Date post: | 15-Jun-2015 |
Category: |
Science |
Upload: | oresti-banos |
View: | 169 times |
Download: | 4 times |
Recognition of Human Physical
Activity based on a novel
Hierarchical Weighted Classification
scheme
IJCNN 2011 San José, California (USA) O. Banos, M. Damas, H. Pomares, I. Rojas Department of Computer Architecture and Computer Technology (University of Granada)
Work supported in part by the Spanish CICYT Project TIN2007-60587, Junta de Andalucia Projects P07-TIC-02768 and P07-TIC-02906, the
CENIT project AmIVital and the FPU Spanish grant AP2009-2244
Agenda
Introduction
Experimental setup
Methods
Results
Conclusions
05/05/2014
2
Activity Recognition
• Fundamental part of medical/health assistant work, being applicable to other areas (sport efficiency, videogames industry, robotics, etc.)
• Changeableness due to the capability to discover and identify actions, movements and gestures than normally are unnoticed
• Objectives
05/05/2014
3
Define an original methodology Identify the main characteristics Improve state of the art results through efficient and accurate knowledge inference algorithms
Experimental setup
Fiv
e a
cc
ele
ro
me
ter
s
Walking Sitting and relaxing Standing still Running Bicycling Lying down Brushing teeth Climbing stairs
05/05/2014
4
Eig
ht
ac
tiv
itie
s
Data preprocessing
• Different approaches were studied
• Best results “a posteriori” using a LPF+HPF (IIR elliptic)
05/05/2014
5
ORIGINAL MEAN FILTERING LPF+HPF
Feature extraction
Magnitudes
Amplitude Autocorrelation function Cepstrum Correlation lags Cross correlation function Energy spectral density Spectral coherence Spectrum amplitude/phase Histogram Historical data lags Minimum phase reconstruction Wavelet decomposition
Statistical functions
4th and 5th central statistical moments Energy Arithmetic/Harmonic/Geometric/ Trimmed mean Entropy Fisher asymmetry coefficient Maximum / Position of Median Minimum / Position of Mode Kurtosis Data range Total harmonic deviation Variance Zero crossing counts
05/05/2014
6
Why feature selection is needed?
• Influence on classification process
OPTIMUM
Few Features Good classification
0 500 1000-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1x 10
4 Thigh accelerometer
Features
Fe
atu
re v
alu
e
05/05/2014
7
• Huge feature set (861 parameters 2861 1.5 x 10259 possible combinations)
Mann-Whitney-
Wilcoxon FS
Binary vs. multiclass classification
05/05/2014
8
• # of classes discriminated
• Binary classifiers are more accurate in general than direct multiclass classifiers
• Problem: define an adequate multiclass extension scheme
• Depends on the particular experiment • No general models for multisource problems
2 SVM, NB
≥2 DT
Hierarchical weighted classifier (HWC)
05/05/2014
9
N classes
NqxDxO mknq
N
n
mnmkmq ,...,11
)(maxarg mkmqq
m xOq
N
k
mk
mnmn
R
R
1
M
k
k
mm
R
R
1
NqxOxxOxO pkpq
M
p
pMkkqkq ,...,1)(}),...,({)(1
1
],...,1[)(maxarg NqxOq kqq
M sources &
Results
05/05/2014
10
• Naïve Bayes
• 10-fold cross validation
• N=8, M=5
70,00
80,00
90,00
100,00
Hip Wrist Arm Ankle Thigh Fusion
Cla
ssif
icat
ion
acc
ura
cy (
%)
Using 1 feature for each class classifier
MV
HWC
70,00
80,00
90,00
100,00
Hip Wrist Arm Ankle Thigh Fusion
Cla
ssif
icat
ion
acc
ura
cy (
%)
Using 10 features for each class classifier
MV
HWC
Comparison with other studies
05/05/2014
11
Work Accuracy rates
S.W. Lee and K. Mase. Activity and location recognition using wearable sensors. 92.85% to 95.91%
J. Mantyjarvi, J. Himberg, and T. Seppanen. Recognizing human motion with multiple acceleration sensors.
83.00% to 90.00%
K. Aminian, P. Robert, E. E. Buchser, B. Rutschmann, D. Hayoz, and M. Depairon. Physical activity monitoring based on accelerometry: validation and comparison with video observation.
89.30%
L. Bao and S.S. Intille. Physical Activity Recognition from Acceleration Data under Semi-Naturalistic Conditions
89.00%
THIS WORK 97.08% (1 feat.), 97.81% (10 feat.)
Source: L. Bao and S.S. Intille. Physical Activity Recognition from Acceleration Data under Semi-Naturalistic Conditions
Conclusions
• The hierarchical system defined only requires: ▫ Binary classifiers based on individual features with
high binary discriminant capability ▫ A few weighting parameters and simple decision rules
• According to the particular activity recognition model: ▫ HWC offers better results for both source and fusion
classification approaches Improvement up to 15% with respect to MV Similar good results when fusion for both 1 and 10
features are used Particular good results for the wrist or arm data based
source classifier (≈96%)
05/05/2014
12
Future work
• Test non-linear subclassifiers combinations • Include a probability of membership to the
different classes besides the current weighted scheme
• Analyze other multiclass extensions and compare with HWC performance
• Spread the study to a larger number of activities (classes)
• Apply this methodology to other kind of problems
05/05/2014
13
Thank you for your attention
Questions?
05/05/2014
14
Oresti Baños Legrán Dep. Computer Architecture & Computer Technology
Faculty of Computer & Electrical Engineering (ETSIIT) University of Granada, Granada (SPAIN) Email: [email protected], [email protected]
Phone: +34 958 241 516 Fax: +34 958 248 993