+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Received on April 3, 2016 Accepted on June 5,...

Received on April 3, 2016 Accepted on June 5,...

Date post: 16-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: vuonglien
View: 215 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
12
Jordan Journal of Chemistry Vol. 11 No.2, 2016, pp. 108-119 108 JJC Salvia ceratophylla from Jordan: Volatile Organic Compounds, Essential oil composition and antioxidant activity Hala I. Al Jaber Department of Physics and Basic Sciences, Faculty of Engineering Technology, Al-Balqa Applied University, Amman, Jordan Received on April 3, 2016 Accepted on June 5, 2016 Abstract This work aimed at evaluating the chemical composition of the hydro-distilled essential oils of fresh and air-dried Salvia ceratophylla growing wild in Jordan by GC/MS in addition to evaluating the actual composition of the volatile organic compounds (VOC’s) extracted by SPME (Solid Phase Micro-Extraction) of S. certaphylla fresh roots and flowers at the pre-, full and post- flowering stages. Different classes of terpenoids at varying concentrations were detected. The hydro-distilled oil of fresh flowers was dominated by sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (27.26%) while the air dried flowers contained oxygenated monoterpenes as the main constituents (58.28%). The VOC’s profile of the roots and the flowers during the pre-, full and post-flowering stages contained monoterpene hydrocarbons as the main constituents (60.14%; 80.49%; 92.28%; 59.66%, respectively). In addition, the hydro-alcoholic extracts obtained from the aerial flowering parts of S. ceratophylla showed interesting antioxidant activity on ABTS •+ assay (IC50=0.09 (mg/mL) ± 2.91) as compared to that of the DPPH assay (IC50=0.11 (mg/mL) ± 1.85). Keywords: Salvia ceratophylla; Essential oil; GC/MS; SPME; Terpenoids; Antioxidant activity. Introduction The genus Salvia belongs to the mentheae tribe within the Nepetoideae subfamily of the family Lamiaceae (formerly referred to as Labiateae). [1] This genus, represented by more than 1000 species distributed worldwide, is considered as the most important genus of the Lamiaceae family. Plants belonging to this family are generally recognized for their various pharmacological properties including analgesic, anti-inflammatory, [2] antioxidant, antibacterial, [3] anti-tumoral and central nervous system depressant activities. [4] The flora of Jordan includes about 19 species of the genus Salvia. [5] Generally, Salvia plants are used as herbal remedies for the treatment of many ailments, including abdominal pain, fever and bronchitis. Many species belonging to this genus are known for their carminative, spasmolytic and antibacterial activities. Also, Corresponding author: e-mail: [email protected]
Transcript

Jordan Journal of Chemistry Vol. 11 No.2, 2016, pp. 108-119

108

JJC

Salvia ceratophylla from Jordan: Volatile Organic Compounds, Essential oil composition and antioxidant activity

Hala I. Al Jaber

Department of Physics and Basic Sciences, Faculty of Engineering Technology, Al-Balqa Applied University, Amman, Jordan

Received on April 3, 2016 Accepted on June 5, 2016

Abstract This work aimed at evaluating the chemical composition of the hydro-distilled essential

oils of fresh and air-dried Salvia ceratophylla growing wild in Jordan by GC/MS in addition to

evaluating the actual composition of the volatile organic compounds (VOC’s) extracted by SPME

(Solid Phase Micro-Extraction) of S. certaphylla fresh roots and flowers at the pre-, full and post-

flowering stages. Different classes of terpenoids at varying concentrations were detected. The

hydro-distilled oil of fresh flowers was dominated by sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (27.26%) while

the air dried flowers contained oxygenated monoterpenes as the main constituents (58.28%).

The VOC’s profile of the roots and the flowers during the pre-, full and post-flowering stages

contained monoterpene hydrocarbons as the main constituents (60.14%; 80.49%; 92.28%;

59.66%, respectively). In addition, the hydro-alcoholic extracts obtained from the aerial flowering

parts of S. ceratophylla showed interesting antioxidant activity on ABTS•+ assay (IC50=0.09

(mg/mL) ± 2.91) as compared to that of the DPPH assay (IC50=0.11 (mg/mL) ± 1.85).

Keywords: Salvia ceratophylla; Essential oil; GC/MS; SPME; Terpenoids; Antioxidant

activity.

