R~AGAN.x.$!?H$W& S’W~&l$$~~82~~U. $3:: 419 -( 1901)) aff g 35c. Cl,% 90 (1900). 1 i ~:+if~$$$:+.. 1::. ,“>’ .i : j. ., .’ ,..

RECTGR 3. UN I.TED ST@?ES,@?&~ SF 698 .( 1875). : : See HOT1 rSPL(‘INGSi~ASES;:g?~~!.r’S~~~8pl1875)., z --. \” ’

RED BIRD v. UN.iTED<?!ITAT@, -203 .U. ‘S. 76 (1906). SeeCHEROKEE .:INTERM@R&GE. CASES, 203 U. S. 76(1906). t

REDFIEI;D’ v:UNITED! STATES;$%i.C. Bis.473 (1892).RED HA VK v. WILBU;R;-89 fi$d 29s.(App. D. C. 1930).REEDx t.VRLTY:Zl&7i Fe&419: (:Ij,::f%..E. :D.: Okla.. 1912). rev’d

..sub norn.c~~~~~,-R~E~.~~~.;~F~;!~. (C. C. A. 81915) ;a~%~reJ.feat%$$atib I$~%~WELTY ;v; REED;231Fed: 930

.-,(Gfi,C:‘,~A:4,glG). r;::i $6 z,r< i .J: !‘.: __ ;’REEVES 6; C~~~~SHEETS,:16’Okla~~342,r82 Pac. 487 (1905). .,R~NFRO.,~~,wNI~.E?,sTA~ES~~l.~ F<%d: 991 (C. C. A. 8, 1926).RENFROW v. UNITED STATES. 3 Okla. 161. 41 Pac. 88 (1895).REX v.. UNITED STATES,%?51 II. ‘S,, 382 -:( 1920 ), aff’g 53 C,

cls. 32O!-(-lS13);“;.i: Z.-T k TV!: ..:.: ‘.’ jREYNOLDS v: C!LOWDUS$4~$nd.~!T--679, 76 S. W. 277 (1903).:REYNOLDS v~FEWELL,~236U.‘S.~;58(1915).REYNOLDS v. MohR.THUR;Z: Pe,ti ~417: (1829) _,REYNOLDS v. UNITED STATES, 174 Fed. 212 (C. C. A. 1909).REYNOLDS v. UNITEDaSTATES, 205 Fed. 685 (D. C. S. D.

1913).REYNOLDS v.. UNITED STATES, 45 F. 2d 762 (C. C. A. 10,

1931).REYNOLDS v. UNITED STATES, 252 Fed. 65 (C: C. A. 8.

* 1918)‘,- r&d 250 U. S. l04 (1919).RHINE, EXR. v. UNITED STATES, 33 C. Cls. 481 (1898).RTClE v;,MAYBEE, 2’F.,Snpp-669 (D. C. W. D. N. Y. 1933).RICHARDVILLE v. THORP, 28 Fed. 52 (C. C. Kans. 1886).RICKNOR v.:CI,ABBER, 4 1nd.T. ~660 (1903). 76 S. W. 271.RIDDLE v. HUDGINS, 58 Fed. 490 (C. C. A. 8. lS93).RIVERSIDE OIL AND-REFINING CO. v. UNITED STATES,

a 20 F. .2d 873.(C. C. A. 8, 1927). cert. den. 275 U. S. 552.-275,U;S. 555: 1 See UNITED STATES v. HAYNES, 20 F. 2d

873 (C. .c. A. 8;1927). -ROBERTS v. ANDERSON, 66 F: ‘2d 874 (0. C. A. 10, 1933).ROBERTS v. UNDERWOOD. 237 U. S. 386 (1915). See PIGEON‘: v. ,BUtiK, 237: U. S. 386 ‘(.915). .

ROBINSON v. EWERT. 291 ,Fed.. 9 (C. C. A. 8. 1923). ’ROBINSON v. LONG GAS CO., 221 Fed. 395 (C. C. A. 8.1915).ROBINSON v. NAIL. 2 Ind. T. 503. 52 S. W. 49 ( 1899).ROBINSON. & CO. vi BELT, 187 U. S. 41 (1902), aff’g 100 Fed.

718 (C. C. A. 8, 1900).ROFF v.BURNEY. 168 U. S. 218 (1897).ROGERS v. HILL, 3 Ind. T. 562, 64 S. W. 536 (1901). writ of

error dim. 123 Fed. 1006 (1903).ROGERS v. ROGERS, 263 Fed. 160 (D. C. E. D. Okla. 1919).ROGERS V. UNITED STATES, 45 C. cm. 388 (1910).ROLFSON ‘v.- UNITED STATES, 283 U. S. 753 (1931). See

HALBERT v. UNITED STATES, 283 U. S. 753 (193l), rev’gUNITED STATES v. ROLFSON. 38 F. 2d 806 (C. C. A. 9.1930).

ROLLINS. AC&ID PRESBREY v. UNITED STATES, 23 C. Cls106 (1888).

ROMERO v.. UNITED STATES,&4’C. Cls. 331 (1889).ROSS v. DAY, 232 U. S. 110 (1914).ROSS v. BELLS. 56 Fed. 855 (C. C. Wash. 1893), app. dism

163 U. S. 702 61896).ROSS v. STEWART, 227 U. S.530 (1913).ROSS, ,EX’R. v. UNITED STATES, 29 C. Cls. 176 ( 1894).ROUBEDEAUX v. QUAKER OIL & GAS CO., OF OKLAHOMA

23 F. 2d 277 (C. C. A. 8. 1927), cert. den. 276 U. S. 636.ROUSSEAU v. UNITED STATES, 45 C. Cls. 1 (1909 )ROWE v. HENDERSON, 4 Iod. T. 597, 76 S. W. 250 (1903).ROY v. UNITED ST%TES, 45 C. Cl% 177 (1910).ROYAL BREWING CO. v. MISSOURI, K. & T. RY. CO., 21

Fed. 146 (D. C. Kans. 1914).RUBENS v. UNITED STATES 283 U. S. 753 (1931). Set

HALBERT v. UNITED STATES, 283 IJ. S. 75:{ ( 1931).RUSH v. THOMPSON, 2 Ind. T. 557, 53 S. W. 333 ( 1899).RUSSELL v. GREEN, 10 Okia. 340, 62 Pac. 817 ( 1900 1.RUSSELL v. UNITED STATES, 92 U. S. 698 (1875 ) See HO7

SPRINGS CASES. 92 U. S. 698 (1875).RYAN v. UNITED S.TATES, 8 C. Cls. 265 (1872).RYAN v. WASHINGTON. 302 U. S. 186 (1937). See I\IASO?

CO. v. TAX COMMISSION, 302 U. S. 186 (1937).SAC .AND FOX INDIANS OF THE MISSISSIPPI IN IOWA x

SAC AND FOX INDIANS OF THE MISSISSIPPI IN OKLAHOMA, 220 U. S. 481 (1911), aff’g 45 C. Cls. 287 (1310)

SAGE v. HAMPE, 235 U. S. 99 (1914).

ST. LOUIS & 5. F. RY;.CO. !v. OLOuGHLIN; 49.Fed. 440 (0. C.A. s,q892 j,: .:‘,‘ i:.; < ;,:.-4 ;: CL”. >;x.;‘r.,!;;: f; ,.:‘ ; .., I_i

ST. LOUIS & S. F. RY.:.CO., v,~~~~NNIGHAUSEN,-i Ittd: T.GS5. 104.5: w . 880!.~1907-):-; ::$y; ‘- :J-.-.‘.:‘,

IT. MARIE v. UNITED STATES24 F. Suuo. 237 (D. 0. S. D.

,

Cal. 1938). aff’d:lOS F. ,2d 876. ;(C. C.‘:-A. 9, i940) ; cert.* den. 61 Sup. Ct. 35. : ._ -;”

SALAZAR v..UNITED. STATES;.‘236;Fed.:541. (C. C. A. 8,.1916).SALOIS v. UNITEDST+TES, 32.C.>Cis- 68 (1896).SALOIS v. UNITED STATES, 33 .%:.f%: 326.,(1898) . .SANCHEZ iv.< U.~Irr\ED-:-STATES~~~~~~C~ :Cis. 224. .(1913) : , ‘..SANDERS v. THORNTON, 97 Fed. ‘863’*(%. C. A. 8, 1899); aff’g

2 Ind. T. 92, 48 S. W;-lOlfi~(1899j:;;’ I.,; -‘-: ‘. ”SANGER- v.!FLOW: 48:Fed.:152 f&C. 8. 8.l891j 1 writ of error

dism. 149 U. S. 785..~_~ , ,.

SARLLS V. ;IJNITE.DSTATES. 152u. s.-570. (1894) _SASS v.. THOMAS, 4-Lid. T. 331, 69S:.W. 893 (1902), s. c. 3 Ind.

T. 536, 64 SW! 528 (1901); I .x.:--i i -_‘::SAYER v. BROWN, 7IInd..T.:675.i104 S. W. 877 (1907)..SCHAAP V. UNITED STATES, 210 Fed. 853 (C. ti. A. ‘8, 1914).SCHEER v. :MOODY, 48 F. 2d 327 (D: C. Mnnt. 1931). rev’d sub

nom:. .MOODY ’ v.: ,JOHNSTON, ‘66 F. 2d 999 (C. C. A. 9,1933).

SCHEFF v. UNITED STATES, 33 F. 2d 263 (C. C. A. 8, 1929).SCHEWSON v. UNITED STATES. 31 C. Cls. 192 (1896).SCHRIMPSCHER v. STOdKTON.:iS3 U. S. 230 f 190.2): ’SCOTT v. UNITED STATES, 33’C. Cls. 486 c;t898).SEAPLES v. CARD. 246 Fed. 501 (D. C. E. D. Wash. 1915)SEEP v. SPADE, 179 Fed. 77 (C. t?. A. 8.1910).SEGNA v. UNITED STATES, 218 Fed. 791 (C. C. A. 8, 1914).SELF V. PRAIRIE OIL & GAS CO., 28 F. 2d 590 (C. C. A. 8,

1928). rev’g 19 F. 2d 481 (C. C. A: 8, 1327), cert. den. 278u. s. 659. - -

SEMINOLE NATION v. UNITED STATES. 78 C. Cls. 455 f 1333) _SENECA NATION v. CHRISTY, 162 U. S. 283 (1696). .SEUFERT v. OLNEY, 193 Fed. 200 (C. C. E. D. Wash. 1911).SEUFERT BROS.- CO. v. UNITED STATES, 249 U. .S 194

(1919) afY’g UNITED STATES es rel. WILLIAMS v. SEU-FERT BROS. CO., 233 Fed. 579 (Dr C. Ore. 1916).

SHARP v. UNITED STATES. 138 Fed. S7S (C. C. A. 8, 1905). .SHARP v. UNITED STATES, 16 ‘F. 2d 876 (C. C. A. 8. 1926),

aff’g Ex parte SHARP, 13 F. 2d 651 (D. C. N. D. Okla. 1926).SHARROCK v. KREIGER, 6 Ind. T. 466. 98 S. W. 161 (1906).SHAW v. GIBSON-ZAHNISER OIL CORP.. 276 U. S. 575 i 1928).SHAWNEE AND DELAWARE INDIANS v: UNITED STATES,

47 C. Cls. 321 (1912).SHAWNEE NAT. BANK v. UNITED STATES, 249 Fed. 583

CC. C. A. 8. .191S 1.SHEbIL v. UNITED STATES, 226 Fed. 184 (C. C. A. 7, 1915).SHELLENBARGER’v. FEWELL, 236 U. S. 68 (1315).SHEPARD v. NORTHWESTERN LIFE INS. CO., 40 Fed. 341

(C. C . E . D . Mich:1883).SHORE v. SHELL PETROLEUM CORP., 60 F. 2d 1 ‘(C. C. A.

10, 1932). aff’g 55 Fe 2d 696, ,cert. den. 287 U. S. 656.SHOSHONE TRIBE OF INDIANS v. UNITED STATES, 299

U. S. 476 (1937), rev’g 82 C. CIs. 23 (1935). s. c. UNITEDSTATES v. SHOSHONE TRIBE, 304 U. S. 111 (1338), 85c. Cls. 331 (1937 ) .

