+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Railway Open System Tribology - DiVA portal

Railway Open System Tribology - DiVA portal

Date post: 12-Mar-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
50
SCHOOL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT DOCTORAL THESIS IN MACHINE DESIGN STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN 2018 Railway Open System Tribology
Transcript

SCHOOL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT

DOCTORAL THESIS IN MACHINE DESIGN

STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN 2018

Railway Open System Tribology

Railway Open System Tribology

YEZHE LYU

KTH Royal Institute of Technology

System and Component Design

Department of Machine Design

SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden

ISBN: 978-91-7729-710-9

TRITA-ITM-AVL 2018:6

Academic thesis, which with the approval of KTH Royal Institute of

Technology, will be presented for public review in fulfilment of the

requirements for a Doctor of Engineering in Machine Design. Public

review: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Brinellvägen 85, room

Gladan, at 10:00 on April, 27, 2018.

To my wife, Fangfei

and my daughter, Vilja

献给方飞和橙

Preface

Open system tribology involves the physical and chemical fundamentals

at the interacting surfaces in relative motion. For a long time, people used

to consider friction, wear and lubrication as the major topics of tribology

and neglected the interaction with the surrounding environment. Noise

and particle emissions, for example, strongly affect the health of human

beings and the environment, which should also be considered

simultaneously in tribology research. This thesis attempts to relate

frication, wear, noise and particle emissions from the railway system with

the open environment.

I started my PhD study from an unfavourable beginning within a topic

that I had no interest in. I had felt perplexed for months about whether to

continue the PhD study. I am deeply grateful to Prof. Ulf Olofsson, for it is

he who introduced the field of tribology to me at that difficult time and

encouraged me to continue my study under his supervision. Many thanks

are also given to my co-supervisor Dr Ellen Bergseth, for her consistent

patience, encouragement and support throughout my study. I was

fortunate and happy to learn a great deal from them.

I wish to give my appreciation to all of the people who helped with my

PhD research and preparation of the thesis, including the co-authors of

the appended papers: Assoc. Prof. Stefan Björklund (KTH), Dr Rickard

Nilsson (SLL), Dr Yi Zhu (Zhejiang University), Anders Lindgren

(Tyréns), Martin Höjer (Tyréns), Minghui Tu (KTH).

Thanks are extended to all of my colleagues at KTH: Assoc. Prof. Jens

Wahlström, Assoc. Prof. Anders Söderberg, Mr Peter Carlsson, Mr Staffan

Qvarnström, Dr Kenneth Duvefelt, Dr Mario Sosa, Dr Martin Andersson,

Dr Xuan Sun, Mrs Yingying Cha and Mr Edwin Bergstedt for their advice

and assistance during my studies. Many thanks are given to Prof. Martin

Törngren at KTH for his valuable comments on the thesis.

In addition, I want to acknowledge all of my friends: Ye Tian, Huijun

Wang, Xin Xu, Xuge Fan, Jiaqing Yin, Peng Liu, Dan Li, Linqin Wang,

Zhendong Liu and Yuyi Li for being with me during these years.

Finally, the deepest thanks go to my parents, my lovely wife Fangfei

and my cute daughter Vilja. Your love means everything to me.

Yezhe Lyu Stockholm, February 2018

Abstract

Tribology in the railway system is of increasing interest in the new railway era due to the demand for higher speed and load capacity. Since railway vehicles operate in an open environment, their performance depends greatly on temperature, humidity and natural and artificial contaminants. Meanwhile, the “feedback” of railway vehicles to the surroundings, such as noise and airborne particles, is of great importance to the human health and the environment. Therefore, this thesis aims to investigate the strong interaction between railway tribology and the open environment. The effects of temperatures from -35 °C to 20 °C, relative humidity from 40% to 85%, natural contaminants such as ice particles on friction, wear, noise and airborne particle emissions at the wheel–rail and wheel–block brake contacts have been investigated in both lab- and full-scale contexts.

Papers A and B investigated the effect of temperature, humidity and ice particles on the friction and wear at unoxidized and oxidized wheel–rail contacts. The results indicate that increasing humidity reduces the wear at unoxidized contacts. A decrease in temperature tends to intensify the wear until an ice layer has condensed on the wheel and rail surfaces at -25 °C. Ice particles encourage the generation of oxide flakes at the contacting path, largely inhibiting the wear process.

Paper C, which was a lab-scale test, studied the friction, wear and noise generation from pre-oxidized wheel–rail contact with varied surface features. Major results include that the wear regime transition from mild wear to severe wear is always accompanied by an increase in noise level of 10 dB and a broader bandwidth of noise.

Paper D was a validation of the major findings of paper C in a full-scale test, which also saw an increase in noise level as well as a broader bandwidth when the wheel–rail contact transformed from mild to severe wear.

Paper E studied the effect of humidity on the friction, wear and airborne particle emissions of three railway brake-block materials. The results show that cast iron generated the highest friction coefficient, wear and particle emission, and organic composite the lowest levels.

Paper F conducted a thorough literature review on the open system tribology at the wheel–rail contact. Commonly seen parameters such as temperature, humidity and natural and artificial contaminants on friction, wear, noise and particle emissions were investigated.

Keywords Wheel; Rail; Brake; Environmental conditions; Tribology; Noise; Particle

Sammanfattning

Järnvägsfordonen arbetar i en öppen miljö, vars prestanda och livslängd i form av friktion och nötning beror på temperatur, luftfuktighet samt naturliga och konstgjorda föroreningar. Samtidigt är återkopplingen, som järnvägsfordon ger till omgivningen i form av buller och luftburna partiklar, av stor betydelse för människors hälsa. Därför är målsättningen med denna avhandling att undersöka den starka samverkan som finns mellan järnvägsfordon och den öppna miljön. Effekten av, temperaturer från -35 °C till 20 °C, relativ fuktighet från 40 % till 85 % och naturliga föroreningar som snö, på friktion, slitage, buller och luftburna partikelutsläpp vid hjulräls- och hjulblockbromskontakter har undersökts, både i laboratorier och i full skala. Manuskript A och B undersökte effekten av temperatur, luftfuktighet och snö på friktionen och nötning vid oxiderade och icke-oxiderade hjulrälskontakter. Resultaten visar att en ökad luftfuktighet, minskar nötningen vid icke-oxiderade kontakter. Minskning av temperaturen tenderar att intensifiera nötningen, tills is kondenseras på hjul- och rälsytorna vid -25 °C. Iskristallerna, ökar hastigheten på genereringen av oxidflingor i kontakten, och förhindrar i stor utsträckning nötningsprocessen. Manuskript C, som är ett laboratorieprov, studerade friktionen, nötningen och ljudgenerering från föroxiderade hjulrälskontakter med varierande yttopografi. Viktiga resultat, är att övergången, från mild nötning till svår nötning, alltid åtföljs av en ökad ljudnivå och en ökning av ljudets bandbredd. Manuskript D är en fullskalevalidering av huvudresultatet från Manuskript C, vilket också uppvisade en ökning av ljudnivån om hjulrälskontakten gick från mild till svår nötning åtföljt av en ökning av ljudets bandbredd. Manuskript E studerade effekten av luftfuktighet på friktion, nötning och luftburna nötningspartiklar av tre olika blockbromsmaterial. Resultaten visar att gjutjärn genererade den högsta friktionskoefficienten, nötningsnivån och halten av partikelutsläpp. Blockbromsar tillverkade av organisk komposit, uppvisade den lägsta nivån för alla tre uppmätta parametrar. Manuskript F redovisar en litteraturgenomgång, hur det öppna systemet, påverkar tribologin i hjul-järnvägskontakten. Parametrar som temperatur, fuktighet, naturliga och konstgjorda föroreningar på friktion, slitage, buller och partikelutsläpp diskuterades i detalj.

