+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Raiffeisenbank · NIM 5.3% 5.9%-0.7 ppt. Sochi Belgorod Volgograd Yekaterinburg Kaliningrad Kaluga...

Raiffeisenbank · NIM 5.3% 5.9%-0.7 ppt. Sochi Belgorod Volgograd Yekaterinburg Kaliningrad Kaluga...

Date post: 20-Apr-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 7 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
21
Raiffeisenbank 9 months 2019 results
Transcript
Page 1: Raiffeisenbank · NIM 5.3% 5.9%-0.7 ppt. Sochi Belgorod Volgograd Yekaterinburg Kaliningrad Kaluga Krasnodar Bryansk Lipetsk Moscow Anapa Omsk Orel Perm Petrozavodsk Pyatigorsk Rostov-on-Don

Raiffeisenbank

9 months 2019 results

Page 2: Raiffeisenbank · NIM 5.3% 5.9%-0.7 ppt. Sochi Belgorod Volgograd Yekaterinburg Kaliningrad Kaluga Krasnodar Bryansk Lipetsk Moscow Anapa Omsk Orel Perm Petrozavodsk Pyatigorsk Rostov-on-Don

The information contained in this confidential document (the "Presentation") has been prepared by AO Raiffeisenbank (the "Bank"). It has not been fully

verified and is subject to material updating, revision and further amendment. Any opinions, forecasts and estimates expressed are current as of the date

appearing on the Presentation only and all are subject to change without notice, and neither the Bank nor any of its shareholders, directors, officers, agents,

employees or advisers is under any obligation to update or keep current the information contained in this Presentation.

While the information contained herein has been prepared in good faith, neither the Bank nor any of its shareholders, directors, officers, agents, employees or

advisers give, have given or have authority to give, any representations or warranties (express or implied) as to, or in relation to, the accuracy, reliability or

completeness of the information in this Presentation, or any revision thereof, or of any other written or oral information made or to be made available to any

interested party or its advisers (all such information being referred to as "Information") and liability therefore is expressly disclaimed. Accordingly, neither the

Bank nor any of its shareholders, directors, officers, agents, employees or advisers take any responsibility for, or will accept any liability whether direct or

indirect, express or implied, contractual, tortious, statutory or otherwise, in respect of, the accuracy or completeness of the Information or for any of the

opinions contained herein or for any errors, omissions or misstatements or for any loss, howsoever arising, from the use of this Presentation.

This Presentation should not be considered as the giving of investment advice by the Bank or any of its shareholders, directors, officers, agents, employees

or advisers. Each party to whom this Presentation is made available must make its own independent assessment of the Bank after making such

investigations and taking such advice as may be deemed necessary. In particular, any estimates or projections or opinions contained herein necessarily

involve significant elements of subjective judgment, analysis and assumptions and each recipient should satisfy itself in relation to such matters.

This Presentation may not be altered in any way, reproduced, published or distributed, in whole or in part, to any other party for any purpose without the

express written permission of the Bank.

Neither this Presentation nor any copy of it may be (a) taken or transmitted into the United Kingdom, Canada, Japan or the United States of America, their

territories or possessions; (b) distributed to any U.S. person (as defined in Regulation S under the United States Securities Act of 1933 (as amended)) or (c)

distributed to any individual outside Australia, Canada or Japan who is a resident thereof in any such case for the purpose of offer for sale or solicitation or

invitation to buy or subscribe for any securities or in the context where its distribution may be construed as such offer, solicitation or invitation, in any such

case except in compliance with any applicable exemption. The distribution of this document in or to persons subject to other jurisdictions may be restricted by

law and persons into whose possession this document comes should inform themselves about, and observe, any such restrictions. Any failure to comply with

these restrictions may constitute a violation of the laws of the relevant jurisdiction. By accepting this Presentation you agree to be bound by the foregoing

