+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Rapid taxonomic classification of complex consortia of environmental rDNA using a microarray.

Rapid taxonomic classification of complex consortia of environmental rDNA using a microarray.

Date post: 11-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: ciqala
View: 26 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Rapid taxonomic classification of complex consortia of environmental rDNA using a microarray. What bugs are in my sample?. CEB - ESD - LBNL Todd DeSantis, Sonya Murray, Jordan Moberg, Gary Andersen Carol Stone (DSTL, U.K.). The ponderings of a toddler. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
26
Rapid taxonomic classification of complex Rapid taxonomic classification of complex consortia of environmental rDNA using a consortia of environmental rDNA using a microarray. microarray. CEB - ESD - LBNL Todd DeSantis, Sonya Murray, Jordan Moberg, Gary Andersen Carol Stone (DSTL, U.K.) What bugs are in my What bugs are in my sample? sample?
Transcript
Page 1: Rapid taxonomic classification of complex consortia of environmental rDNA using a microarray.

Rapid taxonomic classification of complex consortia Rapid taxonomic classification of complex consortia of environmental rDNA using a microarray.of environmental rDNA using a microarray.

CEB - ESD - LBNLTodd DeSantis, Sonya Murray, Jordan Moberg, Gary Andersen

Carol Stone (DSTL, U.K.)

What bugs are in my What bugs are in my sample?sample?

Page 2: Rapid taxonomic classification of complex consortia of environmental rDNA using a microarray.

The ponderings of a toddlerThe ponderings of a toddler

Why must Mom confiscate my “Hello Kitty”

blanket on laundry day?

Will the swings be wet at the park?How will this

sausage impact the diversity in my

lower G.I. bacterial

community?

Will I inhale any archaeal

microorganisms when I visit the

hot springs?Gianna DeSantis

Page 3: Rapid taxonomic classification of complex consortia of environmental rDNA using a microarray.

• Every discarded water sample, geological core, or spent air filter is lost data.

• But who wants to do all the work?– Culture? Anaerobes? non-cultivable? Safety?– Analysis of nucleic acids isolated from environment

• Must classify or sort heterogeneous nucleic acids into bins.– Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms (RFLP)– Single Stranded Conformation Polymorphisms (SSCP)– Temp/Denat Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (T/DGGE)– Sequencing

» Provides taxonomic nomenclature » estimates the relative abundance » Need to create, clone, & process hundreds of samples

• Can we create a simple, comprehensive (quantitative?) microbial test?

Page 4: Rapid taxonomic classification of complex consortia of environmental rDNA using a microarray.

Project OverviewProject Overview• Goal

– Create a single microarray capable of detecting and categorizing the bacteria in a complex sample.

• Approach– GeneChip targeted at

16S rDNA sequence variations to distinguish taxa.

Page 5: Rapid taxonomic classification of complex consortia of environmental rDNA using a microarray.

The The RibosomeRibosome

rDNA

rRNA (functional molecule)

LSU

SSU16s or 18s

Page 6: Rapid taxonomic classification of complex consortia of environmental rDNA using a microarray.

• Foundations:– Maintain the largest

16S gene library (~83,000).

– Cluster sequences into taxa (~8,000).

– Create algorithm for picking probes for each taxa (~500,000).

Page 7: Rapid taxonomic classification of complex consortia of environmental rDNA using a microarray.

cctagcatgCattctgcatacctagcatgGattctgcata

MATCHMISMATCH

Build custom Affymetrix GeneChip

• Massive parallelism – up to 2 million probes upon a 1.28 cm2 glass surface.• Identification of multiple species in a mixed population•Pair each probe with a “mismatch” control probe.

Page 8: Rapid taxonomic classification of complex consortia of environmental rDNA using a microarray.

General General ProtocolProtocol

AirSoil

FecesBloodWater

rRNA

gDNA

Universal 16S rDNA

PCR

Contains probes adhered to glass surface in grid

pattern.

Page 9: Rapid taxonomic classification of complex consortia of environmental rDNA using a microarray.

