+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Questions for proponents of theory-driven...

Questions for proponents of theory-driven...

Date post: 27-Jan-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
29
Questions for proponents of theory-driven evaluation 1
Transcript
  • Questions for proponents of theory-drivenevaluation

    1

  • InAppreciation• Focusonuseful/’good’theoryofchange• Learningisaprocessnotjustaproduct• Empiricalbasisforatheoryofchange• Arichervocabularyaroundtheoriesofchange

    – Capabilities,opportunities,motivation– Unpackingtheblack-boxofinterventions

    • Ascienceofcausation– Assumptions,risks,mechanisms– Contributionanalysis

    • Richerdescriptionofhowprogramscanwork• Knowledgetranslationdescription• Highlightsthecomplexityoftheintervention• Stepstowardsprecisionintheorizing

    2

  • GuidingQuestions

    AStoryfromtheWorldHealth

    Organization

    EvaluationofDancingwithParkinson’s

    Summary

    Pushingtheory-drivenevaluations:

    Somequestions

  • Somequestions• Howdoesonetestatheoryofchange?

    • Howdoesonetestalinkofthetheoryofchange?

    • Howdoesonetestkeyassumptions?

    • Whatworksforwhom,underwhatcontexts?

    • Howdoesonetestiftheassumptionswillholdacrosscontexts?

    • Representationchallenges;• Fromrepresentationtotesting• Understandingdiversity

    4

  • ASTORYFROMTHEWORLDHEALTHORGANIZATION:OfMiceandElephant

    5

  • LESSONS

    The importanceof understandingthenatureofconnections Issuesofpower

    Theattribution/contributionproblem

    Theinequityproblem

    6

  • ANEXAMPLEOFAREALISTEVALUATION:EVALUATIONOFDANCINGWITHPARKINSON’S

    7

  • • PDisthesecondmostcommonneurodegenerativedisorderafterAlzheimer’sdisease

    • Causesavarietyofphysicalsymptoms:rigidity,tremor,slownessofmovement,impairedbalance,aswellas“freezing”ortheinabilitytoinitiatemovement

    • Othernon-motorsymptomsinclude:depression,anxiety,cognitiveimpairment,problemsswallowing,chewing,andspeaking,maskedfacialexpressions,fatigue,andsleepdisturbances

    • Thesesymptomsinvariablyleadtoincreasedsocialisolationandlackofengagementwiththeworld

    Parkinson’sdisease(PD)

    8

  • • Danceofferssimilarbenefitsasothermovementforms:focusonbalance,strength,andflexibility

    • Butartisticelementsofdanceaddvaluethatothertypesofexercisedonot

    • ForExample:– Music:rhythmicandemotionalstimulihelpinitiatemovementmoreeasilyforpeoplewithPD

    – Imagery:assistsinfosteringmovementandself-expression– Social:danceislearned,practiced,andenjoyedwithothers

    – Cognitive:newmovementsequences,improvisationexercisesengageandstimulatethemind

    WhyDancewithPD?

    9

  • IndividualswhodancedregularlybeforesymptomsofParkinson’sdisease

    Dancingataloweredcapacityremindsthemofhowtheyhavedeteriorated

    Theyavoidattendingclassesandthereforedon’tgethealthbenefitsofparticipation

    IndividualswhohaveneverdancedregularlybeforeDWP

    Whiledancingtheyexperiencethefeelingoffreedomfromtheirsymptomsandrelieffromstressanddepression

    Theyfeelbetter,haveanincentivetoattendclassesregularly,andthereforegainhealthbenefits

    Individualswholivealone

    Socialconnectionwithotherparticipants,teachersandvolunteers,physicalcontact,andcreativeandemotionalexpression

