Date post: | 25-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | allison-perry |
View: | 229 times |
Download: | 0 times |
R. Neil RodgersNASA Enterprise Applications Competency Center (NEACC)
NASA’s Strategic RoadmapLeading to Enhancements
in Agency Business Systems
Prime Directive, circa 2000
Standard business processes Consistent, reliable, and timely information Agencywide visibility of information Cross functional integration Platform for evolving business process improvements Enabler for shared business services
...reengineer NASA’s business processes in the context of industry “best practices” ...reengineer NASA’s business processes in the context of industry “best practices”
and implement enabling technology to provide necessary management information and implement enabling technology to provide necessary management information
to support the Agency’s Mission.to support the Agency’s Mission.
...reengineer NASA’s business processes in the context of industry “best practices” ...reengineer NASA’s business processes in the context of industry “best practices”
and implement enabling technology to provide necessary management information and implement enabling technology to provide necessary management information
to support the Agency’s Mission.to support the Agency’s Mission.
PROCUREMENT
Consolidated procurement for cost reduction
Increased competition through E-Commerce
INTEGRATED FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Consistent and timely financial, procurement and Program data
Integrated budget planning and execution
Full Cost management
HUMAN RESOURCESCompetencies and skills
managed to meet strategic needs
Workforce deployment integral to Program/Project needs
INTEGRATED ASSETMANAGEMENT / PROJECT
SYSTEMS Zero inventories with
shortened supply chain Close coordination of
material plans with project plans
Shorter project timelines
Life Cycle Maintenance
Supplier
Collaborative Partnerships
InfrastructurePrograms & Projects
Accurate, timely, consistent information
Optimize assets across CentersFull utilization of employee
capabilitySeamlessly manage multi-
Center programs
MSFC
JSC
ARC
GRCDFRC
LARC
KSC
SSC
HQGSFC
The ERP Vision
Supply Chain Management
The Plan of Attack
Integrated Asset Management (PP&E)
Phase 1 Phase 2Recruitment One-Stop
Agency Labor Distribution
Travel Mgr BlueprintingFormulation
FY2000
Budget FormulationRel .5B
NBS Mods
Rel 1 HQFormulation & Blueprint
Contract Management Formulation Implementation
Core Finance
Erasmus
Position Mgmt
Resume Mgmt
ePayroll Formulate
SAP Version Update Formulate
Financial / BudgetingFinancial / Budgeting
Contract / ProcurementContract / Procurement
Asset ManagementAsset Management
Human CapitalHuman Capital
Information DeliveryInformation Delivery
CompletedCompleted
PlannedPlanned
Implement
Formulate Impl
Project Mgmt Information Improvement Impl
eTraveleTravelVendor
Selection Formulation
Planning
Aircraft Management Planning Phase 1 Phase 2(mid-FY09)
ImplementForm
Human Capital Information Environment Planning
thru FY09)
Formulation
Implement
Phased Implementation
Formulation Implement
Implement
ImplementationFormulation
Implementation
Formulation Implementation Rollout
Implement
Formulate
FY2001 FY2002 FY2003 FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008
ProgramSunset2009
What We Did Well
Established clear governance structure with strong executive sponsorship
Single instance strategy Integrated right mix of NASA subject matter expertise
and consultants Focused on rigorous project management Established central integration team and enterprise
application integration strategy Planned and implemented business intelligence strategy
along with transactional system deployment Planned for long term sustaining support early in the
project
Project Management Approaches—
Then and Now
Original Software Implementation Process
Gather Requirements Build Test & Deploy
Blueprint / Design
Formulation
• Customer• Business Analyst
• Business Analyst• Software experts• Partial Development Team
Realization
• Business Analyst• Software experts
• Developers• Configurers• Security
Test Go-Live
Testers Customer
Focus is on sequential (non-overlapping) phases ‘Teams’ divided up into areas of expertise to accommodate phases Each ‘team’ hands its work off to the others Limited interaction with customer
“Don’t talk to the customer now. They might change a requirement”
Agile Process:Iterative Feedback Improves Application Delivery
Monthly Sprint Reviews Users, Stakeholders participate
Product Owner manages and prioritizes the wish list. Also verifies that deliverables are as expected
Team delivers product in stages, with plenty of feedback along the way
2 3
1
Sprint 1
Oops! THAT’s not really what we’d envisioned. Let’s revector
Sprint 2
Sprint 3 - 10
Team gets feedback
ProductIteration 1
Team gets feedback
Team gets feedback By the final sprint, the
full system is implemented as envisioned
4
ProductIteration 2
Getting closer. At least it has 4 sides!