Raiffeisenbank: 9M 2019 results 2

Disclaimer

Page 3: Raiffeisenbank · NIM 5.3% 5.9%-0.7 ppt. Sochi Belgorod Volgograd Yekaterinburg Kaliningrad Kaluga Krasnodar Bryansk Lipetsk Moscow Anapa Omsk Orel Perm Petrozavodsk Pyatigorsk Rostov-on-Don

3

Agenda

AO Raiffeisenbank at a glance

Operating environment

Strategy guidance

Financials

Page 4: Raiffeisenbank · NIM 5.3% 5.9%-0.7 ppt. Sochi Belgorod Volgograd Yekaterinburg Kaliningrad Kaluga Krasnodar Bryansk Lipetsk Moscow Anapa Omsk Orel Perm Petrozavodsk Pyatigorsk Rostov-on-Don

AO Raiffeisenbank at a glance

All figures are provided in accordance with Raiffeisenbank IFRS financial statements and may differ from the Russian data in Raiffeisen Bank International AG (RBI) financial report because of the difference arising from

consolidation and translation to Euro.

*Middle business means companies with revenue from 500 mn RUB to 5 bn RUB

Business growth combined with high profitability and the best credit quality

Overview:Ratings:

Baa3

BBB

AAA(RU)

ruAAA

In Russia since

1996

>120 YEARSof banking tradition as part

of Raiffeisen Bank

International

systemically important

Bank in Russia

# 2 in premium banking by

Frank research Group

# 2 among most reliable

banks in Russia by Forbes

Best foreign investment

bank in Russia by EMEA

Finance

The best Russian bank in

Private Banking by

Euromoney

Balance sheet (RUB bn) 9M 2019 2018 Change

Total assets 1 168.8 1 126.0 +3.8%

Liquid assets 300.3 365.2 -17.8%

Gross Loans 784.2 689.4 +13.8%

Retail 299.4 266.8 +12.2%

Middle* 76.9 57.4 +34.0%

SME 26.5 22.0 +20.4%

Large corporate 381.4 343.3 +11.1%

Customer accounts 858.1 872.4 -1.6%

Retail 463.2 466.7 -0.8%

Large corporate 273.0 289.0 -5.6%

Middle 51.6 50.2 +2.9%

SME 68.7 64.7 +6.3%

Income statement (RUB bn) 9M 2019 9M 2018

Operating income 65.5 58.1 +12.8%

Profit after tax 28.6 27.4 +4.5%

Key ratios 9M 2019 9M 2018

ROE 24.4% 28.6% -4.2 ppt

CIR 39.1% 39.4% -0.3 ppt

CoR 0.4% 0.06% +0.34 ppt

NIM 5.3% 5.9% -0.7 ppt

Page 5: Raiffeisenbank · NIM 5.3% 5.9%-0.7 ppt. Sochi Belgorod Volgograd Yekaterinburg Kaliningrad Kaluga Krasnodar Bryansk Lipetsk Moscow Anapa Omsk Orel Perm Petrozavodsk Pyatigorsk Rostov-on-Don

Sochi

Belgorod

Volgograd

Yekaterinburg

Kaliningrad

Kaluga

Krasnodar

Bryansk

Lipetsk

Moscow

Anapa

Omsk

Orel

Perm

Petrozavodsk

Pyatigorsk

Rostov-on-DonSamara

St Petersburg

Saratov

Smolensk

SyktyvkarTula

TyumenUfa

Miass

Cherepovets

Yaroslavl

Nizhny Novgorod

Voronezh

Novorossiysk

KurskZheleznogorsk

Saransk

Kazan

Kirov

Chelyabinsk

Ryazan

Surgut

Tomsk

Berdsk

Novosibirsk

Kemerovo

Krasnoyarsk

Irkutsk

AO Raiffeisenbank at a glance

Branch network, digital reach and client base

175 outlets and 5 branches

01.10.2019 (plans for 1Q

2020 – 130 outlets)