Nyckelord Hjul; Räl; Broms; Miljöförhållanden; Tribologi; Ljud; Partiklar

Appended papers and the author’s contribution

Paper A

Yezhe Lyu, Yi Zhu, Ulf Olofsson. “Wear between wheel and rail: A pin-

on-disc study of environmental conditions and iron oxides”. Wear, 328–

329 (2015) 277–285. DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2015.02.057.

Contributions: Lyu planned the experiments, did the literature survey,

the major part of the experiments, the data analysis and the major part of

the writing. Zhu performed part of the experiments and writing. Olofsson

supervised the work and wrote part of the paper.

Paper B

Yezhe Lyu, Ellen Bergseth, Ulf Olofsson. “Open system tribology and

influence of weather condition”. Nature Scientific Reports, 6: 32455,

DOI: 10.1038/srep32455.

Contributions: Lyu formulated the research questions and chose the

methodology to answer them. Lyu did the literature survey, the major

part of the experiments, the data analysis and the major part of the

writing. Bergseth did part of the experiments. Bergseth and Olofsson both

supervised the study and wrote part of the paper.

Paper C

Yezhe Lyu, Ellen Bergseth, Ulf Olofsson, Anders Lindgren, Martin

Höjer. “On the relationships among wheel–rail surface topography,

interface noise and tribological transitions”. Wear, 338–339 (2015) 36–

46. DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2015.05.014.

Contributions: The experimental work was equally divided between Lyu,

Bergseth, Olofsson, Lindgren and Höjer. Lyu and Lindgren analysed the

data. All authors were involved in the writing of the text, of which Lyu did

the major part.

Paper D

Yezhe Lyu, Stefan Björklund, Ellen Bergseth, Ulf Olofsson, Rickard

Nilsson, Anders Lindgren, Martin Höjer. “Development of a noise related

track maintenance tool”. The 22nd International Congress on Sound and

Vibration, Florence, Italy, 12–16 July 2015.

Contributions: The experimental work was equally divided between all

the authors. Lyu did the literature review and analysed most of the data.

All authors were involved in writing and editing the text.

Paper E

Yezhe Lyu, Ellen Bergseth, Minghui Tu, Ulf Olofsson. “Effect of

humidity on the tribological behaviour and airborne particle emissions of

railway brake block materials”. Tribology International, 118 (2018) 360–

367. DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2017.10.011.

Contributions: Lyu formulated the research questions and chose the

methodology to answer them. Lyu also did the literature survey, data

analysis and the major part of the writing. Tu did part of the experiments

and writing. Bergseth and Olofsson supervised the work, discussed the

results and wrote part of the text.

Paper F

Ulf Olofsson, Yezhe Lyu. “Open system tribology in the wheel–rail

contact—A literature review”. Applied Mechanics Review, 69 (2017)

060802. DOI: 10.1115/1.4038229.

Contributions: Olofsson formulated the frame of the paper. Lyu did the

major part of the literature survey. Olofsson and Lyu were equally

involved in writing the paper.

Contributed papers not included in this thesis Yi Zhu, Yezhe Lyu, Ulf Olofsson. “Mapping the friction between railway

wheels and rails focusing on environmental conditions”. Wear, 324–325

(2015) 122–128.

Yezhe Lyu, Ellen Bergseth, Ulf Olofsson. “The effect of subzero

temperature and snow on the tribology of wheel–rail contact”.

Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Railway

Technology. Paper 153.

Benjamin White, Roger Lewis, Ulf Olofsson Yezhe Lyu. “The

contribution of iron oxides to the wet-rail phenomenon”. Proceedings of

the Third International Conference on Railway Technology. Paper 154.

Martin Höjer, Ellen Bergseth, Ulf Olofsson, Rickard Nilsson, Yezhe Lyu.

“A noise related track maintenance tool for severe wear detection of

wheel–rail contact”. Proceedings of the Third International Conference

on Railway Technology. Paper 146.

Yezhe Lyu, Jens Wahlström,Vlastimil Matejka, Anders Söderberg.

“Ranking of conventional and novel disc brake materials with respect to

airborne particle emissions”. Proceedings of the Eurobrake 2017.

EB2017-MDS-012.

Jens Wahlström, Yezhe Lyu, Vlastimil Matejka, Anders Söderberg. “A

pin-on-disc tribometer study of disc brake contact pairs with respect to

wear and airborne particle emissions”. Wear, 384–386 (2017) 124–130.

Jens Wahlström, Vlastimil Matejka, Yezhe Lyu, Anders Söderberg.

“Contact pressure and sliding velocity maps of the friction, wear and

emission from a low-metallic/cast iron disc brake contact pair”.

Tribology in Industry, 39 (2017) 460–470.

Contents

1 Introduction .......................................................................................... 1

1.1 Railway open system tribology ................................................................... 1

1.2 Oxide formation .......................................................................................... 6

1.3 The sliding part of the wheel–rail contact .................................................... 9

1.4 Noise and airborne particle emissions ...................................................... 11

1.5 Objectives ................................................................................................. 14

1.6 Summary of the methods .......................................................................... 15

2 Summary of appended papers .......................................................... 16

3 Discussion .......................................................................................... 19

3.1 Discussion on appended papers ............................................................... 19

3.2 Discussion on the validity of the results .................................................... 22

3.3 Contribution and impact of the thesis ........................................................ 23

4 Conclusions ........................................................................................ 25

5 Future work ......................................................................................... 26

6 References .......................................................................................... 27

Appended papers

A Wear between wheel and rail: A pin-on-disc study of environmental

conditions and iron oxides

B Open system tribology and influence of weather condition

C On the relationships among wheel–rail surface topography, interface noise

and tribological transitions

D Development of a noise related track maintenance tool

E Effect of humidity on the tribological behaviour and airborne particle

emissions of railway brake block materials

F Open system tribology in the wheel–rail contact—A literature review

INTRODUCTION

1

1 Introduction

This thesis deals with experimental methods at lab-scale and

full-scale levels for investigating the wheel–rail and wheel–

block-brake contacts in the railway open system with respect

to tribological phenomena. The first five appended papers

address the experimental methods for measuring the friction,

wear, sound and airborne particle emissions from the wheel–

rail and wheel–brake contacts. The last appended paper

presents a literature review of recently documented studies of

the open system tribology in wheel–rail contact.

An introduction to the railway open system tribology is

given in Section 1.1. Iron oxides [1], which are believed to be

essential in the tribological process of wheel–rail and wheel–

brake contacts, are introduced in Section 1.2. The importance

of the sliding part in the wheel–rail contact is demonstrated

in Section 1.3. Emission of sound and airborne particles is

discussed in Section 1.4. Section 1.5 presents the objectives of

this thesis. Finally, the methods used in the experimental

studies involved are summarized in Section 1.6.

1.1 Railway open system tribology

Tribology, the science of interacting surfaces in contact, is an

interdisciplinary subject that can be addressed from several

different viewpoints [2]. The interacting surfaces deliver

different characteristics in terms of friction and wear due to

the surface topography, hardness, plastic deformation, etc.

These parameters are often set in the manufacturing

processes and in the material selection of the surfaces and

bulk material. One possible division of tribological systems is

INTRODUCTION

2

by open and closed system tribology. If the system is sealed

away from the external environment, like bearings and seals,

one can call it a closed system; this enables a better control of

the friction, wear and applied lubrication due to the isolation

of external contaminants. In addition, such a system partly or

totally obstructs the emission of sound and particulates. In

contrast, an open system like tyre–road contact is exposed to

the external environment where artificial and natural

contaminants will exert an influence on friction and wear.

Sound and airborne particles from the friction and wear

process have no shield and will be emitted to the surrounding

air [3].

