Quarterly Pensions, Benefits and Executive Compensation group presentationOther Post-Employment Benefits (OPEBs)
December 6, 2016Dentons AcademyVANCOUVER
2
3
4
Beyond the numbers, a fractal is a striking mathematical pattern which repeats in ever smaller scales.
OPEBs – Weathering the Climate Change
Nick Gubbay, FCIA, FFA
December 6, 2016
Today’s objectives
The context for OPEBs
Who wants what
The reaction
Valuation (and other) considerations
6
Some jargon!
Other post-employment benefits (OPEBs)
Non-pension post-retirement benefits (PRBs)
Retiree benefits
Post-employment benefits
Today we’re focusing on non-pension benefits that are paid after retirement
Extended health, dental and life insurance benefits
Not lump-sums paid at termination of employment
7
8
Government, public sector agree on changes to retiree health benefits
Will you have enough money to cover health care bills in retirement?
Total health care
spending … $211B in
2013 … $5,988 per
person.
GM Canada wrong to cut
retirees’ benefits, court rules
Health insurance benefits for retirees are worth the costs
Retiree benefits for Ontario civil servants being cut
OPEBs – the context
Health spending as a share of GDP has trended upward over the last 40 years
6%
7%
8%
9%
10%
11%
12%
8.0%
9.5%9.4%
11.6%
© Canadian Institute for Health Information, 2015.
9
SourcesNational Health Expenditure Database, CIHI; Statistics Canada; The Conference Board of Canada.
OPEBs – the context
Trends in public and private health spending
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
$160
$180
Public sector Private sector
Billi
ons o
f dol
lars
© Canadian Institute for Health Information, 2015.
10
SourceNational Health Expenditure Database, CIHI.
OPEBs – the context
OPEBs – the context
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
Long Term Government of Canada Bond Yields
11
Source: Canadian Human Mortality Database
OPEBs – the context
12
What everyone wants
13
Plan Member Wants
Financial security
Comfort of having health
insurance
Ability to retire when
desired
Plan Sponsor Wants
Financial security
Predictability or control
over expenses
Ability to attract and
retain talent
The challenge with that …
14
• Utilization and inflation• Longevity• New technologies • Government programs
EXTERNAL Influences
•Plan provisions•Plan eligibility•Plan duration• Funding
INTERNAL Influences - SPONSOR
• Lifestyle•Utilization•Cost education
INTERNAL Influences -
MEMBER
Traditional Plan for Life/to 65
Reduced Traditional Plan
HSA + Catastrophic
Facilitated Group Product
HSA
Retiree Pay-All Plan
Defined Contribution
Traditional Plans
NewerPlans
Newest Potential
PAYER FACILITATOR
The reaction - single employer plans
15
The reaction - individual plans
Traditional plans, covering suite of services
Various reimbursement rates and maximums
Comparison to group plans Low annual maximums Low lifetime maximums High premiums
Some recent market developments
16
The reaction - multi-employer plans
Significant demand for retiree benefits
Negotiated-cost environment Trustees have flexibility to change benefits
Clear communication is important
Reserving Test the sustainability
Funding
17
Valuation (and other) considerations
Different ways to measure cost Depends on user Depends on purpose
1. Annual cost (cash) i.e. $2,000 per person per year
2. Lifetime cost (PV)
PV$ $2,000 $2,000$
ValuationDate
1 year 2 years n years
…
…
Discounting
18
Valuation (and other) considerations
Sustained low interest rates Lower discount rates mean higher liabilities
Increasing longevity Retirees living longer mean higher liabilities
Eligibility Clearly defined?
Funding Are there any dedicated assets?
19
Valuation (and other) considerations
Provisions Which services, at what reimbursement
Be aware of “cross-subsidies” Contributions not reflective of true costs
Management of High cost drugs Out of country expenses
Uncertainty about future medical costs Sensitivity to key assumptions is important
20
Further questions?