Overview of Sample Preparation using a Modified Affymetrix Protocol

18 µ

18 µ

ACGGTCGA

ACGGTCGA

ACGGTCGA

ACGGTCGA

ACGGTCGA

Hybridize

PCR Amplify DNA

Fractionate DNA

End-label with biotin

Extract Genomic DNA

Page 10: Rapid taxonomic classification of complex consortia of environmental rDNA using a microarray.

Progress in Miniaturization

GeneChip 3000 scanner 16S Microarray

Page 11: Rapid taxonomic classification of complex consortia of environmental rDNA using a microarray.

500,000 Probe 16S array(DOE 16S Chip)

Page 12: Rapid taxonomic classification of complex consortia of environmental rDNA using a microarray.

Parameter Frankia Clostridium Positive fraction 1.00 0.64Average difference 3720 625

Frankia sp. str. G48

PM MM

Clostridium butyricum

Page 13: Rapid taxonomic classification of complex consortia of environmental rDNA using a microarray.

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

BASIS

EPA

(127 OTUs displayed)

High confidence bacterial species detectionwith 500K probe microarray: - Greater microbial diversity in EPA samples

Page 14: Rapid taxonomic classification of complex consortia of environmental rDNA using a microarray.

...CGTAAAGCTCTGTCTTTGGGGAAGATAATGACGGTACCCAAGGAGGAAGCCACGGCTAACT... C. perf. str.CPN50

................................................................... C. perf. resistant

................................................................... Clostridium sp. AB&J

................................................................... clone p-4636-2Wa2

................................................................... C. perf. A

................................................................... C. perf rrnA

................................................................... C. perf rrnE

.................................T................................. C. perf rrnD

................................................................... C. perf rrnC

................................................................... C. perf rrnB

................................................................... C. perf rrnF

................................................................... C. perf rrnG

................................................................... C. perf str.13a

................................................................... C. perf str.13b

................................................................... C. perf rrnH

................................................................... C. perf rrnI

................................................................... C. perf rrnJ

................................................................... clone OI1612

................................................................... C. perf. B

................................................................... Swine manure 37-3

................................................................... Swine manure 37-4

TAAAGCTCTGTCTTTGGGGAAGATA tacccaaggaggaagccacggctaa AAAGCTCTGTCTTTGGGGAAGATAA AAGCTCTGTCTTTGGGGAAGATAAT AGCTCTGTCTTTGGGGAAGATAATG

Bacteria

CFB

Cyan

Proteo

Gram +

High G+C

Bacil-Strep

Clostridium

C.BOTULINUM_SUBGROUP

C.THERMOBUTYRICUM_SUBGROUP

C.BARATI_SUBGROUP

C.CADAVERIS

C.ALGIDICARNIS

C.PERFRINGENS

C.AURANTIBUTYRICUM

C. BUTYRICUM

16S rDNA

Probes 5 - 8

5 6 7 8

27 1492

420 469

Ave Diff =1891

C. perfringens probe set identified in EPA sample 22 (N.Y.C., Spring)

Page 15: Rapid taxonomic classification of complex consortia of environmental rDNA using a microarray.

-- ARCHAEA (1)---- EURYARCHAEOTA (1.1)------ METHANOMICROBACTERIA_AND_RELATIVES (1.1.3)-------- HALOPHILIC_ARCHAEA (1.1.3.4)---------- NTC.AMYLOLYTICUS_SUBGROUP (1.1.3.4.6)

(Natronococcus) 1.1.3.4.6.32228 OTU 6 seqs prokMSA_id:649 AB012049 str. MSP1 prokMSA_id:650 AB012052 str. MSP11 prokMSA_id:653 AB012055 str. MSP16prokMSA_id:654 AB012056 str. MSP17prokMSA_id:655 AB012057 str. MSP22 prokMSA_id:656 AB012058 str. MSP23

Developing Microarray Experiment Browser

Page 16: Rapid taxonomic classification of complex consortia of environmental rDNA using a microarray.