> 98 cities with remote SME digital

service o/w 42 in Moscow region in 3Q

2019

2 087 RBRU ATMs and

22 567 ATMs partners’ network

5

>2 mn of active clients

Page 6: Raiffeisenbank · NIM 5.3% 5.9%-0.7 ppt. Sochi Belgorod Volgograd Yekaterinburg Kaliningrad Kaluga Krasnodar Bryansk Lipetsk Moscow Anapa Omsk Orel Perm Petrozavodsk Pyatigorsk Rostov-on-Don

AO Raiffeisenbank at a glance

Successful story of digital development

6

Digital Cities

30% less branch traffic in the network y-

o-y at 08/2019

Rebalancing sales and service model,

maintaining highly efficient branch

network

Branch Strategy 2020

Branches

- 25%

High-tech remote service model and technological development

of the contact center and branches

Investments in digital services have almost doubled in 2019 and

will continue to grow in 2020

Digital service model operating in

over 100 cities without branches

Remote delivery team

managing logistics

77%70%

32

4 Investment in innovation is paying off

20202019

50%

Shares of products opened online in 2019 vs. 2017

Deposits Saving

Acc.Loans

77%

of clients actively

use mobile app

Increase in mobile operations 2019 vs. 2017:

Internal transfers x 8.0

C2C transfers x 4.0

C2C between client cards x 1.4

Payment services x 2.0

+24 PP +32 PP +42 PP

1 Customers are actively going into digital channels

Page 7: Raiffeisenbank · NIM 5.3% 5.9%-0.7 ppt. Sochi Belgorod Volgograd Yekaterinburg Kaliningrad Kaluga Krasnodar Bryansk Lipetsk Moscow Anapa Omsk Orel Perm Petrozavodsk Pyatigorsk Rostov-on-Don

Raiffeisenbank: 9M 2019 results based on RBI public results

АО Raiffeisenbank at a glance

Strong contribution to the Group’s profitability

SoutheasternEurope

A*: EUR 26.5 bn

P: EUR 366 mn

SА: 17.6%

NPL: 3.8%

NIM: 3.63%

CentralEurope

А: EUR 41.6 bn

P: EUR 384 mn

SА: 27.6%

NPL: 2.6%

NIM: 2.2%

Group Corporates &Markets**

А: EUR 56.0 bn

P: EUR 303 mn

SА: 37.1%

NPL: 1.9%

NIM: 1.27%

Reconciliation

A: EUR - 26.2 bn

P: EUR - 816 mn

Eastern Europe(incl. Russia)

А: EUR 21.6 bn

P: EUR 707 mn

SA: 14.3%

NPL: 2.6%

NIM: 5.79%

Russia

А: EUR 16.5 bn

P: EUR 490 mn

NPL: 1.9%

NIM: 5.0%

Corporate Center***

А: EUR 31.0 bn

P: EUR 354 mn

SА: 22.5%

€ 150.8 BN totalassets€ 1 299 MN profit

before tax

* А — assets, P — profit before tax, SА — share in total RBI’s assets, NPL — share of non-performing loans, NIM — net interest margin

** Operating business booked in Austria

*** Central control functions in RBI AG, RBI AG’s equity participations, other Group units and minority interests 7

56.5% 55.2%

38.7%

Lowest cost to income ratio among CEE segments Highest ROE before tax among CEE segments

21.3%

15.4%

34.1%Central Europe Southeastern Europe Russia

Page 8: Raiffeisenbank · NIM 5.3% 5.9%-0.7 ppt. Sochi Belgorod Volgograd Yekaterinburg Kaliningrad Kaluga Krasnodar Bryansk Lipetsk Moscow Anapa Omsk Orel Perm Petrozavodsk Pyatigorsk Rostov-on-Don

Raiffeisenbank: 9M 2019 results, Interfax ranking

АО Raiffeisenbank at a glance

Top 7 bank in Russia by net profit and #10 by assets

Foreign owned: 6.8%,

0/w Raiffeisen: 1.4%

Market share

State owned: 68.7%

Privately owned: 24.5%

8

665.4

134.0 54.7 48.3 38.0 32.5 30.4 23.0 22.2 16.7

#7 by net profit (in bn RUB)2 781.4

979.1 684.3

334.4 179.4 142.3 138.8 126.4 119.1 85.3

#4 by retail current accounts (in bn RUB)

