+ All Categories
Home > Documents > RANGER Managing the - Aviagenen.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Rowan_Range/RowanRangerMa… · 2...

RANGER Managing the - Aviagenen.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Rowan_Range/RowanRangerMa… · 2...

Date post: 08-Jun-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
24
2016 1 February 2016 Managing the Rowan Ranger RANGE ROWAN ® ROWAN RANGER ® An Aviagen Brand Management Notes Performance Objectives Nutrition Specifications
Transcript
Page 1: RANGER Managing the - Aviagenen.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Rowan_Range/RowanRangerMa… · 2 2016 Introduction The Rowan Ranger®, an Aviagen® specialty product for the slower-growing

2016 1

February 2016

Managing the Rowan RangerFebruary 2016

RANGEROWAN®

RANGEROWAN®

ROWANRANGER

® ROWANRANGER

®

An Aviagen Brand

Management Notes Performance Objectives Nutrition Specifi cations

Page 2: RANGER Managing the - Aviagenen.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Rowan_Range/RowanRangerMa… · 2 2016 Introduction The Rowan Ranger®, an Aviagen® specialty product for the slower-growing

2 2016

Introduction

The Rowan Ranger®, an Aviagen® specialty product for the slower-growing broiler market, has recently been launched into Europe. The Rowan Ranger is the fi rst commercially available product from the Rowan Range®; a range of speciality colored birds developed to meet the needs of selected markets, including the slower-growing, free-range, and organic markets.

The Rowan Ranger is a slower-growing colored broiler which offers excellent performance, superb meat yield and increased customer fl exibility in their product choice. As a slower-growing product there are some key management differences between the Rowan Ranger and the standard Aviagen product range and the purpose of this document is to provide information on how to appropriately manage the Rowan Ranger. The advice covers parent stock, hatchery and broiler management and is based on a combination of data from trials and the expertise and practical knowledge of the Aviagen representatives. This document includes Performance Objectives for parent stock and broilers and Nutrition Specifi cations and should be used in conjunction with, and as a supplement to, the local Parent Stock and Broiler Handbooks supplied by Aviagen.

Parent Stock Management

The main market for the Rowan Ranger is, for now, Europe, where local economic drivers (relatively high stocking densities, high labor and land costs) favor parent stock management which achieves 5% egg production at 23 weeks of age. The information within this document therefore focuses on management strategies which are appropriate for early maturing fl ocks.

For all other general aspects of Rowan Ranger parent stock management the local Parent Stock Handbook should be referred to.

Rearing 0 to 20 weeksManagement of the Rowan Ranger in rear should be similar to that for the standard Aviagen products (for example in Europe the Ross® 308).

Brooding Management

As for all Aviagen products it is important to get the Rowan Ranger off to a good start through the use of good brooding management practices. The brooding set up must provide easy access to feed, water, heat and light (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Good brooding set up showing adequate access to feed, water and light and where the temperature is correct. Chicks are evenly spread throughout the entire brooding pen, eating, drinking and vocalizing contentedly. There is no evidence of panting or huddling.

Achieving the correct environmental temperature is key to getting the birds off to a good start and recommended environmental conditions (Figure 2) must be achieved 24 hours prior to chick placement. Rowan Ranger parent stock are slightly smaller chicks than Ross 308 and may require brooding temperatures 1-2°C higher than those recommended. Equally, inadequate fl oor temperatures at placement may result in the birds becoming easily chilled. Bird behavior should determine whether or not environmental conditions are correct.

Page 3: RANGER Managing the - Aviagenen.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Rowan_Range/RowanRangerMa… · 2 2016 Introduction The Rowan Ranger®, an Aviagen® specialty product for the slower-growing

2016 3

Figure 2. Recommended environmental conditions for chick arrival.

Environmental temperature recommendations after placement are given in Table 1.

Table 1. Dry bulb temperatures required to achieve equivalent temperatures at varying RH. Dry bulb temperatures at the ideal RH at an age are colored red.

Dry Bulb Temperature at RH% °C (°F)

Age (days) 40 50 60 70 80

Day-old 36.0 33.2 30.8 29.2 27.0

3 33.7 31.2 28.9 27.3 26.0

6 32.5 29.9 27.7 26.0 24.0

9 31.3 28.6 26.7 25.0 23.0

12 30.2 27.8 25.7 24.0 23.0

15 29.0 26.8 24.8 23.0 22.0

18 27.7 25.5 23.6 21.9 21.0

21 26.9 24.7 22.7 21.3 20.0

24 25.7 23.5 21.7 20.2 19.0

27 24.8 22.7 20.7 19.3 18.0

Other key management points during brooding include;

• Always monitor actual chick behavior to determine if house temperatures are correct (see Figure 1). If bird behavior indicates that temperatures are too hot (chicks spread out, panting and no vocalization) or cold (chicks huddling around brooder, distress-calling) then appropriate adjustments must be made. A brooding pen used for the fi rst 3-7 days of life will help to keep chicks near the heat source, feed and water.

• Fresh litter, free from dust, should be spread to a depth of 8-10 cm. Where fl oor temperatures are adequate (28-30°C), if fl oor feeding is practiced and litter disposal is a problem then litter depth can be reduced to 1.5–2.5 cm. This will help reduce problems of feed being lost in the litter which can be an issue with these birds as they need to be fed nearly ad libitum for a number of weeks in order to achieve required growth rates

• Monitor crop fi ll regularly during the fi rst 48 hours after placement. The crop should be full, soft and rounded in chicks that have found food and water (Figure 3). If the crop is full, but the original texture of the crumb is still apparent, the bird has not yet consumed enough water. Guidelines for target crop fi ll in the fi rst 48 hours are given in Table 2.

Air temperature = 30°C

Floor temperature = 28-30°C

Relative humidity (RH) = 60-70%

Figure 2. Recommended environmental conditions for chick arrival.

Environmental temperature recommendations after placement are given in Table 1.

Table 1. Dry bulb temperatures required to achieve equivalent temperatures at varying RH. Dry bulb temperatures at the ideal RH at an age are coloured red.

Dry Bulb Temperature at RH% °C

Age (days) 40 50 60 70

Day-old 36.0 33.2 30.8 29.2

3 33.7 31.2 28.9 27.3

6 32.5 29.9 27.7 26.0

9 31.3 28.6 26.7 25.0

12 30.2 27.8 25.7 24.0

15 29.0 26.8 24.8 23.0

18 27.7 25.5 23.6 21.9

21 26.9 24.7 22.7 21.3

24 25.7 23.5 21.7 20.2

27 24.8 22.7 20.7 19.3

Other key management points during brooding include;

• Always monitor actual chick behaviour to determine if house temperatures are correct (see Figure 1). If bird behaviour indicates that temperatures are too hot (chicks spread out, panting and no vocalisation) or cold (chicks huddling around brooder, distress-calling) then appropriate adjustments must be made. A brooding pen used for the fi rst 3-7 days of life will help to keep chicks near the heat source, feed and water.

• Fresh litter, free from dust, should be spread to a depth of 8-10 cm. Where fl oor temperatures are adequate (28-30°C), if fl oor feeding is practiced and litter disposal is a problem then litter depth can be reduced to 1.5 – 2.5 cm.

• Monitor crop fi ll regularly during the fi rst 48 hours after placement. The crop should be full, soft and rounded in chicks that have found food and water (Figure 3). If the crop is full, but the original texture of the crumb is still apparent, the bird has not yet consumed enough water. Guidelines for target crop fi ll in the fi rst 48 hours are given in Table 2.

Page 4: RANGER Managing the - Aviagenen.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Rowan_Range/RowanRangerMa… · 2 2016 Introduction The Rowan Ranger®, an Aviagen® specialty product for the slower-growing

4 2016

Figure 3. Assessing crop fi ll. The chick on the left has found feed and water and has a full crop. The chick on the right has not found feed and water and has an empty crop.

Table 2. Target crop fi ll assessment guidelines.

Time of Crop Fill Check After Placement Target Crop Fill (%age of Chicks with Full Crop)

2 hours 75

8 hours >80

12 hours >85

24 hours >95

48 hours 100

Water ManagementBirds must have an easy and plentiful access to fresh, clean water from placement. Supplementary drinkers should be used during the fi rst 3 days after placement to encourage water intake (see Figure 1). During the fi rst 24 hours walking through the fl ock when checking crop fi ll and replenishing the feed on the paper will create activity in the fl ock, stimulating the chicks to feed and drink. This is particularly important where transport times have been longer.

Feed ManagementFeed management for the Rowan Ranger is the same as that for other standard Aviagen products. The key points are:

• A sieved crumble or mini-pellets should initially be provided in feeder trays (1 for every 80-100 birds) and on paper spread across at least 90% of the brooding area.

• Make feed available in mechanical feeding systems from day one and do not remove paper from the brooding area until the birds have learned to feed from the mechanical feeders.

• Where track feeding or pans are used birds should be gradually introduced to the automated system from 8 days of age onwards. Full transfer to the automated feeding system should occur over a 2-3 day period during which time the amount of feed in the automated system should be gradually increased. During the transitional period to the automated system manual feeding should continue.

• Where spin feeders (fl oor feeding) are used, population size per spinner should be no more than 1000-1500 birds, depending on the pen shape/spinner type. Pellets should be of good physical quality, and a pellet with 2.5mm diameter and 3-4mm length should be used.

• The transition to fl oor feeding must be well managed. A typical well managed transition from hand feeding to spin feeding and from crumble to pellet feeding is given in Table 3.

• With fl oor feeding it is also important to pay particular attention to feed clean-up time. Birds should clear up all feed; no feed should be left in litter. Any feed left in the litter may be found by the fl ock later on leading to problems with body weight control. Check for feed in litter regularly. If feed is found in the litter feed levels may need to be amended depending on body weight.

Figure 3. Assessing crop fi ll. The chick on the left has found feed and water and has a full crop. The chick on the right has not found feed and water and has an empty crop.

Table 2. Target crop fi ll assessment guidelines.

Time of Crop Fill Check After Placement Target Crop Fill (%age of Chicks with Full Crop)

2 hours 75

8 hours >80

12 hours >85

24 hours >95

48 hours 100

Water ManagementBirds must have an easy and plentiful access to fresh, clean water from placement. Supplementary drinkers should be used during the fi rst 3 days after placement to encourage water intake (see Figure 1). During the fi rst 24 hours walking through the fl ock when checking crop fi ll and replenishing the feed on the paper will create activity in the fl ock, stimulating the chicks to feed and drink. This is particularly important where transport times have been longer.

Feed ManagementFeed management for the Rowan Ranger is the same as that for other standard Aviagen products. The key points are:

• A sieved crumble or mini-pellets should initially be provided in feeder trays (1 for every 80-100 birds) and on paper spread across at least 90% of the brooding area.

• Make feed available in mechanical feeding systems from day one and paper should not be removed from the brooding area until the birds have learned to feed from the mechanical feeders.

• Where track feeding or pans are used birds should be gradually introduced to the automated system from 8 days of age onwards. Full transfer to the automated feeding system should occur over a 2-3 day period during which time the amount of feed in the automated system should be gradually increased. During the transitional period to the automated system manual feeding should continue.

• Where spin feeders (fl oor feeding) are used, population size per spinner should be no more than 1000-1500 birds, depending on the pen shape/spinner type. Pellets should be of good physical quality, and a pellet with 2.5mm diameter and 3-4mm length should be used.

• The transition to fl oor feeding must be well managed. A typical well managed transition from hand feeding to spin feeding and from crumble to pellet feeding is given in Table 3.

• With fl oor feeding it is also important to pay particular attention to feed clean-up time. Birds should clear up all feed; no feed should be left in litter. Any feed left in the litter may be found by the fl ock later on leading to problems with body weight control. Check for feed in litter regularly. If feed is found in the litter feed levels may need to be amended depending on body weight.

Page 5: RANGER Managing the - Aviagenen.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Rowan_Range/RowanRangerMa… · 2 2016 Introduction The Rowan Ranger®, an Aviagen® specialty product for the slower-growing

2016 5

Table 3. A typical transition from hand feeding to spin feeding.

