Recommended 10-Year Facility Master Plan 3.28.11

Austin independent school districtDistrict-WiDe Facility Master Plan

March 2011

EXHIBIT "B"

As a planning team we appreciate the opportunity to serve the Austin Independent School District.

DeJONG-RICHTER LLC Magellan Consulting Cuningham Group BLGY Architecture

EXHIBIT "B"

District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011 Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Facility Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................................. 10

Timeline for Facility Master Plan Implementation ......................................................................................................................... 13 Estimated Budget ...................................................................................................................................................................... 15

Area Facility Options ....................................................................................................................................................................... 16 Additional Recommendations ........................................................................................................................................................ 32

Policy Recommendations ........................................................................................................................................................ 32 Management Recommendations ........................................................................................................................................... 33 Staffing Recommendations ...................................................................................................................................................... 33 Energy Efficiency Recommendations ...................................................................................................................................... 34 Maintenance Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................ 34 Design Recommendations........................................................................................................................................................ 35 Safety and Security Recommendations .................................................................................................................................. 35 Use Recommendations ................................................................................................................................................................... 36 Technology Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................... 36 Other Recommendations ......................................................................................................................................................... 37

Facility Summary Reports with Facility Master Plan Recommendations ..................................................................................... 38 Elementary Schools (Alpha) ............................................................................................................................................................ 39 Middle Schools (Alpha) ................................................................................................................................................................. 119 High Schools (Alpha) ...................................................................................................................................................................... 138 Special Schools (Alpha) ................................................................................................................................................................. 151 Support Facilities (Alpha) ............................................................................................................................................................... 154 Educational Framework ....................................................................................................................................................................... 165

Planning Guidelines ...................................................................................................................................................................... 165 Programmatic Considerations .................................................................................................................................................... 166

Enrollment Projections ................................................................................................................................................................... 169 Historical Enrollment ...................................................................................................................................................................... 169 Birth Data ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 175 Projected Enrollment .................................................................................................................................................................... 176

Page 1

EXHIBIT "B"

District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011 Capacity Analysis .......................................................................................................................................................................... 178 Utilization ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 180 Facility Condition Analysis ............................................................................................................................................................ 184

Educational Adequacy Assessment ............................................................................................................................................ 186 Building Deficiencies ...................................................................................................................................................................... 187

Facility Options .............................................................................................................................................................................. 189

Criteria .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 189 Appendices Appendix A ........................................................................................................................ FCI White Paper and Facility FCI Charts Appendix B ...................................................................................................................................................Facility Capacity Charts Appendix C ......................................................................................................................................... Visioning Workshop Summary Appendix D .................................................................................................................................... Community Dialogue #1 Results Appendix E ..................................................................................................................................... Community Dialogue #2 Results Appendix F ............................................................................................................................... Community Meeting #3 Comments Appendix G ............................................................................................................. Summary of Facility Options Discussed by FMPTF Appendix H .................................................................................................................................................................... Glossary of Terms

Page 2

EXHIBIT "B"

District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011

Acknowledgements We would like to extend our appreciation to the Austin Independent School District Board of Trustees for its commitment to the Facility Master Planning Process. We realize that the recommendations contained within the plan will create challenges for the community in the months and years to come. With the support of the school district and community members, the Austin Independent School District can continue its mission to provide a comprehensive educational experience that is high quality, challenging, and inspires all students to make a positive contribution to society.

Board of Trustees Mark Williams, District 5, President

Vincent M. Torres, District 4, Vice President Lori Moya, District 6, Secretary

Cheryl Bradley, District 1 Sam Guzman, District 2

Christine Brister, District 3 Robert Schneider, District 7

Annette LoVoi, At-Large Position 8 Tamala Barksdale, At-Large Position 9

Austin Independent School District

Dr. Meria Carstarphen, Superintendent of Schools Lawrence Fryer, Chief Operations Officer Paul Turner, Executive Director of Facilities

Curt Shaw, Director of Construction Management Pat Rossett, Assistant Director of Bond Planning

Joe Silva, Assistant Director of Planning Beth Wilson, Project Facilitator

Page 3

EXHIBIT "B"

District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011 Facility Master Plan Task Force We take this opportunity to acknowledge the Facility Mater Plan Task Force for its efforts in guiding the planning process. We thank the members for their dedication and commitment to this process that resulted in the development of the facility plan for Austin Independent School District. Co-Chairs: Richard Frazier

Janet Mitchell John Alawneh Larry Amaro Adolphus Anderson Evelyn Andrews Tony Arnold Frederick Bentley Sally Brackett Chris Carrillo-Spano Jacqueline Chatham Tommy Cox Joey Crumley Bill De Dufour Julie Delgado Janet Dewey Elizabeth Dickey Dan Diehl Freddie B. Dixon, Sr. Martha Dolman Jim Evans

Kelly Evans Frances Vicki Everett Rene Garganta Greg Goodman Annette Gregory Zoe Griffith Silas Griggs Janis Guerrero Kris Hafezizadeh Bergeron Harris Anne M. Heinen Heath Hignight Lawrence P. Huang Linda Johnson Bob King J. Laverne Morris-Parker Lucia Markert Carolyn Merritt Adelina Miller Paul Mitchell

Susan Moffat Chris Moore Audrea Moyers Beth Orta Mark Penniman Elizabeth Polk Jacqueline Porter Pete Price Douglas Rhodenbaugh John Rocha Michelle Rusnak Dave Sanders Curt Shaw David W. Sullivan Kathie Tovo Laura Tuma Paul Turner Texanna Turner Chad Williams

Page 4

EXHIBIT "B"


Introduction Facility Master Plan Vision Statement

All AISD schools will inspire high student achievement and support common community goals through

equitable, inviting facilities that integrate technology and are optimally used, accessible, sustainable, and meet highest educational adequacy standards.

The Austin Independent School District is committed to providing high quality and challenging educational experiences for all students who are enrolled in its schools. To ensure this commitment, the District developed the AISD 2010-2015 Strategic Plan. As part of Strategy #4 of that plan, key steps 4.5 and 4.7 included development of a long-range facility master plan as follows. Strategy #4 – align resources to accomplish priorities within a balanced budget

4.5 Develop and implement long-range plans for facilities, transportation, libraries and technology that align infrastructure with the district’s educational plan 4.7 Ensure efficiency and efficacy of existing facilities before investing in new facilities

This planning process, which is data driven, takes into consideration enrollments, school building capacities, educational framework, educational vision, and facility conditions for 114 school campuses and 12 support facilities in the District.

The facility master planning process is a proactive approach to explore long- and short-term academic and facility options and solutions. Among the most important components contributing to the success of the plan is the involvement and input gathered from Austin community members. The recommendations contained within will serve as the basis from which Austin Independent School District facilities will be transformed into a new generation of schools that accommodates educational needs today and in the future. The final Austin Independent School District Facility Master Plan will serve as a road map that will address facility conditions, an implementation timeframe, and project costs.

Page 5

EXHIBIT "B"

District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011 Executive Summary District Statistics AISD maintains approximately 87,000 permanent classroom seats and an additional 16,000 seats in portable/temporary buildings in 11.5 million square feet of educational facilities. The enrollment for the 2010-11 school year was approximately 86,000 students. Based on the latest demographic study, enrollment is projected to continue to increase to 98,000 by 2020.

Total Enrollment 2010-2011: 85,929

Grades Pre-K-5: 48,167 Grades 6-8: 16,577 Grades 9-12: 20,662 Separate and Special Campuses: 523

114 School Campuses 80 Elementary Schools 19 Middle Schools 12 High Schools 3 Special Schools

12 Support Facilities

Utilization By the numbers, there is an excess of 1,000 seats in addition to the capacity in portable buildings. The reality is that there are some areas experiencing population growth and others experiencing decline within the District. Combined with student migration patterns, there are significantly over- and under-utilized facilities as a result.

Facility Condition Approximately $1.1 billion in deficiencies was identified in the facility condition assessment, including a functional equity and ADA/TAS analysis, completed in 2010, and the most recent educational adequacy assessment completed the summer of 2010. These deficiencies have been categorized into the following priorities. Priority 1: Currently Critical (Immediate) Priority 2: Potentially Critical (To be corrected within one

year) Priority 3: Necessary / Not Yet Critical (1-2 Years) Priority 4: Recommended (3-5 Years) Priority 5: Does Not Meet Current Code/Standards

/Grandfathered Addressing Growth The north central and southern areas of AISD continue to experience the most enrollment growth. The following new construction programs, funded by current and previous bond programs, will help address overcrowding issues. Baldwin ES – Opened 2010 Early Childhood Center – Opens 2012 and will

relieve Linder ES New North Central ES – Currently in site selection

process New ES – Undesignated

In addition, land acquisition and funding have been approved for a new middle school site in the

Page 6

EXHIBIT "B"

District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011 southeastern part of the District, and a new high school site in the southern region of the District. The construction of the middle and high schools is anticipated to be a part of a future bond program. As enrollment is projected to increase, it is estimated that three new elementary schools and additions at seven elementary schools and one middle school would be required. Currently, the District targets a 125% utilization rate as a precipitant for potential new construction or additions. Process In April of 2010, a Facility Master Plan Task Force was created and an educational planning firm was hired by AISD in order to develop the District-wide Facility Master Plan. The Task Force, comprised of parents, community members, teachers, principals, and AISD staff was charged with the following tasks. Monitor the process to ensure equity and fairness

across the District Review and confirm recommendations and

resolve conflicting recommendations Prepare information and host community

dialogues and meetings Review and analyze data Review and analyze community input Develop and recommend an Educational

Framework to the Board of Trustees Develop facility options to improve efficiency and

address student needs Develop and recommend the district-wide Facility

Master Plan to the Board of Trustees

The Facility Master Plan Task Force held 25 meetings over the course of 10 months and hosted 11 community meetings. In addition, the Task Force Co-chairs attended ten meetings at various school campuses throughout the District. The community meetings provided invaluable input to the Task Force throughout the process. Results and comments from these meetings are available in the appendix of this report. Challenges During the process, the Task Force was faced with several challenges and complex issues associated with AISD facilities and planning for the future. The following outline is meant to provide an understanding and reflection of the real issues with which the Task Force has been struggling, and the resulting implications for facility master planning. Challenge #1: Accomplishing priorities within a shrinking budget In order for AISD to continue operating as it is today, an assessed budget shortfall between $94 and $100 million for fiscal year 2012 will have to be addressed. Can increasing facility efficiency decrease the budget shortfall, and how can this be balanced with the future of neighborhood schools, their design, size, and sustainability? Challenge #2: Student migration The number of students previously living within the Austin urban core, has declined over the past 20 years, resulting in 25% of schools housing less than 85% of their permanent student capacities. Conversely, there have

Page 7

EXHIBIT "B"

District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011 been large population increases in the outer areas of the District, resulting in 50% of schools housing more than 105% of their permanent student capacities. However, not all under- and over-utilization is a direct result of population and demographic shifts. Large numbers of students that travel outside of the boundary of their assigned school present a challenge when making future facility decisions. Should long-term planning address the number of students living within the attendance area, or should it address the number of students currently attending that school, including transfer students? What are the principles of the current transfer policies and how will they be applied in the future? Challenge #3: The role of facility planning in supporting and complementing educational program planning AISD strives to maintain academic standards, programs, and performance consistently throughout the District. From a facilities perspective, what recommendations can be made to help move the District toward increasing graduation rates and eliminating the achievement gap? Since programs are capable of changing faster than bricks and mortar, how can facilities remain flexible and be retrofitted for multi-use where practical? How can facility decisions positively impact student achievement? For example, is it more beneficial to offer duplicate programs, such as fine arts or career technology education, or is it better to provide transportation to a single program? What are the cost implications?

Challenge #4: Boundary adjustment solutions A logical solution to improve efficiencies among overcrowded and under-utilized schools is to adjust the attendance boundaries and assign more or fewer students as appropriate. In practice, it is not that simple. In some cases, under-utilization occurs when a large number of students migrate to schools outside of their geographical attendance zone. Increasing the size of the boundary of the under-utilized school will not fix the problem. In addition, if the aforementioned migrating students decided to attend their home schools, the result could be an overcrowded scenario. In other cases, there are too many overcrowded or under-enrolled schools adjacent to each other. This results in a “domino effect” of moving students from one location to the other in order to increase or decrease enrollment. In many instances, students would not be able to attend the school closest to their homes or in their neighborhoods. In fact, they may have to drive past a school closer to their home in order to attend another school to achieve balanced enrollment. Challenge #5: Balancing short- and long-term needs Significant resources will be needed to address the capital projects outlined in this facility plan. In addition to the funds needed to renovate AISD’s facility inventory, additional investment in deferred maintenance and small capital projects will continue as buildings age. At the same time, new schools will need to be constructed to accommodate growth.

Page 8

EXHIBIT "B"


Test_

Page 9

EXHIBIT "B"


Facility Recommendations

I. Portable Reduction The annual cost to operate a portable building in AISD is approximately $4.00 per square foot. The District currently has 668 portable buildings which equates to approximately 1,336 classrooms. The criteria used to identify portable reduction include:

A utilization rate (enrollment/permanent capacity) at the school location that falls below 85%.

Age and condition of the portables would be used to determine which portables to take out of service unless their current location would cause additional moving costs.

There is a potential to reduce the total number of portables in the District by 108, using the above criteria of 85% utilization. Based on a minimum annual operating cost of $4.00 per square foot, this would result in an annual savings of $663,552.

II. Funded New Construction The following new construction projects, funded by current and previous bond programs, will help address some overcrowding issues.

a. Baldwin ES – Opened 2010 b. Early Childhood Center – Opens 2012 and will

relieve Linder ES

c. New North Central ES – Currently in site selection process

d. New ES – The Facility Master Plan Task Force recommends locating the 2008 Bond Program undesignated ES to the North Central area.

e. District-wide Performing Arts Center

III. Unfunded New Construction and Capital Improvement

a. Priority 1 & 2 Needs

Priority 1 & 2 needs identified by the facility condition assessment during 2007-2010, include currently critical and potentially critical needs at each school campus and support facility. The total cost to address these needs is approximately $319,528,000 phased over eight years.

b. Functional Equity

A functional equity study was completed by the District during 2008-2010. This study identified core areas and some specialized classrooms, within specific school campuses that did not meet the current educational specification standards. The cost to resolve these issues is approximately $131,000,000, phased over eight years.

c. New Schools and Additions Land acquisition and funding has been approved for a new middle school site in the southeastern part of the District, and a new high school site in south Austin. The construction of the middle and high schools is anticipated to be a part of a future bond program.

Page 10

EXHIBIT "B"


As enrollment is projected to increase, it is estimated that two additional elementary schools would be required. Currently, the District targets a 125% utilization rate as a precipitant for potential new construction or additions. The unfunded new construction recommendations include the following:

1. Three new elementary schools 2. Seven elementary school classroom additions 3. One new middle school 4. One middle school classroom addition 5. One new high school

IV. Closures/Consolidations

Although the Task Force’s recommendations include the consideration of school closures because of the severity of the District’s budget short fall, significant concerns were expressed by some members of the Task Force regarding the impact of school closures on communities, especially in those where recent gains in student performance could be jeopardized.

a. Consider consolidating/closing one middle school. b. Consider consolidating/closing eight elementary

schools.

V. Programs Recommendations

a. Relocate Alternative Learning Center (ALC) possibly in a different quadrant of the city .

b. Identify a Pre-K-8 school (begin Pre-K-5) to relieve north central overcrowding. Also, consider this model in other areas of the district.

c. Consider moving 6th grade from elementary to middle school to relieve overcrowding in

elementary schools and under-utilization in middle schools.

d. Explore Pre-K Centers to address overcrowding e. Conduct intensive planning for School for Young

Men (site TBD based on community input, feasibility, and availability of funding).

f. Conduct planning for district open-enrollment signature programs and vertical team signature programs, and their equitable geographic distribution.

g. Complete analysis of changes to district programs that generate facility needs.

h. Conduct planning for Career Tech Hubs (sites TBD based on community input, feasibility, and availability of funding).

i. Consider options for separating some elementary schools into Pre-K-3 and 4-8 grade configurations to address overcrowding.

VI. Policy

a. Seriously consider redrawing boundaries in most

critically overcrowded regions where possible. b. Initiate a District-wide boundary assessment and

possible realignment beginning January 2012 to balance enrollment and improve vertical alignment.

c. Address strict application of transfer policy as it applies to overcrowding and under-utilization.

VII. Operating Efficiency and Potential Revenue

a. Do not renew administrative leases that end in

FY’11.

Page 11

EXHIBIT "B"


b. Do not renew administrative leases that end in FY’14.

c. Prepare and sell Baker Administrative Center. d. Prepare and sell Carruth Administrative Center. e. Expand District energy efficiency programs,

including coordinated facilities summer shutdowns where feasible.

f. Identify additional energy efficiencies to include in 2012 bond package.

Page 12

EXHIBIT "B"


Timeline for Facility Master Plan Implementation

FY ‘12 FY ‘13 FY ‘14 FY ‘15 FY ‘16 FY ‘17 FY ‘18 FY ‘19 FY ‘20 FY ‘21 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

Seriously consider redrawing boundaries in most critically overcrowded regions where possible

Boundary review and redraw TBD



Open classroom additions at four elementary schools (requires future bond funding, $4.8M each)

Open classroom additions at two elementary schools (requires bond future funding, $4.8M each)

Open classroom addition at one middle school (requires future bond funding, $4.8M) Open classroom addition at one elementary school (requires future bond funding, $4.8M)

Consider consolidating/closing one middle school and four elementary schools

Consider consolidating/closing four elementary schools

Preliminary planning for upcoming bond proposals (every 4 yrs.)

Proposed Bond Program Election (>$500M*)

Proposed Bond Program Election (TBD*)

Proposed Bond Program Election (TBD*)

Open Linder Early Childhood Center (2008 Bond funding available, $21.6M)

Open Performing Arts Center (2008 Bond, funding available, $40M)_ __ Open North Central Elementary School (2004 Bond funding available, $28.1M)

Open new undesignated ES -recommended for North Central (2008 Bond, funding available, $28.1M)__ _ Open new undesignated ES (requires future bond funding, $24.5M)_________ Open new undesignated ES (requires future bond funding, $24.5M)

Open new undesignated ES (requires future bond funding, $24.5M)

Open new Southeast MS (requires future bond funding, $55.7M)

Open new South High School (requires future bond funding, $106.6M)

Relocate Alternative Learning Center (consider possibilities in different quadrant of the city)

Identify pre-k-8 school (begin pre-k-5) to relieve north central elementary school overcrowding. Also, consider this model in other areas of the district.

Consider options for separating some ES into Pk-3rd and 4th – 8th to address overcrowding__ _ Explore 3rd Pre-k center to address overcrowding TBD

Consider moving 6th grade from elementary to middle school to relieve overcrowding and underutilization




Analyze each school to determine if limitations to transfers/choice options are needed

Review application of transfer policy for efficacy and fidelity

Note: In 2015-16 projected student enrollment > 92,000 In 2020-21 projected student enrollment > 98,000 *The Bond Program will focus on Priority 1 and 2 building systems renovations, functional equity improvements, and new schools as indicated by demographic projections and the recommendations of a Bond Advisory Committee that are approved by the Board of Trustees. The specific dates and total bond election amounts must be approved by the Board of Trustees

Page 13

EXHIBIT "B"


FY ‘12 FY ‘13 FY ‘14 FY ‘15 FY ‘16 FY ‘17 FY ‘18 FY ‘19 FY ‘20 FY ‘21

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

Address Priority 1 and 2 renovations and functional equity improvements (requires future bond funding)








Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Do not renew administrative leases that finish in FY’11__ Explore terminating administrative leases that finish in FY’14

Do not renew administrative leases that finish in FY’14

Prepare and sell Baker Prepare and sell CAC

Expand existing district energy efficiency programs, including coordinated facilities summer shutdowns where feasible___________ Identify additional energy efficiency facility needs to include in 2012 bond package

Reduce energy usage to 95% of baseline

Reduce energy usage to 90% of baseline or lower








Programs

Intensive planning for School for Young Men (site TBD based on community input, feasibility, availability of funding)

Open School for Young Men (if feasible and funding available)

Planning for district open-enrollment signature programs, and vertical team signature programs and their equitable geographic distribution_____________ Complete analysis of changes to district programs that generate facilities needs

Planning for Career Tech Hubs (locations and funding sources TBD)

Open Career Tech Hubs (1 north, 1 south)

Note: In 2015-16 projected student enrollment > 92,000 In 2020-21 projected student enrollment > 98,000 *The Bond Program will focus on Priority 1 and 2 building systems renovations, functional equity improvements, and new schools as indicated by demographic projections and the recommendations of a Bond Advisory Committee that are approved by the Board of Trustees. The specific dates and total bond election amounts must be approved by the Board of Trustees.

Page 14

EXHIBIT "B"


Estimated Budget The following tables provide an estimated budget, including estimated costs or savings by year, for the facility recommendations. The estimated costs or savings are based on AISD budgeted operating costs and recently completed facility evaluations.

FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTAL

I. Operational Cost SavingsPortable Reductions (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (6,000,000)$

Total Cost / (Savings) (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (600,000)$ (6,000,000)$

II. Funded New ConstructionEarly Childhood Center -$ 21,600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 21,600,000$

New North Central ES -$ -$ 28,100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 28,100,000$

Performing Arts Center -$ -$ 40,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 40,000,000$

New ES (North Central) -$ -$ -$ 28,100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 28,100,000$

Total Cost / (Savings) -$ 21,600,000$ 68,100,000$ 28,100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 117,800,000$

III. Un-Funded New Construction and Capital ImprovementsPriority 1 & 2 Needs -$ -$ 39,941,000$ 39,941,000$ 39,941,000$ 39,941,000$ 39,941,000$ 39,941,000$ 39,941,000$ 39,941,000$ 319,528,000$

Functional Equity -$ -$ 16,350,000$ 16,350,000$ 16,350,000$ 16,350,000$ 16,350,000$ 16,350,000$ 16,350,000$ 16,350,000$ 130,800,000$

New Schools

New ES -$ -$ -$ 24,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 24,500,000$

New ES -$ -$ -$ 24,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 24,500,000$

New ES -$ -$ -$ -$ 24,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 24,500,000$

New MS -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 55,700,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 55,700,000$

New HS -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 106,600,000$ -$ -$ -$ 106,600,000$

Additions

4 ES Classroom Additions -$ 19,200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 19,200,000$

2 ES Classroom Additions -$ -$ 9,600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,600,000$

1 ES Classroom Addition -$ -$ -$ 4,800,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,800,000$

1 MS Classroom Addition -$ -$ -$ 4,800,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,800,000$

Total Cost / (Savings) -$ -$ 75,491,000$ 114,891,000$ 90,391,000$ 111,991,000$ 162,891,000$ 56,291,000$ 56,291,000$ 56,291,000$ 724,528,000$

Page 15

EXHIBIT "B"


Area Facility Options

The following pages describe, outline, and summarize facility options by area in the District. The District has been divided into the 10 following with a map provided on the following page.

