+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic Homo sapiens complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic Homo sapiens complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

Date post: 20-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: zea
View: 37 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic Homo sapiens complex in Levantine Southwest Asia. Major Sites to be Covered. “Neandertal” characteristics. Low, long skull Heavy Brow Ridges Robust Skeleton and Cranium Retromolar gap. No chin. Large, cold adapted nose. Occipital Bun. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
33
Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic Homo sapiens complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.
Transcript
Page 1: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic Homo sapiens complex in Levantine

Southwest Asia.

Page 2: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

Major Sites to be Covered.

Page 3: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

“Neandertal” characteristics

Low, long skull Heavy Brow Ridges Robust Skeleton and Cranium Retromolar gap. No chin. Large, cold adapted nose. Occipital Bun

Page 4: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

Cro-Magnon Man, or AMHS, from Europe.

Page 5: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

“Classic” Neandertals from Western Europe.

Page 6: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

Qafzeh.

Page 7: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

Qafzeh Skull, considered to be AMHS.

Page 8: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

Qafzeh

Page 9: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

Qafzeh VI, also considered AMHS

Page 10: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

Skhul

Page 11: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

Skhul, also considered AMHS

Page 12: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

Skhul side view.

Page 13: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

Location of Amud.

Page 14: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

Amud.

Page 15: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

Amud 1

Page 16: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

Amud 1.

Page 17: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

Amud Comment:

Don Johansen (1994): “Amud I shows affinities with the neandertals of Shandiar Cave in Iraq and Tabun, but is also has some similarities to the Skhul and Qafzeh populations of early Homo sapiens.”

Page 18: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

Kebara.

Page 19: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

Tabun.

Page 20: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

A Neandertal with a Chin!

Neandertals have been referred to affectionately as “chinless wonders”, as they do not characteristically possess a chin.

At the Tabun site, specimen II Rak(1998) states: “I would like to stress, therefore, that my insistence on recognizing a true chin in Tabun II is based on the topography of the anterior section of the mandible, which consists of the unique morphological components defined as constituting a true chin”.

Page 21: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

Amud and Skhul compared.

Page 22: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

Qafzeh VI and Tabun Compared.

Page 23: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

Qafzeh IX and Skhul VI

Page 24: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

Shared Time.

Page 25: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

Thermoluminescence Dates

Tabun 386-151 kya Qafzeh 102-85 kya Skhul 119-118 kya Kebara 61.6-48.3 kya Amud 70-50 kya

Page 26: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

Electron Spin Resonance Dates

TABUN 386-151 kya AMUD 59-43 kya

Page 27: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

Time Line Conflict for linear evolution/gradualism

The problem arises here that the supposed AMHS sites of Qafzeh and Skhul predate some of the supposed Neandertal sites.

Explanations of why this situation resulted is the “ebb and flow theory”, where cold adapted Neandertals come down when the glaciers expand, and AMHS retreat to Africa.

Bar-Yosef describes the Levant as the “central bus station”

Page 28: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

Multiregional Evolution vs. Replacement Theories.

Multiregional Evolution posits that our species evolved in the various areas that Homo erectus/ergaster colonized in the first ‘out of Africa’ migration, and evolved into AMHS with a constant gene flow out of Africa

Replacement Theory says there were only two migrations out of Africa, with the latter one coming ~100 kya and replacing all prior homininds completely

Page 29: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

Shared Technology and Culture.

At all sites in the Levant, the Mousterian Culture is present and dominant.

Earlier Levallois technology is present at the oldest site of Tabun, which is to be expected

There is no technological ‘tool kit’ in the Levant comparable to the advances present in Cro-Magnon sites in Europe.

Page 30: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

Mousterian Technology.

Page 31: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

More Mousterian Technology

Page 32: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

My argument.

Shared/overlapping time. Shared/overlapping space. Shared/overlapping morphology. Shared material culture in the form of the

Mousterian technology. If you have all of these represented in one

region, you have one variable population and not two separate species.

Page 33: Re-examination of the Neandertal and Archaic  Homo sapiens  complex in Levantine Southwest Asia.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/neanderthals/skulls.html


Recommended