Arab Journal of Nuclear Science and Applications, 46(3), (153-166) 2013
153
Radiative Transfer Problem in two Concentric Spheres with Reflective
Boundary Conditions and internal Source
S. El-Konsol, A.S. Sabbah*, A. Elghazaly and M. Hosni
Reactor &Neutron Physics Department, Nuclear Research Center, Atomic Energy Authority, Cairo, Egypt.
* Mathematical Department, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
Received: 20/6/2011 Accepted: 29/8/2011
ABSTRACT
Radiation transfer problem for anisotropic scattering in a spherical
homogeneous, turbid medium with angular dependent (specular) and diffuse
reflecting boundaries is considered. The solution of the problem containing an
energy source in a medium of specular and diffuse reflecting boundaries is given in
terms of the solution of the source-free problem. The angular dependent reflectivity
of the boundary is considered as Fresnel’s reflection probability function. The
source-free problem is solved by using the Pomraning-Eddington approximation.
Two different weight functions are used to find the solution constants. The partial
heat fluxes at the boundaries of solid sphere and spherical shell of transparent and
reflecting boundaries are calculated. The calculations are carried out for various
values of refractive index and different radii. The results are compared with those
of the Galerkin technique.
Key Words: Radiative Transfer / homogeneous spherical shell Medium / Heat Flux/ Pomraning-
Eddington /Sspecular Reflecting/ anisotropic scattering.
INTRODUCTION
The radiative transfer through a spherical, participating medium has numerous applications in
engineering and space science. In most radiative transfer problem, the angular variation of the
reflectivities for spherical medium is neglected and the interfaces are usually assumed to have constant
reflectivities. Few works have taken into consideration the direction–dependent reflectivities. (1-7) Also,
the radiative transfer through a spherical shell medium can be calculated with the use of different
methods.( 8-11) The case in which the spherical medium has boundaries that emit and reflect radiation
and contains an energy source has mathematical complexity.
In this work, we find the solution of radiative transfer through a spherical medium with
specular and diffuse reflecting boundaries and energy source in terms of the solution of the source-free
problem. The Pomraning-Eddington approximation(12-14) is used to solve the source-free problem. The
constants of the solution are calculated by using weight functions technique. The partial heat fluxes at
the boundaries of solid sphere and spherical shells of transparent and reflecting boundaries are
calculated. The angular dependent reflectivity of the boundary is taken as Fresnel’s reflection
probability function. The calculations are compared with those given by the Galerkin technique(10).
THEORETICAL TECHNIQUE
Consider the radiative transfer equation through an absorbing, emitting, anisotropically scattering,
and homogeneous, medium. This medium occupies the region between two concentric spheres of inner
radius R1 and outer radius R2. The radiation problem with internal source is formulated mathematically
by the equation (15)
Arab Journal of Nuclear Science and Applications, 46(3), (153-166) 2013
154
1
1
0
2
),(,,2
,11
rQrIpdrI
rr (1)
Where R1 r R2 and -1 μ 1,
subject to diffuse and specular boundary conditions
),-(R )n,( )(Rq2)(TI ),( 111111b11 IRIsd
(2a)
),(R )n,( )(Rq2)(TI ),( 222222b22 IRIsd
(2b)
Here ),( rI is the radiance at optical distance r, while is the cosine of the angle between the
propagation direction and the positive direction of the r-axis. The single scattering albedo is taken as
0 while P (,’) is the scattering phase function which can be expanded in terms of the Legendre
polynomial Pn() as (16)
0
)()(),(n
nnn ppap 10 a (3a)
The expansion coefficients an can be calculated by Mie scattering theory(12) using the refractive index
η and the size parameter of the particles x of the medium. (10) For a linear anisotropic approximation
this phase function can be stated as
ap 1),( (3b)
Where a is given by (12)
])!1(!2[])!2()1[(2
12
0
mmmaam
m
m
m
),( rQ is an internal energy source which may be considered as )]([)1( 0 rTIb , where )(rT is
the temperature distribution of the medium. ,iiand where 1i and 2,are the emissivities and
diffuse reflectivities of the inner and outer surfaces, respectively, and are related by ii 1 .
)( ib TI is the black-body radiation where 21andTT are the temperatures of the inner and outer surfaces,
respectively. in addition ),( i
sn are the specular reflectivities at the boundaries which are
dependent upon the refractive indices, and 1n and 2n are the relative refractive indices of the inner
and outer surfaces, respectively.
n
n - S
S
- S
2
1 ),(
2
2
22
Sn (5)
Arab Journal of Nuclear Science and Applications, 46(3), (153-166) 2013
155
where
)1(n 22 S (6)
These functions ),( n are equal to zero for refractive index n equal to unity and equal to unity for
all angles larger than the critical angle c cos c , which is given by 22
/)1( nnc .
