*Represents a sample of GMA members
GMA Member Companies
General Members
Associate Members
Overview
• Recalls and you
• Recall preparation
Legal requirements vs best in class
• Recall execution
Real life vs mock recalls
• Communication
Internal
External
Case studies
Outside of Scope
• Legal aspects of a recall
Go to Shawn Stevens’ session tomorrow at 11:30
Question
How many of you grow, harvest, pack, process,
manufacture, store or distribute food?
Have you ever been involved in a recall?
If not, what is the likelihood that you might be in the next 5
years?
Do you have recall insurance?
2014 USDA recallsRecall Summary for Calendar Year 2014
Total
Number of
Recalls
Number of
Pounds
Recalled
94 18,675,102
Recalls by Class (N=94)
Class I 63 14,261,888
II 23 3,817,387
III 8 595,827
Recall by Species/Product (N=94)
Species Beef 22 13,232,176
Mixed 14 2,151,495
Pork 26 1,032,582
Poultry*** 31 2,230,901
Ovine 1 27,948
http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-summaries
USDA notable recalls Recalls by Reason (N=94)Reason For
RecallSTEC* 5 1,840,533
Listeria
monocytoge
nes
7 270,926
Salmonella 4 372,414
Undeclared
Allergen43 6,147,288
Extraneous
Material6 265,607
Processing
Defect4 59,203
Undeclared
Substance2 80,084
Other** 23 9,639,047
• 8.7 m lb beef- lack
of inspection
• 1.8 m lb gr beef E.
coli contamination
FDA regulated food products
• >400 recalls in 2014
Table 1: Comparison of Years 1, 2, 3 and 4 RFR
Total Submissions and Entries Report Category
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
Total Entries 2240 882 1095 1269
Primary (Industry and Voluntary) Entries
229 225 224 202
Subsequent Entries (Upstream and Downstream)
1872 483 609 849
Even if you didn’t
cause the issue,
it can still impact
you!
Future Recall Trends
• More recalls
Science and epidemiology continues to get better
Whole Genome Sequencing
Media continue to focus on food issues
There will be more “recall-able” events due to more regulations- the “bar” to recall a product may be lower
Supplier control
Allergens/ gluten
Heavy metals
Long term health consequences
This does not mean food will be less safe!!!
What it does mean
Be prepared!
Have a recall plan
Know how to use it
Make sure it works in real life
What MUST a
recall plan address
(USDA)?• How the establishment
will decide whether to recall the product
• How to effect the recall
• Consider
• Recall team
• Scope
• Records
• Communication
• Public notification
• Effectiveness checks
• Disposition
• Recall simulations
Proposed FDA recall
plan requirements
• Directly notify
consignees
• How to dispose of
the food
• Notify the public
• Effectiveness
checks
• Notifying FDA of a
reportable food
• No current proposed
mock recall
requirements
Recall Plan Ingredients
• Recall Team identification
• Decision making process/ roles
and responsibilities
• Templates
Press releases
FAQs
Customer letters
Agency communications
• Checklists
Recall action items
Meeting logs
• Contact lists (up to date!!)
Internal
External
Govt contacts
Insurance company
Laboratory
Attorney
PR firm
Call center
What else?
• WHO
Leadership
Internal & external
resources
Roles & responsibilities
• HOW
Incident evaluation
Customer knowledge
• WHAT
Records
Systems
Communications
Recall Plan Offshoots
• Traceability– your traceability program is not your recall
plan!
• Regulatory inspection policy
Do you allow photographs?
Do you take duplicate samples?
Traceback vs recallTraceback Recall
Regulator –driven Industry-driven
Supply chain wide 1 forward/back
Scope of issue unknown Known issue
Trying to find common source Locating known product
Hard to determine Easy to test
The steps of a recall
1. Notification of a potential issue
2. Health hazard evaluation, scope determination
3. Recall?? Strategy
4. Execution
5. Termination
1. How will you know?
• Government Authorities
Tested product, outbreak investigation
• Media
• Malicious threat
Food defense issues are different
• Consumer/ Customer complaints
What is critical vs not?
How are they tracked and escalated?
• Internal discovery
• Supplier notification
Foreign Objects: “I found
something that should not
have been in my product!”
- Might involve an injury
(usually a dental or mouth injury)
Illness Claims: “Your
product made me sick!”
- Typically last product used
before illness symptoms surfaced
- Often consumer noticed
off-flavor, but ate/drank product
anyways
Defective Containers: “I
hurt myself opening your
product!” or “Your product
leaked and caused
property damage!”
2. Is it dangerous?
• Health hazard evaluation Likelihood and severity
Description of the issue
Number of complaints/ # ill or injured
Short and/or long term health consequences given the level of the hazard
At-risk populations
Public health impact
L. monocytogenes on an apple vs pesticide residue above legal limit on an apple
Do you recall?
• Regulatory violation
• Public health risk
• Brand risk
• Even if you don’t recall, it doesn’t mean the issue is over
Do you recall?