SHULTHIS v. McDOUGAL, 225 U. S. 561 (1912), aff’g 170 Fed.529 (C. C. A. 8. 1909).

SILURIAN OIL CO. v. ESSLEY, 54 F. 2d 43 (C. C. A. 10. 1931).SIMON v. UNITED STATES, 4 Ind. T. 688, 76 S. W. 280 (1903).SING v. SITKA SCHOOL BOARD, 7 Alaska 616 (1. Div. 1927).SIOUX INDIANS v. UNITED STATES, 277 U. S. 424 (1928),

aff’g 58 C. Cls. 302 ( 1923). cert. den. 275 U. S. 528 ( 1927).SIOUX INDIANS v. UNITED STATES, 85 C. Cls. 181 (1937),

cert. den. 302 U. S. 717.SIOUX TRIBE OF INDIANS v. UNITED STATES, 84 C. Cls. 16

(1936), cert. den. 302 U. S. 740.SIOUX TRIBE OF INDIANS v. UNITED STATES, 86 C. Cl.%

299 (193s). cert. den. 306 U. S. 642.SISSETON & WAHPBTON BANDS v. UNITED STATES, 39

C. Cls. 172 (1904). s. c. 42 C. Cls. 416.SISSETON AND WAHPETON BANDS OF SIOUX INDTANS

v. UNITED STATES, 205 U. S. 561 (19OS), aff’g 42 C. Cls. 416(1907). See UNITED STATES v. SISSETON AND WAH-PETON BANDS OF SIOtJX INDIANS, 203 U. S. 561 (19:)x).

SISSETON AND WAHPETON BANDS OF SIOUX INDIANSe v. UNITED STATI%. 277 U. S. 424 (1928). aff’g 5s C. Cis.302 (1923). See SIOUX INDIANS v. UNITED STATES,277 U. S. 424 (1928) _

SITTEL v. WRIGHT, 122 Fed. 434 (C. C. A. 8, 1903).

SMITH 5: ST@YEN$. 10 w~11;~21;(~1870):%lEl.‘lJ .~2.TQN?WCNl& 138 :u. s1:490 .( 18E

’ 2117. SMITH

SlLfJ%‘HSMYTHE v. HENRY, 41 Fed. 705 (C. C. W. D.SN:YDEE’iv.c m’.CH.ER, i 7!IF;. +~p&.~~7- <P-.: ;$iQ@)i$. .T>L:>,! p;y_;_ ,f:!j-Gs .‘. ;zi

,::- ~.. ~^. if .- .z .r. .

soum~N:su~Em cm. ti :OKLAHOMA, 241 :u; s.- 582. (1916).SO~~ESTi~PIPE LlNE ..CO: ir:-‘EMPIRE NATURAL -GAS

CO.,.33.F. 2d 248 (C. C. A. 8,1929), aff’g 2” D 041 “Aai) P. L” ‘+rL.

SOTJ~HWESTER~COAL & IMPROVEklENT-185:xJ.: 5.5499 ,439

CO. v. MCBRIDE,102),.afftg 164 Fed:1097 (C. C. A. 8, 1900).

afPti8,Ii&T:22 3 1xmo):SPALDiNG v.:CHANDT;ER, i69 U. S. 394 (1896) :SP&ARS! v: UNITED STATES, 64 C. Cls. 684 ( 1928) _SPERRY OIL & GASCO. v. CHISHOLM. 264 U. S. 488 .(1924i.

.‘:aff!g-in cart:atid l’ev’g in-part 282 Fe& 92 (C. C. A.-‘8,‘l&j;:s. ;C. 273 Fed. m -( 1921) and 261 U. 5-611 (1923);

SPRINGSTON. vi-WmELER. 3. Ind. T. 388; 58 S. w. 658 (1909).STAFFORD v. UNI’l!ED STATES, 72 F. 2d 847 (C. C. A. 10;....::1934.r; reheariiig’ a&. . ..a@ nom. UNITED STATES v.

MASHUNKASHEY, .73 .F. 2d 487. (C. C. .A. 30, 1934), cert.. ideii:i 294::cU.; SC-‘724 (1934.)... -- See: ,UNITED STATES v.

.-‘l MASHUNKASHEY.;‘.F. 2d 847 (C. C. A.-lo, 1934): ‘. : I:STALEEt?. :ESPENLAUB; 43 .F: 2d 98 ( C; C.. A. .lO, 1930) : aff’g

36 F. .26’91‘, (-D. C.;Kan. 1929). cert. den. 283. U., S. 842.t(lg30); : :: : c

S!l!&N~Pr. v. FOX; 152 .F&I. 697 (C. C. A. 8, 1967j; aff’g._ CAPITAL TOWNSITE CO. v. FOX. 6 Ind. T. 223. 90 3. W.

614 (1906). ipp. ‘diam. 2l5 U. S. 618 (1909). .&%NDLEY~v. .ROBERTS,‘59 Fed. 836 (C. C. A. 8, 1894). app.

‘diSm. i7.Sop. Ct. 999 (1896).STARR v. CAMPBELL, 208 U. S. 527 (1908).STARH’V. LONG JIM.’ 227 U. S. 613 (1913) _STATE OF MISSOURI v. STATE OF IOWA, 7. How: 660~-~‘?~184$)‘, s.:c.‘lO How;-l’(1859) ndd 160 U. S. 688 (1896).

SY~~~?HENS..V.;CHER~KEE NATloN. 174 u. s. 445 (1899).STEPHENS .+.jQuIGLEP. 126 Fed. 148 (C. C. A. 8, i993); afPg

QUIGLEY v. STEPHENS, 3 Ind. T. 265 (1909).STEVENS;ADM’R-v. UNITED STATES, 34 C. Cls. 244 (1899).STEVENSON. v. UNITED.. STATES, 162 U. S. 313 (1896) ,: rev’g--e-t. 86:Fed-~166~C!:C.-A. 5. 1898).STEWART v. &%ES,~29~ U. s. 403 (1935), rehearing den. 296:.: u:s.m (1935).STEWART v. UNITED STATES, 206 U. 9. 185 (1907). .aff’g

.39.C.:Cls. 321 (1964);:STOCKBRIDGE TRIBE OF INDIANS v. UNITED STATES, 61

:‘C. Cl%. 472 (1926). ’STOCKBRIDGE TRIBE OF INDIANS V. UNITED STATES; 63

C. Cls. 268 (1927).STOLTZ v. UNITED STATES, 99 F. 2d 283 (0 C. A. 9. 1938).STONE v. .UNITEfi STATES, 164 U. S. 380 (1896). aff’g 29

-.C..Cls..lll (1894).&TOOKEY v. WILBUR, 58 F. 2d 522 (ADI). D. C. 1932). .TSTROUD V. MISSOURI R. FT. S. & G. i?I CO., 23 Fed. Gas. No.

.1354? (C. C. Kan. 1877).STUART v. TAPP, 81 F. 2d 155 (C. C. A. 10, 1935). rev’g TAPP

v. STUART. 9 F. Supp. 23 (D. C. N. D. Oltla. 1934), s. c. 6 F.supp. 577 (1934).

STUART v. UNITED STATES, 18 Wall. 84 (1873), affg 6 C. Cls111 (1870).

SULLY v. UNITED STATES, 195 Fed. 113 (C. C. S. D. 191f12).SUNDAY v. MALLORY, 248 U. S. 545 (1919), mod’g and’aff’g

237 Fed. 526 (C. C. A. 8, 1916).SUNDERLAND v. UNITED STATES. 266 U. S. 226 (1924). af!?@

: 287 Fed. 468 .(C. C. A. 8, 1923).SUPERCvigrK, 271 U. S. 643 (1926). affg 3 F. 2d 90 (ipp

- :

;.

TAYLOR +;. BROWN 147 U.-S:640 (1893). .\FAYLOR v. HAND, 7 How. 572 (1849).l!AY.LOR v! JONES, 51 F. 2d.892. (C. C. A. 10, 1931),.c&den.

284 U. S. 663 ( 1931) .TAYLOR +: PARKER. 235 17. S. 42 (1914).TAYLOR v.. SOUTHERLAND, 7 Ind. ‘j?. 666, 164 S.- W; 87$

Jlgp7). :yy ;:.. -.l!AY+OR‘v. TAmIEN, 51 F.-2a 884 (C. C. A. 10,193l) ;certi+$

.:28&U. S:6’72 (1931). 8 ./. .j .;.-TAYLOR~v;’ UNITED STATES, 6 Ind. T. $51, 98 S. W. l!&

(1906). I -:-: ~TAYLOR v;%NI&D STATES; 193 Fed. 968 (C. C. k9; 19121.TAYLOR,v.- UNITED STATES, 230 Fed. 580 (C. C. A. 8, 1916).TAYLOR v; UNITED STATES; 44 -F. 2d 31 (Cz C. A 9.1930).TERRILL v:UNITED STATES. 35 C: Cl% 218 (1990): . :TERRITORY : v.: DELINQUENT. TAX LIST, 12 N: M. l39; 76-.::p& 367 (1964). ..‘. ~i>.,il!E,$RITORY OF ALASKA Vi AmE Is’ixANJj &%INti

CO.. 289 Fed. 671 (C C. A. 9,1923), cert. den. 263 U. S: 708( 1 9 2 3 ) .

TERRITORY. OF ARIZONA v. DELINQUENT TAX LIST, 3Ariz. 302 (18911, 26 -Pac. 310, aff’d sub nom. MARICOPA&PHOENIX R. R. v. ARIZONA. 156 U. S. 347 (1895).

TERRiTORY OF MONTANA v. GUYOTT. 9 Mont. 46. 22 Pac..134 (-1889).

TERRITORY OF OREGON v. COLEMAN, 1 Ore. 191 (1855).TEXAS CO. v. CENTRAL FUEL .OIL CO., 194 Fed. 1 (C. C; A.

8, 1912); :

THAYER v. UNrTED STATES; 20 C. Cls. 137 (l&35).THEB~~vi~~;@rAW TRIBE OF INDIANS; 66 Fed. 372 (C. Cl

-. -, --__,_THOMAS v. GAY, 169 U. S. 264 (1898) _THOMAS vi.SASS,‘3 lnd. T. 545, 64 S. W. 531 (1991) : a. c.4

Ind. T. 336, 69 .% W. 894 (1902).TH05;$SON v. MCLAUGHLIN, 7 Ind. T. 1 (1907), 103 S. W.

TH08M~g~.~ v: WILLIAM.& RHOADES, 206 Fed. 895 (C. C. &

THO&$ON’v. UNITED STATES, 35 C. Cls. 395 (1900).THOMPSON .v. MORGAN, 4 Ind. T. 412, 69 S; W. 926 (1962).THOMPSON v. UNITED STATES, 44 C. Cls. 359 (1909).THREDGILL v. PIWARD, 12 How. 24 (1851).THURSTON v. UNITED STATES, 232 U. S. 469 (1914).TIGER v. FEWELL, 22 F. 2d 786 (C. C. A. 8, 1927); cert. den.

269 U. S. 572 (1926). writ of error dism. 271 U. S. 649 (1926);cert. den. 276 U. S. 629.

TIGER v. SLINKER. 19 F. 2d 35 (C. C. A. 8. 1927). aff’g 4 .F-2d 714 (D. C. E. D. Okla. 1925).

TIGER v. TWIN STATE OIL CO.. 48 F. 2d 509 (C. C. A. 10,1931), aff’g KEhlOHAH v. SN.4FFER OIL AND REFIN-ING CO, 38 F. 2d 66-7 ID. C. N. D. Okla. 1930).

TrGER.v. WESTERN INVESTMENT CO., 221 U. S. 286 (1911).TILLER v. UNITED STATES, 34 F. 2d 398 (C. C. A. 10, 1929).TINKER v, MIDLAND VALLEY CO., 231 .U. S. 681 (1914).+Oo%LE v. &cCLELLhN, 7 Ind. T. 64, 103 6. W. 766 (1997).TOWN$@D v.. UNITED STATES, 265 Fed. 519 (C. C. A- 8,

,1929).;TOY TOY v. HOPKINS, 212 u. S. 542 (1969).