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

2280

2030

0000

0.001

_st

2280

2040

1000

0.006

_st

2280

2040

3000

0.066

_st

2280

2040

7000

0.007

_st

2280

2050

3000

0.009

_st

2280

2050

5000

0.013

_st

2280

2050

6000

0.007

_st

2280

2050

8000

0.015

_st

2280

2080

2000

0.001

_st

2280

2080

4000

0.031

_st

2280

2090

4010

0.017

_st

2280

2090

4030

0.008

_st

2280

2090

4080

0.030

_st

2280

2090

4120

0.011

_st

2280

2090

5010

0.004

_st

2280

2090

5010

0.026

_st

2280

2090

5040

0.013

_st

2280

2100

4000

0.013

_st

2280

2100

6000

0.009

_st

2280

2110

0000

0.063

_st

2280

2140

3000

0.005

_st

Beta protebacteria taxa

Sign

al (a

.u.)

434 -proteobacteria taxa

2250306000000.030_st Acidobacterium capsulatum+2280208040000.041_st Bordetella pertussis+2280209041300.025_st Acidovorax avenae+2280210040000.040_st Burkholderia graminis+2280210060000.007_st Burkholderia cepacia+2280211000000.071_st Oxalobacter formigenes+2280299000000.001_st Ralstonia solanacearum+2280308990000.001_st Stenotrophomonas maltophilia+

Clean Filter-extracted-amplified-fragmented-labeled-hybridized

Example of detection with the -proteobacteria Sub-division

Many of the detected taxa also contain "Environmental clone” members.

What’s in a “blank”

sample?

Page 17: Rapid taxonomic classification of complex consortia of environmental rDNA using a microarray.

Testing the effects of variation in hybridization temperature

All 3 conditions allowed spikes to be detected.

48deg hybridization permitted the least additional taxa to be reported.

Create synthetic community of 16S amplicons.A. capsulatumY. pestisC. jejuniS. aureusB. anthracisS. typhiB. melitensisR. prowazekiiB. subtilisE. coli

Separately culture, gDNA-extract, and PCR-amplify.Combine PCR products.

Page 18: Rapid taxonomic classification of complex consortia of environmental rDNA using a microarray.

Testing the effects of variation in hybridization temperature

All 3 conditions allowed spikes to be detected.

48deg hybridization permitted the least additional taxa to be reported.

Probe Set 45 hyb 48 hyb 50 hyb Members2130500000000.006 _st+ + + RB25 (Nitrospina)2131100000000.015 _st+ MB1228 (Nitrospina)2131200000000.011 _st+ RB40 (Nitrospina)2250306000000.030 _st+ + + Acidobacterium capsulatum2280106990000.001 _st+ + + Brucella melitensis2280108010199.001 _st+ + + Roseobacter litoralis 2280108050500.003 _st+ + + Rickettsia prowazekii2280110990000.001 _st+ Sphingomonas yanoikuyae2280205060000.005 _st+ Zoogloea DhA-352280209041400.009 _st+ + + Aquaspirillum metamorphum2280320040000.039 _st+ + + Shewanella woodyi2280323990000.001 _st+ + + Vibrio vulnificus2280324020000.008 _st+ + + Aeromonas hydrophila2280327040200.012 _st+ Erwinia amylovora2280327050000.007 _st+ + + Klebsiella oxytoca2280327070000.005 _st + Pantoea agglomerans2280327090000.001 _st+ + Erwinia carotovora 2280327100000.011 _st+ Serratia marcescens2280327120000.010 _st + Serratia proteamaculans2280327140500.003 _st+ + + Yersinia pestis2280327990000.002 _st+ + + E. coli, S. typhi2280503040000.010 _st+ + + Campylobacter jejuni2300107040000.027 _st+ + + R18 (Actinobacteria)2300710090000.020 _st+ + Bacillus firmus2300711050000.020 _st+ + + Bacillus subtilis2300712010000.013 _st+ + + Staphylococcus aureus2300712040000.004 _st+ + + Bacillus anthracis2300717030000.017 _st+ + + Col7 (Lactobacilli)2300721990000.001 _st+ + + Streptococcus

Page 19: Rapid taxonomic classification of complex consortia of environmental rDNA using a microarray.