Railway vehicles contain several typical open tribology

systems – like wheel–rail contact and block brake–wheel

tread contact – that are exposed to natural contaminants

such as high humidity, rain, snow, sand and leaves.

Meanwhile, the radiated noise from the railway vehicles may

disturb passengers when a railway vehicle traverses sharp

curves. Particulates will also be generated from the wear

process at the wheel–rail contact and block brake–wheel

tread contact during acceleration and deceleration/braking of

the railway vehicles. Airborne particles can easily drift for

hundreds of metres in the open environment [4], which may

exert both short- and long-term adverse effects on lung

function [5].

In railway operations, a friction coefficient at a proper level

is demanded. Too high or too low a friction coefficient at the

wheel–rail contact will result in a series of adverse

consequences as shown in Figure 1. Too low a level leads to a

schedule delay due to poor traction and brake coefficients

[6]. A conspicuous trend of prolonged braking distances was

INTRODUCTION

3

recorded during the very rainy days in the railway traffic

statistics of the UK and Sweden [7]. Meanwhile, too high a

value causes rapid exhaustion of materials because of high

wear damage.

Temperature and humidity are among the most erratic

environmental parameters and have been found to affect the

friction and wear damage and friction coefficient at clean and

oxidized wheel–rail contact (Figure 2). If the temperature

dropped off to -15 °C, the wheel–rail contact yielded a wear

rate ten times higher compared with the one measured at 10

°C. If a further reduction in temperature to -35 °C was seen,

the wear rate at the wheel–rail contact fell off to the same

level as the one at 10 °C (Figure 3). This change is associated

with both physics and chemistry, in that at -15 °C the

ductility of wheel and rail steel largely decreases and thick

oxide layers that protect the materials flourish at -35 °C.

Figure 1. Typical friction coefficient levels at the wheel–rail

contact and their consequences [3].

INTRODUCTION

4

Figure 2. Friction and wear rate of clean and oxidized rail

material as a function of absolute humidity under varied

temperatures [8, 9].

Other parameters exist in the railway open system

including natural (water, leaves, etc.) and artificial (friction

modifiers and lubricants) contaminants. A large number of

studies have seen the decrease of friction and wear when

water is present at wheel–rail and brake–wheel contacts [10–

18]. Snow (water in solid form) has been proved to strongly

affect the friction coefficient at the wheel–rail contact under

different contact pressures (Figure 3). Although the

mechanism of reducing the friction coefficient using water

presence is still debated, most believe that water encourages

the generation of iron oxides at the contact, inhibiting

INTRODUCTION

5

friction [14, 19]. Further, water was found to have a better

lubrication effect than oil on extremely smooth surfaces Ra

(centreline average roughness) of 0.1 μm, showing a great

potential as an environmentally friendly lubricant [20].

Fallen leaves represent another commonly seen natural

contaminant for railway traffic. Once the leaves are dragged

into the wheel–rail and wheel–brake contacts, they will

chemically react with the steel materials and generate a

coherent black layer on the steel surfaces, reducing the

friction coefficient [21, 22].

Figure 3. Friction coefficient as a function of temperature,

which declined with snow (water in solid form) presenting at

the wheel–rail contact [19].

INTRODUCTION

6

Due to the complexity of the railway system, some artificial

contaminants are frequently added into the wheel–rail

contact to maintain a proper friction level. These include

positive friction modifiers that enhance the friction and

lubricants that reduce the friction. Positive friction modifiers

can be solid or liquid, and most are confidential commercial

products. They are usually added into the wheel head–rail

tread contact for maintaining the friction coefficient at a

proper level (normally 0.2–0.4) to eliminate noise and rail

corrugation [23–25]. A significant side effect of the positive

friction modifiers is that they introduce wheel–rail contact

insulation, resulting in signal interruption [26, 27].

Conversely, lubricants are usually applied to the wheel

flange–rail gauge contact on curving tracks to relieve the

wear and noise problem. A vast number of studies with

varied types of instruments have found that oil-based and

grease-based lubricants significantly downgrade the friction

coefficient at the wheel–rail contact [28–35]. Meanwhile, it is

important to appropriately manage lubrication at the rail

gauge. Over-dosed lubricants are apt to move to the rail head,

causing a loss of friction.

1.2 Oxide formation

This section introduces the iron oxides that are generated at

the wheel–rail contact and wheel–brake contact and

discusses the contribution of iron oxides to friction and wear.

Although the mechanisms of friction and wear at the wheel–

rail contact and wheel–brake contact are of great complexity,

the generation of iron oxide layers on material surfaces is

suggested to be responsible for the friction and wear process.

Mølgaard and Srivastava stated that oxidation clearly leads to

INTRODUCTION

7

the wear of dry surfaces of ferrous materials at moderate and

high sliding speeds, because the wear debris generated under

such conditions is mostly composed of oxides [36].

There are in total fifteen types of iron oxides, which are

different in chemical composition and crystal structure, but

only five kinds are usually found in the context of railway

traffic under different environmental conditions. Suzumura

et al. applied a portable X-ray diffractometer equipped with

X-ray fluorescence in situ and identified the iron oxides as

follows: hematite (Fe2O3) and magnetite (Fe3O4), which are

anhydrous, and goethite (α-Fe2O3·H2O), akaganeite (β-

Fe2O3·H2O) and lepidocrocite (γ–Fe2O3·H2O), which are

hydrated (also called rust) and only differ in crystalline

system and colour [37]. Iron oxides can naturally form on the

surfaces of wheel, rail and brake in an atmospheric

environment, but will generate more promptly during sliding

at the wheel–rail contact and wheel–brake contact where

temperature is high.

In an atmospheric environment, iron oxides will slowly

form through electrochemical corrosion, which involves the

oxidation of wheel and rail steels by oxygen as the oxidizing

agent [38]. This reaction usually occurs in wet weather (high

relative humidity), where the aqueous layer covering the

wheel and rail surfaces will act as an electrolyte (as shown in

Eq. 1). Under such conditions, the oxidation rate is controlled

by the amount of electrolyte (available water) and the

products are usually hydrated.

𝟒 𝑭𝒆(𝒔) + 𝟑 𝑶𝟐 (𝒈) → 𝟐𝑭𝒆𝟐𝑶𝟑 ∙ 𝒙𝑯𝟐𝑶 (1)

INTRODUCTION

8

When the weather is dry (low relative humidity),

electrochemical oxidation is unlikely to happen, or the rate of

reaction becomes quite low. However, oxidation of steel

would still happen through a thermal corrosion process.

Under such conditions, the water layer is not necessary and

the temperature becomes the controlling factor. With

increasing temperature, the diffusion of iron ions and oxygen

is expedited, speeding up the oxidation reaction. At room

temperature, the oxide layer is very thin, about several nm,

while a thick and coherent oxide layer will form at elevated

temperatures. Transformations between different types of

oxides may happen under alternating dry and wet cyclic

weather conditions. Generally, rusts (hydrated oxides) tend

to transform to anhydrous oxides under dry conditions and

the other way around under wet conditions [39]. The

dominating mechanism of the transformation is “topotaxy”,

which includes all chemical solid state reactions where one

crystal orientation changes to another crystal orientation

[40].

If the surface of the metal is smooth enough, a

homogeneous oxidation will occur, where a coherent and

compacted oxide layer will form on the surface. But this is

usually not the case for the wheel and rail surface. Since the

wheel and rail surfaces constantly experience rolling-sliding

contact, plastic deformation and tiny defects will occur on the

surfaces, encouraging pitting and localized corrosion. The

oxide will first form as a spot. If this spot has enough binding

force with the metal, it will stay and become an oxide layer

(oxide island), preventing the metals from experiencing

severe wear. On the contrary, if the binding force between the

oxide spot and the surface is too weak, it will be sheared off

INTRODUCTION

9

by the rolling-sliding contact and pulverized into tiny

particles, accelerating the abrasive wear as third bodies [41].