UNITED STATES v. ‘.AARON; 183 Fed. 347 (C. C. W. D. Okla.1910). s. c. 204 .Fed. 943. c

UNITED STATES v. ABRAM%;194 Fed. 52 (C. C. A. 8, 1912).aff’p 181 Fed. 847 (C. C:.E.;D. Okla. 1910).

UNITEfi STATES v. BLASti PACKER’S ASS’N., 79 Fed. 1%(C. C. Wash. 1897), app. dism. 19 Sup. Ct. 881 (1899).

UNITED STATES .v.: ALBERTY, *24 Fed. Cas. No. 14426 (C. CArk. 1844). 1

UNITED STATES v. ALGODONES LAND CO., 52 F. 2d 35:(C. C. A. 10. 1931).

UNI’&D- STAeES ;v:. ‘ALGOMA LUMBER CO., 305 U. S. 41f(1939). rev’g 86.C. Cls. 226; 188. 171.

UNITED STATES. v. ALIRE. 73 j U. S. 573 (1867). rev’g 1 CCls. 233 (1865). ,.; ’ :

-

UNIT%,-STATES’-.v.v. *&LEN, 36 Fea. 174 (C. C. E.’ D. MO----,

UNITED STATE% v. ALLEN. .179 Fed. 13 (C. C. A. 8, 1910)rev’g 171 FecL 907 (C. C. E. D. Okla. 1909). mod. 224 U. S413,-rev’d sub no& .MULLEN v: UNITED STATES, 221U. S. 448, mod. 224 U. S. 458, mod. 224 U. S. 471.

UNITED STATES v. AMO., 261 Fed. 106 (D. C. W. D. Wis1919 1.

UNITED STATES v. ANDERSON, 228 U. S. 52 (1913). rev’g 1%Fed. 262 (D. C. Ore. 1911):

UNITED STATES v. ANDERSON, 225 Fed. 825 (D. C. E. D. Wis1915).

UNITED STATES v.. ANDilEWS, 179 U. S. 96 (1900),UNITED STATES v. ASHFORD, 99 F. 2d 946 (C. C. A. 8

1938).UNITED STATES v. ASHTON, 170 Fed. 5O9 (C. C. W. D. Wash

1909), app.. dism. sub’nom. BIRD v. ASHTON, 220 U. -S604, (1911), without opinion.

UNITED STATES v. ATKINS, 260 U. S. 220 (1922), aff’g 26.Fed. 923 (C. C. A. 8, 1920).

UNITED STATES v. AUGER, 153 Fed. 671 (C. C. W. D. Wis1967), app. dism. 170 Fed. 1@21 (C. C. -4. 7, 1908). witbouopinion.

UNITED STATES v. BAILEY, 24 Fed. Cas. No. 14495 (C. CTerm. l&34).

UNITED STATES v. BAKER, 4 Ind. T. 544, 76 S. W. 10(1993).

UNITED STATES v. BARNABY, 51 F%d. 20 (C. C. Mont. 1892)UNITED STATES v. BARYETT, 7 F. Supp. 573 (D. C. N. C

Okla. 1934).UNITED STATES v. BARNHART. 17 Fed. 579 (C. C Or@. 18SRIUNITED srA~Es V. BARNHART; 22 led. ~‘8.5 (c. C: Ore: iGY;iUNITED STATES v. BARTLETT, 235 U. S. 72 (1914). aff

BARTCETT v. UNITED STATES, 203 Fed. 410 (C. C. A8. 1913).

UNITED Sl’ATES v. BEAN, 253 Fed. 1 (C. C. A. 8, 1918).UNITED STATES v. BEEBE. 2 Dak. 29’1, 11 N. W. ,Xlc, (1880)UNITED STATES v. BELLM, 182 Fed. 161 (C. C. E. D. Okle

1910).UNITED STATES v. BELT, 1;s Fed. 68 (D. C. M. D. Pa. 1904)UNITED STATES v. BENEWAH COC’XTY, 290 Fed. 62

CC. C. A. 9. 1923 )UNIT&D STATES V: BERfiIGAN, 2 Ala&a 442 (3 Div. 1905)UNITED STATES v. BERRY, 4 Fed. 779 (D. C. &lo. 1886)UNITED STATES y. BICHARD & CO., 1 Ariz. 31, 25 Pac. 51

(1871).

621

UNITED STATES %.‘:B%RDSkLIj;“233: U. ‘S. 223 (lY14). rev’g206 Fed. 818 ( DXX N.>D:-Iowa 1913 ) ;’ 3 See UNITED STATES

v. VAN;WER’&7- U:;s;@&-~~$)li$)( : .: :“5’:. : ‘- *UNITED SrATES v. BLACK, 247.F’ed. 942 (C. C. A. 8, 1913).JNITED ST4TES.v. BLACKFEATHER, 155 U. S. 180 (1894).

rev’g BLACKFEATHER; $.‘.UNITED STATES, ‘28 C. Cls.447 .(1893). \

UNITED. STATES~V. BG&RD OF.COMMISSIONERS, 26 F. Supp.270 (D. C . N . D. O k l a . 1939);. - ._

JNITl@ STATES‘ .+‘BOAR-ti :OF- COM’RS OF. COMANCHEI$XXJm.y, OKLA;, 6 F. $upp: 401 (-D. C. ,W. D. Okla..1934).

UNITED STATES’v;‘BO&RD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS’ OF rOSAGE, COUNT?iZ’QKL.&:;i 267.,U. S. 587 (1925). sff’e

per cur. 1 -Fe 2d 701 ‘(C. C. A.-& 1924), s. c 244 U. -ti: 663. . (1917); dlS.:Fed.i853 (C.:O.,A;‘S,-1914),:193 Fed. 485 (C. Cri. WN:D:OkhX 1911),.s.‘c.254 :Fed..570 XC. C. A. 8, 1918).

~&TED STATESV.:BOARD:OE CO_UNTY;GOM*RS OF GRAYCOiJNTY. OKLA,-54.F. 2d 593 (C. C:, & 10, 1931).

JNITED.IISTATES~:.~~ BOARD, ioF -&MMISSI~NERS OFMCINTOSH COUNTY, 284 Fed. 103 (C. C. A; 8.1922). fig iUNITED STATES v. STUCKEY, 271 Fed. 747. (D. C. 1. D.OkIa. 1921), app.’ dism. 263 U. S. 691.

UNITED STATES v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM’RS, 13 F. Supp.641 (D. C. N. D. Okla. 1936).

JNITED‘ STATES v. BOARD bF NAT. MISSIONS OF PRES-BYTERIAN CHURCH, 37 F. 2d 272 (C. C. A. 10, 1929).

UNITED STATES v. BOND, 108 F. 2d 504 (C. C. A. 10, 1339),aff’g BOND v. TOM; 25 F.. Supp. 157 (D. C. N. D. Okl&1938 ) .

JNITED STATES v.. BONFESS, 125 Fed. 485 (C. C. A. 8,1963).UNITED STATES v. BOSS, 160 Fed. 132 (D. C. Utah, 1906).UNITED STATES v. BOWLING, 256 U. S. 484 (1921). rev’g 261

i Fed. ‘657 (D. C., E. D. N. Y. 1919). s. c. 299 Fed. 438 (1924).UNITED STATES v. BOYD, 68 Fed. 577 (C. C. W. D. N. C.

1895). ~UNITED STATES v. BOYD. 83 Fed. 547 (C. C. A. 4, 1897).3NlTED STATES v. BOYLAN 265 Fed. 165 (C. C. A. 2. 1920).

aff’g ,256 Fed. 468 (D. C. N. D. N. Y. 1919). app. dkm. giU.. &,614 (1921).

UNITED STATES v. BOYNTON, 53 F. 2d 297 (C. C. A. 9, 1931).rev’g 49 J?. 2d 810 (D. C:W. D. Wash. 1931).

UNITED STATES v. BRAVE BEAR. 3 Dak. 34, 13 N. W. 565(1881):

UNITED STATES v. BRENTS. 233 17. S. 223 (1914). SeeUNITED STATES v. BIRDSALL, 233 U. S. ‘723 (1914).

UNITED STATES v. BRIDLEMAN. 7 Fed. 8991 (D. C. Ore.1881) .

UNITED STATES v. BRINDLE, 110 U. S. 688 (1884).UNITED SrATEd v. BROOKFIELD E’ISHERIES, 24 F. Supp.

712 (D. C. Ore. 1938).DNITED STATES v. BItOOKS. 10 How. 442 (18.50).UNITED STATES v. BROWN, s F. 2d 564 (C. C. A. 8; 1925), cert.

den. 270 U. S. 644 (1926).UNITED STATES v. BROWN, 15 F. 2d 565 (D. C. N. D. Okla.

1926 1.UNITED STATES v. BUCKLES, 6 Ind. T. 319, 97 S. W. 1622

IlCOfi).\ - - _ - , .UNITED’ STATES v. CADZOW, 5 Alaska 125 (4 Div. 1914).UNITED STATES v. CAIN-BONNESS LUMBER & TIMBER

CO., 215 Fed. 212 (D. C. W. D. Wash.l914)UNITED STATES v. CALIFORNIA & OREGON LAND CO.,

192 U. .S. 355 (1903), rev’g UNITED STATES v. OREGONCXNTRAL MLLLTARY ROAD CO., lOZ&Fed. M9 (C. C. Ore.1900 ) .

UNITED STATES v. CANDELARIA, 271 U. S. 432 (1926).UNITED STATES v. CARDISH, 145 Fed. 2r1 (D. C. E. D.

Wis. 1906), s. c. 143 Fed. 61_0 (D. C. E. I). Wis. 1906).UNITED STATES 8. CARPENTER, 111 U S. :<17 (lS84).IINCTED S I’ATES v. CARR. 2 Mont. 234 (137.5i).UNlTF:D STATES v. CAIISCiN, 19 F. Supp. ~lti-(~. C. N. D. Okla.

1937). app. clisw. 96 I?. 2ri 1023.UNlTED STATES v. CASS. 240 red. 617 (C. C. A. S, 1917).UNITED STATl:S v. CASl%:R. 271 Fed. 615 CC. (:. A. 8. 1921).

app. dism. 257 U. S. 666 (1621)., I.

UNITED STATES v. CELESTIKG, 215 U. S. 278 (1909).UNlT15D STATES v. CERTAIN PROPElt’l‘Y (See UNITED

STATES v. BICH.%RD R: CO.).UNITED STATES v. CHAI(LES. iB F. Supp. 346 (D. C. W. D.

N. Y. 10381.UNITED S’i’A+ES V. CHASE, 245 U. S. 8 9 (1917)) rev’g 222

Fed. 593 (C. C. A. 8, 1915), cert. granted, 241 U. S. 669(1916).

UNI’PED : STATES v. i~~A~TO;KAH1NA-PE-SHA,. 25~:?L-~O.?~~t%kr.$~ (Snperipf~~;C,onr,t, A.rk. ;1824) i L ;:..

Fed. Gas.

UNITED STATES. v. GH&VEZ;-:I’IS!u.; S:-:5t)9i :(l899j; s: e. 175: T .:u;. se GJF#J ‘i )’ I., c: +.;. p.3. 2. :: .;I,>;., , ( ‘/,,‘.i J / ,;UNITED STATES .v: ‘?%&‘EZ;299.1u. S. 357 il933) _UNITED STATESv. CHEHALIS COUNTY; 217 ,Fed. 281 (D. C.

W. D. Wash. isi4).,UN1TED:STATES.v. CHER#KEE rNATION, 202 U. S. 101 ( 1906).

s. c. 220 u. s. 84, 225.u. s. 576:‘:1.( .: i ‘i i _’ :UNI’SED~iSTA~~S:~~~~~OaTB;I1W:i-NAT~ON,i 179 :.u. i S. 494

i ?..(1g@J)i, .<I .?;...‘.;ri<) ::i:;* .‘l<!i!S ..; ;-! : ?::;; ,&JNITED’:ST&TES ~~‘:~CHOCTA~~!NaTION; “38: -C.’