Area 1: Northwest – Anderson HS, Murchison MS, Davis ES, Doss ES, Hill ES, Summitt ES

Area 2: North Central – Lanier HS, Burnet MS, Dobie MS, Barrington ES, Cook ES, Graham ES, Hart ES, McBee ES, Pillow ES, Walnut Creek ES, Wooldridge ES, Wooten ES, Read Pre-K Center

Area 3: Central West – McCallum HS, Lamar MS, Brentwood ES, Brown ES, Bryker Woods ES, Casis ES, Gullet ES, Highland Park ES, Lee ES, Mathews ES, Pease ES, Reilly ES, Ridgetop ES

Area 4: Northeast – LASA HS, LBJ HS, Reagan HS, Garcia MS, Pearce MS, Webb MS, Andrews ES, Blanton ES, Harris ES, Jordan ES, Maplewood ES, Overton ES, Pecan Springs ES, Pickle ES, Winn ES

Area 5: Central East – Eastside Memorial HS, Kealing MS, Martin MS, Allan ES, Allison ES, Blackshear ES, Brooke ES, Campbell ES, Govalle ES, Metz ES, Norman ES, Oak Springs ES, Ortega ES, Sanchez ES, Sims ES, Zavala ES, Garza Independence HS, Alternative Learning Center (ALC)

Area 6: Central – Austin HS, Travis HS, Fulmore MS, O.Henry MS, Barton Hills ES, Becker ES, Dawson ES, Linder ES, Travis Heights ES, Zilker ES

Area 7: Southwest – Bowie HS, Bailey MS, Gorzycki MS, Small MS, Baldwin ES, Baranoff ES, Clayton ES, Kiker ES, Mills ES, Oak Hill ES, Patton ES

Area 8: South – Crockett HS, Bedichek MS, Covington MS, Boone ES, Cunningham ES, Galindo ES, Joslin ES, St. Elmo ES, Sunset Valley ES, The Ann Richards School for Young Women Leaders

Area 9: Southeast – Mendez MS, Blazier ES, Houston ES, Langford ES, Palm ES, Perez ES, Rodriguez ES, Widen ES

Area 10: Far South – Akins HS, Paredes MS, Casey ES, Cowan ES, Kocurek ES, Menchaca ES, Odom ES, Pleasant Hill ES, Williams ES

Page 16

EXHIBIT "B"

District-wide Facility Master Plan

Final Report – 03/28/2011

Page 17

EXHIBIT "B"


AREA 1 – NORTHWEST Anderson High School Murchison Middle School Davis, Doss, Hill and Summitt elementary

schools Area Issues

Based on the number of students living in the area for the 2010-11 school year:

The area has a slight deficiency in the number of seats available at the elementary and middle school levels.

The number of students migrating into the area is higher than the number of students migrating out of the area at all levels.

Space Utilization

Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area: One elementary school, Doss, is severely

overcrowded (above 125% of permanent capacity)

Two elementary schools, Hill and Summitt, are overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of permanent capacity)

One elementary school, Davis, is in the target range of percent of permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%)

The middle school, Murchison, is overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of permanent capacity)

The high school, Anderson, is in the target range of percent of permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%)

Educational Enhancement Academic Ratings:

Future Growth Moderate population growth is projected in this

area in the next five years. Facility Condition On average, the facilities have an FCI (Facility

Condition Index) slightly above the District FCI (22.8%).

Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan Construct an eight-classroom addition at one

elementary school. Construct an eight-classroom addition at one

middle school. Address priorities 1 & 2 and functional equity

improvements. Community Impact Consult with the community regarding boundary

adjustments. Cost Savings NA

Exemplary Doss ES Hill ES Summitt ES

Recognized Davis ES Murchison MS Anderson HS

Elementary School Capacity 2,633 Elementary Migration IN - 478Elementary School Population 2,731 Elementary Migration OUT - 166Excess / (Deficient) Seats (98) Net Migration - 312

Middle School Capacity 1,113 Middle School Migration IN - 220Middle School Population 1,171 Middle School Migration OUT - 110Excess / (Deficient) Seats (58) Net Mirgation - 110

High School Capacity 2,017 High School Migration IN - 391High School Population 1,962 High School Migration OUT - 257Excess / (Deficient) Seats 55 Net Migration - 134

Acceptable None

Page 18

EXHIBIT "B"


AREA 2 – NORTH CENTRAL Lanier High School Burnet and Dobie middle schools Barrington, Cook, Graham, Hart, McBee,

Pillow, Walnut Creek, Wooldridge, Wooten elementary schools and Read Pre-K Center

Area Issues Based on the number of students living in the area for the 2010-11 school year:

The area has a severe deficiency in the number of seats available at the elementary school levels.

The number of students migrating out of the area is higher than the number of students migrating in, especially at the elementary and high school levels.

Space Utilization Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area: Nine elementary schools, Barrington, Cook,

Graham, Hart, McBee, Read, Walnut Creek, Wooldridge and Wooten, are severely overcrowded (above 125% of permanent capacity)

One elementary school, Pillow, is overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of permanent capacity)

One middle school, Burnet, is in the target range of percent of permanent capacity(between 85% and 105%), while one middle school, Dobie, is under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity)

The high school, Lanier, is in the target range of percent of permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%)


Future Growth Highest population growth in district is

projected in this area in the next five years Facility Condition On average, the facilities have an FCI slightly

less than the District FCI (22.8%), with two

Recognized Cook ES Hart ES McBee ES Wooten ES Dobie MS

Exemplary Graham ES Pillow ES

Acceptable Barrington ES Walnut Creek ES Wooldridge ES Burnet MS Lanier HS

Elementary School Capacity 5,568 Elementary Migration IN - 641Elementary School Population 8,370 Elementary Migration OUT - 1,587Excess / (Deficient) Seats (2,802) Net Migration (946)

Middle School Capacity 1,941 Middle School Migration IN - 123Middle School Population 1,889 Middle School Migration OUT - 333Excess / (Deficient) Seats 52 Net Migration (210)

High School Capacity 1,627 High School Migration IN - 121High School Population 1,981 High School Migration OUT - 557Excess / (Deficient) Seats (354) Net Migration (436)

Page 19

EXHIBIT "B"


elementary schools and one middle school requiring more extensive renovations.

Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan Construct two additional elementary schools. Construct eight-classroom additions at two

elementary schools. Address priorities 1 & 2 and functional equity

improvements. Community Impact

Consult with the community regarding middle school redesign.

Consult with the community regarding boundary adjustments.

Cost Savings NA

AREA 3 – CENTRAL WEST McCallum High School Lamar Middle School Brentwood, Brown, Bryker Woods, Casis,

Gullett, Highland Park, Lee, Mathews, Reilly and Ridgetop elementary schools

Pease Elementary School* Area Issues


The area has available seats at all school levels.


Attendance zone population under 300 students at three elementary schools, Matthews, Pease, and Ridgetop.

There are three elementary schools, Bryker Woods, Pease and Ridgetop that have a permanent capacity of less than 300 seats.

Permanent capacity for the middle and high schools are within target ranges.

The Fine Arts Academy at McCallum HS results in a higher “in” migration at the high school level.

Elementary School Capacity 4,336 Elementary Migration IN - 1,197Elementary School Population 4,025 Elementary Migration OUT - 565Excess / (Deficient) Seats 311 Net Migration - 632

Middle School Capacity 1,008 Middle School Migration IN - 223Middle School Population 583 Middle School Migration OUT - 191Excess / (Deficient) Seats 425 Net Migration - 32

High School Capacity 1,596 High School Migration IN - 795High School Population 1,316 High School Migration OUT - 296Excess / (Deficient) Seats 280 Net Migration - 499

Page 20

EXHIBIT "B"


Space Utilization Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area:

Two elementary schools, Bryker Woods and Gullett, are severely overcrowded (above 125% of permanent capacity).

One elementary school, Casis, is overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of permanent capacity)

Three elementary schools, Brown, Highland Park and Ridgetop, are over capacity (between 105% and 115% of permanent capacity)

Four elementary schools, Lee, Mathews Pease, and Reilly, are within the target range of percent of permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%)

One elementary school, Brentwood, is under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity)

The middle school, Lamar, is under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity)

The high school, McCallum, is overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of permanent capacity)


Future Growth Moderate population growth is projected in

this area in the next five years. Facility Condition

On average, the facilities have an FCI slightly higher than the District FCI (22.8%), with two elementary schools requiring more extensive renovations.

Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan Address priorities 1 & 2 and functional equity

improvements. Consolidate/close one elementary school.

Community Impact Consult with community regarding the use of

closed/consolidated elementary school. Consult with community if boundary

adjustments are needed. Cost Savings

Cost savings for closure of one elementary school is $700,000 in M&O savings.

Capital cost avoidance –$8.1M if one elementary school was closed / consolidated.

*Pease Elementary School does not have an attendance boundary and receives transfer students from all parts of the District, therefore its capacity, enrollment, and in-migration counts are not included in the area summaries.

Exemplary Casis ES Gullett ES Highland Park ES Lee ES Matthews ES Pease ES Ridgetop ES

Recognized Brentwood ES Bryker Woods ES Reilly ES

Acceptable Brown ES Lamar MS McCallum HS

Page 21

EXHIBIT "B"


AREA 4 – NORTHEAST LASA, LBJ and Reagan high schools Garcia, Pearce and Webb middle schools, Andrews, Blanton, Harris, Jordan, Maplewood,

Overton, Pecan Springs, Pickle and Winn elementary schools

Area Issues Based on the number of students living in the area for the 2010-11 school year: The area has available seats at the middle and

high school levels, but is deficient at the elementary school level.

The number of students migrating out of the area is higher than the number of students migrating into the area at all levels, especially at the middle and high school levels.

The magnet program, LASA, located at LBJ High School attracts students from outside the LBJ attendance area.

Space Utilization Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area: Three elementary schools, Andrews, Harris

and Jordan, are severely overcrowded (above 125% of permanent capacity).

Four elementary schools, Maplewood, Overton, Pecan Springs, and Pickle are overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of permanent capacity).

Two elementary schools, Blanton and Winn, are within the target range of percent of permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%).

All three middle schools, are under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity).

One high school, Reagan, is under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity), while LBJ and LASA are within the target range of percent of permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%)

Educational Enhancement New Programs for 2011-12: Early College Prep at one middle school Early College High School / Early College

Start at two high schools Academic Ratings:

Exemplary Blanton ES LASA HS

Recognized Andrews ES Harris ES Jordan ES Overton ES Pickle ES Winn ES

Acceptable Maplewood ES Pecan Springs ES Garcia MS Pearce MS Webb MS LBJ HS Reagan HS

Elementary School Capacity 4,918 Elementary Migration IN - 741Elementary School Population 5,743 Elementary Migration OUT - 907Excess / (Deficient) Seats (825) Net Migration - (166)

Middle School Capacity 3,097 Middle School Migration IN - 93Middle School Population 2,272 Middle School Migration OUT - 665Excess / (Deficient) Seats 825 Net Mirgation - (572)

High School Capacity 3,430 High School Migration IN - 247High School Population 2,635 High School Migration OUT - 1,018Excess / (Deficient) Seats 795 Net Migration - (771)

Page 22

EXHIBIT "B"


Future Growth Significant population growth is projected in

this area in the next five years. Facility Condition On average, the facilities have an FCI (Facility

Condition Index) lower than the District FCI (22.8%), with two elementary schools requiring more extensive renovations

Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan Construct one elementary school. Construct an eight classroom addition at one

elementary school. Close /consolidate one middle school. Adjust boundaries between elementary

schools. Address priorities 1 & 2 and functional equity

improvements. Community Impact Consult with community regarding plans for

closure/consolidation of one middle school and its repurposing.

Cost Savings Cost savings for closure of one middle school is

$1.8M in M&O savings. Capital cost avoidance –$7.4M if one middle

school was closed / consolidated.

AREA 5 – CENTRAL EAST Eastside Memorial High School at the Johnston

Campus - Global Tech. , Green Tech., and International high schools

Kealing and Martin middle schools Allan, Allison, Blackshear, Brooke, Campbell,

Govalle, Metz, Norman, Oak Springs, Ortega, Sanchez, Sims and Zavala elementary schools

Garza Independence High School* and the Alternative Learning Center (ALC)


The area has available seats at all school levels. The number of students migrating out of the area is

higher than the number of students migrating into the area at the elementary and high schools levels. The magnet program at Kealing MS results in a higher “in” migration at the middle school level.

Attendance zone populations are under 300 students at three elementary schools, Blackshear, Oak Springs and Ortega.

Permanent capacity for all schools is within target ranges.

International High School provides programs for limited English speaking high school students who qualify.

Elementary School Capacity 6,639 Elementary Migration IN - 665Elementary School Population 5,173 Elementary Migration OUT - 810Excess / (Deficient) Seats 1,466 Net Migration - (145)

Middle School Capacity 2,136 Middle School Migration IN - 881Middle School Population 1,597 Middle School Migration OUT - 493Excess / (Deficient) Seats 539 Net Migration - 388

High School Capacity 1,548 High School Migration IN - 125High School Population 1,249 High School Migration OUT - 955Excess / (Deficient) Seats 299 Net Migration - (830)Page 23

EXHIBIT "B"


Space Utilization Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area: One elementary school, Allison, is over

capacity (between 105% and 115% of permanent capacity)

Three elementary schools, Brooke, Metz and Sanchez, are within the target range of percent of permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%)

Nine elementary schools, Allan, Blackshear, Campbell, Govalle, Norman, Oak Springs, Ortega, Sims and Zavala are under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity)

One middle school, Kealing, is within the target range of permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%), while Martin is under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity).

The high school, Eastside Memorial, is under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity).


Future Growth No significant population growth is projected

in this area in the next five years. Facility Condition

On average, the facilities have an FCI above the District FCI (22.8%), with three elementary schools and one secondary schools requiring more extensive renovations.

There are significant structural issues at the Alternative Learning Center (ALC).

Facility Master Plan Task Force for 10-Year Plan Consolidate / close four elementary schools. Construct one replacement elementary

school. Address priorities 1 & 2 and functional equity

improvements. Community Impact Consult with community to discuss use /

repurposing of elementary schools to be closed and the relocation of ALC.

Cost Savings M & O savings ($5.1M) could be realized if

four elementary schools were closed / consolidated.

Capital cost avoidance - $25.2M if four elementary schools were closed / consolidated; however, it would cost $28M to construct a replacement elementary school.

*Garza Independence High School and the Alternative Learning Center do not have attendance boundaries and receive transfer students from all parts of the District, therefore their capacity, enrollment, and in-migration counts are not included in the area summaries.

Exemplary Metz ES Oak Springs ES Ortega ES Sims ES

Recognized Brooke ES Norman ES Sanchez ES Zavala ES

Acceptable Allan ES Allison ES Blackshear ES Campbell ES Govalle ES Kealing MS Martin MS Eastside Global HS Garza Independence HS

Unacceptable Eastside Green HS

Page 24

EXHIBIT "B"


AREA 6 – CENTRAL Austin and Travis high schools Fulmore and O. Henry middle schools Barton Hills, Becker, Dawson, Linder, Travis

Heights and Zilker elementary schools


The area has available seats at all school levels. The number of students migrating into the area is

higher than the number of students migrating out of the area at the elementary and middle school levels. There are slightly more students migrating out of the area at the high school level.

Attendance zone populations are under 300 students at three elementary schools, Barton Hills, Becker and Dawson.

One elementary school, Barton Hills, has a permanent capacity of less than 300 seats.

Space Utilization Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area: Two elementary schools, Barton Hills and

Linder, are severely overcrowded (above 125% of permanent capacity)

Two elementary schools, Travis Heights and Zilker, are over capacity (between 105% and 115% of permanent capacity).

Two elementary school, Becker and Dawson, are under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity)

One middle school, O.Henry, is overcrowded (above 125% of permanent capacity), while Fulmore is within the target range of permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%).

One high school, Austin, is overcrowded (above 125% of permanent capacity), while Travis is under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity).

Educational Enhancement

Academic Ratings:

Exemplary Barton Hills ES Becker ES Dawson ES Zilker ES

Recognized Linder ES Travis Heights ES Austin HS

Acceptable Fulmore MS O.Henry MS Travis HS

Elementary School Capacity 2,768 Elementary Migration IN - 729Elementary School Population 2,547 Elementary Migration OUT - 433Excess / (Deficient) Seats 221 Net Migration - 296


High School Capacity 4,067 High School Migration IN - 936High School Population 3,860 High School Migration OUT - 1,126Excess / (Deficient) Seats 207 Net Migration - (187)

Page 25

EXHIBIT "B"



this area, specifically within the Linder and Travis Heights attendance zones.

Facility Condition With the exception of one elementary with a

high FCI, on average, the facilities have an FCI above the the district average (22.8), with three elementary schools and one middle school requiring more extensive renovations.

Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan Consolidate/close two elementary schools. Address priorities 1& 2 and functional equity

improvements. Community Impact

Consult with the community regarding the use closed/consolidated elementary school(s).

Cost Savings • M&O savings for two elementary schools -

$2.2M. • Capital cost avoidance for three elementary

schools- $17.5M.

AREA 7 – SOUTHWEST Bowie High School Bailey, Gorzycki and Small middle schools Baldwin, Baranoff, Clayton, Kiker, Mills, Oak Hill and

Patton elementary schools Area Issues

Based on the number of students living in the area for the 2010-11 school year: The area has available seats at the middle school

level, and is slightly deficient at the elementary and high schools levels.


Space Utilization

Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area: Three elementary schools, Kiker, Mills and Patton,

are overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of permanent capacity)

One elementary school, Baranoff, is over capacity (between 105% and 115% of permanent capacity).

Elementary School Capacity 5,392 Elementary Migration IN - 633Elementary School Population 5,727 Elementary Migration OUT - 545Excess / (Deficient) Seats (335) Net Migration - 88


High School Capacity 2,535 High School Migration IN - 505High School Population 2,606 High School Migration OUT - 231Excess / (Deficient) Seats (71) Net Migration - 274

Page 26

EXHIBIT "B"


Two elementary schools, Clayton and Oak Hill, are within the target range of percent of permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%)

One elementary school, Baldwin, is under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity)

One middle school, Bailey, is within the target range of percent of permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%).

Two middle schools, Gorzycki and Small are under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity)

One high school, Bowie, is over capacity (between 105% and 115% of permanent capacity).



this area at the elementary and middle school levels.

Facility Condition On average, the facilities have an FCI well

below the District FCI (22.8%). Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan Construct an eight-classroom addition at one

elementary school. Adjust boundaries among elementary

schools. Address priorities 1 & 2 and functional equity

improvements. Community Impact Consult with community regarding boundary

adjustments. Cost Savings NA

Recognized Bailey MS Bowie HS Gorzycki MS Small MS

No Rating Baldwin ES

Exemplary Baranoff ES Clayton ES Kiker ES Mills ES Oak Hill ES Patton ES

Acceptable None

Page 27

EXHIBIT "B"


AREA 8 - SOUTH Crockett High School, Bedichek and Covington middle schools, Boone, Cunningham, Galindo, Joslin, St. Elmo

and Sunset Valley elementary schools The Ann Richards School for Young Women

Leaders* Area Issues


• The area has available seats at the elementary and high school levels, and is slightly deficient at the middle schools level.

The number of students migrating out of the area is higher than the number of students migrating into the area, especially at the middle and high school levels.

Space Utilization

Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area: Two elementary schools, Galindo and Joslin,

are within the target range of permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%).

Four elementary schools, Boone, Cunningham, St. Elmo and Sunset Valley, are

under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity).

One middle school, Bedichek, is over capacity (between 105% and 115% of permanent capacity) while Covington is under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity.

The high school, Crockett, is under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity).

Educational Enhancements

Academic Ratings:

Future Growth Moderate population growth projected in

the area. Facility Condition On average, the facilities have an FCI above

the District FCI (22.8%) with four elementary schools and one middle school requiring more extensive renovations.

Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan Consolidate/close one elementary school. Adjust boundaries between high schools

(Akins and Crockett). Address Priorities 1 & 2 and functional equity

improvements.

Exemplary Joslin ES Sunset Valley ES The Ann Richard School for Young Women Leaders

Recognized Boone ES Galindo ES St. Elmo ES

Acceptable Cunningham ES Bedichek MS Covington MS Crockett HS

Elementary School Capacity 3,436 Elementary Migration IN - 566Elementary School Population 2,921 Elementary Migration OUT - 656Excess / (Deficient) Seats 515 Net Migration - (90)

Middle School Capacity 2,066 Middle School Migration IN - 281Middle School Population 2,124 Middle School Migration OUT - 508Excess / (Deficient) Seats (58) Net Migration - (227)

High School Capacity 2,163 High School Migration IN - 285High School Population 1,883 High School Migration OUT - 510Excess / (Deficient) Seats 280 Net Migration - (225)

Page 28

EXHIBIT "B"


Community Impact Consult with the community regarding

closure and repurposing of elementary school.

Cost Savings Cost savings for closure of elementary school

is $1.26M in M&O savings. Capital cost avoidance –$8.4M.

*The Ann Richards School does not have an attendance boundary and receives transfer students from all parts of the District, therefore its capacity, population, and in-migration counts are not included in the area summaries.

AREA 9 – SOUTHEAST

Mendez Middle School, Blazier, Houston, Langford, Palm, Perez,

Rodriguez and Widen elementary schools Area Issues


The area is severely deficient in the number of seats at the elementary level, and is slightly deficient at the middle school level.

The number of students migrating out of the area is higher than the number of students migrating into the area.

Space Utilization

Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area: Four elementary schools, Blazier, Houston, Perez

and Rodriguez, are severely overcrowded (over 125% of permanent capacity).

Two elementary schools, Langford and Widen, are overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of permanent capacity).

One elementary school, Palm, is within the target range of percent of permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%).

The middle school, Mendez, is under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity).

There is no high school in this area.

Elementary School Capacity 4,637 Elementary Migration IN - 503Elementary School Population 6,109 Elementary Migration OUT - 865Excess / (Deficient) Seats (1,472) Net Migration - (362)


Page 29

EXHIBIT "B"


Education Enhancement Academic Ratings:


this area. Facility Condition On average, the facilities have an FCI that is

below the District FCI (22.8%), with one elementary school requiring more extensive renovations.

Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan Evaluate reduction of portables at middle

school. Construct eight-classroom additions at two

elementary schools. Adjust boundaries among area elementary

schools to reduce overcrowding. Adjust boundaries among area middle

schools. Address priority 1& 2 and functional equity

improvements Community Impact Consult with the community regarding

elementary and middle school boundary adjustments.

Cost Savings NA

AREA 10 – FAR SOUTH Akins High School Paredes Middle School Casey, Cowan, Kocurek, Menchaca, Odom,

Pleasant Hill and Williams elementary schools Area Issues


The area is deficient is the number of seats at the elementary and high school levels.

The number of students migrating out of the area is higher than the number of students migrating into the area, especially at the middle and high school levels.

Space Utilization Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area: Three elementary schools, Cowan, Odom and

Pleasant Hill, are overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of permanent capacity).

Two elementary schools, Menchaca and Williams, are over capacity (between 105% and 115% permanent capacity). Two elementary schools, Casey and

Kocurek, are within the target range of

Recognized Houston ES Palm ES Perez ES

Acceptable Blazier ES Langford ES Rodriguez ES Mendez MS Widen ES

Elementary School Capacity 4,286 Elementary Migration IN - 773Elementary School Population 4,819 Elementary Migration OUT - 873Excess / (Deficient) Seats (533) Net Migration - (100)


High School Capacity 2,394 High School Migration IN - 176High School Population 3,092 High School Migration OUT - 596Excess / (Deficient) Seats (698) Net Migration - (420)

Exemplary None

Page 30

EXHIBIT "B"


percent of permanent capacity (between 85% and 105%).

The middle school, Paredes, is under enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity).

The high school, Akins, is over capacity (between 105% and 115% of permanent capacity).

Educational Enhancement

Academic Ratings:

Future Growth No significant population growth is projected in

the area for the elementary and middle school levels; however, continued moderate growth is projected at the high school level.

Facility Condition On average, the facilities have an FCI below

the District FCI (22.8%), with two elementary schools requiring more extensive renovations.

Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan Priority 1& 2 and functional equity

improvements. Adjust boundaries between high schools

(Akins and Crockett to reduce overcrowding).

Community Impact Consult with community regarding high

school boundary adjustments and possible elementary boundary adjustments.

