HUMBOLDT-UNIVERSITÄT ZU BERLIN
Quantum chemistry and wavefunction based methods for electron correlation !
IMPRS Block Course!Schmöckwitz, March 1, 2012!
Joachim Sauer!Institut für Chemie, Humboldt-Universität!
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
Wlodzimierz Kolos 1928 - 1996
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
MgO(001)/CO!
Mg2+ C O
O2-
CO/MgO(001) !
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
Example: CO/MgO(001) Observed binding energy 15 kJ/mol!
CO/Mg(001) !
Nygren, Pettersson, J. Chem. Phys. 105 (1996) 9339!
2002
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
(terrace)!
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Temperature programmed desorption!
Wichtendahl,... Kuhlenbeck, Freund, Surf. Sci. 423 (1999) 90!
(terrace)!
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Temperature programmed desorption!
Wichtendahl,... Kuhlenbeck, Freund, Surf. Sci. 423 (1999) 90!
29 K peak: multilayer!76 K peak: defects!
Readhead!57 K Peak: {Mg2+}5c!
(ν=1013 s-1) ! !0.14 eV (15 kJ/mol)!
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
CH4/MgO(100)!
Tait, Dohnalek, Campbell, Kay, JCP 122 (2005) 164708!Monolayer,
„dipod� configuration (Larese et al.)
13.1 kJ/mol (40 K) (He scattering)
12.6 kJ/mol (Θ=1)!c 2x 2 R 45o (Coulomb et al.)
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
CH4/MgO(100) - Temperature Programmed Desorption!
Tait, Dohnalek, Campbell, Kay, JCP 122 (2005) 164708!
E0=11.1, γ =1.53
Attractive interaction between molecules!Cluster formation at low coverage
(terrace)!
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
CH4/MgO(100) - Arrhenius Barrier vs. Desorption Energy!
EA = Hd + RT! kJ!/mol!Arrhenius barrier EA! 12.6! 13.1!T/K! 47! 40!Hd=EA - RT! 12.2! 12.8!ΔH(T)1 1.1! 1.0!Hd(0) = Hd - ΔH(T)! 11.1! 11.8!ZPVE1 -4.2! -4.2!Ed = Hd(0) - ZPVE! 15.3! 16.0!
15.3± 0.6!
1 Vibrational contributions from PBE+D slab calculations!
EA = Hd + RT!Hd(T)= Ed + EZPV + ΔH(T)!
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
P. Dirac, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A123 (1929) 714:!„The general theory of quantum mechanics is now almost complete...!The underlying physical laws necessary for the mathematical theory of .... the whole of chemistry are thus completely known, and the difficulty is only that the exact application of these laws leads to equations that are much too complicated to be soluble.“!
It therefore becomes desirable that approximate methods of applying quantum mechanics should be developed, which can lead to an explanation of the main features of complex atomic systems without too much computation.!
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has awarded The 1998 Nobel Prize in Chemistry in the area of quantum chemistry to Walter Kohn, University of California at Santa Barbara, USA and John A. Pople, Northwestern Univ., Evanston, Ill., USA (British citizen). Citation: "to Walter Kohn for his development of the density-functional theory and to John Pople for his development of computational methods in quantum chemistry."
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Accuracy · (system size)m ≈ constant(resources)!
Quantum chemistry
Density functional theory (DFT)! for full periodic structures feasible!
Dispersion largely missing:!Van der Waals functional (Langreth & Lundquist)!
Pragmatic solution: DFT+D (e.g. Grimme)!
Coupled cluster expansion of wave function: CCSD(T)!2nd order Moller-Plesset perturbation theory: MP2 !
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
Surface Reaction!
TS
Catalyst!+ Educt!
Intrinsic!Barrier!
Catalyst-Educt!Complex!
Catalyst-Product!Complex!
Binding!energy!
Reaction energy!
Apparent!Barrier!
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
DFT problems with barriers!
TS
Catalyst!+ Educt!
Intrinsic!Barrier!
Catalyst-Educt!Complex!
Catalyst-Product!Complex!
Binding!energy!
Van der Waals (dispersion)
SI error (reaction site)
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
Zeolite catalysts: active sites (transition metal ions, protons) in a „surface-only� silica matrix!
H
-Si+Al,
AlSiO O
O O
AlSiO O
O O
H
SiSiO O
O OM+
H
-Si+Al,
AlSiO O
O O
AlSiO O
O O
H
SiSiO O
O OM+
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
Zeolite catalysis: Methanol-to-hydrocarbons!