AGE/days FEED FORM FEEDING

Hand Spinner

1-13 CRUMBLE 100% -

14 CRUMBLE / PELLET 100% -

15 CRUMBLE / PELLET 100% -

16 PELLET 100% -

17 PELLET 75% 25%

18 PELLET 50% 50%

19 PELLET 25% 75%

20 PELLET - 100%

21 PELLET - 100%

• Monitor feed depth, distribution time and clean-up time routinely at several points around the house and adjust feeder height regularly with bird age and growth.

• If track feeders are used all feed should be distributed to each population within 3 minutes. If feed distribution is a problem, distribution time can be reduced by placing a supplementary feed hopper halfway around the feeder loop.

• Pan feeders provide good feed distribution if managed properly. Pan feeders must be checked regularly to ensure that all pans are receiving feed and that the lines remain charged.

Body-weight Profi lesThe Rowan male and Ranger female body-weight profi le recommendations are given below (Figures 4 and 5 and Appendix 1 at the end of the document). The Ranger female comes into production quickly, and management practices in both rear and lay must account for this. The body-weight profi les given in Figures 4 and 5 below will allow birds to achieve 5% at 23 weeks of age, but be aware the Ranger female may actually achieve 5% even earlier than this. Management for the Ranger female must be proactive and responsive if drops in production are to be avoided. Birds must be fed to achieve recommended body weights to ensure they achieve correct maturity at POL. Weekly weight gain of 20% or more between 17 and 22 weeks should be avoided as this will result in birds coming into lay early leading to a high number of small eggs.Grading is a key management strategy for the Ranger female. Because the Ranger female comes in to lay quickly a higher fl ock uniformity is necessary to ensure that early performance is optimizied and persistency of production maintained.

Figure 4. Rowan male body-weight profi le 2016.

Figure 5. Ranger Female body-weight profi le 2016.

Table 3. A typical transition from hand feeding to spin feeding.

AGE (days) FEED FORM FEEDING

Hand Spinner

1-13 CRUMBLE 100% -

14 CRUMBLE / PELLET 100% -

15 CRUMBLE / PELLET 100% -

16 PELLET 100% -

17 PELLET 75% 25%

18 PELLET 50% 50%

19 PELLET 25% 75%

20 PELLET - 100%

21 PELLET - 100%

• Monitor feed depth, distribution time and clean-up time routinely at several points around the house and adjust feeder height regularly with bird age and growth.

• If track feeders are used all feed should be distributed to each population within 3 minutes. If feed distribution is a problem, distribution time can be reduced by placing a supplementary feed hopper halfway around the feeder loop.

• Pan feeders provide good feed distribution if managed properly. Pan feeders must remain charged at all times and should be checked regularly to ensure that all pans are receiving feed and that the lines remain charged.

Body-weight Profi lesThe Rowan male and Ranger female body-weight profi le recommendations are given below (Figures 4 and 5 and Appendix 1 at the end of the document). The Ranger female comes into production quickly, and management practices in both rear and lay must account for this. The body-weight profi les given in Figures 4 and 5 below will allow birds to achieve 5% at 22 weeks of age, but be aware the Ranger may actually achieve 5% even earlier than this. Management for the Ranger female must be proactive and responsive if drops in production are to be avoided. The body-weight profi le for the Rowan male is lighter than the standard Aviagen male from 4 weeks of age. The Ranger female is a dwarf female and the body weight profi le of the Rowan male must account for this.

Figure 4. Rowan female body-weight profi le 2014.

Figure 5. Rowan male body-weight profi le 2014.

5500

00 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

Wei

ght (

g)

Age (weeks)

Figure 4.

Rowan Male 2016

Ross Male European 2015

00 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

Wei

ght (

g)

Age (weeks)

Ranger Female 2016

Ross Female European 2015

Figure 5.

Page 6: RANGER Managing the - Aviagenen.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Rowan_Range/RowanRangerMa… · 2 2016 Introduction The Rowan Ranger®, an Aviagen® specialty product for the slower-growing

6 2016

Lighting ProgramsThe Ranger female is early maturing by nature; it is also much more responsive to light stimulation than other standard Aviagen products. It is recommended that light stimulation should occur around 147 days or 21 weeks (Table 4). However, the actual age at which photo stimulation occurs will depend on the average fl ock body weight and fl ock uniformity. If the fl ock is under weight (~100g) or uneven (CV% > 10) at time of light stimulation, then the fi rst light increase should be delayed by a week.

Because the Ranger female is so responsive to light and comes into lay so quickly it is especially important that birds are maintained at the recommended body weights for age. The Ranger female must not be allowed to get over weight between 17 and 22 weeks of age as this might stimulate onset of sexual maturity even in the absence of light stimulation (this is particularly important when birds are reared in open-sided houses). If birds are overweight at this time light stimulation should be delayed by one week.

Table 4. Lighting programs for controlled environment rearing - controlled environment laying to achieve 5% at 23 weeks of age.

DAY LENGTH

for fl ocks with different CV% at 133 days (19 weeks)LIGHT INTENSITY †Age BROODING DAY LENGTH (hours)

(days) (weeks) CV 10% or less CV greater than 10%

1 23 23

80-100 lux in brooding area10-20 lux in the house

2 23 23

3 19 19

4 16 16

5 14 14

6 12 1230-60 lux (3-6 foot candles) in the brooding area 10-20

lux in the house

7 11 11

8 10 10

9 9 9

REARING DAY LENGTH(hours)

10-146 8 8 10-20 lux

(days) (weeks)LAYING DAY LENGTH

(hours)

147 21 11‡ 8

30-60 lux

154 22 12 12‡

161 23 13 13

168 24 13 13

175-depletion 25-depletion 13 13

† Average intensity within a house or pen measured at bird-head height. Light intensity should be measured in at least 9 or 10 places and include the corners, under lamps and between lamps. Ideally, the standard error should not exceed 10% of the mean.

‡ The day length may be increased abruptly in a single increment from 8 to 13 hours without adversely affecting total egg production provided the body weights are on target and the fl ock is uniform (CV ≤ 10%). An abrupt increase in day length induces a higher peak rate of lay, though with slightly poorer persistency, to that expected for a programme involving a series of increments. However, total egg production for the two types of lighting programmes will be similar.

As with all standard Aviagen products, birds in closed houses should be reared on short days of 8 hours from 10 days of age. If birds are reared in open-sided houses then they should be allowed to experience whatever the natural day length is.

Peak day length for the Rowan Ranger in lay should not exceed 13 hours of light per day. In case of excessive fl oor eggs it might be helpful to increase day length by 1 hour to 14 hours. Further increases in day length will advance the onset of adult photorefractoriness and result in inferior rates of lay at the end of the laying cycle. In open-sided houses day length will vary according to placement date and natural day length patterns. If the longest natural day length in lay is expected to exceed 13/14 hours, the combination of natural and artifi cial light should be increased to equal the expected longest natural day length. It is important that birds do not experience a reduction in day length during lay.

Lighting ProgrammesThe Ranger female is early maturing by nature; it is also much more responsive to light stimulation than other standard Aviagen products and comes into lay quickly. It is recommended that light stimulation should occur around 146 days or 21 weeks (Table 4). However, the actual age at which photo stimulation occurs will depend on the average fl ock body weight and fl ock uniformity. If the fl ock is under weight (~100g) or uneven (CV% > 10) at time of light stimulation, then the fi rst light increase should be delayed by a week.

Because the Ranger female is so responsive to light and comes into lay so quickly it is especially important that birds are maintained at the recommended body weights for age. The Ranger female must not be allowed to get over weight between 15 and 22 weeks of age as this might stimulate onset of sexual maturity even in the absence of light stimulation. This is particularly important when birds are reared in open-sided houses.

Table 4. Lighting programmes for controlled environment rearing - controlled environment laying to achieve 5% at 22 weeks of age.

DAY LENGTH

for fl ocks with different CV% at 133 days (19 weeks)LIGHT INTENSITY †Age BROODING DAY LENGTH (hours)

(days) (weeks) CV 10% or less CV greater than 10%

1 23 23

80-100 lux in brooding area10-20 lux in the house

2 23 23

3 19 19

4 16 16

5 14 14

6 12 1230-60 lux (3-6 foot candles) in the brooding area 10-20

lux in the house

7 11 11

8 10 10

9 9 9

REARING DAY LENGTH(hours)

10-146 8 8 10-20 lux

(days) (weeks)LAYING DAY LENGTH

(hours)

147 21 11‡ 8

30-60 lux

154 22 12 12‡

161 23 13 13

168 24 13 13

175-depletion 25-depletion 13 13

† Average intensity within a house or pen measured at bird-head height. Light intensity should be measured in at least 9 or 10 places and include the corners, under lamps and between lamps. Ideally, the standard error should not exceed 10% of the mean.

‡ The day length may be increased abruptly in a single increment from 8 to 13 hours without adversely affecting total egg production provided the body weights are on target and the fl ock is uniform (CV ≤ 10%). An abrupt increase in day length induces a higher peak rate of lay, though with slightly poorer persistency, to that expected for a program involving a series of increments. However, total egg production for the two types of lighting programs will be similar.

As with all standard Aviagen products, birds in closed houses should be reared on short days of 8 hours from 10 days of age. If birds are reared in open-sided houses then they should be allowed to experience whatever the natural day length is.

Peak day length for the Rowan Ranger in lay should not exceed 13 hours of light per day. In case of excessive fl oor eggs it might be helpful to increase day length by 1 hour to 14 hours. Further increases in day length will advance the onset of adult photorefractoriness and result in inferior rates of lay at the end of the laying cycle. In open-sided houses day length will vary according to placement date and natural day length patterns. If the longest natural day length in lay is expected to exceed 13/14 hours, the combination of natural and artifi cial light should be increased to equal the expected longest natural day length. It is important that birds do not experience a reduction in day length during lay.

Page 7: RANGER Managing the - Aviagenen.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Rowan_Range/RowanRangerMa… · 2 2016 Introduction The Rowan Ranger®, an Aviagen® specialty product for the slower-growing

2016 7

Laying Period (21 weeks to depletion)

Managing Stock TransferTransfer of stock to the laying facilities must be managed with appropriate care. Extra feed (approximately 50% more) should be given on the day before and the day of transfer. Feeding space must not be reduced and lighting programs and biosecurity should be synchronized between rearing and laying houses.

An assessment of crop fi ll on the day of transfer, 30 minutes after the fi rst feed and then again 24 hours later will provide an indication of whether or not birds have found feed and water after transfer (Figure 6). If crop fi ll is found to be inadequate (ideally all birds should have a full crop) the reason for this needs to be established (e.g. inadequate feeder space, feed distribution or availability of feed) and corrected as soon as possible. Continue to check crop fi ll an hour after feeding for the fi rst 3 days after transfer, to make sure all the birds are fi nding the feed and water.

Figure 6. Photo of crop fi ll after transfer.

Water should be freely available to the birds as soon as they arrive at the laying facilities. Running track or pan feeders in the dark (i.e. turn the lights off to fi ll them for the fi rst time) will aid with feed distribution.

Moving birds to the laying house should be scheduled so that all the birds have time to fi nd both feed and water in their new housing before the lights are turned off at night.

Several days after transfer it is advisable to start running the egg collection belt so the birds become accustomed to the noise and movement of the belts. This will encourage nest use when laying begins, reducing the incidence of fl oor eggs.

Feeding Into ProductionMonitoring body weight and providing appropriate feed increases into production is important with the Ranger female and the procedure for determining the pattern of feed increase from 5% production to peak is the same as that for the standard Aviagen products.

The difference in feed quantity allocated prior to fi rst egg and the target feed level given at peak (see the Rowan Ranger Performance Objectives at the end of the document for more details) allows a feed allocation schedule to be established. An example feeding program to peak for the Ranger female is given in Table 5. Up to 5% production birds should be fed according to body weight.

Table 5. Example feeding program to peak for the Ranger female.