Introduction The genus Salvia belongs to the mentheae tribe within the Nepetoideae

subfamily of the family Lamiaceae (formerly referred to as Labiateae).[1] This genus,

represented by more than 1000 species distributed worldwide, is considered as the

most important genus of the Lamiaceae family. Plants belonging to this family are

generally recognized for their various pharmacological properties including analgesic,

anti-inflammatory,[2] antioxidant, antibacterial,[3] anti-tumoral and central nervous

system depressant activities.[4]

The flora of Jordan includes about 19 species of the genus Salvia.[5] Generally,

Salvia plants are used as herbal remedies for the treatment of many ailments,

including abdominal pain, fever and bronchitis. Many species belonging to this genus

are known for their carminative, spasmolytic and antibacterial activities. Also,

Corresponding author: e-mail: [email protected]

109

decoctions prepared from different Salvia species are used as gargle or mouthwash

against mouth and throat inflammation. Many plants of this important genus are used

as wound-healing agents, in cosmetics for skin and hair care, as well as against

rheumatism. Moreover, the use of plants belonging to this genus as antitumor and

anticholinesterase agents has been reported. Examples include the use of S. virgate in

Western Turkey for the treatment of skin diseases and against blood cancer.[6]

Salvia ceratophylla is a perennial herb; 20-50 cm long, erect, its branches are

soft, green purple with soft dense hairs. The plant has basal leaves rosette, 5-20 cm

long, sessile, oblong, pinnatified with white woolly hairs. Flowers are lemon-yellow in

color and about 1.5 cm long.[7] In Jordan, the plant is known to grow wild in the waste

lands and along road sides of different places extending from the North (Irbid, Mafraq),

Middle (the capital Amman) to the South, including Tafila, Shaubak, Petra and Ma’an.

Flowering occurs in the spring during the period extending from April to June.[7]

Previous investigations were concerned with the identification of the chemical

constituents from the plant of Turkish origin.[8, 9] The acetone extract of S. ceratophylla

roots afforded six diterpenoids two of which were novel, including ursolic acid,

oleanolic acid and -sitosterol in addition to salvigenin.[8] Recently, the variation of the

volatile constituents obtained from the air dried aerial parts of S. ceratophylla collected

from different locations in Turkey has been investigated.[9] It is worth mentioning that

only dried plant material has been assayed for essential oil composition, the chemical

constituents of the essential oil obtained from fresh plant material have never been

investigated before.

In a continuation of an extensive effort aiming at investigating the volatile and

non-volatile composition of Salvia plants grwoing wild in Jordan, the present work

aimed at evaluating of the chemical composition of the hydro-distilled oil obtained from

fresh and air-dried aerial flowering parts of S. ceratophylla growing wild in Jordan and

comparing the findings of the current investigation with those in Turkey and other

regions of the world. Prior to the present study, the actual composition of the Volatile

Organic Compounds (VOC’s) extracted by SPME method from S. ceratohpylla roots

and flowers at the pre-, full and post flowering stages has never been investigated. In

addition, the antioxidant activity of the hydro-alcoholic extract obtained from the air

dried aerial parts of S. ceratophylla was also evaluated using the DPPH• and ATBS•+

assay methods.

Experimental

Materials and Methods

General

n-Hexane (GC-grade) and analytical reagent grade anhydrous sodium sulphate

(Na2SO4) were purchased from Scharlau (Barcelona, Spain) and Analar (UK),

110

respectively. Authentic oil components including the pinene isomers (α- and β),

limonene, linalool, borneol, p-cymene, (Fluka) eugenol, sabinene hydrate (Sigma-

Aldrich) were used as reference substances in GC/MS analysis.

Plant material

S. ceratophylla L. was collected from Abu-Hamid village at Abu-Nseir region,

located about 15 km to the north of the capital Amman, Jordan, during its full flowering

period (March – April, 2015). The identity of the plant was confirmed by Prof. Dr.

Barakat E. Abu-Irmaileh, Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, The

University of Jordan. A voucher specimen (No: BAU/03/LS1003) has been kept in the

Department of Physics and Basic Sciences, Faculty of Engineering Technology, Al-

Balqa Applied University, Marka-Amman, Jordan. The plant material, was air dried in

shade until constant weight was achieved, and then subsequently assayed for

chemical and antioxidant activity evaluation.

