Mitchell | Giurgola Architects. LLPScott Blackwell Page, Facility Programming Consultant

06 February 2006

Queens College Master Plan Amendment

prepared for:The City University of New YorkThe Dormitory Authority of the State of New York

Mitchell | Giurgola Architects. LLPScott Blackwell Page, Facility Programming Consultant

06 February 2006

Key Attributes of the Planning Process

• First Comprehensive Master Plan since 1971

• The Plan has been informed by a deficiencies analysis made by DASNY in 1992 and the Opportunities and Constraints Analysis prepared by M/G in 1998.

• The Plan has been adapted to evolving CUNY policies since that time; in particular, the changes to University growth projections and their impact on physical planning.

• The Plan has been adapted to the evolving mission of the College as defined by three College administrations.

• The Plan has been further informed by extensive interviews with senior administration, deans and department chairs.

Mitchell | Giurgola Architects. LLPScott Blackwell Page, Facility Programming Consultant

06 February 2006

Goals

1. Modernize the existing building stock of 2,341,000 GSF 70% of which is functionally obsolete• Reprogram• Renovate• Adapt to emerging technologies

2. Optimize sizes and relationships among academic departments for greater efficiency and to foster interdisciplinary learning

3. Over time, relocate technologically demanding programs into more contemporary buildings and backfill less sophisticated buildings with less demanding programs

4. Identify Sites for Future Construction to accommodate anticipated shortfall of 178,000 NASF over the long term

5. Provide additional amenities for campus population• Gathering and study places• Decentralized food services• Additional parking

6. Improve Campus Image• Visibility• Access• Orientation• Landscape

Mitchell | Giurgola Architects. LLPScott Blackwell Page, Facility Programming Consultant

06 February 2006

Top: View of Manhattan skyline from the South QuadRight: Queens College Campus Location in New York City

Campus Location

Mitchell | Giurgola Architects. LLPScott Blackwell Page, Facility Programming Consultant

06 February 2006

Campus History

Queens College, c. 1938 Model showing extent of original campus buildings

Mitchell | Giurgola Architects. LLPScott Blackwell Page, Facility Programming Consultant

06 February 2006

Queens College Building Inventory

Mitchell | Giurgola Architects. LLPScott Blackwell Page, Facility Programming Consultant

06 February 2006

Space Assessment Table

SPACE ASSESSMENT

Student FTES 11,539 11,539 12,344 12,772

Space Type Existing

Space

Current Need Space

2003/2004

Projected Need

2009/2010

Projected Need

2014/2015

Projected Deficit or

SurplusInstructional & Departmental Research Classroom & Computer Labs 160,397 sf 171,006 sf 180,797 sf 190,708 sf (30,311) sfArts & Humanities 130,624 sf 116,521 sf 122,510 sf 126,684 sf 3,940 sfEthnic & Area Studies 6,808 sf 15,761 sf 15,761 sf 15,761 sf (8,953) sfMathematics & Sciences 217,732 sf 210,859 sf 223,430 sf 236,058 sf (18,326) sfDivision of Education 32,452 sf 41,398 sf 46,960 sf 54,629 sf (22,177) sfSocial Sciences 51,871 sf 68,526 sf 73,889 sf 79,175 sf (27,304) sfSubtotal Instructional 599,884 sf 624,071 sf 663,347 sf 703,015 sf (103,131) sf

Support Academic Support 18,661 sf 27,569 sf 27,569 sf 28,236 sf (9,575) sfContinuing Education 8,292 sf 13,600 sf 13,600 sf 13,600 sf (5,308) sfSpecial Programs 17,227 sf 25,683 sf 25,683 sf 26,303 sf (9,076) sfLibrary 169,635 sf 144,822 sf 154,925 sf 166,238 sf 3,398 sfPhysical Education 101,526 sf 107,757 sf 107,757 sf 107,757 sf (6,231) sfAssembly & Exhibition 74,727 sf 78,135 sf 78,135 sf 78,135 sf (3,408) sfStudent Faculty Services 135,298 sf 116,000 sf 127,500 sf 128,000 sf 7,298 sfChildren's Development Center 2,169 sf 5,131 sf 5,131 sf 5,616 sf (3,447) sfStudent Services 34,559 sf 44,475 sf 47,578 sf 49,132 sf (14,573) sfAdministration 35,654 sf 41,591 sf 41,591 sf 41,591 sf (5,937) sfTechnology 19,756 sf 30,197 sf 30,197 sf 31,290 sf (11,534) sfCampus Services 78,193 sf 88,320 sf 99,500 sf 106,800 sf (28,607) sfSubtotal Support 695,697 sf 723,280 sf 759,166 sf 782,698 sf (87,000) sf Current Vacant Space 11,424 sf 0 sf 0 sf 0 sf 11,424 sf Total NASF 1,307,005 sf 1,347,351 sf 1,422,513 sf 1,485,713 sf (178,707) sfTOTAL NASF per FTES 113 sf 117 sf 115 sf 116 sf Total GSF (304,400) GSF