Nick [email protected]
21
About Eckler Ltd. Eckler Ltd. is a leading consulting and actuarial firm with offices across Canada and the Caribbean. Owned and operated by active Principals, the company has earned a reputation for service continuity and high professional standards. Our select group of advisors offers excellence in a wide range of areas, including financial services, pensions, benefits, communications, investment management, pension administration, change management and technology. Eckler Ltd. is also a founding member of Abelica Global – an international alliance of independent actuarial and consulting firms operating in over 20 countries. For more information visit: http://www.eckler.ca.© 2016 Eckler Ltd. All rights reserved
Other Post-EmploymentBenefits (OPEBs)Scott Sweatman, [email protected]+1 604 443 7114
December 6, 2016
• Identifying and Mitigating Legal Risks
• OPEBs: Impact on corporate transactions – mergers and acquisitions
• Funding OPEB promise – Health & Welfare Trusts and Employee Life and Health Trusts
December 6, 2016
Agenda
23
• Two general forms of legal risk when changing/reducing OPEBs1. Changes to OPEB entitlement for existing employees2. Changes to OPEB entitlement for retired employees
December 6, 2016
Legal Risks
24
• Case law in Canada, including recent cases, stand for the following general rules:• Rights to OPEBs can be granted outside of a written employment contract.
Courts look to booklets, letters, communications to determine whether a promise has been made
• The specific Reservation of Rights (“RoR”) language at issue determines an employer’s ability to make changes
• Depending on the terms of the employment contracts and RoR language, it may be possible to change/reduce OPEBs for existing employees with sufficient notice
• Generally, once OPEB entitlement has crystalized on retirement, OPEBs may not be changed, unless an employer has expressly addressed retiree changes in RoR language
December 6, 2016
Legal Risks (cont’d)
25
• Timberwest Forest Corp. v. Gustavson, 2012 BCSC 1232
• Bennett v. British Columbia, 2012 BCCA 115
• Lacy v. Weyerhaeuser Company Limited, 2013 BCCA 252
• O’Neill v. General Motors, 2013 ONSC 4654
• Vivendi Canada Inc. v. Dell’Aniello, 2014 SCC 1
December 6, 2016
Canadian OPEB Case Law
26
• Similar to pension, employment and general HR due diligence before the merger or acquisition, reviewing whether and when post-employment benefit promises were made is crucial exercise
• Who made the promise?
• How was the promise communicated?
• Are you satisfied that the OPEB liability has been properly quantified?
• Consider obtaining a second actuarial/accounting expense opinion.
December 6, 2016
OPEBs – Impact on Corporate Transactions
27
• Consider extent to which OPEB liability can be settled and/or whether vendor or purchaser is on the hook for liability
• Is this an asset or share transaction?
• Does the transaction crystalize a portion of OPEB liabilities for employees who are or will be excluded from successor employer’s operations?
December 6, 2016
OPEBs – Impact on Corporate Transactions
28
• If OPEB liability is significant in relation to purchase price, consider negotiating purchase price offset if settlement of liability or funding isn’t possible
• Can purchaser handle administration of OPEBs post-sale?
• What liability might vendor have if purchaser fails to honour OPEB promises?
December 6, 2016
OPEBs – Impact on Corporate Transactions
29
• Auto sector employers in face of insolvency commenced a class action proceeding against retirees, seeking to reduce OPEBs
• Stakeholders arrived at a Settlement Agreement, which was approved by the Court
• All liabilities for OPEBs ceased as of a certain date
• OPEBs administered through a trust, with individual trustees appointed, and funding secured in part through promissory notes
• Trustees have discretion to reduce benefits if funding levels drop
December 6, 2016
The GM/Chrysler Solution
30
• To fund or not to fund OPEBs?
• Determine whether employer (and unions) have an obligation to pre-fund some or all of the accrued and/or desire OPEB liabilities.
• Employers typically must account for unfunded OPEB liabilities in their financial statements.
• Liabilities can be sizable so if decision is made to address accrued liability, what methods are available?
December 6, 2016 31
OPEBs – Funding the Promise
Health & Welfare Trusts:• Restricted to provide health and welfare benefits (within the parameters
of CRA’s interpretation Bulletin IT-85R2) – disability, medical, dental and group life insurance.
• HWT can not be controlled by funding plan sponsors and cannot make direct investments in plan sponsor entity.
• HWT subject to tax like any other inter vivos trust (highest marginal rate) on its investment income.
• Common for HWTs not to pay tax because trusts are able to deduct taxable benefits paid to beneficiaries.