Hydro-distillation and Solid Phase Micro-Extraction (SPME) of the volatile constituents

from S. ceratophylla and preparation of the hydroalcoholic extracts

The two experiments were performed according to the procedure described in

the literature.[10, 11] The extractions and analytical experiments were repeated twice.

For the preparation of hydroalcoholic extracts, a 10 g sample of plant material

was refluxed in 100 ml of solvent (70% ethanol-water (v/v)). The solvent was then

evaporated affording 1.2 g residue that was then assayed for its antioxidant activity.

GC/MS and GC/FID analysis

Quantitative analysis of the essential oil constituents was performed according

to the procedure mentioned in the literature.[11] The instrument used was Hewlett-

Packard HP-8590 gas chromatograph equipped with a Flame Ionization Detector

(FID). Split-splitless injector (split ratio 1:50) and an optima-5 fused silica capillary

column (30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 film thickness) was used. The temperatures of the

injector and detector were maintained at 250 ºC and 300º C, respectively. The analysis

of the essential oils was performed under linear temperature conditions, the

temperature was programmed from 60 ºC to 250 ºC at a rate of 10 ºC/min, the

temperature was then held constant at 250 ºC for 5 min. In the analysis of the hydro-

distilled volatile oils obtained from fresh and dried aerial parts of S. ceratophylla, the

relative peak area of each component of the oil was measured. The relative peak

areas of the oil components were used for the concentration calculation of the detected

compounds. Gas chromatography -Mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis of the essential oil

was performed on a Varian chrompack CP-3800 GC/MS/MS-200 (Saturn,

Netherlands) GC/MS equipped with DB-5 (5% diphenyl, 95% dimethyl polysiloxane)

GC capillary column (30 m ×0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 μm film thicknesses), using a sample of

111

about 1 μL of each oil diluted in GC grade n-hexane. The temperature of the MS

source reached approximately 180 ºC and the ionization voltage was 70 eV. The

column was kept at 60 ºC for 1 min (isothermal). The temperature was then ramped to

246 ºC at a rate of 3 ºC/min and kept constant at 246 ºC for 3 minutes (isothermal).

Helium was used as a carrier gas at a flow rate of 0.9 ml/min. A homologous C8-C20 n-

alkanes hydrocarbon mixture was analyzed separately by GC/MS under the same

chromatographic conditions using the same DB-5 column.

The components of the essential oil were identified using built in libraries (Nist

Co and Wiley Co, USA) and by comparing their calculated retention indices relative to

the homologous C8-C20 n-alkanes hydrocarbon mixture, with their literature values

measured with columns of identical polarity[12] or with authentic samples.

DPPH• scavenging Activity Assay

The radical scavenging capacity of the hydro-alcoholic extract obtained from the

air dried S. ceratophylla was determined and compared to the values obtained for the

positive controls, ascorbic acid and α-tocopherol, based on the procedure listed in the

literature for their reaction with 2,2-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH•).[13] Briefly,

a solution of DPPH• (0.1 mM) was prepared in methanol and 1.0 mL sample of various

concentrations (0.005 - 0.600 mg/mL) of the hydroalcoholic extract in methanol was

added to 2 mL of the DPPH• solution. The solutions were allowed to stand at room

temperature in the dark for 30 min, then their absorbances were measured at 517 nm

(against blank samples) using a UV-visible spectrophotometer. All determinations were

performed in triplicate. The ability to scavenge the DPPH• was calculated using the

following equation:

퐷푃푃퐻• 푟푎푑푖푐푎푙 푠푐푎푣푒푛푔푖푛푔 푎푐푡푖푣푖푡푦 = 퐴 − 퐴

퐴 × 100%

The antioxidant activity was expressed as IC50, which was defined as the

concentration (in mg/mL) of extract required to inhibit the formation of DPPH radicals

by 50%.