Percent Production Feed (g) for the Ranger Female

5 100

10 98

15 101

20 104

30 110

40 116

50 122

40 135

45

50

55

60

Laying Period (21 weeks to depletion)

Managing Stock TransferTransfer of stock to the laying facilities must be managed with appropriate care. Extra feed (approximately 50% more) should be given on the day before and the day of transfer to help compensate for moving stress. Feeding space must not be reduced and lighting programmes and biosecurity should be synchronised between rearing and laying houses.

An assessment of crop fi ll on the day of transfer, 30 minutes after the fi rst feed and then again 24 hours later will provide an indication of whether or not birds have found feed and water after transfer (Figure 6). If crop fi ll is found to be inadequate (ideally all birds should have a full crop) the reason for this needs to be established (e.g. inadequate feeder space, feed distribution or availability of feed) and corrected as soon as possible. Continue to check crop fi ll an hour after feeding for the fi rst 3 days after transfer, to make sure all the birds are fi nding the feed and water.

Figure 6. Photo of crop fi ll after transfer.

Water should be freely available to the birds as soon as they arrive at the laying facilities. Running track or pan feeders in the dark (i.e. turn the lights off to fi ll them for the fi rst time) will help to reduce stress and aid with feed distribution.

Moving birds to the laying house should be scheduled so that all the birds have time to fi nd both feed and water in their new housing before the lights are turned off at night.

Several days after transfer it is advisable to start running the egg collection belt so the birds become accustomed to the noise and movement of the belts. This will encourage nest use when laying begins, reducing the incidence of fl oor eggs.

Feeding Into ProductionMonitoring body weight and providing appropriate feed increases into production is important with the Ranger female and the procedure for determining the pattern of feed increase from 5% production to peak is the same as that for the standard Aviagen products.

The difference in feed quantity allocated prior to fi rst egg and the target feed level given at peak (see the Rowan Ranger Performance Objectives at the end of the document for more details) allows a feed allocation schedule to be established. An example feeding programme to peak for the Ranger female is given in Table 5. Up to 5% production birds should be fed according to body weight.

Table 5. Example feeding programme to peak for the Ranger female.

Percent Production Feed (g) for the Ranger Female

5 100

10 105

15 110

20 115

25 120

30 125

35 130

40 135

45 137

50 139

55 142

60 145

Page 8: RANGER Managing the - Aviagenen.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Rowan_Range/RowanRangerMa… · 2 2016 Introduction The Rowan Ranger®, an Aviagen® specialty product for the slower-growing

8 2016

Actual feed amounts up to and at peak should be adjusted for each individual fl ock depending primarily on body weight, daily egg production, daily egg weight and uniformity. The following should also be taken into account;

• Feed clean up time• Energy density of the feed• Egg weight and change in egg weight• Environmental temperature

Responsive management of birds coming into production requires frequent observation and measurement (ideally daily) of the production parameters given above and this is particularly important for the Ranger female which comes into production rapidly. The feed increases given must be adjusted appropriately to support production and feed increases beyond recommended peak feed amounts may be required in high producing fl ocks. Small but frequent feed increases to the peak feed amount should be given to ensure that desired body-weight gains are achieved.

Feed Reduction After Peak Feed reduction after peak is the area of management that will have the biggest impact on persistency of lay and hatch and needs to be handled with care.

Timing and amount of feed reduction will depend on the following observations:

• Body weight and body-weight change from the start of production.• Daily egg production and the hen day production trend.• Changes in feed clean-up time.• Daily egg weight and egg-weight trend.• Egg mass trend.• Health status of the fl ock and feathering condition.• Ambient environmental temperature.• Feed composition i.e. feed texture, including energy and protein levels.• Quantity of feed (i.e. energy and protein intake) at peak.• Flock history (i.e. rearing and pre-peak performance).

Feed levels after peak should be gradually reduced to achieve 138g at depletion but the actual program of feed reduction should be carried out in response to observations and measurements of bird condition and egg production in the fi rst instance.

To enable the farm manager to monitor and establish an appropriate feed reduction program, it is important that the following characteristics are measured, recorded and graphed onto a chart:

• Daily (or weekly) body weight and body-weight change relative to the target.• Daily egg weight and egg-weight trend relative to the target.• Daily changes in feed clean-up time.

Feed allowances after peak should be adjusted to compensate for any unexpected changes in the above characteristics.

When considering feed levels after peak, seasonal temperature variations must be taken into account. A fl ock peaking in winter will fi nish production in the late spring or summer. At peak, they will have needed more feed to support the demands of egg production in cooler temperatures, but as the fl ock ages environmental temperature will increase and so birds can tolerate a more severe feed withdrawal program. A summer peaking fl ock, peaks in warmer weather and depletes in colder weather, so a less severe feed withdrawal program is required in this situation.

Separate Sex FeedingThe Rowan male is smaller than the standard Ross male. For this reason the vertical height of the female feeder feeding grills should be reduced to a maximum of 55 cm.

Male Management Male management practices for the Rowan male are similar to those for the standard Aviagen male. Good male management is as important for the productivity of the Rowan male as it is for the standard Aviagen males. The key difference for the Rowan male is the body-weight profi le details of which are given in Figure 4 and at the end of the document (Appendix 1).

Page 9: RANGER Managing the - Aviagenen.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Rowan_Range/RowanRangerMa… · 2 2016 Introduction The Rowan Ranger®, an Aviagen® specialty product for the slower-growing

2016 9

Nutrition

The Ranger female and the Rowan male do not receive any welfare treatments (beak treatment or de-clawing) and therefore good feather cover should be encouraged. The parent stock feed recommendations take account of this. To support feathering dig Meth, dig Meth + Cyst could be increased by 5-10% in the Grower diet.

Broilers

The Rowan Ranger broiler is a speciality product for the slower-growing bird market; it has a maximum growth rate of 45g per day to 56 days of age. The Rowan Ranger broiler does not need specialized management and should be managed with the same care and detail to attention as standard Aviagen broiler products. However, Rowan Ranger broiler chicks might be slightly smaller as egg size of the Ranger female is lower than that of the standard Aviagen products. Early environmental temperatures might have to be adjusted to account for this (temperatures may need to be increased by approximately 1°C depending on chick size).

Feed specifi cations for the Rowan Ranger broiler are given at the end of this document (Appendix 4).

Page 10: RANGER Managing the - Aviagenen.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Rowan_Range/RowanRangerMa… · 2 2016 Introduction The Rowan Ranger®, an Aviagen® specialty product for the slower-growing

10 2016

Conclusions

The popularity of the Rowan Ranger is likely to increase due to its slower growth rate and its recognition as a slower-growing product by several accreditation schemes (the Beter Leven in the Netherlands and Freedom Foods in the UK). Management of the broiler is the same as that for the standard Aviagen products however there are some key management differences between the Rowan Ranger parent stock and the standard Aviagen parent stock products. Understanding these differences and modifying management appropriately to account for them will ensure that the performance of the Rowan Ranger parent stock is optimized.

The key points to consider when managing Rowan Ranger parent stock are:

• The Ranger female should be reared to recommended body-weight profi les adhering to recommended nutrition specifi cations.

• Feeding into production: Ranger females come into lay quickly. It is important that increases in feed take account of this. Rowan males should be managed with care and attention. Accurate and regular monitoring of body weight and condition is the key to maintaining good fertility.

• Keep to recommended stocking densities and, in lay, ensure that suffi cient nest and feeding space is provided.

Page 11: RANGER Managing the - Aviagenen.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Rowan_Range/RowanRangerMa… · 2 2016 Introduction The Rowan Ranger®, an Aviagen® specialty product for the slower-growing

2016 11

Appendix 1. Rowan Ranger Parent Stock Performance Objectives

Table 1. Summary statistics.

Breeder: Summary of 40 weeks production

Age at depletion 62 weeks

Total Eggs (HH) 210

Hatching a (HH) 198

Chicks/female housed at 23 weeks 168

Hatchability % 85.1%

Age at 5% production 23 weeks

Peak production % (HH) 91.7

Body weight at 23 weeks 2020 g

Body weight at depletion 2460 g

Liveability rear 95-96%

Liveability lay 92%

Feed/100 Chicks (0-62 weeks) 25.9 kg

Feed/100 Hatching Eggs (0-62 weeks) 22.1 kg

Feed amounts expressed in this table do not include male feed allocations

Appendix 1. Rowan Ranger Parent Stock Performance Objectives

Table 1. Summary statistics.

Breeder: Summary of 40 weeks production

Age at depletion 62 weeks

Total Eggs (HH) 192

Hatching Eggs (HH) 181

Chicks/female housed at 23 weeks 152

Hatchability % 84.1

Age at 5% production 23 weeks

Peak production % (HH) 85.1

Body weight at 23 weeks 2230 g

Body weight at depletion 3310 g

Liveability rear 95-96%

Liveability lay 92%

Feed/100 Chicks (0-62 weeks) 29.9 kg

Feed/100 Hatching Eggs (0-62 weeks) 25.1 kg

Feed amounts expressed in this table do not include male feed allocations

Page 12: RANGER Managing the - Aviagenen.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Rowan_Range/RowanRangerMa… · 2 2016 Introduction The Rowan Ranger®, an Aviagen® specialty product for the slower-growing

12 2016

Table 2. Male and female body weights and feeding programs.

Age (days)

Age (weeks)

Female body

weight (g)

Female weekly gain

(g)

Female feed intake

(g)

Female energy intake (kcal/

bird/day)*

Male body weight (g)

Male weekly gain

(g)

Male feed intake (g)

Male energy intake (kcal/

bird/day)*day-old 0 40 ad lib 40 ad lib 22

7 1 120 80 20 56 195 155 92 3314 2 220 100 28 80 350 155 113 4021 3 340 120 34 95 515 165 128 4628 4 450 110 37 104 695 180 141 5035 5 560 110 39 110 875 180 152 5442 6 710 100 42 119 1045 170 161 5849 7 800 90 46 121 1185 140 170 6156 8 890 90 48 126 1310 125 178 6363 9 970 80 50 131 1430 120 185 6670 10 1045 75 52 136 1545 115 193 6977 11 1120 75 54 141 1645 100 200 7184 12 1195 75 56 145 1745 100 208 7491 13 1270 75 59 153 1845 100 216 7798 14 1345 75 61 160 1960 115 225 80

105 15 1420 75 64 167 2085 125 235 84112 16 1495 75 67 188 2220 135 246 88119 17 1570 75 71 199 2360 140 258 92126 18 1645 75 74 207 2505 145 272 97133 19 1720 75 78 218 2655 150 286 102140 20 1800 80 82 230 2810 155 300 107147 21 1880 80 86 241 2970 160 312 112154 22 1960 80 90 252 3130 160 324 116161 23 2020 60 95 266 3280 150 335 120168 24 2060 40 102 287 3420 140 343 123175 25 2100 40 112 314 3545 125 350 125182 26 2120 20 122 342 3655 110 355 127189 27 2140 20 128 358 3745 90 359 128196 28 2160 20 131 367 3820 75 362 129203 29 2180 20 131 367 3870 50 365 130210 30 2200 20 131 368 3910 40 367 131217 31 2210 10 131 367 3930 20 369 132224 32 2220 10 131 367 3950 20 371 132231 33 2230 10 130 364 3970 20 372 133238 34 2240 10 130 364 3990 20 374 134245 35 2250 10 130 364 4010 20 375 134252 36 2260 10 130 364 4030 20 377 134259 37 2270 10 130 364 4050 20 378 135266 38 2280 10 130 364 4070 20 379 135273 39 2290 10 129 361 4090 20 380 136280 40 2300 10 129 361 4110 20 381 136287 41 2310 10 129 361 4130 20 382 136294 42 2320 10 128 358 4150 20 383 137301 43 2330 10 128 358 4170 20 384 137308 44 2340 10 128 358 4190 20 385 138315 45 2350 10 127 356 4210 20 386 138322 46 2360 10 127 356 4230 20 387 138329 47 2370 10 126 353 4250 20 388 139336 48 2380 10 126 353 4270 20 389 139343 49 2390 10 125 350 4290 20 390 139350 50 2400 10 125 350 4310 20 391 140357 51 2405 5 124 347 4330 20 392 140364 52 2410 5 124 347 4350 20 393 140371 53 2415 5 123 344 4370 20 394 141378 54 2420 5 123 344 4390 20 395 141385 55 2425 5 122 342 4410 20 396 141392 56 2430 5 122 342 4430 20 396 142399 57 2435 5 121 339 4450 20 397 142406 58 2440 5 121 339 4470 20 398 142413 59 2445 5 120 336 4490 20 399 143420 60 2450 5 119 333 4510 20 400 143427 61 2455 5 118 330 4530 20 401 143434 62 2460 5 117 328 4550 20 402 144

* Based on 2800 kcal ME/kg. Adjustments must be made to refl ect feeding differing energy levels.