Market share

State owned: 67.8%

Privately owned: 21.8%

6996.1

2930.2

601.9 555.1 447.9 398.8 352.3 334.8 301.9 279.8

#9 by retail loans (in bn RUB)

Market share

State owned: 71.1%

Privately owned: 213%Foreign owned: 7.6%

0/w Raiffeisen: 1.8%

Foreign owned: 10.4%

0/w Raiffeisen: 5.2%

28.3

14.2

6.2 3.3 3.1 2.2 2.1 1.4 1.2 1.2

#10 by assets (in trn RUB)

Page 9: Raiffeisenbank · NIM 5.3% 5.9%-0.7 ppt. Sochi Belgorod Volgograd Yekaterinburg Kaliningrad Kaluga Krasnodar Bryansk Lipetsk Moscow Anapa Omsk Orel Perm Petrozavodsk Pyatigorsk Rostov-on-Don

AO Raiffeisenbank at a glanceThe highest ROE among peers with high operating efficiency

* CIR is calculated as operating expenses (incl deposit insurance expenses)/ operating profit before provisions and OPEX

** CIR is calculated as operating expenses (excl deposit insurance expenses)/ operating profit before provisions and OPEX and including DIC

*** Unicreditbank doesn’t disclose DIC as separate item in IFRS financial statements

.

NIM CoR ROE CIR * CIR **

Raiffeisenbank 5.1% 0.3% 25.1% 39.5% 37.1%

Rosbank 4.4% 0.9% 7.5% 62.6% 61.4%

Sberbank 5.2% 0.3% 24.1% 37.0% 34.1%

Unicreditbank*** 3.2% 1.4% 8.0% 38.1% -

Tinkoff 22.4% 8.0% 64.3% 43.4% 42.5%

Raiffeisenbank 5.9% 0.04% 28.2% 40.7% 38.7%

Rosbank 4.4% 0.5% 8.2% 67.1% 66.2%

Sberbank 5.5% 0.3% 24.6% 36.0% 33.4%

Unicreditbank 3.8% 2.1% 9.2% 34.7% -

Tinkoff 24.7% 7.0% 69.3% 45.9% 44.2%

1H 2019

1H 2018

Page 10: Raiffeisenbank · NIM 5.3% 5.9%-0.7 ppt. Sochi Belgorod Volgograd Yekaterinburg Kaliningrad Kaluga Krasnodar Bryansk Lipetsk Moscow Anapa Omsk Orel Perm Petrozavodsk Pyatigorsk Rostov-on-Don

Raiffeisenbank: 9M 2019 results. Source: www.fitchratings.com, www.moodys.com, www.acra-ratings.ru, www.raexpert.ru

АО Raiffeisenbank at a glance

The highest rating composition among Russian banks

VR

(rating based on

standalone credit

profile)

IDR

(VR + support)

BCA

(baseline

credit rating)

LR debt rating in local

currency

(BCA + support)

SCA

(standalone credit

worthiness

assessment)

Issuer rating

(SCA +support or

systemic importance)

