© 2017 Miller Johnson. All rights reserved. 1
Rebecca Strauss
The materials and information have beenprepared for informational purposes only.This is not legal advice, nor intended to create orconstitute a lawyer-client relationship.Before acting on the basis of any information ormaterial, readers who have specific questions orproblems should consult their lawyer.
2
© 2017 Miller Johnson. All rights reserved. 2
What is it?Non-physical aggression: Aggression, intimidation,
harassment, or other threatening behavior
Violent conduct: Violent conduct (murder, assault,robbery, sexual assault) occurring at work or onduty
3
Who commits it? Employees (victims are co-workers, or customers)
Customers (and patients)
Strangers
Relatives (or boyfriends/girlfriends) of employees
4
© 2017 Miller Johnson. All rights reserved. 3
Orlando, Florida – June 6, 2017
5
Hesston, Kansas – February 25, 2016
6
© 2017 Miller Johnson. All rights reserved. 4
San Bernardino, CA – December 2, 2015
7
Kalamazoo, MI – February 20, 2016
8
© 2017 Miller Johnson. All rights reserved. 5
People are generally safer at work than awayfrom work
Despite increased media visibility, workplaceviolence occurs less frequently today than adecade ago 1994: 1080 workplace homicides
2011: 468 workplace homicides
9
Domestic violence as workplace violence 20% of workplace violence directed towards
women is perpetrated by an employee’s spouse,partner, or someone the employee knows who isnot a co-worker
For men, the rate is 13%
10
© 2017 Miller Johnson. All rights reserved. 6
MIOSHA standards
Workplace violence policies
Weapons policies
Background checks
Negligent hiring
Early indicators – what can you do withoutviolating the ADA
11
MIOSHA addresses Workplace Violence underthe “General Duty” Clause which requiresemployers to provide their workers with aworkplace “free from recognized hazards thatare causing or likely to cause death or seriousphysical harm”
“Workplace violence is recognized as anoccupational hazard in some industries andenvironments which, like other safety issues,can be avoided or minimized if employerstake appropriate precautions.”
12
© 2017 Miller Johnson. All rights reserved. 7
“OSHA believes that a well written andimplemented Workplace Violence PreventionProgram, combined with engineeringcontrols, administrative controls, and trainingcan reduce the incidence of workplaceviolence in both the private sector andFederal workplaces.” OSHA (adopted byMIOSHA)
13
14
Essential elementsDefine what type of conduct is prohibited
Describe consequences
Encourage employees to report concerns
Instruct employees who they should contact
© 2017 Miller Johnson. All rights reserved. 8
What is prohibited? Physical contact
Other conduct
Threatening
Intimidating
Harassing
Prohibit conduct even if employee claims conduct isa “joke” or just “horseplay”
Policy applies to employees, as well as any personwho is on the premises
15
What gets reported? Overt or subtle threats
Physical or verbal intimidation
Stalking/surveillance of others
Expressions of violent plans or intent
Violent conduct
Threats of violence by acquaintances (includingdomestic violence) that employee believes could occurat work
16
© 2017 Miller Johnson. All rights reserved. 9
To whom is it reported? If there is a threat of imminent harm, call 911 or
employer security officer If the violence or threat does not create an
immediate threat of harm, Report to supervisor and human resources Human resources can escalate up the chain of
command if necessary
Human resources keeps log of incidents so that itcan determine if it should take action to preventreoccurrences Explain consequences of violating the policy
17
18
Past and Present Future?
© 2017 Miller Johnson. All rights reserved. 10
“You’ve got to ask yourself one question…”
19
If your organization decides to PROHIBITweapons in the workplace: You are probably among the vast majority of
employers
Zero-tolerance approach to employee-carrying ismost common
Does policy apply to customers/visitors?
Beware: Parking lot laws
MI – no “parking lot” employer restriction
IN, IL – most employers may not lawfully prohibitemployees from keeping a weapon in a locked cartrunk or glove box, even in a parking lot
20
© 2017 Miller Johnson. All rights reserved. 11
If your organization decides to ALLOWweapons in the workplace: You need to start with a clear written policy
Recommendation: Only licensed employees may carry
Recommendation: Employees may carry onlyregistered firearms
Consult an attorney!
Review other employee policies carefully to preventconflicts
Threat escalation?
Weapons possession?
21
22
Certain employers may not lawfully allowconcealed carry on premises, including:Child care/day care centers
Arenas
Bars
May need to alert workers’ compensationcarrier
Third-party liability – consider carefully
© 2017 Miller Johnson. All rights reserved. 12
You work as the HR manager for a residentialbuilder
Your company has an opening for a generallaborer. You conduct a background checkand notice that he had served time in prisonfor a violent felony. Believing in givingpeople second chances, you hire him.
A subcontractor arrives at a subdivision’smodel home to meet with one of yourexecutives, who takes her meetings there
23
Without warning or provocation, a generallaborer, employed by your company, viciouslyattacks the subcontractor. The employee waslater committed to a mental institution.
The subcontractor sues your company fornegligent hiring or retaining based on youractual knowledge of employee’s violenttendencies, or failure to be reasonablydiligent in ascertaining the employee’s violenttendencies.
24
© 2017 Miller Johnson. All rights reserved. 13
Was the background check legal?
Should you have decided not to hire thegeneral laborer when you saw the felonyconviction?