Cost Savings NA

Exemplary Cowan ES

Recognized Akins HS Paredes MS

Acceptable Casey ES Kocurek ES Menchaca ES Odom ES Pleasant Hill ES Williams ES

Page 31

EXHIBIT "B"

District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011 Additional Recommendations The Facilities Master Plan Task Force recommends the following District-wide initiatives and policy recommendations. Some recommendations may require additional planning and research from other AISD departments and outside entities. The Task Force does not want to lose sight of these very important ideas and recognizes that the Facility Master Plan is a dynamic document and should be updated periodically to incorporate building improvements, updates in community demographics, and changes in educational programming.

I. Policy Recommendations

1. Consider school closures only after all other alternatives and options, both programmatic and facilities use, have been thoroughly examined and discussed with the affected communities.

2. Create a community engagement process, led

by the Superintendent and the Senior Leadership Team, to work directly with the local community as part of the implementation planning process.

3. Establish a standing committee of parents,

teachers, district staff, and other stakeholders (e.g., City, Chamber of Commerce, realtors) to track and maintain the Facility Master Plan over time.

4. Conduct campus assessments for future bond

work in consultation with each school's Campus Advisory Council to ensure accurate, first-hand knowledge of campus conditions and priorities. For continuity, each campus will maintain a Facilities Improvement Plan documenting prior campus evaluations, including a Principal's Log, in which the principal or his/her designee will record relevant discussions regarding how the campus facilities are functioning and note any concerns for future administrators and CACs.

5. When new schools or consolidations are being

considered, first evaluate existing District sites (both presently undeveloped or in use) and determine if any are candidates for new construction, renovation, or re-construction. This may assist the District in locating schools in better locations than can be achieved with the purchase of new land.

6. Continue to identify ways to improve

collaborative planning with the City of Austin. The Austin ISD, City of Austin, and Travis County have adopted a joint resolution that specifically commits these entities to collaborative planning efforts including the AISD Facility Master Plan and the City’s Comprehensive Plan.

7. Initiate a District-wide boundary assessment and

possible realignment beginning January 2012 to

Page 32

EXHIBIT "B"


balance enrollment and improve vertical alignment.

8. District Departments/staff should be moved into

available spaces at under-utilized schools so that the District may sell valuable property, avoid leasing buildings and allow for all schools to remain open.

9. Aggressively pursue joint-use opportunities for

existing underutilized campuses, as well as new facilities; potential partners include the City of Austin, Central Health/CommUnityCare, and arts organizations and other nonprofit organizations.

10. Closed schools should be reused by the District or

another governmental entity for office/ administrative use, or by another educational user, and then returned to use as AISD instructional space when student population growth makes it prudent.

11. Review current District transfer policies and

implementation, in particular using campus’ “permanent capacity”, as opposed to “functional capacity” when evaluating available space.

12. Analyze current “out migration” trends from

campus/zones to understand the underlying issues, AND then address those issues in order to support the return of students to their neighborhood schools.

13. Conduct a complete review of the day-to-day

application of the district's transfer policy, regardless of overcrowding or underutilization. Include the impact that “out migration” can have on under-utilized schools as much as “in migration can impact overcrowded schools.

14. Support the neighborhood school model.

II. Management Recommendations

15. Institute a well-defined system for handling

maintenance requests that is communicated in writing to all staff at the start of each school year including:

how and to whom to report a maintenance issue, and how to receive the estimated time for a response, how to track a maintenance request

electronically in real time, who to contact if the contractor or

maintenance person fails to arrive, what to do if work is poorly completed or is

incomplete, and who is responsible for signing off on

completed work. III. Staffing Recommendations

16. Develop a plan to supervise custodians centrally

to allow more flexibility in the use of resources, reduce overtime costs through flexible

Page 33

EXHIBIT "B"


scheduling, improved supervision and quality control, and improved facility scheduling and energy management.

17. Consolidate maintenance functions, including field maintenance for athletic fields, under the Maintenance Department to provide more efficient and flexible use of available resources.

IV. Energy Efficiency Recommendations

18. Implement a centrally supervised summer

custodial program to achieve cost reductions by returning some custodians on each campus, through attrition, to a 10-month employment year.

19. Continue the current District focus on energy

usage reduction through more efficient equipment, technology applications to manage the operation of buildings more effectively, and engagement of campus and facility occupants to assist working toward the goal of reduced usage.

20. Continue efforts toward a coordinated shutdown

of facilities in the summer months as is feasible. 21. As soon as feasible, fund energy coordinator

position to implement and monitor energy savings initiatives at campuses. Savings generated from funding this position would more than offset the cost.

22. Implement an educational campaign to raise or lower thermostats in schools four degrees. (Estimates based on examples project savings of between 5% and 20%.)

23. Continue to upgrade and improve data and

systems to measure utility usage by campus.

V. Maintenance Recommendations

24. Institute bond counsel-approved strategies to designate funds for building system renovations in future bond programs to protect the District’s capital investments.

25. Include furniture and equipment replacement

schedule in the next bond program scope of work; invest in high quality equipment that will not require frequent maintenance or replacement.

26. Institute industry-standard performance measures

for bond programs, per the 2009 MGT Efficiency Study, to maintain and publish the following types of data: cost per foot of construction projects compared to peer districts and regional and national averages, final estimate compared to final bid, change-order rate, completion schedules, consultant ratings.

Page 34

EXHIBIT "B"

District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011 VI. Design Recommendations

27. Engage in public/private partnerships in the siting,

engineering, and design of “healthy” schools and neighborhood environments that support increased outdoor physical activities for children and their families.

28. Explore flexible design for future school facilities to

accommodate population fluctuations. Some strategies include implementing consistent building designs with modular components that may expand or contract with student population changes, or using a Mobile Technology unit that allows specialized equipment to be shared by two or more campuses for a portion of a year.

29. Create flexible learning spaces, where students

can work in groups utilizing the wireless network with portable devices.

30. Design large-scale facilities to provide suitable

space for multiple uses such as conferences, meetings, and professional development (ideally in conjunction with other local governmental partners to share costs and maintenance).

31. Design, construct and operate high-performance

schools and other facilities that are sensitive to natural resource use, conserve energy and water, reduce pollution and waste, promote and attract active transportation by healthy outdoor design that includes, but is not limited to, bicycle

racks for students within a two-mile radius of a campus and outdoor space designed for multi-purpose neighborhood and community use.

32. The site selection process for high-performance

schools and other faculties should include a matrix that rewards the availability of mass transportation options that include, but are not limited to, Capital Metro buses, commuter rail, and metro rail to reduce transportation costs and the carbon footprint of a facility.

33. To avoid the costs of building and maintaining

additional high schools, pursue options such as 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. schedules that offer challenging curriculums, distance learning, and advanced placement courses. Online courses could also be more widely implemented and available to all students.

VII. Safety and Security Recommendations

34. Make safe walkable routes a priority when constructing or repurposing school facilities.

35. Assess nighttime security and add security

cameras and lighting in high need areas. 36. Work with appropriate entities to encourage

construction of fences and barriers at railroad crossings.

Page 35

EXHIBIT "B"


37. Ensure the installation of adequate public address and alarm systems in all schools, including all portables.

38. Address campus traffic issues as identified by the

campus. VIII. Use Recommendations

39. Increase building rental rates to increase cost-recovery for community use of schools.

40. Appropriately consolidate students in underutilized

campuses to make available as much classroom space as possible, and issue Requests for Proposals to identify educational groups or childcare providers interested in leasing excess space and assuming or sharing maintenance and operation costs.

41. Implement an aggressive marketing campaign to

rent the Burger Activity and Delco Activity centers to interested parties for conferences, athletic events, and other activities.

IX. Technology Recommendations

42. Design “Twenty-first Century Classrooms,” media

rich classrooms with projectors, audio system, document cameras, and interactive tools.

43. Expand the staff use of online meeting software

(live video/audio/screen sharing) to facilitate

communication and allow people in different spaces to be in the same space virtually. “Green” meetings reduce employee travel time and have a smaller carbon footprint.

44. Institute cloud computing with anytime/anywhere

access that works with all computer types and devices.

45. Use Web 2.0 tools to communicate, collaborate,

and create. 46. Use tools such as video “chat” to expand beyond

the classroom (i.e., virtual field trips, interactions with other students from across town, or across the globe).

47. Create a single web entry point (portal) with single

sign-on for all student and teacher resources in one place.

48. Increase use of online assessment tools to receive

results more quickly and reduce paper usage, i.e., dashboards.

49. Improve access to meaningful student data to

guide instructional decisions. 50. Create online courses for students and teacher

professional development which would be conducted entirely online and blended with face- to-face and online contact.

Page 36

EXHIBIT "B"


51. Increase use of mobile computing (including personal devices such as smart phones) and mobile devices (netbooks). Fewer desktop computers (use less energy, smaller foot print,), less need for dedicated traditional computer lab.

X. Other Recommendations

52. Assess administrative fees for general, sibling, or

tracking school transfers, with no fee for students qualified for free and reduced lunch, and with provisions for hardship waivers.

53. Consider the feasibility of sharing administrative staff or resources and services among small campuses.

54. Determine cost effectiveness of duplicating

special programs in different areas of the District versus providing transportation to a single program.

Page 37

EXHIBIT "B"

District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report – 03/28/2011 Facility Summary Data Reports with Facility Master Plan Recommendations

The following pages include a summary of each facility with the information listed below, in alphabetical order by school type (ES, MS, HS). Support facilities are included subsequent to the school summaries.

School ID number, name, and address Grades served Permanent and portable/temporary square

footage Number of classrooms Permanent Capacity 2010-11 Enrollment 2010-11 Attendance Zone Population

2015-16 Projected Attendance Zone Population 2010-11 In Migration 2010-11 Out Migration Site size and number of parking spaces Individual building data Facility condition data Deficiency costs by building system and priority Facility master plan recommendations

Page 38

EXHIBIT "B"

School Summary Report2010 Educational Suitability Assessment

M▪A▪P▪P▪S ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011

142

Allan ES

142 Allan Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

2010-11 Utilization (by population) 53%

2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 354 319

Excess/Deficit Seats

2010-11 Out Migration 031

2010-11 In Migration 057

2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 364 309

Utilization (by enrollment) 56% Percent of Capacity

Area (GSF) per student 297 0 297

Gross Area 112,608 112,608

Perm Temp Total

2010-11 Campus Enrollment 379

Permanent Capacity 673

Number of Classrooms 42 0 42

Parking Spaces 72

Gross Site Area (Acres) 19.5

Site Data

School Data

Mechanical 1 1957 1,092 27.6%

Building B 1 1958 10,577 35.3%

Building A 1 1957 100,939 30.3%

Perm Buildings 112,608Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI

Building Data

30.3%

Austin, Texas 78702 1957 AA No

4900 Gonzales Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $85,828 $1,489,567 $287,683 $21,979 - $1,885,057

Specialties - - $369,686 $80,329 - $450,015

Interior - - $457,357 $323,054 - $780,411

Plumbing $802,337 - $1,423,834 $11,768 - $2,237,939

Conveyances - - - - - $0

Technology - $87,750 $494,081 - - $581,831

Fire & Life Safety $141,494 $98,779 $2,617 - - $242,889

Site - - $156,255 $85,341 - $241,597

Other $225,024 - $136,426 - $1,074,557 $1,436,007

Mechanical - $9,454 $520,512 - - $529,965

Exterior - $3,333 $2,797,431 $36,448 - $2,837,212

Structural - - - - - $0

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $1,254,683 $1,688,882 $6,645,881 $558,919 $1,074,557 $11,222,922

* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

Facility Condition - System by PriorityPriority

System 1 2 3 4 5 Total

Facility Master Plan Recommendations

Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,943,565*

District-wide Facility Master Plan Final Report - 03/28/2011


Page 39

EXHIBIT "B"



101

Allison ES

101 Allison Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)


2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 585 -99




2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 590 -104



Gross Area 61,426 7,680 69,106

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 61


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1955 61,426 21.6%


Building Data

20.4%


515 Vargas Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $230,499 $412,417 $11,881 - $654,797

Specialties - - $37,014 $73,394 - $110,407

Interior - $133,897 $256,139 $115,111 - $505,146

Plumbing - - $251,501 $9,629 - $261,130


Technology - $91,138 $447,192 - - $538,330

Fire & Life Safety $106,267 $72,572 $2,617 - - $181,456

Site - $2,222 $67,896 - - $70,119

Other $67,350 - $176,405 - $10,288 $254,043

Mechanical - $823,369 $742,003 - - $1,565,371

Exterior - $435 $49,328 - - $49,763


Roofing - - $7,992 - - $7,992

Total $173,617 $1,354,132 $2,450,503 $210,014 $10,288 $4,198,553








Page 40

EXHIBIT "B"



102

Andrews ES

102 Andrews Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 58,376 12,288 70,664

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 39


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1986 4,422 8.1%

Building A 1 1962 53,954 38.8%


Building Data

32.1%

Austin, Texas 78723 1962 RC No

6801 Northeast Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $260,909 $362,040 $35,208 - $658,157

Specialties - - $343,330 $83,069 - $426,399

Interior - $128,866 $530,543 $44,545 - $703,954

Plumbing $239,166 - $327,938 $5,350 - $572,454


Technology - $102,282 $476,976 - - $579,258

Fire & Life Safety $109,536 $73,733 - - - $183,268

Site - $54,271 $150,146 - - $204,417

Other $225,239 - $255,049 - $1,517,264 $1,997,552

Mechanical - $1,372,878 $1,042,888 $22,487 - $2,438,253

Exterior - $619,584 $13,720 - - $633,304


Roofing - $20,585 - - - $20,585

Total $573,941 $2,633,109 $3,502,631 $190,659 $1,517,264 $8,417,604








Page 41

EXHIBIT "B"



187

Baldwin ES

187 Baldwin Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 86,751 86,751

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces

Gross Site Area (Acres) .0

Site Data

School Data

Building A 2 2010 86,751


Building Data

0.0%

, Texas 0 No

Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - - - - $0

Specialties - - - - - $0

Interior - - - - - $0

Plumbing - - - - - $0


Technology - - - - - $0

Fire & Life Safety - - - - - $0

Site - - - - - $0

Other - - - - - $0

Mechanical - - - - - $0

Exterior - - - - - $0


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0





Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $000*



Page 42

EXHIBIT "B"



182

Baranoff ES

182 Baranoff Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)









Gross Area 80,088 6,144 86,232

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 84


Site Data

School Data

Classroom 1 2008 10,996 5.8%

Building A 1 1999 69,092 13.2%


Building Data

11.0%

Austin, Texas 78748 1999 EX No

12009 Buckingham Gate Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $95,977 $24,556 - $120,533

Specialties - - $117,320 $225,980 - $343,300

Interior $926 $42,710 $270,307 $9,202 - $323,145

Plumbing - $24,586 $27,074 $18,259 - $69,920

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $278,827 $631,528 - - $910,355

Fire & Life Safety $126,088 $72,942 $2,617 - - $201,648

Site - - $9,548 - - $9,548

Other $70,859 - $89,370 - $121,554 $281,783

Mechanical - $57,841 $43,918 - - $101,759

Exterior - - $5,556 - - $5,556


Roofing - $4,702 $521,184 - - $525,885

Total $197,873 $531,250 $1,814,399 $277,997 $121,554 $2,943,072





Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $729,123*



Page 43

EXHIBIT "B"



149

Barrington ES

149 Barrington Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)






2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,098 -444



Gross Area 78,971 21,504 100,475

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 68


Site Data

School Data

Building D 1 2010 12,794 0.0%

Building C 1 2010 100

Building B 1 1999 15,285 4.9%

Building A 1 1969 50,792 39.6%


Building Data

21.2%


400 Cooper Drive Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $22,712 $95,267 $180,328 $32,952 - $331,258

Specialties - - $183,446 $127,022 - $310,468

Interior - $11,761 $447,963 $46,058 - $505,782

Plumbing - - $354,720 $50,558 - $405,278

Conveyances - $198,566 - - - $198,566

Technology - $55,147 $523,988 - - $579,135

Fire & Life Safety $143,452 $84,850 - - - $228,302

Site - $7,043 $71,576 $54,752 - $133,371

Other $104,890 - $205,872 - $2,708,483 $3,019,245

Mechanical $58,895 $16,736 $3,233,378 - - $3,309,009

Exterior - - $19,209 - - $19,209


Roofing - $7,091 - - - $7,091

Total $329,948 $476,461 $5,220,479 $311,342 $2,708,483 $9,046,714








Page 44

EXHIBIT "B"



103

Barton Hills ES

103 Barton Hills Elementary School Grades Served K-6 (ES)









Gross Area 38,291 10,752 49,043

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 43


Site Data

School Data

Band 1 2007 3,205 0.5%

Building B 1 1964 2,985 20.7%

Building A 1 1964 32,101 33.1%


Building Data

29.8%


2108 Barton Hills Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $24,143 $55,790 $367,319 $9,030 - $456,282

Specialties - - $136,751 $28,851 - $165,602

Interior - - $347,145 $9,067 - $356,211

Plumbing $144,398 - $155,949 $17,190 - $317,537

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $41,851 $188,065 - - $229,916

Fire & Life Safety $85,700 $65,351 - - - $151,052

Site - $4,606 $90,727 - - $95,333

Other $750,812 - $1,082,848 - $2,391 $1,836,051

Mechanical - $19,430 $167,197 - - $186,627

Exterior - - $82,715 $383,049 - $465,764

Structural $15,245 - $769 - - $16,014

Roofing $1,970 - $17,708 - - $19,678

Total $1,022,269 $236,671 $2,637,192 $447,186 $2,391 $4,345,708








Page 45

EXHIBIT "B"



104

Becker ES

104 Becker Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 59,670 3,072 62,742

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 0


Site Data

School Data

Building D 1 1936 1,099 23.9%

Building C 1 1936 1,237 21.4%

Mechanical 1 1939 499 26.9%

Building A 1 1936 56,835 39.2%


Building Data

38.1%

Austin, Texas 78704 1936 EX Yes

906 Milton St. West Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $174,132 $299,288 $7,366 - $480,786

Specialties - - $77,271 $99,315 - $176,585

Interior - $44,583 $185,934 $80,564 - $311,082

Plumbing $29,802 - $1,547,453 $16,046 - $1,593,301


Technology - $47,064 $354,610 - - $401,674

Fire & Life Safety $94,218 $62,525 - - - $156,743

Site - $4,927 $342,183 $2,225 - $349,335

Other $89,415 - $170,111 - $118,363 $377,889

Mechanical $901,466 $1,168,099 $599,661 - - $2,669,227

Exterior - - $8,103 $19,303 - $27,407

Structural - $7,792 - - - $7,792

Roofing - $608,432 $37,370 $28,130 - $673,931

Total $1,114,902 $2,117,554 $3,621,985 $252,949 $118,363 $7,225,752








Page 46

EXHIBIT "B"

105 Blackshear Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)

Perm Temp Total

Gross Area 70,726 70,726













Parking Spaces 52

Site Data

School Data


Building A 1 1903 70,726 34.3%

Building Data

35.0%

1712 East 11th St. Yr. Open Rating HistoricAustin, Texas 78702 1903 AA Yes

Facility Condition - System by Priority

Priority


Site - - $170,707 $95,689 - $266,396

Roofing - $1,423 $632,834 - - $634,256

Structural $4,394 - - - - $4,394

Exterior - $3,785 $452,580 $575,423 - $1,031,789

Interior $4,532 - $387,531 $3,206 - $395,269

Mechanical - $1,842,538 $922,533 - - $2,765,071

Electrical - $187,699 $578,074 $25,070 - $790,843

Plumbing - - $324,886 $10,698 - $335,584

Fire & Life Safety $101,399 $65,038 $2,617 - - $169,055

Technology - $77,782 $332,300 - - $410,082


Specialties - - $55,364 $86,450 - $141,814

Other $77,822 - $343,085 - $58,019 $478,927

Total $188,148 $2,178,265 $4,202,512 $796,536 $58,019 $7,423,480





105

Blackshear ES




Page 47

EXHIBIT "B"



106

Blanton ES

106 Blanton Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 71,817 10,752 82,569

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 75


Site Data

School Data

Greenhouse 1 2004 317 35.8%

Building C 1 2000 11,424 6.9%

Building B 1 1964 3,546 26.8%

Building A 1 1964 56,530 22.1%


Building Data

19.6%


5408 Westminster Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $145,055 $802,902 $7,524 - $955,481

Specialties - - $123,565 $145,047 - $268,613

Interior - $106,775 $200,675 $46,975 - $354,425

Plumbing $326,183 - $193,561 $31,163 - $550,906

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $53,729 $536,877 - - $590,606

Fire & Life Safety $124,149 $89,652 $2,617 - - $216,419

Site - - $288,274 - - $288,274

Other $192,446 - $84,158 - $59,146 $335,750

Mechanical - $587,738 $614,997 - - $1,202,735

Exterior - - $2,793 - - $2,793


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $642,778 $1,082,233 $2,850,419 $230,709 $59,146 $4,865,285








Page 48

EXHIBIT "B"



185

Blazier ES

185 Blazier Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 82,897 10,752 93,649

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 95


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 2008 82,897 4.6%


Building Data

5.1%


8601 Vertex Blvd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $23,877 $48,516 - $72,393

Specialties - - $31,404 $87,917 - $119,321

Interior - $64,065 $88,567 $12,027 - $164,658

Plumbing - - $138,990 $17,118 - $156,108


Technology - $69,732 $592,476 - - $662,208

Fire & Life Safety $125,254 $44,081 - - - $169,335

Site - - $508 $40,134 - $40,642

Other - - - - - $0

Mechanical $11,527 - - - - $11,527

Exterior - - - - - $0


Roofing - - $21,733 - - $21,733

Total $136,781 $177,879 $897,555 $205,711 $0 $1,417,926








Page 49

EXHIBIT "B"



170

Boone ES

170 Boone Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 73,690 73,690

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 82


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1998 10,017 7.9%

Building A 1 1986 63,673 18.5%


Building Data

17.5%


8101 Croftwood Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $38,018 $34,099 - $72,117

Specialties - - $104,863 $130,565 - $235,429

Interior - - $186,467 $50,972 - $237,439

Plumbing $109,823 - $214,827 $7,492 - $332,142


Technology - $54,170 $629,580 - - $683,750

Fire & Life Safety $105,015 $71,301 - - - $176,316

Site - - - $125,012 - $125,012

Other $273,625 - $246,609 - $318,391 $838,626

Mechanical $1,502 - $1,424,842 - - $1,426,344

Exterior - $9,899 - - - $9,899

Structural - - $9,058 - - $9,058

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $489,966 $135,370 $2,854,265 $348,141 $318,391 $4,146,133








Page 50

EXHIBIT "B"



107

Brentwood ES

107 Brentwood Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 62,891 3,072 65,963

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 68


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1951 572

Building A 1 1951 62,319 23.7%


Building Data

23.2%


6700 Arroyo Seco Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $203,390 $179,931 $27,524 - $410,846

Specialties - - $108,798 $106,218 - $215,016

Interior - $868 $682,430 $45,770 - $729,067

Plumbing - - $572,536 $10,701 - $583,236


Technology - $47,732 $448,626 - - $496,358

Fire & Life Safety $99,872 $69,505 - - - $169,376

Site $12,102 - $60,185 - - $72,287

Other $141,131 - $399,050 - $1,625,875 $2,166,056

Mechanical $33,509 $372,314 $787,027 - - $1,192,849

Exterior - - $134,776 - - $134,776

Structural - - $7,945 - - $7,945

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $286,613 $693,809 $3,381,304 $190,212 $1,625,875 $6,177,813








Page 51

EXHIBIT "B"



108

Brooke ES

108 Brooke Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 52,282 3,858 56,140

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 43


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1954 52,282 25.6%


Building Data

24.9%


3100 East 4th St. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $447,716 $142,618 $1,900 - $592,234

Specialties - - $42,894 $69,049 - $111,943

Interior - $42,710 $129,374 $149,501 - $321,585

Plumbing $291,538 - $311,932 $27,954 - $631,425

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $49,308 $406,816 - - $456,124