Great efforts have been made to study the influence of

oxides on the friction at the wheel–rail contact and wheel–

brake contact. A large drop of friction and wear was found at

the wheel–rail contact where an intact oxide layer formed

and thoroughly covered the surface [42, 43]. Iwabuchi et al.

demonstrated that the friction coefficient declines as the

oxide thickness increases, based on their own research in

combination with the work of Kragelʹskiĭ [44, 45]. Beagley

found that the friction coefficient becomes extremely low

when a paste containing iron oxide and a small amount of

water is formed [43]. An increase in the coverage of the oxide

layer leads to a decline in the wear coefficient [46]. The oxide

layers formed also contribute to a decrease in wear rate. Zhu

and Olofsson conducted a pin-on-disc study and found that

the oxidized samples at high humidity yielded a lower wear

rate compared with the unoxidized samples [47]. Stott

revealed that oxidation is beneficial for reducing wear during

sliding of metals by preventing metal–metal contact.

Thermal corrosion can be easily induced by frictional heat

[1].

1.3 The sliding part of the wheel–rail contact

Unlike the pure sliding wheel–brake contact, wheel–rail

contact can be divided into two types – the contact between

wheel tread and rail head, and the contact between wheel

flange and rail gauge (Figure 4). The wheel tread–rail head

contact is usually seen on straight tracks and wheel flange–

rail gauge contact always occurs on sharp curves. As with the

INTRODUCTION

10

wheel–brake contact, the wheel flange–wheel gauge contact

is also a pure sliding contact accompanied by very high

contact pressure and large plastic deformation. The wheel

flange–rail gauge contact usually experiences wear transition

from severe to catastrophic and wheel tread–rail head

contact from mild to severe [48]. The wheel tread–rail head

contact is a rolling-sliding contact that contains stick (no-

slip) and slip regions [49].

Figure 4. Schematic of two typical types of wheel–rail contact:

a) wheel tread–rail head contact and b) wheel flange–rail

gauge contact.

Zhu has described the stick-slip contact condition between

the wheel tread and rail head [50]. Briefly, there should be a

proper ratio between the rolling (stick) part and sliding (slip)

part at the wheel tread–rail head contact. The sliding (slip)

part always exists and results in the frictional heating of both

the wheel and rail [51]. As a consequence of occasionally

excessive temperature, phase transformation and materials

softening will happen, resulting in some troublesome damage

such as melting and cracks on the wheels and rails [52].

Besides, the slip (sliding) part dominates the friction

INTRODUCTION

11

coefficient at the wheel–rail contact, restricting the load

capacity, traction and brake coefficient. Therefore, the sliding

part of the wheel tread–rail head contact deserves detailed

investigation and a large number of studies have focused on

this topic [53–59].

1.4 Noise and airborne particle emissions

The railway system strongly interacts with the surroundings,

and is not only susceptible to environmental conditions but

also releases feedback such as noise and airborne particles.

The emission of noise and airborne particles works against

the promotion of the new era of the railway system with

higher speeds and loading capacities, and thus draws

considerable attention from railway engineers [60].

Noise from the railway system can be generated both on

straight tracks and curves. Rolling noise and impact noise are

usually heard on straight tracks and stem essentially from the

imperfect surface conditions of the wheels and rails. The

continuous noise caused by regular surface roughness is the

rolling noise and the intermittent noise due to imperfect rail

joints, wheel flats, switch and crossing gaps is called impact

noise [61]. Rolling noise is thought to be the main source of

noise from the railway system and can be reduced through

measures such as smoothing wheel and rail surfaces and

shielding bogies and rails [61, 62]. The same counter-

measures also work efficiently for impact noise.

Squeal noise is believed to be generated through a stick-slip

mechanism. When traversing a curve, the traction force

makes the wheel slip whilst the static friction makes the

wheel stick. These two forces alternatively dominate and

INTRODUCTION

12

motivate the resonance of the wheels (vibration around the

natural frequency) [63]. Squeal noise is much more

inadvertent than rolling noise and impact noise, which is

thought to be easier to eliminate. Since static friction is one

important parameter that activates squeal noise, friction

management at the wheel–rail contact becomes important

for its control, and will involve all parameters affecting the

friction coefficient at the wheel–rail contact, such as surface

finishing [64], friction modifiers [65], temperature, humidity

[66] and water presence [67]. The brake contact also radiates

squeal noise, though current research mainly focuses on the

automotive context [68–72]. Possible measures to reduce the

squeal noise from automotive brake systems include

modifications to the structure of the brake parts and

materials. Currently there is a knowledge gap on the effect of

environmental conditions on squeal noise.

Like noise, airborne particles will be emitted from both

wheel–rail contact and wheel–brake contact. The inhalable

particles are thought to be one of the most worrying

environmental problems, raising a series of public health

issues. Most studies on airborne particle emissions from the

railway system were conducted in the field, where the

contributions of wheel–rail contact and wheel–brake contact

are hard to distinguish [61]. Most of the emitted particles are

found to be deposited near railway tracks, but still some 25%

will drift for over 100 metres [61]. Figure 5 shows the

deposition of particles that originated from the railway

system on railway tracks. Nieuwenhuijsen et al. made a

comparison study of the abundant published measurements

of airborne particles from railway transport and saw a clear

indication that underground systems generate a higher

INTRODUCTION

13

concentration compared with above-ground environments

[73]. The composition of the emitted particles is complex.

More than fifteen elements were detected from the particles

collected from around the tracks [74, 75], among which Fe,

Cu, Zn and Mn are dominant [76]. One lab-scale test

dedicated to airborne particles from the wheel–rail contact

witnessed a vast number of nano-sized particles at elevated

temperatures, which usually results from high contact

pressure and sliding speed [55]. The only study found on the

effect of environmental conditions on particle emissions from

wheel–rail contact indicated that grease-lubricated wheel–

rail contact generated fewer particles than dry, water- and

oil-lubricated ones [77]. Investigations into the effect of open

systems on the particle emissions from railway brake systems

are also rare, and the only one found was conducted by

Olofsson [4]. Since the brake contacts should always be kept

clean to avoid losing braking efficiency, further research is

encouraged on environmental conditions (such as

temperature and humidity) rather than the additives that are

commonly found at wheel–rail contact.

Figure 5. Worn particles deposited at the rail foot during a field

test at Högdalen test depot, highlighted with arrows.

INTRODUCTION

14

1.5 Objectives

The open system tribology of the railway system is an open

field and one which is not studied sufficiently, especially the

area of wheel–block brake contact. The purpose of this thesis

is to enhance the scientific knowledge about the effect of

open environmental conditions on the friction, wear, noise

and particle emissions from wheel–rail contact and wheel–

block brake contact. This purpose is achieved by fulfilling the

following objectives:

• Develop experimental methods in terms of a test stand

for measuring the friction and wear from both the wheel–rail

contact and wheel–block brake contact under commonly

seen and well-controlled environmental conditions, e.g.

temperature above 0 °C and relative humidity.

• Apply the above test design to investigate the effect of

relative humidity and different contact pairs on the friction,

wear and airborne particle emissions from wheel–brake

contacts.

• Update and use the above test stand in more hostile

environments and investigate the effect of sub-zero

temperatures on the tribology at the wheel–rail contact.

• Investigate the relationships among rail surface

grinding features, generated noise and wear behaviours at

the wheel–rail contact in a lab-scale test. If they are related,

verify the validity in full-scale tests.

• Implement a thorough literature review of open

system tribology at the wheel–rail contact, summarize the

archived studies and suggest future work.