NOTESWeekly body-weight gain beyond 33 weeks (231 days) should average approximately 5-10g.Body weights are based on a feed day, 4-6 hours after feeding.Feed quantities are given as a guide. Birds should be fed the amount of feed they need to achieve the body-weight target curve.

Table 2. Male and female body weights and feed intake profi les.

Age (days)

Age (weeks)

Female body

weight (g)

Female weekly gain

(g)

Female feed intake* (g)

Female energy intake* (kcal/

bird/day)

Male body weight (g)

Male weekly gain

(g)

Male feed intake* (g)

Male energy intake* (kcal/

bird/day)0 0 38 Ad lib to 25 g 40 Ad lib7 1 120 80 Ad lib to 30 g 195 155 33 9214 2 240 120 35 98 350 155 40 11321 3 360 120 37 112 515 165 46 12828 4 480 120 43 112 695 180 50 14135 5 600 120 45 117 875 180 54 15242 6 720 120 47 122 1045 170 58 16149 7 820 100 49 127 1185 140 61 17056 8 920 100 51 133 1310 125 63 17863 9 1020 100 53 138 1430 120 66 18570 10 1120 100 55 143 1545 115 69 19377 11 1190 70 57 148 1645 100 71 20084 12 1260 70 60 156 1745 100 74 20891 13 1330 70 63 164 1845 100 77 21698 14 1400 70 66 172 1960 115 80 225105 15 1470 70 68 193 2085 125 84 235112 16 1570 100 72 202 2220 135 88 246119 17 1670 100 75 210 2360 140 92 258126 18 1770 100 78 218 2505 145 97 272133 19 1870 100 81 227 2655 150 102 286140 20 1970 100 85 238 2810 155 107 300147 21 2060 90 90 252 2970 160 112 312154 22 2150 90 95 266 3130 160 116 324161 23 2230 80 100 280 3280 150 120 335168 24 2310 80 130 364 3420 140 123 343175 25 2390 80 140 392 3545 125 125 350182 26 2460 70 145 406 3655 110 127 355189 27 2530 70 145 406 3745 90 128 359196 28 2590 60 145 406 3820 75 129 362203 29 2640 50 145 406 3870 50 130 365210 30 2670 30 144 403 3910 40 131 367217 31 2690 20 144 403 3930 20 132 369224 32 2710 20 143 400 3950 20 132 371231 33 2730 20 143 400 3970 20 133 372238 34 2750 20 142 398 3990 20 134 374245 35 2770 20 142 398 4010 20 134 375252 36 2790 20 141 395 4030 20 134 377259 37 2810 20 141 395 4050 20 135 378266 38 2830 20 140 392 4070 20 135 379273 39 2850 20 140 392 4090 20 136 380280 40 2870 20 139 389 4110 20 136 381287 41 2890 20 139 389 4130 20 136 382294 42 2910 20 138 386 4150 20 137 383301 43 2930 20 138 386 4170 20 137 384308 44 2950 20 138 386 4190 20 138 385315 45 2970 20 138 386 4210 20 138 386322 46 2990 20 138 386 4230 20 138 387329 47 3010 20 138 386 4250 20 139 388336 48 3030 20 138 386 4270 20 139 389343 49 3050 20 138 386 4290 20 139 390350 50 3070 20 138 386 4310 20 140 391357 51 3090 20 138 386 4330 20 140 392364 52 3110 20 138 386 4350 20 140 393371 53 3130 20 138 386 4370 20 141 394378 54 3150 20 138 386 4390 20 141 395385 55 3170 20 138 386 4410 20 141 396392 56 3190 20 138 386 4430 20 142 396399 57 3210 20 138 386 4450 20 142 397406 58 3230 20 138 386 4470 20 142 398413 59 3250 20 138 386 4490 20 143 399420 60 3270 20 138 386 4510 20 143 400427 61 3290 20 138 386 4530 20 143 401434 62 3310 20 138 386 4550 20 144 402

* Based on the energy levels given in the Rowan Ranger Nutrition Specifi cations. Adjustments must be made to refl ect feeding differing energy levels.

NOTESWeekly body-weight gain beyond 30 weeks (210 days) should average approximately 20g.Body weights are based on a feed day, 4-6 hours after feeding.

Page 13: RANGER Managing the - Aviagenen.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Rowan_Range/RowanRangerMa… · 2 2016 Introduction The Rowan Ranger®, an Aviagen® specialty product for the slower-growing

2016 13

Table 3. Weekly egg production.

Week of production

Age(days)

Age(weeks)

Hen housed(%)

Hen week (%)*

Eggs/bird/ week

Eggs/bird/ cum.

Hatching eggs/bird/

week**

Hatching eggs/bird/

cum.

Hatching egg

utilization weekly

Hatching egg

utilization cum.

1 161 23 5.4 5.4 0.4 0.4

2 168 24 27.7 27.8 1.9 2.3 1.1 1.1 55.8 46.7

3 175 25 56.7 56.9 4.0 6.3 2.8 3.9 70.5 61.7

4 182 26 79.7 80.2 5.6 11.9 4.8 8.7 86.5 73.4

5 189 27 87.7 88.4 6.1 18.0 5.5 14.2 89.7 78.9

6 196 28 91.2 92.1 6.4 24.4 5.9 20.1 92.2 82.4

7 203 29 91.7 92.8 6.4 30.8 6.1 26.2 94.2 84.9

8 210 30 91.7 93.0 6.4 37.2 6.1 32.2 94.7 86.6

9 217 31 90.8 92.3 6.4 43.6 6.1 38.3 95.2 87.8

10 224 32 89.9 91.6 6.3 49.9 6.0 44.3 95.7 88.8

11 231 33 89.0 90.9 6.2 56.1 6.0 50.3 96.2 89.7

12 238 34 88.2 90.1 6.2 62.3 5.9 56.2 96.2 90.3

13 245 35 87.3 89.4 6.1 68.4 5.9 62.1 96.2 90.8

14 252 36 86.4 88.7 6.0 74.4 5.8 68.0 96.5 91.3

15 259 37 85.5 87.9 6.0 80.4 5.8 73.7 96.4 91.7

16 266 38 84.6 87.2 5.9 86.3 5.7 79.4 96.4 92.0

17 273 39 83.7 86.5 5.9 92.2 5.6 85.1 96.4 92.3

18 280 40 82.8 85.7 5.8 98.0 5.6 90.7 96.4 92.5

19 287 41 81.9 85.0 5.7 103.7 5.5 96.2 96.1 92.7

20 294 42 81.0 84.2 5.7 109.4 5.4 101.6 96.1 92.9

21 301 43 80.1 83.5 5.6 115.0 5.4 107.0 96.1 93.0

22 308 44 79.2 82.7 5.5 120.6 5.3 112.3 96.0 93.2

23 315 45 78.4 82.0 5.5 126.1 5.3 117.6 96.0 93.3

24 322 46 77.5 81.2 5.4 131.5 5.2 122.8 96.0 93.4

25 329 47 76.6 80.4 5.4 136.8 5.1 128.0 96.0 93.5

26 336 48 75.7 79.7 5.3 142.1 5.1 133.0 96.0 93.6

27 343 49 74.8 78.9 5.2 147.4 5.0 138.1 96.0 93.7

28 350 50 73.9 78.1 5.2 152.5 5.0 143.0 95.9 93.8

29 357 51 73.0 77.3 5.1 157.7 4.9 147.9 95.9 93.8

30 364 52 72.1 76.6 5.0 162.7 4.8 152.8 95.4 93.9

31 371 53 71.2 75.8 5.0 167.7 4.8 157.5 95.4 93.9

32 378 54 70.3 75.0 4.9 172.6 4.7 162.2 95.4 94.0

33 385 55 69.4 74.2 4.9 177.5 4.6 166.8 95.3 94.0

34 392 56 68.6 73.4 4.8 182.3 4.6 171.4 95.3 94.0

35 399 57 67.7 72.6 4.7 187.0 4.5 175.9 95.1 94.1

36 406 58 66.8 71.8 4.7 191.7 4.4 180.3 94.8 94.1

37 413 59 65.9 71.0 4.6 196.3 4.4 184.7 94.7 94.1

38 420 60 65.0 70.2 4.5 200.8 4.3 189.0 94.7 94.1

39 427 61 64.1 69.4 4.5 205.3 4.2 193.3 94.7 94.1

40 434 62 63.2 68.6 4.4 209.8 4.2 197.5 94.7 94.1

* Hen week (%) is based on the assumption that mortality in lay is 8% with 0.2% mortality per week.** A hatching egg is considered to be an egg which is 50 grams or heavier.

Table 3. Weekly egg production.

Week of production

Age(days)

Age(weeks)

Hen housed(%)

Hen week (%)*

Eggs/bird/ week

Eggs/bird/ cum.

Hatching eggs/bird/

week**

Hatching eggs/bird/

cum.

Hatching egg

utilization weekly

Hatching egg

utilization cum.

1 161 23 5.4 5.4 0.4 0.4

2 168 24 21.1 21.2 1.5 1.9 0.8 0.8 55.8 44.5

3 175 25 50.1 50.3 3.5 5.4 2.5 3.3 70.5 61.5

4 182 26 73.1 73.6 5.1 10.5 4.4 7.7 86.5 73.7

5 189 27 81.1 81.8 5.7 16.2 5.1 12.8 89.7 79.3

6 196 28 84.6 85.5 5.9 22.1 5.5 18.3 92.2 82.8

7 203 29 85.1 86.2 6.0 28.0 5.6 23.9 94.2 85.2

8 210 30 85.1 86.3 6.0 34.0 5.6 29.5 94.7 86.9

9 217 31 84.2 85.6 5.9 39.9 5.6 35.2 95.2 88.1

10 224 32 83.3 84.9 5.8 45.7 5.6 40.7 95.7 89.1

11 231 33 82.4 84.1 5.8 51.5 5.6 46.3 96.2 89.9

12 238 34 81.6 83.4 5.7 57.2 5.5 51.8 96.2 90.5

13 245 35 80.7 82.7 5.6 62.9 5.4 57.2 96.2 91.0

14 252 36 79.8 81.9 5.6 68.4 5.4 62.6 96.5 91.5

15 259 37 78.9 81.2 5.5 74.0 5.3 67.9 96.4 91.8

16 266 38 78.0 80.4 5.5 79.4 5.3 73.2 96.4 92.2

17 273 39 77.1 79.7 5.4 84.8 5.2 78.4 96.4 92.4

18 280 40 76.2 78.9 5.3 90.2 5.1 83.5 96.4 92.7

19 287 41 75.3 78.1 5.3 95.4 5.1 88.6 96.1 92.8

20 294 42 74.4 77.4 5.2 100.6 5.0 93.6 96.1 93.0

21 301 43 73.5 76.6 5.1 105.8 4.9 98.6 96.1 93.2

22 308 44 72.7 75.8 5.1 110.9 4.9 103.4 96.0 93.3

23 315 45 71.8 75.1 5.0 115.9 4.8 108.3 96.0 93.4

24 322 46 70.9 74.3 5.0 120.9 4.8 113.0 96.0 93.5

25 329 47 70.0 73.5 4.9 125.8 4.7 117.7 96.0 93.6

26 336 48 69.1 72.7 4.8 130.6 4.6 122.4 96.0 93.7

27 343 49 68.2 71.9 4.8 135.4 4.6 127.0 96.0 93.8

28 350 50 67.3 71.2 4.7 140.1 4.5 131.5 95.9 93.9

29 357 51 66.4 70.4 4.6 144.7 4.5 135.9 95.9 93.9

30 364 52 65.5 69.6 4.6 149.3 4.4 140.3 95.4 94.0

31 371 53 64.6 68.8 4.5 153.8 4.3 144.6 95.4 94.0

32 378 54 63.7 68.0 4.5 158.3 4.3 148.9 95.4 94.0

33 385 55 62.9 67.2 4.4 162.7 4.2 153.1 95.3 94.1

34 392 56 62.0 66.3 4.3 167.0 4.1 157.2 95.3 94.1

35 399 57 61.1 65.5 4.3 171.3 4.1 161.3 95.1 94.1

36 406 58 60.2 64.7 4.2 175.5 4.0 165.3 94.8 94.2

37 413 59 59.3 63.9 4.2 179.7 3.9 169.2 94.7 94.2

38 420 60 58.4 63.1 4.1 183.8 3.9 173.1 94.7 94.2

39 427 61 57.5 62.2 4.0 187.8 3.8 176.9 94.7 94.2

40 434 62 56.6 61.4 4.0 191.8 3.8 180.6 94.7 94.2

* Hen week (%) is based on the assumption that mortality in lay is 8% with 0.2% mortality per week.** A hatching egg is considered to be an egg which is 50 grams or heavier.

