+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Reactive Power Coordination Workshop...Reactive Power Coordination “Tool” benefits • To...

Reactive Power Coordination Workshop...Reactive Power Coordination “Tool” benefits • To...

Date post: 24-Oct-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
40
Reactive Power Coordination Workshop Stephen Solis System Operations Improvement Manager ERCOT Public September 6, 2019
Transcript
  • Reactive Power Coordination Workshop

    Stephen Solis

    System Operations Improvement Manager

    ERCOT Public

    September 6, 2019

  • PUBLIC

    Antitrust Admonition

    2

  • PUBLIC

    Introductions

    • Around the Room

    3

  • Reactive Power Coordination Workshop• Reactive Power Coordination (RPC Overview)

    • Break

    • NPRR 966

    • Break

    • Wrap Up/Discussion/Q&A

    Presenter

    Stephen Solis

    System Operations Improvement Manager

    ERCOT Public

    September 6, 2019

  • PUBLIC

    Reactive Coordination

    • Conducted by ERCOT and ERCOT

    Transmission Operators

    • Several new ERCOT Transmission

    Operators established in past few years

    • Renewable generation capacity has grown

    and continues to grow

    • NERC Requirements continue to change

    5

  • PUBLIC

    Problem Statement

    6

    The integration of renewable generation within the ERCOT

    interconnection has introduced several new Transmission

    Operators and fundamentally altered the generation

    dispatch pattern in the region.

    A new tool is needed to address multiple interrelated

    objectives of coordination of voltage and reactive control

    between TOs, maintaining reliability by preventing and or

    correcting System Operating Limit (SOL) exceedances,

    minimizing cost of maintenance resulting from increased

    switching, and maintaining or improving transfer capability

    both in real time and in operations planning timeframe.

  • PUBLIC

    Increasing complexity of voltage control

    7

    # of SVCs and Shunts continue to rise in ERCOT

    # of new generation technologies increasing (solar,

    wind, battery)

  • PUBLIC

    Voltage Assessments and Monitoring

    8

    • ERCOT and the TOs share responsibilities related to the TOP function. o Real Time

    • ERCOT is responsible for monitoring (real-time monitoring) and

    assessing (Real-Time Assessment) voltage both pre-contingency and

    post-contingency voltages for voltage limit exceedances (i.e. voltage

    violations) for the entire ERCOT system. ERCOT assesses the system

    every 5 minutes.

    • TOs are responsible for monitoring voltage pre-contingency in real time

    for their respective area.

    • ERCOT and TOs jointly responsible for VAR-001 R3

    o Same-day Operations, Operations Planning• ERCOT is currently, solely responsible for VAR-001 R2 (scheduling

    sufficient reactive resources for pre and post contingency voltage control)

    • ERCOT is currently, solely responsible for the Operational Planning

    Analysis (OPA) assessing voltage both pre-contingency and post-

    contingency voltages for voltage limit exceedances.

  • PUBLIC

    Relevant NERC Standards

    9

    • IRO-008 R1-R6 (RC)

    • TOP-001 R13-R15 (TOP)

    • VAR-001 R1-R3 (TOP)

    • Definition of Operational Planning Analysis (OPA)

    • Definition of Real- Time Assessment (RTA)

  • PUBLIC

    Operational Event

    10

    • Prior to the event on March 20th, TOs had several transmission lines out for

    construction or maintenance in the Del Rio, San Angelo, and Mesa View

    area. These outages, combined with the forced extension of the Maverick

    – Escondido 138 kV line outage, resulted in load in the South McCamey to

    Sonora and South Hamilton Road being served by two 138 kV lines: North

    McCamey – Santa Rita and San Angelo Power – Santiago – Live Oak. As

    wind generation ramped down to zero in the area, the San Angelo Power –

    Santiago – Live Oak 138 kV line loading increased to 100% of its

    continuous rating. When the San Angelo Power – Santiago – Live Oak 138

    kV line tripped, all of the load serving the area moved to the North

    McCamey – Santa Rita 138 kV causing a local voltage collapse.