ABTS•+ scavenging Activity Assay

The total antioxidant activity was determined by 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzo-

thiazoline-6-sulphonic acid radical cation (ABTS•+) decolorization assay according to

the method described by Re et al (1999)[14] with some modifications. The ABTS•+

solution was prepared by combining equal amounts of 7 mM of ABTS•+ and 2.4 mM of

potassium persulfate (K2S2O8) solution which were allowed to react for 16 hour at room

temperature in the dark. Before use, this solution was diluted with methanol to get an

absorbance of 0.75 ± 0.02 at 734 nm. The reaction mixture comprised 3 mL of ABTS•+

solution and 1 mL of the hydro-alcoholic extract at various concentrations (0.005 -

0.600 mg/mL). The absorbance of the resulting mixture was measured at 734 nm

using UV- visible spectrophotometer. The blank was run in each assay and all

112

measurements were done after at least 5 min. Ascorbic acid and α- tocopherol were

used as positive controls. The percentage inhibition was calculated according to the

equation:

퐴퐵푇푆 푟푎푑푖푐푎푙 푠푐푎푣푒푛푔푖푛푔 푎푐푡푖푣푖푡푦 = 퐴 − 퐴

퐴 × 100%

The ABTS•+ scavenging ability was expressed as IC50 (mg/mL).

Results and Discussion Hydro-distillation of the fresh and air dried aerial flowering parts of S.

ceratophylla afforded pale yellow oil with a yield of 0.5% and 0.1% (w/w, fresh and dry,

respectively). In total, 43 components were identified in the oil obtained from the fresh

plant material amounting to 94.53% of the total oil content (Table 1). This oil was

dominated by 10 sesquiterpene hydrocarbons, of which germacrene D had the main

contribution (18.10%). The second major compound detected in the essential oil of the

fresh plant was the monoterpene hydrocarbon limonene, which amounted to 17.75% of

the total oil content. Other classes of terpenoids were detected in appreciable amounts

including oxygenated monoterpenes (9.73%), oxygenated sesquiterpenes (8.50%),

diterpene hydrocarbons (0.75%), oxygenated diterpenes (1.66%) and phenyl-

propanoids (1.54%). Moreover, several aliphatic hydrocarbons, aldehydes, ketones

and esters were detected in the essential oil obtained from the fresh plant, amounting

in total to 24.60% of the total oil content.

Table 1: Chemical composition of the hydro-distilled oil of fresh and air dried flowering parts and SPME volatile components of the roots and flowers at different flowering stages of S. ceratophylla growing wild in Jordan.

Hydro-distillation SPME

No RI a RI b Compound SC1 SC2 SC3 SC4 SC5 SC6 Monoterpene hydrocarbons 20.49 0.48 89.49 92.28 59.66 60.14 1 906 908 santolina triene - - 1.44 1.64 1.08 - 2 924 922 thujene - - 40.61 40.92 35.29 3.42 3 939 935 -pinene 1.44 - 7.96 7.42 6.33 24.94 4 946 947 camphene - - - - - 7.59 5 975 965 sabinene - - 4.44 6.21 7.75 0.71 6 979 981 -pinene 1.30 - 29.32 29.93 3.27 22.93 7 991 986 -myrecene - - - 0.60 0.88 - 8 1003 1008 -phellandrene - - 0.18 0.18 - - 9 1014 1014 -terpinene - - 0.40 0.37 - - 10 1029 1031 limonene 17.75 0.48 4.09 4.01 4.48 0.43 11 1054 1054 -terpinene - - 0.73 0.70 0.58 0.12 12 1089 1085 terpinolene - - 0.32 0.30 - - Oxygenated monoterpenes 9.73 58.28 1.72 0.57 1.55 0.37

13 1073 1072 trans-linalool oxide - 0.71 - - - - 14 1087 1089 cis-linalool oxide - 0.88 - - - - 15 1097 1104 linalool - 55.55 - - - -

16 1123 1125 trans-p-mentha-2,8-dien-1-ol 1.15 - - - - -

17 1134 1136 1-terpineol - - 0.69 - - -

113

Hydro-distillation SPME

No RI a RI b Compound SC1 SC2 SC3 SC4 SC5 SC6 18 1142 1140 cis-limonene oxide 2.05 - 0.20 - - - 19 1141 1143 camphor - - - - - 0.18 20 1169 1169 borneol 0.93 - - - - 0.19 21 1177 1184 terpinen-4-ol 0.53 - - - - - 22 1189 1199 terpineol - 0.68 - - - - 23 1208 1204 trans-piperitol 1.19 - - - - - 24 1217 1223 trans-carveol 0.65 - - - - - 25 1239 1232 isobornyl formate 0.44 - 0.83 0.57 1.55 - 26 1253 1245 geraniol - 0.46 - - - - 27 1290 1295 limonene-10-ol 0.43 - - - - - 28 1434 1436 isobornyl isobutanoate 2.36 - - - - - Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons 27.26 10.81 7.30 4.34 17.01 36.45