Rating

of credit

worthiness

bbb- BBB Baa3 aaa AAA(RU) ruAAA

Sberbank

Raiffeisenbank

Unicreditbank

Sberbank

Raiffeisenbank

Rosbank

Sberbank

Raiffeisenbank

VTB

Rosbank

Sberbank

Raiffeisenbank

Sberbank

Raiffeisenbank

Rosbank

Unicreditbank

Rosbank

Raifffeisenbank

VTB

Unicreditbank

bb+ BBB- ba1 Ba1 aa+ AA (RU) ruAA+

Rosbank

Alfa-Bank

Unicreditbank

Gazprombank

Rosselhozbank

Sberbank

Raiffeisenbank

Alfa-Bank

Gazprombank

Rosselhozbank

Unicreditbank

Rosbank

Gazprombank

Rosselhozbank

Alfa-bank

Gazprombank

bb- BB+ ba2 a+ AA(RU) ruAA

Gazprombank Alfa-BankAlfa-Bank

RosbankAlfa-bank Alfa-bank

b- b1 a

RosselhozbankGazprombank

VTB Gazprombank

b3 bb+

Rosselhozbank Rosselhozbank

10

Page 11: Raiffeisenbank · NIM 5.3% 5.9%-0.7 ppt. Sochi Belgorod Volgograd Yekaterinburg Kaliningrad Kaluga Krasnodar Bryansk Lipetsk Moscow Anapa Omsk Orel Perm Petrozavodsk Pyatigorsk Rostov-on-Don

Raiffeisenbank: 9M 2019 results based on public IFRS results

АО Raiffeisenbank at a glance

Strong business model with diversified product range to different customers’ segments

Packages of complex

services

Lending

Acquiring and Cash

collection

Banking cards

Deposits

Payroll projects

Conversion

operations, R-Dealer

Investments and securities

Investment banking

Hedging and

currency operations

Documentary operations

Currency control and liquidity

management products

Clients with revenue > 500 mn ₽ Products and services

Lending

Banking cards

Deposits and investments

Mortgage

Service package

Insurance

Current account& debit cards

Products/services

for private banking clients

Clients with revenue ≤ 500 mn ₽

Settlement

operations

Business cards

Lending

Acquiring and Cash

collection

Payroll projects

Corporate and investment banking Retail SME

Assets*

Gross income **

Net fee and commission result

478.1 BN ₽

15.1 BN ₽

5.7 BN ₽

Assets*

Gross income**

Net fee and commission result

293.1 BN ₽

29.4 BN ₽

8.9 BN ₽

Assets*

Gross income**

Net fee and commission result

25.1 BN ₽

8.5 BN ₽

4.8 BN ₽

* Assets after provisions

** Segment income (including FTP) before provisions and operating expenses 11

Deposits

Conversion

operations, R-Dealer

Currency control

Documentary

business

Page 12: Raiffeisenbank · NIM 5.3% 5.9%-0.7 ppt. Sochi Belgorod Volgograd Yekaterinburg Kaliningrad Kaluga Krasnodar Bryansk Lipetsk Moscow Anapa Omsk Orel Perm Petrozavodsk Pyatigorsk Rostov-on-Don

Operating environment

12

Operating in volatile environment

GDP growth within 9M 2019: 1.2% y/y due to contribution from

manufacturing, agriculture, wholesale and retail trade.

CBR key rate decreased to 7.0%. Inflation decreased vs Y2018 (from

4.3% to 4.0%) as s result of ruble appreciation and seasonal increase in

food supply. Real income of population was slightly increased but still had

negative impact on consumer demand.

Sanctions imposed against by EU and US against Russian state owned

banks did not changed

RUB was volatile throughout the quarter but in the end of period

appreciated against EUR and USD.

Source: 9M 2019 results based on CBR and Raiffeisenbank reports.

Inflation and CBR key rate

9M 2019

7.50%

3.40%

2.50%

2017

5.40%

2016 9M 2018

10.90%

7.80%

4.30%

7.75%

2018

4.00%

7.00%

Inflation CBR key rate

GDP dynamics

1.52.0

1.2

-0.2

2016 2017 2018 9M 2019

FX exchange rate fluctuations

63.8168.87

79.4670.32

60.66 57.6069.47

64.42

2016 20182017 9M 2019

EUR/RUB

USD/RUB

Page 13: Raiffeisenbank · NIM 5.3% 5.9%-0.7 ppt. Sochi Belgorod Volgograd Yekaterinburg Kaliningrad Kaluga Krasnodar Bryansk Lipetsk Moscow Anapa Omsk Orel Perm Petrozavodsk Pyatigorsk Rostov-on-Don

Strategy guidance

Target KPIs focus on four strategic stakeholders

13

CIRROE

NPS

Engagement

Happy shareholders

Happy clients

Happy employeesICSS

Key priorities:

Retail

Remote sales & service model scaling

CX perfection in digital processes

Developing customer relationship in branches, payroll & other

channels

Active customers acquisition on daily banking products

Corporate

Accelerated growth in Middle Market driven by new client acquisition

Customer retention and growth in niche Large Corporate and International segments

Balanced risk approach and strong focus on loan portfolio quality

Focus on E2E processes optimization and automatization

Digital solutions across all product lines

CRM enhancement

Additional focus on NPS and customer satisfaction across sales force and product

teams

Community

Page 14: Raiffeisenbank · NIM 5.3% 5.9%-0.7 ppt. Sochi Belgorod Volgograd Yekaterinburg Kaliningrad Kaluga Krasnodar Bryansk Lipetsk Moscow Anapa Omsk Orel Perm Petrozavodsk Pyatigorsk Rostov-on-Don

Raiffeisenbank: 9M 2019 results based on public IFRS results 14

Assets evolution (bn RUB) Liabilities evolution (bn RUB)

Customer business growth and stable funding base

14

Credit portfolio continues to show growth dynamics both in corporate and retail. Net

loans increased by 14.3% for 9M 2019 vs 2018;

Cash and cash equivalents declined mostly due to decreasing REPO transactions.

But liquid assets continued to be about 26% of total assets.

Customer accounts decreased by 1.6% due to decrease in euro-denominated retail

accounts and revaluation of FX accounts.

* Before provisions (gross loans)

548 643872 858

4533116

117

146 167

13

32

19

2016

31

1.168

41

2017

3737

34

2018

34

68

9M 2019

754843

1.126

3.8%

Equity Wholesale funding

Customer accountsSubordinated debt

Other liabilities

79.0%91.2%

2016

88.2%

2017 2018 9M 2019

91.4%

Financials

Loan* to deposit ratio

160 143160 165

226 194

474 548

673 770

2017

57

754

67

63 71

2016 2018

59

61

1.168

9M 2019

843

1.126

3.8%

Other assets Net loans Cash and cash equivalents Securities

Page 15: Raiffeisenbank · NIM 5.3% 5.9%-0.7 ppt. Sochi Belgorod Volgograd Yekaterinburg Kaliningrad Kaluga Krasnodar Bryansk Lipetsk Moscow Anapa Omsk Orel Perm Petrozavodsk Pyatigorsk Rostov-on-Don

Financials

15

Loan portfolio growth combined with high assets quality

Raiffeisenbank: 9M 2019 results based on public IFRS results and management accounts

Loan portfolio showed growth by 13.8%, retail by 12.2%, corporate

portfolio showed growth by 14.7% (main drivers: mid business

(+34.0%), SME business (+20.4%));

Credit portfolio quality is one of the best on the market, with NPL

90+ dpd amounting to 1.4% from loan portfolio.

187 221 267 299

312346

422485

2016 9M 20192017 2018

567499

689

784

+13.8%

Corporate loans Retail loans

Gross loans (bn RUB) Retail loans (bn RUB)

71 96 118 134

89103

128143

1811

17

2016

1

2018

4

2017

19022

9M 2019

188

221

266

299

+12.2%

Unsecured loans Credit cards and overdraftsCar loansMortgage loans

2016

3.6%

2017

4.2%

3.1%

2018 9M 2019

6.7%

1.6%

3.1%

1.4%

2.5%

Stage 3+POCI90+pdp

IAS 35 IFRS 9

NPL and impaired loans as % of loan portfolio

Page 16: Raiffeisenbank · NIM 5.3% 5.9%-0.7 ppt. Sochi Belgorod Volgograd Yekaterinburg Kaliningrad Kaluga Krasnodar Bryansk Lipetsk Moscow Anapa Omsk Orel Perm Petrozavodsk Pyatigorsk Rostov-on-Don