L , .Cl.& ‘- 558

-; i!:(1903); affd%ub noti CHICKASAW ;FREEDMEN, 193 u. S.:;.; 1x5 (lgo4);. _ >:I!:! . . . . 1. .y: ‘> :!.I .: .’

UNITED.!STATES.. v, i.0%%&RRON :RIVER :0IL CO., 29 F. 2d873 t(C.‘.C:. A!: 8;lQ27):,:cert: ded:. sub nom: RIV’ERSIDE OIL

:<c: -&REFINING :GO:~:V::CIMARRON .RIVER :OIL CO. et &I.,275 U.S.:552 (l92’7I:,$ ,.‘,- !‘.: .-: -..: ,.

UNITEDI STATESiv.i’dISNA, 125?Fed. Gas:. No. 14795 (C. C.,j: Ohi~-@35)~. .L _:: :-“.: ‘1 : ’

UNI!j?ED.STATES: v: CLAPOX; 35 Fed. 575.‘(D. 0. Ore., 1888).UNITED STATES v. COHN;2 IndT. 474, 52 S. W. 38 (1899).UNI’I’I’~; STATES .v: .COLVARD, 89 F. 2d 312 (C. C. A. 4,

---. ,_

UNITED STATES v: COMET OIL AND GAS CO., 262 Fed.819 (e: C. A . 8 , 1913);‘.rev’g 187 F e d . 674 (C. C. E . D .Okla: 1 9 1 1 ) .

hITED STATES V.. CONWAY, 175 U. S. 60 (1899).UNITED STATES v. COOK, 225 Fed. 756 (C. C. A. 8, 1915). _UNITED STATES v.~ COOK, 19 Wall, 591 ( 1873).UNITED STATES v: CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT,

etc.i 101 F:2d 156 (C. C. A. 10, 1939).UNITED STATES. v. ,CRAWFORD, 47 Fed. 561 (C. C. WV. D.

Ark., 1891).UNITED STATES v. CREEK NATION, 302 u. s. 620 (1938),

rev!g .84~C.:.CIs. 12, a c. 295 U: S: 103 (1935), rev’g 77 C.: : Gls.l59 (1933) ; rehearing,den: 295 U. S. 769 (1935).

UNITED STATES v. DAVIS, 188 Fed. 383 (C. C. Minn. 1911).See UNITED STATES v. PARK LAND CO., 188 Fed. 38.3(C. :C!.’ Minn. 1911) :

UNITED STATES v. DAWSON, 15 How. 467 (1853).UNITED STATES v. DEBELL, 227 Fed. ‘766 (C. C. A. 8, 1915).UNITED STATES v. DEHELL, 227 Fed. ‘Ii’1 (C. C. A. 8, 1915).UNITED STATES v. DEBELL, 227 Fed. 775 (C. C. A. 8, 1915).UNITED STA’I’ES v. DETROIT FIRST NAT. BANK, 234 U. S.

245 (1914), aff’g 208 Fed. 988 (C. C. A. 8, 1913).UNITED STATES v. DEWEY COUNTY, S. D. 14 F. 2d 784

(D. C: S. Dak. 1926), atI’d sub nom. DEWEY COUNTY,S. D. v. UNITED STATES. 26 F. 2d 434 (C. C. A. 8, 1928),cert. den. 278 U. S. 649 (1928).

UNITED STATES v. DOOLEY, 151 Fed. 697 (C. C. E. D. Wash.-’ 1 9 0 6 ) .

UNITED STATES v. DOUGLAS, 190 Fed. 482 (C. C. A. 8,1 9 1 1 ) . r

UNITED STATES v. DOWDEN, 220 Fed. 277 (C. C. A. 8, 1915).aff’g 194 Fed. 475 (C. C. E. D. Okla. 1911), app. dism. 242u. s. 661.

UNITED STATES v. DOWNING, 25 Fed. Cas. No. 14991 (D. C.Kan. 1876).

UNITED STATES v. DUNN, 288 Fee. 158 (C. C. A. 8, 1923),mod. 268 U. S. 121 (1925).

UNITED STATES v. DUVAL, 25 Fed. Cas. No. 15015 (D. C. E. D.Penn. 1833). .

UNITED STATES v. EARL, 17 Fed. 75 (C. C. Ore. 1883).UNITED STATES.v. EASTERN COAL B MINING CO., 66 F

2d 923 (Cl. C A: 10, 1933).UNIT;;) STATES v. ELLIS, 51 Fed. 808 (D. C. W. D. Ark

UNITNE; Sl’I;ES v. ELM, 25 Fed. Cas. No. 15048 (D. C. N. D

uNITED”STATES v. EQUITABLE TRUST CO., 283 U. S. 738(1931). mod’g 34 F. 2d 916 (C. C. A. 2, 1929), s. c. 280u. s. 550.

UNITED STATES v. ESTIT,L, 62 F. 2d 620 (C. C. A. 10, 1932)UNITED STATES v. EWING. 47 Fed. 809 (D. C. S. D. 1891)UNITED STATES v. FAIRBANKS, 171 Fed. 337 (C. C. A. 8

1969). atI’d 223 U. S. 215 ( 1912).UNITED STATES v. FERNANDEZ, 10 Pet. 303 (1836).UNITED STATES v. FERGUSON, 247 U. S. 175 (1918)) aff’g 225

Fed. 974 (C. C. A. 8, 1915).UNITED STATES v. FERRY COUNTY, WASHINGTON, 24 F

Supp. 399 (D. C. E. D. Wash. 1938).

UNITED STATES. v. FIDELITY TRUST : CO.. 121’ Fed 766~,:~.(Cr C.,A.t9;1$@3). > i .?iiv. ;:-: t. >;.Iz ,.; :.:L .i< j :

UNITED STATES v: FIRST INATIONAL .BANK;.234‘ U: S: 245“(fgl4)*.aff’p 3n* Pnrl cm* In r-3 “A ‘o’ilnlf),- i._,

5 G”” . =.A. 0”” I”. “- ~.iO,~IUL3,. :

‘ES v. FIRST NAT. BANK, 282 Fed. 330 ID. C.UNITED STATE. D. Wash. 1922). :. ;-

UNITED STATES v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF DECATUR, NEB.,56 F. 2d 634::(D.,$C. .Neb. 1931), :aff’d~FIRST. NAT. BANK

OF DECATUR; NEB. V:UNlTED’.STATES. 59’F. 2d 367.UNITED STATES V: FITZGERALD, 201 .Fed. 295 (0. c. A. 8,

,1912). ::: .i ,.;..T .:.;;:! :. .; k ii,<,. .: 1:. , :

UNITED STATES -:v: FLOURNOY:!LIVESTOCK and -REALESTATE CO., 69 Fed. 886 (C. C. Neb.

.: :576 (Cl. C. Neb. 1896); i, -I ‘:-:.1895) ; s. c. 71 .Fed.

UNITED STATES v. FLYNN, 25 Fed. Gas. No. 15124 (C. C. Minn.-l&q(j). : / -; ,, :;,‘_. :

JNITED STATES v. FOOSHEE, 225 Fed. 521 -(U:.& A. 8. 1915).UNITED STATES v. FORREST LUMBER CO., 305 U. S. 415

::(1939): See IJNITED STATES v. ALGOMA LUMBER CO.;305 U. S. 415 (1939).

UNITED STATES v. FT. SMITH ‘& W. R. CO., 195 Fed. 211’(C. C. A. 8, 1912).

UNITED STATES v.- FORTY-EIGHT .POUNDS OF RISINGSTAR TEA, 35 Fed. 403 (D. C. N. D. Cal. 188&J, aff’d38 Fed. 466 (C. C. N. D. Cal. 1889).

UNITED STATE% v: FORTY THREE GALLONS OF WHISKEY,93 U. S. 188 (1876), rev’g 25 Fed. Cas. No. 15136 (D. C.M i n n . 1 8 7 4 ) .

UNITED STATES v. FORTY-THREE GALLONS OF WHISKEY,108 u. S. 491 (1883).

UNITED STATES v. FOSTER, 25 Fed. Gas. No. 15141 (Cl. C.E. D. Wis. 1870).

UNITED STATES v. 4.450.72 ACRES OF LAND, CLEARWATERCOUNTY, MINN., 27 F. Supp. 167 (D. C. Minn. 1939);

UNITED STATES v. FOUR BOTTLES SOUR-MASH WHES-KEY, 96 Fed. 720 (D. C. Wash. 1898).

UNITED STATES v. FRANK BLACK SPOTTED HORSE,282 Fed. 349 (D. C. S. D. 1922).

UNITED STATES v. GARDNER, 133 Fed. 285 (C. C. A. 9.1904).

UNITED STATES v. GARDNER, 189 Fed. 690 (D. C. E. D. Wis.1911).

UNITED STATES v. GETZELMSN, 89 F. 2d 531 (C. C. A. 10,1937), cert. den. 302 U. S. 708.

UNITED STATES v. GLACIER COUNTY, 17 F. Supp. 411(D. C. Mont. 1936), mod. 99 F. 2d 733 (1938).

UNITED : STATES v. GORHAM. 165 U. S. 316 (1897). aiI’g- - _--~-._

GORHAM v. UNITED STAT&. 29-c. & 97 ii894’j. -- -UNITED STATES v. GRAY, 201 Fed. 291 (C. C. A. 8, 1912).UNITED STLWES v. GRAY, 284 Fed. 163 (C.- C. A. 8, 1922).

aff’g 271 Fed. 747 (D. C. E. D. Okla. 1921), app. dism. 263u. s. 689.

UNITED STATES v. GYPSY OIL CO., 10 F. 2d 487 (C. C. A. 8.1925).

LJNI;gE$.STATES v. HADDOCK, 21 F. 2d 165 (C. C. A. 8,

UNI~s’~)~STATES v. HADLEY, 99 Fed. 437 (Cl. C. Wash.

UNITED ‘STATES v. HALE, 51 F. 2d 629 (C. C. A. 10, 1931),rev’g 39 F. 2d 188 (D. C. N. D. Okla. 1930).

UNITED STATES v. HALL, 171 Fed. 214 (D. C. E. D. Wis.1969).

UNITED STATES v. HALSELL, 247 Fed. 390 (C. C. A. 8,19J.B).

UNITED STATES v. HARRIS, 293 Fed. 3S9 (C. C. A. 8, 1923),aff’e 265(1922).

Fed. 261 (C.Fed.

C. A. 8. 1910). ODD. dism. 257 U. S. 623s. c. 286 910 (C. i=. A. 8, 1923).

UNITED STATES v. HARRIS, 100 F. 2d 268 (C. C. A. 9, 1938),rehearing den.. 103 F. 2tI 1020.

UNITED STATES v. HAWKiNS. 217 Fed. 11 (C. C. A. 8, 1914).See IOWA LAND & TRUST CO. v. UNITED STATES, 217Fed. 11 (C. C. A. 8, 1914 )

UNITED STATES v. HAYES, 20 F. 2d 873 (C. C. A. 8, 1927),cert. den. 275 U. S. 555.

UNITED STATES v. HEALY. 202 Fed. 349 (D. C. Mont. 1913).UNITED STATES v. HEINRICII, 16 F. ?d 112 (C. C. A. 9,

3.926), aff’g 12 F. 2d 938 (D. C:. Mont. 1926).UNITED S T A T E S V . HEIRS OF ‘RILLLEUX, 1 4 ROW. 1 8 9

(1852).UNITED STATES v. HEMMER, 241 U. S. 379 (1916), aff’g 204

Fed. 898 (C. C. A. 8, 1912).

. ..-\ . ; I.,_:, :: _;. - .:..-‘. .,

.‘i .: _”

-TABLE. OF FEDERAL CASES 623

UNITED STATES .v. ~HEYFRON.:l38 Fed. 964 (C. .C.: Mont.1905). -’ . ‘.- ., :‘i/ :,

UNITED STATES i v: .+HEYFRON,!jl3&‘ed. &8 : (Cl. Cl. i Mont._.. .y: :flg@i).“ , L :. ./__( .‘,.f “;,- 1.. .( i T -rr:l:i ‘xfy’f;’ ! , ‘..! r: ‘.

