+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Quantum Field Theory, Personhood, and the Trinity: … Field Theory, Personhood, and the Trinity:...

Quantum Field Theory, Personhood, and the Trinity: … Field Theory, Personhood, and the Trinity:...

Date post: 17-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: lamdien
View: 218 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
31
Quantum Field Theory, Personhood, and the Trinity: Echoes and Resonances Arnold E. Sikkema Past President, CSCA Professor of Physics, TWU ASA 2107: Exploring New Heights for Science & Stewardship Golden, CO 30 July 2017, 4:45pm
Transcript

Quantum Field Theory,

Personhood, and the Trinity:

Echoes and Resonances

Arnold E. Sikkema

Past President, CSCA

Professor of Physics, TWU

ASA 2107: Exploring New Heights

for Science & Stewardship

Golden, CO – 30 July 2017, 4:45pm

Things and Relations

“For an interaction to be real, the ‘nature’ of the related things must derive from these relations, while at the same time the relations must derive from the ‘nature’ of the things.” (p. 95)

Bantam, 1984

Chemist

Ilya Prigogine

Philosopher

Isabelle Stengers

nndb.com

sts2016bcn.org

Things and Relations

“For an interaction to be real, the ‘nature’ of the related things must derive from these relations, while at the same time the relations must derive from the ‘nature’ of the things.” (p. 95)

John Zizioulas considers this an echo of Patristic ontology. “Relational Ontology: Insights

from Patristic Thought,” in John Polkinghorne (ed.), The Trinity and an Entangled World (Eerdmans, 2010), p. 152.Bantam, 1984

Eurokinissi, Creative Commons

Colin Gunton: A Universe of

Dynamic Relations

“modern field theory…has led…to theconceptual echo of trinitarian theology inrelativity theory and its developments…”(p. 151)

“the physics of relativity…introduces a dynamism into the way things are conceived. There are no unchanging substances which enter into relations –as on the view of Aristotle and Newton alike – but the whole universe becomes conceivable as a dynamic structure of fields of force in mutually constitutive relations…” (pp. 152f.)

faith-theology.com

T&T Clark, 1997

Thomas F. Torrance on Perichoresis

“mutual indwelling of the Father and the

Son and the Spirit” (p. 102)

peri: about or around

chora: space or room, or chorein: contain,

make room, or go forwardmoltmanniac.com T&T Clark, 1996

Thomas F. Torrance on Perichoresis

“onto-relational concept of the divine

Persons, or an understanding of the three

divine Persons in the one God in which

the ontic relations between them belong

to what they essentially are in

themselves… Along with this there

developed…the new concept of person…the

relations between persons belong to what

persons are.” (p. 102)

moltmanniac.com T&T Clark, 1996

Thomas F. Torrance on Perichoresis

“The patristic concept of perichoresis [expresses] something of the

mystery of the Holy Trinity in respect of the coinherent way in

which the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit exist in one another

and dwell in one another as one God, three Persons.” (p. 168)

John’s gospel: “I am in the Father and the Father in me”

“perichoresis has essentially a dynamic and not a static sense, with the

meaning of mutual indwelling and inter-penetrating one another

in [an] onto-relational, spiritual and intensely personal way.” (p.

171)

Quantum Field Theory

quantum mechanics + special relativity

the vacuum: a background “sea”

its excitations are “particles”

interaction: mediating particles

The First Feynman Diagram: QED

“Space-Time Approach to Quantum

Electrodynamics,” Physical Review 76 (1949) 769.

Richard Feynmanaps.org

Quantum Field Theory

What is an Electron?

Quantum Field Theory

What is an Electron?

Quantum Field Theory

What is an Electron?

God – law – thing

God – lawful thing

Thing and Law

are entangled

Torrance on Maxwell on Faraday

Thomas F. Torrance, Transformation and Convergence in the Frame of

Knowledge (Eerdmans, 1984): Ch. 6, “Christian Faith and Physical

Science in the Thought of James Clerk Maxwell.”

Maxwell saw that for Faraday “lines of force belonging to bodies

were in some sense part of them.” (p. 228)

aip.org

Torrance on Maxwell…

“[Maxwell] claimed, ‘in a scientific point of view the relation is the

most important thing to know’… Relations…belong to reality as

much as things do, for the inter-relations of things are, in part at

least, constitutive of what they are. Being-constituting relations of

this kind we may well speak of as ‘onto-relations’.” (p. 230)

Torrance on Maxwell…

“In the Reformed theological tradition the notion of the person is held

to be controlled by the person-constituting and person-intensifying

activity of God in the Incarnation, such that union with Christ becomes

the ground for interpersonal relations in the Church. Relations between

persons have ontological force and are part of what persons are as

persons – they are real, person-constituting relations. That was the

theology underlying Clerk Maxwell’s concept of union with Christ and of

inter-personal relations in Christ, which it was not his nature to isolate in

some compartmentalised way from his understanding of real, ontological

relations in the physical universe.” (p. 230)

The Field Notion and Christianity

“[For Maxwell,] central to the biblical understanding of the person is the reality of human relationships as an integral part of whatpersons really are. You as a person are not an isolated individual, like the Newtonian particle separated from other autonomous particles [but] are interrelated with others, your parents, your friends, even people with whom you disagree. These interrelationships constitute the very stuff of personal being…. This deep appreciation led to Maxwell’s development of the electromagnetic field in order to describe particles as never separable from their interactions.”

W. Jim Neidhardt, Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 41:3 (Sep. 1989) 137-142. [emphasis in original]

Quantum Field Theory

What is an Electron?

God – lawful thing

Thing and Law

are entangled

Divine and Human Agency

Lawfulness is integral to thingness

A multi-aspectual world

Quantitative Amount

Spatial Continuous extension

Kinematic Movement

Physical Interaction

Biotic Generation

Sensitive Feeling

Analytical Distinction

Cultural Formative power; creativity

Lingual Symbolic meaning

Social Social interaction

Economic Resource use

Aesthetic Harmony

Juridical What is due

Ethical Self-giving love

Credal Vision, commitmentFor much more on this, see

kgsvr.net/dooy

A multi-

aspectual

world

Divine and Human Agency

Lawfulness is integral to thingness

A multi-aspectual world

So, is agency…

Top-down?

Bottom-up?

Coherent!

Simmons on Entanglement & Perichoresis

Fortress Press, 2014

Quantum Entanglement

adapted from blogs.umass.edu/Techbytes/2016/10/18/quantum-computing

↑ ↓ − ↓ ↑

Simmons on Entanglement & Perichoresis

“Everything is interconnected at the

subatomic level.” (p. 147)

“Particles that are once interrelated can never

be fully separated; so too the mutually

indwelling activity of the Trinity can never be

dismembered.” (p. 144)

Fortress Press, 2014

Simmons on Entanglement & Perichoresis

“Perichoresis as entanglement can be

understood as the energy of the divine Trinity

through which the creation is expressed. The

immanent Trinity exists in superposition with

the economic Trinity and evolves within the

entangled life of God with the creation, thus

supporting a panentheistic model of God.”

(p. 144)

Fortress Press, 2014

A prayer of Maxwell

“Almighty God, who hast created man in Thine own

image, and made him a living soul that he might seek

after Thee and have dominion over Thy creatures, teach us to

study the works of Thy hands that we may subdue the earth to

our use, and strengthen our reason for Thy service; and so to

receive Thy blessed Word, that we may believe on Him whom

Thou hast sent to give us knowledge of salvation and the

remission of our sins. All which we ask in the name of the same

Jesus Christ our Lord.”


Recommended