December 6, 2016 32
OPEBs – Funding the Promise
Heath & Welfare Trusts:• Employer contributions to HWT can be deducted in the year in which
there is a legal obligation to make a payment to the extent that the contribution is reasonable in the circumstances (see Labow v. the Queen, 2011 FCA 305, 2012 DTC 5001)
• CRA has expressed the view that only such portion of employer contributions which are used by the HWT to provide current year benefits would be currently deductible plus reasonable administrative costs of the trust.
• Generally current year contributions are deductible in the year if they were actuarially determined.
December 6, 2016 33
OPEBs – Funding the Promise
Heath & Welfare Trusts:• CAUTION! – where a decision is made to fund an actuarially determined
liability in respect of benefits that are forecasted to be payable in future years (in contrast to contributions used to fund payment of benefits arising from claims made in the year or prior years) employers’ contributions may not be tax deductible.
December 6, 2016 34
OPEBs – Funding the Promise
Employee Life and Health Trusts:• Independent, taxable inter vivos trust to which an employer (or group of
participating employers) contributes in order to provide “designated employee benefits” (“DEBs”) to employees and their dependents.
• DEBs defined in ITA 144.1(1) to include benefits from a group sickness or accident insurance plan, group term life insurance policy or private health services plan – same as HWT benefits!
December 6, 2016 35
OPEBs – Funding the Promise
ELHTs:• Trust must be resident in Canada.
• Level of participation of “key employees” must be limited (e.g. not a tax-deferral vehicle for high income earners or owner-employees).
• No participating employer may have rights under the trust, except right to DEBs if employer is an individual.
• Trust can’t lend to or invest in employer entity.
• Representative of one or more participating employers may not form majority of trustees.
• Trust has legal right to enforce payment of contributions to trust.
December 6, 2016 36
OPEBs – Funding the Promise
ELHTs:• More tax efficient than HWT because HWT is only able to deduct taxable
benefits it pays out, whereas ELHT can deduct all benefits whether taxable or non-taxable to beneficiaries.
• ELHT can also deduct all costs related to provision of DEBs, including insurance premiums, claims, administrative expenses and commissions paid to brokers and investment managers.
December 6, 2016 37
OPEBs – Funding the Promise
ELHTs:• Consider advantages of ITA 144.1(6) for additional relief afforded to
employers who contribute to multi-employer plans in accordance with obligations set out in a collective agreement.
• Employers may deduct in computing its income for a taxation year amounts they are required to contribute to an ELHT if at the time of contribution is made no more than 95% of the employees who are ELHT beneficiaries are employed by a single employer and at least 15 employers will contribute to the trust.
• Contributions to trust under negotiated contribution formula of collective agreement is permissible notwithstanding. financial experience of the trust.
December 6, 2016 38
OPEBs – Funding the Promise
ELHTs:• OPEB liability can be settled either through ongoing employer
(and perhaps employee/retiree contributions) over longer term or, lump sum contributions to fully settle accrued liability in the short term.
• If employer is wishing to settle OPEB liability to improve its financial/balance sheet situation, it should negotiate reduced coverage with actives and perhaps retirees as consideration for securing an otherwise unfunded and unsecured liability.
• Negotiation options include: increased employee/retiree premiums and co-payments, present value (discounted) lump sum payments to retirees or combination so that introduction of ELHT funding is financially realistic for employer’s bottom line.
December 6, 2016 39
OPEBs – Funding the Promise
Thank you
Dentons Canada LLP250 Howe Street20th FloorVancouver, British Columbia V6C 3R8Canada
December 6 2016
Dentons is the world's largest law firm, delivering quality and value to clients around the globe. Dentons is a leader on the Acritas Global Elite Brand Index, a BTI Client Service 30 Award winner and recognized by prominent business and legal publications for its innovations in client service, including founding Nextlaw Labs and the Nextlaw Global Referral Network. Dentons' polycentric approach and world-class talent challenge the status quo to advance client interests in the communities in which we live and work. www.dentons.com© 2016 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. This document is not designed to provide legal or other advice and you should not take, or refrain from taking, action based on its content. We are providing information to you on the basis you agree to keep it confidential. If you give us confidential information but do not instruct or retain us, we may act for another client on any matter to which that confidential information may be relevant. Please see dentons.com for Legal Notices.
#24790477 40