+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Read Aloud Sessions: Tackling Sensitive Issues through Literature

Read Aloud Sessions: Tackling Sensitive Issues through Literature

Date post: 27-Jan-2017
Category:
Upload: joanna-sullivan
View: 213 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
6
Read Aloud Sessions: Tackling Sensitive Issues through Literature Author(s): Joanna Sullivan Source: The Reading Teacher, Vol. 40, No. 9 (May, 1987), pp. 874-878 Published by: Wiley on behalf of the International Reading Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20199656 . Accessed: 28/06/2014 13:29 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. . Wiley and International Reading Association are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Reading Teacher. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 91.223.28.163 on Sat, 28 Jun 2014 13:29:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Transcript

Read Aloud Sessions: Tackling Sensitive Issues through LiteratureAuthor(s): Joanna SullivanSource: The Reading Teacher, Vol. 40, No. 9 (May, 1987), pp. 874-878Published by: Wiley on behalf of the International Reading AssociationStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20199656 .

Accessed: 28/06/2014 13:29

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

.

Wiley and International Reading Association are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extendaccess to The Reading Teacher.

http://www.jstor.org

This content downloaded from 91.223.28.163 on Sat, 28 Jun 2014 13:29:06 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Read aloud sessions:

Tackling sensitive issues

through literature

You don't have to be a trained therapist to lead a good class discussion about life's problems. Why not use children's favorite books as springboards?

Joanna Sullivan

A read aloud session can be a simpli fied form of bibliotherapy.

At its best, bibliotherapy is a com

plex process involving the use of books to help change pupils' attitudes and be havior (Bohning, 1981). It requires the

generous resource of library time that is not restricted to a once-a-week

hourly visit and a management plan similar to that of an individualized

reading program, a plan that offers the time and opportunity for individuals to

examine issues and problems relevant to their own lives through the themes of literature. Bibliotherapy requires a

special sensitivity during discussion, when teacher and pupil sit together to examine the story's problems.

Teachers are not therapists, yet most

with whom I have talked find a need to

deal with the concerns of today's trou

874 The Reading Teacher May 1987

bled society. For example, there is ris

ing anxiety over drugs, and in the USA

"People are afraid that the moral fiber of our country is falling apart," stated

Mary Futrell, president of the National Education Association (1986).

It is, after all, possible to deal qui etly with children's common concerns in a group way and at the same time

give the children experience of listen

ing to and discussing good stories. This article will explain how read aloud sessions can be developed to

ward these ends.

A case in point One 4th grade teacher, Mrs. Sheitel, is

quite concerned. The pupils in her classroom are as diverse in back

ground as those of the suburban com

munity of which they are a part. Many have migrated from other parts of the

country as a result of industrial expan sion in the area, and a significant num

This content downloaded from 91.223.28.163 on Sat, 28 Jun 2014 13:29:06 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

ber of them are in the process of

adjusting to their new surroundings. Mrs. Sheitel is sensitive to her pu

pils' feelings. She is quick to identify those who come to school troubled, those who are happy and well adjusted and those, particularly the slow learn

ers, who have difficulty gaining ac

ceptance from others. She is aware that more than half of her class are unsu

pervised after school because their

parents work. She also knows that a

third of her pupils have lived through divorce and are now from single parent homes.

Mrs. Sheitel has seen dramatic

changes in Sandy's behavior since her

parents' divorce. Sandy has become withdrawn. Her grades have dropped; yet she has never discussed her prob lems with Mrs. Sheitel, who is eager to give her support. Mrs. Sheitel has seen Pete change, too. He has become

aggressive and disruptive lately. Could it be that he has had to forfeit much of

his parents' attention to his new baby sister?

The value of discussion Since she spends more time with these

youngsters than any other adult, Mrs.

Sheitel believes that she can help them work through some of their problems. She considered using bibliotherapy, as she sees value in using stories to stim ulate discussion concerning social is sues.

In exploring bibliotherapy research to learn of its effectiveness, she found the results to be generally positive. Schwartz (1977) supports the notion that literature helps children expand their viewpoint on certain social is sues. Caffee (1975) and Penna (1976)

reported improvement when reading was followed by discussion. Other

characteristics, however, including as sertiveness and self confidence, did not change as a result of bibliotherapy (Tillman, 1984; Schrank and Engels, 1981).

Mrs. Sheitel concluded that al

though personal characteristics may not change, students are sensitized to

certain issues through the bibliother

apy process, providing that discussion follows reading.

Fitting into classroom routine After examining the implementation of a bibliotherapy program, Mrs. Sheitel found that it required management techniques and resources unavailable to her. She therefore decided to modify these procedures and introduce a series of read aloud sessions with the entire class. In this way, she could hold half hour sessions twice weekly, or an hour session once a week, without disturb

ing her established program and her

daily routine. She decided to schedule these sessions in the afternoon before dismissal time for that reason.