The partial heat fluxes )(
Rq
is defined by
),( )(
1
0
RIdRq (7)
This general problem can be treated in terms of the solution of the source-free problem with
specular boundary conditions formulated mathematically as
1
1
0
2
,,2
,11
rpdr
rr (8)
1121 andRrR
with boundary conditions
),(),(, 111 RnRS
(9a)
),(),()(, 22222 RnTIRS
b (9b)
The solution of general problem (1-2) can be given in terms of the solution of the source-free problem
(8-9) demonstrated as follows:
Changing to in equation (3-3), multiplying the resultant equation by ),(2 rIr and
equation (1) by ),(2 rr subtracting the obtained equations and then integrating the resultant
equation over ),()1,1( 21 RRroverand and using the boundary conditions of equations (2)
and (9) leads to
13112211 )()( ARqARqA
(10)
Where
2
22211 )(21 RRAd
(11a)
2
11112 )(2 RRAd
(11b)
)()( 22
2
211
2
1113 RFRRFRQA
(11c)
1
0
),()( RdR (12)
)( ibii TIF (13a)
Arab Journal of Nuclear Science and Applications, 46(3), (153-166) 2013
156
2
1
1
1
2
1 ),(),(
R
R
rrQdrdrQ (13b)
Put and rr in equation (3-3) and multiplying equation(3-1) and (3-3) by
),,(2 rIr respectively, subtracting the resultant equation, integrating over )1,1( and over
),( 21 RRr and using the boundary conditions of equations (2) and (9) gives
23122221 )()( ARqARqA
(14)
Where
2
21221 )(2 RRAd
(15a)
2
121
2
222 )(2 RRRAd
(15b)
)()( 12
2
221
2
1223 RFRRFRQA
(15c)
And
2
1
1
1
2
2 ),(),(
R
R
rrQdrdrQ (16a)
21 RR (16b)
The simultaneous solution of both equations (3-5) and (3-10) gives the partial heat fluxes at the
boundaries, )()( 12 RqandRq
of the source problem in terms of the partial heat fluxes of the
source free problem and the integration of the energy sources ).,( rQ then
21122211
23122213
2 )(AAAA
AAAARq
(17)
21122211
21132311
2 )(AAAA
AAAARq
(18)
SOLUATION of THE SOURCE FREE PROBLEM
The source free problem of radiative transfer described by equations (8) and (9) can be solved
by using the Pomraning Eddington approximation given in the form.(12)
)O(r, q(r) )(r, G(r) ),( r (19)
Where (r,) and O(r,) are even and odd functions of , respectively, which are spatially slowly
varying and are defined by normalization relations.
1 )(r, O )(r,
1
1
1
1
dd (20)
The space irradiant, G(r) is defined as
)(r, )(
1
1
drG (21a)
Arab Journal of Nuclear Science and Applications, 46(3), (153-166) 2013
157
While the net heat flux q(r), is given as
1
1
),()( rdrq (21b)
Integrating the source free problem equation, (8) over (-1,1), using Eqs. (19-21) one get the first–
order differential equations for G(r) and q(r) as17
0 G(r) q(r) (2/r) /)( drrdq (22a)
where
1 0 (22b)
Multiplying equation (1) by and integrating over (-1,1), using Eqs. (19-21) lead to
0 q(r) )/( G(r) /r)( /)( DdrrdG (23a)
where
/3)a( - 1 0 (23b)
1
1
2),( rEdD (23c)
(1/D) - 3 (23d)
The function ),( r and ),( rO can be defined by substituting equation (19) into equation (8),
separating the even and odd terms of and using eqs. (22a) and (23a) to obtain
) -1/()1)(2/( ),( 22
0
2
0 ar (24a)
and
) - )/(1 a ( )]2/([ ),(22
0
2
00 rO (24b)
Where
D / 2
0 (25)
which can be calculated using the transcendental equation
) - 1(
) (1ln Y ) / 2(
0
0
00
(26a)
Where
)a ( / )a ( 2
00
2
0 Y (26b)
This equation can be solved numerically to find the value of 0 for each value of the scattering albedo
0 .
Arab Journal of Nuclear Science and Applications, 46(3), (153-166) 2013
158
The two-coupled first order differential equations (22a) and (23a) lead to the second - order
differential equation
0 G(r) ] - r
[ dr
dG(r) 2)/r] [(
)( 2
022
2
dr
rGd (27)
This equation is in the form of Bessel equation which has the solution
)()()()( 2/)1(22/)1(1
2/)1(vrKCvrICvrrG
(28)
Where )()( xKandxI are modified Bessel functions of the first and second kind.
Substituting (28) into (23a) leads to
)()()()(- )( 2/)3(22/)3(1
2/)1(
0
vrKCvrICvrrq
(29)
The constants C1 and C2 appearing in (28) and (29) can be defined using the boundary conditions
of our problem given by (9). This boundary conditions can be verified using a weight function.