Page 14: RANGER Managing the - Aviagenen.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Rowan_Range/RowanRangerMa… · 2 2016 Introduction The Rowan Ranger®, an Aviagen® specialty product for the slower-growing

14 2016

Table 4. Weekly hatchability and chick production.

Week of production

Age(days)

Age(weeks)

Hatch all eggs (%)*

Cum. hatchability (%)

Chicks/week hen housed

Cum. chicks hen housed

1 161 23

2 168 24 70.5 70.5 0.8 0.8

3 175 25 77.7 75.7 2.2 2.9

4 182 26 80.5 78.4 3.9 6.8

5 189 27 83.2 80.2 4.6 11.4

6 196 28 85.3 81.7 5.0 16.4

7 203 29 87.1 83.0 5.3 21.7

8 210 30 88.2 84.0 5.4 27.1

9 217 31 89.1 84.8 5.4 32.5

10 224 32 89.4 85.4 5.4 37.8

11 231 33 89.9 85.9 5.4 43.2

12 238 34 90.3 86.4 5.4 48.6

13 245 35 90.1 86.7 5.3 53.9

14 252 36 89.9 87.0 5.2 59.1

15 259 37 89.6 87.2 5.2 64.3

16 266 38 89.3 87.4 5.1 69.4

17 273 39 89.0 87.5 5.0 74.4

18 280 40 88.5 87.5 4.9 79.4

19 287 41 88.0 87.6 4.8 84.2

20 294 42 87.5 87.6 4.8 89.0

21 301 43 87.0 87.5 4.7 93.7

22 308 44 86.5 87.5 4.6 98.3

23 315 45 86.0 87.4 4.5 102.8

24 322 46 85.5 87.3 4.5 107.3

25 329 47 85.0 87.2 4.4 111.6

26 336 48 84.5 87.1 4.3 115.9

27 343 49 84.0 87.0 4.2 120.2

28 350 50 83.5 86.9 4.1 124.3

29 357 51 83.0 86.8 4.1 128.4

30 364 52 82.5 86.6 4.0 132.3

31 371 53 82.0 86.5 3.9 136.2

32 378 54 81.5 86.4 3.8 140.1

33 385 55 81.0 86.2 3.8 143.8

34 392 56 80.5 86.1 3.7 147.5

35 399 57 80.0 85.9 3.6 151.1

36 406 58 79.5 85.7 3.5 154.6

37 413 59 79.0 85.6 3.5 158.1

38 420 60 78.5 85.4 3.4 161.5

39 427 61 78.0 85.3 3.3 164.8

40 434 62 77.5 85.1 3.2 168.0

* Hatchability is based on an average egg age of 3 days. Hatchability will drop by 0.5% per day of storage between 7 and 11 days.

Table 4. Weekly hatchability and chick production.

Week of production

Age(days)

Age(weeks)

Hatch all eggs (%)*

Cum. hatchability (%)

Chicks/week hen housed

Cum. chicks hen housed

1 161 23

2 168 24 61.8 61.8 0.5 0.5

3 175 25 70.8 68.5 1.7 2.3

4 182 26 78.2 74.1 3.5 5.7

5 189 27 81.6 77.1 4.2 9.9

6 196 28 84.2 79.2 4.6 14.5

7 203 29 86.3 80.9 4.8 19.3

8 210 30 87.6 82.2 4.9 24.3

9 217 31 88.6 83.2 5.0 29.2

10 224 32 88.9 84.0 5.0 34.2

11 231 33 89.5 84.6 5.0 39.2

12 238 34 89.9 85.2 4.9 44.1

13 245 35 89.6 85.6 4.9 49.0

14 252 36 89.4 85.9 4.8 53.8

15 259 37 89.1 86.2 4.7 58.5

16 266 38 88.8 86.4 4.7 63.2

17 273 39 88.4 86.5 4.6 67.8

18 280 40 87.9 86.6 4.5 72.3

19 287 41 87.3 86.6 4.4 76.8

20 294 42 86.8 86.6 4.3 81.1

21 301 43 86.2 86.6 4.3 85.4

22 308 44 85.7 86.6 4.2 89.6

23 315 45 85.1 86.5 4.1 93.7

24 322 46 84.6 86.4 4.0 97.7

25 329 47 84.0 86.3 4.0 101.6

26 336 48 83.5 86.2 3.9 105.5

27 343 49 82.9 86.1 3.8 109.3

28 350 50 82.3 86.0 3.7 113.0

29 357 51 81.8 85.8 3.6 116.7

30 364 52 81.1 85.7 3.6 120.2

31 371 53 80.6 85.5 3.5 123.7

32 378 54 80.0 85.4 3.4 127.1

33 385 55 79.4 85.2 3.3 130.4

34 392 56 78.8 85.0 3.3 133.7

35 399 57 78.2 84.9 3.2 136.9

36 406 58 77.6 84.7 3.1 140.0

37 413 59 77.0 84.5 3.0 143.0

38 420 60 76.4 84.3 3.0 146.0

39 427 61 75.8 84.2 2.9 148.9

40 434 62 75.3 84.0 2.8 151.7

* Hatchability is based on an average egg age of 3 days. Hatchability will drop by 0.5% per day of storage between 7 and 11 days.

Page 15: RANGER Managing the - Aviagenen.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Rowan_Range/RowanRangerMa… · 2 2016 Introduction The Rowan Ranger®, an Aviagen® specialty product for the slower-growing

2016 15

Table 5. Weekly egg weight and egg mass.

Week of production

Age(days)

Age(weeks)

Hen week (%) Egg weight (g) Egg mass*

1 161 23 5.4 45.70 2.5

2 168 24 27.8 47.70 13.2

3 175 25 56.9 49.50 28.2

4 182 26 80.2 51.25 41.1

5 189 27 88.4 52.02 46.0

6 196 28 92.1 52.77 48.6

7 203 29 92.8 53.50 49.7

8 210 30 93.0 54.20 50.4

9 217 31 92.3 54.89 50.7

10 224 32 91.6 55.55 50.9

11 231 33 90.9 56.19 51.1

12 238 34 90.1 56.81 51.2

13 245 35 89.4 57.41 51.3

14 252 36 88.7 57.99 51.4

15 259 37 87.9 58.55 51.5

16 266 38 87.2 59.08 51.5

17 273 39 86.5 59.59 51.5

18 280 40 85.7 60.08 51.5

19 287 41 85.0 60.55 51.5

20 294 42 84.2 61.00 51.4

21 301 43 83.5 61.42 51.3

22 308 44 82.7 61.82 51.1

23 315 45 82.0 62.20 51.0

24 322 46 81.2 62.56 50.8

25 329 47 80.4 62.90 50.6

26 336 48 79.7 63.22 50.4

27 343 49 78.9 63.51 50.1

28 350 50 78.1 63.79 49.8

29 357 51 77.3 64.04 49.5

30 364 52 76.6 64.27 49.2

31 371 53 75.8 64.48 48.9

32 378 54 75.0 64.66 48.5

33 385 55 74.2 64.83 48.1

34 392 56 73.4 64.97 47.7

35 399 57 72.6 65.09 47.3

36 406 58 71.8 65.19 46.8

37 413 59 71.0 65.27 46.3

38 420 60 70.2 65.32 45.8

39 427 61 69.4 65.41 45.4

40 434 62 68.6 65.49 44.9

Table 5. Weekly egg weight and egg mass.

Week of production

Age(days)

Age(weeks)

Hen week (%) Egg weight (g) Egg mass*

1 161 23 5.4 45.70 2.5

2 168 24 27.8 47.70 13.2

3 175 25 56.9 49.50 28.2

4 182 26 80.2 51.25 41.1

5 189 27 88.4 52.02 46.0

6 196 28 92.1 52.77 48.6

7 203 29 92.8 53.50 49.7

8 210 30 93.0 54.20 50.4

9 217 31 92.3 54.89 50.7

10 224 32 91.6 55.55 50.9

11 231 33 90.9 56.19 51.1

12 238 34 90.1 56.81 51.2

13 245 35 89.4 57.41 51.3

14 252 36 88.7 57.99 51.4

15 259 37 87.9 58.55 51.5

16 266 38 87.2 59.08 51.5

17 273 39 86.5 59.59 51.5

18 280 40 85.7 60.08 51.5

19 287 41 85.0 60.55 51.5

20 294 42 84.2 61.00 51.4

21 301 43 83.5 61.42 51.3

22 308 44 82.7 61.82 51.1

23 315 45 82.0 62.20 51.0

24 322 46 81.2 62.56 50.8

25 329 47 80.4 62.90 50.6

26 336 48 79.7 63.22 50.4

27 343 49 78.9 63.51 50.1

28 350 50 78.1 63.79 49.8

29 357 51 77.3 64.04 49.5

30 364 52 76.6 64.27 49.2

31 371 53 75.8 64.48 48.9

32 378 54 75.0 64.66 48.5

33 385 55 74.2 64.83 48.1

34 392 56 73.4 64.97 47.7

35 399 57 72.6 65.09 47.3

36 406 58 71.8 65.19 46.8

37 413 59 71.0 65.27 46.3

38 420 60 70.2 65.32 45.8

39 427 61 69.4 65.41 45.4

40 434 62 68.6 65.49 44.9

Table 5. Weekly egg weight and egg mass.

Week of production

Age(days)

Age(weeks)

Hen week (%) Egg weight (g) Egg mass*

1 161 23 5.4 47.50 2.6

2 168 24 21.2 49.50 10.5

3 175 25 50.3 50.70 25.5

4 182 26 73.6 52.20 38.4

5 189 27 81.8 53.50 43.7

6 196 28 85.5 54.70 46.8

7 203 29 86.2 55.80 48.1

8 210 30 86.3 56.70 48.9

9 217 31 85.6 57.50 49.2

10 224 32 84.9 58.30 49.5

11 231 33 84.1 58.90 49.6

12 238 34 83.4 59.50 49.6

13 245 35 82.7 60.10 49.7

14 252 36 81.9 60.60 49.6

15 259 37 81.2 61.00 49.5

16 266 38 80.4 61.40 49.4

17 273 39 79.7 61.80 49.2

18 280 40 78.9 62.20 49.1

19 287 41 78.1 62.50 48.8

20 294 42 77.4 62.90 48.7

21 301 43 76.6 63.20 48.4

22 308 44 75.8 63.60 48.2

23 315 45 75.1 63.93 48.0

24 322 46 74.3 64.30 47.8

25 329 47 73.5 64.60 47.5

26 336 48 72.7 65.00 47.3

27 343 49 71.9 65.30 47.0

28 350 50 71.2 65.73 46.8

29 357 51 70.4 66.00 46.4

30 364 52 69.6 66.40 46.2

31 371 53 68.8 66.70 45.9

32 378 54 68.0 67.00 45.5

33 385 55 67.2 67.30 45.2

34 392 56 66.3 67.60 44.8

35 399 57 65.5 67.90 44.5

36 406 58 64.7 68.10 44.1

37 413 59 63.9 68.30 43.6

38 420 60 63.1 68.50 43.2

39 427 61 62.2 68.80 42.8

40 434 62 61.4 69.00 42.4

Hen week (%) x Egg weight (g)

100* Egg mass =

Page 16: RANGER Managing the - Aviagenen.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Rowan_Range/RowanRangerMa… · 2 2016 Introduction The Rowan Ranger®, an Aviagen® specialty product for the slower-growing

16 2016

Appendix 2. Rowan Ranger Parent Stock Nutrition Specifi cations

Table 1. Female parent stock nutrition specifi cations (four stage rearing programme).

