Reactive Power Coordination Workshop
Stephen Solis
System Operations Improvement Manager
ERCOT Public
September 6, 2019
PUBLIC
Antitrust Admonition
2
PUBLIC
Introductions
• Around the Room
3
Reactive Power Coordination Workshop• Reactive Power Coordination (RPC Overview)
• Break
• NPRR 966
• Break
• Wrap Up/Discussion/Q&A
Presenter
Stephen Solis
System Operations Improvement Manager
ERCOT Public
September 6, 2019
PUBLIC
Reactive Coordination
• Conducted by ERCOT and ERCOT
Transmission Operators
• Several new ERCOT Transmission
Operators established in past few years
• Renewable generation capacity has grown
and continues to grow
• NERC Requirements continue to change
5
PUBLIC
Problem Statement
6
The integration of renewable generation within the ERCOT
interconnection has introduced several new Transmission
Operators and fundamentally altered the generation
dispatch pattern in the region.
A new tool is needed to address multiple interrelated
objectives of coordination of voltage and reactive control
between TOs, maintaining reliability by preventing and or
correcting System Operating Limit (SOL) exceedances,
minimizing cost of maintenance resulting from increased
switching, and maintaining or improving transfer capability
both in real time and in operations planning timeframe.
PUBLIC
Increasing complexity of voltage control
7
# of SVCs and Shunts continue to rise in ERCOT
# of new generation technologies increasing (solar,
wind, battery)
PUBLIC
Voltage Assessments and Monitoring
8
• ERCOT and the TOs share responsibilities related to the TOP function. o Real Time
• ERCOT is responsible for monitoring (real-time monitoring) and
assessing (Real-Time Assessment) voltage both pre-contingency and
post-contingency voltages for voltage limit exceedances (i.e. voltage
violations) for the entire ERCOT system. ERCOT assesses the system
every 5 minutes.
• TOs are responsible for monitoring voltage pre-contingency in real time
for their respective area.
• ERCOT and TOs jointly responsible for VAR-001 R3
o Same-day Operations, Operations Planning• ERCOT is currently, solely responsible for VAR-001 R2 (scheduling
sufficient reactive resources for pre and post contingency voltage control)
• ERCOT is currently, solely responsible for the Operational Planning
Analysis (OPA) assessing voltage both pre-contingency and post-
contingency voltages for voltage limit exceedances.
PUBLIC
Relevant NERC Standards
9
• IRO-008 R1-R6 (RC)
• TOP-001 R13-R15 (TOP)
• VAR-001 R1-R3 (TOP)
• Definition of Operational Planning Analysis (OPA)
• Definition of Real- Time Assessment (RTA)
PUBLIC
Operational Event
10
• Prior to the event on March 20th, TOs had several transmission lines out for
construction or maintenance in the Del Rio, San Angelo, and Mesa View
area. These outages, combined with the forced extension of the Maverick
– Escondido 138 kV line outage, resulted in load in the South McCamey to
Sonora and South Hamilton Road being served by two 138 kV lines: North
McCamey – Santa Rita and San Angelo Power – Santiago – Live Oak. As
wind generation ramped down to zero in the area, the San Angelo Power –
Santiago – Live Oak 138 kV line loading increased to 100% of its
continuous rating. When the San Angelo Power – Santiago – Live Oak 138
kV line tripped, all of the load serving the area moved to the North
McCamey – Santa Rita 138 kV causing a local voltage collapse.
• The Maverick – Eagle Hydro – Escondido 138 kV line outage was first
extended on 3/19 at 15:13 to return on 3/20 at 16:00 which is after the
Next Day Study assessment. This means that the Next Day Study
assessment conducted on 3/19 expected the Maverick – Eagle Hydro –
Escondido 138 kV line to be in service during the study time frame.