Weight function method
In this method the boundary conditions given by (9a) and (9b) are forced to be satisfied using a
weight function )(W as follows(18-20)
1
0
1111b11 0 ] ),-(R ),( - )(TI - ),(R[ )( nWds
(30a)
1
0
2222b22 0 ] ),(R ),( - )(TI - ),-(R[ )( nWds
(30b)
Here, we shall use two different weight functions to verify the boundary conditions and determine the
constants C1 and C2. The first weight function WA, is taken in terms of the adjoint of the radiation
intensity as(18)
sphere surfaceouter at ),(R ),-(R
sphere surfaceinner at ),-(R ),(R )(
22
11
AW (31)
This weight function is the Lagrange multiplier of the boundary condition. The second weight function
WH, is taken in terms of Chandrasekher’s H-function as(21)
3 / )H( )(1/2 HW (32)
In the calculations Chandrasekher’s H-function will be taken by its approximate form (18)
1 ]) 1(
) - 1( - [1 C )( 0
0
0
0
H (33a)
1 ) 2 / 3 1 )( 3(2/ )H( 0 (33b)
Arab Journal of Nuclear Science and Applications, 46(3), (153-166) 2013
159
Where
]1) 1( /[2)(Z exp 2/12
000 00
C (34a)
) - 1ln(
)(1 /)ln(1 2 -
2
0
000
(34b)
and Z0 is the extrapolated distance of the Milne problem.
These weight function methods lead to a set of two linear equations for the constants. The
simultaneous solution of these set of equations gives the values of C1 and C2 which used to find
irradiant, G(r) and the net heat flux q(r). The values of G(r), q(r), and
at the boundaries of the
source-free problem will be used in Eqs. (10) to (18) to calculate the partial fluxes at the boundaries q-
and q+ of the general problem described by Eqs. (1) and (2).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Here, we examine the Pomraning Eddington method in solving the source-free medium in the
determination of the partial heat flux at the boundaries )(
Rq
and )( -
Rq of the spherical shell of
different radii (0.5, 1) and (1,2). In Table 1 The calculation for source-free medium with transparent
inner surface and diffuse reflecting outer surface of emissivity2 =0.5. The calculations are carried out
for transparent boundaries and the same media of Table 1 but with black-body radiation given by
)1/(1)( 0TI b and are given in Tables 2 and 3, respectively.
All the calculations are normalized to the outer surface black-body radiation, compared with
Ref.( 11) and show good agreement.
Also, we examine the variation involved in the determination of the partial heat flux at the
boundaries )(
Rq
and )( -
Rq , when the angular dependent Fresnel’s reflectivity at the boundary
used instead of constant reflectivity. The calculations are carried out for of the spherical shell of
different radii (0.5, 1) and (1,2) mfp using the weight function method with two weight functions WH
and WA for homogeneous media of isotropic and anisotropic scattering with single scattering albedo
0 between .5 and 1.0. The same calculations are carried out for the same media of Tables (1-3) but
with diffuse reflecting surface and specular reflecting outer surface with refractive index n2=1.33 and
n2=1.5 and are given in Tables (4-6).
The caculations are carried out for homogeneous media of forward anisotropic, isotropic and
backward anisotropic scattering. The phase functions of forward and backward anisotropic scattering
describe media of refractive index and size parameter (η, x)given by (1.2, 2) and (∞, 1), respectively.
The Legendre polynomials expansion coefficients of these phase functions are taken from Ref. (7) and