30 1351 1344 cubebene - - 0.33 0.20 0.63 1.08 31 1377 1377 -copaene 0.53 0.90 1.14 0.73 2.57 0.25 32 1388 1380 bourbonene - - 0.21 0.17 0.85 - 33 1388 1386 cubebene - - 0.28 - 0.44 2.06 34 1391 1390 -elemene 1.34 - - - - - 35 1401 1401 longipinene - - - - - 0.13 36 1410 1408 -gurjunene - - - - - 0.96 37 1421 1418 trans--copaene 0.93 0.58 0.24 - 0.44 0.26 38 1434 1427 -gurjunene - - 0.22 - - 0.23 39 1440 1432 -guaiene - - - - - 0.28 40 1441 1443 aromandrene 2.17 0.63 0.19 - 0.55 23.42 41 1460 1462 alloaromandrene 0.68 - 0.23 - 0.43 6.89 42 1463 1457 dehydroaromadendrane - - - - - 0.31 43 1480 1477 γ-muurolene 1.53 0.90 0.28 0.46 1.70 - 44 1485 1483 germacrene D 18.10 - 0.09 1.20 5.44 0.15 45 1485 1489 amorphene 0.99 - 0.62 0.20 0.82 -

46 1493 1495 trans-muurola-4(14), 5-diene - - - 0.18 0.42 -

47 1498 1504 -selinene - 0.46 - - - 0.17 48 1490 1491 -selinene - 0.82 - - - 0.26 49 1500 1501 -muurolene 0.49 0.55 0.56 0.21 0.79 - 50 1503 1505 -trans-guaiene - 0.64 - - - - 51 1514 1516 -cadinene - 1.83 0.68 0.29 1.21 - 52 1523 1520 -cadinene 0.50 1.01 2.23 0.70 0.29 - 53 1529 1519 trans-calamenene - 0.64 - - - - 54 1539 1539 -cadinene - 1.08 - - 0.43 - 55 1546 1547 -calcorene - 0.77 - - - - Oxygenated sesquiterpenes 8.50 19.91 0.41 0.16 - -

56 1629 1626 1-epi-cubenol - - 0.23 - - - 57 1594 1572 1,5-epoxysalvial-4(14)-ene - 0.41 - - - - 58 1578 1578 spathulenol - 6.00 - - - - 59 1586 1586 globulol - 0.67 - - - - 60 1608 1606 -atlantol 0.07 0.63 - - - - 61 1619 1620 isologifolan-7-ol 0.20 - - - - - 62 1641 1626 epoxy-alloaromadendrene 3.19 1.80 0.18 0.16 - - 63 1646 1642 torreyol - 0.53 - - - - 64 1648 1650 agarospirol - 0.92 - - - - 65 1647 1651 cubenol 4.29 1.01 - - - - 66 1654 1659 -cadinol 0.75 - - - - - 67 1654 1660 -eudesmol - 3.88 - - - - 68 1680 1676 khausinol - 1.56 - - - - 69 1686 1684 -bisabolol - 0.49 - - - -

114

Hydro-distillation SPME

No RI a RI b Compound SC1 SC2 SC3 SC4 SC5 SC6

70 1687 1696 eudesma-4(15),7-dien-1-ol - 0.90 - - - -

71 1713 1712 14-hydroxy--humulene - 0.69 - - - -

72 1730 1726 isolongifolol - 0.42 - - - - Diterpene hydrocarbons 0.75 - - - - -

73 1896 1986 rimuene 0.75 - - - - - Oxygenated diterpenes 1.66 7.29 - - - -

74 1943 1945 phytol 0.48 - - - - - 75 1998 1999 manoyl oxide 1.18 7.29 - - - - Phenylpropanoids 1.54 - - - - 0.42

76 1025 1025 p-cymene - - - - - 0.42 78 1359 1356 eugenol 0.87 - - - - - 79 1519 1525 myristicin 0.67 - - - - - Other Compounds 24.60 0.42 0.88 1.24 21.40 0.86

80 812 812 2Z-octene - - 0.25 0.37 20.66 - 81 1101 1101 n-nonanal 0.45 - 0.43 0.87 0.74 0.20