Make the decision before hand!
Anticipate the types of contaminants/ levels/
situations
Sketch out how various situations would be
handled
Have them pre-approved
Takes the pressure off, reduces uncertainty
and confusion, and saves time in a real event
Scope
• How do you know when the issue occurred?
• How do you know you’ve fixed the problem?
Records:
• Production logs
• Sanitation logs
• Maintenance records
• Pre-op inspection forms
• Test results
Real Life #1
Company A ships a RTE product to a co-man for Company B. The co-man chops/crumbles and repackages.
Finished product testing found the product was positive for non-pathogenic Listeria species.
Is this a problem?
Questions:
Did they test incoming product?
Did they have a strong environmental monitoring program?
How do you determine scope?
Does the product support growth?
Later found LM in zone 3
$200K product
Go to
Warren
Stone’s
session
3. Recall strategy
• It depends!
• What happened?
• What is the health risk?
• How much product was impacted, and where is it now?
• Messaging to communicate these issues
• Who makes the decision on the recall strategy?
• (and to reiterate, better to think through “likely” situations in
advance)
Real Life #2
Company J sends ingredients to co-man that are labeled with a “may contain” allergen statement
Company J is an approved supplier of “The Brand”. “The Brand” has audited Company J and found their allergen control to be exceptional. So they don’t have a “may contain” statement on their product,
being produced by the co-man
One day the co-man tested the ingredient. It was positive for an allergen. The Brand also tested the ingredient. It was negative for the allergen. Finished product was already in distribution
Is a recall needed? Who decides?
End result: recall announced 3.5 weeks later
Handling Recalled Product
Based on the hazard, amount of product, practical considerations including cost
• Destroy/ denature in the field (need proof)
• Ship to central location for reconciliation
• Re-label, rework, etc
• Who will be responsible?
• How will you verify these actions were taken?
• What if it’s a food defense issue?
4. Execution: pulling the
trigger
• Clear roles and responsibilities
• Clear decision making process
• Accurate and timely communications
• Great documentation
5. Termination
• Documentation is complete
• Effectiveness is verified
• Root cause is identified
Corrective actions in place
• Consumers are safe- product is out of the market
• Internal after action assessment is complete
Communication
"The two words information and communication are often used interchangeably, but they signify quite different things.
Information is giving out; communication is getting through."
- Sydney Harris
Communicating during a
crisis Your
employees
Regulators
Media
The publicCustomers
Shareholders
Questions
Is anyone the spokesperson for their company?
Has anyone had media training?
Does anyone have a neighbor?
Communication 101
• Communicate BEFORE
Establish relationships
Promote an understanding of the process
• Communicate DURING
What you know
What you don’t know
What you’re doing to find out
When you’ll be back in touch
• Communicate AFTER
What you’ve done to ensure it won’t happen again
Food Safety Landmarks
• 1982 Tylenol
• 1996 Apple juice
• 2006 Spinach
• 2009 PCA peanut products
• 2011 Cantaloupe
• 2014 Foster Farms
1982 Tylenol
• 7 deaths- cyanide
• J&J was a victim
Offered a reward
• Tamper evident packaging
1996 Apple Juice
• One child died; 60 people sickened with E. coli O157:H7
• > 20 personal injury lawsuits
• Stock price dropped 34%
• 90% reduction in sales
• Recall- direct costs $6.5 M
• Criminal fine $1.5 M
• Flash pasteurization
• “Best Brand Name in the Bay Area” one year later by San Francisco Magazine
2006 Spinach
• 3 deaths, 205 ill w E. coli O157:H7
• “Natural Selections” brand sales fell 30%
• 1 year later industry sales were at 85% of pre-outbreak
levels
• Earthbound Farm
Led industry best practice leafy greens marketing
agreement and more
Very visible food safety person
2009 PCA
9 deaths, 714 ill; Salmonella
Knowingly released contaminated product
4 company officials charged
Feb 2009 filed for bankruptcy
2011 Jensen Farms
Cantaloupe
30 deaths, 146 cases Listeria monocytogenes
Very poor food safety practices
2012 filed for bankruptcy
Owners pled guilty to criminal charges
But sued the auditor for giving a good rating
2014 Foster Farms
2 Salmonella outbreaks
March 2013-July 2014
Almost 650 people confirmed ill
Recall issued July 3, 2014
Salmonella is not an adulterant; no regulatory violation
Keys to Survival
• Do the right thing
• Even when people aren’t looking
• Easier to forgive the “good guys”
• Put a face to your food safety efforts
• Communicate, communicate, communicate
Show compassion and concern
Most people aren’t scientists
Logic, facts, and regulations don’t matter
• Acknowledge shortcomings and demonstrate leadership and improvement
Conclusion
• Recalls will continue to happen
• Outbreaks will continue to happen
• Do all you can to avoid this!
• Be prepared for it to happen
• You determine the fate of your company
Thank you!
Questions?
44