give linear anisotropic parameters a =1.81517 and -0.58659, respectively.
The comparison shows that the results of the Pomraning Eddington approximation become more
accurate for media of high scattering albedo.
Arab Journal of Nuclear Science and Applications, 46(3), (153-166) 2013
160
Table 1: The partial heat fluxes q+(R2) and q-(R1) at the surfaces of a homogeneous spherical shell of diffuse reflecting boundaries , of
emissivities ε1=1.0 and ε2=0.5, black-body radiation Ib (T1)=0, Ib(T2)=1.0, Ib (T)=0 and for different radii R1, R2
ω0
R1=0.5 and R2=1.0 R1=1.0 and R2=2.0
Q+(R2) q-(R1) q+(R2) q-(R1)
WA WH Ref[11] WA WH Ref[11 ] WA WH Ref[ 11] WA WH Ref[11 ]
Forward Scattering
0.3 0.0557 0.0815 0.1083 0.0997 0.1431 0.1937 0.0293 0.0412 0.0354 0.0619 0.0869 0.1147
0.5 0.0845 0.1147 0.1405 0.1464 0.1847 0.2270 0.0573 0.0703 0.0834 0.1023 0.1256 0.1502
0.7 0.1720 0.1825 0.1858 0.2378 0.2525 0.2726 0.1191 0.1259 0.1325 0.1820 0.1922 0.2069
0.9 0.2501 0.2482 0.2544 0.3334 0.3310 0.3393 0.2221 0.2206 0.2259 0.3021 0.3001 0.3073
0.99 0.2981 0.2969 0.2982 0.3804 0.3793 0.3807 0.2997 0.2989 0.2999 0.3835 0.3824 0.3836
0.999 0.3032 03029 0.3032 0.3854 0.3850 0.3854 0.3093 0.3090 0.3093 0.3931 0.3928 0.3931
Isotropic Scattering
0.3 0.0572 0.0840 0.1124 0.0959 0.1409 0.1896 0.0327 0.0471 0.0620 0.0551 0.0794 0.1048
0.5 0.0961 0.1228 0.1475 0.1438 0.1807 0.2193 0.0573 0.0810 0.0966 0.0779 0.1102 0.1319
0.7 0.1668 0.1864 0.1954 0.2190 0.2460 0.2603 0.1266 0.1405 0.1513 0.1479 0.1642 0.1771
0.9 0.2600 0.2592 0.2652 0.3148 0.3137 0.3210 0.2476 0.2469 0.2525 0.2608 0.2600 0.2659
0.99 0.3081 0.3072 0.3083 0.3587 0.3578 0.3590 0.3339 0.3326 0.3340 0.3396 0.3385 0.3398
.999 0.3131 0.3127 0.3132 0.3633 0.3628 0.3633 0.3445 0.3440 0.3444 0.3494 .3491 0.3494
Backward Scattering
0.3 0.0571 0.0851 0.1136 0.0947 0.1411 0.1885 0.0336 0.0491 0.0644 0.0532 0.0776 0.1019
0.5 0.0991 0.1227 0.1496 0.1347 0.1794 0.2173 0.0574 0.0828 0.1005 0.0725 0.1047 0.1265
0.7 0.1625 0.1873 0.1982 0.2111 0.2434 0.2571 0.1267 0.1448 0.1565 0.1371 0.1567 0.1690
0.9 0.2630 0.2625 0.2684 0.3096 0.3090 0.3159 0.2538 0.2534 0.2590 0.2501 0.2497 0.2552
0.99 0.3114 0.3102 0.3115 0.3523 0.3513 0.3525 0.3416 0.3405 0.3418 0.3289 0.3278 0.3291
0.999 0.3263 0.3159 0.3163 0.3566 0.3562 0.3566 0.3525 0.3521 0.3527 0.3388 0.3384 0.3388
Arab Journal of Nuclear Science and Applications, 46(3), (153-166) 2013
161
Table 2: The partial heat fluxes q+(R2) and q-(R1) at the surfaces of a homogeneous spherical shell of transparent boundaries , black-body
radiation Ib (T1)=0, Ib(T2)=1.0, Ib (T) = 1/(1- ω0) and for different radii R1, R2
ω0
R1=0.5 and R2=1.0 R1=1.0 and R2=2.0
Q+(R2) q-(R1) q+(R2) q-(R1)
WA WH Ref[11] WA WH Ref[11 ] WA WH Ref[ 11] WA WH Ref[11 ]
Forward Scattering
0.3 0.4477 0.4861 0.5240 0.4305 0.4979 0.5689 0.5557 0.5766 0.5986 0.5321 0.5757 0.6231
0.5 0.5210 0.5629 0.6015 0.5274 0.5774 0.6245 0.6866 0.7071 0.7291 0.6604 0.6970 0.7349
0.7 0.6639 0.6754 0.6958 0.6381 0.6541 0.6901 0.8894 0.8981 0.9113 0.8499 0.8631 0.8833
0.9 0.8076 0.8059 0.8118 0.7632 0.7610 0.7682 1.1742 1.1515 1.1779 1.0829 1.0808 1.0878
0.99 0.8727 0.8720 0.8729 0.8081 0.8074 0.8083 1.3408 1.3400 1.3409 1.2070 1.2062 1.2071
0.999 0.8794 0.8790 0.8794 0.8125 0.8120 0.8125 1.3592 1.3587 1.3592 1.2202 1.2196 1.2202
Isotropic Scattering
0.3 0.4429 04841 0.5248 0.4278 0.4969 0.5651 0.5516 0.5763 0.6006 0.5263 0.5679 0.6090
0.5 0.5318 0.5678 0.6018 0.5208 0.5698 0.6196 0.6694 0.7060 0.7289 0.6329 0.6827 0.7139