PUBLIC
Real Time - Voltage Violations Trends
11
• Significant improvements have been made for real time operations over last 5 years
• 2014 – Voltage Limits ERCOT/TO synchronizing
• 2015-2016 – 66kV system/chronic voltage violators
• 2016-2017 – State Estimator cleanup/TO operational changes
• 2018-2019 – NPRR 776 implementation and TRE audits
• ERCOT assesses both pre and post contingency every 5 minutes (includes 69kV)
PUBLIC
Real Time - Voltage Violations Trends
12
2019 is trending less than 2017
PUBLIC
Voltage Violations January 2019 and April 2019
13
type of exceedances# of exceedances in a month (1/1/19
to 1/31/19)
# of exceedances
> 30 min% > 30 min
post-voltage-high 1,029 49 4.76%
post-voltage-low 6,535 172 2.63%
Pre-voltage-high 8,415 246 2.92%
Pre-voltage-low 429 6 1.40%
total 28194 797 2.83%
type of exceedances# of exceedances in a month (4/1/19
to 4/30/19)
# of exceedances
> 30 min% > 30 min
post-voltage-high 1,013 47 4.64%
post-voltage-low 4,734 132 2.79%
Pre-voltage-high 4,877 167 3.42%
Pre-voltage-low 282 7 2.48%
total 23,607 780 3.30%
• This data is meant to convey the breakdown of different types of voltage violations
• Every 5 minute interval exceeded counts as 1 and this data does not include 69kV
• One contingency can cause multiple exceedances (both local impact and multiple
nodes)
• One local area can have multiple pre-contingency and post contingency exceedances
• Could include some invalid exceedances if caused by bad telemetry, etc.
PUBLIC
Reactive Power Coordination “Tool”
• ERCOT is actively working on a project to develop a multi
hour look ahead tool to improve reactive power coordination
within the ERCOT region.
• This tool is being called the Reactive Power Coordination
(RPC) tool.
• The RPC tool will optimize reactive power controls (shunt
devices, Generator Voltage Set Points, Static Var
Compensators (SVCs), etc.) across a multi-hour interval to
resolve reactive power and voltage-related constraints
(voltage limits, temporal constraints, reactive reserves, etc.)
under both normal and contingency conditions.
14
PUBLIC
Reactive Power Coordination “Tool”
15
Power FlowContingency
AnalysisMW SCOPF
Model
COP
Outages
Constraints
Limits
Contingencies
RPC
Remaining Violations
Reactive Dispatch to
TOs
Commit Additional Generation
Create Manual Operating Plans
PUBLIC
Reactive Power Coordination “Tool” benefits
• Allows for more realistic and reliable future look ahead
studies
• Fewer real time voltage limit exceedances
• Help to ensure that sufficient reactive reserves are
maintained
• Fewer real time Constraint Management Plans (CMPs) and
more identified in advance of real time.
• Improved reactive flows and transfer capabilities (e.g. lower
MVAR flows in some areas, fewer areas with circulating
MVAR flows, increased voltage stability limits, etc.)
• Enhanced coordination between TOs
16
PUBLIC
Reactive Power Coordination “Tool” benefits
• To perform more realistic and reliable future look ahead
studies, ERCOT needs to have reliable information on how
the reactive controls on the system will be utilized.
– Looking at multiple hours in advance allows better evaluation for
outage conflicts and reactive deficiencies within the operating days
– Hourly 4 hour ahead look ahead study is still challenged in knowing
what manual switching actions beyond those which are automatic
(determined via AVR schedules (set point and deviation band)).
– Manual reactive control movements vary from each operator/engineer
and may not reflect how a TO would operate the manual controls
• Engineers performing look ahead studies will have an
automatic and consistent reactive dispatch that is more
realistic to real–time operations.
17
PUBLIC
Operator Awareness
18
• Transmission Operators will still have to deal with
remaining real time issues as forced outages and system
issues will still surface in real time, however there will be
fewer voltage violations that need to be addressed in
Real-Time.
• Regular training should be administered to maintain skills
in addressing voltage issues for when the tool is
unavailable or potentially not factoring in risks like severe
weather.
• Operators will have improved awareness of potential
reactive deficiencies in the current and next day time
frames.
PUBLIC
Reduced Switching Actions
19
• One vendor demonstrated that over a 24 hour period,
without temporal constraints yet, they were able to
reduce the total tap movements from 166 to 75 and shunt
switching from 279 to 206.
• Optimizing the reactive controls will reduce the overall
number of switching actions
PUBLIC
Increased Transfer Capability
20
• Optimizing reactive controls can help increase transfer capability in
areas with voltage stability concerns. Ex. Below
• 60-80 MW improvement for worst line outage (gray)
• 250-350 MW improvement for unit 1 (blue) and unit 2 (orange) outage
outage
PUBLIC
Reactive Power Coordination “Tool”
• The RPC tool will have 3 “modes”.
– Daily study that optimizes the same window as Daily Reliability Unit
Commitment (RUC).
– Hourly study that optimizes across the next 12 hours.
– Offline study mode capable of optimizing up to 48 hours.
