+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility...

Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility...

Date post: 14-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: della-richardson
View: 218 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
56
Rational Choice
Transcript
Page 1: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

Rational Choice

Page 2: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

CHOICE

1. Scarcity (income constraint)

2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

Page 3: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

ECONOMIC RATIONALITY

The principal behavioral postulate is that a decision-maker chooses its most preferred alternative from those available to it.

The available choices constitute the choice set.

How is the most preferred bundle in the choice set located/found?

Page 4: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

RATIONAL CONSTRAINED CHOICE

Affordablebundles

x1

x2

More preferredbundles

Page 5: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

RATIONAL CONSTRAINED CHOICE

x1

x2

x1*

x2*

Page 6: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

RATIONAL CONSTRAINED CHOICE

x1

x2

x1*

x2*

(x1*,x2*) is the mostpreferred affordablebundle.

E

Page 7: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

RATIONAL CONSTRAINED CHOICE

MRS=x2/x1 = p1/p2

Slope of the indifference curve

Slope of the budget constraint

Individual’s willingness to trade

Society’s willingness to trade

At Equilibrium E

Page 8: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

RATIONAL CONSTRAINED CHOICE

The most preferred affordable bundle is called the consumer’s ORDINARY DEMAND at the given prices and income.

Ordinary demands will be denoted byx1*(p1,p2,m) and x2*(p1,p2,m).

Page 9: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

RATIONAL CONSTRAINED CHOICE

x1

x2

x1*

x2*

The slope of the indifference curve at (x1*,x2*) equals the slope of the budgetconstraint.

Page 10: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

RATIONAL CONSTRAINED CHOICE

(x1*,x2*) satisfies two conditions: (i) the budget is exhausted, i.e.

p1x1* + p2x2* = m; and (ii) the slope of the budget constraint,

(-) p1/p2, and the slope of the indifference curve containing (x1*,x2*) are equal at (x1*,x2*).

Page 11: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

COMPUTING DEMAND

How can this information be used to locate (x1*,x2*) for given p1, p2 and m?

Two ways to do this

1. Use Lagrange multiplier method

2. Find MRS and substitute into the Budget Constraint

Page 12: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

COMPUTING DEMAND Lagrange Multiplier Method

Suppose that the consumer has Cobb-Douglas preferences

and a budget constraint given by

mxpxp 2211

aaxxxxU 12121 ),(

Page 13: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

COMPUTING DEMAND Lagrange Multiplier Method

Aim

Set up the Lagrangian

mxpxpxx aa 2211

121 tosubject max

22111

21,,

21

xpxpmxxL aa

xx

Page 14: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

COMPUTING DEMAND Lagrange Multiplier Method

Differentiate

(3) 0

(2) 0)1(

(1) 0

2211

2212

11

21

11

xpxpmL

pxxax

L

pxaxx

L

aa

aa

Page 15: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

COMPUTING DEMAND Lagrange Multiplier Method

From (1) and (2)

Then re-arranging

2

21

1

12

11 1

p

xxa

p

xaxλ

aaaa-

1

2

2

1

1 xa

ax

p

p

Page 16: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

COMPUTING DEMAND Lagrange Multiplier Method

Rearrange

Remember

axap

xp

1

2211

mxpxp 2211

Page 17: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

COMPUTING DEMAND Lagrange Multiplier Method

Substitute

axap

xp

1

2211

mxpxp 2211

Page 18: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

COMPUTING DEMAND Lagrange Multiplier Method

Solve x1* and x2*

and 1

*1 p

amx

2

*2

1

p

max

Page 19: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

COMPUTING DEMAND Method 2

Suppose that the consumer has Cobb-Douglas preferences.

U x x x xa b( , )1 2 1 2

Page 20: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

COMPUTING DEMAND Method 2

Suppose that the consumer has Cobb-Douglas preferences.

U x x x xa b( , )1 2 1 2

MUUx

ax xa b1

11

12

MUUx

bx xa b2

21 2

1

Page 21: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

COMPUTING DEMAND Method 2

So the MRS is

MRSdxdx

U xU x

ax x

bx x

axbx

a b

a b

2

1

1

2

11

2

1 21

2

1

//

.

Page 22: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

COMPUTING DEMAND Method 2

So the MRS is

At (x1*,x2*), MRS = -p1/p2 , i.e. the slope of the budget constraint.

MRSdxdx

U xU x

ax x

bx x

axbx

a b

a b

2

1

1

2

11

2

1 21

2

1

//

.

Page 23: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

COMPUTING DEMAND Method 2

So the MRS is

At (x1*,x2*), MRS = -p1/p2 so

MRSdxdx

U xU x

ax x

bx x

axbx

a b

a b

2

1

1

2

11

2

1 21

2

1

//

.

ax

bx

pp

xbpap

x2

1

1

22

1

21

*

** *. (A)

Page 24: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

COMPUTING DEMAND Method 2

(x1*,x2*) also exhausts the budget so

p x p x m1 1 2 2* * . (B)

Page 25: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

COMPUTING DEMAND Method 2

So now we know that

xbpap

x21

21

* * (A)

p x p x m1 1 2 2* * . (B)

Page 26: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

COMPUTING DEMAND Method 2

So now we know that

xbpap

x21

21

* * (A)

p x p x m1 1 2 2* * . (B)

Substitute

Page 27: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

COMPUTING DEMAND Method 2

So now we know that

xbpap

x21

21

* * (A)

p x p x m1 1 2 2* * . (B)

p x pbpap

x m1 1 21

21

* * .

Substitute

and get

This simplifies to ….

Page 28: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

COMPUTING DEMAND Method 2

xam

a b p11

*

( ).