0.7 0.6561 0.6776 0.6949 0.6355 0.6653 0.6865 0.8743 0.8917 0.9057 0.8265 0.8468 0.8631
0.9 0.8052 0.8045 0.8098 0.7648 0.7640 0.7703 1.1629 1.1622 1.1672 1.0868 1.0861 1.0913
0.99 0.8710 0.8702 0.8710 0.8152 0.8145 0.8153 1.3315 1.3307 1.3216 1.2380 1.2372 1.2342
.999 0.8775 0.8773 0.8775 0.8201 0.8198 0.8201 1.3503 1.3499 1.3503 1.2549 1.2543 1.2550
Backward Scattering
0.3 0.4418 0.4848 0.5251 0.4259 0.4971 0.5639 0.5499 0.5763 0.6011 0.5239 0.5657 0.6048
0.5 0.5347 0.5677 0.6019 05188 0.5683 0.6181 0.6639 0.7030 0.7286 0.6268 0.6764 0.7076
0.7 0.6500 0.6772 0.6946 0.6273 0.6628 0.6853 0.8671 0.8895 0.9039 0.8172 0.8414 0.8570
0.9 0.8044 0.8040 0.8092 0.7653 0.7648 0.7709 1.1595 1.1591 1.1640 1.0869 1.0865 1.0914
0.99 0.8703 0.8696 0.8704 0.8173 0.8165 0.8174 1.3291 1.3284 1.3292 1.2457 1.2449 1.2458
0.999 0.8814 0.8811 0.8769 0.8223 0.8219 0.8223 1.3481 1.3476 1.3481 1.2636 1.2634 1.2637
Arab Journal of Nuclear Science and Applications, 46(3), (153-166) 2013
162
Table 3: The partial heat fluxes q+(R2) and q-(R1) at the surfaces of a homogeneous spherical shell of diffuse reflecting boundaries , of
emissivities ε1=1.0 and ε2=0.5 , black-body radiation Ib (T1)=0, Ib(T2)=1.0, Ib (T) = 1/(1- ω0) and for different radii R1, R2
ω0
R1=0.5 and R2=1.0 R1=1.0 and R2=2.0
Q+(R2) q-(R1) q+(R2) q-(R1)
WA WH Ref[11] WA WH Ref[11 ] WA WH Ref[ 11] WA WH Ref[11 ]
Forward Scattering
0.3 0.4403 0.4816 0.5292 0.4192 0.4929 0.5782 0.5592 0.5830 0.6093 0.5396 0.5900 0.6457
0.5 0.5456 0.5857 0.6305 0.5334 0.5982 0.6706 0.7088 0.7367 0.7670 0.6987 0.7491 0.8038
0.7 0.7236 0.7417 0.7701 0.7285 0.7549 0.7966 0.9786 0.9942 1.0186 0.9934 1.0147 1.0529
0.9 0.9653 0.9618 0.9739 0.9671 0.9623 0.9786 1.4681 1.4639 1.4674 1.4880 1.4821 1.5020
0.99 1.0989 1.0966 1.0991 1.0894 1.0872 1.0898 1.8353 1.8327 1.8357 1.8472 1.8441 1.8476
0.999 1.1133 1.1128 1.1133 1.1023 1.1017 1.1023 1.8804 1.8796 1.8804 1.8908 1.8899 1.8908
Isotropic Scattering
0.3 0.4370 0.4818 0.5304 0.4183 0.4932 0.5746 0.57511 0.6044 0.6301 0.4944 0.5507 0.6301
0.5 0.5214 0.5867 0.6320 0.5001 0.5971 0.6644 0.6909 0.7232 0.7729 0.6591 0.7247 0.7738
0.7 0.7080 0.7425 0.7715 0.7040 0.7498 0.7885 0.9675 0.9999 1.0271 0.9347 0.9727 1.0045
0.9 0.9657 0.9642 0.9756 0.9587 0.9567 0.9706 1.4833 1.4815 1.4961 1.4208 1.4188 1.4343
0.99 1.1017 1.0998 1.1019 1.0832 1.0813 1.0836 1.8677 1.8642 1.8681 1.7767 1.7734 1.7771
.999 1.1161 1.1153 1.1161 1.0964 1.0954 1.0964 1.9152 1.9140 1.9152 1.8206 1.8196 1.8206
Backward Scattering
0.3 0.4356 0.4823 0.5308 0.4153 0.4931 0.5734 0.5533 0.5839 0.6141 0.5291 0. 5774 0.6253
0.5 0.5160 0.5844 0.6324 0.4934 0.5928 0.6625 0.6833 0.7374 0.7744 0.6503 0.7186 0.7650
0.7 0.6988 0.7423 0.7720 0.6910 0.7402 0.7859 0.9579 1.0001 1.0290 0.9147 0.9600 0.9907
0.9 0.9657 0.9648 0.9761 0.9560 0.9549 0.9682 1.4867 1.4855 1.5003 1.4024 1.4012 1.4157
0.99 1.1024 1.1001 1.1027 1.0813 1.0793 1.0817 1.8761 1.8729 1.8765 1.7580 1.7551 1.7584
0.999 1.1170 1.1165 1.1170 1.0946 1.0942 1.0946 1.9243 1.9231 1.9243 1.8021 1.8009 1.8021
Arab Journal of Nuclear Science and Applications, 46(3), (153-166) 2013
163
Table 4: The partial heat flux q+(R2) and q-(R1) at the surfaces of a homogeneous spherical shell
of diffuse reflecting and specular reflecting outer boundaries with reflective index
n2=1.33 , and n2=1.5 respectively, of emissivities ε1=1.0 and ε2=0.5 , black-body
radiation Ib (T1)=0, Ib(T2)=1.0, Ib (T) = 0.0 and for different radii R1, R2,
Ω0
R1=0.5 and R2=1.0 R1=1.0 and R2=2.0