INTRODUCTION

15

1.6 Summary of the methods

This thesis comprises five different experimental studies

and one literature review on railway open system tribology.

In the appended papers, varied test methods are used based

on two different pin-on-disc tribometers (pin-on-disc I and

pin-on-disc II) and one full-scale equipped metro. In Table 1

the test apparatus, testing conditions and responses in all

appended papers are summarized.

Table 1. Summary of the test methods in the appended papers.

Appended papers A B C D E

Test

apparatus

Pin-on-Disc I × × ×

Pin-on-Disc II × ×

Full scale ×

Testing

conditions

Temperature

(°C) 3/10/20 -35/-25/-15/-5/3 20±2 20±2

Relative

humidity (%) 40/55/70/85 40±5 25/50/75

Contact

pressure (MPa) 900 900/1500 750 0.8

Sliding speed

(m·s-1) 0.01 0.01

0.055/

0.046 0.45

Responses

Friction × × × ×

Wear × × × × ×

Sound × ×

Particles ×

SUMMARY OF PAPERS

16

2 Summary of appended papers

This thesis comprises six appended papers (Appendices A to

F) that fulfilled the objectives of the thesis work. A summary

of the six appended papers is presented below.

Papers A and B describe a test stand for measuring the

friction and wear at the wheel–rail contact during varied

temperature and humidity levels. This test stand was put in a

well-controlled climate chamber isolated from its

surroundings. Paper C applied a professional acoustic

measuring technique in this climate chamber for excluding

background sound from the surroundings. Paper D

complemented this technique and reformulated it for a

running metro train so a full-scale field test could be

conducted. Paper E improved the test stand described in

Papers A and B and used it to measure the particle emissions

from wheel tread–brake block contact. Paper F conducted a

literature review of recently published studies on open

system tribology at the wheel–rail contact and suggested

possible directions for future research.

Paper A presents a study on the effect of commonly seen

environmental conditions (temperature and humidity) and

pre-treated oxide layers on the wear of wheel–rail contact.

Commercial railway wheels and rails are used as testing

materials in this pin-on-disc study. The results indicate that

wear mechanisms at the wheel–rail contact can be affected

by various environmental conditions and the presence of

oxide layers. Unoxidized wheel–rail contact in dry air was

dominated by adhesive wear. With a decrease in

temperature, abrasion was aggravated and increased the

wear rate. In humid air, wheel–rail contact underwent both

SUMMARY OF PAPERS

17

adhesive and oxidative wear and the self-generated oxide

layers prevented the materials from severe wear. Oxidized

wheel–rail contact is mainly subjected to abrasive wear.

Paper B applied the same test stand as used in Paper A,

which extended the testing temperature down to -35 °C and

added snow instead of humid air. The added snow particles

were found to melt into liquid-like layers due to pressure

melting, encouraging the formation of oxide flakes at the

contact path. With snow presence, the wear at the wheel–rail

contact is insensitive to change of temperature. When snow

was absent, the wheel–rail contact experienced extremely

high friction and wear around -15 °C, owing to the high

brittleness at this temperature. When the temperature

decreased further to -25 °C, a condensed ice layer at the

wheel–rail contact was prone to develop, which acted

similarly to the added snow particles, promoting the flake-

like oxide layers and relieving the wear process.

Paper C added professional acoustic measurement

instruments into similar test stands as used in Papers A and

B, but focused on noise generation. Five different surface

finishing features were tested against their influence on

friction, wear and sound generation. Surface features

perpendicular to the sliding direction generated the lowest

noise level for the whole duration of the test, and a smooth

surface emitted the highest noise level. Meanwhile, an

increase in noise level of 10 dB was always seen when the

wear transitioned from mild wear to severe wear and from

severe wear to catastrophic wear. A broader bandwidth of

sound amplitude was also accompanied with the wear

transition.

SUMMARY OF PAPERS

18

Paper D reformulated the test stand used in Paper C to be

used for the wheel–rail contact of a metro train. This

equipped train was run repeatedly in a 200 m radius test

depot to aggravate the wear transition from mild wear to

severe wear. The results presented similar trends to seen in

the previous lab-scale test (Paper C) in that mild to severe

transition always takes place, with an increase in sound

pressure and broadening of the sound pressure amplitude

distribution.

Paper E employed a pin-on-disc machine placed in a one-

way ventilated chamber to study the friction, wear and

airborne particle emission from three commercial railway

brake block materials within different levels of relative

humidity. The results suggested that cast iron yielded the

highest level of friction, wear and particle concentration, and

organic composite the lowest. Relative humidity also had a

notable effect on the friction, wear and particle emission of a

specific brake-block material.

Paper F reviewed most documented studies of open system

tribology at the wheel–rail contact, covering four important

tribological parameters in the railway system: friction, wear

and sound and particle emissions. In the friction part,

environmental conditions such as temperature, humidity,

natural and artificial contaminants are discussed, while

different wear mechanisms lead the wear part. Promising

trends for future research are suggested to investigate

friction, wear and sound and particle emissions

simultaneously, instead of separately, which is the case in

most studies.

DISCUSSION

19

3 Discussion

3.1 Discussion on appended papers

This thesis aimed to investigate tribological performance at

the wheel–rail contact and wheel–brake contact and reveal

the physical and chemical fundamentals responsible.

Further, the importance of the open system on investigations

of tribology was highlighted, something that is usually

neglected in most cases. In the thesis work, a well-controlled

test stand was designed and implemented for testing the

friction and wear at the wheel–rail contact and wheel–brake

contact, which was also updated for measuring noise and

particle emissions. In this section, the main results achieved

from the thesis work will be discussed according to the

sequence of the appended papers.

Papers A and B investigated the strong influence of

temperature, relative humidity and water on the wear rate of

oxidized and unoxidized wheel–rail contact. One of the key

findings is that an unoxidized wheel–rail contact in a dry

environment largely depends on the temperature, due to the

dominant adhesive wear mechanism. According to the SEM

observations, the adhesive characteristics become more

serious due to ductile-brittle transition in decreasing

temperatures from 20 °C to -15 °C, where micro adhesion

joints deteriorated to large area delamination (spalling of

bulk scraps). However, the condensed ice layer at

temperatures below -15 °C prevented further increase of the

wear rate due to the pressure melting phenomenon [78]. The

possibility of ice condensation at the wheel–rail contact was

confirmed by calculating the saturation vapour pressure at

DISCUSSION

20

low temperatures, which suggested high potential for an ice

condensation layer to form at temperatures below -15 °C [79].

The condensed ice layer encouraged the formation of a flake-

like oxide layer, protecting the surfaces from severe wear

[80]. When the wheel–rail contact is in a damp environment

or water droplets are present, a flake-like oxide layer also

forms in a similar way and prevents severe wear. The pre-

oxidized wheel–rail contact is found to be mainly dominated

by abrasive wear, where the oxide islands sheared off the

surface and then pulverized into tiny pieces of debris,

aggravating the wear process.

In paper C, two rail surface grinding features

(perpendicular and parallel to sliding direction) with two

surface roughness values (rough 0.9 μm Ra and medium 0.4

μm Ra) were compared with a polished surface 0.04 μm Ra,

with regards to the friction, wear and noise generation. This

test design was inspired by a previous study suggesting that

different surface manufacturing has an influence on rolling

noise [81]. Since the surfaces were pre-oxidized, as in the real

cases of operating tracks, the “initial stage”, where the pre-

oxidized layer was not worn off, was likely to be controlled by

ploughing and the featured surfaces (perpendicular and

parallel to sliding direction) yielded a higher friction

coefficient than the polished contact. After the pre-oxidized

layer was worn off, the polished surface started to lead the

friction and wear owing to the high level of adhesion, a result

that conforms to previous studies [82, 83]. Another

phenomenon observed in this study is the wear regime

transitions from mild to severe and from severe to

catastrophic were always accompanied by a sound level

increase of 10 dB and a broadening of sound amplitude

DISCUSSION

21

probability distribution. This test method was verified by

using two different test systems, and the achieved results

from each conformed to each other. Paper D complemented

the measuring technique described in paper C by applying it

to a metro train, which was run in a 200 m radius test curve

to provoke wear and noise generation. Similar results to

paper C were seen, in that the wear regime transition went

along with the increase of sound pressure, encouraging a

further validation of this sound-based technique for wear

conditions of wheel–rail contact in real railway traffic

systems.