IJNI!I’I’)~STATES v. HIGGINS~‘~l93‘ Fed. 348 (C. ‘C:. Mont.. . . ,,,-,.,. :: /,..a: _

UNPI9Iy) :STATES v: ,.HIGGINS,. 110 : Fed. .609: (C. C. Mont.

UNITED STATES v: -HINKLE, 261 Fed. 518 -(C., Cl A. 8, 1919).UNITED STATE%? HOLLIDAY, 3tWall. 407< ( 1865 ) . ’UNITED STATES v. --HOLT STATE BANK, 270 .U. Xl.. 49

-“:?(19’26), tfff’g,2$)4?F& 181”(~~-~~~;1~3)-~r.ri,~~‘. .: . ‘:i ; j ,: jUNITED, STATES: v. :HOMERATH& X0 Ii’. .:2d :395 .(D. C: W. -I).

Okla.!1930)‘, a@p.:dism.49 Ii? 2d 1086. UNITED STATES.v:HOWARD, 17 Fed. 638 (C..G.‘&.l883).UNITED. STATES .v. HOVVARD, 8 CF.-ISuppl:617. (D. C. N. D.

: . ..Okia. 1934). ,‘: 1;’ a, _,: i ‘;,. ..; ;s,’ ;& ‘: !; - I”UNITED STATES v. HOYT, 167 Fed. 301 (C. 1 C. .A. 9, 1900),

aff’g 158 Fed, 162(C. C: E.D. Wash; l9Oi’);. I :-UNITED STATES v. .HUGHES, .6 .F.‘Supp. 972 ‘(D. C. N. D.

Okla. 1934). : ‘, : .,

UNITED STATES v. HUMASON, 26 Fed. Gas. No. 15420 (C. C.Ore. 1879). s. c. 26 Fed. Cas. No. 15,421.

UNITED STATES v. HUNTER, 21 Fed. 615 (Cl. C. E. D. Nis-so&i, 1884).

UNITED STATES v. HURSHMAN; 53 Fed. ‘543. (D. C. Wash.lmz).

UNITED STATES v. HUTCHINGS, 25’2 Fed. 841 (D. C. W. D.Okla. 1018), aff’d-sub nom. CONMISSIONERS v. UNITEDSTATES, 270 Fed. 110 (C: C. ,A. 8, 1920)) app. dism. 26(1

u. s. 7,s.UNITED STATES v. HUTTO, No. 1, 256 U. S. 524 (1921).UNITED STATES v. H&TO, No. 2, 256 U. S. 530 (1921).UNITED STATES v. INABA, 291 Fed. 416 (D.-C. E. .D. Wash.

1923 ) .UNITED STATES v. IVY. 26 Fed. Gas. No. 15451 (C. C. Ark-l@J3)*-.: , ’ I

UNITED STATES v. JACKSON, 280 U. S. lti (1030), r&g27 E. 2d751 (D. 0. N. D. Cal., 1028). s. C. 38 F. 2d 1621.

UNITED STATES v. JACOBS, 195 Fed. 707 (C. C. A: 8,. 1912),UNITED STATES .v. JOHNSON, 53 F. 2d 267 (D. C. W. D.

Wash. 1031).UNITED STATES v. JOHNSON, 87 F. 2d 155 (C. C. A. 10

1936). aff’g 11 F. Supp. 897 (D. C. N. D. Okla. 1935).UNITED STATES v. JOSEPH, 9-, U. S. 614 (1876)) affg UNITEC

STATES v. VARELA. 1 N. M. 593 11674).UNITED. STATES v. JOYCE, 240 Fed. 610 (C. C. A. 8, 1917)UNITED STATES v. KAGAMA, 118 U. S. 375 (1886).UNITED STATES v. KEMPF, 171 Fed. 1021 (D. C. E. D. Wis

1909).UNITED STATES v. KIE, 26 Fed. Cas. No. 15528a (D. C

Alaska 1885). s. c. 26 Fed. Cas. No. l.5528b; 27 Fed. 351.UNITED STATESx: .KILGORE, 111 F. 2d 665 (C. C. A. 10

1940) rev’g 27 F. Supp. 1 (D. C. W. D. Okla. 1939).UNITED STATES v. KING, 81 Fed. 625 (D. C. E. D. Wis.‘l807)UNITED STATES v. KIYA, 126 Fed. 879 (D. C. N. D. 1903)UNITED STATES v. KLAMATH INDIANS, 304 U. S. 119 (1935)

s. c. 296 U. S. 244.UNITED STATES v. KNIGHT. 206 Fed. 145 (Cl. C. A. 8. 1913)UNI’fEIZSTATES . v: KNOWLTON, 3 Dak. 58, 13 N. W. 573

UNITED STATES v. KONKAPOT, 43 Fed. 64 (Cl. Cl. Wis1 8 9 0 ) .

UNITED STATES v. KOPP. 110 Fed. 160 (D. C. Wash. 1901)UNITED STATES v. LADLEY. 51 F. 2d 756 ID. C. Idaho

1931). s. c. 42 F. 2d 474, 4 F. Supp. 580 (D. C‘Idabo, 1933)UNITED STATES v. LAMM LUMBER CO., 305 U. S. 415 (1939)

See UNITED STATES v. ALGOM.4 LUMBER CO., 305 U. S415 (1939).

UNITED STATES v. L&4 MOTTE. 67 F. 2d 788 (C. C. A. 101933 ) .

UNITED STATES v. LA PLANT, 200 Fed. 02 (D. C. S. D1911).

UNITED STATES v. LA ROQUE. 198 Fed. 645 (C. C. A. 81912). aff’d sub nom. LA ROQUE v. UNITED STATES239 U. S. 62 ( 1015).

UNITED STATES v. LAW. 2<50 Fed. 218 (C. ‘C. A. 8, 1918)s. C. UNITED STATES v. SMITH, 258 Fed. 356 (C. C. A8, 1923), rev’g 270 Fed. 136 (D. C. E. D. Okla. 1922).

UNITED STATES v. LEATHERS, 26 Fed. Cas. No. 15581 (D. CNev. 1879).

UNITED STATES v. LE BRIS, 121 U. S. 278 (1887).

UNITED STATES v. LEE, 108 F. 2d ,936 (C. :X%X:10, ‘1930).aB’g 24 F.. Sup@.’ 814 (D:;C. E.‘D. ‘Okla: 1938):.‘L’i.:f:$ li .: :: -

UNITED STATES v., LENA, ,261 :Fed. 144 .tC.XXAii& 1019) .:. : : :UNITED STATES ‘v. LESLIE:- 167.;Fed.* 67OfC.1 ,C! S. D.- 1909).U~~ITED STATES v. LEwI~;‘~ Ind.,T. 1,*76‘s: w399 (i903j.UNITED STATES v.- LEWIS, 253 Fed. 469 (D. ?C. S. D. Cal.

1918).UNITED STATES v. LEWIS COUNTY, IDA& .,5 F .2d 236

(C. C. A. 9, 1938), mod’g 16 F. Supp. 267 (D. &Idaho; 1036),rehearing den; 95,F. 2d 238 (C. 0. A..9,:1938): :,- -I

UNITED STATES v. s LINDAHL, 221’ Fed. ,143. .(D. C. IMont.1915). ‘-,.r :.li.: / .._ ,.,. :i I> *. \ ‘;,.a. :,,

UNITED STATES v. LOGAN, 105 Fed. ,240 (C:: Cl: Gre.:1969) :UNITED .STATES .v. LOVING, 34 Fed. ,715 (D:“C.! N: :D;. Tex.

:1888). : / :UNITED STATES v. LUCERO, i:N; M: 422, (1869). :UNITED S,TATES v. .LUTHER, ’ 266’. Fed. 579. .(D. C. -E:. D.

Okla.1019). . . : :r , : .:; :. __UNITED STATES v. LYNCH, 7 ~Alaska.568 (l.Dlv. ‘1027).UNITED STATES v. McBRATNEY. 104 U. S: 621 (X381)..UNITED. STATES v; MoCLANE, 74’ Fed. 153 (C.. d‘-Ore;.1806).UNITED STATES v. MCDOUGALL’S ADM’R., 121‘ U. S. 89

(l&37), s. c. 110 u. s. 477.UNITED STATES v. MCGOWAN, 62 F. 2d 055 (C. C. A. 9,

1933), aff’d. Peru cur. 280 U: S. 592 (1933) ; s: c. 2 .F: Supp.426. - - _ .

UNITED STATES v. MoGOWAN, 302 U. S. 535 (1938), rev’g 89F. 2d 201 f%. C. A. 9, 1937), aff’g UNITED STATES v. ONECHEVROLET SEDAN, 16 F. Supp. 453 (D. C. .Nev. 1936),s. c. 302 U. S. 666. .

UNITED STATES v. McGUGIN, 28 F. 2d 76 (D. C..Kan. 1928).UNITED STATES v. McINTIRE, 101 F. 2d 650 (C. C. A. 9,

1939). rev’g McINTIRE v. UNITED STATES, 22 F. Supp.316 (D. C. Mont. l937). .

UNITED STATES v. McMURRAY, 181 Fed. 723 (Cl. Cl. E. D.Okla. 1910).

UNITED STATES v. MACKEY, 216 Fed. 126 i0. CL.& 8. ‘1014),s. c. 214 Fed. 137.

UNITED STATES v. MARES, 14 N., M.,l, 88 Pacl.1128 (1907).UNI~g?Z& STATES v. MARSHALL, 210 Fed. 595 (C. C. A. 8,

UNITED STATES v. MARTIN, 14 Fed. 817, (D. C. Ore. 1883)‘ s. c.17 Fed. 150.

UNITED STATES v. MARTIN, 45 F. 2d 836 (D. C. E. D. Okla.1930).

UNITED STATES v. MARTINEZ, 195 U. S. 460 (1904).UNITED STATES. v. MASHUNKASHEY, 72 F. 2d t%7 (C. C. A.

10, 1934), rehearing den. 73 F. 2d 487 (C. C. A. 10; 1934),cert. den. 294 U. S. 724 (1935).

UNITED STATES v. MATHEWSON, 32 F. :2d 745 (Cl. C. A.8, 1929).

UNITED STATES v. MATLOCK, 26 Fed. Cas. No. 15744 (D. C.Ore. 1872).

UNITED STATES v. MID CONTINENT PETROLEUM CORP.,67 F. 2d 37 (Cl. C. A. 10, 1933), cert. den. 200 U. S. 702(1933).

UNITED STATES v. MILLE LAG BAND OF CHIPPEWAINDIANS. 229 U. S. 498 (1913).

UNITED STATES v. MILLER, 105 Fed. 944 (D. C. Nev. 1901).UNITED STATES v:-MINNESOTA, 270 U. S, 181 (1026). s. c

271 U. S. 648.ITNITED STATES v. MINNESOTA. 95 F. 2d 468 (C. Cl. A. 8.

1938), aff’d sub nom. MINNESO’IA v. UNITED STATES, 30;U. S. 382 (1939).

UNITED STATES v. MISSOURI-KANSAS-TEXAS R. CO., 66F. 2d 919 (C. C. A. 10, 1933).

UNITED STATES v. MITCHELL, 109 U. S. 146 (1883).IJNITED STATES v. MONTE, 3 N. M. 173, 3 Pac. 45 (1884).UNITED STATES v. MOORE, 161 Fed. 513 (C. C. & 9, 1968),

s. c. 154 Fed. 712IJNITED STATES v. MOORIS, 2fil Fed. 86 (C. C. A. 8, 1922),

rcv’g 261 Fed. 523 (1~. C. 1% L). Okia. 1919).I2VI’l’ED STATES v. MORRISON. 203 Fed. 364 (C. Ci Colo.

1901).UNITEI) STATES v. MOTT. 37 F’. 860 (C. C. A. 10. 1930).

rev’g 33 Ii’. 2d 340 (D. C. ?i. I). Okla. 1929). aff’d sub nom.hIOTT v. UNITED STATES. 283 U. S. 747 (1931).

I:NITF:D STATES v. MIJLi~I~NDORR, 74 F. 2d 286 (C. C. A.10. 1934), s. c. 69 F. 2d 1013.