82 1193 1196 Z-3-hexenyl butanoate - 0.42 - - - -

83 1201 1208 n-decanal 0.79 - 0.20 - - 0.16 84 1700 1699 n-heptadecane 1.09 - - - - - 85 1409 1411 dodecanal 0.82 - - - - - 86 1451 1459 2-pentadecanone 1.76 - - - - - 87 1471 1470 n-dodecanal 9.78 - - - - - 88 1472 1473 2E-dodecen-1-ol 5.35 - - - - - 89 1673 1675 n-tetradecanol 2.71 - - - - - 90 1830 1825 isopropyl myristate - - - - - 0.12 91 1876 1882 n-hexadecanol 0.76 - - - - - 92 1900 1899 n-nonadecane 0.43 - - - - -

93 1906 1906 isopimara-9(11),15-diene - - - - - 0.38

94 1922 1926 methyl hexadecanoate 0.66 - - - - -

Total identified (%) 94.53 97.19 99.80 98.59 99.62 98.24 SC1: hydro-distilled oil from fresh flowering parts; SC2:hydro-distilled air dried flowering parts; SC3: fresh pre-flower SPME, SC4: fresh full flowering SPME; SC5: post-flowering SPME; SC6: fresh roots SPME.

The GC/MS analysis of the hydro-distilled oil obtained from the air dried aerial

parts of S. ceratophylla resulted in the identification of 35 volatile constituents which

accounted for 97.19% of the total oil content. In comparison to the results obtained

from the oil of the fresh samples, qualitative and quantitative variations were noticed.

The essential oil of the dry plant was dominated by oxygenated terpenoids. Linalool

(55.55%) was the main oxygenated monoterpene component detected in the oil

followed by the oxygenated diterpenoid manoyl oxide which accounted for 7.29% of

the total oil content. Oxygenated sesquiterpenoids amounted to 19.91% of the total oil

content; spathulenol (6.00%) and -eudesmol (3.88%) were detected as the main

components of this fraction. The content of monoterpene hydrocarbons,

phenylpropanoids and aliphatic hydrocarbons decreased greatly as compared to their

content in the oil obtained from the fresh plant. Figure 1 shows the variations in the

115

chemical composition of the essential oil obtained from fresh and air dried aerial parts

of S. ceratophylla growing wild in Jordan.

Figure 1: Variations in the main classes of compounds detected in the hydro-distilled essential oil of fresh and air dried flowering parts of S. ceratophylla growing wild in Jordan.

The volatile organic compounds (VOC’s) emitted from the fresh roots and the

fresh flowers at the pre-flowering, full flowering and post flowering stages – extracted

by SPME, resulted in the identification of 28, 32, 25, and 26 components, acounting for

98.24%, 99.80%, 98.59% and 99.62% of total extract, respectively (Figure 2). The

VOC’s emitted by these fresh organs were characterized by having monoterpene

hydrocarbons as the main constituents, amounting to 60.14%, 89.49%, 92.28%, and

59.66% of the total composition. -pinene amounted to 22.93% of the total volatile

principles emitted by S. ceratophylla fresh roots, while -thujene was the main

component detected in the volatile vapor of the flowering organ at the pre-flowering

(40.61 %), fully expanded flower (40.92 %) and post flowering (35.29 %) stages. These

results, as compared to those obtained from hydrodistillation, clearly indicate the effect

of drying and heat exposure on the oxidation process (Table 1).

The chemical constituents of the hydro-distilled essential oil obtained from S.

ceratophylla has been investigated in Turkey. Gürsoy et al. (2012) evaluated the

chemical composition of the hydro-distilled oil of dried S. ceratophylla collected in 2009

from the B5 Kayseri-Incesu highway area and the oil was distilled using a clavenger

type apparatus.[15] The oil contained -muurolene (11.4%) and -pinene (7.6%) as the

main constituents, both, however, were detected at much lower concentrations as

compared to the current findings. Recently, geographical variations

116

Figure 2: Variations in chemical composition of SPME extracted volatile principles of fresh flowers (different stages) and roots of S. ceratophylla growing wild in Jordan.

in the essential oil composition of S. ceratophylla collected from three different

locations in Turkey have been evaluated where micro-distillation was applied to extract

the essential oil of the plant.[9] The results of that investigation revealed that the three

oil samples corresponding to the three different locations were rich in -pinene (23.7 -

27.0%). As compared to the results of our study, linalool, the main constituent detected

in S. ceratophylla from Jordanian origin, was found in much lower concentrations (2.8 -

