+ All Categories
Home > Documents > R. Kass DPF_Santa Cruz 11 Richard Kass on behalf of the DBM group August 16, 2013 The ATLAS Diamond...

R. Kass DPF_Santa Cruz 11 Richard Kass on behalf of the DBM group August 16, 2013 The ATLAS Diamond...

Date post: 11-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: camilla-daniela-stevens
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
3
Charge Collection in CVD Diamond R. Kass DPF Santa Cruz 24
Transcript
Page 1: R. Kass DPF_Santa Cruz 11 Richard Kass on behalf of the DBM group August 16, 2013 The ATLAS Diamond Beam Monitor Outline of Talk Motivation The ATLAS DBM.

Charge Collection in CVD Diamond

R. KassDPF Santa Cruz 24

Page 2: R. Kass DPF_Santa Cruz 11 Richard Kass on behalf of the DBM group August 16, 2013 The ATLAS Diamond Beam Monitor Outline of Talk Motivation The ATLAS DBM.

R. Kass 26

Radiation Damage - Basics

Charge trapping the only relevant radiation damage effect NIEL scaling questionable a priori

Egap in diamond 5 times larger than in Si

Many processes freeze out

Typical emission times order of months

Like Si at 300/5 = 60 K – Boltzmann factor

A rich source of effects and (experimental) surprises !

Radiation induced effect

DiamondOperational consequence

SiliconOperational consequence

Leakage current

small &

decreasesnone

I/V = αΦ

α ~ 4x10-17 A/cm

Heating

Thermal runaway

Space charge ~ none noneΔNeff ≈ -βΦ

β ~ 0.015 cm-1

Increase of full depletion

voltage

Charge trapping

YesCharge loss

Polarization

1/τeff = βΦ

β ~ 5-7x10-16 cm2/ns

Charge loss

Polarization

t

thttteff

vPN

)1(1

DPF Santa Cruz

Page 3: R. Kass DPF_Santa Cruz 11 Richard Kass on behalf of the DBM group August 16, 2013 The ATLAS Diamond Beam Monitor Outline of Talk Motivation The ATLAS DBM.

Summary of RD42 Test Beam Resultsfor CVD Diamond

R. KassDPF Santa Cruz 27

Particle Energy Relative k

p 24GeV 1.0

800MeV 1.6-1.8

70MeV 2.5-2.8

25MeV 4.0-5.0

π 200MeV 2.5-3.0

k is relative damage constant


Recommended