    Deepenedsocialconnections,enhancedartisticexpression,improvedqualityoflife

    Individualswithcare-partnerorcaregiver

    1+hourthatpersonwithPDisengagedindancinginasafeenvironmentwithotherswithPD

    Enhancedcare-partner/caregiverreliefandsupport

    Context Mechanism Outcome

    10

  • Data:Focusonshorttermvariations,linkagesbetweenDWPandoutcomes,understandingofotherdrivers,temporal

    context,betweenandwithin-individualvariations1.ReversedPre- andPost-surveydesign

    3. NewClientBaselineSurvey+QualitativeLongitudinalResearch

    15WeeksJune22-October4

    EndofSpringClasses SummerBreak StartofAutumnClassesLastweekofJune Julytomid-Sept Mid-September

    2.DailyJournals

    StartofAutumnClassesFrommid-September Followup

    11

  • • AnExampleofaSingleIndividual:– DailyEntries:Howareyoudoingtoday?– Responds“okay”91%ofthetime,“good”5%ofthetime,and“bad”4%ofthejournaldays– Ratesthedayas“okay”evenondayswithsomethingtolookforwardto(e.g.,dinnerwith

    friends,concerts,birthdays)– Notably,3ofthefive“good”dayswereDWPclassdays

    12

  • Jun-24DWP Jun-25 Jul-10 Jul-22DWP Jul-29DWP Aug-8 Aug-11 Aug-27 Sep-9DWP Sep-26

    GOOD“Busy day! Attended my nephew's graduation from law school, had an important business meeting in the PM, and attended a jazz concert in the evening.”

    OK“Had lunch with my best friend. Always cheers my

    spirit.”

    GOOD“Good news from the oncologist - my PSA continues to be low.”

    OK“Looking forward to dinner with 3 of my

    cousins and my brother.”

    OK“My brother took me out to dinner on my birthday. Felt fatigued but otherwise ok.”

    OK“I went to afternoon concert at

    Koerner Hall with friends. Felt tired at the end.”

    OK“Another full day at a

    conference at Harbourfront. Felt

    tremendous fatigue around 4pm.”

    GOOD“Had blood work done in the morning at Princess Margaret Hospital in preparation for my appointment next week with the radiation oncologist.”

    OK“Long day - picked up by a friend who drove us to another friend who was

    having a party at her place in Caledon. Long, long day. Very fatigued.”

    OK“DWP begins today – looking forward.”

    13

  • 14

  • SOMEQUESTIONSFORPROPONENTSOFTHEORY-DRIVENEVALUATION

    15

  • 16

  • 1.Whatisagoodenoughtheoryofchange?

    • “Whatarecharacteristicsofausefulimplementabletheory?Howdoesthetheoryofacomplexinterventiondifferfromatheoryofasimpleintervention?”

    • “…invirtuallyeverycase,thetheoriesofchangethatdrovetheinitiativesandtheirevaluationswerenotreallyadequatetosubstantiatetheconnectionsbetweenactivitiesandoutcomes.”

    – Auspos andKubisch,2004

    17

  • • ““Isittimetoshiftthebalanceinwhatwedefineasqualityfromanexclusivefocusonempiricalmethod(theextenttowhichauthorshaveadheredtotheacceptedrulesofcontrolledtrials)toonethatembracestheory(theextenttowhichatheoreticalmechanismwasexplicitlydefinedandtested)?”

    • Theneedforcasestudieson“whatareusefultheoriesofchange?Whatmakesagoodtheoryofchange?

    18

  • 2) TheExpectationsProblem:TheAnticipatedTrajectoryofImpacts

    • “Fundamentaltojudgingperformanceishavingclearexpectationsofananticipatedtrajectoryofimpactofprogrammes (Woolcock,2009).Itisnotentirelyclearhowtheknowledgeofsuchatrajectoryofimpactsisarrivedat,especiallyforcomplexinterventions.”

    • Howdoesonedevelopaclearunderstandingoftheanticipatedtrajectoryofimpacts?

    19

  • 20

  • • “Evenacursoryreadingofsocialtheory,forexample,wouldsuggestthatinfactthemostlikelyshapeofsuchprojects’functionalformisaJ-curve(thatis,thingsgetworsebeforethey–hopefully,maybe– getbetter)orastepfunction(thatis,longperiodsofstasisfollowedbyasuddenrupturebroughtonby,say,anelectionorthereachingofa‘tippingpoint’intheadoptionofanewfertilizertechnology,inwhichprevailingnormsand/oruptakebyaninfluentiallocalleaderrapidlyleadsotherstodolikewise).”