4.0%).[9] Many air dried Salvia species were reported to contain large amounts of

linalool including S. verbenaca (30.72 %),[11] S. palaestina (8.6%),[16] and S. aethiopis

(9.2%).[17] On the other hand, S. palaestina from Jordanian origin was poor in linalool

but was found to be rich in germacrene D (26.02%).[18] Other Salvia species from

Jordanian origin including S. lanigera, S. spinosa, and S. syriaca contained linalool in

small concentrations (1.5%, 0.4% and 0.38%, respectively).[19] To conclude, variations

in chemotypes and genotypes,[20] in addition to geographical, environmental, and

experimental factors can affect the chemical composition of the essential oils and

volatile principles. Moreover, time of harvest, drying and extraction methods, part of

plant being investigated are also other important factors known to affect greatly the

composition of the hydro-distilled and volatile principles of the plant.

Antioxidant activity of the hydro-alcoholic extract of S. ceratophylla

Many mechanisms are known to account for antioxidant activity. These include

the decomposition of peroxides, prevention of chain initiation, prevention of continued

hydrogen abstraction, free radical scavenging, reducing capacity and binding of

transition metal ion catalyst.[14] In the current investigation, the antioxidant activity of

117

the hydro-alcoholic extract of the air dried aerial parts of S. ceratophylla using 2,2-

diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH•) and 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-

sulphonic acid (ABTS•+) assays was determined. Ascorbic acid and -tocopherol were

used as positive controls. The results of the DPPH radical inhibition for the hydro-

alcoholic extract of S. ceratophylla are shown in Table 2.

The reduction ability of DPPH radical formation is determined by the decrease in

its absorbance at 517 nm induced by antioxidants.[15] This could be attributed to the

hydrogen donating ability of the antioxidants. Generally, the hydro-alcoholic extract

showed a concentration-dependent activity profile (Table 2). The strongest DPPH

radical scavenging activity was found to be at 0.6 mg/mL (89.33 % ± 0.47 mg/mL) with

an IC50 value of 0.11 ± 1.85 mg/mL. The DPPH radical scavenging activity of the

hydroalcoholic extract of the plant was lower than those observed for tocopherol and

ascorbic acid.

Table 2: Antioxidant activity and IC50 values of the hydro-alcoholic extract obtained from air-dried S. ceratophylla compared to positive controls (ascorbic acid and α-tocopherol) on DPPH• assay.

Concentration (mg/mL)

% Inhibition Hydro-alcoholic-extract α- tocopherol Ascorbic acid

0.005 2.16 2.01 7.09 4.86 55.36 0.52 0.01 6.81 2.82 16.81 2.05 68.88 0.68 0.02 7.40 1.46 31.85 6.99 94.09 0.13 0.05 21.74 2.96 92.82 1.08 94.50 0.75 0.06 24.03 2.69 93.58 0.67 95.14 0.40 0.08 33.20 3.38 93.63 0.64 95.28 0.33 0.1 44.79 0.69 93.68 0.64 95.55 0.20 0.2 84.09 2.57 93.73 0.72 95.74 0.16 0.5 89.00 1.17 94.25 1.47 95.97 0.20 0.6 89.33 0.47 94.11 0.26 96.01 0.51 IC50 0.11 ± 1.85 0.03 ± 1.74 0.004 ± 0.36

The ABTS•+ radical scavenging activity of the hydro-alcoholic extract of S.

ceratophylla increased steadily with increasing the concentration of the extract. The

data indicate that the hydro-alcoholic extract had interesting antioxidant activity that is

slightly lower than those observed for the positive controls employed in this

investigation (Table 3). Interstingly, at 0.6 mg/mL, the hydro-alcoholic extract revealed

higher inhibition activity for the ABTS•+ assay as compared to that observed for the

DPPH• method (98.760.38; 89.33 0.47, respectively). This is also confirmed by the

lower IC50 value (0.09 mg/mL ± 2.91) compared to that observed for the DPPH• assay

(0.11 mg/mL ± 1.85). This result indicates that the plant can be used as a source of

natural antioxidants.

118

Table 3: Antioxidant activity and IC50 of the hydro-alcoholic extract obtained from air-dried S. ceratophylla and positive controls (ascorbic acid and α-tocopherol) on ABTS•+ assay.