Note: Existing NASF based on May 2005 Inventory excludes Temp 3, Modular Buildings and CBNS leased space.

Mitchell | Giurgola Architects. LLPScott Blackwell Page, Facility Programming Consultant

06 February 2006

Benchmarking TableTotal NASF Per FTES

188 sf

166 sf

162 sf

160 sf

159 sf

148 sf

147 sf

146 sf

143 sf

140 sf

137 sf

135 sf

132 sf

131 sf

125 sf

116 sf

114 sf

113 sf

103 sf

100 sf

97 sf

City CollegeStony Brook (without Hospital)

Brockport CollegeSUNY Oneonta

Cortland CollegeUniversity at Albany

SUNY FredoniaBuffalo State College

SUNY PlattsburghPlymouth State University

Lehman CollegeSUNY Geneseo

Western New England CollegeSUNY New Paltz

SUNY BinghamtonQueens College - Projected 2014/2015

Keene State CollegeQueens College - Current

Hunter CollegeEdinboro University

William Paterson

Mitchell | Giurgola Architects. LLPScott Blackwell Page, Facility Programming Consultant

06 February 2006

The Bottom Line

1. A plan for the future that is achievable and affordable

2. A plan that is adaptable to changing priorities over time

3. An implementation strategy that is non-linear and can be accomplished in modest steps

4. A plan that will minimize disruption to campus life as it is being implemented

Mitchell | Giurgola Architects. LLPScott Blackwell Page, Facility Programming Consultant

06 February 2006

Building Conditions Site Plan

Existing to Remain

Minor Rehab & Programming

Major Rehab & Programming

No New Investment

Mitchell | Giurgola Architects. LLPScott Blackwell Page, Facility Programming Consultant

06 February 2006

Queens College: A City Within A City

1. Problematic campus entrance

2. Poorly developed green space

3. Inadequate service and loading area

4. Potential solution for parking shortage

5. Candidates for demolition & sites for future construction

A, B, C Building Zones

D Green Space

E Campus Entrance and Public Face

Mitchell | Giurgola Architects. LLPScott Blackwell Page, Facility Programming Consultant

06 February 2006

Before Renewal After Renewal

Campus Plan Before and After Renewal

Mitchell | Giurgola Architects. LLPScott Blackwell Page, Facility Programming Consultant

06 February 2006

Project Campus Redevelopment Planning Clusters

Mitchell | Giurgola Architects. LLPScott Blackwell Page, Facility Programming Consultant

06 February 2006

Symbiotic Clusters / Program Connectivity

Mitchell | Giurgola Architects. LLPScott Blackwell Page, Facility Programming Consultant

06 February 2006

Symbiotic Clusters / Program Connectivity

Mitchell | Giurgola Architects. LLPScott Blackwell Page, Facility Programming Consultant

06 February 2006

Symbiotic Clusters / Program Connectivity

Mitchell | Giurgola Architects. LLPScott Blackwell Page, Facility Programming Consultant

06 February 2006

Symbiotic Clusters / Program Connectivity

Mitchell | Giurgola Architects. LLPScott Blackwell Page, Facility Programming Consultant

06 February 2006

Symbiotic Clusters / Program Connectivity

Mitchell | Giurgola Architects. LLPScott Blackwell Page, Facility Programming Consultant

06 February 2006

Symbiotic Clusters / Program Connectivity

Mitchell | Giurgola Architects. LLPScott Blackwell Page, Facility Programming Consultant

06 February 2006

The Future: Landscape and Site Improvements

Mitchell | Giurgola Architects. LLPScott Blackwell Page, Facility Programming Consultant

06 February 2006

The Future: Completion of the Long-Term Plan