Financials

16

Low concentration levels, well diversified loan portfolio

Raiffeisenbank: 9M 2019 results based on public IFRS results

Individuals

Transport storage and communication

Trade

6.2%

Manufacturing

Agriculture, hunting and forestry

Mining

Real estate

38.2%

Financial services

14.0%

Health and social work

Hotels and restaurants

Electricity gas and water supply

6.9%

Other

21.9%

5.3%

2.0%

1.3%

0.5%

0.5%

2.2%

1.1%

9M 2019 2018

Industry breakdown

2016 2017 2018

1.5%

6.0%

9M 2019

2.7%

6.2%6.8%

5.1%

8.1%

4.7%

Related party share in assets

Related party share in funding

Related parties exposure

FX share in assets

26.3%

FX

73.7%

41.8%FX

58.2%

FX share in liabilities

Loan portfolio is well diversified by industries;

Related party exposure in assets is 8.1% of total assets mostly

represented by overnight placements and derivatives;

On liabilities side related party share is presented by 3 sub loans;

FX share in liabilities decreased to 41.8% (- 6.9% vs Y 2018). The

Bank hedges FX risk by derivative transactions

Page 17: Raiffeisenbank · NIM 5.3% 5.9%-0.7 ppt. Sochi Belgorod Volgograd Yekaterinburg Kaliningrad Kaluga Krasnodar Bryansk Lipetsk Moscow Anapa Omsk Orel Perm Petrozavodsk Pyatigorsk Rostov-on-Don

Financials

17

Stable customer funding

Raiffeisenbank: 9M 2019 results based on public IFRS results

v

216.4236.5

187.5

156.8

2018 9M 2019

-16.4%

+9.3%

Current accounts Term deposits

Corporate customer accounts (in bn RUB)

353.6 337.9

113.2 125.3

2018 9M 2019

+10.7%

-4.4%

Current accounts Term deposits

Retail customer accounts (in bn RUB)

Debt funding maturity profile (in bn RUB)

10.723.5

67.4

Over 5 years

0.0

Demand

whithin 1 year

0.2

From 1 to 5years

0.0

67.4

23.5

Due to other banks Sub loans

Corporate current accounts increased by 9.3% with term deposits

decreasing by 16.4% (due to scheduled maturity). Excl FX effect

corporate accounts stay stable y/y

Retail term deposits increased by 10.7% with slight reducing customer

accounts by 4.4% (+1.6% excl FX effect); Excluding FX effect there is

rise in total retail customer accounts by 4.5% with outflow from euro-

denominated accounts.

The Bank is mostly funded by customer accounts. Interbank funding is

short term. Funding from shareholders is represented by 3

subordinated loans.

Page 18: Raiffeisenbank · NIM 5.3% 5.9%-0.7 ppt. Sochi Belgorod Volgograd Yekaterinburg Kaliningrad Kaluga Krasnodar Bryansk Lipetsk Moscow Anapa Omsk Orel Perm Petrozavodsk Pyatigorsk Rostov-on-Don

Financials

18

Strong capital adequacy ratios and prudent capital management

Raiffeisenbank: 9M 2019 results based on public IFRS results and CBR regulatory reporting

13.63%13.27%

9.94%

10.17%

2017

10.63%

9.44%

1Q 2018

9.56%10.48%

10.33%

13.02%

1H 2018

9.79%

10.55%

13.03%

2018

11.14%

13.98%

9M 2019

N 1.1 N1.0N 1.2

CBR capital ratios

135.8 144.3 147.5 162.6 189.7

1H 2018

24.6%

24.7% 20.6%

2017

24.1%

1Q 2018

26.6%

21.1%

24.2%

21.6%

2018

26.1%

22.6%

9M 2019

Total capital Total CAR Tier 1 CAR

IFRS capital ratios

4.500 4.500 4.500 4.500 4.500

1.875 2.000 2.125 2.250 2.500

1.0000.650

From Oct 19From April 19

0.650

From Jan 19

0.650

From July 19

0.650

From Jan 20

7.025 7.150 7.275 7.4008.000

Min CET 1(N1.1)Buffer for systemically important banks Capital conservation buffer