Fire & Life Safety $90,134 $66,443 - - - $156,577

Site - - $35,849 - - $35,849

Other $84,861 - $220,391 - $37,886 $343,138

Mechanical - - $1,327,384 - - $1,327,384

Exterior - - $89,580 $13,732 - $103,312

Structural - - $1,461 - - $1,461

Roofing - $23,223 - - - $23,223

Total $466,533 $728,683 $2,708,300 $262,136 $37,886 $4,203,538








Page 52

EXHIBIT "B"



109

Brown ES

109 Brown Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)









Gross Area 53,853 9,216 63,069

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 58


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1957 53,853 32.0%


Building Data

28.1%


505 W. Anderson Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $200,491 $97,915 $32,990 - $331,396

Specialties - - $78,323 $57,290 - $135,613

Interior - $106,775 $47,418 $499,529 - $653,722

Plumbing $433,368 - $712,305 $5,350 - $1,151,024


Technology - $48,342 $393,777 - - $442,119

Fire & Life Safety $106,953 $62,707 - - - $169,660

Site - - $25,359 $40,134 - $65,492

Other $85,828 - $84,704 - $2,665,997 $2,836,529

Mechanical - $734,839 $387,333 - - $1,122,172

Exterior - - $61,590 - - $61,590


Roofing $954,050 - $20,585 - - $974,635

Total $1,580,199 $1,153,153 $1,909,309 $635,293 $2,665,997 $7,943,951








Page 53

EXHIBIT "B"



110

Bryker Woods ES

110 Bryker Woods Elementary School Grades Served K-6 (ES)









Gross Area 37,517 9,216 46,733

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 33


Site Data

School Data

Multi-Use 1 1949 1,202

Multi-Use 1 1949 451 14.8%

Building B 1 1999 4,874 10.9%

Building A 1 1939 30,990 42.3%


Building Data

33.4%


3309 Kerbey Lane Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $5,774 $258,851 $193,752 $8,554 - $466,931

Specialties - - $72,714 $71,979 - $144,693

Interior - $85,420 $186,592 $86,382 - $358,394

Plumbing - - $595,420 $117,216 - $712,636


Technology - $41,472 $228,241 - - $269,714

Fire & Life Safety $76,664 $56,369 - - - $133,033

Site $11,503 $2,135 - $64,475 - $78,114

Other $95,470 - $320,072 - $44,654 $460,196

Mechanical - $671,437 $737,812 - - $1,409,249

Exterior - $3,842 $594,025 - - $597,867

Structural - - $585 - - $585

Roofing - - $49,869 - - $49,869

Total $189,411 $1,119,527 $2,979,081 $348,606 $44,654 $4,681,279








Page 54

EXHIBIT "B"



111

Campbell ES

111 Campbell Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 61,793 1,536 63,329

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 71


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1992 61,793 20.6%


Building Data

20.8%


2613 Rogers Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $79,714 $22,047 $21,308 - $123,068

Specialties - - $93,514 $102,707 - $196,221

Interior - $21,355 $141,699 $44,826 - $207,880

Plumbing - $5,673 $104,666 $8,562 - $118,900


Technology - $51,473 $480,195 - - $531,667

Fire & Life Safety $102,685 $61,978 $2,617 - - $167,280

Site $2,209 - $194,564 $19,758 - $216,531

Other $206,699 - $376,708 - $377,355 $960,762

Mechanical - $159,506 $1,609,266 - - $1,768,771

Exterior - - $1,436 - - $1,436

Structural - - $3,992 - - $3,992

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $311,592 $379,698 $3,030,703 $197,160 $377,355 $4,296,509








Page 55

EXHIBIT "B"



173

Casey ES

173 Casey Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 81,506 1,536 83,042

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 90


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1998 81,506 17.1%


Building Data

16.7%


9400 Texas Oaks Drive Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $55,790 $69,561 $20,517 - $145,867

Specialties - - $94,992 $168,573 - $263,566

Interior - $21,355 $103,475 $259,333 - $384,163

Plumbing - - $60,629 $9,631 - $70,260


Technology - $61,817 $571,009 - - $632,826

Fire & Life Safety $118,356 $70,205 $2,617 - - $191,179

Site - - $11,274 - - $11,274

Other $214,476 - $191,954 - $78,748 $485,178

Mechanical - $9,454 $175,204 - - $184,658

Exterior - - - - - $0


Roofing - - - $1,823,016 - $1,823,016

Total $332,832 $218,621 $1,280,715 $2,281,070 $78,748 $4,191,986








Page 56

EXHIBIT "B"



112

Casis ES

112 Casis Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 77,911 13,824 91,735

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 74


Site Data

School Data

Storage 1 1977 201

Building A 1 1951 77,710 17.8%


Building Data

17.4%


2710 Exposition Blvd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $1,398 $139,476 $502,223 $285,421 - $928,518

Specialties - - $280,357 $117,401 - $397,758

Interior - $158,014 $91,098 $192,609 - $441,722

Plumbing - - $883,640 $7,492 - $891,131


Technology - $37,504 $553,409 - - $590,913

Fire & Life Safety $52,902 $47,234 - - - $100,136

Site - - $110,394 $128,950 - $239,343

Other $221,207 - $237,731 - $60,579 $519,518

Mechanical $1,143 $225,633 $311,862 - - $538,638

Exterior - - $125,554 - - $125,554

Structural $3,372 - - - - $3,372

Roofing - $24,163 - - - $24,163

Total $280,022 $632,024 $3,096,268 $731,873 $60,579 $4,800,767








Page 57

EXHIBIT "B"



184

Clayton ES

184 Clayton Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)









Gross Area 99,921 6,144 106,065

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 80


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 2006 99,921 6.0%


Building Data

5.9%


7525 La Crosse Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $55,790 $15,442 $18,970 - $90,203

Specialties - - $144,232 $154,373 - $298,605

Interior - - $110,324 $11,953 - $122,276

Plumbing - - $40,274 $30,096 - $70,370

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $66,669 $727,735 - - $794,404

Fire & Life Safety $136,427 $66,371 - - - $202,798

Site - - $104,860 - - $104,860

Other - - - - - $0

Mechanical - $94,332 - - - $94,332

Exterior - - - - - $0


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $136,427 $382,446 $1,142,866 $215,392 $0 $1,877,130








Page 58

EXHIBIT "B"



161

Cook ES

161 Cook Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)


2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,252 -691







Gross Area 67,344 18,432 85,776

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 102


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1998 9,101 7.2%

Building A 1 1974 58,243 37.0%


Building Data

27.5%


1511 Cripple Creek Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $612 $112,040 $498,713 $41,308 - $652,673

Specialties - - $170,614 $60,771 - $231,385

Interior - $24,947 $292,679 $56,423 - $374,049

Plumbing $483,798 $7,984 $672,803 $17,116 - $1,181,702


Technology - $52,591 $514,759 - - $567,349

Fire & Life Safety $139,760 $77,796 - - - $217,556

Site $5,447 $368,828 $71,282 $99,999 - $545,557

Other $104,525 - $171,689 - $3,529,726 $3,805,940

Mechanical $113,579 $2,346,429 $305,774 - - $2,765,782

Exterior - $5,057 $13,275 - - $18,332

Structural - $27,464 $124,896 - - $152,360

Roofing - $23,862 - - - $23,862

Total $847,723 $3,046,998 $2,836,484 $275,616 $3,529,726 $10,536,548








Page 59

EXHIBIT "B"



183

Cowan ES

183 Cowan Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 70,234 9,216 79,450

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 84


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1999 70,234 8.1%


Building Data

9.1%


2817 Kentish Drive Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $5,580 $32,214 $45,189 - $82,983

Specialties - - $129,283 $76,537 - $205,820

Interior - $21,355 $195,024 $48,518 - $264,897

Plumbing - - $136,947 $23,607 - $160,554

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $53,321 $543,971 - - $597,292

Fire & Life Safety $122,086 $71,547 - - - $193,633

Site - $4,606 $18,655 $75,046 - $98,307

Other $318,918 - $50,165 - $287,289 $656,372

Mechanical - $76,432 - - - $76,432

Exterior - - - $770 - $770


Roofing - - $57,513 - - $57,513

Total $441,004 $282,482 $1,163,772 $269,668 $287,289 $2,444,215








Page 60

EXHIBIT "B"



113

Cunningham ES

113 Cunningham Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 71,600 21,504 93,104

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 62


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1990 9,722 33.0%

Building A 1 1963 61,878 43.2%


Building Data

34.3%


2200 Berkeley Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $1,233,513 $39,131 - $1,272,644

Specialties - - $111,536 $92,651 - $204,187

Interior - $2,068 $210,570 $46,250 - $258,889

Plumbing - $1,894 $2,411,481 $24,603 - $2,437,977


Technology - $53,939 $547,184 - - $601,123

Fire & Life Safety $118,092 $70,131 - - - $188,222

Site - - $779,622 $272,621 - $1,052,243

Other $56,081 - $392,715 - $3,523,663 $3,972,459

Mechanical - $74,272 $2,949,674 - - $3,023,946

Exterior $483 - $26,308 - - $26,791

Structural - $1,685 - - - $1,685

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $174,656 $203,988 $8,662,602 $475,256 $3,523,663 $13,040,166








Page 61

EXHIBIT "B"



179

Davis ES

179 Davis Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 72,149 4,608 76,757

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 104


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1999 9,981 4.9%

Building A 1 1993 62,168 28.5%


Building Data

23.3%


5214 Duval Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $44,631 $182,421 $45,586 - $272,638

Specialties - - $169,804 $82,961 - $252,764

Interior $1,219 $21,355 $1,112,754 $53,085 - $1,188,414

Plumbing - - $133,339 $20,398 - $153,737

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $53,631 $545,092 - - $598,723

Fire & Life Safety $107,138 $67,067 $2,617 - - $176,823

Site - - $1,852 $40,134 - $41,985

Other $267,589 - $529,587 - $172,691 $969,866

Mechanical - $9,454 $1,785,526 - - $1,794,980

Exterior - - - - - $0

Structural - - $3,372 - - $3,372

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $375,946 $245,779 $4,466,364 $242,164 $172,691 $5,502,944








Page 62

EXHIBIT "B"



154

Doss ES

154 Doss Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 60,228 12,288 72,516

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 73


Site Data

School Data

Bldg B 1 2009 4,646 0.6%

Building A 1 1970 55,582 34.4%


Building Data

26.2%


7005 Northledge Dr Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $16,736 $858,105 $30,101 - $904,942

Specialties - - $108,677 $126,691 - $235,368

Interior - - $401,625 $50,410 - $452,035

Plumbing - - $188,173 $15,048 - $203,221

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $49,792 $441,586 - - $491,378

Fire & Life Safety $109,107 $67,795 - - - $176,901

Site - $4,606 $68,518 $40,134 - $113,258

Other $168,386 - $49,256 - $585,467 $803,109

Mechanical - $1,559,129 $716,716 - - $2,275,844

Exterior - - $731 - - $731

Structural - $5,493 $68,609 - - $74,102

Roofing - - $464,424 - - $464,424

Total $277,493 $1,753,192 $3,366,419 $262,383 $585,467 $6,244,954








Page 63

EXHIBIT "B"



114

Dawson ES

114 Dawson Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 55,301 5,394 60,695

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 56


Site Data

School Data

Building C 1 1991 9,965 10.7%

Building B 1 1986 299 3.5%

Building A 1 1954 45,037 28.2%


Building Data

27.2%


3001 South 1st Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $535,848 $131,343 $15,763 - $682,954

Specialties - - $342,862 $91,722 - $434,584

Interior $27,673 $85,420 $121,022 $10,149 - $244,264

Plumbing - - $321,199 $6,420 - $327,619


Technology - $46,000 $474,418 - - $520,418

Fire & Life Safety $82,474 $63,151 - - - $145,625

Site - $236,494 $42,588 - - $279,082

Other $714,876 - $417,782 - $1,374,936 $2,507,593

Mechanical - $820,238 $195,656 - - $1,015,894

Exterior - - $58,409 - - $58,409

Structural - - $27,004 - - $27,004

Roofing - $1,297 $32,523 - - $33,821

Total $825,023 $1,788,448 $2,164,807 $124,053 $1,374,936 $6,277,266








Page 64

EXHIBIT "B"



176

Galindo ES

176 Galindo Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 85,482 7,680 93,162

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 98


Site Data

School Data

Mechanical 1 2001 900 91.0%

Building A 1 1989 84,582 10.0%


Building Data

11.4%


3800 S. 2nd St. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $551 $62,382 $47,347 $1,821 - $112,101

Specialties - - $182,951 $148,333 - $331,284

Interior - $87,858 $147,364 $46,940 - $282,163

Plumbing - - $70,598 $40,861 - $111,459

Conveyances - $148,924 - - - $148,924

Technology - $69,224 $647,749 - - $716,973

Fire & Life Safety $136,237 $76,517 - - - $212,754

Site - $4,218 $5,085 - - $9,303

Other $353,824 - $409,644 - $162,944 $926,412

Mechanical $227,913 $23,049 $210,340 - - $461,302

Exterior - - $3,160 - - $3,160


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $718,525 $472,173 $1,724,238 $237,955 $162,944 $3,315,834








Page 65

EXHIBIT "B"



116

Govalle ES

116 Govalle Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 77,638 77,638

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 71


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1940 501 172.8%

Building A 1 1940 77,137 30.5%


Building Data

30.9%


3601 Govalle Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $235,885 $82,607 $26,336 - $344,828

Specialties - - $164,526 $547,821 - $712,346

Interior - $11,544 $114,440 $804,011 - $929,995

Plumbing - $17,901 $1,297,172 $8,562 - $1,323,634


Technology - $67,933 $536,415 - - $604,348

Fire & Life Safety $116,822 $67,936 - - - $184,758

Site - $4,606 $43,809 - - $48,415

Other $223,311 - $380,254 - $3,711,107 $4,314,671

Mechanical - $711,013 $424,842 - - $1,135,855

Exterior - $17,361 $1,182,064 - - $1,199,425

Structural - $5,349 $10,309 - - $15,658

Roofing - - $33,366 - - $33,366

Total $340,133 $1,139,527 $4,269,803 $1,386,730 $3,711,107 $10,847,299








Page 66

EXHIBIT "B"



159

Graham ES

159 Graham Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 70,589 10,752 81,341

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 77


Site Data

School Data

Building C 1 2008 11,232 4.7%

Building B 1 1993 14,411 14.5%

Building A 1 1972 44,946 45.0%


Building Data

30.4%


11211 Tom Adams Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $262,635 $15,208 - $277,843

Specialties - $2,119 $83,054 $99,068 - $184,241

Interior - $46,368 $177,156 $252,277 - $475,801

Plumbing $337,809 $771 $252,984 $9,631 - $601,195


Technology - $53,595 $561,452 - - $615,048

Fire & Life Safety $127,799 $73,588 $2,617 - - $204,004

Site $1,180 $91,328 $230,407 $86,383 - $409,299

Other $309,592 - $279,998 - $145,540 $735,129

Mechanical - $3,656,276 $245,364 - - $3,901,639

Exterior - $1,716 $3,157 - - $4,874

Structural - $16,429 $76,531 $296 - $93,256

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $776,380 $3,942,191 $2,175,356 $462,863 $145,540 $7,502,330








Page 67

EXHIBIT "B"



117

Gullett ES

117 Gullett Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)









Gross Area 39,827 11,525 51,352

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 30


Site Data

School Data

Mechanical 1 1972 179 11.7%

Building A 1 1956 39,648 35.0%


Building Data

29.2%


6310 Treadwell Blvd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $61,370 $687,901 $35,407 - $784,678

Specialties - - $107,868 $120,820 - $228,688

Interior - $42,710 $102,541 $45,619 - $190,871

Plumbing - - $795,120 $36,511 - $831,631

Conveyances - $148,924 - - - $148,924

Technology - $46,009 $370,822 - - $416,831

Fire & Life Safety $88,849 $66,871 - - - $155,719

Site - $10,933 $96,959 $40,134 - $148,025

Other $207,430 - $86,329 - $5,578,522 $5,872,281

Mechanical - $93,054 $1,012,442 - - $1,105,495

Exterior - $917 $51,820 - - $52,737


Roofing - $7,113 $92,238 - - $99,351

Total $296,279 $477,899 $3,404,040 $278,491 $5,578,522 $10,035,231








Page 68

EXHIBIT "B"



118

Harris ES

118 Harris Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 56,066 15,360 71,426

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 33


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1998 14,112 11.3%

Building A 1 1955 41,954 32.2%


Building Data

21.5%


1711 Wheless Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $5,580 $511,741 $44,635 - $561,955

Specialties - - $169,909 $93,228 - $263,136

Interior - - $110,532 $8,601 - $119,133

Plumbing - - $562,894 $29,950 - $592,844


Technology - $47,049 $509,762 - - $556,811

Fire & Life Safety $97,111 $80,372 - - - $177,483

Site - - - $174,752 - $174,752

Other $55,187 - $120,231 - $26,321 $201,740

Mechanical - $93,054 $1,258,887 - - $1,351,940

Exterior - $2,099 $333,669 - - $335,768

Structural - $2,401 - - - $2,401

Roofing $16,363 $232,231 $16,363 - - $264,958

Total $168,662 $462,786 $3,593,988 $351,166 $26,321 $4,602,922








Page 69

EXHIBIT "B"



163

Hart ES

163 Hart Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 81,042 13,824 94,866

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 62


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 2010 11,175 4.0%

Building A 1 1998 69,867 12.6%


Building Data

10.3%


8301 Furness Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $126,867 $541,461 $50,734 - $719,063

Specialties - - $125,968 $188,811 - $314,779

Interior $16,366 $27,849 $54,049 $41,169 - $139,433

Plumbing - - $53,823 $20,398 - $74,221

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $67,824 $659,673 - - $727,497

Fire & Life Safety $143,408 $84,854 - - - $228,262

Site $85,478 - $37,799 $29,425 - $152,702

Other $191,807 - $230,451 - $150,402 $572,660

Mechanical - $60,697 $1,143 - - $61,840

Exterior $2,221 $388 $202 - - $2,811

Structural $824 $3,296 $1,169 - - $5,289

Roofing - $7,887 - - - $7,887

Total $440,103 $429,303 $1,705,738 $330,538 $150,402 $3,056,083








Page 70

EXHIBIT "B"



119

Highland Park ES

119 Highland Park Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)









Gross Area 58,550 9,216 67,766

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 60


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1952 58,550 34.0%


Building Data

31.1%


4900 Fairview Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $259,407 $334,090 $36,116 - $629,613

Specialties - - $148,392 $82,273 - $230,665

Interior - $42,710 $127,305 $59,113 - $229,128

Plumbing - - $1,037,576 $3,209 - $1,040,785


Technology - $50,681 $518,880 - - $569,560

Fire & Life Safety $106,474 $66,857 - - - $173,331

Site - - $230,132 $40,134 - $270,265

Other $102,408 - $145,599 - $2,357,371 $2,605,378

Mechanical $169,708 $108,099 $2,038,859 - - $2,316,666

Exterior - - $25,788 - - $25,788


Roofing - $21,733 $511,227 - - $532,959

Total $378,590 $549,487 $5,117,848 $220,844 $2,357,371 $8,624,139








Page 71

EXHIBIT "B"



155

Hill ES

155 Hill Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 69,626 9,216 78,842

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 74


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1990 7,616 17.3%

Building A 1 1970 62,010 32.1%


Building Data

26.8%


8601 Tallwood Drive Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $336,308 $69,270 - $405,578

Specialties - - $53,658 $75,750 - $129,408

Interior - $106,775 $102,128 $47,029 - $255,933

Plumbing $86,955 - $719,307 $10,698 - $816,960


Technology - $53,374 $544,165 - - $597,539

Fire & Life Safety $122,357 $83,228 - - - $205,584

Site - - $8,269 $40,134 - $48,403

Other $159,986 - $195,096 - $2,849,188 $3,204,270

Mechanical - $519,366 $811,683 $152,292 - $1,483,341

Exterior - - $292 - - $292


Roofing - - $1,982,976 - - $1,982,976

Total $369,298 $762,743 $4,753,883 $395,173 $2,849,188 $9,130,285








Page 72

EXHIBIT "B"



162

Houston ES

162 Houston Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 81,360 15,360 96,720

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 93


Site Data

School Data

Building D 1 2006 11,380 10.8%

Building C 1 1991 5,303 25.9%

Building B 1 1991 8,863 32.5%

Building A 1 1976 55,814 54.5%


Building Data

36.5%


5409 Ponciana Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $301,828 $224,073 $61,942 - $587,843

Specialties - - $205,773 $90,990 - $296,763

Interior - $54,696 $540,337 $62,669 - $657,703

Plumbing - - $680,338 $49,351 - $729,689

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $63,918 $692,577 - - $756,494

Fire & Life Safety $147,480 $80,500 - - - $227,980

Site - $5,847 $9,453 $40,134 - $55,433

Other $163,516 - $390,742 - $513,050 $1,067,308

Mechanical $36,988 $4,449,934 $1,127,316 - - $5,614,238

Exterior - - $3,658 $8,855 - $12,514

Structural - - $8,788 - - $8,788

Roofing - - $899,896 - - $899,896

Total $347,984 $5,056,005 $4,782,952 $313,940 $513,050 $11,013,932








Page 73

EXHIBIT "B"



178

Jordan ES

178 Jordan Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 74,460 12,288 86,748

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 114


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 2008 12,205 4.8%

Building A 1 1992 62,255 27.2%


Building Data

22.0%


6711 Johnny Morris Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $156,212 $406,010 $49,071 - $611,292

Specialties - - $144,437 $130,980 - $275,417

Interior - $21,355 $249,307 $55,637 - $326,299

Plumbing - $79,525 $161,718 $30,096 - $271,339

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $54,550 $646,026 - - $700,576

Fire & Life Safety $118,309 $76,247 - - - $194,556

Site - $5,980 $153,950 $40,134 - $200,064

Other $209,863 - $437,570 - $366,415 $1,013,847

Mechanical $16,073 $33,156 $2,260,379 - - $2,309,608

Exterior - - $32,022 - - $32,022

Structural - - $6,370 - - $6,370

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $344,244 $526,308 $4,497,788 $305,917 $366,415 $6,040,673








Page 74

EXHIBIT "B"



120

Joslin ES

120 Joslin Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 44,826 7,680 52,506

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 56


Site Data

School Data

Building C 1 1986 3,250 5.0%

Building B 1 1957 10,642 41.4%

Building A 1 1954 30,934 55.6%


Building Data

40.6%


4500 Manchaca Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $47,787 $376,979 $5,227 - $429,993

Specialties - - $94,829 $84,871 - $179,700

Interior - - $41,905 $212,692 - $254,597

Plumbing $261,201 - $467,302 $14,976 - $743,479

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $47,435 $358,949 - - $406,384

Fire & Life Safety $88,812 $59,839 $2,617 - - $151,268

Site - $165,935 $4,802 - - $170,737

Other $15,415 - $142,381 - $1,761,730 $1,919,525

Mechanical - $627,110 $884,215 $171,550 - $1,682,876

Exterior - - $1,232,954 - - $1,232,954

Structural - $4,719 $1,537 - - $6,256

Roofing - $606,704 $219,611 - - $826,316

Total $365,427 $1,658,814 $3,828,081 $489,316 $1,761,730 $8,103,367








Page 75

EXHIBIT "B"



180

Kiker ES

180 Kiker Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)









Gross Area 76,332 15,360 91,692

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 90


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 2007 12,783 4.5%

Building A 1 1992 63,549 21.1%


Building Data

16.4%


5913 La Crosse Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $9,906 $29,467 - $39,374

Specialties - - $215,347 $61,320 - $276,667

Interior - $128,130 $344,258 $41,886 - $514,274

Plumbing - - $216,461 $11,770 - $228,231


Technology - $54,681 $646,497 - - $701,179

Fire & Life Safety $126,090 $78,994 - - - $205,083

Site - - $10,547 $87,037 - $97,584

Other $276,715 - $577,848 - $270,058 $1,124,621

Mechanical - - $1,460,014 - - $1,460,014

Exterior $62,649 - $590 - - $63,239

Structural - $3,302 - - - $3,302

Roofing - $20,585 - - - $20,585

Total $465,453 $285,692 $3,481,469 $231,480 $270,058 $4,734,153








Page 76

EXHIBIT "B"