Page 29: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

COMPUTING DEMAND Method 2

2

*2 )( pba

bmx

Substituting for x1* in p x p x m1 1 2 2

* *

then gives

1

*1 )( pba

amx

Page 30: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

COMPUTING DEMAND Method 2

So we have discovered that the mostpreferred affordable bundle for a consumerwith Cobb-Douglas preferences

U x x x xa b( , )1 2 1 2

is )(21

*2

*1 )(

,)(

),(pba

mb

pba

maxx

Page 31: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

COMPUTING DEMAND Method 2: Cobb-Douglas

x1

x2

xam

a b p11

*

( )

x

bma b p

2

2

*

( )

U x x x xa b( , )1 2 1 2

Page 32: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

Rational Constrained Choice

But what if x1* = 0 or x2* = 0?

If either x1* = 0 or x2* = 0 then the ordinary demand (x1*,x2*) is at a corner solution to the problem of maximizing utility subject to a budget constraint.

Page 33: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

Examples of Corner Solutions: Perfect Substitutes

x1

x2

MRS = -1

Page 34: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

Examples of Corner Solutions: Perfect Substitutes

x1

x2

MRS = -1

Slope = -p1/p2 with p1 > p2.

Page 35: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

Examples of Corner Solutions: Perfect Substitutes

x1

x2

MRS = -1

Slope = -p1/p2 with p1 > p2.

Page 36: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

Examples of Corner Solutions: Perfect Substitutes

x1

x2

2

*2 p

mx

x1 0*

MRS = -1 (This is the indifference curve)

Slope = -p1/p2 with p1 > p2.

Page 37: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

Examples of Corner Solutions: Perfect Substitutes

x1

x2

1

*1 p

mx

x2 0*

MRS = -1

Slope = -p1/p2 with p1 < p2.

ANOTHER EXAMPLE

Page 38: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

Examples of Corner Solutions: Perfect Substitutes

So when U(x1,x2) = x1 + x2, the mostpreferred affordable bundle is (x1*,x2*)where

0,),(

1

*2

*1 p

mxx

or

2

*2

*1 ,0),(

p

mxx

if p1 < p2

if p1 > p2.

Page 39: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

Examples of Corner Solutions: Perfect Substitutes

x1

x2

MRS = -1

Slope = -p1/p2 with p1 = p2.

1p

m

2p

m

The budget constraint and the utility curve lie on each other

Page 40: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

Examples of Corner Solutions: Perfect Substitutes

x1

x2

All the bundles in the constraint are equally the most preferred affordable when p1 = p2.

yp2

yp1

Page 41: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions: Perfect Complements

X1 (tonic)

X2 (gin) U(x1,x2) = min(ax1,x2)

x2 = ax1 (a = .5)

Page 42: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions: Perfect Complements

x1

x2

MRS = 0

U(x1,x2) = min(ax1,x2)

x2 = ax1

Page 43: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions: Perfect Complements

x1

x2

MRS = -

MRS = 0

U(x1,x2) = min(ax1,x2)

x2 = ax1

Page 44: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions: Perfect Complements

x1

x2

MRS = -

MRS = 0

MRS is undefined

U(x1,x2) = min(ax1,x2)

x2 = ax1

Page 45: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions: Perfect Complements

x1

x2U(x1,x2) = min(ax1,x2)

x2 = ax1

Page 46: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions: Perfect Complements

x1

x2U(x1,x2) = min(ax1,x2)

x2 = ax1

Which is the mostpreferred affordable bundle?

Page 47: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions: Perfect Complements

x1

x2U(x1,x2) = min(ax1,x2)

x2 = ax1

The most preferredaffordable bundle

Page 48: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions: Perfect Complements

x1

x2U(x1,x2) = min(ax1,x2)

x2 = ax1

x1*

x2*

Page 49: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions: Perfect Complements

x1

x2U(x1,x2) = min(ax1,x2)

x2 = ax1

x1*

x2*

and p1x1* + p2x2* = m

Page 50: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions: Perfect Complements

x1

x2U(x1,x2) = min(ax1,x2)

x2 = ax1

x1*

x2*

(a) p1x1* + p2x2* = m(b) x2* = ax1*

Page 51: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions: Perfect Complements

(a) p1x1* + p2x2* = m; (b) x2* = ax1*

Page 52: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions: Perfect Complements

(a) p1x1* + p2x2* = m; (b) x2* = ax1*.

Substitution from (b) for x2* in (a) gives p1x1* + p2ax1* = m

Page 53: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions: Perfect Complements

(a) p1x1* + p2x2* = m; (b) x2* = ax1*.

Substitution from (b) for x2* in (a) gives p1x1* + p2ax1* = mwhich gives

21

*1 app

mx

Page 54: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions: Perfect Complements

(a) p1x1* + p2x2* = m; (b) x2* = ax1*.

Substitution from (b) for x2* in (a) gives p1x1* + p2ax1* = mwhich gives

21

*2

21

*1 ;

app

amx

app

mx

Page 55: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions: Perfect Complements

(a) p1x1* + p2x2* = m; (b) x2* = ax1*.

Substitution from (b) for x2* in (a) gives p1x1* + p2ax1* = mwhich gives

21

*2

21

*1 ;

app

amx

app

mx

Page 56: Rational Choice. CHOICE 1. Scarcity (income constraint) 2. Tastes (indifference map/utility function)

Examples of ‘Kinky’ Solutions: Perfect Complements

x1

x2U(x1,x2) = min(ax1,x2)

x2 = ax1

xm

p ap11 2

*

x

amp ap

2

1 2

*


Recommended