C. jejuni probe sets 45 deg C 48 deg C 50 deg C

2280503040000.010d_st 3015 2219 1927

2280503040000.010c_st 3011 2303 2126

2280503040000.010b_st 3166 2397 2548

2280503040000.010_st 3162 2320 2291

mean: 3088 2309 2223

standard deviation: 87 73 263

coefficient of variation: 0.03 0.03 0.12

Reproducibility

Probes for C. jejuni tiled in 4 areas

Page 20: Rapid taxonomic classification of complex consortia of environmental rDNA using a microarray.

Columbus, OH

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2100

2000

0000

0.01

0_st

2130

5000

0000

0.00

6_st

2150

1031

0000

0.08

1_st

2210

2050

0000

0.00

1_st

2250

3060

0000

0.03

0_st

2280

1060

9000

0.02

0_st

2280

1061

0000

0.00

7_st

2280

1069

9000

0.00

1_st

2280

1070

5000

0.01

6_st

2280

1080

1019

9.00

1_st

2280

1080

1020

2.01

1_st

2280

1100

6000

0.00

6_st

2280

1101

2000

0.01

4_st

2280

1101

2000

0.02

0_st

2280

1101

3000

0.01

5_st

2280

1109

9000

0.00

1_st

2280

2010

9000

0.01

3_st

2280

2040

3000

0.07

6_st

2280

2050

6000

0.00

5_st

2280

2050

7000

0.01

4_st

2280

2090

4140

0.00

9_st

2280

2090

4990

0.00

2_st

2280

2090

5040

0.01

5_st

2280

3080

5000

0.00

2_st

2280

3110

1050

0.00

3_st

2280

3139

9000

0.00

2_st

2280

3240

2000

0.00

8_st

2280

3270

4020

0.01

2_st

2280

3270

5000

0.00

7_st

2280

3270

7000

0.00

5_st

2280

3271

0000

0.01

1_st

2280

3279

9000

0.00

2_st

2300

1070

1000

0.00

9_st

2300

1080

1990

0.00

1_st

2300

1080

3090

0.02

4_st

2300

1090

1010

0.01

2_st

2300

1090

1030

1.00

3_st

2300

1090

1030

5.02

8_st

2300

1090

1040

1.00

3_st

2300

1090

1050

1.05

1_st

2300

1090

1060

1.02

3_st

2300

1090

1060

2.02

3_st

2300

1090

1060

3.00

2_st

2300

1119

9000

0.00

1_st

2300

1119

9000

0.00

2_st

2300

1130

1010

0.07

6_st

2300

1130

2060

0.00

6_st

2300

1130

2990

0.00

2_st

2300

1130

6040

0.02

9_st

2300

4050

7000

0.00

4_st

2300

7040

1000

0.00

4_st

2300

7100

1000

0.00

5_st

2300

7100

1000

0.02

7_st

2300

7100

8000

0.00

4_st

2300

7100

9000

0.01

2_st

2300

7100

9000

0.02

0_st

2300

7101

1000

0.00

1_st

2300

7110

5000

0.02

0_st

2300

7120

4000

0.00

4_st

2300

7130

6000

0.00

1_st

2300

7170

3000

0.01

7_st

2300

7170

4000

0.01

4_st

2300

9020

8000

0.01

0_st

2300

9021

1040

0.02

1_st

2300

9021

1050

0.00

5_st

wk18 wk19

Page 21: Rapid taxonomic classification of complex consortia of environmental rDNA using a microarray.

Quantitative Considerations-Spike environmental samples with defined amplicons.- Calibrate- Pearson’s corr coefficient was significant (df=18).- 95% confidence intervals plotted.

Figure 2 - Calibration Plot

y = 0.9207x + 10.504R = 0.974

9

11

13

15

17

19

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

log2 Concentration (pM)

log 2 H

ybSc

ore

Spike-in rDNA

Environmental rDNA

95% Confidence Limits

Spike-in Regression

Page 22: Rapid taxonomic classification of complex consortia of environmental rDNA using a microarray.

Environmental community is measured with confidence intervals.