172

Kocurek ES

172 Kocurek Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 78,528 1,536 80,064

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 70


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1998 10,499 8.3%

Building A 1 1986 68,029 28.6%


Building Data

25.5%


9800 Curlew Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $160,129 $85,511 $20,237 - $265,877

Specialties - - $175,608 $130,463 - $306,071

Interior - - $121,380 $45,109 - $166,489

Plumbing - - $170,382 $36,585 - $206,967

Conveyances - $148,924 - - - $148,924

Technology - $67,872 $659,846 - - $727,718

Fire & Life Safety $112,894 $69,086 - - - $181,980

Site - $20,597 $118,823 $73,933 - $213,354

Other $163,863 - $320,146 - $84,409 $568,417

Mechanical - $264,419 $3,033,863 - - $3,298,282

Exterior - $258 $21,688 $7,965 - $29,911

Structural - - $3,472 $23,558 - $27,030

Roofing - $7,927 - - - $7,927

Total $276,757 $739,213 $4,710,718 $337,850 $84,409 $6,148,946








Page 77

EXHIBIT "B"



168

Langford ES

168 Langford Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 78,250 16,896 95,146

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 83


Site Data

School Data

Building C 1 2010 11,831 3.8%

Building B 1 1996 8,753 16.9%

Building A 1 1980 57,666 51.7%


Building Data

33.6%


2206 Blue Meadow Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $274,183 $345,120 $52,952 - $672,255

Specialties - - $158,946 $120,358 - $279,303

Interior - $24,894 $437,101 $47,124 - $509,120

Plumbing $220,334 - $466,878 $30,024 - $717,236

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $55,232 $651,423 - - $706,655

Fire & Life Safety $148,475 $81,228 - - - $229,703

Site - $45,535 $75,331 $42,669 - $163,535

Other $151,320 - $239,586 - $600,073 $990,979

Mechanical $23,055 $5,212,923 $470,507 - - $5,706,485

Exterior - $79,485 $202 - - $79,688

Structural - - $2,170 - - $2,170

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $543,183 $5,823,122 $2,847,265 $293,128 $600,073 $10,106,772








Page 78

EXHIBIT "B"



121

Lee ES

121 Lee Elementary School Grades Served K-6 (ES)









Gross Area 46,265 768 47,033

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 35


Site Data

School Data

Building D 1 1939 1,310 24.2%

Library 1 1998 5,679 8.4%

Mechanical 1 1939 460 13.7%

Building A 1 1939 38,816 44.8%


Building Data

41.1%


3308 Hampton Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $145,055 $437,498 $24,197 - $606,750

Specialties - $227,364 $67,925 $101,699 - $396,988

Interior - $3,267 $289,684 $48,675 - $341,626

Plumbing - $38,607 $988,639 $25,675 - $1,052,921


Technology - $47,901 $407,694 - - $455,595

Fire & Life Safety $73,630 $55,635 - - - $129,265

Site - $6,267 $78,354 - - $84,621

Other $353,154 - $292,571 - $36,675 $682,400

Mechanical - $792,855 $977,327 - - $1,770,182

Exterior - $137,099 $17,506 - - $154,605

Structural - $32,808 - - - $32,808

Roofing - $78,378 $7,013 - - $85,391

Total $426,784 $1,565,236 $3,564,212 $200,247 $36,675 $5,793,153








Page 79

EXHIBIT "B"



160

Linder ES

160 Linder Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 69,250 16,896 86,146

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 86


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1972 69,250 23.7%


Building Data

19.9%


2800 Metcalfe Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $87,923 $75,235 $27,921 - $191,079

Specialties - - $245,387 $141,453 - $386,840

Interior - $85,420 $188,004 $156,894 - $430,318

Plumbing - - $282,747 $7,489 - $290,237


Technology - $53,083 $517,073 - - $570,155

Fire & Life Safety $138,680 $77,410 - - - $216,090

Site - - $194,636 $40,134 - $234,770

Other $32,036 - $142,186 - $5,824,800 $5,999,023

Mechanical - $1,183,106 $1,370,191 - - $2,553,297

Exterior - - $397 - - $397

Structural - - $48,399 - - $48,399

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $170,717 $1,486,942 $3,064,256 $373,892 $5,824,800 $10,920,607








Page 80

EXHIBIT "B"



122

Maplewood ES

122 Maplewood Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)









Gross Area 45,390 9,216 54,606

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 42


Site Data

School Data

Storage 1 1952 572 6.0%

Building A 1 1951 44,818 41.9%


Building Data

37.4%


3808 Maplewood Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $145,055 $285,463 $9,109 - $439,626

Specialties - - $137,772 $67,809 - $205,581

Interior - $1,159 $296,359 $36,200 - $333,719

Plumbing $1,432,387 - $355,682 $6,422 - $1,794,492


Technology - $43,627 $285,586 - - $329,213

Fire & Life Safety $76,274 $61,452 - - - $137,727

Site - $8,593 $528,568 - - $537,161

Other $121,573 - $203,563 - $2,005,569 $2,330,705

Mechanical - - $1,761,164 - - $1,761,164

Exterior - - $98,285 - - $98,285

Structural - - $2,844 - - $2,844

Roofing - $107,641 - - - $107,641

Total $1,630,235 $367,527 $3,955,287 $119,540 $2,005,569 $8,078,158








Page 81

EXHIBIT "B"



123

Mathews ES

123 Mathews Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)









Gross Area 42,112 4,606 46,718

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 0


Site Data

School Data

Building D 1 1996 100 3.6%

Building C 1 1965 48

Building B 1 1948 391

Building A 1 1916 41,573 34.8%


Building Data

31.2%


906 West Lynn St. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $199,892 $141,617 $25,227 - $366,737

Specialties - - $122,219 $91,283 - $213,502

Interior - $109,029 $95,427 $34,351 - $238,808

Plumbing - $4,991 $946,615 $6,420 - $958,026


Technology - $52,122 $337,778 - - $389,900

Fire & Life Safety $55,849 $54,246 - - - $110,095

Site - - $69,246 - - $69,246

Other $41,079 - $125,550 - $2,282,922 $2,449,551

Mechanical $6,971 $979,213 $687,427 $15,202 - $1,688,813

Exterior - - $12,088 $113,496 - $125,584

Structural - $8,430 - - - $8,430

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $103,898 $1,407,923 $2,537,969 $285,980 $2,282,922 $6,618,692








Page 82

EXHIBIT "B"



165

McBee ES

165 McBee Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)









Gross Area 69,717 9,216 78,933

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 90


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1999 69,717 7.8%


Building Data

7.9%


1001 West Braker Lane Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $81,656 $30,695 $45,032 - $157,383

Specialties - - $168,777 $62,784 - $231,561

Interior - $89,744 $84,538 $124,936 - $299,218

Plumbing - - $37,720 $9,631 - $47,351


Technology - $49,166 $577,456 - - $626,622

Fire & Life Safety $117,796 $75,825 - - - $193,621

Site $58,760 $1,308 $1,112 - - $61,180

Other $60,968 - $99,797 - $57,384 $218,148

Mechanical - $21,645 $29,969 - - $51,614

Exterior - - $1,716 - - $1,716


Roofing - - $4,268 - - $4,268

Total $237,524 $319,343 $1,036,048 $242,383 $57,384 $1,892,682








Page 83

EXHIBIT "B"



147

Menchaca ES

147 Menchaca Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 59,978 10,752 70,730

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 83


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1975 59,978 43.5%


Building Data

36.9%


12120 Manchaca Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $88,453 $40,491 $50,379 - $179,322

Specialties - - $102,211 $90,546 - $192,757

Interior - $128,130 $257,782 $462,745 - $848,657

Plumbing - - $560,898 $16,048 - $576,946


Technology - $125,045 $455,240 - - $580,285

Fire & Life Safety $102,512 $41,970 - - - $144,482

Site - $42,176 $111,016 $73,933 - $227,126

Other $134,935 - $224,219 - $82,611 $441,764

Mechanical - $3,855,561 $730,614 - - $4,586,174

Exterior - - $4,712 - - $4,712

Structural - - $877 - - $877

Roofing - $32,373 $28,907 - - $61,280

Total $237,446 $4,313,709 $2,516,965 $693,652 $82,611 $7,844,383








Page 84

EXHIBIT "B"



124

Metz ES

124 Metz Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 61,905 3,072 64,977

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 45


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1993 61,905 32.3%


Building Data

30.6%


84 Robert T. Martinez, Jr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $211,049 $23,656 $21,704 - $256,409

Specialties - - $144,856 $154,598 - $299,454

Interior - $42,710 $68,165 $52,813 - $163,688

Plumbing - - $108,586 $8,559 - $117,145


Technology - $52,126 $513,620 - - $565,747

Fire & Life Safety $84,706 $64,395 $2,617 - - $151,718

Site $1,481 $654 $14,812 $2,225 - $19,172

Other $159,506 - $475,748 - $213,073 $848,327

Mechanical - $138,412 $1,871,641 - - $2,010,054

Exterior - $2,221 - - - $2,221


Roofing - $1,686,580 $373 - - $1,686,953

Total $245,693 $2,198,147 $3,224,075 $239,898 $213,073 $6,120,886








Page 85

EXHIBIT "B"



181

Mills ES

181 Mills Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 81,368 12,288 93,656

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 104


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1998 81,368 13.7%


Building Data

12.7%


6201 Davis Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $454 $129,501 $20,194 $26,219 - $176,368

Specialties - - $136,728 $216,156 - $352,884

Interior - $85,420 $238,434 $12,904 - $336,758

Plumbing - - $99,786 $6,422 - $106,208

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $65,331 $691,892 - - $757,223

Fire & Life Safety $140,775 $78,130 - - - $218,905

Site - - $4,271 $140,421 - $144,692

Other $113,354 - $300,224 - $163,005 $576,583

Mechanical - $30,001 $735,357 $202,621 - $967,978

Exterior - - $12,051 - - $12,051

Structural - - $2,701 - - $2,701

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $254,583 $438,024 $2,241,637 $604,743 $163,005 $3,701,993








Page 86

EXHIBIT "B"



150

Norman ES

150 Norman Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 58,519 1,536 60,055

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 74


Site Data

School Data

Classroom 1 2007 13,827 4.7%

Building A 1 1970 44,692 41.8%


Building Data

32.6%


4001 Tannehill Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $209,477 $378,944 $31,881 - $620,302

Specialties - - $47,268 $51,613 - $98,881

Interior - - $499,495 $43,010 - $542,505

Plumbing $240,330 - $339,444 $8,562 - $588,335


Technology - $46,535 $386,706 - - $433,241

Fire & Life Safety $87,986 $60,327 - - - $148,313

Site - - $87,439 $114,067 - $201,506

Other $163,681 - $125,797 - $1,961,658 $2,251,136

Mechanical - $1,300,661 $1,169,687 - - $2,470,348

Exterior - - - - - $0

Structural - $1,873 - - - $1,873

Roofing - - $453,578 - - $453,578

Total $491,997 $1,618,873 $3,488,359 $249,133 $1,961,658 $7,810,019








Page 87

EXHIBIT "B"



125

Oak Springs ES

125 Oak Springs Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 47,102 6,144 53,246

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 47


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1984 3,971 15.9%

Building A 1 1958 43,131 28.1%


Building Data

26.0%


3601 Webberville Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $55,790 $361,078 $36,872 - $453,741

Specialties - - $77,847 $88,134 - $165,980

Interior - $85,420 $163,853 $75,624 - $324,898

Plumbing - $248,158 $128,899 $18,257 - $395,314

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $29,465 $311,196 - - $340,661

Fire & Life Safety $86,125 $59,691 - - - $145,816

Site - - $65,735 - - $65,735

Other $220,372 - $142,261 - $30,328 $392,960

Mechanical $129,699 $1,004,248 $497,533 - - $1,631,481

Exterior - - $160,769 - - $160,769


Roofing - $12,365 $4,355 - - $16,719

Total $436,196 $1,544,778 $1,913,526 $218,887 $30,328 $4,143,715








Page 88

EXHIBIT "B"



156

Odom ES

156 Odom Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 61,009 13,824 74,833

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 72


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1970 61,009 21.8%


Building Data

19.2%


1010 Turtle Creek Blvd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $214,246 $326,371 $23,526 - $564,142

Specialties - - $142,742 $140,859 - $283,601

Interior - $106,775 $158,316 $115,216 - $380,308

Plumbing - - $742,105 $24,603 - $766,707


Technology - $47,014 - - - $47,014

Fire & Life Safety $117,601 $44,656 $2,617 - - $164,874

Site - $47,393 $18,972 - - $66,364

Other $197,192 - $231,175 - $75,095 $503,462

Mechanical - $89,478 $1,387,846 - - $1,477,324

Exterior - - $202 - - $202

Structural - $5,518 - - - $5,518

Roofing - - $41,171 - - $41,171

Total $314,793 $555,080 $3,051,516 $304,204 $75,095 $4,300,687








Page 89

EXHIBIT "B"



148

Oak Hill ES

148 Oak Hill Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 75,784 10,752 86,536

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 97


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1984 16,210 20.7%

Building A 1 1974 59,574 43.2%


Building Data

33.6%


6101 Patton Ranch Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $11,159 $1,261,583 $50,338 - $1,323,079

Specialties - - $176,257 $85,095 - $261,352

Interior - $42,710 $1,072,603 $180,232 - $1,295,545

Plumbing $167,045 - $1,167,768 $27,814 - $1,362,627


Technology - $54,881 $640,716 - - $695,597

Fire & Life Safety $116,414 $75,574 - - - $191,988

Site - $8,459 $125,527 $73,933 - $207,920

Other $294,450 - $261,725 - $46,822 $602,998

Mechanical - $2,369,967 $334,717 - - $2,704,684

Exterior - - $38,383 - - $38,383

Structural - - $3,335 - - $3,335

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $577,910 $2,562,750 $5,082,614 $417,412 $46,822 $8,687,508








Page 90

EXHIBIT "B"



126

Ortega ES

126 Ortega Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 47,302 3,072 50,374

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 36


Site Data

School Data

Administration 1 1968 2,143 4.7%

Building C 1 1959 5,146 62.8%

Building B 1 1966 20,907 33.7%

Building A 1 1959 19,106 51.8%


Building Data

40.0%


1135 Garland Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $73,769 $382,619 $33,545 - $489,933

Specialties - - $111,385 $73,315 - $184,700

Interior - $21,355 $33,243 $49,806 - $104,404

Plumbing $273,510 - $513,427 $19,326 - $806,263

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $44,049 $361,196 - - $405,245

Fire & Life Safety $81,278 $57,173 - - - $138,451

Site - - $40,487 $12,624 - $53,112

Other $150,185 - $144,467 - $55,295 $349,948

Mechanical $49,160 $824,283 $951,354 - - $1,824,796

Exterior - - $1,040 - - $1,040

Structural - - $101,906 - - $101,906

Roofing - $1,515,309 $25,714 - - $1,541,023

Total $554,133 $2,585,580 $2,666,838 $188,616 $55,295 $6,050,462








Page 91

EXHIBIT "B"



189

Overton ES

189 Overton Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 91,163 12,288 103,451

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 175


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 2007 91,163 4.2%


Building Data

4.7%


7201 Colony Loop Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $55,790 $12,722 $11,169 - $79,681

Specialties - - $45,799 $96,956 - $142,756

Interior - $21,355 $95,057 $48,506 - $164,918

Plumbing - - $66,546 $14,979 - $81,525

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $52,063 $572,427 - - $624,490

Fire & Life Safety $129,148 $43,854 - - - $173,002

Site - - $5,287 $114,067 - $119,354

Other - - - - - $0


Exterior - - - - - $0


Roofing - - $14,805 - - $14,805

Total $129,148 $222,703 $812,642 $285,677 $0 $1,450,171








Page 92

EXHIBIT "B"



171

Palm ES

171 Palm Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 79,082 3,072 82,154

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 90


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 2005 10,963 7.4%

Building A 1 1987 68,119 10.9%


Building Data

11.1%


7601 Dixie Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $163,064 $54,695 $45,744 - $263,504

Specialties - - $113,500 $98,369 - $211,869

Interior - $23,156 $115,259 $69,249 - $207,664

Plumbing - - $179,032 $10,701 - $189,732


Technology - $64,029 $618,895 - - $682,925

Fire & Life Safety $117,288 $70,637 $2,617 - - $190,543

Site - $18,391 $37,763 $40,134 - $96,287

Other $209,088 - $423,487 - $156,623 $789,198

Mechanical - $9,454 $161,906 - - $171,359

Exterior $242 - $8,918 $38,694 - $47,854


Roofing - $6,899 - - - $6,899

Total $326,618 $355,630 $1,716,073 $302,890 $156,623 $2,857,834








Page 93

EXHIBIT "B"



143

Patton ES

143 Patton Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 76,687 10,752 87,439

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 109


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1986 76,687 19.6%


Building Data

18.1%


6001 Westcreek Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $480 $95,192 $49,465 $30,576 - $175,713

Specialties - - $128,110 $93,252 - $221,363

Interior $741 $149,485 $75,569 $40,077 - $265,872

Plumbing - - $163,075 $8,562 - $171,637


Technology - $54,860 $623,617 - - $678,477

Fire & Life Safety $131,145 $75,540 - - - $206,685

Site - $13,373 $4,610 - - $17,982

Other $148,665 - $726,882 - $309,114 $1,184,662

Mechanical $272,094 $961,395 $869,063 - - $2,102,552

Exterior - $2,114 $1,121 - - $3,234


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $553,125 $1,351,958 $2,641,513 $172,467 $309,114 $5,028,177








Page 94

EXHIBIT "B"



128

Pease ES

128 Pease Elementary School Grades Served K-6 (ES)

2010-11 Utilization (by population) n/a

2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 293




2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 293



Gross Area 35,624 35,624

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 45


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1998 4,870 17.0%

Building A 1 1876 30,754 82.3%


Building Data

75.8%


1106 Rio Grande Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $60,588 $423,750 $571,433 $1,900 - $1,057,671

Specialties $12,393 - $93,350 $59,933 - $165,676

Interior - - $661,149 $8,135 - $669,284

Plumbing - - $870,769 $20,327 - $891,096


Technology - $72,214 $244,011 - - $316,225

Fire & Life Safety $60,070 $49,702 - $513,796 - $623,569

Site - $172,907 $664,245 $191,141 - $1,028,292

Other $213,415 - $95,838 - $51,831 $361,083

Mechanical $19,972 $1,818,797 $343,436 - - $2,182,205

Exterior - $14,064 $451,081 - - $465,145

Structural - - $35,507 - - $35,507

Roofing - $287,386 - - - $287,386

Total $366,438 $2,838,820 $4,030,819 $795,232 $51,831 $8,083,139








Page 95

EXHIBIT "B"



129

Pecan Springs ES

129 Pecan Springs Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 56,992 9,216 66,208

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 63


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1990 10,783 26.8%

Building A 1 1957 46,209 44.0%


Building Data

37.2%


3100 Rogge Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $150,635 $1,333,300 $38,734 - $1,522,669

Specialties - - $147,312 $78,011 - $225,323

Interior - - $230,050 $99,850 - $329,899

Plumbing - - $698,316 $20,398 - $718,714

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $50,268 $475,845 - - $526,112

Fire & Life Safety $99,554 $63,610 - - - $163,165

Site - - $11,743 $298,033 - $309,776

Other $104,559 - $277,133 - $90,134 $471,826

Mechanical - $19,853 $1,145,461 $23,055 - $1,188,368

Exterior - - $882,228 - - $882,228


Roofing - $20,585 $20,585 $984,274 - $1,025,445

Total $204,113 $354,593 $5,221,971 $1,542,355 $90,134 $7,413,166








Page 96

EXHIBIT "B"



190

Perez ES

190 Perez Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 82,223 15,360 97,583

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 106


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 2006 82,223 10.0%


Building Data

9.0%


7500 S. Pleasant Valley Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $23,827 $58,015 $22,813 - $104,655

Specialties - - $151,024 $107,721 - $258,745

Interior - $42,710 $89,644 $11,718 - $144,072

Plumbing $431,564 - $119,257 $8,557 - $559,377


Technology - $68,359 $587,513 - - $655,872

Fire & Life Safety $132,552 $81,267 - - - $213,819

Site - - $7,999 - - $7,999

Other - - - - - $0

Mechanical $642,083 - $3,280 - - $645,363

Exterior - - $11,450 - - $11,450


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $1,206,199 $216,162 $1,028,182 $150,809 $0 $2,601,352








Page 97

EXHIBIT "B"



164

Pickle ES

164 Pickle Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 120,862 6,144 127,006

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 132


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 2001 120,862 5.3%


Building Data

5.7%


1101 Wheatley Avenue Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $88,466 $10,218 - $98,684

Specialties - - $120,738 $77,413 - $198,152

Interior - $64,065 $92,964 $43,330 - $200,359

Plumbing - - $90,090 $23,607 - $113,697

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $78,233 $637,697 - - $715,930

Fire & Life Safety $178,166 $91,255 - - - $269,421

Site - - $31,650 $193,425 - $225,074

Other $88,926 - $160,756 - $116,853 $366,535


Exterior - - $12,894 - - $12,894

Structural - - $3,616 - - $3,616

Roofing - - $2,429 - - $2,429

Total $267,092 $283,194 $1,241,301 $347,992 $116,853 $2,256,432








Page 98

EXHIBIT "B"



151

Pillow ES

151 Pillow Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 54,247 10,752 64,999

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 53


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1969 54,247 52.3%


Building Data

42.9%


3025 Crosscreek Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $720,598 $51,488 - $772,086

Specialties - - $179,417 $126,230 - $305,647

Interior - $42,710 $293,433 $44,466 - $380,609

Plumbing - - $1,574,606 $55,933 - $1,630,539

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $49,648 $441,067 - - $490,715

Fire & Life Safety $107,100 $66,281 - - - $173,381

Site - $97,541 $62,869 $15,011 - $175,421

Other $116,352 - $178,920 - $2,716,120 $3,011,391

Mechanical - $41,700 $1,825,126 - - $1,866,825

Exterior - - $30,260 - - $30,260


Roofing - - $2,131,311 - - $2,131,311

Total $223,451 $347,521 $7,437,607 $293,128 $2,716,120 $11,017,828








Page 99

EXHIBIT "B"



130

Pleasant Hill ES

130 Pleasant Hill Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 65,729 7,680 73,409

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 71


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1985 65,729 21.5%


Building Data

19.6%


6405 Circle S Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $60,398 $25,744 - $86,142

Specialties - - $149,903 $57,475 - $207,378

Interior - $106,775 $74,494 $11,393 - $192,662

Plumbing - - $96,882 $6,420 - $103,302


Technology - $52,104 $524,022 - - $576,126

Fire & Life Safety $110,106 $68,128 - - - $178,234

Site - $1,550 $82,599 - - $84,149

Other $228,868 - $162,817 - $473,908 $865,593

Mechanical - $193,219 $2,242,412 - - $2,435,632

Exterior - - $14,892 - - $14,892


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $338,974 $421,776 $3,408,419 $101,031 $473,908 $4,744,109








Page 100

EXHIBIT "B"