Regulatory changes introduced

Regulatory ratios are significantly higher than min required

N 1.0 is 13.98% (min 8) for 9M 2019

Capital adequacy ratio based on Basel III is one of the highest

on the market in 2019

In end December 2018 CBR approved IRB–approach for

calculation of corporate RWA for Raiffeisenbank

Bank is well prepared for regulatory changes, ratios are higher

than required taking into consideration higher buffers since 2019

Raiffeisenbank: 9M 2019 results based on public IFRS results and CBR regulatory reporting

Page 19: Raiffeisenbank · NIM 5.3% 5.9%-0.7 ppt. Sochi Belgorod Volgograd Yekaterinburg Kaliningrad Kaluga Krasnodar Bryansk Lipetsk Moscow Anapa Omsk Orel Perm Petrozavodsk Pyatigorsk Rostov-on-Don

Financials

19

Historically high profitability

Operating profit (before provisions and operating expenses) showed

growth by 12.8% to 65.5 bn RUB driven by growth in Net interest income

by 8.9% and Net fee and commission income by 16.9% (drivers:

commissions on settlement transactions, documentary business and

guarantees, fiduciary activities, credit facility fee);

Provisions created for 9M 2019 in amount of 2.4 bn RUB vs amount of

0.3 bn RUB created for 9M 2018. Cost of risk is - 0.4%;

Profit after tax reached 28.6 bn RUB for 9M 2019.

8.4

16.4 17.8

45.152.6

1.06.40.9

20182017

68.8

79.8

+16.0%

Other incomeF&C and commision incomeNet interest income Trading result

7.812.6 14.7

38.542.0

9M 2019

5.61.3

9M 2018

1.0

58.165.5

+12.8%

0.65%

0.50%

Cost of risk

38.5 -3.5

2017

-3.1

2018

-2.4-0.3

9M 2018 9M 2019

Provisions for loan impairement

0.06%

0.40%

Profit after tax (in bn RUB) and ROE

25.7%25.1%

ROE

29.1 33.7

20182017Net profit

28.6%24.4%

27.4 28.6

9M 2018 9M 2019

Provisions (in bn RUB) and Cost of riskOperating profit (in bn RUB)

Raiffeisenbank: 9M 2019 results based on public IFRS results and CBR regulatory reporting

Page 20: Raiffeisenbank · NIM 5.3% 5.9%-0.7 ppt. Sochi Belgorod Volgograd Yekaterinburg Kaliningrad Kaluga Krasnodar Bryansk Lipetsk Moscow Anapa Omsk Orel Perm Petrozavodsk Pyatigorsk Rostov-on-Don

Financials

High operating efficiency

20

11.1 10.8

14.417.6

1.71.81.3

2017 2018

2.5

28.5

32.7

+14.7%

Staff costs Deposit insurance expenses Other expensesIT investments

Cost to income ratioOperating expenses (in bn RUB)

7.3 8.0

12.514.1

1.91.2

9M 2018

2.51.0

9M 2019

22.925.6

+12.0%

2018

41.4%

2017

41.0%

9M 2018 9M 2019

39.4% 39.1%

Operating expenses grew by 12% within 9M 2019 and mostly caused by growth of maintenance expenses of premises and equipment,

deposit insurance expenses, staff cost;

Deposit insurance expenses also showed growth by 30.6% due to growth in average deposits volumes and inclusion of SME business

deposits in Deposit insurance system. If we exclude operating expenses from CIR calculation it will be about 36.7%.

Raiffeisenbank: 9M 2019 results based on public IFRS results and CBR regulatory reporting

Page 21: Raiffeisenbank · NIM 5.3% 5.9%-0.7 ppt. Sochi Belgorod Volgograd Yekaterinburg Kaliningrad Kaluga Krasnodar Bryansk Lipetsk Moscow Anapa Omsk Orel Perm Petrozavodsk Pyatigorsk Rostov-on-Don

raiffeisen.ru

Thank you!

21

You may address all your questions to IR team at: [email protected]


Recommended