48 NA
Faeces Microscopy 48 48:09:45 48 49:12:16 4 NA
Genital GUM 48/72 64:49:03 48 NA
Genital non-GUM 48/72 58:46:15 48/72 54:41:47 48 NA
MRSA screens 48 47:28:15 48 47:37:20 48 NA
Mycology - Micro 48 > 4 Days 48 > 4 Days 24 NA
Pus/Swabs 48/72 48:10:54 48/72 47:45:42 48 NA
Respiratory (TB) Microscopy 24 17:10:25 24 44:00:21 4 NA
Serology Chlamydia ELISA 48 40:52:29 48 37:46:49 24 NA
Serology Hepatitis C 24 05:19:44 24 05:47:35 4 NA
Serology Hepatitis Bs Ag/core 24 05:36:32 24 06:11:45 4 NA
Serology HIV 24 08:29:04 24 08:06:05 4 NA
Serology Rubella IgG 24 27:05:16 24 25:40:37 4 NA
Serology Syphilis 24 26:45:13 24 29:36:17 24 NA