UNITED STATES v. MULLIN. 71 Fed. 682 (D. C. Neb. 1895).UNITED STATES v. MUMMERT, 15 F. 2d 926 (C. C. A. 8,

1926).

.

: .TAj3LE .OF F$DE’RAL CASES

UNITED. STATES v.::MYERS! 206 Fed. 387 :{(a+; .A. h8, :1913).UNITED STATES iv?~AVARRE, %73sU.+S;: 77.:(1899):,:* ;. ::,:j

UNITED: STATES :v.i-NELSON.-T29.;F~d. :tL&!~(@.“?.C,.:. Alaska-“’ %86), . affd ’ su~;:hoin;-‘,UECSON~~v.r UNITE&STATES, ‘309:* Fed. 112 (C. 0. Ore. 1887): :. : -.: : : *;.; &‘y..<

UNITED STATES v: NEW.‘YORK’ INDIANS;“l73..U. S. 1-464(18991, s. c. 170 u. s. 1, 170 u. s. 614. ‘i.

.TJNITED STATES sv. NEZ .;??BRCE. COUNTY.:‘,95 .F.. 2d 232j. : .‘:‘(Q. C. ‘A.‘ 9, 1938). :mod’g-$16. F;:‘Sqpp~:2(S7.;!(D..~.C. .Idaho

1936), rehearing den.ig5.F. 2d-~.(.C:tC%z9,1938)::UNITED STATES -v:ri NE% :PE:REE:.COUN~,‘.IDBBO;“ 267.

Fed. 495 (D. C. D. Idaho 1916. 19i7). ‘. ‘. : -‘:‘”UNITED:STATES +.,:NIClE, 2if Tj; S:-‘591 (19X$jZ.‘:Z .UNITED STATES ~.INICHOIiSXHISHOLM <&UMBER CO:, 183

Fed. 383 (C. C. A$inn. 1911). See UNITED STATES v.P A R K LAND’CO..;988 J%& 383‘.(C C. .Mitiii. 1 9 1 1 ) :

UNITED STATES %%:NORLE;i237 ;U.. ‘S. ‘!74;:1(1915), rev’g 197Fed. 292 (C. C. A. 8. 1912). s. c. 181 Fed. 847.::..~ -1

UNIT) STATES v. ODENEAL, 10 Fed, 616 (C. C. Ore.

UNITE;):STATES v. O’GORMAN, 287 Fed. ‘135 j (C. C. A. 8,

UNITISD STATES v. OKLAHOMA; 261 U. S. 2?# (1923), s. c.262 11: s. 734. .

UNITED STATES v. -OLD SETTLERS, 148 U: S. 427 (1893).See OLD SETTLERS v. UvIT~!D STATES, 148 U. S. 427-(1893). ..

UNITED STATE? v.;OvAHi TRIFEJ OF HN?IANS, 253 U. S.27.5 (1920).

UNITED STATES v. OYE A~O~qBILE, 237. Fed. 891 (D. C.Mont. 1916). .,_. :

UNITED STATES v. ONE BUICF BUTQMOBILE, 2!5 Fed. 793: (,,.-‘a. Co!o.’ lglg).,- ‘I .;I ,’ ., : .‘I .i.,,

UNITED STATES v. ONE BUTCK ROADSTER AUTONOBILE,224 Fed. 961 (D.‘C?FlllD. Okla.‘1917). -. ‘.

UNITED STATES.v: .ONE CArjrLLAC EIGHT AUTOMOBILE,255 Fed. 173 (D. C. M. D. Twn. 1918).

UNITED STAT& .v..: ONE CHEVROLi!!T COUPE AUTONO-BILE, 58 F. 2d 235 iC. C. A. 9, 1932) _

UNITED STATES v. ONE CHEVItOLET FOUR-DOOR SEDANADTOi\fOBILE, 41 F. 2d 782 (D. C. N. D. Okla. 1930).

UNITED STATES v. ONE J?ORD FIVE PASSENGER ATJTO-MOBILE. 259 Fed. 645 (D. C. E.‘D. Ok&1919).

UNITED STATES v. 196 BUFFALO ROBES, 1 Mont. 459(1872).

UNITED STATES +. ONE SEVEN-PASSENGER PAIGE CAR,250 Fed. 641 (D. C. E. D. Okla. 1919).

UNITED STATES v. OREGON CENTRAL MILITARY ROADCO., 103 Fed. .549 (C. C. Ore. 1900). rev’d sub nom. ‘JNI?EDSTATES v. CALIF: & ORE. LD. CO;, 192 U. S. 355 (1903).

UNITED STATES. v. OSAGE COUNTY, 251 U. S. 128 (1919).rev’g 254 Fed. 570 (C. C. A. 8, 1918). s. c. 1 F. 2d 761, 244U. S. 663. 267 U. S. 587.

UNITED STATES v. OSBORN, 2 Fed:.58 (D. C. Ore. 1880).UNITED STATES v. PAINE LUMRER CO., 206 U. S. 467

(lEO7). afX’g 154 Fed. 2&y (C:CE..D. Wis. 1904).UNITED STATES v. P+RK ‘LAN? CO., 188 Fed: 383 (CL C.

Minn. 1911). I.UNITED STATES v. PARKHURST-DAVIS CO., 176 U. S. 317

(1900).UNITED STATES -v. PARKINS, 18 F. 2d 642 (D. C. Wyo.

19’26).UNIT,“,,9 .STATES v. PARKINS, 18 F. 2d 643 (D. C. Wyo.

UNI~8E~j ,ZjTATE’S v. PARTELLO, 48 Fed. 670 (C. C. Mont.

UNITED STATES v. PATRICK, 73 Fed. 800 (C. C. A. 8,X396 1.

UNITED STATES v. PATTERSON. 91 Fed. 854 (C. C. S. D.Iown 1899).

UNIT8’Fj.STATES v. PAYNE, 8 Fed. 883 (D. C. W. D. Ark.

UNITED STATES V. PAYNE. 22 Fed. 426 (D. C. Knn. 1884).UNITI<:D SI’ATES v. PAYNE, 27 Fed. Gas. No. 16014 (C. C.

Kan. lSi7 1.UNITED STATES v. PAYNE, 264 U. S. 446 (1924), aff+g 284

Fed. 827 (C. C. A. 9, 1922).

UNITqE;, STATES v. PEARSON, 231 IFed. 270 (D. 19.” S., ,D.. I ^ ! :‘,:,

UNITED STATES v. PELICAN, ,232:‘U.B:.44? (1914)i.‘) -:: ’ ‘:UNITED STATES v. PHILLIP$ 56l.F. 2d 447’,jD. ‘C., NC!.

‘1931)UNITED STATES v. PICO, 5 Wail. 536’(1866). -i- ‘.UNITED STATES v. PIERSON, 145, ‘E’ed. ‘814, (C. C. A. 8,

1906). .;,UNITED STATES v. PINE RIVER. LOGGING L: IMPROVE-

MENT CO., 89 Fed. 907 (C. C. A! .~8,: 1898);“1. ;C: 186 XJ. ‘.S.Zj’gs 38 Fed. 319. ‘: . -: . . 1 J :!_ : ; i::.‘.:- : ,‘. : ‘, :

UNITED STATES V. PORTER, 22’~: 2d%5~~(c:~c. .A-9.:1927)UNIX-ED STATES V. PoRTNEUF-MARSH, VAIZRY. i-&R. co.:

213 Fed. 601 (C. C. A. 9, 1914),‘aff’g ,205 Fed. :416 ,:(D; C.Idaho 1913). : . . :.-.i. ,I? ::.:‘.‘:. I:;’ ‘,; !

UNITED STATES, v. POWERS; 305 :U. S. 527’:(1939’), &f’g94 F. 2d 783 (C. C. A. 9! 1?38), mod’g 16. F. :Sti@p. 155 (0: ClMont. 1936 1..

UNITED STATES v. PRIDGEtiti, 153;;: S..4; (&4,.:. .’UNITED STATES v. PROyOE, 283 U. S:‘i53 (1931). rev’g

38 F. 2d 799 (C. C. A. 9, 1930), s. c. 282 TJ. S. 818.UNITED STATES v. PUMPHREY, 11 App. D.“C. 44 (1897). ’UNITED STATES v. QUIVER, 241 U. S. 602 (1916).UNITED STATES v. RAGSDALE, 27 Fed. Cas. No. 16113 (C. C.

Ark. 1847).UNITED STATES v. RAICHE, 31 F. 2d 624 (D. C. W. D.

Wis. 1928).UNITED STATES v. RALEY, 173 Fed.. 159 (D. C. Ore. .1909).UNITED STATES v. RAMSEY, 271 U. S. 467 (1926).UNITED STATES v. RANSOM, 263 U. S. 691 (1924), aff’g

per cur. 2S4 Fed. 108 (C. C. A. 8, 1922), ,arg 271 Fed. 747(D. C. E. D. Okla. 1921).

UNITED STATES v. REA-READ &III& 8 ELEVATOR CO., 171Fed. 501 (C. C. E.-D. Okla. 1909): ’ .:

UNITED STATES v. REESE, 27 Fed. Cas. No..;6137 (D. C.Mass. lS68 1.

UNITED STATES v. REILY. 290 U. S. 33 (1933); rev’g 62F. 2d 621 (C. C. A. 10, 1932).

UNITED STATES v. REYNOLDS, 250 U. S. 104 (1919), req’g252 Fed. 65 IC. C. A. 8. 1918).

UNITED STAT& v. RIdHARiX$ 27 F. 2d 284. (C. C. A. 8,1928), r&g sub nom. RICHARDS v. UNITED STATES, 21F. 2d 94 (D. C. N. D. Okla. 1927). cert. den. 278 U. S.fxn---.

UNITED STATES v. RICKERT, 188 U. S:432 (1903).UNITED STATES v. RITCHIE, 17 How. 525 (1854).UNITED STATES v. ROBERTS, 10 .Fed. 540 (C. C. S. D. Ohio

1882 ) .UNITED STATES v. ROGERS, 4 Ho&. 567 (1846).UNITED STATES v. ROGERS, 23 Fed. 658 (D. C. W. D. Ark

lS85 ) .UNITED STATES v. ROLFSON. 38 F. 2d 806 (C. C. A. 9, 1930),

rev’d sub nom. ROLFSON v. UNITED STATES, 28.3 U. S. 753(1931). s. c. 252 U. S. 818.

UNITED STATES v. ROMAINE, 255 Fed. 253 (C. C. A. 9,1919).

UNITED STATES v. ROSE, 20 F. Supp. 350 (D. C. W. D.N. C. lfl37r- .

UNITED STATES v. ROWELL. 243 U. S: 464 (1917).UNITED STATES v. RUNDELL, 181 Fed. 887 (C. C. E. D.

Okln. 19103, aff’d sub nom. BOWLING ET AL. v. UNITEDSTATES, 191 Fed. 19 (C. C. A. 8. 1911). s. c. 233 U. S. 528.

UNITED STA’I‘ES v. SA-COO-DA-COT, 27 Fed. Cas. No. 16212(C. C. Neb. 1870).

UNI1’ED STATES v. SANDOVAL, 231 U. S. 28 (1913). rev’g198 Fed. 539 (D. C. N. M. 1912).

UNITED STATES v. SANDERS, 27 Fed. Cas. No. 16220 (C. C.

UNITED STATES v. SANDS, 94 F. 2d 156 (C. C. A. 10, 1938).UNITED S’L’.\‘LI:S v. SANDSTROM, 22 F. Supp. 190 (D. C.

Ark. 1847).

N. D. Okla. 1935).rJNI’lX~ STA’CES v: SANTISTEVAN, 1 N. M. 583 (1874).UNITED STA’I’ES v. SAUNDERS, 96 Fed. 268 (C. C. Wash.

lS99 ).IJN‘ITED STATES v. SEMJNOLE NATION, 299 U. S. 417 (1937).USITED STATICS v. SENECA NATION OF NEW YORK IN-

DIANS, 274 Fed. 946 (D. C. W. D. N: Y. 1921).USI’I’ED STATES v. SEUFERT BROS. CO., 252 Fed. 51 (C. C. A.

9, 191s. wit of error dism. 251 U. S. 566 (1920).UNIIXD STATES v. SEVELOFF, 27 Fed. Cas. No. 16252 (D. C.