84/26/2010
Real Property Management (RPM) ProjectRequirements Traceability Example
Epic 1.1: Create and Maintain Real Property Records for Land and Facilities
Epic 1.3: Report and Analyze Real Property System Data
Theme 1.0: Track and Manage Real Property Assets
User Story 1.1.4As a Real Property Accountable Officer (RPAO), I want the ability to change, revise and update property information
User Story 1.1.9As an HQ Admin user, I have the ability to add new property for any center
User Story 1.3.10As a Real Property Management (RPM) user, I want to access RPM data and historical real property data via a flexible reporting tool such as BW
User Story 1.3.5As a Headquarters User, I want the ability to track and report deferred maintenance cost
Conditions of SatisfactionVerify that an RPAO can change a new real property assetVerify that an RPAO can revise attributes on a real property assetVerify that an RPAO can update a real property asset
Conditions of SatisfactionVerify that an HQ Admin user can create new property for any centerVerify than an HQ Admin user can change new property for any center
Conditions of SatisfactionVerify that the RPAO can execute a current RPM report in the report selection screenVerify that the RPAO can view RPM data from the Real Property card on a BW reportVerify that the RPAO can execute a heritage RPM report in the report selection screenVerify that the RPAO can view historical RPM data on a BW report
Conditions of SatisfactionVerify that an HQ user can view deferred maintenance costs on the Real Property CardVerify that an HQ user can upload deferred maintenance costs to the RPM system from the agency external source (e.g., excel spreadsheet)Verify that an HQ user can run an ad hoc report for deferred maintenance costs
Project Themes, Epics, and User Stories will be formally managed in the HP Quality Center requirements module, and Conditions of Satisfaction will be mapped to Test Plans.
94/26/2010
RPM Project Schedule
Page 10
NovOctSepAugJulMay JunAprMarFebJanDecNovOctSepAug
TRR-18/2
ORRTBD*
Center ORRsTBD*
TRR-29/7
SIT 1
Solution Design & Development (Scrum Approach)
Re-Key
SIT 2
FY10FY09
Formulation
Sprint -1
11.1 Go Live~ 10/1/2010
Testing Stabilization
Cutover9/25 – 9/30
Sprint 0
FY11
Sprint 1 Sprint 2 Sprint 3 Sprint 4 Sprint 5
9/14 10/8 11/10 12/11 1/6 2/2 3/2 3/30
Sprint 6 Sprint 7 Sprint 8 Sprint 9 Sprint 10 R
4/23 5/25 6/22 7/20
KDP-C10/22
NAR Assessment10/15
CDR4/15
PDR10/20
KDP-E9/23
EAPR10/8
Sprint Reviews = RPM Lifecycle Reviews = Readiness Reviews =
Mock 1 Mock 2 Mock 3 Mock 4 Mock 5 Mock 6
Onsite Center SME Support
PCR~ 12/1
Communications & Change Mgmt
*TBD dates based on NEACC 11.1 Release Planning
Mock 7
Sprint 11 (Release Sprint)
Mock 8 Mock 9
Mock Data Conversion
8/2
8/3 8/31 9/8 9/24
Business Intelligence (BI)
Enterprise Business IntelligenceCirca 2003
124/26/2010
Today
134/26/2010
Enterprise Application Integration
Pathfinder (2003)
154/26/2010
NEACC Enterprise Services - Today
164/26/2010
Usage and Statistics
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
Services
Web Services: 65 ESB Services: 102 Integrated Systems: > 80
Metrics
Avg Daily Clients: > 20k Avg Daily ESB Txns: > 40k Peak Daily ESB Txns: > 300k
Web Stack
Services
• Applications: 40
• Reusable Bundles: 185
• Framework Services: 25
Metrics
• Avg Daily Requests: > 80k
• Peak Daily Requests: > 120k
174/26/2010
The Path Forward
Business Systems Strategic Roadmap Objective/Expectation
Establish a 3-5 year vision as well as a 1 year plan by the beginning of each Fiscal Year
Quarterly progress updates to discuss formal commitments made to each community
Promote cross functional understanding of the business priorities in order to develop an integrated roadmap
Utilize roadmap to…»drive budget requests»demand management approach»application consolidation
19
Functional Area
Level Of Effort
Roadmap Development Considerations
20
Timeframe
Driver
Benefit
Priority
Impacted Areas
Implementation Lead; Partner; Stakeholder
Initiative
Questions
4/26/2010 21