Paper E studied the friction, wear and particle emissions

from three commercial railway brake-block materials under

different relative humidity levels, among which cast iron is

dominantly applied. Since the water vapour in the air also

can be detected by the particle counter, only an optical

particle sizer with a relatively large measuring range (0.3–10

μm) was used in this study. Cast iron suggested the highest

friction coefficient, wear rate and particle concentration at all

three relative humidity levels (25%, 50% and 75%), while

organic composite suggested the lowest. Vernersson et al.

also found that cast iron brake blocks yielded a wear rate ten

times higher than that of composite and sintered materials

[84]. A higher particle emission rate for cast iron compared

to composite brake block was observed in [4]. The high

content of Fe (96 wt. %) in cast iron is responsible for the

highest friction, wear loss and particle concentration due to

the high adhesion with its counterpart, the railway steel

wheel. The organic composite brake block is composed of

some 20 ingredients whose properties largely differ from

each other. Some ingredients are prone to adsorb moisture,

DISCUSSION

22

leading to a decline of friction, wear and particle emission. A

very low friction coefficient (less than 0.4) was observed on

organic composite brake block in humid air (50% and 75%

relative humidity), making it an unreliable material for the

complex working conditions of railway brake blocks. It

should also be noted that the current study used a relatively

low contact pressure and sliding speed, which is a reason for

the low particle emissions of organic composite material.

Further study with more hostile conditions is suggested to

check the performance of organic composite at evaluated

temperatures.

A comprehensive literature review on the topic of open

system tribology in the wheel–rail contact was carried out in

Paper F. No similar survey of the state-of-the-art on this

topic was found in the subject documentation. Commonly

seen environmental conditions, e.g. temperature, humidity,

natural and artificial contaminants were discussed in relation

to the friction, wear and sound and particle emissions at the

wheel–rail contact. Since Paper F is a review paper, more

detailed discussion can be found in the paper and will not be

repeated here.

3.2 Discussion on the validity of the results

This thesis comprises four lab-scale experimental studies

and one full-scale experimental study. Some of the observed

results in these studies are validated by reported phenomena

in the railway system. For example, paper B has found that

the wear rate at the wheel–rail contact generally increased

with a decreasing temperature from 3 to -15 °C; this is

confirmed by Green Cargo® (Swedish rail logistic operator),

DISCUSSION

23

who report that the wheel experiences a wear rate that is ten

times higher in winter in the north Sweden area compared

with that in summer. Bombardier® (a train manufacturer)

also report similar phenomena in their servicing of heavy

haul locomotives. Another finding in paper B is that at -35 °C,

an ice condensation layer is prone to form on wheel and rail

surfaces, which decreases the friction and wear. In a meeting

with the Swedish Welding Commission AG 60 Rail welding,

the members confirmed the observation that a thin ice

condensation layer often appears on the rail surface during

winter at temperatures below -15°C.

Paper D is a full-scale experiment for validating the

findings in paper C. In the paper, a wear transition from mild

to severe wear, and from severe to catastrophic wear, always

goes with an increase of generated sound pressure of 10 dB

and a broadening of the sound amplitude probability

distribution. This sound-based detecting technique shows

great potential for monitoring the mild to severe wear

transition in railway traffic and is now used in the Stockholm

metro system (on six trains) to determine maintenance

actions.

3.3 Contribution and impact of the thesis

In the past, people used to study the tribology at the wheel–

rail contact and wheel tread–brake block contact in an

ambient environment but the influences of temperature and

relative humidity were neglected. The research work

contained in this thesis found that different environmental

conditions (e.g. temperature, relative humidity, snow

particles) had a strong influence on the tribology at the

DISCUSSION

24

wheel–rail contact and wheel tread–brake block contact,

indicating that open system tribological contacts should be

tested in the conditions in which they are used.

Papers A and B have found that temperature and relative

humidity have a strong influence on the tribology at the

wheel-rail contact. This is of great importance to the railway

industry, which can choose suitable wheel grades for

operation in different seasons to reduce operation costs.

Papers C and D examined the sound generated and the wear

regime at the wheel–rail contact. A sound-based wear

detection technique has been developed and is now used on

six trains in the Stockholm metro system to determine

maintenance actions. Paper E has demonstrated a high level

of airborne particle emission from cast iron brake blocks,

indicating a need to develop alternative materials. Although

these findings are achieved in KTH and based on the railway

operation in Sweden, they can be beneficial to railway

operators in other areas where railway vehicles are working

in an open system. This thesis is strongly related to the

environment and one of its main focuses is airborne particle

emission. Therefore, it can bring some underlying research

projects from international, national or local foundations

whose aims include environmentally friendly development.

CONCLUSIONS

25

4 Conclusions

This thesis uses experimental methods to investigate two common

open system tribological contacts in the railway system with

regards to friction, wear and sound and particle emissions, both in

lab- and full-scale environments. A thorough literature review has

been carried out on the state of the art of open system tribology at

wheel–rail contact. Main conclusions have been drawn, as follows:

The pin-on-disc test stand placed in a well-controlled climate

chamber is a reliable and efficient method to study the tribology

of varied materials within different environmental conditions.

With this method, not only the temperature and relative

humidity can be controlled, but also plenty of contaminants

such as snow, water and friction additives can be applied.

Temperature and humidity are proven to strongly influence the

friction and wear at wheel–rail contact, by generating different

forms of oxide layers.

If this test stand is improved with professional acoustic

measuring equipment, it can be used to study the sound

generation from different tribological contacts.

Surface finishing features on the rail surface are found to affect

the sound level emitted from the wheel–rail contact; a surface

feature perpendicular to the sliding direction generated less

noise than a parallel feature and smooth surface.

Both lab- and full-scale tests demonstrated that a wear

transition from mild to severe wear is always accompanied by

an increase in noise level and a broadening of noise amplitude

distribution.

Promising research within open system tribology in the future

should take all tribological parameters (friction, wear, sound

and particle emissions) into account simultaneously.

Environmentally friendly additives should also be encouraged.

FUTURE WORK

26

5 Future work

This thesis focused on the commonly seen environmental

parameters (namely temperature, humidity, water) on the

tribology at the wheel–rail and wheel–brake contacts with regards

to friction, wear and noise and airborne particle emissions. The

railway system operates in a complex environment where some

other questions are still open. Therefore, some suggestions for

future research are given by the author:

One imperative trend for future study is to take all tribological

parameters (friction, wear, lubrication, sound and particle

emissions) into account simultaneously, rather than

independently, as is currently the case.

Environmentally friendly lubricants (e.g. those that are water-

based) should be investigated more, instead of traditional oil-

and grease-based ones.

More reliable and complete models for the open system

tribology at the wheel–rail and wheel–brake contacts should be

built to adapt to the complicated working environment of the

railway system.

Most documented studies on open system tribology are at lab

scale for accurately controlling environmental conditions. More

full-scale tests are suggested for validating the findings from

lab-scale studies.

This thesis only considered the micro-sized airborne particles

from wheel–brake contact. However, nano-sized particles are of

great interest as they have been found to form at higher contact

temperatures and adversely affect the health of human beings,

so more exhaustive research on this topic is encouraged.