131

Lucy Read Pre-K

131 Lucy Read Pre-K School Grades Served PK (Pre-K)









Gross Area 64,644 9,216 73,860

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 98


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1961 3,069 6.2%

Building A 1 1961 61,575 11.3%


Building Data

11.0%

Austin, Texas 78757 1961 No

2608 RichCreek Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $156,212 $242,226 $34,575 - $433,012

Specialties - - $26,858 $65,901 - $92,758

Interior - - $118,391 $10,593 - $128,985

Plumbing - - $138,641 $3,211 - $141,852


Technology - $40,408 $395,364 - - $435,772

Fire & Life Safety $119,486 $70,631 $2,617 - - $192,735

Site - - - $40,134 - $40,134

Other $71,846 - $230,214 - $9,470 $311,530

Mechanical - $576,178 $13,501 - - $589,679

Exterior - - $51,949 - - $51,949

Structural - - $1,365 - - $1,365

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $191,332 $843,430 $1,221,125 $154,414 $9,470 $2,419,771








Page 101

EXHIBIT "B"



132

Reilly ES

132 Reilly Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 41,646 6,144 47,790

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 45


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1954 41,646 32.0%


Building Data

28.5%


405 Denson Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $176,548 $85,634 $41,902 - $304,084

Specialties - - $50,064 $67,475 - $117,538

Interior - $32,360 $97,077 $48,191 - $177,628

Plumbing $291,538 - $121,730 $5,350 - $418,619


Technology - $46,630 $306,036 - - $352,667

Fire & Life Safety $66,358 $57,152 - - - $123,510

Site - $4,606 $54,280 $40,134 - $99,019

Other $39,270 - $206,426 - $11,517 $257,213

Mechanical - $309,403 $1,367,980 - - $1,677,383

Exterior - - $369,460 - - $369,460

Structural - $77,800 - - - $77,800

Roofing - $81,281 - - - $81,281

Total $397,166 $785,780 $2,658,687 $203,051 $11,517 $4,056,202








Page 102

EXHIBIT "B"



133

Ridgetop ES

133 Ridgetop Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 35,585 4,608 40,193

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 32


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1939 400 8.6%

Building A 1 1939 35,185 32.0%


Building Data

31.4%


5005 Caswell Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $157,434 $62,616 $3,642 - $223,693

Specialties - - $101,584 $422,259 - $523,843

Interior - $42,710 $29,297 $451,012 - $523,019

Plumbing - - $150,484 $22,463 - $172,948


Technology - $45,420 $154,913 - - $200,332

Fire & Life Safety $71,510 $53,744 - - - $125,254

Site - $267,544 $75,461 - - $343,005

Other $93,975 - $164,484 - $22,541 $281,000

Mechanical - $598,001 $759,217 - - $1,357,218

Exterior - - $21,397 - - $21,397

Structural - - $4,502 - - $4,502

Roofing - - $3,940 - - $3,940

Total $165,485 $1,164,852 $1,527,895 $899,377 $22,541 $3,780,150








Page 103

EXHIBIT "B"



174

Rodriguez ES

174 Rodriguez Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 79,918 16,932 96,850

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 114


Site Data

School Data

Classroom 1 2006 10,004 8.3%

Building A 1 1999 69,914 7.7%


Building Data

8.0%


4400 Franklin Park Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $36,759 $32,319 - $69,078

Specialties - - $163,736 $209,404 - $373,140

Interior - $132,079 $110,219 $11,709 - $254,006

Plumbing - - $86,792 $9,631 - $96,424


Technology - $50,944 $639,948 - - $690,892

Fire & Life Safety $149,657 $81,989 - - - $231,647

Site - $7,621 $141,062 $42,669 - $191,353

Other $80,146 - $236,132 - $64,181 $380,459

Mechanical - $62,720 $21,281 - - $84,001

Exterior - - $534 - - $534

Structural - $238 - - - $238

Roofing - - $985 - - $985

Total $229,804 $335,591 $1,437,448 $305,732 $64,181 $2,372,756








Page 104

EXHIBIT "B"



127

Sanchez ES

127 Sanchez Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 78,131 6,144 84,275

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 70


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1976 78,131 28.7%


Building Data

26.5%


73 San Marcos Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $254,788 $574,116 $54,024 - $882,927

Specialties - - $151,094 $110,084 - $261,178

Interior - - $628,109 $114,615 - $742,724

Plumbing - - $166,317 $21,394 - $187,711


Technology - $60,612 $519,647 - - $580,259

Fire & Life Safety $102,706 $64,720 - - - $167,425

Site $1,177 - $71,710 $40,134 - $113,020

Other $65,580 - $174,732 - $2,934,744 $3,175,056

Mechanical - $3,146,518 $312,872 - - $3,459,390

Exterior - $387 $1,716 - - $2,103


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $169,463 $3,527,025 $2,600,313 $340,250 $2,934,744 $9,571,794








Page 105

EXHIBIT "B"



136

St. Elmo ES

136 St. Elmo Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 48,212 3,072 51,284

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 60


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1960 48,212 40.6%


Building Data

41.2%


600 W. St. Elmo Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $156,212 $277,126 $40,873 - $474,211

Specialties - - $166,565 $71,399 - $237,964

Interior - $21,355 $168,428 $14,646 - $204,429

Plumbing - - $1,362,172 $28,881 - $1,391,053


Technology - $48,230 $344,348 - - $392,579

Fire & Life Safety $79,866 $57,477 - - - $137,343

Site - $797 $48,045 $82,803 - $131,645

Other $436,826 - $244,366 - $1,342,548 $2,023,740

Mechanical - $354,726 $754,316 - - $1,109,042

Exterior - - $1,484,314 - - $1,484,314


Roofing - $42,906 - - - $42,906

Total $516,693 $681,703 $4,849,681 $238,602 $1,342,548 $7,629,227








Page 106

EXHIBIT "B"



139

Sims ES

139 Sims Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 44,337 6,144 50,481

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 66


Site Data

School Data

Building F 1 1956 292 81.0%

Building E 1 1956 7,503 32.4%

Building D 1 1956 4,570 57.8%

Building C 1 1956 2,482 36.3%

Building B 1 1961 17,056 35.3%

Building A 1 1956 12,434 55.6%


Building Data

39.4%


1203 Springdale Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $178,641 $630,997 $31,881 - $841,520

Specialties - - $194,276 $86,504 - $280,780

Interior - $85,420 $210,519 $10,727 - $306,666

Plumbing $650,388 - $840,920 $12,837 - $1,504,145


Technology - $47,124 $339,322 - - $386,446

Fire & Life Safety $83,676 $58,028 - - - $141,704

Site - $31,481 $130,753 $129,820 - $292,054

Other $195,428 - $165,575 - $868,224 $1,229,226

Mechanical - - $1,539,650 - - $1,539,650

Exterior - $327 $28,402 $2,221 - $30,950

Structural - $7,498 - - - $7,498

Roofing - $216,011 $10,801 - - $226,812

Total $929,492 $624,530 $4,091,216 $273,990 $868,224 $6,787,451








Page 107

EXHIBIT "B"



138

Summitt ES

138 Summitt Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 75,902 10,752 86,654

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 107


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1989 9,966 24.2%

Building A 1 1986 65,936 28.9%


Building Data

25.2%


12207 Brigadoon Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $1,224 - $276,089 $27,883 - $305,196

Specialties - - $140,477 $103,664 - $244,141

Interior - $7,415 $302,725 $108,624 - $418,765

Plumbing $67,453 - $160,639 $18,257 - $246,348

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $54,765 $631,730 - - $686,495

Fire & Life Safety $130,660 $75,368 - - - $206,028

Site - - $131,854 - - $131,854

Other $254,903 - $538,644 - $177,876 $971,423

Mechanical $4,837 $224,061 $3,173,464 - - $3,402,362

Exterior - - - - - $0


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $459,077 $411,250 $5,355,622 $258,428 $177,876 $6,662,254








Page 108

EXHIBIT "B"



158

Sunset Valley ES

158 Sunset Valley Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 66,467 3,072 69,539

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 86


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1996 9,169 11.6%

Building A 1 1971 57,298 50.9%


Building Data

42.3%


3000 Jones Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $5,012 $97,298 $389,217 $31,881 - $523,409

Specialties - - $98,494 $106,358 - $204,852

Interior - $42,710 $230,079 $81,622 - $354,411

Plumbing - - $485,597 $16,046 - $501,643


Technology - $52,638 $514,926 - - $567,564

Fire & Life Safety $104,397 $71,096 $2,617 - - $178,109

Site - $23,148 $223,578 - - $246,726

Other $61,362 - $150,333 - $2,385,867 $2,597,562

Mechanical - $2,514,744 $1,388,745 - - $3,903,489

Exterior - - $22,439 - - $22,439


Roofing - - $2,043,970 - - $2,043,970

Total $170,770 $2,801,633 $5,549,996 $235,908 $2,385,867 $11,144,175








Page 109

EXHIBIT "B"



140

Travis Heights ES

140 Travis Heights Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 59,589 4,608 64,197

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 44


Site Data

School Data

Building C 1 1994 14,021 20.4%

Building B 1 1985 4,992 35.5%

Building A 1 1938 40,576 39.7%


Building Data

36.6%


2010 Alameda Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $708 $201,183 $385,584 $14,099 - $601,574

Specialties - - $79,247 $85,654 - $164,901

Interior - $64,065 $158,357 $67,889 - $290,311

Plumbing $206,194 - $591,645 $14,976 - $812,815


Technology - $56,634 $494,206 - - $550,839

Fire & Life Safety $99,299 $63,515 - - - $162,814

Site $223,178 $188,278 $2,109 $1,112 - $414,676

Other $435,073 - $626,691 - $1,545,119 $2,606,883

Mechanical - $1,907,086 $694,812 - - $2,601,898

Exterior - - $2,778 $321,483 - $324,261


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $964,451 $2,480,760 $3,035,427 $505,213 $1,545,119 $8,530,971








Page 110

EXHIBIT "B"



141

Walnut Creek ES

141 Walnut Creek Elementary School Grades Served K-6 (ES)









Gross Area 79,536 16,896 96,432

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 94


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1999 34,499 5.6%

Building A 1 1961 45,037 27.3%


Building Data

15.3%


401 W. Braker Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $1,224 $216,949 $268,133 $18,535 - $504,841

Specialties - - $157,043 $118,152 - $275,195

Interior $610 $3,560 $53,758 $57,599 - $115,526

Plumbing $139,018 - $139,251 $5,350 - $283,619


Technology - $55,279 $601,051 - - $656,330

Fire & Life Safety $149,776 $81,314 - - - $231,090

Site - $4,606 $67,837 - - $72,444

Other $83,310 - $44,022 - $10,090 $137,422

Mechanical - $654,561 $482,290 - - $1,136,851

Exterior $2,925 - $837,033 - - $839,957


Roofing $1,499 $141,304 - - - $142,803

Total $378,361 $1,157,572 $2,650,418 $199,636 $10,090 $4,396,078








Page 111

EXHIBIT "B"



175

Widen ES

175 Widen Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 74,523 15,360 89,883

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 92


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1989 10,857 7.4%

Building A 1 1986 63,666 15.5%


Building Data

12.9%


5605 Nuckols Crossing Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $137,522 $136,454 $11,802 - $285,779

Specialties - - $292,213 $92,380 - $384,593

Interior - $106,775 $133,079 $87,980 - $327,835

Plumbing - $748 $134,172 $8,562 - $143,482


Technology - $55,257 $615,502 - - $670,759

Fire & Life Safety $152,816 $80,016 $2,617 - - $235,450

Site - - $121,427 $4,049 - $125,476

Other $188,366 - $334,723 - $244,825 $767,913

Mechanical $1,766 $136,930 $601,976 - - $740,673

Exterior - $2,640 $13,732 - - $16,372

Structural $1,801 - $1,474 $2,648 - $5,923

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $344,749 $519,889 $2,387,370 $207,421 $244,825 $3,704,253








Page 112

EXHIBIT "B"



166

Williams ES

166 Williams Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 64,846 9,216 74,062

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 107


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1976 64,846 40.0%


Building Data

36.9%


500 Mairo Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $156,212 $812,293 $46,853 - $1,015,358

Specialties $24,162 - $202,571 $162,006 - $388,740

Interior - $106,775 $464,627 $11,930 - $583,332

Plumbing - - $812,938 $60,184 - $873,122

Conveyances - $248,207 - - - $248,207

Technology - $51,800 $522,926 - - $574,726

Fire & Life Safety $114,412 $68,848 - - - $183,260

Site - - $132,390 $129,820 - $262,210

Other $68,453 - $183,741 - $2,107,462 $2,359,655

Mechanical - $3,364,894 $124,994 - - $3,489,887

Exterior - - $37,251 $223,445 - $260,696


Roofing - - $20,585 - - $20,585

Total $207,027 $3,996,735 $3,314,316 $634,239 $2,107,462 $10,259,778








Page 113

EXHIBIT "B"



157

Winn ES

157 Winn Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 62,087 4,608 66,695

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 66


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1990 9,970 21.1%

Building A 1 1970 52,117 21.7%


Building Data

22.5%


3500 Susquehanna Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $139,476 $136,299 $36,239 - $312,013

Specialties - - $182,446 $84,899 - $267,345

Interior - $42,710 $212,677 $189,878 - $445,265

Plumbing - - $709,008 $9,629 - $718,637


Technology - $51,835 $479,005 - - $530,840

Fire & Life Safety $100,345 $63,878 - - - $164,223

Site $1,255 - $107,297 $40,134 - $148,686

Other $347,515 - $281,701 - $6,696,886 $7,326,101

Mechanical - $458,519 $777,108 - - $1,235,627

Exterior - - $10,312 - - $10,312

Structural - $2,248 - - - $2,248

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $449,115 $758,666 $2,895,852 $360,778 $6,696,886 $11,161,297








Page 114

EXHIBIT "B"



152

Wooldridge ES

152 Wooldridge Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)









Gross Area 68,543 19,968 88,511

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 60


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1998 9,738 13.4%

Building A 1 1969 58,805 32.1%


Building Data

23.0%


1412 Norseman Terrace Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $9,816 $606,219 $55,369 - $671,404

Specialties - - $245,253 $66,737 - $311,991

Interior - - $111,004 $148,224 - $259,227

Plumbing $304,637 - $965,135 $10,698 - $1,280,469


Technology - $52,683 $500,564 - - $553,247

Fire & Life Safety $141,507 $85,010 - - - $226,517

Site - $4,606 $31,668 $64,475 - $100,749

Other $234,894 - $282,741 - $3,072 $520,707

Mechanical - $1,627,867 $459,905 - - $2,087,773

Exterior - - $56,049 - - $56,049


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $681,037 $1,779,983 $3,258,538 $345,503 $3,072 $6,068,132








Page 115

EXHIBIT "B"



144

Wooten ES

144 Wooten Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)









Gross Area 53,689 18,432 72,121

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 37


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1955 53,689 63.2%


Building Data

51.2%


1406 Dale Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $1,407,108 $60,569 $11,248 - $1,478,925

Specialties - - $150,539 $132,609 - $283,148

Interior - $206,992 $235,337 $44,338 - $486,667

Plumbing $595,605 $1,211,680 $640,145 $31,163 - $2,478,594

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $48,984 $471,209 - - $520,193

Fire & Life Safety $119,270 $71,393 - - - $190,662

Site - $1,112 $629,572 $322,375 - $953,059

Other $437,749 - $518,995 - $1,429,495 $2,386,239

Mechanical - $37,918 $2,705,775 - - $2,743,693

Exterior $1,537 $5,198 $776,990 - - $783,726


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $1,154,161 $3,089,669 $6,189,133 $541,732 $1,429,495 $12,404,189








Page 116

EXHIBIT "B"



145

Zavala ES

145 Zavala Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)









Gross Area 69,333 69,333

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 12


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1937 69,333 32.5%


Building Data

32.8%


310 Robert Martinez, Jr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $5,100 $89,265 $578,418 $65,592 - $738,375

Specialties - $13,163 $163,406 $91,473 - $268,041

Interior - - $260,945 $236,385 - $497,329

Plumbing $571,041 - $1,984,992 $6,420 - $2,562,453


Technology - $56,381 $504,384 - - $560,765

Fire & Life Safety $100,572 $64,748 $2,617 - - $167,937

Site - $1,196 $285,274 - - $286,470

Other $197,619 - $56,846 - $19,700 $274,164

Mechanical - $184,809 $1,186,825 - - $1,371,633

Exterior - - $38,935 $14,187 - $53,122


Roofing - $798 - - - $798

Total $874,332 $410,359 $5,062,642 $414,056 $19,700 $6,781,088








Page 117

EXHIBIT "B"



146

Zilker ES

146 Zilker Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)









Gross Area 50,941 10,752 61,693

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 54


Site Data

School Data

Vocational 1 1950 597 53.3%

Library 1 1990 5,488 24.8%

Gymnasium 1 1961 2,827 49.5%

Building A 1 1950 42,029 69.2%


Building Data

56.4%


1900 Bluebonnet Lane Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $83,685 $466,878 $23,564 - $574,127

Specialties - - $182,402 $98,504 - $280,906

Interior - $22,794 $233,891 $434,142 - $690,827

Plumbing $445,897 $251,267 $1,401,699 $9,629 - $2,108,492


Technology - $44,347 $360,804 - - $405,151

Fire & Life Safety $98,303 $63,990 $2,617 - - $164,909

Site - - $720,410 $210,344 - $930,754

Other $323,124 - $884,203 - $2,565,129 $3,772,456

Mechanical - $204,753 $2,049,476 - - $2,254,229

Exterior $28,203 - $338,242 - - $366,445


Roofing - $1,307,652 $59,313 - - $1,366,966

Total $895,527 $1,978,488 $6,699,936 $776,182 $2,565,129 $12,915,262








Page 118

EXHIBIT "B"



059

Bailey MS

059 Bailey Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)






2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,048 128



Gross Area 148,143 10,752 158,895

Perm Temp Total

2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,041

Permanent Capacity 1,176


Parking Spaces 138


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1993 148,143 15.1%


Building Data

16.4%


4020 Lost Oasis Hollow Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $242,830 $3,406 - $246,236

Specialties - - $161,190 $142,753 - $303,943

Interior - $149,485 $94,214 $72,955 - $316,654

Plumbing - - $236,111 $24,615 $1,568 $262,294

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $197,531 $972,186 - - $1,169,717

Fire & Life Safety $233,448 $125,051 $14,217 - - $372,716

Site - $16,193 $27,289 $824,676 - $868,157

Other $470,451 - $392,173 - $173,780 $1,036,404

Mechanical $14,691 $1,769,423 $1,889,503 - - $3,673,618

Exterior - - $220,269 $192,392 - $412,661


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $718,590 $2,307,324 $4,249,984 $1,260,797 $175,348 $8,712,044








Page 119

EXHIBIT "B"



054

Bedichek MS

054 Bedichek Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)









Gross Area 130,600 27,018 157,618

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 140


Site Data

School Data

Building C 1 1997 9,909 5.8%

Gymnasium 1 1972 28,847 55.2%

Building A 1 1972 91,844 32.0%


Building Data

30.6%


6800 Bill Hughes Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $554,802 $92,282 - $647,084

Specialties - - $90,013 $238,298 - $328,311

Interior $224 $192,195 $807,140 $331,731 - $1,331,290

Plumbing - - $417,426 $30,027 - $447,452

Conveyances $214,837 $49,641 - - - $264,479

Technology - $97,631 $886,402 - - $984,033

Fire & Life Safety $305,625 $162,630 $10,469 - - $478,724

Site - - $192,275 $824,676 - $1,016,951

Other $330,347 - $96,558 - $13,820,241 $14,247,146

Mechanical $5,200,844 $2,584,586 $1,231,358 - - $9,016,787

Exterior - - $2,951 - - $2,951

Structural - $11,113 - - - $11,113

Roofing - $849,916 - - - $849,916

Total $6,051,876 $3,947,712 $4,289,394 $1,517,014 $13,820,241 $29,626,237








Page 120

EXHIBIT "B"



046

Burnet MS

046 Burnet Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)









Gross Area 137,768 18,432 156,200

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 50


Site Data

School Data

Mechanical 1 1969 1,025 0.4%

Building A 1 1961 136,743 37.5%


Building Data

34.5%


8401 Hathaway Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $284,750 $2,562,829 $72,232 - $2,919,811

Specialties - - $398,072 $287,254 - $685,326

Interior - $219,280 $300,419 $20,695 - $540,393

Plumbing $332,126 $3,631 $256,340 $28,960 - $621,057

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $82,434 $854,942 - - $937,377

Fire & Life Safety $217,661 $119,840 $2,617 - - $340,118

Site - $106,911 - $1,052,251 - $1,159,162

Other $146,741 - $176,985 - $1,228,083 $1,551,810

Mechanical - $6,231,657 $1,586,077 - - $7,817,734

Exterior - $127,204 $7,663 - - $134,868

Structural - $3,472 $868 - - $4,340

Roofing - - $2,095,309 - - $2,095,309

Total $696,528 $7,228,821 $8,242,121 $1,461,392 $1,228,083 $18,856,946








Page 121

EXHIBIT "B"



057

Covington MS

057 Covington Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)









Gross Area 173,636 4,608 178,244

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 122


Site Data

School Data

Vocational 1 1986 18,307 18.9%

Auditorium 1 1986 20,672 20.3%

Building A 1 1986 134,657 18.9%


Building Data

18.7%


3700 Convict Hill Rd Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $297,742 $374,659 $66,064 - $738,464

Specialties - - $218,812 $314,103 - $532,914

Interior - $21,355 $126,060 $187,566 - $334,981

Plumbing - - $366,484 $31,967 - $398,450

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $97,536 $975,699 - - $1,073,235

Fire & Life Safety $247,938 $156,334 $33,669 - - $437,941

Site - $243 $220,213 $79,540 - $299,996

Other $442,312 - $330,814 - $1,960,490 $2,733,617

Mechanical $271,148 $2,997,320 $2,777,473 - - $6,045,940

Exterior - $6,006 $31,080 - - $37,086

Structural - - $1,775 - - $1,775

Roofing - $165,465 $1,050 - - $166,514

Total $961,398 $3,791,641 $5,457,787 $679,240 $1,960,490 $12,850,556








Page 122

EXHIBIT "B"



055

Dobie MS

055 Dobie Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)









Gross Area 134,563 6,144 140,707

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 120


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 2006 10,564 8.3%

Building A 1 1973 123,999 14.0%


Building Data

15.2%


1200 E. Rundberg Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $22,712 $200,845 $696,953 $26,695 - $947,204

Specialties - - $300,442 $286,623 - $587,065

Interior $42,171 $6,076 $648,770 $22,550 - $719,567

Plumbing $86,955 - $532,071 $38,660 - $657,686

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $116,153 $817,034 - - $933,187

Fire & Life Safety $205,797 $104,739 $7,852 - - $318,388

Site - - $229,980 $779,468 - $1,009,448

Other $172,266 - $209,938 - $6,327,599 $6,709,803

Mechanical $274,000 $505,060 $550,219 - - $1,329,279

Exterior $15,417 - - - - $15,417


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $819,317 $1,032,156 $3,993,260 $1,153,996 $6,327,599 $13,326,328








Page 123

EXHIBIT "B"



043

Fulmore MS

043 Fulmore Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)









Gross Area 159,699 7,680 167,379

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 85


Site Data

School Data

Building D 1 2002 13,392 8.0%

Vocational 1 1980 18,500 56.1%

Cafeteria 1 1980 55,143 40.8%

Building A 1 1911 72,664 46.9%


Building Data

40.6%


201 East Mary Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $5,580 $4,806,824 $574,802 - $5,387,205

Specialties - - $150,593 $341,284 - $491,878

Interior - $55,906 $611,384 $484,733 - $1,152,023

Plumbing $563,639 - $1,384,084 $103,215 - $2,050,938

Conveyances - $49,641 $8,858 - - $58,499

Technology - $122,392 $973,199 - - $1,095,590

Fire & Life Safety $237,738 $150,179 $35,577 - - $423,494

Site $3,001 $4,218 $435,203 $16,796 - $459,218

Other $866,429 - $694,429 - $353,775 $1,914,633

Mechanical - $7,512,668 $1,845,434 - - $9,358,102

Exterior - $2,011 $115,027 - - $117,038

Structural - $3,151 $33,724 - - $36,876

Roofing $4,239 - $30,865 - - $35,104

Total $1,675,047 $7,905,746 $11,125,201 $1,520,831 $353,775 $22,580,600








Page 124

EXHIBIT "B"