STARTER 1 STARTER 2 GROWER PRE-BREEDER BREEDER 1 BREEDER 2 ** BREEDER 3 **

Age Fed days 0-21 22-42 43-105106 days to 5%

productionFrom 5%

productionAfter 245 days After 351 days

Energy per kg kcal 2800 2800 2600 2700 2800 2800 2800

MJ 11.7 11.7 10.9 11.7 11.7 11.7 11.7

Energy per lb kcal 1270 1270 1179 1225 1270 1270 1270

AMINO ACIDS* TOTAL DIGEST1 TOTAL DIGEST1 TOTAL DIGEST1 TOTAL DIGEST1 TOTAL DIGEST1 TOTAL DIGEST1 TOTAL DIGEST1

Lysine % 1.06 0.95 0.74 0.67 0.58 0.52 0.58 0.52 0.67 0.60 0.62 0.56 0.58 0.52

Methionine + Cystine % 0.84 0.74 0.67 0.59 0.59 0.52 0.58 0.51 0.67 0.59 0.65 0.57 0.59 0.54

Methionine % 0.51 0.46 0.41 0.37 0.36 0.33 0.35 0.32 0.41 0.37 0.40 0.36 0.36 0.35

Threonine % 0.75 0.66 0.60 0.53 0.50 0.44 0.47 0.41 0.55 0.49 0.53 0.47 0.51 0.47

Valine % 0.80 0.71 0.70 0.63 0.49 0.44 0.51 0.45 0.63 0.56 0.60 0.53 0.57 0.51

Iso-leucine % 0.70 0.62 0.62 0.55 0.45 0.40 0.47 0.41 0.56 0.50 0.54 0.48 0.51 0.45

Arginine % 1.17 1.05 0.93 0.83 0.71 0.64 0.74 0.67 0.88 0.79 0.86 0.77 0.80 0.72

Tryptophan % 0.19 0.16 0.18 0.15 0.14 0.12 0.15 0.13 0.16 0.14 0.15 0.13 0.14 0.12

Leucine % 1.23 1.11 0.93 0.83 0.77 0.69 0.8 0.72 1.04 0.94 1.00 0.90 0.96 0.86

Crude Protein % 19.00 17.00 13.00 - 14.00 14.00 15.00 14.00

MINERALS*

Calcium % 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.20 3.00 3.20 3.40

Available Phosphorus % 0.45 0.45 0.42 0.35 0.35 0.33 0.32

Sodium % 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.23

Chloride % 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.23

Potassium % 0.40 0.90 0.40 0.90 0.40 0.90 0.60 0.90 0.60 0.90 0.60 0.90 0.60 0.90

ADDED TRACE MINERALS PER KG

Copper mg 16 16 16 16 10 10 10

Iodine mg 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 2.00 2.00 2.00

Iron mg 40 40 40 40 50 50 50

Manganese mg 120 120 120 120 120 120 120

Selenium mg 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30

Zinc mg 110 110 110 110 110 110 110

ADDED VITAMINSPER KG

Wheatbasedfeed

Maizebasedfeed

Wheatbasedfeed

Maizebasedfeed

Wheatbasedfeed

Maizebasedfeed

Wheatbasedfeed

Maizebasedfeed

Wheatbasedfeed

Maizebasedfeed

Wheatbasedfeed

Maizebasedfeed

Wheatbasedfeed

Maizebasedfeed

Vitamin A IU 11000 10000 11000 10000 11000 10000 11000 10000 12000 11000 12000 11000 12000 11000

Vitamin D3 IU 3500 3500 3500 3500 3500 3500 3500 3500 3500 3500 3500 3500 3500 3500

Vitamin E IU 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Vitamin K (Menadione) mg 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5

Thiamine (B1) mg 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

Ribofl avin (B2) mg 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 12 12 12 12 12 12

Nicotinic Acid mg 30 35 30 35 30 35 30 35 50 55 50 55 50 55

Pantothenic Acid mg 13 15 13 15 13 15 13 15 13 15 13 15 13 15

Pyridoxine (B6) mg 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 5 4 5 4 5 4

Biotin mg 0.20 0.15 0.20 0.15 0.20 0.15 0.20 0.15 0.30 0.25 0.30 0.25 0.30 0.25

Folic Acid mg 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00

Vitamin B12 mg 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03

MINIMUM SPECIFICATION

Choline per kg mg 1400 1400 1300 1200 1200 1050 1050

Linoleic Acid % 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.25 1.25

Digest1 = Digestible

* Energy base value. Nutrients should be factored accordingly when feeding differing energy values.

**A Breeder 2 and 3 can be useful to help control egg size and improve shell quality.

NOTESThese feed specifi cations should be used as a guide. They may require adjustment for local conditions, legislation and markets.

Digest1 = Digestible* Energy base value. Nutrients should be factored accordingly when feeding differing energy values.**A Breeder 2 and 3 can be useful to help control egg size and improve shell quality. NOTESThese feed specifi cations should be used as a guide. They may require adjustment for local conditions, legislation and markets.

Appendix 2. Rowan Ranger Parent Stock Nutrition Specifi cations

Table 1. Female parent stock nutrition specifi cations (four stage rearing program).

Page 17: RANGER Managing the - Aviagenen.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Rowan_Range/RowanRangerMa… · 2 2016 Introduction The Rowan Ranger®, an Aviagen® specialty product for the slower-growing

2016 17

Appendix 2. Rowan Ranger Parent Stock Nutrition Specifi cations

Table 1. Female parent stock nutrition specifi cations (four stage rearing programme).

STARTER 1 STARTER 2 GROWER PRE-BREEDER BREEDER 1 BREEDER 2 ** BREEDER 3 **

Age Fed days 0-21 22-42 43-105106 days to 5%

productionFrom 5%

productionAfter 245 days After 351 days

Energy per kg kcal 2800 2800 2600 2800 2800 2800 2800

MJ 11.7 11.7 10.9 11.7 11.7 11.7 11.7

Energy per lb kcal 1270 1270 1179 1225 1270 1270 1270

AMINO ACIDS* TOTAL DIGEST1 TOTAL DIGEST1 TOTAL DIGEST1 TOTAL DIGEST1 TOTAL DIGEST1 TOTAL DIGEST1 TOTAL DIGEST1

Lysine % 1.06 0.95 0.74 0.67 0.58 0.52 0.58 0.52 0.67 0.60 0.62 0.56 0.58 0.52

Methionine + Cystine % 0.84 0.74 0.67 0.59 0.59 0.52 0.58 0.51 0.67 0.59 0.65 0.57 0.59 0.54

Methionine % 0.51 0.46 0.41 0.37 0.36 0.33 0.35 0.32 0.41 0.37 0.40 0.36 0.36 0.35

Threonine % 0.75 0.66 0.60 0.53 0.50 0.44 0.47 0.41 0.55 0.49 0.53 0.47 0.51 0.47

Valine % 0.80 0.71 0.70 0.63 0.49 0.44 0.51 0.45 0.63 0.56 0.60 0.53 0.57 0.51

Iso-leucine % 0.70 0.62 0.62 0.55 0.45 0.40 0.47 0.41 0.56 0.50 0.54 0.48 0.51 0.45

Arginine % 1.17 1.05 0.93 0.83 0.71 0.64 0.74 0.67 0.88 0.79 0.86 0.77 0.80 0.72

Tryptophan % 0.19 0.16 0.18 0.15 0.14 0.12 0.15 0.13 0.16 0.14 0.15 0.13 0.14 0.12

Leucine % 1.23 1.11 0.93 0.83 0.77 0.69 0.8 0.72 1.04 0.94 1.00 0.90 0.96 0.86

Crude Protein % 19.00 17.00 13.00 - 14.00 14.00 15.00 14.00 13.00

MINERALS*

Calcium % 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.20 3.00 3.20 3.40

Available Phosphorus % 0.45 0.45 0.42 0.35 0.35 0.33 0.32

Sodium % 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.23

Chloride % 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.23 0.18 0.23

Potassium % 0.40 0.90 0.40 0.90 0.40 0.90 0.60 0.90 0.60 0.90 0.60 0.90 0.60 0.90

ADDED TRACE MINERALS PER KG

Copper mg 16 16 16 16 10 10 10

Iodine mg 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 2.00 2.00 2.00

Iron mg 40 40 40 40 50 50 50

Manganese mg 120 120 120 120 120 120 120

Selenium mg 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30

Zinc mg 110 110 110 110 110 110 110

ADDED VITAMINSPER KG

Wheatbasedfeed

Maizebasedfeed

Wheatbasedfeed

Maizebasedfeed

Wheatbasedfeed

Maizebasedfeed

Wheatbasedfeed

Maizebasedfeed

Wheatbasedfeed

Maizebasedfeed

Wheatbasedfeed

Maizebasedfeed

Wheatbasedfeed

Maizebasedfeed

Vitamin A IU 11000 10000 11000 10000 11000 10000 11000 10000 12000 11000 12000 11000 12000 11000

Vitamin D3 IU 3500 3500 3500 3500 3500 3500 3500 3500 3500 3500 3500 3500 3500 3500

Vitamin E IU 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Vitamin K (Menadione) mg 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5

Thiamine (B1) mg 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

Ribofl avin (B2) mg 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 12 12 12 12 12 12

Nicotinic Acid mg 30 35 30 35 30 35 30 35 50 55 50 55 50 55

Pantothenic Acid mg 13 15 13 15 13 15 13 15 13 15 13 15 13 15

Pyridoxine (B6) mg 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 5 4 5 4 5 4

Biotin mg 0.20 0.15 0.20 0.15 0.20 0.15 0.20 0.15 0.30 0.25 0.30 0.25 0.30 0.25

Folic Acid mg 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00

Vitamin B12 mg 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03

MINIMUM SPECIFICATION

Choline per kg mg 1400 1400 1300 1200 1200 1050 1050

Linoleic Acid % 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.25 1.25

Digest1 = Digestible

* Energy base value. Nutrients should be factored accordingly when feeding differing energy values.

**A Breeder 2 and 3 can be useful to help control egg size and improve shell quality.

NOTESThese feed specifi cations should be used as a guide. They may require adjustment for local conditions, legislation and markets.

Table 2. Female parent stock nutrient allocations at peak.

Nutrient Nutrient Allocation at Peak

Energy (kcal/bird/day) 406

DIGESTIBLE AMINO ACIDS mg/bird/day

Lysine 870

Methionine + Cystine 856

Methionine 537

Threonine 711

Valine 812

Iso-leucine 725

Arginine 1146

Tryptophan 203

Leucine 1363

MINERALS mg/bird/day

Calcium 4350

Available Phosphorus 508

NOTESThese feed specifi cations should be used as a guide. They may require adjustment for local conditions, legislation and markets. These nutrient allocations at peak are based on feeding 145g of a 2800 kcal ME/kg diet.

Table 2. Female parent stock nutrient allocations at peak.Table 1. Female parent stock nutrition specifi cations (four stage rearing program) Continued.