q+(R2) q-(R1) q+(R2) q-(R1)
WA WH WA WH WA WH WA WH
Forward Scattering
0.3 0.0558 0.0823 0.0999 0.1444 0.0293 0.0416 0.0620 0.0877
0.5 0.0858 0.1171 0.1487 0.1886 0.0582 0.0718 0.1039 0.1283
0.7 0.1770 0.1885 0.2448 0.2608 0.1226 0.1301 0.1874 0.1985
0.9 0.2673 0.2669 0.3566 0.3560 0.2399 0.2366 0.3264 0.3217
0.99 0.3322 0.3251 0.4240 0.4132 0.3342 0.3272 0.4275 0.4187
0.999 0.3382 0.3315 0.4298 0.4213 0.3384 0.3408 0.4400 0.4301
Isotropic Scattering
0.3 0.0574 0.0848 0.0962 0.1422 0.0328 0.0475 0.0553 0.0802
0.5 0.0974 0.1254 0.1457 0.1845 0.0581 0.0827 0.0789 0.1125
0.7 0.1717 0.1930 0.2254 0.2547 0.1303 0.1455 0.1522 0.1700
0.9 0.2819 0.2796 0.3413 0.3385 0.2681 0.2660 0.2824 0.2801
0.99 0.3439 0.3363 0.4004 0.3916 0.3741 0.3652 0.3805 0.3716
0.999 0.3507 0.3423 0.4068 0.3971 0.3875 0.3779 0.3931 0.3835
Backward Scattering
0.3 0.0576 0.0859 0.0948 0.1424 0.0340 0.0496 0.0537 0.0783
0.5 0.1003 0.1253 0.1363 0.1832 0.0581 0.0846 0.0734 0.1069
0.7 0.1671 0.1938 0.2171 0.2518 0.1303 0.1498 0.1410 0.1621
0.9 0.2852 0.2834 0.3357 0.3336 0.2750 0.2733 0.2710 0.2693
0.99 0.3478 0.3399 0.3934 0.3849 0.3831 0.3744 0.3689 0.3605
0.999 0.3545 0.3459 0.3996 0.3901 0.3972 0.3871 0.3817 0.3720
n2=1.5
Forward Scattering
0.3 0.0561 0.0828 0.1004 0.1453 0.0295 0.0418 0.0623 0.0883
0.5 0.0867 0.1185 0.1502 0.1907 0.0588 0.0726 0.1049 0.1297
0.7 0.1798 0.1916 0.2486 0.2651 0.1245 0.1322 0.1903 0.2018
0.9 0.2808 0.2763 0.3746 0.3685 0.2484 0.2445 0.3379 0.3325
0.99 0.3480 0.3394 0.4441 0.4335 0.3501 0.3417 0.4478 0.4372
0.999 0.3556 0.3501 0.4520 0.4449 0.3633 0.3576 0.4616 0.4544
Isotropic Scattering
0.3 0.0576 0.0852 0.0965 0.1429 0.0329 0.0478 0.0556 0.0805
0.5 0.0983 0.1268 0.1471 0.1866 0.0586 0.0837 0.0797 0.1138
0.7 0.1744 0.1960 0.2290 0.2587 0.1324 0.1477 0.1546 0.1727
0.9 0.2924 0.2876 0.3541 0.3482 02779 0.2735 0.2972 0.2880
0.99 0.3604 0.3516 0.4195 0.4094 0.3926 0.3824 0.3994 0.3891
0.999 0.3681 0.3584 0.4270 0.4158 0.4076 0.3965 0.4135 0.4023
Backward Scattering
0.3 0.0574 0.0863 0.0952 0.1430 0.0338 0.0498 0.0535 0.0787
0.5 0.1012 0.1267 0.1375 0.1853 0.0586 0.0855 0.0740 0.1081
0.7 0.1697 0.1970 0.2204 0.2560 0.1323 0.1523 0.1431 0.1648
0.9 0.2960 0.2940 0.3483 0.3460 0.2852 0.2833 0.2791 0.2792
0.99 0.3645 0.3555 0.4124 0.4025 0.4024 0.3922 0.3874 0.3777
0.999 0.3721 0.3622 0.4194 0.4087 0.4179 0.4063 0.4016 0.3905
Arab Journal of Nuclear Science and Applications, 46(3), (153-166) 2013
164
Table 5: The partial heat flux q+(R2) and q-(R1) at the surfaces of a homogeneous spherical shell
of transparent inner boundary and specular reflecting outer boundary with reflective
index n2=1.33 and 1.5 respectively, black-body radiation Ib (T1)=0, Ib(T2)=1.0, Ib (T) =
1/(1- ω0) and for different radii R1, R2,
ω0
R1=0.5 and R2=1.0 R1=1.0 and R2=2.0
q+(R2) q-(R1) q+(R2) q-(R1)
WA WH WA WH WA WH WA WH
Forward Scattering
0.3 0.4484 0.4907 0.4312 0.5026 0.5565 0.5820 0.5329 0.5811
0.5 0.5290 0.5548 0.5355 0.5896 0.6972 0.7221 0.6706 0.7118
0.7 0.6834 0.6977 0.6568 0.6757 0.9155 0.9277 0.8748 0.8735
0.9 0.8514 0.8456 0.8046 0.7984 1.2378 1.2082 1.1416 1.1340
0.99 0.9327 0.9221 0.8637 0.8537 1.4331 1.4169 1.2901 1.2754
0.999 0.9414 0.9288 0.8697 0.8580 1.4550 1.4356 1.3062 1.2886
Isotropic Scattering
0.3 0.4444 0.4887 0.4292 0.5016 0.5534 0.5818 0.5280 0.5733
0.5 0.5389 0.5799 0.5277 0.5819 0.6783 0.7210 0.6413 0.6972
0.7 0.6752 0.7017 0.6540 0.6889 0.8997 0.9234 0.8506 0.8796
0.9 0.8486 0.8451 0.8060 0.8026 1.2256 1.2209 1.1454 1.1409