    • The Maverick – Eagle Hydro – Escondido 138 kV line outage was first

    extended on 3/19 at 15:13 to return on 3/20 at 16:00 which is after the

    Next Day Study assessment. This means that the Next Day Study

    assessment conducted on 3/19 expected the Maverick – Eagle Hydro –

    Escondido 138 kV line to be in service during the study time frame.

  • PUBLIC

    Real Time - Voltage Violations Trends

    11

    • Significant improvements have been made for real time operations over last 5 years

    • 2014 – Voltage Limits ERCOT/TO synchronizing

    • 2015-2016 – 66kV system/chronic voltage violators

    • 2016-2017 – State Estimator cleanup/TO operational changes

    • 2018-2019 – NPRR 776 implementation and TRE audits

    • ERCOT assesses both pre and post contingency every 5 minutes (includes 69kV)

  • PUBLIC

    Real Time - Voltage Violations Trends

    12

    2019 is trending less than 2017

  • PUBLIC

    Voltage Violations January 2019 and April 2019

    13

    type of exceedances# of exceedances in a month (1/1/19

    to 1/31/19)

    # of exceedances

    > 30 min% > 30 min

    post-voltage-high 1,029 49 4.76%

    post-voltage-low 6,535 172 2.63%

    Pre-voltage-high 8,415 246 2.92%

    Pre-voltage-low 429 6 1.40%

    total 28194 797 2.83%

    type of exceedances# of exceedances in a month (4/1/19

    to 4/30/19)

    # of exceedances

    > 30 min% > 30 min

    post-voltage-high 1,013 47 4.64%

    post-voltage-low 4,734 132 2.79%

    Pre-voltage-high 4,877 167 3.42%

    Pre-voltage-low 282 7 2.48%

    total 23,607 780 3.30%

    • This data is meant to convey the breakdown of different types of voltage violations

    • Every 5 minute interval exceeded counts as 1 and this data does not include 69kV

    • One contingency can cause multiple exceedances (both local impact and multiple

    nodes)

    • One local area can have multiple pre-contingency and post contingency exceedances

    • Could include some invalid exceedances if caused by bad telemetry, etc.

  • PUBLIC

    Reactive Power Coordination “Tool”

    • ERCOT is actively working on a project to develop a multi

    hour look ahead tool to improve reactive power coordination

    within the ERCOT region.

    • This tool is being called the Reactive Power Coordination

    (RPC) tool.

    • The RPC tool will optimize reactive power controls (shunt

    devices, Generator Voltage Set Points, Static Var

    Compensators (SVCs), etc.) across a multi-hour interval to

    resolve reactive power and voltage-related constraints

    (voltage limits, temporal constraints, reactive reserves, etc.)

    under both normal and contingency conditions.

    14

  • PUBLIC

    Reactive Power Coordination “Tool”

    15

    Power FlowContingency

    AnalysisMW SCOPF

    Model

    COP

    Outages

    Constraints

    Limits

    Contingencies

    RPC

    Remaining Violations

    Reactive Dispatch to

    TOs

    Commit Additional Generation

    Create Manual Operating Plans

  • PUBLIC

    Reactive Power Coordination “Tool” benefits

    • Allows for more realistic and reliable future look ahead

    studies

    • Fewer real time voltage limit exceedances

    • Help to ensure that sufficient reactive reserves are

    maintained

    • Fewer real time Constraint Management Plans (CMPs) and

    more identified in advance of real time.

    • Improved reactive flows and transfer capabilities (e.g. lower

    MVAR flows in some areas, fewer areas with circulating

    MVAR flows, increased voltage stability limits, etc.)