Ore. 1872).

*’;:., /. <

-

.

TAB- .OF,.&DtiRAL CASES

UNITED;ST&TOre. 1873). .: ‘: ~

.~.. . :. : ‘...‘i,“.,.

CANTILE : CO.; 68UNITED STATES v. SHERBuRNE MERF. 2d 155 (C. C. A. 9. 1933).

UNITED STATES v. SHOCK, 1::y:. 1911). I.+, : ‘,

;7 Fed: ,862. (CC. E. P.,&la:‘: .,.>j ‘5 i,;.i.:;,“!

UNITED STATES v. SHOCK, 187 Fed. 8700.. (C:,G.; E. .D;..Okla...l ,191l) ,_,_ i i’i :-.. &’ :y ;. ;; .-.- ,-; :- .,.:,‘.:i:i’,;~! ; ‘:; .i:.:,;‘$, .$UNITED STATES v, SHOSHONE~TRIBE, 304lJ~S::~11.(-19~),. ..-.2 aff g 85 C. -Cl% 331,.(1937) ,‘s? ci SHOSHONE -iTRIBE.- v:;,:UNITED ,STATES, 299 U:S.:476 (1937) . :i .‘, ‘: ; 7. ; ;

UNITED STATES v. SINNO.TT, 26;Fed. 84: (Cl.: C. Ore. .1886).UNITED STATES v. ,SINNO’M’; 26 Fed. -89 :-CC:. C. Ore: 188tj),. ~._~. _. .UNITED STATES v. .SISSETON, &ND -W&II :PETON .:BANDS

:> OF SIOUX INDIANS, 208 U.. S<561’,( 1908). <j-f., ,. ; !,;.i:,.,,’UNITED STATES v. SITARANGOK, 4’Alaska 667 (2 Div:l913).UNITED STATE.S v. SMITH; 35 ’ Fed. 490 (C. ;C. : E: D.. MO:

lS88). : ‘z:i.UNITED STATES V. SMITH, ,266 Fed. 740 :(D:C. E. D: OMa.

UNI?l)l%TATES v SMITH 288 Fed. .356 (C. ‘C .A 8”192’3)rev’g 279 Fed. 136 (D. C.‘E. 0: Okla. 1922), i. c.’ UNITEDSTATES v. LAW, 250 Fed. 218, (C. C..A. 8, 1918). .

UNITED STATES v. SNOHOMISH RIVER ,BOON CO., 246Fed. 112 (C. C. A. 9,1917), s. c.-234 Fed. 9%:

UNITED8TATES v. SOLDANA, 246 U. S. 530. (i918)..UNITED STATES v. SOULE, 30 Fed. 918 (C. C. Kan. 1887),

rev’g UNITED STATES v. ROGERS, 23iFed. 658 (D. C.Ark. 1885). I

UNITED STATES v. SOUTHERN SURETY CO., 9 P.’ 2d 664(D. C. E. D. Okla. 1925).

UNITED STATES v. SPAETH, 24. F. Supp. 465 (D. C. Minn.IHWI. ”

UNITED STATES v. STAHL, 27 Fed. Cas. No. i6373 .(ti.’ C..\-. -.

Kan. 1868). ’ < ‘.

UNITED STATES v. STARR, 27 Fed: Cas. .No, 16379 (C. C.Ark. 1846). ‘.- I 2 .,

UNITED STATES v. STEARNS LUMBER co..’ 245 u. S: 436(1918).

UNITED STATES v. STEPHENS, 12 Fed. 52 (D. C. Ore. 1882).UNITED STATES v. STEVENS, 31 F. 2d 520 (Cl. C. A. 7, 1929).UNITED STATES v. STIGALL. 226 Fed. 190 (C. C. A. 8. 1915).UNITi& STATES v. STOCKING, 87 Fed. 857 (D. C: Mont.

UNITED STATES v. STOFELLO, 8 Ariz 461, 76Pae. 611(1904).

UNITED STATES v. STONE, 2 Wall. 525 -( 1864).

1930).UNITED STATES v. STO’M!S. 49 F. 2d 619 (D. C. W.‘D. Wash.

UNITED STATES v. STOWE; &Fed: 807 (D. C. Minn. 1884).UNITED STATES v. STUCKEY;,271 Fed. 747. (D. C2.E. D.

Okla. 1921). See UNITED STATES v. BOARD OF COM-MISSIONERS OF MCINTOSH COUNTY. 271 Fed. 747 (D. C.E. D. Okla. 1921).

UNITED STATES v..STURGEON, 27 Fed. Cas. No. 16413 (D. C.Nev. 1879 ) . \

UNITED STATES v. SUTTON~.2i5 U. S. 291 (1909), rev’s 165Fed. 253 (D. C. E. D. Wash1908).

UNITED STATES v. SWAIN COUNTY, N. C., 46 F. 2d 99(D. C. W. D. N. C.‘1930), rev’d-sub nom. UNI’fED STATESv. WRIGHT, et al.. 53 F. 2d 300 (Cl. C. A., 8. 1931). cert.den. 255 U. S. 539. .’

UNITED STATES v. THE CORA, 1 Dak. 1, 46 N. W. 503 (lS67).UNITED STATES v. THE JAMES G.:SWAN, 50 Fed. 108 (D. C.

Wash. 1892). See SWAN, THE JAMES G., 50 Fed 108(D. C. \Vnsh. 1892).

UNITED S’J’ATES v. TADISH, 211 Fed. 490 (D. C. Ariz. 1913).UNITED STATES v. TA-WAN-GA-CA, 28 Fed. Cas. No. 16435

(D. ‘2. Ark. 1836).UNITED STATES v. TAYLOR, 3 Wash. Ter. 88, 13 @ac. 333

(1857l.UNITED STATES v. TERRELL, 28 Fed. Cas. No. 16452 (C. C.

Ark. 1840 1.UNITED ST.A’CES v. TERRELL, 28 Fed. Cas. No, 16453 (C. C.

Ark. Ml0 1.UNITED STATES v. THOMAS, 47 Fed. 488 (C. C. W. D. Wis.

1891). questions answered 151 U. S. 577 (1894).UNITED STATES v. THURSTON COUNTY, 143 Fed. 287

(C!. C. A. 8, 1906), rev’g 140 Fed. 456 (C. C. Neb. 1905).

I. 1 :‘__ :.j,

625 “

UNITED STATES v. TIGER, 19 F. 2d 35,. (Cl. C.. A. 8, 1927.),‘: ;;:aff’g .TIGER v. SLINKER, 4‘1925). F’.- 2d 714 (D. .CI.E.;D;\ OkIa.* . ,.,

UNITED?STATES v. TITLE INS: CO;, 265 <II. *-fl.,&! .’ (1924):aff’g 258 Fed. E21 (C. C. A. 9. 1923): *

UNITED STATES v. TOM, 1 Ore. 26 (1853). : :UNITED STATES v. TOItEtEY CEDAR CO.. 154 Fed:‘20? In k’-__, -.- - --. ~~-- -. -.. . . .E. D. Wis. 1904). See UNITED STATES.v. PAINE LUM,?.’ BERCO., 206 U.S. 476 (1907). . .

UNITED STATES v. TWELVE. BOTTLES. .0&W&&Y,s ” 201 Fed. 19l.(D..eC. Mont. 1912). ; : !’ I 62, : : -; f

UNITED STATES v. TWENTY NINE ~GAIi&SiOF W&R.‘: : KEY, 45 Fed. 847. (D. C. Mont. 1891) ;- _, ..- ,. i, .: -. ,

UNITED STATES v. TWO GALLONS OF WI&&Y $1;.~...:.‘Fed, 986 (D. C. Mont. 1914). :.. pi . .’ :‘:_‘L’..., :, ‘. _,UNITED STATES v. U. S. FIDELITY CO.. 309. :IJ. S: 506

(1940):rev’i:106F.2d804(C.C.A..l0.1939):..: .:.UNITED STATES v. VAN WERT, 233U:,‘S. 223 .(1914), See

UNITED STATES v. Bl.RDSALL; 233 II.. S. 223 (1914) _UNITED STATES v: VARELA. See uNITED. STATES v..,J‘OSEPH. ,.: ,f

UNI’I CED STATES v. WALKER RIVER IRRIGATION DIS-TRICT, 104 F. 2d 334 (C. C. A. 9,158. 14 F. Sunn. 10.

1939), rev’g, 11 F. Supp.

UNITED STATES v. WALKOWSKY, 38 Fed. 2d 805 (C.. C. A:9.1930)) rev’d sub nom. WALKOWSKY v. UNITED STATES,283 U. S. 753 (1931), s. c. 282 U. S. 818.

UNITED STATES v. WALLER, 243 U. S. 452 (1917).UNITED STATES v. WALTERS, 17 F. .2d 116 (D. Cl. .Minn.

1926). *UNITED STATES v. WARD, 28 Fed. Gas. No. .16639 (C. C.

Kan. 1863).UNITED STATES v. WARD; 42 Fed. 320 ‘(C. C. S. D. Cal. 1890).UNITED STATES v. WARWICK, 51 Fed. 280 (D: C. .Alaska

1892).UNITED STATES v. WATASHE, 102 F. 2d 428 (C. C. A. 10,

1939), aff’g 21 F. Supp. 903 (D. C. W. D. Okla. 1935).UNITED STATES v. WESTERN INV. CO., 226 Fed. 726 (Cl. C. A.

8, 1915). ‘.UNITED STATES v. WHALEY, 37 Fed: 145 (C. Cl. S. D. Cal.

1883).UNI;gTF”, STATES v. WHITMIRE, 236 Fed. 474 (C. C. A. 8,

UNIT9Ei):STATES v. WIGHTNAN, 230 Fed. 277 (D. C. Ariz.

UNITED STATES v. WILDCAT, 244 U. S. 111 (1917).UNITED STATES v. WILLIAMS, .2 Fed. 61 (C. C. Ore. 1880).UNITED STATES v. WINANS, 198 U. S. 371 (1905), rev’g

73 Fed. 72 (C. C. Wash. 1896).

UNITED S.TATES v. WIRT, 28 Fed. Cas. No. 16745 (D. C.

UNITED STA-CES v. WINSLOW; 28 Fed. Cas. No. .16742 .(D. C.

Ore. 1874) .UNITED STATES v. WOODS, 223 Fed: 316, (C. C. A. 8,1915)

Ore. 1875 f .

UNITED STATES v. WOOTEN, 40 F. 2d 882 (C. C.’ A. 10:1930 ) .

UNITED STATES v. WRIGHT, 197 Fed. 297 (C. C. A. 8, 1912).UNITED STATES v. WRIGHT, 229 U. S. 226 (1913).UNITED,STA’IES v. WRIGHT, 53 F. 2d 300 (C. C. A. 4. 1931).

rev‘g UNI’I’ED STATES v. SWAIN COUNTY, 46 F. 2d 99(D. C. W. D. N. c’. 1930), cert. den. 285 U. S. 539.

(JNITED STATES v. WURTZBURGER, 276 Fed. 753 (D. C. Ore.1921).

UNITED STATES v. YAKIM-4 COUNTY, 274 Fed. 115 (D. C.E. I). Wash. 1921).

UNITED STATES v. YELLOW SUN, 28. Fed. Cas. No. 16780(D. C. Neb. 1870). See UNITED STATES v. SA-COO-DA-COT, 27 Fed Gas. No. 16212 (Cl. C. Neb. 1870).

UNITED ST<\TT:S v. YOUNG, 44 Fed. 168 (C. C. E. D. N. Y.1890 )

UNITED S’f’=\‘II:S v. ZUMWALT, 186 Fed. 596 (D. C. Idaho191U).

UNITED STATES er rel. BESAW v. WORK, 6 F. 2d 694 (App.D. (‘. 139Fi)., I

UNITED S-I‘ATES ex r+$ BROWN v. LANE, 232 U. S. 598(1914,.

uNITEI~ s 1’A’rES ex tel. CHARLEY v. BAKERS BAY FISHCO., 2 F. Supp. 426 (D. C. W. D. Wash. 1931). See UNITEDSTATES es rel. CHARLEY v. MCGOWAN, 62 F. 2d 955(C. C. A. 9, 1933). .