056

Garcia MS

056 Garcia Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)









Gross Area 160,764 160,764

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 160


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 2008 160,764 4.8%


Building Data

4.7%


7414 Johnny Morris Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $86,118 $4,515 - $90,633

Specialties - - $39,734 $156,485 - $196,219

Interior - - $105,789 $65,660 - $171,449

Plumbing - - $116,926 $30,029 - $146,955

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $108,594 $1,089,676 - - $1,198,270

Fire & Life Safety $341,779 $83,119 $38,970 - - $463,868

Site - - - - - $0

Other - - - - - $0

Mechanical - $133,965 - - - $133,965

Exterior - - - - - $0


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $341,779 $375,320 $1,477,213 $256,690 $0 $2,451,001








Page 125

EXHIBIT "B"



062

Gorzycki MS

062 Gorzycki Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)









Gross Area 175,543 175,543

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 160


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 2009 175,543 4.7%


Building Data

4.6%


7412 West Slaughter Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $127,097 $2,376 - $129,472

Specialties - - $33,711 $300,646 - $334,357

Interior - - $108,064 $73,924 - $181,987

Plumbing - - $157,202 $18,190 - $175,392


Technology - $138,695 $1,099,309 - - $1,238,004

Fire & Life Safety $309,464 $87,857 $5,235 - - $402,556

Site - - - $40,134 - $40,134

Other - - - - - $0

Mechanical - $103,990 $20,852 - - $124,842

Exterior - - - - - $0


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $309,464 $330,542 $1,551,469 $435,269 $0 $2,626,743








Page 126

EXHIBIT "B"



044

Kealing MS

044 Kealing Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)


2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 541 1,027







Gross Area 192,181 192,181

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 160


Site Data

School Data

Building C 1 2007 34,819 3.8%

Gym/Café/Aud 1 1986 55,783 24.8%

Building A 1 1986 101,579 20.4%


Building Data

18.6%


1607 Pennsylvania Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $67,252 $180,541 $313,476 $33,349 - $594,617

Specialties - - $179,106 $449,683 - $628,789

Interior - $30,226 $364,771 $127,864 - $522,860

Plumbing - - $503,134 $28,962 - $532,097

Conveyances $8,858 $49,641 - - - $58,499

Technology - $150,808 $1,362,779 - - $1,513,586

Fire & Life Safety $260,502 $149,268 $44,560 - - $454,330

Site - - $82,009 $322,375 - $404,383

Other $39,330 - $284,944 - $464,321 $788,595

Mechanical - $414,668 $2,119,963 - - $2,534,631

Exterior - - $129,828 - - $129,828


Roofing - $3,999,808 - - - $3,999,808

Total $375,942 $4,974,961 $5,384,570 $962,232 $464,321 $12,162,026








Page 127

EXHIBIT "B"



045

Lamar MS

045 Lamar Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)









Gross Area 121,371 4,608 125,979

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 106


Site Data

School Data

Mechanical 1 2000 2,004 0.1%

Building C 1 2000 5,354 8.3%

Band 1 2000 9,032 6.0%

Building A 1 1955 104,981 20.2%


Building Data

19.3%


6201 Wynona Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $197,826 $307,218 $139,583 $47,865 - $692,493

Specialties - - $121,330 $149,732 - $271,062

Interior - $85,501 $243,886 $24,393 - $353,780

Plumbing $2,903 $557,289 $864,148 $18,193 - $1,442,532


Technology - $116,800 $852,286 - - $969,086

Fire & Life Safety $169,084 $115,092 $17,966 - - $302,142

Site $5,195 - $29,823 $869,155 - $904,172

Other $191,867 - $230,959 - $19,344 $442,170

Mechanical $290,910 $1,247,215 $700,617 - - $2,238,742

Exterior $898 $433,743 - - - $434,641

Structural $9,432 - $39,783 - - $49,215

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $868,115 $2,862,857 $3,240,381 $1,109,337 $19,344 $8,100,034








Page 128

EXHIBIT "B"



051

Martin MS

051 Martin Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)









Gross Area 107,983 10,752 118,735

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 94


Site Data

School Data

Gym/Café/Aud 1 1966 52,693 26.2%

Building A 1 1966 55,290 36.4%


Building Data

28.8%


1601 Haskell Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $694,824 $667,931 $35,746 - $1,398,501

Specialties - - $99,298 $306,386 - $405,683

Interior - $109,213 $899,675 $43,981 - $1,052,869

Plumbing - $60,523 $832,467 $36,516 - $929,506

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $103,356 $719,130 - - $822,486

Fire & Life Safety $182,171 $101,186 $16,480 - - $299,837

Site - $775 $85,474 $86,678 - $172,927

Other $123,167 - $325,108 - $3,297,183 $3,745,458

Mechanical $224,290 $4,838,987 $340,715 - - $5,403,992

Exterior - $435 $50,001 $112,643 - $163,079

Structural - - $1,395 $8,681 - $10,075

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $529,628 $6,008,583 $4,037,673 $630,629 $3,297,183 $14,503,696








Page 129

EXHIBIT "B"



058

Mendez MS

058 Mendez Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)









Gross Area 173,382 13,824 187,206

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 139


Site Data

School Data

Vocational 1 1987 17,552 20.4%

Auditorium 1 1987 20,672 15.0%

Building A 1 1987 135,158 13.4%


Building Data

15.0%


5106 Village Square Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $132,718 $1,017,416 $26,774 - $1,176,907

Specialties - - $153,510 $314,681 - $468,191

Interior - $60,254 $235,743 $17,936 - $313,933

Plumbing - - $154,472 $36,518 - $190,990

Conveyances - $108,141 - - - $108,141

Technology - $125,787 $1,090,662 - - $1,216,449

Fire & Life Safety $271,136 $157,700 $58,777 - - $487,613

Site - $3,144 $30,858 $482,213 - $516,215

Other $396,215 - $406,857 - $1,830,512 $2,633,585

Mechanical $412,860 $3,475,928 $10,551 - - $3,899,338

Exterior - $193 $3,653 $25,747 - $29,594


Roofing - $5,877 - - - $5,877

Total $1,080,210 $4,069,741 $3,162,498 $903,869 $1,830,512 $11,046,831








Page 130

EXHIBIT "B"



052

Murchison MS

052 Murchison Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)









Gross Area 123,348 16,256 139,604

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 124


Site Data

School Data

Greenhouse 1 1979 896 11.5%

Storage 1 1987 367

Building B 1 1998 16,628 6.1%

Building A 1 1967 105,457 25.8%


Building Data

19.9%


3700 North Hills Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $793,680 $63,925 - $857,604

Specialties - - $340,986 $225,844 - $566,830

Interior - $170,840 $149,672 $724,559 - $1,045,070

Plumbing $86,955 - $396,795 $25,685 - $509,434


Technology - $78,856 $882,096 - - $960,952

Fire & Life Safety $214,865 $135,922 $41,521 - - $392,308

Site - - $17,512 - - $17,512

Other $151,066 - $228,101 - $8,153,256 $8,532,423

Mechanical $32,241 $303,841 $3,101,002 - - $3,437,084

Exterior - $5,383 $337 - - $5,720


Roofing - $928,708 - - - $928,708

Total $485,127 $1,623,549 $5,951,701 $1,040,012 $8,153,256 $17,253,644








Page 131

EXHIBIT "B"



047

O. Henry MS

047 O. Henry Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)









Gross Area 124,320 6,144 130,464

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 103


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1953 124,320 12.3%


Building Data

13.3%


2610 West 10th St. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $244,583 $266,248 $86,974 - $597,805

Specialties - - $83,741 $204,056 - $287,797

Interior - $85,420 $158,448 $37,802 - $281,670

Plumbing - - $2,047,419 $34,313 - $2,081,732

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $92,335 $808,610 - - $900,945

Fire & Life Safety $191,584 $127,909 $15,349 - - $334,841

Site - - $532,421 $5,561 - $537,983

Other $95,479 - $93,514 - $3,270,833 $3,459,826

Mechanical - $187,659 $89,395 - - $277,054

Exterior - $725 $49,612 - - $50,337

Structural - - $33,856 - - $33,856

Roofing - - $70,588 - - $70,588

Total $287,063 $788,273 $4,249,201 $368,706 $3,270,833 $8,964,076








Page 132

EXHIBIT "B"



061

Paredes MS

061 Paredes Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)









Gross Area 148,695 6,144 154,839

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 108


Site Data

School Data

Gymnasium 1 2000 34,358 5.4%

Band 1 2000 9,072 9.4%

Cafeteria 1 2000 15,854 4.6%

Building C 1 2000 4,035 29.8%


Building A 1 2000 79,374 10.5%


Building Data

11.0%


10100 S. Mary Moore Searight Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $449,283 $71,212 - $520,495

Specialties - - $93,998 $1,064,189 - $1,158,186

Interior - $30,772 $214,463 $118,134 - $363,369

Plumbing - - $330,677 $42,936 - $373,613

Conveyances - $148,924 - - - $148,924

Technology - $104,752 $1,036,362 - - $1,141,114

Fire & Life Safety $228,900 $150,096 $56,160 - - $435,155

Site - $99,871 $121,562 $208,564 - $429,998

Other $277,115 - $460,476 - $274,674 $1,012,265

Mechanical $133,382 $85,083 $18,278 - - $236,742

Exterior - - $6,745 - - $6,745


Roofing - $36,100 - - - $36,100

Total $639,397 $655,597 $2,788,004 $1,505,034 $274,674 $5,862,705








Page 133

EXHIBIT "B"



048

Pearce MS

048 Pearce Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)









Gross Area 132,596 1,536 134,132

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 82


Site Data

School Data

Auditorium 1 1958 8,637 4.4%

Building A 1 1958 123,959 15.7%


Building Data

15.0%


6401 N. Hampton Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $859,515 $42,854 - $902,369

Specialties - - $154,528 $176,304 - $330,832

Interior - $28,343 $236,543 $120,791 - $385,677

Plumbing - - $1,076,087 $18,193 - $1,094,279

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $122,320 $849,279 - - $971,599

Fire & Life Safety $191,660 $103,728 $17,966 - - $313,354

Site - $144,156 $120,754 $79,542 - $344,451

Other $184,723 - $38,956 - $797,883 $1,021,561

Mechanical $420,778 $582,707 $238,457 - - $1,241,941

Exterior - - $277,949 - - $277,949


Roofing - $438,273 - - - $438,273

Total $797,160 $1,469,168 $3,870,033 $437,683 $797,883 $7,371,927








Page 134

EXHIBIT "B"



028

Ann Richards School

028 Ann Richards School Grades Served 6-9 (MS)









Gross Area 130,240 7,424 137,664

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 90


Site Data

School Data

Building D 1 2010 7,000 4.9%

Band 1 1998 3,471 12.6%

Mechanical 1 1958 1,114 3.4%

Building A 1 1958 118,655 39.9%


Building Data

34.3%


2206 Prather Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $195,266 $493,696 $24,159 - $713,121

Specialties - - $76,149 $233,139 - $309,289

Interior - - $212,810 $181,719 - $394,529

Plumbing $1,459,762 - $1,955,099 $13,914 - $3,428,775


Technology - $148,770 $789,429 - - $938,199

Fire & Life Safety $201,671 $132,686 $11,600 - - $345,957

Site - $2,658 $92,455 $322,375 - $417,487

Other $82,916 - $390,377 - $126,188 $599,481

Mechanical - $1,997,171 $4,758,996 - - $6,756,167

Exterior - - $32,701 - - $32,701

Structural $7,066 $10,864 $6,455 - - $24,385

Roofing - $2,660 $1,640,134 - - $1,642,794

Total $1,751,415 $2,490,074 $10,459,899 $775,306 $126,188 $15,602,883








Page 135

EXHIBIT "B"



060

Small MS

060 Small Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)









Gross Area 160,599 4,608 165,207

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 108


Site Data

School Data

Building A 1 1999 160,599 7.0%


Building Data

6.9%


4801 Monterey Oaks Blvd. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $173,490 $223,754 $31,131 - $428,375

Specialties - - $158,112 $272,576 - $430,688

Interior - $64,065 $142,138 $8,628 - $214,831

Plumbing - $30,214 $102,766 $41,871 - $174,851

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $100,499 $1,022,152 - - $1,122,650

Fire & Life Safety $233,877 $142,267 $8,983 - - $385,126

Site $832 - $136,337 - - $137,169

Other $93,147 - $137,739 - $162,029 $392,915

Mechanical $26,588 $431,732 $42,561 - - $500,882

Exterior - $4,284 $6,119 - - $10,403


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $354,444 $1,045,835 $1,980,661 $354,205 $162,029 $3,897,174








Page 136

EXHIBIT "B"



053

Webb MS

053 Webb Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)









Gross Area 120,987 9,216 130,203

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 93


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 2008 10,854 0.2%

Building A 1 1961 110,133 21.1%


Building Data

19.8%


601 E. St. Johns Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $98,562 $1,006,111 $98,064 - $1,202,736

Specialties - - $134,682 $213,638 - $348,320

Interior - $106,775 $134,051 $258,925 - $499,751

Plumbing - - $515,120 $18,195 - $533,315


Technology - $59,544 $656,548 - - $716,092

Fire & Life Safety $180,725 $108,863 $22,069 - - $311,657

Site - $31,426 $67,218 $824,676 - $923,320

Other $239,808 - $168,085 - $733,661 $1,141,554

Mechanical - $2,073,414 $334,031 - - $2,407,445

Exterior - - $42,118 - - $42,118


Roofing - $1,036,854 - - - $1,036,854

Total $420,533 $3,515,438 $3,080,033 $1,413,498 $733,661 $9,163,164








Page 137

EXHIBIT "B"



017

Akins HS

017 Akins High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)









Gross Area 324,950 31,616 356,566

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 659


Site Data

School Data

Classroom 1 2008 17,266 5.5%

Greenhouse 1 2004 3,079 3.3%

Cafeteria 1 2000 21,733 1.3%

Gymnasium 1 2000 48,566 2.1%

Theatre 1 2000 39,881 4.3%

Building A 1 2000 194,425 8.3%


Building Data

6.6%


10701 South 1st St. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $7,162 $175,205 $65,510 - $247,877

Specialties - - $243,956 $598,275 - $842,231

Interior - $42,710 $551,282 $48,002 - $641,994

Plumbing - - $267,011 $85,304 - $352,315

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $210,114 $1,966,674 - - $2,176,788

Fire & Life Safety $671,824 $277,782 $8,983 - - $958,589

Site $8,006 $1,530 - $655,397 - $664,932

Other $274,429 - $543,674 - $134,171 $952,274

Mechanical - $556,614 $59,616 - - $616,230

Exterior - - $129,395 - - $129,395


Roofing - $13,363 $20,715 - - $34,078

Total $954,259 $1,208,558 $3,966,511 $1,452,488 $134,171 $7,715,986








Page 138

EXHIBIT "B"



009

Anderson HS

009 Anderson High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)


2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,962 411







Gross Area 309,329 1,536 310,865

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 760


Site Data

School Data

Library 1 2000 17,078 2.8%

Gym/Café/Aud 1 1973 121,018 36.1%

Building A 1 1973 171,233 24.2%


Building Data

27.6%


8403 Mesa Drive Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $717,293 $934,027 $57,350 - $1,708,671

Specialties - - $391,446 $576,918 - $968,364

Interior - $22,177 $3,519,578 $944,064 - $4,485,819

Plumbing $187,292 $41,436 $567,702 $125,657 - $922,088

Conveyances - $358,670 - - - $358,670

Technology - $312,614 $2,218,774 - - $2,531,388

Fire & Life Safety $470,913 $363,018 $29,211 - - $863,142

Site - - $134,285 $51,280 - $185,565

Other $223,608 - $501,829 - $8,421,936 $9,147,373

Mechanical - $5,357,640 $771,481 $204,396 - $6,333,517

Exterior $2,067 - $204,242 - - $206,309

Structural - - $62,479 - - $62,479

Roofing - $96,476 - - - $96,476

Total $883,879 $7,269,324 $9,335,056 $1,959,665 $8,421,936 $27,869,861








Page 139

EXHIBIT "B"



002

Austin HS

002 Austin High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)









Gross Area 307,089 7,680 314,769

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 544


Site Data

School Data

Theatre 1 2000 23,571 3.2%

Gym/Café/Aud 1 1975 283,518 33.1%


Building Data

31.1%


1715 W. Cesar Chavez Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $20,527 $4,561,332 $39,527 - $4,621,386

Specialties - - $209,276 $615,356 - $824,632

Interior - $21,355 $4,141,426 $2,540,593 - $6,703,375

Plumbing - - $2,691,810 $35,372 - $2,727,183

Conveyances - $337,711 - - - $337,711

Technology - $290,897 $1,862,990 - - $2,153,887

Fire & Life Safety $444,850 $274,031 $32,183 - - $751,064

Site - - $557,354 $811,547 - $1,368,901

Other $383,831 - $458,131 - $8,187,414 $9,029,376

Mechanical $972,255 $6,008,873 $2,517,319 - - $9,498,447

Exterior $20,833 $539 $36,126 $112,707 - $170,205

Structural - $35,970 - - - $35,970

Roofing - $1,609,284 - - - $1,609,284

Total $1,821,769 $8,599,187 $17,067,949 $4,155,102 $8,187,414 $39,831,421








Page 140

EXHIBIT "B"



013

Bowie HS

013 Bowie High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)









Gross Area 417,702 19,968 437,670

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 678


Site Data

School Data

Gym/Café/Aud 1 1988 107,282 19.2%

Mechanical 1 1988 5,462 49.0%

Vocational 1 1988 27,588 51.6%

Greenhouse 1 1988 913 11.4%

Greenhouse 1 1988 634 16.2%

Building B 1 1988 261,135 24.8%



Building Data

31.4%


4103 Slaughter Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $467,936 $613,437 $21,465 - $1,102,839

Specialties - $4,947 $551,033 $11,602,340 - $12,158,320

Interior - $35,042 $2,759,482 $3,235,155 - $6,029,679

Plumbing - - $1,589,269 $160,177 - $1,749,446

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $329,391 $2,529,387 - - $2,858,778

Fire & Life Safety $607,200 $366,573 $101,563 - - $1,075,335

Site - $36,278 $13,022 - - $49,300

Other $535,544 - $1,558,342 - $884,595 $2,978,481

Mechanical - $12,273,635 $4,660,249 - - $16,933,885

Exterior - $1,999 $89,863 $101,843 - $193,705

Structural - - $52,083 $25,949 - $78,032

Roofing - $4,399 - $483 - $4,882

Total $1,142,743 $13,619,484 $14,517,730 $15,147,412 $884,595 $45,311,964








Page 141

EXHIBIT "B"



008

Crockett HS

008 Crockett High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)









Gross Area 335,087 10,752 345,839

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 666


Site Data

School Data

Theatre 1 1988 12,929 50.5%

Gym/Café/Aud 1 1969 322,158 30.3%


Building Data

31.2%


5601 Manchaca Road Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $139,476 $4,326,369 $112,680 - $4,578,524

Specialties - - $250,923 $1,031,862 - $1,282,785

Interior - $105,620 $2,134,141 $90,119 - $2,329,881

Plumbing $86,955 $2,145,931 $3,057,073 $146,206 - $5,436,165

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $231,149 $1,881,006 - - $2,112,155

Fire & Life Safety $480,657 $324,155 $61,394 - - $866,207

Site $4,218 $9,966 $999,378 $199,650 - $1,213,212

Other $1,057,058 - $386,480 - $186,183 $1,629,721

Mechanical $193,260 $7,594,793 $5,595,876 - - $13,383,929

Exterior - $3,931 $460,633 - - $464,564

Structural - $5,402 - - - $5,402

Roofing - - $240,940 $1,431,074 - $1,672,014

Total $1,822,148 $10,610,065 $19,394,213 $3,011,592 $186,183 $35,024,201








Page 142

EXHIBIT "B"



019

Eastside Memorial High Schools (EMHSJC)

019 Eastside Memorial High Schools (EMHSJC) Grades Served 9-12 (HS)









Gross Area 267,140 2,976 270,116

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 228


Site Data

School Data

Green Tech 1 1998 25,816 1.6%

Mechanical 1 1998 248

Classroom 1 1986 24,940 7.6%

Theatre 1 1986 10,851 35.4%

Gym/Café/Aud 1 1960 205,285 32.6%


Building Data

27.0%

Austin, Te 78721 0 NR No

1012 Arthur Stiles Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $4,487,048 $332,662 $162,664 - $4,982,374

Specialties $271 - $864,657 $374,364 - $1,239,291

Interior $431 $176,082 $316,120 $31,050 - $523,683

Plumbing $2,724,650 $2,483,754 $119,797 $76,745 - $5,404,947

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $122,906 $1,313,795 - - $1,436,701

Fire & Life Safety $343,950 $148,014 $38,970 - - $530,934

Site $608 - $291,746 - - $292,354

Other $386,864 - $277,245 - $213,544 $877,654

Mechanical $54,167 $1,080,074 $37,306 - - $1,171,547

Exterior - $3,456,001 $301,327 $4,120 - $3,761,448

Structural - - - $1,946 - $1,946

Roofing - $70,262 $3,372,487 - - $3,442,749

Total $3,510,942 $12,123,425 $7,266,111 $650,888 $213,544 $23,764,910








Page 143

EXHIBIT "B"



015

Garza Independence HS

015 Garza Independence High School Grades Served 11-12 (HS)









Gross Area 44,754 9,480 54,234

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 36


Site Data

School Data

Building E 1 1939 248

Building D 1 1939 48

Mechanical 1 1939 493 183.5%

Building B 1 1965 11,435 11.5%

Building A 1 1939 32,530 21.1%


Building Data

21.5%


1600 Chicon Street Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $223,161 $674,892 $67,527 - $965,579

Specialties - - $31,488 $235,513 - $267,002

Interior - $229,385 $160,297 $146,780 - $536,462

Plumbing - - $253,112 $26,530 - $279,642


Technology - $60,658 $310,505 - - $371,163

Fire & Life Safety $144,862 $66,414 $10,469 - - $221,745

Site - $33,221 $33,788 $40,134 - $107,143

Other $383,919 - $17,142 - $198,632 $599,694

Mechanical - $312,874 $46,307 - - $359,181

Exterior - - $252,129 - - $252,129

Structural - - $942 - - $942

Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $528,781 $925,712 $1,791,072 $516,483 $198,632 $3,960,682








Page 144

EXHIBIT "B"



014

Johnson (LBJ) HS

014 Johnson (LBJ) High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)









Gross Area 291,406 13,824 305,230

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 598


Site Data

School Data

Theatre 1 2006 16,140 9.9%

Gym/Café/Aud 1 1974 275,266 14.9%


Building Data

14.4%


7309 Lazy Creek Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $2,383,711 $103,648 - $2,487,359

Specialties - - $307,899 $497,563 - $805,461

Interior - $128,130 $266,097 $1,143,379 - $1,537,606

Plumbing $86,955 - $443,282 $67,050 - $597,288

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $217,495 $1,656,802 - - $1,874,297

Fire & Life Safety $396,356 $226,467 $77,941 - - $700,763

Site - $51,493 $104,860 - - $156,353

Other $599,423 - $453,755 - $96,326 $1,149,504

Mechanical - $3,256,695 $1,351,455 - - $4,608,150

Exterior - - $14,049 $110,561 - $124,610

Structural - - $122,523 - - $122,523

Roofing - $2,932 $57,987 - - $60,919

Total $1,082,734 $3,932,853 $7,240,361 $1,922,200 $96,326 $14,274,474








Page 145

EXHIBIT "B"