    • Enhanced coordination between TOs

    16

  • PUBLIC

    Reactive Power Coordination “Tool” benefits

    • To perform more realistic and reliable future look ahead

    studies, ERCOT needs to have reliable information on how

    the reactive controls on the system will be utilized.

    – Looking at multiple hours in advance allows better evaluation for

    outage conflicts and reactive deficiencies within the operating days

    – Hourly 4 hour ahead look ahead study is still challenged in knowing

    what manual switching actions beyond those which are automatic

    (determined via AVR schedules (set point and deviation band)).

    – Manual reactive control movements vary from each operator/engineer

    and may not reflect how a TO would operate the manual controls

    • Engineers performing look ahead studies will have an

    automatic and consistent reactive dispatch that is more

    realistic to real–time operations.

    17

  • PUBLIC

    Operator Awareness

    18

    • Transmission Operators will still have to deal with

    remaining real time issues as forced outages and system

    issues will still surface in real time, however there will be

    fewer voltage violations that need to be addressed in

    Real-Time.

    • Regular training should be administered to maintain skills

    in addressing voltage issues for when the tool is

    unavailable or potentially not factoring in risks like severe

    weather.

    • Operators will have improved awareness of potential

    reactive deficiencies in the current and next day time

    frames.

  • PUBLIC

    Reduced Switching Actions

    19

    • One vendor demonstrated that over a 24 hour period,

    without temporal constraints yet, they were able to

    reduce the total tap movements from 166 to 75 and shunt

    switching from 279 to 206.

    • Optimizing the reactive controls will reduce the overall

    number of switching actions

  • PUBLIC

    Increased Transfer Capability

    20

    • Optimizing reactive controls can help increase transfer capability in

    areas with voltage stability concerns. Ex. Below

    • 60-80 MW improvement for worst line outage (gray)

    • 250-350 MW improvement for unit 1 (blue) and unit 2 (orange) outage

    outage

  • PUBLIC

    Reactive Power Coordination “Tool”

    • The RPC tool will have 3 “modes”.

    – Daily study that optimizes the same window as Daily Reliability Unit

    Commitment (RUC).

    – Hourly study that optimizes across the next 12 hours.

    – Offline study mode capable of optimizing up to 48 hours.

    • The Daily study reactive dispatch will be more informational

    in nature to identify needs for additional coordination or

    correction.

    • The Hourly study will be more accurate and give a 12 hour

    rolling window of expected reactive controls dispatch.

    • The Offline study mode will allow scenario testing as

    necessary (e.g. severe weather) and potentially serve as a

    backup study mode if the normal study mode is unavailable.

    21

  • PUBLIC

    RPC Tool Inputs

    • Hourly power flow cases

    – Load Forecast

    – Wind/Solar Forecast

    – RUC/COP data

    – Outages

    – DC Tie schedules

    • Constraints

    – Physical

    – Temporal

    • Contingency definitions

    • Remedial Action Scheme definitions

    • Historical information

    – Previous hours switching information for temporal constraints

    22

  • PUBLIC

    RPC Tool Constraints

    • System voltage limits

    – Normal (Pre-contingency)

    – Emergency (Post-contingency)

    • Dynamic reactive reserves

    • Voltage stability limits

    • Physical constraints (e.g. reactive capability curves for

    generation resources, reactive capability of SVC, AVR status

    etc.)

    • Temporal constraints (e.g. startup time, minimum run time,

    max # of operations within 24 hours, etc.)

    23

  • PUBLIC

    RPC Tool Controls

    • Static reactive resources

    – Shunts

    • Reactors

    • Capacitors

    – Transformer control taps

    • Dynamic reactive resources

    – SVCs

    – STATCOMs

    – Synchronous Condensers

    – Generating Units

    • Unit Commitment, Line Switching, Distribution side reactive

    power, Load Shed plans will be handled as needed if RPC

    tool cannot solve a constraint.