UNITED STATES ‘ex: :rel. LOWE v.’ FISHER, 223 U. ’ S. 95(1912). See LOWE v. FISHER, 223 U. S.‘95 (1912):

UNIT@D STATES ex rel. LYNN. v.. HAMILTON, 233 Fed. 685;“-;‘z(D;-C. We D.‘N. ym 1915). -.

UNITED STATES ex rel. McALESTER FgWARDs &AL CO.v. FALL.. 27i..Fed.--573 (App: D. C. 1922); &ff’ii sub nom.

.;:.;‘WORK ir. UNITED STATES ex rel. .MoAI,&STER EI>-WARDS CO.. 262 U. S. 200 (1923). s. e. 43 Sup. Ct. 433.

UNITED’-STATE% ex. eel. McIN?OSfi. v. CRA%$ORD; 47 Fed.561 (C, C. W. D. Ark 1891). --‘.-.: _. ),

UNITED.STATESek rel. .I+Y v. HEBFR. 21 F. 2g.?O9 (D. C.?:.ir Idabo’,l928): .: :

UNITED STATES ex r,eL RE%OI+S v. LAN?!.45 Atip: D: C..!!z 50 11916). .: :,;.7 ,.. :I :UNITED -STiTES ex ?&. SCQ’IT v. -BURDOCK, :1 Drfk; .,1:4?$ 46

-c N..w;‘g* (1875). . ? : ~I )! .-..UNITED STATES ex rel. SEARCH v. CHOCTAW. C. & 4. R ‘iy.i.. CO.,..Ok~.‘4&‘41 P&729-:(1f$g5).;: -.. -i .:UNITED :STATES 6x rel. STAtiItiG BEAR, v. CROOK 25

Fed: Cas. No. 14891 (C. C..Neb; 1879). i- - -- - - - --

,_. -. _.-_. -__-,_UNImD STATES ex rel. SYKES v. LANE, 268 Fed. 520 (App.

D. C. 1919), app. dism. 254 U. S. 618, s. c. 40 Sup. Ct. 484.UNITED STATES ex rel. WARREN v. TCKES, n. F. 2d 844

(App.D.C.19341,s.c.lS.C.D.C.(N.S.)’1.--- -.. -. .

UNITED STATES ex rel. WEST v. HI’&HCOCl?, 205 U. S 80( 1 9 0 7 ) .

S.r .-

UEr’L&%~ &ATES ex rel. YOUNG V. IMODA, 4 Mont. 38,l Pac.-721 (1881).

UNITED STATES ex rel. FANE v. ZANE. 1 Iqd T. 185, 69e S:W. 842 (1902).

UNITED ?TATES EXPRESS CO. v. FRIE;)MdN, &i Fed: 673..,,.‘;;op’A. 8,’ 19111, rev’g 180 Fed. TOO6 (D. 9. ,W.,.?. ark

‘,UNITED ‘STATES FIbELITY 8 GUARANTY CO. V. %IIR@, i

Ind. T. 83, -103 S. W. 773 (1997), s. c. 20 Okla. y6,’ 95 P&c?18 (1908). I

UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY Cd. OF BALTIMORE. I$D.. v. UNITED STATES, 214 U. S. 507 (1909)aff’g 156 Fed. 550 (C. C. A. 9. 1967).

UNKLE v. WILLS, 281 Fed. 29 (C. C. A% 8; 1922).UTAH AND NORTHERN RAILWAY, v. FISHER, 116 U. S. 28

(18851. aBg 3 Pac. 3 ,(1884).UTE INDIANS v. UNITED STATES, 45 C. Cls. 440 (1910)

s. c. 46 C. Cls. 225.UTE INDIANS v. UNITED STATES, 46 C. Cls. 225 (1911).UTILITIES PRODUCTION CORP. v. CARTER OIL CO., 2 F

Supp. 81 (D. C. N. D. Okla. 1933). $t?d 72 F. 2d 655 (C. C. A10. 1934). s. c. 100 F. 2d 1006.

VATXNCIA v. UNITED STATES, 31 C. Cls. 355 (1896).Vhl,K v. UNITED STATES, 27 C. Cls. 241 (1893).VALK v. UNITED STATES, 168 U. S. 703 (1897), affg 33 C

Cls. 501 (1897). 29 C. Cls. 62 ( 1894).VALLEJOS. ADM’R v. UNITED STATES: 35 9. Cls. 489 (1900)VERNON v. AhIOS, 255 U. S. 373 (1921). See WINTON v

AMOS. 255 U. S. 373 (1921 b. 0VEZINA v. IJNITED STkCES.‘245 Fed. 411 (C. C. A. 8, 1917)VINCENT v. U?JITED STATES. 39 C. Cls. 456 (1904).VINSON v. GRAHAM, 44’ F. 2d 772 (C. C. A. 10, 1930). cert

den. 283 U. S. 819. !7’OVES v:. UNITED STATES, 249 Fed. 191 (C. C. A. 7,1918).

RAS&ItiGTON v. MILLER, 235 U. S. 422 (1914). : ’VASSOM v. WILLISTON, 3 Ind. T. 365. 58 s: W.. 574 (i@O).VATERS v. CAMPBELL, 29 Fed. Cas. No. 17264 .(C.’ .C.‘,‘Or.&,.

1876). s. c. 29 Fed. Cas. No. 17265 (a 6. Ore.,J8’77)-’ i: _RATKINS .v. UNITED ,STATES, 3 Ind. T. 281;. 54. S. W.’ 819;

‘\ (:19@0), s. c. 41.S. w. 1044.WATSON v. UNITED STATES, 263 Fed. 700 (C .C- & 8,‘1920).,WAU-PE-MAN-QUA v. ALDRICH. 28 Fed 489 (C. C..Ind. 1886).,-- --_NEBSTER v. FALL, 266 U. S. 507 (1925):/VEBSTER v: REID. 11 How: 437 (185d).

! :‘..

: -

WEEKS v. UNIT@> STATES, 2 @d. T. 162, $8.$: -W1 ‘1036,.~lfst~~ ._ ’\----,.

VELCH v. FIRST TRUST AND SaVINaS BANK, 15: p: 2ci 184,’ (C. C:A. 8 . 1 9 2 6 ) . i:‘. :.i

mrhi, A@f’R v. UNITED STATES. 32 c. ciS.:io& (im).&‘EI;LSVILLE OIL CC, v. MILLER, 243 U. S.% (1917j.:.tVELTY v. REED, 231 Fed. 930 (C. C. A. 8, 1916); -afl=‘g on

rehearing REED v. WELTY, 197 Fed. 419 (D. C. E. D. Okra.1912) and rev’g 219 Fed. 864 (C!. C. A. 8. 1915).

CVELTY v. UNITED STATES. 14 Okla. 7, 76 Pac. 21 (1904).rV@STERN CHEROKEES v; UNITED STATES, 27 C. Cls. 1

(1891), mod. 148 U. S. 427.rVE.STmN CHEROKEES v.‘ UNITED STATES, 82 0. Cls., ‘&6’r.nnn\ :

(LVSJ,.

WESTLING v. UNITGlapp. dism. 288

mSTMORLANDn

D STATES, 60 F. 2d 398 (C. C. 4.8,1932),,R Fiiln-. -. --“.

v. UNITED STATES, 135 U. S. 545 (1895).WESTON v. UNITED STATES, 29 C. Cts. 420 (l&94).WBEELER v. PETITE, 153 Fed. 471 (C. C. Ore. 1907). ’WHITCHURCH v. CRAWFORD, 92 F. 2d 249 (C. C., A. 1$1937)

affg’ WHITCHURCH v. BURGE, 17 F. Supp. 234 (D. C..- Okla. 1936).

WHITE v. BROWN, 1 Ind. T. 98, 38 S. W. 335 (1896).WHITEBERD v. EAGLE-PICHER LEAD CO., 40 -F. 2d 479

(C. C. A. 10. 1930), aff’g 28 F. 2d 209 (D. C. N. D. Okla.’1928). cert. den. 282 U. S. 844.

WHITE RIV,R UTES v. UNITED STATES, 43 C. Cls. 260(1908).

WHITNEY v. DICK, 202 U. S. 132 (1906). rev’g in part Exparte DICK. 141 Fed. 5 (C. C. A. 9. 1905).

WICHITA AND AFFILIATED BANDS v. CHtiCTAW NATION,179 U. S. 494 (1900). See UNITED STATES V. CHOCTAWetc. NATIONS. 179 U. S. 494 (1990).

WIGGAN v. CONOLLY, 163 U. S. 56 (1896) _WILBUR v. UNtTED STATES ex rel. KADRIE, 281 U. S. 206

(1930). See UNITED STATES ex rel. KADRIE v. WEST,30 P ‘d 9S9 ( App. D. C. 1929) _

WrLCO.&N v. HYBARGER. 1 Ind. T. 138. 38WILDER v. IJNITED STATES, 16 C. Cls. 528WILHITE v. SKELTON, 143 Fed. 67 (C. C.

5 Ind. T. 621. S2 S. W. 392 (19001).WILLlAMS v. CITY OF CHICAGO. 242 U. S.WII.LfAhIS v. CLINTON. 83 F. 24 143 (C. C.

s. w. 669 (1897).(1880).A. 8, 1906). fev’g

434 (1917).A. 10, 1936). S. C.

. ~~11 F. supp. 456.WILLIAMS v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK. 216 U. S. 582 (1919).WILLIAMS v. JOHNSON, 239 U. S. 414 (1915).WILLIAMS v. STEINMETZ. 16 Okla. 104, 82 Pac. 986 (1905).

wI$.&ItiS .v. UNIfJ!ED STATES, 4 Ind. T. 24X.69 S. W. 84Q1, (lQ@).l.-; ,Y’ ,_ ..,~~,;:.: .I I

‘t+.ILIZAbfS :+;: .S@IITE,‘218 Fed. 797 (C. C: A. 8, 1914).WILLIiV& V.-WORKS, 4 hi. T. 587, 76 S. W. 246 (lQ63).WILLISz’v. UNIW .STATES, 6 Ind. T. 424, Q8 S. W. 147

..’ (lQQ6):

[COCK, 2Ql .U. S:2Q‘Z(l+J6~. _: ’ :’745 U: S. 427 (1918).D STATES, 170 Fed. 3oi ‘(@- C. A. 8,

,WOOlsS~y~.~D STATJ%, 223 Fed. 316 (C. C. A.‘8, 1915).

’ 8yirD STATES. v. WOODS, 223 Fed. 316 (C. C. ‘A.

-~OOjsIWAI$v: DE ‘GRAFFENRIED. 238 U. S. 284 (1915):’ WOOLVERTON, ADM’R v. UNITED STATES, 29 c. Ckj. lti

WOlk%%!kR v Gl’&RGIA 6. Pet 515 (1832 jWOfc?r <: ~tJbhh$T? 2s F. 2d 393 ‘iC. C.’ A. 8, i92S).

f

.

:

6 3 3 0 5 8 4 5 4 2

WORK v. UNITED STATES ex rel. GOUIN, 18 F. 2d 826(App.:I?.C. lQ27).

WORK v. UNITED STATES ex rel. LYNN, 266 U. S. 161 (1924),rev’g 285 Fed. 88Q ( App: D. C. 1922).

WORK. v. UNITED STATES ex rel. bXOSIER, 261 U. S. 352(1923) ,.rev*g PAYNE v- UNITED STATES ex rel. MOSIER,

.$~~I‘~f&@;~~87~ tAap. .D. C.:192p).%v~R~%I&‘IZMBER bmLs .v. arax~ mm~u G. MIN.

1910).Y-TA-TA~~V~. V. REBOCK, 165 Fed. 257 (c. c. N. D. Iowa

1QOO).ZEVE$YF&XV&MER; 5 Ind: .T. 646 ; 82 S. W. 941 (1904) , aff d

2X& P.UEBLO & v. UNITED STATES, 168 U. S. 198:cl8&ZUFALL ‘v. @ITED STATES, 1 Ind. T. 638, 43 S. W. 7&

(1898).

..(