Review: Stöcker, Microp. and Mesop. Mat. 29 (1999) 3-48!
Methanol from different sources !
CH3OH! CH3OCH3!
CH2=CH2!
CH2=CH-CH3!
Cyclic Polyens!
Aromatic HC!
Methylation!
C-C Formation, induction!
+ CH3OH!
Gasoline!Olefines!
MTG MTO!
Hydrocarbon pool!mechanism!
Haw et al, Kolboe et al.
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
MeOH (g) Alkene (g)
MeOH (ads) Alkene (g)
MeOH (ads) Alkene (ads) Water (ads)
Alkene (ads)
Water (g) Alkene (g)
Transition structure
*S. Svelle, P.A. Ronning, S. Kolboe, J. Catal. 2004, 224, 115.!S. Svelle, P.O. Ronning, U. Olsbye, S. Kolboe,J. Catal. 2005, 234, 385.!
Methylation of ethene, propene, trans-2-butene in H-MFI!
Measured* Apparent Barrier Ethene 104 Propene 64 (-40) t-2-Butene 40 (-24)
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
Methylation of alkenes in H-MFI - pbc DFT!
Svelle, Tuma, Rozanska, Kerber, Sauer, JACS 131 (2009) 816!
Error increases with chain length
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
s6 = 1.4/1.3/0.7 for BLYP/BP86/PBE
Parameters are as good for solids (condensed systems) as for molecules Note, however, Mg2+ very different from Mg, whereas O2- similar to O Implementation of Ewald sum for 1/r6 for periodic systems
Etotal = EDFT +Edisp
Edisp = −s6C6
ij
rij6j = i +1
N
∑i =1
N −1
∑ fdamp fdamp (R) = 1
1+e-α (R/R0 -1)
Pragmatic solution: DFT + Dispersion (DFT+D)!
Grimme, J. Comput. Chem., 2004, 25, 1463; 2006, 27, 1787.!
Many predecessors with DFT, HF+Disp, e.g. Ahlrichs and Scoles!Many more sophisticated schemes!
Kerber, Sierka, Sauer, J. Comput. Chem. 29 (2008) 2088.!
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
Methylation of alkenes in H-MFI - pbc DFT+D!
Svelle, Tuma, Rozanska, Kerber, Sauer, JACS 131 (2009) 816!
Dispersion - increases with chain length
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
Methylation of alkenes in H-MFI - pbc DFT+D!
Svelle, Tuma, Rozanska, Kerber, Sauer, JACS 131 (2009) 816!
Dispersion
Too low barrier!constant SIC error!
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
Errors on energy barriers (Truhlar et al.)!
Nucleophilic substitution
kcal/mol
Reference data: CCSD(T) with extrapolation to complete basis set limit(„W1 theory�)
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
DFT (PBE/plane waves), VASP 20.2x20.5x13.5 Å; 96 +18 atoms Periodic Boundary Conditions
b _
_a
CCSD(T)/cbs 17+17 Atome C3O11Si2AlH17 MOLPRO
MP2/TZVP 123+67Atome C3O72Si47AlH67 CC2 code
Divide and Conquer - Models and Methodsn!
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
Hybrid high level : low level method!
Ehybrid (S,C) = EDFT+D(S) + [EMP2(C) - EDFT+D(C)]!
High level correction
Step 0: PBE+D optimization, periodic boundary conditions (pbc) Frequency calculation for stationary points, ZPVE
Step 1: Hybrid MP2(cluster):PBE+D(pbc) optimization [Step 2: Basis set extrapolation to CBS limit, single point Step 3: CCSD(T)-MP2, small cluster model
Tuma, Sauer, CPL 2004, 387, 388; PCCP, 2006, 8, 3955!Kerber, Sierka, Sauer, J. Comput. Chem. 2008, 29, 2088!Reuter/Scheffler, PRL 98 (2007) 176103 (CO/Cu(111)) !
Stoll, JPC A 113 (2009) 11483 (Be, Mg crystals)!
Hybrid MP2(cluster):PBE+D(pbc) +ΔCCSD(T) method!
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
Energy as functional of orbitals or electron density! kinet. e-n e-e e-e! en. attract Coulomb exchange/corr ! orbital density density !!!EHF = ET + EN + EJ + EX
Fock30 (orbital)!!
EDFT = ET + EN + EJ + EXC (density)!functional of density only!EXC
LDA = EXDirac30 + EC
VWN!
functional also of density gradient (Generalized Gradient Approximation)!EXC
BLYP = EXDirac30 + �EX
B88 + ECLYP!