0.99 0.9309 0.9195 0.8713 0.8606 1.4231 1.4060 1.3232 1.3072
0.999 0.9393 0.9265 0.8778 0.8658 1.4454 1.4256 1.3432 1.3247
Backward Scattering
0.3 0.4423 0.4894 0.4263 0.5018 0.5505 0.5817 0.5244 0.5710
0.5 0.5410 0.5797 0.5250 0.5804 0.6718 0.7179 0.6342 0.6907
0.7 0.6683 0.7006 0.6450 0.6857 0.8916 0.9202 0.8403 0.8704
0.9 0.8477 0.8448 0.8065 0.8037 1.2219 1.2180 1.1454 1.1417
0.99 0.9302 0.9191 0.8735 0.8630 1.4205 1.4040 1.3314 1.3157
0.999 0.9436 0.9304 0.8804 0.8679 1.4433 1.4231 1.3528 1.3342
n2=1.5
Forward Scattering
0.3 0.4505 0.4936 0.4332 0.5056 0.5592 0.5855 0.5354 0.5846
0.5 0.5345 0.5813 0.5411 0.5963 0.7044 0.7302 0.6775 0.7198
0.7 0.6942 0.7091 0.6672 0.6867 0.9299 0.9427 0.8887 0.9062
0.9 0.8714 0.8647 0.8235 0.8165 1.2670 1.2354 1.1685 1.1596
0.99 0.9588 0.9462 0.8879 0.8761 1.4731 1.4540 1.3261 1.3089
0.999 0.9682 0.9594 0.8946 0.8863 1.4965 1.4830 1.3434 1.3312
Isotropic Scattering
0.3 0.4457 0.4910 0.4305 0.5040 0.5550 0.5845 0.5296 0.5760
0.5 0.5440 0.5865 0.5327 0.5886 0.6847 0.7292 0.6474 0.7052
0.7 0.6860 0.7126 0.6645 0.6996 0.9142 0.9377 0.8642 0.8905
0.9 0.8686 0.8605 0.8250 0.8172 1.2544 1.2431 1.1723 1.1617
0.99 0.9568 0.9440 0.8955 0.8836 1.4627 1.4435 1.3599 1.3421
0.999 0.9661 0.9519 0.9029 0.8895 1.4867 1.4646 1.3816 1.3609
Backward Scattering
0.3 0.4436 0.4914 0.4276 0.5039 0.5521 0.5842 0.5260 0.5735
0.5 0.5458 0.5863 0.5295 0.5869 0.6776 0.7260 0.6398 0.6985
0.7 0.6786 0.7122 0.6549 0.6971 0.9053 0.9355 0.8532 0.8849
0.9 0.8677 0.8646 0.8255 0.8225 1.2508 1.2465 1.1724 1.1684
0.99 0.9561 0.9437 0.8979 0.8861 1.4602 1.4416 1.3685 1.3510
0.999 0.9704 0.9560 0.9054 0.8918 1.4843 1.4622 1.3912 1.3599
Arab Journal of Nuclear Science and Applications, 46(3), (153-166) 2013
165
Table 6: The partial heat flux q+(R2) and q-(R1) at the surfaces of a homogeneous spherical shell
of diffuse and specular reflecting outer boundaries with reflective index n2=1.33 and 1.5
respectively, of emissivities ε1=1.0 and ε2=0.5, black-body radiation Ib (T1)=0,
Ib(T2)=1.0, Ib (T) = 1/(1- ω0) and for different radii R1, R2,
ω0
R1=0.5 and R2=1.0 R1=1.0 and R2=2.0
q+(R2) q-(R1) q+(R2) q-(R1)
WA WH WA WH WA WH WA WH
Forward Scattering
0.3 0.4411 0.4816 0.4201 0.4975 0.5601 0.5885 0.5404 0.5956
0.5 0.5540 0.5981 0.5416 0.6109 0.7197 0.7523 0.7095 0.7650
0.7 0.7448 0.7662 0.7498 0.7798 1.0073 1.0270 1.0225 1.0482
0.9 1.0176 1.0157 1.0195 1.0096 1.5477 1.5359 1.5687 1.5550
0.99 1.1745 1.1595 1.1644 1.1496 1.9616 1.9379 1.9743 1.9500
0.999 1.1917 1.1758 1.1799 1.1641 2.0129 1.9860 2.0240 1.9969
Isotropic Scattering
0.3 0.4383 0.4864 0.4196 0.4979 0.5768 0.6101 0.4959 0.5559
0.5 0.5294 0.5991 0.5078 0.6098 0. 7001 0.7386 0.6679 0.7401
0.7 0.7286 0.7689 0.7245 0.7764 0.9957 1.0354 0.9619 1.0072
0.9 1.0178 1.0129 1.0104 1.0050 1.5633 1.5563 1.4974 1.4905
0.99 1.1775 1.1621 1.1577 1.1425 1.9962 1.9697 1.8989 1.8741
0.999 1.1947 1.1779 1.1736 1.1569 2. 0501 2.0214 1.9488 1.9217
Backward Scattering
0.3 0.4397 0.4868 0.4195 0.4977 0.5589 0.5894 0.5344 0.5828
0.5 0.5221 0.5968 0.4993 0.6054 0.6914 0.7530 0.6580 0.7338
0.7 0.7185 0.7679 0.7105 0.7657 0.9849 1.0346 0.9405 0.9931
0.9 1.0177 1.0138 1.0074 1.0034 1.5667 1.5610 1.4779 1.4724
0.99 1.1783 1.1627 1.1557 1.1407 2.0052 1.9795 1.8789 1.8550
0.999 1.1959 1.1790 1.1719 1.1555 2.0602 2.0308 1.9293 1.9957
n2=1.5
Forward Scattering
0.3 0.4430 0.4891 0.4218 0.5005 0.5627 0.5920 0.5430 0.5991
0.5 0.5597 0.6049 0.5472 0.6178 0.7272 0.7608 0.7168 0.7736