Concentration (mg/mL)

% Inhibition Hydroalcoholic-extract α- tocopherol Ascorbic acid

0.005 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.6

IC50 0.09 ± 2.91 0.06 ± 1.73 0.018 ± 0.37

Conclusion Various methods are used to evaluate the antioxidant capacity of plant extracts.

Tawah et al.[21] evaluated the antioxidant activity (expressed as trolox equivalent

antioxidant capacity) of S. ceratophylla from Jordan using a modified ABTS•+ method.

Despite the differences in the methodology employed compared to the current

investigation, the results clearly indicate moderate to good antioxidant activity of the

methanolic extract obtained from the plant. Moreover, the current investigation

revealed slight but noticale differences among the two methods employed for the

evaluation of the antioxidant activity. Such differences could be attributed to the

different ways by which the antioxidants in the sample can react with the radicals

used.[22]

References [1] Kharazian, N., Acta Bot. Bras., 2014, 28, 281-292.

[2] Kushiro, T.; Shibuya, M.; Masuda, K.; Ebizuka, Y., J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122: 6816–6824.

[3] Gören, AC.; Kilic, T.; Dirmenci, T.; Bilsel, G., Biochem Syst Ecol, 2006, 34, 160-164.

[4] Cavallo, F.; Nencin,i C.; Capasso, A., Pharmacologyonline, 2006, 1, 1–10.

[5] Al-Eisawi, D.M.H., Flora of Jordan Checklist, revised Edition 1, The University of Jordan Press, Amman, Jordan, 2013.

[6] Kintzios, S.E. Sage: The Genus Salvia. CRC Press, 2000, 10-11.

[7] Al-Eisawi, D.M., Field Guide to Wild Flowers of Jordan and Neighbouring Countries, Jordan University, Amman, Jordan, 1998.

[8] Gören, A.; Topcu, G.; Öksüz, S.; Kökdil, G.; Voelter, W.; Ulubelen, A., NPR, 2002., 16, 47- 52.

[9] Başer, K.H.C.; Aģalar, H.G.; Celep, F.; Kahraman, A.; Doģan, M.; Demirci, B., Turkish Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2015, 12, 53-58.

119

[10] Abu-Zarga, M.H.; Al-Jaber, H.I.; Baba Amer, Z.Y.; Sahkrib, L.; Al-Qudah, M.; Al-Humaidi J.Y.; Abaza, I.F., Afifi; F.U., TBAP, 2012., 3, 224-231.

[11] Al-Jaber, H.I., TEOP, 2015, 18, 718-724.

[12] Adams, R.P., Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Quadrupole Mass Spectroscopy, Carol Strea, IL: Allured Publishing, 2001.

[13] Al-Qudah, M.A.; Al-Ghoul, A.M.; Trawenh, I.N.; Al-Jaber, H.I.; Al Shboul, T.M.; Abu Zarga, M.H.; Abu Orabi, S.T., TBAP, 2014, 4, 52 – 61.

[14] Re, R.; Pellegrini, N.; Proteggente, A.; Pannala, A.; Yang, M.; Rice-Evans, C. Free Radical Biol. Med., 1999, 26, 1231-7.

[15] Gürsoy, N.; Tepe, B.; Akpulat, H.A., Records Natural Products, 2012, 6, 278-287.

[16] Senatore, F.; Formisano, C.; Arnold, N.A.; Piozzi, F., JEOR, 2005, 17, 419–421.

[17] Baģci, E.; Koçak, A.A., Science and Engineering Journal of Firat University, 2007, 19, 435-442.

[18] Al-Jaber, H.I.; Al-Qudah, M.A.; Barhoumi, L.M.; Abaza, I.F; Afifi, F.U., Natural Product Research., 2012, 26, 1179-1187.

[19] Flamini, G.; Cioni, P.L.; Morelli, I.; Bader, A., Food Chem., 2007, 100, 732–735.

[20] Afifi, F.U.; Kasabri H.I.; Abu-Irmaileh, B.E.; Al-Qudah, M.A.; Abaza, I.F., NPC, 2016., 11, 535–538.

[21] Tawah, K.; Alali, F.Q.; Gharaibeh, M.; Mohammad, M.; El-Elimat, T., Food Chem., 2007, 104, 1372–1378.

[22] Shah, P.; Modi, H.A., IJRASET, 2015, 3, 2321–9653.


Recommended