Page 18: RANGER Managing the - Aviagenen.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Rowan_Range/RowanRangerMa… · 2 2016 Introduction The Rowan Ranger®, an Aviagen® specialty product for the slower-growing

18 2016

Table 3. Male parent stock nutrition specifi cations.

Table 3. Male parent stock nutrition specifi cations.

Feed allocation will be determined by male body weight and condition. The male diet should be introduced when birds are moved to the laying house or at light stimulation.

Energy per kg kcal 2700

MJ 11.3

Energy per lb kcal 1225

AMINO ACIDS* TOTAL DIGEST1

Lysine % 0.49 0.44

Methionine + Cystine % 0.48 0.42

Methionine % 0.31 0.28

Threonine % 0.38 0.33

Valine % 0.42 0.37

Iso-leucine % 0.39 0.34

Arginine % 0.58 0.52

Tryptophan % 0.09 0.08

Leucine % 0.58 0.52

Crude Protein % 11.50

MINERALS*

Calcium % 0.70

Avail. Phosphorus % 0.35

Sodium % 0.18 - 0.23

Chloride % 0.18 - 0.23

Potassium % 0.60 - 0.90

ADDED TRACE MINERALS PER KG

Copper mg 10

Iodine mg 2

Iron mg 50

Manganese mg 120

Zinc mg 110

Selenium mg 0.30

ADDED VITAMINS PER KG Wheat based feed Maize based feed

Vitamin A IU 12000 11000

Vitamin D3 IU 3500 3500

Vitamin E IU 100 100

Vitamin K (Menadione) mg 5 5

Thiamine (B1) mg 3 3

Ribofl avin (B2) mg 12 12

Nicotinic Acid mg 50 55

Pantothenic Acid mg 13 15

Pyridoxine (B6) mg 5 4

Biotin mg 0.30 0.25

Folic Acid mg 2.00 2.00

Vitamin B12 mg 0.03 0.03

MINIMUM SPECIFICATION

Choline per kg mg 1000

Linoleic Acid % 1.00

Digest1 = Digestible

* Energy base value. Nutrients should be factored accordingly when feeding differing energy values.

NOTESThese feed specifi cations should be used as a guide. They may require adjustment for local conditions, legislation and markets.

Page 19: RANGER Managing the - Aviagenen.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Rowan_Range/RowanRangerMa… · 2 2016 Introduction The Rowan Ranger®, an Aviagen® specialty product for the slower-growing

19

Appendix 3. Rowan Ranger Broiler Performance Objectives

Table 1. As hatched broiler performance.

Day Weight (g) 1 Daily gain (g) Av. Daily gain/week (g) Daily intake (g) Cum. intake (g) 2 FCR3

0 381 50 12 35 0.7042 63 12 23 59 0.9383 76 13 20 79 1.0404 91 15 20 100 1.0965 107 16 22 121 1.1316 125 18 23 145 1.1577 144 19 15 25 170 1.1778 166 21 28 198 1.1949 188 23 30 228 1.210

10 213 24 33 261 1.22411 239 26 35 296 1.23912 267 28 38 334 1.25313 297 30 41 376 1.26714 328 31 26 44 420 1.28115 361 33 48 468 1.29516 396 35 51 519 1.31017 432 36 54 573 1.32518 471 38 58 631 1.34019 510 40 61 692 1.35520 551 41 64 756 1.37121 594 43 38 68 824 1.38722 638 44 71 895 1.40323 684 45 75 970 1.41924 730 47 78 1048 1.43625 778 48 82 1130 1.45226 827 49 85 1215 1.46927 877 50 89 1304 1.48628 929 51 48 92 1396 1.50329 981 52 95 1491 1.52130 1034 53 99 1590 1.53831 1087 54 102 1691 1.55632 1142 54 105 1796 1.57333 1197 55 108 1904 1.59134 1252 56 111 2015 1.60935 1308 56 54 114 2129 1.62836 1365 56 117 2246 1.64637 1421 57 120 2366 1.66438 1478 57 122 2488 1.68339 1536 57 125 2613 1.70140 1593 57 127 2740 1.72041 1650 57 130 2870 1.73942 1708 57 57 132 3002 1.75843 1765 57 134 3136 1.77744 1822 57 136 3272 1.79645 1879 57 138 3410 1.81546 1935 57 140 3550 1.83447 1991 56 142 3691 1.85448 2047 56 143 3835 1.87349 2103 55 56 145 3979 1.89350 2158 55 146 4126 1.91251 2212 54 147 4273 1.93252 2266 54 149 4422 1.95153 2319 53 150 4571 1.97154 2372 53 151 4722 1.99155 2424 52 152 4874 2.01156 2475 51 53 152 5026 2.03057 2526 51 153 5179 2.05058 2576 50 154 5333 2.07059 2625 49 154 5487 2.09060 2673 48 155 5641 2.11061 2721 48 155 5796 2.13062 2767 47 155 5951 2.15063 2813 46 48 155 6106 2.171

1. On-farm body weight (i.e. feed present in intestinal tract)2. Feed consumption per living bird3. FCR includes initial body weight at placement and does not account for mortality

Page 20: RANGER Managing the - Aviagenen.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Rowan_Range/RowanRangerMa… · 2 2016 Introduction The Rowan Ranger®, an Aviagen® specialty product for the slower-growing

20 2016

Table 2. Male broiler performance.

Day Weight (g) 1 Daily gain (g) Av. Daily gain/week (g) Daily intake (g) Cum. intake (g) 2 FCR3

0 381 50 12 19 0.3802 63 12 20 39 0.6173 76 14 20 59 0.7684 91 15 20 79 0.8665 108 16 21 100 0.9336 126 18 23 123 0.9827 145 20 15 25 148 1.0198 166 21 27 175 1.0499 189 23 29 204 1.076

10 214 25 32 236 1.10111 241 27 35 271 1.12412 269 29 38 309 1.14613 300 30 41 350 1.16814 332 32 27 45 395 1.19015 366 34 48 444 1.21116 402 36 52 496 1.23317 440 38 56 552 1.25418 480 40 60 612 1.27619 521 41 64 676 1.29720 564 43 68 744 1.31921 609 45 40 72 816 1.34022 656 47 76 893 1.36223 704 48 81 974 1.38324 754 50 85 1058 1.40425 805 51 89 1147 1.42526 858 53 93 1241 1.44627 912 54 97 1338 1.46728 967 55 51 101 1439 1.48829 1024 57 105 1545 1.50930 1081 58 109 1654 1.53031 1140 59 113 1768 1.55032 1200 60 117 1885 1.57133 1260 61 121 2006 1.59134 1322 61 124 2130 1.61135 1384 62 60 128 2258 1.63236 1447 63 131 2389 1.65237 1510 63 134 2523 1.67138 1574 64 137 2661 1.69139 1638 64 140 2801 1.71140 1702 64 143 2944 1.73041 1766 65 146 3090 1.74942 1831 65 64 148 3238 1.76843 1896 65 150 3388 1.78744 1960 65 152 3540 1.80645 2025 64 154 3694 1.82446 2089 64 156 3850 1.84347 2153 64 157 4008 1.86148 2217 64 159 4166 1.87949 2280 63 64 160 4326 1.89750 2343 63 161 4487 1.91551 2405 62 162 4649 1.93352 2467 62 162 4811 1.95053 2528 61 163 4974 1.96854 2588 60 163 5137 1.98555 2648 60 163 5301 2.00256 2706 59 61 163 5464 2.01957 2764 58 163 5627 2.03658 2821 57 163 5790 2.05259 2877 56 163 5953 2.06960 2933 55 162 6115 2.08561 2987 54 161 6276 2.10162 3040 53 161 6437 2.11763 3093 52 55 160 6597 2.133

1. On-farm body weight (i.e. feed present in intestinal tract)2. Feed consumption per living bird3. FCR includes initial body weight at placement and does not account for mortality

Page 21: RANGER Managing the - Aviagenen.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Rowan_Range/RowanRangerMa… · 2 2016 Introduction The Rowan Ranger®, an Aviagen® specialty product for the slower-growing

2016 21

Table 3. Female broiler performance.

Day Weight (g) 1 Daily gain (g) Av. Daily gain/week (g) Daily intake (g) Cum. intake (g) 2 FCR3

0 381 50 12 52 1.0292 62 12 27 79 1.2593 76 13 21 99 1.3124 91 15 21 120 1.3255 107 16 22 142 1.3306 124 18 24 166 1.3337 144 19 15 26 192 1.3368 165 21 29 221 1.3399 187 23 31 252 1.344

10 211 24 33 285 1.34811 237 26 36 321 1.35312 265 27 39 360 1.35913 294 29 41 401 1.36514 324 31 26 44 445 1.37215 356 32 47 491 1.37916 390 34 49 541 1.38717 425 35 52 593 1.39518 462 37 55 648 1.40419 499 38 58 706 1.41420 539 39 61 766 1.42321 579 40 36 63 830 1.43422 620 42 66 896 1.44423 663 43 69 965 1.45524 707 44 72 1037 1.46725 751 45 75 111 1.47926 797 45 77 1188 1.49227 843 46 80 1268 1.50528 890 47 44 83 1351 1.51829 938 48 85 1436 1.53230 986 48 88 1524 1.54631 1034 49 90 1615 1.56132 1084 49 93 1708 1.57633 1133 49 96 1803 1.59234 1183 50 98 1901 1.60735 1233 50 49 100 2002 1.62436 1283 50 103 2104 1.64037 1333 50 105 2209 1.65738 1383 50 107 2317 1.67539 1434 50 110 2426 1.69240 1484 50 112 2538 1.71041 1534 50 114 2652 1.72942 1584 50 50 116 2768 1.74843 1634 50 118 2886 1.76744 1683 49 120 3006 1.78645 1732 49 122 3128 1.80646 1781 49 124 3252 1.82647 1830 48 126 3378 1.84648 1878 48 127 3505 1.86749 1925 48 49 129 3634 1.88850 1972 47 131 3765 1.90951 2019 47 132 3898 1.93052 2065 46 134 4032 1.95253 2111 46 136 4167 1.97454 2156 45 137 4304 1.99655 2200 44 138 4443 2.01956 2244 44 46 140 4583 2.04257 2288 43 141 4724 2.06558 2330 43 142 4866 2.08859 2372 42 144 5010 2.11260 2414 41 145 5154 2.13561 2455 41 146 5300 2.15962 2495 40 147 5447 2.18463 2534 39 41 148 5595 2.208

1. On-farm body weight (i.e. feed present in intestinal tract)2. Feed consumption per living bird3. FCR includes initial body weight at placement and does not account for mortality

Page 22: RANGER Managing the - Aviagenen.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Rowan_Range/RowanRangerMa… · 2 2016 Introduction The Rowan Ranger®, an Aviagen® specialty product for the slower-growing

22 2016

Table 4. Processing performance.

The following tables indicate how yields of the major portions change with increasing live weight in each sex. Two types of processing are described: eviscerated yield is broken down into breast meat, thigh and drumstick to represent a portioning operation and into breast meat and leg meat to represent a deboning operation.

Defi nition of Processing Terms:Eviscerated %: eviscerated carcass (without neck, abdominal fat and internal organs) as a percentage of live weight.Breast %: breast meat (without skin and bone) as a percentage of live weight.Thigh/Drumstick %: whole thigh/drumstick (with skin and bone) as a percentage of live weight.Leg Meat %: sum of deboned thigh (without skin) and deboned drumstick (without skin) as a percentage of live weight.

NOTEThese fi gures represent dry yield. They do not include any moisture retained during chilling or processing. Carcass component yields will vary among processing plants depending on, for example, type of equipment used and the exact portion(s) being produced.