Again, the purpose for this program was not to entertain pupils, but to use

carefully selected books as a catalyst for discussion in the hope of sensitiz

ing her pupils to current social con cerns and helping them seek solutions to their own problems.

Initial planning of the program in volved (1) informing and involving parents, (2) making book selections, and (3) reviewing each book and se

lecting passages to read aloud that would capture the pupils' attention and stimulate critical discussion.

Involving parents Since the program introduced contro versial topics, Mrs. Sheitel knew the

importance of involving parents, not

only to inform them of the program, but to encourage them to continue dis cussions on these selected topics at home.

Therefore, she wrote a brief letter to

parents explaining the purpose of her

program and why books on personal issues should be addressed in the class room. To encourage parents to con

tinue discussion at home, she included

Read aloud sessions: Tackling sensitive issues 875

This content downloaded from 91.223.28.163 on Sat, 28 Jun 2014 13:29:06 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

a booklist and approximate dates on

which specific topics would be intro duced.

Parents responded favorably to Mrs. Sheitel's letter with such comments as:

A good idea as long as these books are

read within a guided environment so

that sensitive interpretation is provided.

Great idea! We, as parents, should be

given a list of the books discussed in class so that we can add to the discus

sion at home.

Since our children are confronted with

these problems every day, I certainly ap

prove of discussions on these topics.

Making book selections To maximize student participation, the selection of books must be a joint ven ture. Pupils must have their say.

Mrs. Sheitel was fully aware of this and decided to take a vote on books to

be read and discussed. She selected 4 books on each of the following topics: (1) divorce, (2) problems with rela

tionships, and (3) overcoming handi

caps. She then briefly discussed the content of each and asked pupils to vote for 1 of the 4 books on each of the

topics. The books selected by the class

were: (1) Judy Blume's Its Not the End

of the World, a book about Karen's ad

justment to divorce; (2) Louise

Fitzhugh's Harriet the Spy, a book about conflicts with peers; and (3)

Armstrong Sperry's Call It Courage, the story of a teenage Polynesian boy

who is rejected by others for his handi

cap.

Once aware of having a say in what is read, the class eagerly began sug

gesting their own favorite books for the read aloud program. Judy Blume's books were suggested by a number of the 4th graders. These novels are par

ticularly popular, perhaps because the characters are so completely realistic and humor is so deftly woven into sen

sitive situations. To encourage their

enthusiasm, Mrs. Sheitel told the chil dren that they'd have a chance to intro

876 The Reading Teacher May 1987

duce their books after those on the list had been discussed.

The read aloud session Read aloud time is a special time. The

reader, like the storyteller, attempts to

captivate the group in a spirited, per haps dramatic way. The reader's voice

helps create the essential mood. To further capture attention, the

reader might open each session in a

unique way. Showing slides or trans

parencies of the story's illustrations or

using puppets to dramatize its intro duction always excites a group.

Basically, there are three steps to im

plementing the read aloud session:

(1) Previewing the story with the class to create interest in the character's problem.

(2) Selecting 2 or 3 passages from the story that reflect some aspect of the problem that the class will discuss.

(3) Stimulating open discussion on

each passage after reading.

In no instance were children pres

sured during discussion to relate their

personal experiences to the class, yet they were free to do so if they wished.

Previewing the divorce theme

Openended discussions are guided by a clearcut structure that leads the dis cussants from the story to life's appli cation. This structure can be likened to a pyramid. The pinnacle is the story's problem, followed by its application to

life, and finally it's application to one's

personal experience. Teachers may want to display such a pyramid to help a class visualize these stages. (See Fig ure.)

"Adjusting to divorce" was the first theme for discussion and Mrs. Sheitel

began the session by previewing It's Not the End of the World, the story of

13 year old Karen who senses that a di vorce is imminent but can never pre dict all the unknowns that she must

This content downloaded from 91.223.28.163 on Sat, 28 Jun 2014 13:29:06 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Visualization of the uses of story discussion

A Examine the story's situation Apply it to life

Apply it to oneself

face when the time arrives. The teach er's previewing objectives are to:

(1) capture the attention of the class

by drawing them into Karen's sit

uation,

(2) lead pupils to examine Karen's

problems, and

(3) apply her situation to problems that actually occur.

Mrs. Shekel attempted to draw pu pils into Karen's situation by stating: "Sometimes when we're really afraid that something like a divorce is going to happen, we do things to try to un

derstand the situation better. What Karen did was to write things that hap pened between her Mom and Dad in her diary. She thinks that this will help her understand things better. Let's lis ten to a passage from Karen's diary and think about what she writes and why she feels it's important to write it."

She read from the passage:

I try to be fair about my parents' fights. Tonight was definitely my mother's

fault. She should have been nicer to

Daddy when he came home. She

shouldn't have hollered when Amy spilled her milk, that can happen to any one. .. .The time Mom threw the cake on

the floor was Dad's fault. He started that one by saying that he hated mocha icing.

Reading a brief passage such as this is about all that is needed to introduce discussion on this issue.