0.7 0.7566 0.7787 0.7617 0.7926 1.0232 1.0438 1.0387 1.0653
0.9 1.0416 1.0319 1.0435 1.0325 1.5841 1.5706 1.6056 1.5902
0.99 1.2074 1.1899 1.1969 1.1797 2.0164 1.9887 2.0295 2.2025
0.999 1.2257 1.2146 1.2136 1.2025 2.0703 2.0516 2.0818 2.0628
Isotropic Scattering
0.3 0.4397 0.4886 0.4209 0.5002 0.5787 0.6130 0.4975 0.5585
0.5 0.5333 0.6060 0.5116 0.6167 0.7067 0.7470 0.6742 0.7485
0.7 0.7403 0.7808 0.7361 0.7885 1.0116 1.0515 0.9773 1.0229
0.9 1.0417 1.0310 1.0342 1.0233 1.6001 1.5842 1.5326 1.5176
0.99 1.2102 1.1931 1.1899 1.1750 2.0517 2.0223 1.9517 1.9238
0.999 1.2288 1.2101 1.2071 1.1885 2.1086 2.0767 2.0045 1.9743
Backward Scattering
0.3 0.4383 0.4889 0.4170 0.4999 0.5555 0.5919 0.5312 0.5853
0.5 0.5267 0.6035 0.5036 0.6122 0.6974 0.7615 0.6638 0.7421
0.7 0.7296 0.7807 0.7214 0.7785 1.0001 1.0518 .9550 1.0096
0.9 1.0417 1.0376 1.0312 1.0269 1.6037 1.5975 1.5128 1.5069
0.99 1.2111 1.1938 1.1879 1.1713 2.0611 2.0325 1.9313 1.9046
0.999 1.2298 1.2114 1.2052 1.1872 2.1187 2.0866 1.9841 1.9540
Arab Journal of Nuclear Science and Applications, 46(3), (153-166) 2013
166
CONCLUSION
The Pomraning Eddington method is used to solve the source-free radiative transfer problem
with transparent boundaries and specular reflectivity of the surface satisfied Fresnel’s law. The
solution of this problem is used to find the partial heat flux at the spherical shell boundaries of a
source radiative transfer problem with diffuse and specular reflectivity boundaries. The caculations are
carried out for spherical shell media of different radii, different single scattering albedo and different
refractive index. The media are taken with or without internal black-body radiation. The caculations
are given for homogeneous media of forward anisotropic, isotropic and backward anisotropic
scattering. The results of Pomraning Eddington method give agreement with those of the Galerkin
technique.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to acknowledge Prof. S. A. El-Wakil for his continuous guidance,
encouragement, reviews and the useful discussions regarding this manuscript.
RERERENCES
_
(1) Thynell S T and Ozisik M N, IMA, J. Appl. Math., 1985; 34: 323.
(2) EL Wakil S A, Attia M T and Abulwafa M H, JQSRT 1991; 46: 371.
(3) Jin Z and Stamres K Appl. Opt. 1994; 33: 431.
(4) Wilson, S. and Nanda, T. R. JQSRT 1990; 44: 345.
(5) Tsai, J. R., Ozisik M N. and Santarelli, F. JQSRT 1989; 42: 187.
(6) Aronson R, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 1995; 12(11): 2532.
(7) Elghazally A and Attia M T, Arab J. Nucl. Sci. Appl 2003; 36: 251-260.
(8) Li, W. and Tong, T. W. JQSRT 1990; 43: 239.
(9) Jia, G., Yener, Y. and Cipolla, J. W.Jr. JQSRT 1991; 46: 11.
(10) Abulwafa E M. JQSRT 1993; 49: 165.
(11) Abulwafa E M. and Attia M T JQSRT 1997; 58: 101.
(12) Pomraning G C, JQSRT 1969; 9: 407-422.
(13) A. Elgazaly and M. T. Attia Arab J. of Nucl Scie and Applications, 43(3),193, (2010).
(14) A. Elgazaly, The 7 thConference.On Nuclear and particle Physics, 11 –15 Nov., 192, 2009,
Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt.
(15) Ozisik M N, Radiative Transfer 1973 (New York: Wiley).
(16) Menguc, M. P. and Viskanta, R. JQSRT 1983; 29: 381.
(17) Attia M T and Abulwafa E M, Waves in Random Media 1996; 6: 189-196.
(18) Pomraning G C, Ann. Nucl. Energy 1993; 20: 521.
(19) Rulko R P and Larson E W Nucl. Sci. Eng., 1993; 114: 271.
(20) Larson E W and Pomraning G C, Nucl. Sci. Eng., 1991; 109: 49.
(21) Pomraning G C, Transport Theary Stat. Phys. 1990; 19: 515.