    24

  • PUBLIC

    RPC Output Mock-up Screenshot

    25

    Run TimeTransmission

    OperatorDevice Type STATION

    Device

    NameKV

    Total # of

    Control

    Actions

    HE 01 HE 02 HE 03 HE 04 HE 05 HE 06 HE 07 HE 08 HE 09 HE 10 HE 11 HE 12

    1/1/2018 0:02 ERCOT REACTOR MET R1 69 2 ON ON ON OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF ON ON ON

    1/1/2018 0:02 ERCOT CAPACITOR MET C1 69 4 OFF ON ON ON OFF ON ON ON OFF OFF OFF OFF

    1/1/2018 0:02 ERCOT CAPACITOR MET C2 69 0 OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF

    1/1/2018 0:02 ERCOT CAPACITOR MET C3 69 0 OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT

    1/1/2018 0:02 ERCOT SVC MET SVC1 138 2 141 141 141 141 141 141 142 141 141 141 141 141

    1/1/2018 0:02 ERCOT GENERATOR AUSTIN UNIT 1 138 4 142 141 141 142 142 142 143 143 143 142 142 142

    1/1/2018 0:02 ONCOR REACTOR HILLSIDE RX1 138 0 OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF

    1/1/2018 0:02 ONCOR REACTOR SIDEHILL RX2 138 1 ON ON OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF

    1/1/2018 0:02 ONCOR CAPACITOR SIDEHILL CX1 345 1 ON ON ON ON ON ON ON ON OFF OFF OFF OFF

    1/1/2018 0:02 ONCOR CAPACITOR SIDEHILL CX2 345 2 OFF OFF OFF OFF ON ON ON OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF

    1/1/2018 0:02 ONCOR LTC LEFTDRIVE LTC1 69 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

    1/1/2018 0:02 ONCOR LTC LEFTDRIVE LTC2 69 3 5 5 5 5 5 6 7 7 5 5 5 5

    1/1/2018 0:02 CENTERPOINT GENERATOR BEACHSAND U1 69 2 70 70 70 70 72 72 72 72 72 70 70 70

    1/1/2018 0:02 CENTERPOINT GENERATOR BEACHSAND U2 69 2 70 70 70 70 72 72 72 72 72 70 70 70

    1/1/2018 0:02 CENTERPOINT GENERATOR BEACHSAND U3 69 0 OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT OUT

    1/1/2018 0:02 CENTERPOINT CAPACITOR NASA CAP1 69 2 OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF ON ON ON ON OFF OFF OFF

    1/1/2018 0:02 CENTERPOINT CAPACITOR NASA CAP2 69 2 OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF ON ON OFF OFF OFF

  • PUBLIC

    RPC Grid Geo

    26

    There is currently plans in the project to also make the reactive dispatch

    available in Grid Geo

  • PUBLIC

    Coordination between ERCOT and TOs

    • Project Implementation

    – Coordinate on necessary constraints for the RPC tool (e.g. temporal

    constraints)

    – Coordinate on necessary “cost”/weighting factors for control selection

    in the RPC Tool (i.e. prioritizing which reactive devices should be

    utilized in what sequence)

    – Coordinate on the RPC tool reactive dispatch output file design

    • Rule Changes

    – Coordinate and implement NPRR 966

    – Gray boxed until project goes live

    • Testing

    – Manual review of RPC tool reactive dispatch for issues

    – Pilots and tests of implementing actual RPC tool reactive dispatch

    27

  • PUBLIC

    Q&A

    28

  • Reactive Power Coordination Workshop• Reactive Power Coordination (RPC Overview)

    • Break

    • NPRR 966

    • Break

    • Wrap Up/Discussion/Q&A

    Presenter

    Stephen Solis

    System Operations Improvement Manager

    ERCOT Public

    September 6, 2019

  • We will return at 11:00 AM.