Figure 3 - Concentration of Environmental SSU Amplicons

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

Clostridium thermobutyricumStreptococcus anginosus

Bacillus racemilacticusPseudomonas sp.

symbiont of Solemya velumClostridium limosum+

Eurotiales (Aspergillus+)Bartonella+

Staphylococcus delphini+Vibrio parahaemolyticus+

Pasteurella sp.Heterotextus alpinus

StreptomycesStaphylococcus cohnii+

Propionibacterium lymphophilumLeucostoma persoonii

Taxa

rDNA Concentration (pM)

Conf Interval: Conc(t(RSE)/b)(1/m+1/n+((Y-y)2) / (b2(n-1)sx2))

b = slope from regressionY = mean of 6 replicate measurementsm = number of repeat measurements = 6y = mean of the HybScores for the 20 points used for calibrationt = critical value obtained from t-table for 18 d.f. for 95% = 1.734RSE = residual standard error of calibration points = 0.56sx = standard deviation of the conc. for the 20 points used for calibration

Page 23: Rapid taxonomic classification of complex consortia of environmental rDNA using a microarray.

Current projectsCurrent projects

- Netherlands soil bioremediation tracking

- BioWatch – DHS metropolitan air microbe survey

- G.I. community comparison- Root-soil interface- Does polymerase brand affect perceived

community?

Page 24: Rapid taxonomic classification of complex consortia of environmental rDNA using a microarray.

Takara PCR

Applied Bio PCR

PCR Enzyme Comparison

Biowatch gDNA

Biowatch gDNA

+

+

neg

neg

Takara (gDNA pool)Total ng DNA in PCR bands: 4437.58Total ng DNA in PCR reactions (+smear): 7266.95Ratio of bands:total DNA 0.61

Applied Bio. (gDNA pool)Total ng DNA in PCR bands: 546.73Total ng DNA in PCR reactions (+smear): 8149.28Ratio of bands:total DNA 0.07

ng in 5uL ng in 45uLLane 1 Band from biowatch pool (Tak) 76.3 686.9Lane 2 Band from biowatch pool (Tak) 59.3 533.8Lane 3 Band from biowatch pool (Tak) 80.5 724.9Lane 4 Band from biowatch pool (Tak) 99.2 892.8Lane 5 Band from biowatch pool (Tak) 104.3 938.5Lane 6 Band from pos control 1pg (Tak) 73.4 660.7Lane 1 Band+Smear from biowarch pool (Tak) 151.7 1365.3Lane 2 Band+Smear from biowarch pool (Tak) 146.8 1321.5Lane 3 Band+Smear from biowarch pool (Tak) 182.0 1638.4Lane 4 Band+Smear from biowarch pool (Tak) 161.3 1451.6Lane 5 Band+Smear from biowarch pool (Tak) 165.6 1490.1Lane 6 Band+Smear from pos control 1pg (Tak) 86.0 774.1Lane 9 Band from biowatch pool (AB) 14.1 127.0Lane 10 Band from biowatch pool (AB) 13.3 119.3Lane 11 Band from biowatch pool (AB) 7.8 70.4Lane 12 Band from biowatch pool (AB) 11.4 102.3Lane 13 Band from biowatch pool (AB) 14.2 127.7Lane 14 Band from pos control 1pg (AB) 8.3 74.4Lane 9 Band+Smear from biowarch pool (AB) 160.6 1445.1Lane 10 Band+Smear from biowarch pool (AB) 184.8 1663.6Lane 11 Band+Smear from biowarch pool (AB) 185.0 1665.2Lane 12 Band+Smear from biowarch pool (AB) 185.5 1669.9Lane 13 Band+Smear from biowarch pool (AB) 189.5 1705.5Lane 14 Band+Smear from pos control 1pg (AB) 132.3 1190.3

Page 25: Rapid taxonomic classification of complex consortia of environmental rDNA using a microarray.

SummarySummaryThe rDNA microarray is able to rapidly quantify and

taxonomically classify complex consortia of rDNA amplicons.

You can collect data on over 8,000 taxa simultaneously.

Page 26: Rapid taxonomic classification of complex consortia of environmental rDNA using a microarray.

AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements• Gary Andersen – Group Leader • Carol Stone – UK sample collection, hybridization • Sonya Murray – sample preparation, hybridizations,

manuscript composition• Jordan Moberg – sample preparation, sample tracking

database, parameter optimization.


Recommended