REFERENCES

27

6 References

[1] F. Stott, The role of oxidation in the wear of alloys, Tribol Int, 31 (1998) 61–71. [2] B. Bhushan, Introduction to tribology, John Wiley & Sons, 2013. [3] U. Olofsson, Y. Lyu, Open System Tribology in the Wheel–Rail Contact—A Literature Review, Appl Mech Rev, 69 (2017) 060803. [4] U. Olofsson, A study of airborne wear particles generated from the train traffic—Block braking simulation in a pin-on-disc machine, Wear, 271 (2011) 86–91. [5] Y. Zhou, Y. Liu, Y. Song, J. Xie, X. Cui, B. Zhang, T. Shi, J. Yuan, W. Chen, Short-term Effects of Outdoor Air Pollution on Lung Function among Female Non-smokers in China, Scientific Reports, 6 (2016) 34947. [6] A. Khalladi, K. Elleuch, Tribological Behavior of Wheel–Rail Contact Under Different Contaminants Using Pin-On-Disk Methodology, Journal of Tribology, 139 (2016) 011102. [7] B. White, R. Nilsson, U. Olofsson, A. Arnall, M. Evans, T. Armitage, J. Fisk, D. Fletcher, R. Lewis, Effect of the presence of moisture at the wheel–rail interface during dew and damp conditions, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 0 0954409717706251. [8] Y. Lyu, Y. Zhu, U. Olofsson, Wear between wheel and rail: A pin-on-disc study of environmental conditions and iron oxides, Wear, 328 (2015) 277–285. [9] Y. Zhu, Y. Lyu, U. Olofsson, Mapping the friction between railway wheels and rails focusing on environmental conditions, Wear, 324 (2015) 122–128. [10] K.-S. Baek, K. Kyogoku, T. Nakahara, An experimental investigation of transient traction characteristics in rolling–sliding wheel/rail contacts under dry–wet conditions, Wear, 263 (2007) 169–179. [11] W. Wang, P. Shen, J. Song, J. Guo, Q. Liu, X. Jin, Experimental study on adhesion behavior of wheel/rail under dry and water conditions, Wear, 271 (2011) 2699–2705. [12] R. Lewis, E.A. Gallardo-Hernandez, T. Hilton, T. Armitage, Effect of oil and water mixtures on adhesion in the wheel/rail contact, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 223 (2009) 275–283. [13] W. Wang, H. Wang, H. Wang, J. Guo, Q. Liu, M. Zhu, X. Jin, Sub-scale simulation and measurement of railroad wheel/rail adhesion under dry and wet conditions, Wear, 302 (2013) 1461–1467. [14] T. Nakahara, K.-S. Baek, H. Chen, M. Ishida, Relationship between surface oxide layer and transient traction characteristics for two steel rollers under unlubricated and water lubricated conditions, Wear, 271 (2011) 25–31.

REFERENCES

28

[15] K. Oldknow, D.T. Eadie, R. Stock, The influence of precipitation and friction control agents on forces at the wheel/rail interface in heavy haul railways, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 227 (2013) 86–93. [16] P. Blau, R. Martin, M. Weintraub, H. Jang, W. Donlon, Frictional behavior of automotive brake materials under wet and dry conditions, Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States), 1996. [17] M. Eriksson, A. Lundqvist, S. Jacobson, A study of the influence of humidity on the friction and squeal generation of automotive brake pads, P I Mech Eng D-J Aut, 215 (2001) 329–342. [18] P.J. Blau, J.C. McLaughlin, Effects of water films and sliding speed on the frictional behavior of truck disc brake materials, Tribol Int, 36 (2003) 709–715. [19] Y. Lyu, E. Bergseth, U. Olofsson, Open system tribology and influence of weather condition, Scientific reports, 6 (2016) 32455. [20] Y. Zhu, U. Olofsson, K. Persson, Investigation of factors influencing wheel–rail adhesion using a mini-traction machine, Wear, 292 (2012) 218–231. [21] Y. Zhu, U. Olofsson, R. Nilsson, A field test study of leaf contamination on railhead surfaces, P I Mech Eng F-J Rai, 228 (2014) 71–84. [22] P. Cann, The “leaves on the line” problem—a study of leaf residue film formation and lubricity under laboratory test conditions, Tribol Lett, 24 (2006) 151–158. [23] M. Tomeoka, N. Kabe, M. Tanimoto, E. Miyauchi, M. Nakata, Friction control between wheel and rail by means of on-board lubrication, Wear, 253 (2002) 124–129. [24] J. Egana, J. Vinolas, N. Gil-Negrete, Effect of liquid high positive friction (HPF) modifier on wheel–rail contact and rail corrugation, Tribol Int, 38 (2005) 769–774. [25] M. Spiryagin, M. Sajjad, D. Nielsen, Y.Q. Sun, D. Raman, G. Chattopadhyay, Research methodology for evaluation of top-of-rail friction management in Australian heavy haul networks, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 228 (2014) 631–641. [26] R. Lewis, E. Gallardo, J. Cotter, D. Eadie, The effect of friction modifiers on wheel/rail isolation, Wear, 271 (2011) 71–77. [27] C. Hardwick, S. Lewis, R. Lewis, The effect of friction modifiers on wheel/rail isolation at low axle loads, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 228 (2014) 768–783. [28] R. Galas, M. Omasta, I. Krupka, M. Hartl, Laboratory investigation of ability of oil-based friction modifiers to control adhesion at wheel–rail interface, Wear, 368–369 (2016) 230–238.

REFERENCES

29

[29] S. Lewis, R. Lewis, G. Evans, L. Buckley-Johnstone, Assessment of railway curve lubricant performance using a twin-disc tester, Wear, 314 (2014) 205–212. [30] H. Chen, S. Fukagai, Y. Sone, T. Ban, A. Namura, Assessment of lubricant applied to wheel/rail interface in curves, Wear, 314 (2014) 228–235. [31] W. Wang, H. Zhang, H. Wang, Q. Liu, M. Zhu, Study on the adhesion behavior of wheel/rail under oil, water and sanding conditions, Wear, 271 (2011) 2693–2698. [32] R. Stock, L. Stanlake, C. Hardwick, M. Yu, D. Eadie, R. Lewis, Material concepts for top of rail friction management–Classification, characterisation and application, Wear, 366 (2016) 225–232. [33] Y. Areiza, S. Garcés, J. Santa, G. Vargas, A. Toro, Field measurement of coefficient of friction in rails using a hand-pushed tribometer, Tribol Int, 82 (2015) 274–279. [34] M. Moreno-Ríos, E.A. Gallardo-Hernández, M. Vite-Torres, A. Peña-Bautista, Field and laboratory assessments of the friction coefficient at a railhead, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 230 (2016) 313–320. [35] B. Wu, Z. Wen, H. Wang, X. Jin, Analysis of wheel/rail adhesion under oil contamination with surface roughness, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology, 227 (2013) 1306–1315. [36] J. Mølgaard, V. Srivastava, The activation energy of oxidation in wear, Wear, 41 (1977) 263–270. [37] J. Suzumura, Y. Sone, A. Ishizaki, D. Yamashita, Y. Nakajima, M. Ishida, In situ X-ray analytical study on the alteration process of iron oxide layers at the railhead surface while under railway traffic, Wear, 271 (2011) 47–53. [38] S. Hœrlé, F. Mazaudier, P. Dillmann, G. Santarini, Advances in understanding atmospheric corrosion of iron. II. Mechanistic modelling of wet–dry cycles, Corrosion science, 46 (2004) 1431–1465. [39] U. Schwertmann, R.M. Cornell, Iron oxides in the laboratory: preparation and characterization, John Wiley & Sons, 2008. [40] R.D. Shannon, R.C. Rossi, Definition of Topotaxy, Nature, 202 (1964) 1000. [41] T. Kayaba, A. Iwabuchi, The fretting wear of 0.45% C steel and austenitic stainless steel from 20 to 650° C in air, Wear, 74 (1981) 229–245. [42] C. Hardwick, R. Lewis, U. Olofsson, Low adhesion due to oxide formation in the presence of salt, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 228 (2014) 887–897.