Stimulating openended discussion Since the purpose of the read aloud session is to stimulate discussion on

critical issues, Mrs. Sheitel attempted to sensitize pupils to ways in which the

story's characters cope with their situa

tions, to examine why they acted as

they did, and to predict what we would do in a similar situation. She, there

fore, continued discussion on Karen's situation by leading the class to ana

lyze Karen's motives: "Why do you think it's important for Karen to write

things like this in her diary?" Steven said that Karen wants to be

fair. "She can't change anything, but at

least she doesn't want to hold a grudge against her Dad if the fight is her

Mom's fault."

Patsy stated: "Maybe Karen thinks about whose fault it is because if it's al

ways her mother's fault she can talk to

her Mom and try to stop her." Mrs. Sheitel led the conversation to

a more personal level by asking: "If

you were in Karen!s place do you think

talking to your Mom and Dad would

help? If so, what could you say?" The children had varied opinions.

Most said that they would talk to their

parents about the fighting, others said that they would be afraid to talk about it.

Some diverged from the question and began to discuss their feelings about their own situations. Shelly said that even though she missed her Dad a lot she was glad that there wasn't any

more fighting. Most agreed that going through a divorce with their parents

was tough, but that, in time, they "got used to" living with one parent.

Mrs. Sheitel said that it would be hard to talk to their parents about

fighting, but that it was important to know that the fighting usually was not the children's fault: "Many kids feel

guilty when parents fight and divorce, because they think it's their fault, but the fighting is almost always due to other reasons."

Mrs. Sheitel was not concerned when pupils diverged from the ques tions, since it was more important to

Read aloud sessions: Tackling sensitive issues 877

This content downloaded from 91.223.28.163 on Sat, 28 Jun 2014 13:29:06 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

tap the child's feelings and reactions than to have an intellectual discussion about the story itself. She continued the read aloud session by introducing a

passage about the feelings Karen expe rienced after the divorce occurred and led pupils to react to Karen's methods of coping.

She closed the session by encourag ing children to discuss their feelings about this topic or other situations with their parents.

Conclusion The difference between a read aloud session for therapeutic purposes and

simply reading aloud for entertainment lies in the focus of discussion. During the session Mrs. Shekel is more inter ested in having youngsters think

through today's critical problems than in motivating them to read.

Though this program should not be used as a form of therapy, the teacher

hopes to prepare pupils for what they might face and to become more sensi tive to those who are dealing with such

problems. Read aloud sessions are appropriate

at all grade levels, though themes dif

fer with concerns at different ages. By spurring youngsters to think more

deeply about critical issues, we are

providing them with the opportunity to think and react to situations that they

will undoubtedly face in their own

lives.

Sullivan teaches reading at Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Flor ida. She has also worked with a biblio

therapy program at the university's laboratory school.

References Bohning, Gerry. "Bibliotherapy: Fitting the Resources To

gether." Elementary School Journal, vol. 82 (November 1981), pp. 166-70.

Caffee, Claude E. "Bibliotherapy: Its Effectiveness on Self-Concept and Self-Actualization." Doctoral disser tation, East Texas State University, Commerce, Tex., 1975.

Futrell, Mary, and E. Fiske. "U.S. Schools Put New Stress on Teaching of Moral Values." The New York Times, September 15, 1986, p. 1.

Penna, Robert F. "The Relative Effectiveness of the Class room Discussion Approach and a Tutorial Approach to Literature for the Development of Adolescent Ego Identity." Doctoral dissertation, Fordham University,

New York, New York, 1976. Schrank, Frederick A., and Dennis W Engels. "Bibliother

apy as a Counseling Adjunct: Research Findings." The Personnel and Guidance Journal, vol. 60 (November 1981), pp. 143-47.

Schwartz, Sheila. "The Adolescent and Human Values." Humanist, vol. 37 (July-August 1977), pp. 17-21.

Tillman, Chester E. "Bibliotherapy for Adolescents: An An notated Research Review." Journal of Reading, vol. 27, (May 1984), pp. 713-18.

The Joplin Plan good for reading groups The Joplin Plan assigns students to regular graded classes for most of the

elementary school day but regroups them for reading across grade levels. For

example, a reading class at the 5th grade-1st semester reading level might in

clude high achieving 4th graders, average achieving 5th graders, and low

achieving 6th graders. The research finds consistent evidence that the Joplin Plan increases student reading achievement.

This contrasts with the best grouping for mathematics, where research

clearly supports the use of within-class ability groups, especially if only 2 or 3

groups are formed. The positive effects of within-class math groups are slightly greater for low achieving students than for average or high achievers.

CREMS Report, June 1986, p. 3. (Center for Research on Elementary and Middle Schools, The Johns Hopkins University, 3505 N. Charles St., Balti

more, MA 21218, USA).

878 The Reading Teacher May 1987

This content downloaded from 91.223.28.163 on Sat, 28 Jun 2014 13:29:06 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions


Recommended