    21

  • • “Inshort,thedevelopmentprofessionstronglypreferstosellknown,universalsolutionswithhigh,immediateandreadilymeasurableimpactratherthanwrestlewithambiguous,context-specificproblemsthatmaynothave(atleastexante)aknownorevenknowablesolution.“

    22

  • 3) TheKnowledgeTranslationProblem

    • Howdoesaprogrambuildknowledgeofwhatworksforwhom?

    • “Whatprogrammemechanismsareneededforwhatcontexts?Theevaluationexplorationinourviewshouldnotberestrictedtotheimpactevaluationquestion(whatworksforwhom?)butalsoshouldbefocusedontheknowledgetranslationquestion:whatshouldworkforwhom?”

    23

  • • Howissuchknowledgeofheterogeneousmechanismsimplementedinprograms?

    • Howdoweincorporateknowledgeofsuchheterogeneityintoourtheoriesofchange?

    24

  • 4)TheMethodsProblem:DevelopinganEcologyofEvidence

    • Aproblemthatalsocomesthroughreasonablyclearlyintherecentliteratureonevaluationmethodsistherecognitionthat‘learningisnotthemonopolyofasinglemethod’(Rodrik,2009).

    • Thelessonincreasinglyisonthetypesofevidencethatareusefulgiventheheterogeneousnatureoftherealworld/complexsystems.

    – ForexampleRodrik (2008:5)makesthisimportantpoint:“The‘hardevidence’fromtherandomizedevaluationhastobesupplementedwithlotsofsoftevidencebeforeitbecomesusable.”

    25

  • • Forthemostpartthetheory-drivenevaluationfieldhasnotfullyengagedwithmethodsthatcanhelpexplicatetheprogrammetheorymorefully,norhasitclearlydescribedhowmethodscanbeusedtotestlinkagesintheprogrammetheory.

    26

  • Someexamplesofmethods• NetworkAnalysis Howdoestheprogrammeoperationalize networksof

    interventions?

    • EventStructureAnalysis Whatistheimpactoftheeventstructure(forexample,theinteractionsbetweenpartneringorganisations)onoutcomesovertime?

    • ConceptMapping Howdodifferentgroupsofstakeholdersconceptualisetheintervention?Dotheseconceptualisations changeovertime?

    • SystemDynamics Whataretheanticipatedtrajectoriesoftheimpactsoftheoverallpolicyintervention?Howwouldchangingkeycomponentsofthepolicyinterventionaltertheexpectedtrajectoryofoutcomes?

    27

  • • ObservationalStudies(Propensityscoringtechniques) Intheabsenceofrandomizeddesigns,whatalternativeanalyticaltechniquescanhelpassesscausaleffectsofinterventions?Whatisthehiddenbiasinobservationalstudies?

    • MethodsofDevelopmentalTrajectoriesDoesthesameinterventionhaveverydifferentimpactsovertimefordifferentgroupsofindividuals(orcommunities)?

    • Respondent-DrivenSampling Howdoestheprogramme(andevaluation)reachindividualswhoarehardtoreachandnotfoundinastandardsamplingframe?

    • Adaptive/SequentialDesigns Howcanadesignhelpaninterventionadapt/evolvefromlargecomplexitywithmanycomponentstoaninterventionwithafew‘effective’components?

    • RealistSynthesis Howdoesevidencesynthesishelpidentifythemechanismsbywhichaninterventionworks?

    28

  • 29

    Summary

    Theneedforcasestudies

    Utilityfromtheuserperspective

    Generativecausation

    Improvedlanguage HeterogeneousImpacts:ConnectAssumptionsto

    Contexts

    TestableAssumptions

    Prioritization

    MethodologicalImplications


Recommended