25
26
© 2017 Miller Johnson. All rights reserved. 14
27
Federal law (Title VII)
Does not directly address employer use ofcriminal records
Does protect employees in protected categoriesfrom “disparate impact” discrimination
The EEOC has taken the position that Title VII’sdisparate impact protections can, in some cases,make consideration of an applicant’s criminalbackground unlawful
28
EEOC’s solution: A targeted or individual-ized exclusion that considers three factors:
1. The nature and gravity of the offense
What harm was caused?
What were the elements of the crime?
2. The time that has passed
3. The nature of the job
Not just the title, but the duties
Also consider the environment in which the job isperformed
© 2017 Miller Johnson. All rights reserved. 15
29
Michigan law (Elliott-Larsen)
Directly addresses employer use ofcriminal records
Employers are prohibited from taking adverseaction against any employee or applicant foremployment due to the individual’s misdemeanorarrest record
Can discriminate on the basis of convictions andpending felony charges
The General Rule
An employer must use “reasonable care”to avoid selecting or retaining anemployee who it knows or should haveknown, based on past acts, had a violentor vicious nature which was likely toresult in injury to someone
30
© 2017 Miller Johnson. All rights reserved. 16
Nature of the employee’s position: Will the employee have one-on-one contact with
customers or other members of the public? Does the employer’s business involve caring for others
or others’ property?
Conduct which might indicate a propensity towardviolence Does the employee have a criminal background? What
is the charge? Has the employee displayed violent conduct at work? Has the employee made specific threats? Has the employee made rude or vulgar comments?
31
Jury decided that the employer should haveknown of the general laborer’s violencepropensity.
Michigan Supreme Court said “the mere factthat a person has a criminal record, even aconviction for a crime of violence, does not initself establish the fact that the person has aviolent or vicious nature so that an employerwould be negligent in hiring him to meet thepublic.”
32
© 2017 Miller Johnson. All rights reserved. 17
An employee reports to you that a co-workerin the cubicle next door has been actingstrange, depressed, and erratic.
He is prone to seemingly unprovoked angryoutbursts that include profanity directedtowards co-workers.
His behavior makes the co-workeruncomfortable and she thinks “he might
have a mental health problem.”
33
Remember - the ADA (and Michigan’sPWDCRA) prohibits discrimination against,and requires employers to providereasonable accommodations to qualifiedindividuals with disabilities Situations like this one typically become
mishandled in one of three ways…
34
© 2017 Miller Johnson. All rights reserved. 18
Employee sends a text message to hissupervisor telling the supervisor that she“better watch her back” and that he “won’tput up with her bullsh**.”
When you speak with the employee, heapologizes and explains that he has beendiagnosed with an anger disorder that causeshim to quickly lose his temper and say thingsthat he does not mean.
Can you still discipline the employee?
35
Error #1: Failing to discharge an employeefor violating a workplace conduct rulebecause he or she has revealed a mentaldisability or impairment
Remember the key – you can always discipline ordischarge for misconduct, even if that misconducthas been caused by a disability
36
© 2017 Miller Johnson. All rights reserved. 19
Regarding the employee who sent the textmessage ...Are there grounds for an IME?
Can he effectively perform his job functions?
Sales representative
Receptionist
Physician assistant
Accountant
Should you continue to allow him to
work with the supervisor?
37
Error #2: Jumping the gun towards an IME
Under the ADA, a current employee may beordered to undergo an independent medicalexamination for reasons that are both job relatedand consistent with business necessity
38
© 2017 Miller Johnson. All rights reserved. 20
One of your employees takes days off to recoverfrom a suicide attempt, which occurred at work.The employee reported that she was distraughtabout working with her ex-boyfriend.
After only a few days, employee is released to returnto work. Her ex-boyfriend still works there.
The manager is concerned about allowing her toreturn to work. Is there anything you can do?
39
Error #3: Misapplying the “direct threat”analysisUnder the ADA, an employer may lawfully exclude
an individual from employment for safety reasonsonly if the employer can show that employment ofthe individual would pose a “direct threat” tohim/herself or others that cannot be eliminated orreduced by a reasonable accommodation “Direct threat” is a significant risk or substantial
harmMust make individualized assessment of the
individual’s present ability to safely perform thejob, considering most current medical knowledgeand/or best available objective evidence
40
© 2017 Miller Johnson. All rights reserved. 21
Analysis for medical examination under theADA Job-related and consistent with business necessity
Is there legitimate concern that the employeeis unable to perform essential job functions?
Is there legitimate concern that the employeemight be a direct threat to herself or others?How do you obtain that information?
If employee is taken off work, is it FMLAleave?
41
An employee submits a FMLA certificationform stating a need for intermittent leave dueto bi-polar disorder and schizophrenia.
In the section of the FMLA certification formaddressing essential job functions, theemployee’s provider states: “When employee is having a flare-up, employee’s
judgment and reasoning is compromised. It couldbe unsafe for employee to be around others,especially employee’s supervisor.”
42
© 2017 Miller Johnson. All rights reserved. 22
Is there sufficient information to take theemployee off work?
Is there sufficient information for a fitnessfor duty exam?
What about the FMLA leave?
43
44
Rebecca L. [email protected]
100 W Michigan AveSuite 200Kalamazoo, MI 49007
45 Ottawa Ave SWSuite 1100Grand Rapids, MI 49503
millerjohnson.com