• The Daily study reactive dispatch will be more informational
in nature to identify needs for additional coordination or
correction.
• The Hourly study will be more accurate and give a 12 hour
rolling window of expected reactive controls dispatch.
• The Offline study mode will allow scenario testing as
necessary (e.g. severe weather) and potentially serve as a
backup study mode if the normal study mode is unavailable.
21
PUBLIC
RPC Tool Inputs
• Hourly power flow cases
– Load Forecast
– Wind/Solar Forecast
– RUC/COP data
– Outages
– DC Tie schedules
• Constraints
– Physical
– Temporal
• Contingency definitions
• Remedial Action Scheme definitions
• Historical information
– Previous hours switching information for temporal constraints
22
PUBLIC
RPC Tool Constraints
• System voltage limits
– Normal (Pre-contingency)
– Emergency (Post-contingency)
• Dynamic reactive reserves
• Voltage stability limits
• Physical constraints (e.g. reactive capability curves for
generation resources, reactive capability of SVC, AVR status
etc.)
• Temporal constraints (e.g. startup time, minimum run time,
max # of operations within 24 hours, etc.)
23
PUBLIC
RPC Tool Controls
• Static reactive resources
– Shunts
• Reactors
• Capacitors
– Transformer control taps
• Dynamic reactive resources
– SVCs
– STATCOMs
– Synchronous Condensers
– Generating Units
• Unit Commitment, Line Switching, Distribution side reactive
power, Load Shed plans will be handled as needed if RPC
tool cannot solve a constraint.
24
PUBLIC
RPC Output Mock-up Screenshot
25
Run TimeTransmission
OperatorDevice Type STATION
Device
NameKV
Total # of
Control
Actions
HE 01 HE 02 HE 03 HE 04 HE 05 HE 06 HE 07 HE 08 HE 09 HE 10 HE 11 HE 12
1/1/2018 0:02 ERCOT REACTOR MET R1 69 2 ON ON ON OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF ON ON ON
1/1/2018 0:02 ERCOT CAPACITOR MET C1 69 4 OFF ON ON ON OFF ON ON ON OFF OFF OFF OFF
1/1/2018 0:02 ERCOT CAPACITOR MET C2 69 0 OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF
1/1/2018 0:02 ERCOT CAPACITOR MET C3 69 0 OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT
1/1/2018 0:02 ERCOT SVC MET SVC1 138 2 141 141 141 141 141 141 142 141 141 141 141 141
1/1/2018 0:02 ERCOT GENERATOR AUSTIN UNIT 1 138 4 142 141 141 142 142 142 143 143 143 142 142 142
1/1/2018 0:02 ONCOR REACTOR HILLSIDE RX1 138 0 OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF
1/1/2018 0:02 ONCOR REACTOR SIDEHILL RX2 138 1 ON ON OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF
1/1/2018 0:02 ONCOR CAPACITOR SIDEHILL CX1 345 1 ON ON ON ON ON ON ON ON OFF OFF OFF OFF
1/1/2018 0:02 ONCOR CAPACITOR SIDEHILL CX2 345 2 OFF OFF OFF OFF ON ON ON OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF
1/1/2018 0:02 ONCOR LTC LEFTDRIVE LTC1 69 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
1/1/2018 0:02 ONCOR LTC LEFTDRIVE LTC2 69 3 5 5 5 5 5 6 7 7 5 5 5 5
1/1/2018 0:02 CENTERPOINT GENERATOR BEACHSAND U1 69 2 70 70 70 70 72 72 72 72 72 70 70 70
1/1/2018 0:02 CENTERPOINT GENERATOR BEACHSAND U2 69 2 70 70 70 70 72 72 72 72 72 70 70 70
1/1/2018 0:02 CENTERPOINT GENERATOR BEACHSAND U3 69 0 OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT
1/1/2018 0:02 CENTERPOINT CAPACITOR NASA CAP1 69 2 OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF ON ON ON ON OFF OFF OFF
1/1/2018 0:02 CENTERPOINT CAPACITOR NASA CAP2 69 2 OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF ON ON OFF OFF OFF
PUBLIC
RPC Grid Geo
26
There is currently plans in the project to also make the reactive dispatch
available in Grid Geo
PUBLIC
Coordination between ERCOT and TOs
• Project Implementation
– Coordinate on necessary constraints for the RPC tool (e.g. temporal
constraints)
– Coordinate on necessary “cost”/weighting factors for control selection
in the RPC Tool (i.e. prioritizing which reactive devices should be
utilized in what sequence)
– Coordinate on the RPC tool reactive dispatch output file design
• Rule Changes
– Coordinate and implement NPRR 966
– Gray boxed until project goes live
• Testing
– Manual review of RPC tool reactive dispatch for issues
– Pilots and tests of implementing actual RPC tool reactive dispatch
27
PUBLIC
Q&A
28
Reactive Power Coordination Workshop• Reactive Power Coordination (RPC Overview)
• Break
• NPRR 966
• Break
• Wrap Up/Discussion/Q&A
Presenter
Stephen Solis
System Operations Improvement Manager
ERCOT Public
September 6, 2019
We will return at 11:00 AM.