REFERENCES

30

[43] T. Beagley, The rheological properties of solid rail contaminants and their effect on wheel/rail adhesion, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 190 (1976) 419–428. [44] A. Iwabuchi, T. Kayaba, K. Kato, Effect of atmospheric pressure on friction and wear of 0.45% C steel in fretting, Wear, 91 (1983) 289–305. [45] I.V. Kragelʹskiĭ, Friction and wear, Butterworths, 1965. [46] W. Rainforth, A. Leonard, C. Perrin, A. Bedolla-Jacuinde, Y. Wang, H. Jones, Q. Luo, High resolution observations of friction-induced oxide and its interaction with the worn surface, Tribol Int, 35 (2002) 731–748. [47] Y. Zhu, U. Olofsson, H. Chen, Friction Between Wheel and Rail: A Pin-On-Disc Study of Environmental Conditions and Iron Oxides, Tribol Lett, 52 (2013) 327–339. [48] R. Lewis, U. Olofsson, Mapping rail wear regimes and transitions, Wear, 257 (2004) 721–729. [49] U. Olofsson, R. Lewis, Tribology of the wheel–rail contact, Handbook of railway vehicle dynamics, (2006) 121–141. [50] Y. Zhu, Adhesion in the wheel–rail contact [Doctoral thesis], KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockhom, Sweden, 2013. [51] M. Ertz, K. Knothe, A comparison of analytical and numerical methods for the calculation of temperatures in wheel/rail contact, Wear, 253 (2002) 498–508. [52] L. Wu, Z. Wen, W. Li, X. Jin, Thermo-elastic–plastic finite element analysis of wheel/rail sliding contact, Wear, 271 (2011) 437–443. [53] U. Olofsson, K. Sundvall, Influence of leaf, humidity and applied lubrication on friction in the wheel–rail contact: pin-on-disc experiments, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 218 (2004) 235–242. [54] J. Sundh, U. Olofsson, K. Sundvall, Seizure and wear rate testing of wheel–rail contacts under lubricated conditions using pin-on-disc methodology, Wear, 265 (2008) 1425–1430. [55] J. Sundh, U. Olofsson, L. Olander, A. Jansson, Wear rate testing in relation to airborne particles generated in a wheel–rail contact, Lubrication Science, 21 (2009) 135–150. [56] X. Lu, J. Cotter, D. Eadie, Laboratory study of the tribological properties of friction modifier thin films for friction control at the wheel/rail interface, Wear, 259 (2005) 1262–1269. [57] T. Beagley, C. Pritchard, Wheel/rail adhesion—the overriding influence of water, Wear, 35 (1975) 299–313. [58] H. Harrison, T. McCanney, J. Cotter, Recent developments in coefficient of friction measurements at the rail/wheel interface, Wear, 253 (2002) 114–123. [59] K.M. Lee, A.A. Polycarpou, Wear of conventional pearlitic and improved bainitic rail steels, Wear, 259 (2005) 391–399.

REFERENCES

31

[60] D. Thompson, C. Jones, A review of the modelling of wheel/rail noise generation, J Sound Vib, 231 (2000) 519–536. [61] R. Lewis, U. Olofsson, Wheel–rail interface handbook, Elsevier, 2009. [62] D. Thompson, On the relationship between wheel and rail surface roughness and rolling noise, J Sound Vib, 193 (1996) 149–160. [63] M. Rudd, Wheel/rail noise—part II: wheel squeal, J Sound Vib, 46 (1976) 381–394. [64] Y. Lyu, E. Bergseth, U. Olofsson, A. Lindgren, M. Höjer, On the relationships among wheel–rail surface topography, interface noise and tribological transitions, Wear, 338 (2015) 36–46. [65] D.T. Eadie, M. Santoro, W. Powell, Local control of noise and vibration with KELTRACK™ friction modifier and Protector® trackside application: an integrated solution, J Sound Vib, 267 (2003) 761–772. [66] X. Liu, P.A. Meehan, Investigation of the effect of relative humidity on lateral force in rolling contact and curve squeal, Wear, 310 (2014) 12–19. [67] C. Kootwijk-Damman, Industrial noise in railway yards; the problem of squeal noise, J Sound Vib, 193 (1996) 451–452. [68] S. Yang, R. Gibson, Brake vibration and noise: reviews, comments, and proposals, International Journal of Materials and Product Technology, 12 (1997) 496–513. [69] R. Ibrahim, Friction-induced vibration, chatter, squeal, and chaos—part I: mechanics of contact and friction, Applied Mechanics Reviews, 47 (1994) 209–226. [70] R.T. Spurr, A theory of brake squeal, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers: Automobile Division, 15 (1961) 33–52. [71] S. Earles, P. Chambers, Disc brake squeal noise generation: predicting its dependency on system parameters including damping, International Journal of Vehicle Design, 8 (1987) 538–552. [72] O. Giannini, A. Akay, F. Massi, Experimental analysis of brake squeal noise on a laboratory brake setup, J Sound Vib, 292 (2006) 1–20. [73] M. Nieuwenhuijsen, J. Gomez-Perales, R. Colvile, Levels of particulate air pollution, its elemental composition, determinants and health effects in metro systems, Atmospheric Environment, 41 (2007) 7995–8006. [74] R. Lorenzo, R. Kaegi, R. Gehrig, B. Grobéty, Particle emissions of a railway line determined by detailed single particle analysis, Atmospheric Environment, 40 (2006) 7831–7841. [75] C. Johansson, Källor till partiklar i Stockholms tunnelbana, SLB analys, Miljöförvaltningen i Stockholm [Sources of particles in the Stockholm subway, SLB analysis, Environmental management in Stockholm]. SLB, 6 (2005) 2005. [76] M. Gustafsson, G. Blomqvist, A. Gudmundsson, A. Dahl, E. Swietlicki, M. Bohgard, J. Lindbom, A. Ljungman, Properties and toxicological

REFERENCES

32

effects of particles from the interaction between tyres, road pavement and winter traction material, Science of the total environment, 393 (2008) 226–240. [77] S. Abbasi, U. Olofsson, Y. Zhu, U. Sellgren, Pin-on-disc study of the effects of railway friction modifiers on airborne wear particles from wheel–rail contacts, Tribol Int, 60 (2013) 136–139. [78] T.A. Weber, F.H. Stillinger, Pressure melting of ice, The Journal of chemical physics, 80 (1984) 438–443. [79] A. Wexler, Vapor pressure formulation for water in range 0 to 100 C. A revision, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. A, 80 (1976) 775–785. [80] E.A. Gallardo-Hernandez, R. Lewis, Twin disc assessment of wheel/rail adhesion, Wear, 265 (2008) 1309–1316. [81] P.J. Remington, Wheel/rail rolling noise, I: Theoretical analysis, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 81 (1987) 1805–1823. [82] Y. Xie, J. Williams, The prediction of friction and wear when a soft surface slides against a harder rough surface, Wear, 196 (1996) 21–34. [83] F. Bergman, M. Eriksson, S. Jacobson, Influence of disc topography on generation of brake squeal, Wear, 225 (1999) 621–628. [84] T. Vernersson, R. Lunden, S. Abbasi, U. Olofsson, Wear of railway brake block materials at elevated temperatures: Pin-on-disc experiments, Eurobrake 2012, 2012.


Recommended