Rowan Ranger male - Portion Rowan Ranger male - Debone

Live weight

Live weight

(kg) Breast % Thigh % Drumstick % Eviscerated % (kg) Leg meat % Breast% Total %

1.6 18.33 12.05 10.04 65.52 1.6 15.91 18.14 34.05

1.8 18.63 12.24 10.07 65.98 1.8 15.97 18.44 34.41

2.0 18.92 12.44 10.10 66.44 2.0 16.01 18.72 34.73

2.2 19.21 12.63 10.15 66.90 2.2 16.03 18.99 35.02

2.4 19.50 12.81 10.19 67.36 2.4 16.06 19.23 35.29

2.6 19.79 13.00 10.24 67.83 2.6 16.08 19.46 35.54

2.8 20.08 13.16 10.29 68.30 2.8 16.10 19.67 35.77

Rowan Ranger female - Portion Rowan Ranger female - Debone

Live weight

Live weight

(kg) Breast% Thigh% Drumstick% Eviscerated % (kg) Leg meat % Breast% Total %

1.4 18.65 12.31 9.60 70.65 1.4 14.90 18.65 33.55

1.6 18.95 12.47 9.57 71.07 1.6 14.96 18.95 33.91

1.8 19.22 12.63 9.54 71.49 1.8 15.02 19.22 34.24

2.0 19.49 12.80 9.51 71.91 2.0 15.09 19.49 34.58

2.2 19.73 12.96 9.49 72.30 2.2 15.15 19.73 34.88

2.4 19.94 13.09 9.46 72.69 2.4 15.20 19.94 35.14

2.6 20.15 13.22 9.44 73.05 2.6 15.27 20.15 35.42

Rowan Ranger male - Portion Rowan Ranger male - Debone

Live weight

Live weight

(kg) Breast% Thigh% Drumstick% Eviscerated % (kg) Leg meat % Breast % Total %

1.6 18.14 12.19 10.16 70.66 1.6 15.86 18.33 34.19

1.8 18.44 12.35 10.16 71.04 1.8 15.98 18.63 34.61

2.0 18.72 12.51 10.16 71.41 2.0 16.07 18.92 34.99

2.2 18.99 12.66 10.17 71.77 2.2 16.15 19.21 35.36

2.4 19.23 12.79 10.17 72.12 2.4 16.29 19.50 35.80

2.6 19.46 12.91 10.17 72.46 2.6 16.39 19.79 36.18

2.8 19.67 13.02 10.18 72.79 2.8 16.52 20.08 36.60

Rowan Ranger female - Portion Rowan Ranger female - Debone

Live weight

Live weight

(kg) Breast% Thigh% Drumstick% Eviscerated % (kg) Leg meat % Breast% Total %

1.4 18.65 12.31 9.60 70.65 1.4 14.90 18.65 33.55

1.6 18.95 12.47 9.57 71.07 1.6 14.96 18.95 33.91

1.8 19.22 12.63 9.54 71.49 1.8 15.02 19.22 34.24

2.0 19.49 12.80 9.51 71.91 2.0 15.09 19.49 34.58

2.2 19.73 12.96 9.49 72.30 2.2 15.15 19.73 34.88

2.4 19.94 13.09 9.46 72.69 2.4 15.20 19.94 35.14

2.6 20.15 13.22 9.44 73.05 2.6 15.27 20.15 35.42

Rowan Ranger male - Portion Rowan Ranger male - Debone

Live weight

Live weight

(kg) Breast% Thigh% Drumstick% Eviscerated % (kg) Leg meat % Breast% Total %

1.6 18.14 12.19 10.16 70.66 1.6 15.91 18.14 34.05

1.8 18.44 12.35 10.16 71.04 1.8 15.97 18.44 34.41

2.0 18.72 12.51 10.16 71.41 2.0 16.01 18.72 34.73

2.2 18.99 12.66 10.17 71.77 2.2 16.03 18.99 35.02

2.4 19.23 12.79 10.17 72.12 2.4 16.06 19.23 35.29

2.6 19.46 12.91 10.17 72.46 2.6 16.08 19.46 35.54

2.8 19.67 13.02 10.18 72.79 2.8 16.10 19.67 35.77

3.0 19.86 13.13 10.18 73.11 3.0 16.13 19.86 35.99

Rowan Ranger female - Portion Rowan Ranger female - Debone

Live weight

Live weight

(kg) Breast% Thigh% Drumstick% Eviscerated % (kg) Leg meat % Breast % Total %

1.4 18.65 12.31 9.60 70.65 1.6 14.91 19.15 34.06

1.6 18.95 12.47 9.57 71.07 1.8 15.03 19.42 34.45

1.8 19.22 12.63 9.54 71.49 2.0 15.15 19.69 34.84

2.0 19.49 12.80 9.51 71.91 2.2 15.27 19.96 35.23

2.2 19.73 12.96 9.49 72.30 2.4 15.43 20.22 35.66

2.4 19.94 13.09 9.46 72.69 2.6 15.58 20.50 36.08

2.6 20.15 13.22 9.44 73.05 2.8 15.78 20.77 36.51

Rowan Ranger male - Portion Rowan Ranger male - Debone

Live weight

Live weight

(kg) Breast% Thigh% Drumstick% Eviscerated % (kg) Leg meat % Breast% Total %

1.6 18.14 12.19 10.16 70.66 1.6 15.91 18.14 34.05

1.8 18.44 12.35 10.16 71.04 1.8 15.97 18.44 34.41

2.0 18.72 12.51 10.16 71.41 2.0 16.01 18.72 34.73

2.2 18.99 12.66 10.17 71.77 2.2 16.03 18.99 35.02

2.4 19.23 12.79 10.17 72.12 2.4 16.06 19.23 35.29

2.6 19.46 12.91 10.17 72.46 2.6 16.08 19.46 35.54

2.8 19.67 13.02 10.18 72.79 2.8 16.10 19.67 35.77

3.0 19.86 13.13 10.18 73.11 3.0 16.13 19.86 35.99

Rowan Ranger female - Portion Rowan Ranger female - Debone

Live weight

Live weight

(kg) Breast % Thigh % Drumstick % Eviscerated % (kg) Leg meat % Breast% Total %

1.6 19.15 12.34 9.62 65.90 1.4 14.90 18.65 33.55

1.8 19.42 12.55 9.63 66.40 1.6 14.96 18.95 33.91

2.0 19.69 12.76 9.64 66.90 1.8 15.02 19.22 34.24

2.2 19.96 12.98 9.65 67.40 2.0 15.09 19.49 34.58

2.4 20.22 13.22 9.68 67.89 2.2 15.15 19.73 34.88

2.6 20.50 13.42 9.70 68.38 2.4 15.20 19.94 35.14

2.8 20.77 13.63 9.73 68.88 2.6 15.27 20.15 35.42

Page 23: RANGER Managing the - Aviagenen.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Rowan_Range/RowanRangerMa… · 2 2016 Introduction The Rowan Ranger®, an Aviagen® specialty product for the slower-growing

2016 23

Appendix 4. Rowan Ranger Broiler Nutrition Specifi cations

Starter Grower 1 Grower 2 Finisher 1 Finisher 2

Days 0-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-MARKET

Metabolizable energy kcal 3000 3100 3150 3200 3200

MJ 12.55 12.97 13.18 13.39 13.39

Amino Acids TOTAL DIGEST1 TOTAL DIGEST1 TOTAL DIGEST1 TOTAL DIGEST1 TOTAL DIGEST1

Lysine % 1.40 1.25 1.26 1.12 1.17 1.04 1.10 0.98 1.06 0.94

Meth + Cystine % 1.05 0.93 0.97 0.85 0.91 0.80 0.87 0.76 0.83 0.73

Methionine % 0.54 0.50 0.50 0.46 0.47 0.44 0.45 0.41 0.43 0.39

Threonine % 0.95 0.84 0.85 0.75 0.79 0.70 0.75 0.66 0.72 0.63

Valine % 1.08 0.94 0.98 0.85 0.92 0.80 0.88 0.76 0.84 0.73

Iso-leucine % 0.95 0.84 0.87 0.76 0.82 0.72 0.77 0.68 0.74 0.65

Arginine % 1.43 1.29 1.29 1.16 1.21 1.09 1.14 1.03 1.10 0.99

Tryptophan % 0.22 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.19 0.17 0.18 0.16 0.17 0.15

Leucine % 1.54 1.38 1.38 1.23 1.29 1.14 1.21 1.08 1.16 1.03

Achieved Crude Protein2 % 22.0 20.0 19.0 18.0 17.5

Minerals

Calcium % 0.96 0.84 0.78 0.72 0.68

Available Phosphorus % 0.48 0.42 0.39 0.36 0.34

Magnesium % 0.05 - 0.30 0.05 - 0.30 0.05 - 0.30 0.05 - 0.30 0.05 - 0.30

Sodium % 0.16 - 0.23 0.16 - 0.23 0.16 - 0.20 0.16 - 0.20 0.16 - 0.20

Chloride % 0.16 - 0.23 0.16 - 0.23 0.16 - 0.23 0.16 - 0.23 0.16 - 0.23

Potassium % 0.40 - 1.00 0.40 - 0.95 0.40 - 0.90 0.40 - 0.85 0.40 - 0.80

Added trace minerals

Copper mg 16 16 16 16 16

Iodine mg 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25

Iron mg 20 20 20 20 20

Manganese mg 120 120 120 120 120

Selenium mg 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30

Zinc mg 110 110 110 110 110

Added Vitamins Wheatbasedfeed

Maizebased feed

Wheatbasedfeed

Maizebased feed

Wheatbasedfeed

Maizebased feed

Wheatbasedfeed

Maizebased feed

Wheatbasedfeed

Maizebased feed

Vitamin A iu 13000 12000 11000 10000 10000 9000 10000 9000 10000 9000

Vitamin D3 iu 5000 5000 4500 4500 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000

Vitamin E iu 80 80 65 65 55 55 55 55 55 55

Vitamin K (Menadione) mg 3.2 3.2 3.0 3.0 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2

Thiamin (B1) mg 3.2 3.2 2.5 2.5 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2

Ribofl avin (B2) mg 8.6 8.6 6.5 6.5 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4

Niacin mg 60 65 55 60 40 45 40 45 40 45

Pantothenic Acid mg 17 20 15 18 13 15 13 15 13 15

Pyridoxine (B6) mg 5.4 4.3 4.3 3.2 3.2 2.2 3.2 2.2 3.2 2.2

Biotin mg 0.30 0.22 0.25 0.18 0.20 0.15 0.20 0.15 0.20 0.15

Folic Acid mg 2.20 2.20 1.90 1.90 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.60

Vitamin B12 mg 0.017 0.017 0.017 0.017 0.011 0.011 0.011 0.011 0.011 0.011

Minimum specifi cations

Choline per kg mg 1700 1600 1500 1500 1400

Linoleic Acid % 1.25 1.20 1.00 1.00 1.00

Digest1 = Digestible

Achieved Crude Protein2 is not a “dietary crude protein minimum constraint”. The formulation priority is to meet all the recommended minimum essential amino acid levels. These achieved crude protein levels are not requirements per se, but instead are levels which will likely occur when formulating to the specifi ed essential amino acid minimums while using commercially available synthetic amino acids. The achieved crude protein levels actually observed will vary depending on the feed ingredients being utilized and their associated nutritional composition.

NOTES These feed specifi cations should be used as a guide. They require adjustment for local conditions and markets. A withdrawal feed should be fed to meet local legislation requirements for drug withdrawal times. This can be formulated to the same standards as the fi nal feed listed above.

Page 24: RANGER Managing the - Aviagenen.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Rowan_Range/RowanRangerMa… · 2 2016 Introduction The Rowan Ranger®, an Aviagen® specialty product for the slower-growing

24 2016

Every attempt has been made to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the information presented. However, Aviagen accepts no liability for the consequences of using the information for the management of chickens.

For further information on the management of Rowan Ranger stock, please contact your local representative.

Aviagen and the Aviagen logo, the Rowan Range and the Rowan Range logo, and the Rowan Ranger and the Rowan Ranger logo are registered trademarks of Aviagen in the US and other countries.All other trademarks or brands are registered by their respective owners.

© 2016 Aviagen.

RANGEROWAN®

RANGEROWAN®


Recommended