  • Reactive Power Coordination Workshop• Reactive Power Coordination (RPC Overview)

    • Break

    • NPRR 966

    • Break

    • Wrap Up/Discussion/Q&A

    Presenter

    Stephen Solis

    System Operations Improvement Manager

    ERCOT Public

    September 6, 2019

  • PUBLIC

    NPRR 966 – Outage Coordination

    • Sections 3.1.4.3 and 3.1.4.4 clarifies expectations for

    entering Outages for reactors, capacitors, reactive controlled

    sources for Resource Entities and TSPs so that the Reactive

    Power Coordination tool can have accurate awareness of

    the availability of the reactors, capacitors, and reactive

    controlled sources;

    32

  • PUBLIC

    NPRR 966 – Modeling

    • Sections 3.10.7.1.4 and Section 3.10.7.1.5 specify the need

    to add temporal constraints to the Network Operations Model

    for transformers and reactive devices so that the Reactive

    Power Coordination tool can have accurate awareness of

    any temporal constraints of the reactors, capacitors, or other

    reactive controlled sources (e.g. how many times a capacitor

    can be switched in or out in a 12 hour period); and

    • This will be similar to the information received as part of a

    survey in 2017.

    33

  • PUBLIC

    NPRR 966 – Voltage Support Service

    • Paragraph (7) added to Section 6.5.7.7 for ERCOT to provide the hourly optimized

    reactive power dispatch via a TSP-specific Messaging System and also to post the

    schedule on the MIS Secure Area accessible by the TSPs.

    • This Messaging System will operate very similarly to the one utilized with Qualified

    Scheduling Entities (QSEs) but will be for TSPs. This will require the TSPs to

    implement an application programming interface (API) on the TSP side to interface

    with the Messaging System.

    • The TSPs will be responsible for providing this Dispatch schedule to their operators.

    • The TSPs will also be required to send an acknowledgement of receipt each hour.

    • The TSPs would be required to implement and or instruct others to implement the

    Dispatch schedule unless they determine they should not due to reliability reasons

    (e.g. a Forced Outage occurs that modifies the necessary reactive Dispatch or the

    inability to implement the Dispatch, severe weather, etc.).

    • ERCOT will be required to notify the TSPs when the Reactive Power Coordination

    tool is unavailable and then when it is available again.

    34

  • PUBLIC

    NPRR 966 – Messaging System

    35

    ERCOT Messaging System API

    Transmission Operator Messaging System

    APIEMS

    ERCOT RPC Tool

    ERCOT Operator

    TO Operator

    Suggested Reactive Dispatch

    Messaging System

    Dispatch ReceivedAcknowledgement

    Provide Dispatch To Operator

    Operator Receipt

    Acknowledgement

    Messaging System

    Dispatchxml

    Approved dispatch

    ReceiptAcknowledgement

  • PUBLIC

    Time Frame

    • ERCOT would like to have NPRR 966 make the

    December 2019 Board meeting to support

    finalization of planning activities in 2019.

    • Preliminary scheduling estimates would make

    production capability sometime mid-2021. This

    schedule will be finalized by end of 2019.

    • ERCOT expects to test or pilot results for 3 to 6

    months to tune, stabilize and build confidence in

    the reactive dispatch prior to un gray boxing

    NPRR 966 language.

    36

  • Reactive Power Coordination Workshop• Reactive Power Coordination (RPC Overview)

    • Break

    • NPRR 966

    • Break

    • Wrap Up/Discussion/Q&A

    Presenter

    Stephen Solis

    System Operations Improvement Manager

    ERCOT Public

    September 6, 2019

  • We will return at 11:45 AM.

  • Reactive Power Coordination Workshop• Reactive Power Coordination (RPC Overview)

    • Break

    • NPRR 966

    • Break

    • Wrap Up/Discussion/Q&A

    Presenter

    Stephen Solis

    System Operations Improvement Manager

    ERCOT Public

    September 6, 2019

  • PUBLIC

    Q&A

    40


Recommended