Self-interaction cancels
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
12 ρ(x1) 1r12∫∫ ρ(x2 )dx1dx2 − 1
2 i*(x1) j∗(x2 )∫∫ 1
r12j (x1)i (x2 )dx1dx2
i, j∑ρ(x) =
i(x)i=1
N
∑ i*(x)
Coulomb and exchange terms cancel - self-interaction correction (SIC)!
Self-interaction correction!Hartree-Fock EJ + EX
F30 (orbital)
12 ij ij⎡⎣i, j∑ − ij ji ⎤⎦
i = j
Kohn-Sham ! EJ + EXC (density)!12 ρ(x1) 1r12∫∫ ρ(x2 )dx1dx2 + dxρ(x)VXC ρ,∇ρ[ ]∫
12 ii ii + i VXC ρ,∇ρ[ ] i ≠ 0
Coulomb and exchange do not cancel - self-interaction error!
* i*(x1) j∗(x2 )∫∫ 1
r12i (x1) j (x2 )dx1dx2 = ij ij
ii ii⎡⎣ − ii ii ⎤⎦ = 0
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
kinet. e-n e-e e-e! en. attract Coulomb exchange/corr ! orbital density density !!!EHF = ET + EN + EJ + EX
Fock30 (orbital)!!
EDFT = ET + EN + EJ + EXC (density)!functional of density only!EXC
LDA = EXD30 + EC
VWN!
functional also of density gradient (Generalized Gradient Approximation)!EXC
BLYP = EXDirac30 + �EX
B88 + ECLYP!
orbital-density hybrid functional!EXC
B3LYP = a0 EXF30 + (1- a0) EX
D30 + aX �EXB88 !
! +(1- aC ) ECVWN + aC EC
LYP!
Energy as functional of orbitals or electron density!
Self-interaction cancels
Self-interaction cancels partially
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
SOMO
20% 0% 50% !Fock-exchange in functional!
Cluster anions (V2O5)n-!
Size-dependent electron localization
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
V6O15- !
Cs- 2A�!-10!
C2v- 2A2!- 9!
- 48 kJ/mol !
BH-LYP!CCSD(T)//BH-LYP!B3-LYP!
- 57 kJ/mol !
Cs- 2A��!
D2d- 2B1!
Cs- 2A��!
V4O10- !
+ 33!
CCSD(T) calculations confirm most stable structures!
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
self-trapped electron hole
[AlO4•]
[AlO4-]
[SiO4•]+
[SiO4]
The hole is localized at one O site (EPR �-quartz)
electron hole
SiO2 Al doped SiO2
[AlO3•OH]+
[AlO3OH] -H+
-H+
- e-
H-Zeolite
- e- - e-
Electron hole defects in silica and zeolites
Solans-Monfort, Branchadell, Sodupe, Sierka, Sauer, J Chem Phys 131 (2004) 6034!
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
Embedded MFI models (5T, 25T) - QM-Pot!
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
Energy for electron hole creation (eV)!
BHLYP:Pot.fct.! 5T! 25T//5T! Diff.!
Hybrid! 7.40! 7.61!QM//Hybrid! 9.26! 8.81! -0.45!LR//Hybrid! -1.86! -1.20! +0.66!f·LR//Hybrid! (-1.27)! -0.82! (+0.45)!corrected! (7.99)! 7.99!+aperiodic corr.! 8.33!
f=0.682
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
Systematic error of BHLYP (eV)!
6-31++G(d,p)! cc-pVQZ!
BHLYP, {T5}MFI! 9.26!
BHLYP, T1// {T5}MFI! 9.47!
CCSD(T), T1// {T5}MFI! 9.60! 9.91-10.02!
Increment! 0.44-0.55!
© Joachim Sauer, HU Berlin, 2012
Expected rage of IP (eV)!
5T// {25T}MFI!
BHLYP//Hybrid! 8.81! 8.81!LR//Hybrid! -1.20! -0.82!Hybrid! 7.61! 7.99!+ aperiodic corr.! 7.95! 8.33!+ QM error! 0.44! 0.55![AlO3
•OH]+! 8.4! 8.9![SiO2
•]+! 9.2! 9.5!
Valence band edge (SiO2): 10.2 - 10.6 eV!
Solans-Monfort, Branchadell, Sodupe, Sierka, Sauer, J Chem Phys 131 (2004) 6034!