Reactive Power Coordination Workshop• Reactive Power Coordination (RPC Overview)
• Break
• NPRR 966
• Break
• Wrap Up/Discussion/Q&A
Presenter
Stephen Solis
System Operations Improvement Manager
ERCOT Public
September 6, 2019
PUBLIC
NPRR 966 – Outage Coordination
• Sections 3.1.4.3 and 3.1.4.4 clarifies expectations for
entering Outages for reactors, capacitors, reactive controlled
sources for Resource Entities and TSPs so that the Reactive
Power Coordination tool can have accurate awareness of
the availability of the reactors, capacitors, and reactive
controlled sources;
32
PUBLIC
NPRR 966 – Modeling
• Sections 3.10.7.1.4 and Section 3.10.7.1.5 specify the need
to add temporal constraints to the Network Operations Model
for transformers and reactive devices so that the Reactive
Power Coordination tool can have accurate awareness of
any temporal constraints of the reactors, capacitors, or other
reactive controlled sources (e.g. how many times a capacitor
can be switched in or out in a 12 hour period); and
• This will be similar to the information received as part of a
survey in 2017.
33
PUBLIC
NPRR 966 – Voltage Support Service
• Paragraph (7) added to Section 6.5.7.7 for ERCOT to provide the hourly optimized
reactive power dispatch via a TSP-specific Messaging System and also to post the
schedule on the MIS Secure Area accessible by the TSPs.
• This Messaging System will operate very similarly to the one utilized with Qualified
Scheduling Entities (QSEs) but will be for TSPs. This will require the TSPs to
implement an application programming interface (API) on the TSP side to interface
with the Messaging System.
• The TSPs will be responsible for providing this Dispatch schedule to their operators.
• The TSPs will also be required to send an acknowledgement of receipt each hour.
• The TSPs would be required to implement and or instruct others to implement the
Dispatch schedule unless they determine they should not due to reliability reasons
(e.g. a Forced Outage occurs that modifies the necessary reactive Dispatch or the
inability to implement the Dispatch, severe weather, etc.).
• ERCOT will be required to notify the TSPs when the Reactive Power Coordination
tool is unavailable and then when it is available again.
34
PUBLIC
NPRR 966 – Messaging System
35
ERCOT Messaging System API
Transmission Operator Messaging System
APIEMS
ERCOT RPC Tool
ERCOT Operator
TO Operator
Suggested Reactive Dispatch
Messaging System
Dispatch ReceivedAcknowledgement
Provide Dispatch To Operator
Operator Receipt
Acknowledgement
Messaging System
Dispatchxml
Approved dispatch
ReceiptAcknowledgement
PUBLIC
Time Frame
• ERCOT would like to have NPRR 966 make the
December 2019 Board meeting to support
finalization of planning activities in 2019.
• Preliminary scheduling estimates would make
production capability sometime mid-2021. This
schedule will be finalized by end of 2019.
• ERCOT expects to test or pilot results for 3 to 6
months to tune, stabilize and build confidence in
the reactive dispatch prior to un gray boxing
NPRR 966 language.
36
Reactive Power Coordination Workshop• Reactive Power Coordination (RPC Overview)
• Break
• NPRR 966
• Break
• Wrap Up/Discussion/Q&A
Presenter
Stephen Solis
System Operations Improvement Manager
ERCOT Public
September 6, 2019
We will return at 11:45 AM.
Reactive Power Coordination Workshop• Reactive Power Coordination (RPC Overview)
• Break
• NPRR 966
• Break
• Wrap Up/Discussion/Q&A
Presenter
Stephen Solis
System Operations Improvement Manager
ERCOT Public
September 6, 2019
PUBLIC
Q&A
40