004

Lanier HS

004 Lanier High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)









Gross Area 262,640 19,978 282,618

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 329


Site Data

School Data

Storage 1 2008 120

Storage 1 2008 280

Storage 1 2008 4,000 0.0%

Storage 1 2008 300

Classroom 1 2009 8,605 6.2%

Vocational 1 1966 23,968 8.5%

Greenhouse 1 1968 600 16.8%

Greenhouse 1 1968 922 17.5%

Greenhouse 1 1966 922 17.5%

Mechanical 1 1966 4,680 82.8%

Vocational 1 1988 17,918 28.8%

Gymnasium 1 1966 49,133 19.9%

Theatre 1 1988 16,226

Building A 1 1966 134,966 28.4%


Building Data

22.1%


1201 Payton Gin Rd Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $224,289 $2,383,270 $155,096 - $2,762,655

Specialties - $162 $109,311 $610,386 - $719,858

Interior - $25,168 $1,408,999 $146,335 - $1,580,502

Plumbing $10,801 $649,540 $649,896 $405,324 - $1,715,561

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $138,856 $1,479,163 - - $1,618,020

Fire & Life Safety $421,914 $318,665 $84,442 $53,927 - $878,948

Site $5,002 - $40 $26,921 - $31,963

Mechanical $716,056 $925,758 $3,711,162 $241,574 - $5,594,550

Exterior - - $938,853 - - $938,853


Roofing - $2,145,237 $1,569,825 - - $3,715,062







Page 146

EXHIBIT "B"



004

Lanier HS

Other $175,164 - $324,594 - $176,389 $676,147


Total $1,328,937 $4,526,958 $12,659,556 $1,639,563 $176,389 $20,331,402



Page 147

EXHIBIT "B"



005

McCallum HS

005 McCallum High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)









Gross Area 242,667 16,896 259,563

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 301


Site Data

School Data

Building H 1 2010 3,000 5.1%

Storage 1 1978 464

Storage 1 1993 3,732 0.0%

Mechanical 1 1953 1,139

Gymnasium 1 1987 18,939 15.3%

Theatre 1 1987 28,997 10.0%

Mechanical 1 1953 2,364 11.1%

Building A 1 1953 184,032 25.1%


Building Data

20.4%


5600 Sunshine Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical $26,177 $111,580 $684,807 $76,795 - $899,360

Specialties - - $358,293 $528,359 - $886,652

Interior $6,604 $248,022 $444,731 $37,302 - $736,658

Plumbing - $42,530 $521,263 $104,347 - $668,141

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $207,162 $1,471,162 - - $1,678,325

Fire & Life Safety $382,481 $257,141 $52,833 - - $692,455

Site - - - - - $0

Other $559,210 - $348,702 - $2,583,395 $3,491,307

Mechanical - $469,522 $6,859,945 $615,536 - $7,945,003

Exterior $9,259 $5,115 - - - $14,374

Structural $149,521 - $2,577 - - $152,098

Roofing $16,328 $2,323,201 $120,293 - - $2,459,823

Total $1,149,580 $3,763,557 $10,864,608 $1,362,340 $2,583,395 $19,723,479








Page 148

EXHIBIT "B"



006

Reagan HS

006 Reagan High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)









Gross Area 249,609 3,072 252,681

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 447


Site Data

School Data

Vocational 1 1987 42,262 25.2%

Classroom 1 1967 42,718 10.7%

Building G 1 1965 24,939 14.4%

Mechanical 1 1965 4,549 8.7%

Vocational 1 1965 17,949 15.9%

Band 1 1965 2,982 10.0%

Gymnasium 1 1965 47,562 16.9%

Building B 1 1965 60,797 22.2%



Building Data

22.2%


7104 Berkman Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $290,110 $3,174,736 $202,900 - $3,667,746

Specialties - - $828,516 $503,119 - $1,331,634

Interior - $42,710 $1,052,884 $65,128 - $1,160,722

Plumbing $86,955 - $760,828 $41,511 - $889,295

Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641

Technology - $161,834 $1,431,591 - - $1,593,425

Fire & Life Safety $363,053 $207,769 $47,598 - - $618,421

Site - - $842,388 $2,292,227 - $3,134,615

Other $679,181 - $849,386 - $348,003 $1,876,570

Mechanical $79,120 $113,444 $3,936,964 $15,617 - $4,145,144

Exterior - - $16,637 - - $16,637


Roofing - - - - - $0

Total $1,208,310 $865,508 $12,941,528 $3,120,501 $348,003 $18,483,850








Page 149

EXHIBIT "B"



007

Travis HS

007 Travis High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)









Gross Area 285,098 9,696 294,794

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 451


Site Data

School Data

Mechanical 1 1975 1,600 32.9%

Mechanical 1 1953 2,273 34.8%

Mechanical 1 1971 492 23.1%

Vocational 1 1975 8,049 29.2%

Gymnasium 1 1953 47,962 23.1%

Gym/Café/Aud 1 1953 224,722 32.4%


Building Data

30.3%


1211 E. Oltorf Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $3,731,338 $150,106 - $3,881,444

Specialties - - $149,836 $559,681 - $709,518

Interior - $32,033 $1,355,776 $436,067 - $1,823,875

Plumbing $239,148 - $1,384,521 $86,379 - $1,710,048

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $143,401 $1,700,776 - - $1,844,176

Fire & Life Safety $412,008 $358,380 $55,450 - - $825,838

Site $8,435 $358,112 $485,606 - - $852,153

Other $270,043 - $315,501 - $870,745 $1,456,288

Mechanical $119,848 $575,471 $13,203,202 - - $13,898,521

Exterior - $34,640 $1,142,699 $35,140 - $1,212,479

Structural - $4,163 $23,558 - - $27,720

Roofing - $11,618 $772,169 $636,555 - $1,420,342

Total $1,049,482 $1,617,099 $24,320,432 $1,903,928 $870,745 $29,761,687








Page 150

EXHIBIT "B"



852

Clifton Center

852 Clifton Center Grades Served Alt. Ed. (Alt. Ed.)




2010-11 Out Migration

2010-11 In Migration


Utilization (by enrollment) n/a Percent of Capacity

Area (GSF) per student #Error n/a n/a

Gross Area 39,039 1,536 40,575

Perm Temp Total

2010-11 Campus Enrollment n/a



Parking Spaces 71


Site Data

School Data

Building B 1 1977 3,840 2.7%

Building A 1 1977 35,199 41.0%


Building Data

40.8%

Austin, Texas 78752 1977 NR No

1519 Coronado Hills Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - - $868,543 $5,148 - $873,691

Specialties - - $372,757 $191,515 - $564,272

Interior - $21,355 $127,350 $116,858 - $265,563

Plumbing - - $72,791 $57,050 - $129,841

Conveyances - $248,207 - - - $248,207

Technology - $59,277 $140,628 - - $199,905

Fire & Life Safety $54,766 $50,688 $8,983 - - $114,437

Site - $79,594 $88,237 $381,866 - $549,698

Other $200,538 - $91,510 - $36,615 $328,663

Mechanical - $1,301,989 $781,277 - - $2,083,266

Exterior - $8,004 $5,265 - - $13,269


Roofing - $20,585 - - - $20,585

Total $255,304 $1,789,699 $2,557,341 $752,437 $36,615 $5,391,397








Page 151

EXHIBIT "B"



012

Ridgeview ALC

012 Ridgeview ALC Grades Served 6-12 (Alt. Ed.)









Gross Area 88,677 9,216 97,893

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 120


Site Data

School Data

Building C 1 1968 3,201 49.7%

Building B 1 1970 1,167 24.2%

Building A 1 1953 84,309 36.6%


Building Data

34.4%

Austin, Texas 78702 1953 NR Yes

901 Neal Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $156,212 $1,172,948 $3,406 - $1,332,566

Specialties - - $233,156 $99,651 - $332,807

Interior - - $318,518 $315,973 - $634,491

Plumbing - - $533,477 $9,634 - $543,111


Technology - $74,845 $378,576 - - $453,421

Fire & Life Safety $163,727 $107,266 $16,480 - - $287,473

Site - - $57,810 $40,134 - $97,944

Other $230,098 - $90,170 - $32,018 $352,286

Mechanical $200,864 $693,247 $4,635,098 - - $5,529,209

Exterior - - $132,297 $1,000,183 - $1,132,480

Structural - $21,088 $7,827 - - $28,915

Roofing - - $183,006 - - $183,006

Total $594,690 $1,052,657 $7,759,365 $1,468,980 $32,018 $10,907,709








Page 152

EXHIBIT "B"



251

Rosedale

251 Rosedale School Grades Served Alt. Ed. (Alt. Ed.)









Gross Area 37,112 7,680 44,792

Perm Temp Total




Parking Spaces 43


Site Data

School Data

Building C 1 1940 658 15.8%

Building B 1 1939 460 8.8%

Building A 1 1939 35,994 33.4%


Building Data

32.5%

Austin, Texas 78756 1939 NR No

2117 W. 49th St. Yr. Open Rating Historic

Electrical - $191,593 $223,515 $27,644 - $442,752

Specialties - - $55,191 $72,979 - $128,170

Interior - - $242,847 $73,485 - $316,333

Plumbing $285,697 - $176,849 $32,233 - $494,778

Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283

Technology - $58,809 $230,056 - - $288,865

Fire & Life Safety $79,199 $50,972 - - - $130,171

Site - - $364,134 $40,134 - $404,267

Other $120,098 - $134,431 - $68,255 $322,784

Mechanical - $58,248 $1,503,258 - - $1,561,507

Exterior $7,439 $3,845 $539,718 $5,265 - $556,266


Roofing - - $20,585 - - $20,585

Total $492,433 $462,750 $3,490,585 $251,739 $68,255 $4,765,762








Page 153

EXHIBIT "B"

Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011

2010 Facility Master Plan

252 Baker Center3908 Avenue B, Austin Texas 78751

Current Use:

Past Use:

Campus Overview Perm Temp Total

Total Building Area (GSF) 65,868 - 65,868

Site Area (Acres) 4.8

Parking Spaces 60

Buildings Floors Date GSF FCI

Building A 1 1911 63,810 16.7%

Building B 1 1952 1,600 0.0%

Building C 1 1911 458 110.2%

Administration and Professional Development Center

Elementary School



Page 154

EXHIBIT "B"



951 Burger Athletic Complex3200 Jones Road, Austin Texas 78745

Current Use:

Past Use:




Parking Spaces


Building A 2 1977 70 39.7%

Building B Restroom 1 1977 5,832 9.7%

Building C Concession 1 1977 4,927 0.9%

Building D Restroom 1 1977 5,839 1.4%

Building E Ticket 1 1977 142 23.4%

Building F Restroom 1 1977 5,839 2.4%

Athletic complex

N/A

Building F Restroom 1 1977 5,839 2.4%

Building G Concession 1 1977 4,927 0.9%

Building H Restroom 1 1977 5,832 1.1%

Building I Ticket 1 1977 142 23.4%

Building J Ticket 1 1977 59 0.0%

Building K Press Box 2 1977 12,255 2.2%

Building L Ticket 1 1977 59 77.8%

Building M 1 1977 31,119 0.6%

Building N 1 1977 31,266 6.6%

Building O 3 1977 2,005 0.0%



Page 155

EXHIBIT "B"



941 Carruth Admin Center1111 W. 6th Street, Austin Texas 78703

Current Use:

Past Use:




Parking Spaces


Building A 4 1991 61,310 15.6%

Building B 4 1991 21,687 19.3%

Building C 1 3 11,821 21.6%

Building D 3 1991 15,948 22.1%

Building 4 1991 17 216 14 4%

Central Administration

Carruth was retail space prior to conversion to AISD administration

Building 4 1991 17,216 14.4%

Building P Parking 2 1991 6,007 32.0%



Page 156

EXHIBIT "B"



922 Central Warehouse3701 Woodbury Drive, Austin Texas 78704

Current Use:

Past Use:




Parking Spaces


Building A 1 1983 96,303 5.1%

AISD Warehouse

N/A



Page 157

EXHIBIT "B"



949 Delco Activity Center4601 Pecan Brook Drive, Austin Texas 78724

Current Use:

Past Use:




Parking Spaces


Building A 3 2003 60,294 3.4%

Athletic faciltiies and Athletic administration

N/A



Page 158

EXHIBIT "B"



948 House Park1301 Shoal Creek Blvd, Austin Texas 78701

Current Use:

Past Use:




Parking Spaces


Building A 1 1940 3,325 0.0%

Building B 1 1986 2,106 0.0%

Building C 1 1940 213 0.0%

Building D 1 1940 294 0.0%

Building E 1 1963 358 0.0%

Building F 1 1940 96 17.9%

Athletic complex

N/A

Building F 1 1940 96 17.9%

Building G 1 2000 64 0.0%

Building H 1 1963 240 94.4%

Building I 1 1940 215 0.0%

Building J 1 1940 248 0.0%

Building K 1 1939 12,473 1.0%

Building L 1 1936 11,331 0.8%

Building M 2 1938 573 11.2%

Building N 2 1938 573 11.2%



Page 159

EXHIBIT "B"



281 Nelson Field7400 Berkman Drive, Austin Texas 78752

Current Use:

Past Use:




Parking Spaces


Building A 1 1963 2,880 43.1%

Building B 1 1963 374 59.6%

Building C 1 1963 796 93.5%

Building D 1 1963 320 48.2%

Building E 1 1963 320 58.7%

Building F 1 1963 374 59.2%

Athletic complex

N/A

Building F 1 1963 374 59.2%

Building G 1 1963 796 7.5%

Building H 1 1963 320 51.8%

Building I 1 1963 320 56.7%

Building J 1 1963 800 19.9%

Building K 1 1963 64 0.0%

Building L 1 1963 80 29.8%

Building M 1 1963 64 0.0%

Building N 4 1963 21,773 0.6%

Building O 1 1963 19,455 0.0%

Building P 1 1963 10,269 2.0%



Page 160

EXHIBIT "B"



959 Nelson Field Bus Terminal7400 Berkman Drive, Austin Texas 78752

Current Use:

Past Use:


Total Building Area (GSF) 13,093 1,536 14,629


Parking Spaces


Building A 1 1995 13,093 4.9%

Portable P097 1 1969 1,536 68.3%

Bus Terminal

N/A



Page 161

EXHIBIT "B"



950 Noack Sports Complex5300 Crainway Drive, Austin Texas 78724

Current Use:

Past Use:




Parking Spaces


Building A 1 2004 1,242 0.4%

Building B 1 2004 1,520 4.1%

Building C 1 2004 101 0.0%

Building D 1 2004 101 0.0%

Building E 1 2004 76 0.0%

Building F 1 2004 96 0.0%

Athletic complex

N/A

Building F 1 2004 96 0.0%

Building G 1 2004 96 0.0%



Page 162

EXHIBIT "B"



960 Saegert Transportation3300 Jones Road, Austin Texas 78745

Current Use:

Past Use:


Total Building Area (GSF) 26,916 1,536 28,452


Parking Spaces


Building A 1 2004 1,242 0.0%

Building B 1 2004 1,520 0.0%

Building C 1 2004 101 0.0%

Building D 1 2004 101 0.0%

Bus Terminal

N/A



Page 163

EXHIBIT "B"



962 Service Center5101 E. 51st Street, Austin Texas 78723

Current Use:

Past Use:




Parking Spaces


Building A 3 1991 27,435 15.3%

Building B 1 1991 11,219 7.0%

Building C 2 2000 6,602 4.8%

Building D 1 1995 848 0.0%

Building E 1 2007 8,203 0.0%

Maintenance and Administration

N/A



Page 164

EXHIBIT "B"


Educational Framework

The following Educational Framework was used as a planning tool to aid in decision making by the Facility Master Plan Task Force. It was not a mandate, but a set of guidelines, and was intended to be flexible in order to align resources that will provide optimal learning environments for all AISD students. The guiding principle for teaching and learning, as set by the Board of Trustees, is performance-based empowerment and earned autonomy. 1. Planning Guidelines

A. Priorities for Decision Making and Optimal Learning Environments

1) Safety and Security 2) Equitable Learning Opportunities for All

Students - Ensure that all facilities offer Alternative Learning Education programs and are in full compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

3) Quality Facility Conditions a. Physical condition and safety b. Support for academic programs c. Indoor-air quality – e.g. proper ventilation, monitoring of indoor pollutants d. Natural lighting e. Environmental condition f. Green Building concepts – e.g. energy, water and materials efficiency g. Application of current and emerging technology – e.g. wireless networks h. Site acreage

i. Campus layout and organization j. Neighborhood accessibility k. Feeder pattern impact

4) School Performance - The Board may consider a campus intervention, including closure or repurposing, for schools that have not met academic criteria established by the District, state or federal accountability systems.

5) Facility Utilization a. Facility condition b. Capacity c. Enrollment d. Economic efficiency e. Intensity of use

Page 165

EXHIBIT "B"


B. Facility Utilization Alternatives

1) Portable/Temporary Classrooms – The Facility Master Plan seeks to reduce the number of portable/temporary classrooms. When additional classrooms are needed and are anticipated to be needed over time, the Facility Master Plan will include plans to replace portable/temporary buildings with permanent buildings.

2) Shared Use of Facilities – The AISD Facility Master Plan will, wherever possible, provide access to school facilities for outside programs in order to create and promote successful community-school partnerships.

C. School Closure, Consolidation and Boundaries –

The AISD Facility Master Plan Task Force will consider recommending options for adjusting boundaries and the consolidation or repurposing of schools to balance enrollment with capacity, to ensure an optimal learning environment for all students, and to realize necessary economic efficiencies. The AISD Facility Master Plan Task Force will continue to consider criteria and options for schools that are not successful in providing adequate and/or equitable learning environments. 1) Transfer Policy – When possible, reduce the

number of transfers to align with the efficient use of facilities.

2. Programmatic Considerations

A. School Size 1) The following school-size targets are

guidelines based on community input that, fiscally, may be achievable only through creative design concepts, such as multiple schools sharing the same campus. It is unlikely that every large school will reduce its enrollment to match these specifications. Therefore, it is necessary to exercise flexibility with these general guideline, which should also be applied to site-specific and/or program-specific facilities. The utilization target is 85% - 105%.

Elementary Schools 300-500 students Middle Schools 600-800 students High Schools 1,500-2,000 students

2) The following school size standards have been utilized by AISD for construction of new school facilities since the 1996 Bond Program.

Elementary Schools 720-800 students Middle Schools 1,100 students High Schools 2,200-2,400 students

B. Grade Configuration – The current AISD grade

configuration for each facility will remain. Recommendations may be developed for schools in which flexibility in configuration might better meet student and neighborhood needs.

Page 166

EXHIBIT "B"


C. Student Assignment – When developing facility options, student assignment would optimally be based on the following:

Elementary Schools - Neighborhood Schools / Vertical Alignment Middle Schools - Neighborhood Schools/ Vertical Alignment and Choice (depending upon which option provides the best level of consistency for students). High Schools - Vertical Alignment and Choice

D. Transportation of Choice Students –

Transportation should not be provided to students attending schools outside of their attendance area by choice, with the exception of those opting for choice due to No Child Left Behind or for those students whose applications have been approved for enrollment in a Magnet School (Open Enrollment Signature Program).

E. Fine Arts - The AISD Facility Master Plan Task

Force will seek opportunities to support increasing and enhancing the availability and quality of Fine Arts programs.

F. Vertical Team Signature Programs – The AISD

Facility Master Plan Task Force will seek opportunities to support increasing and enhancing the availability and quality of Signature Programs, which are offered in each school and/or vertical team. These programs are interest-based, and transportation is not

provided by the District [e.g. International Baccalaureate, Global Studies, Early College High School, Early College Start, etc.].

G. Magnet Schools (Open Enrollment Signature

Programs) - The AISD Facility Master Plan Task Force will seek opportunities to support increasing and enhancing the availability and quality of Magnet Schools that offer a specialized curriculum that draws students across boundaries, requires an application, and transportation is provided [e.g., LASA, Kealing, Fulmore, Ann Richards]. The Facility Master Plan Task Force will utilize community input to assist the District in developing other categories, if needed, for programs that do not fit existing definitions and criteria.

H. Athletic Programs - The AISD Facility Master Plan

Task Force will seek opportunities to support increasing and enhancing the availability and quality of athletic programs and facilities. The plan will also address the facilities that receive more frequent and intensive use.

I. Career and Technical Programs - The AISD

Facility Master Plan Task Force will seek opportunities to support increasing and enhancing the availability and quality of Career and Technical Programs [e.g., Cosmetology, Culinary Arts, etc.].

J. Pre-Kindergarten/Early Childhood Programs –

Pre-K and early childhood services should be

Page 167

EXHIBIT "B"


expanded to the greatest extent that is economically feasible to serve all children of the community.

K. Student Services – The AISD Facility Master Plan

Task Force will seek opportunities to provide space for student services based on the demographic and economic needs of the student population.

L. Administrative Spaces - Administrative buildings

and spaces will be reviewed and recommendations developed as part of the comprehensive Facility Master Plan.

Page 168

EXHIBIT "B"


Enrollment Projections

Historical Enrollment The Austin Independent School District has experienced a significant increase in enrollment, over 7,500 students, during the past nine years. Since 2002-03, student enrollment has increased by an average of approximately 835 students, or 11% each year. The current school year, 2010-11, had a notable increase of an additional 933 students. Specifically, enrollment increased by 610 elementary, 246 middle, and 54 high school students.

The graph below illustrates the progression of enrollment changes by year.

Historical Enrollment – By Grade Level The Austin Independent School District experienced growth from 2002-03 to 2010-11 in all grade levels. Enrollment in grades Pre-K - 5 increased by a total of 7,233 students. Enrollment in grades 6 - 8 increased by a total of 88 students. Enrollment in grades 9-12 increased by a total of 199 students. The graph below and the chart on the following page indicate enrollment by grade over the past nine years.

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

AISD Historic Enrollment by Grade Level

2002-03 to 2010-11

PK-5

6-8

"9-12"

Source: AISD Office of Facilities

010,00020,00030,00040,00050,00060,00070,00080,00090,000

100,000

AISD Historic Enrollment 2002-03 to 2010-2011

Source: AISD Office of Facilities

Page 169

EXHIBIT "B"


Historical Enrollment – By Grade Level The following chart depicts the progression of increasing enrollment throughout the previous nine years.

Grade 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

EC & PreK 4,421 4,704 5,125 4,943 4,933 5,053 5,044 5,406 5,564

Kindergarten 6,431 6,728 6,849 7,462 7,309 7,391 7,589 7,668 7,660

1 6,405 6,512 6,898 7,055 7,493 7,297 7,498 7,543 7,644

2 6,115 6,235 6,373 6,669 6,898 7,107 7,027 7,354 7,225

3 6,104 6,013 6,174 6,278 6,571 6,617 6,856 6,796 7,102

4 5,866 5,912 5,897 6,073 6,136 6,254 6,477 6,595 6,679

5 5,592 5,754 5,676 5,823 5,870 5,847 6,028 6,195 6,293

Subtotal PK-5 40,934 41,858 42,992 44,303 45,210 45,566 46,519 47,557 48,167

6 5,582 5,390 5,517 5,379 5,511 5,506 5,519 5,568 5,740

7 5,655 5,517 5,278 5,443 5,344 5,300 5,421 5,425 5,513

8 5,252 5,507 5,423 5,258 5,337 5,278 5,229 5,338 5,324

Subtotal 6-8 16,489 16,414 16,218 16,080 16,192 16,084 16,169 16,331 16,577

9 6,764 6,371 6,512 6,332 6,313 6,371 6,366 6,252 6,127

10 5,093 5,321 4,962 5,337 5,183 5,043 5,084 5,148 5,212

11 4,427 4,389 4,694 4,423 4,576 4,588 4,569 4,644 4,724

12 4,179 4,048 4,126 4,368 4,118 4,590 4,511 4,564 4,599

Subtotal 9-12 20,463 20,129 20,294 20,460 20,190 20,592 20,530 20,608 20,662

Separate Campuses 318 239 271 339 350 329 337 311 332

Special Campuses 207 119 121 113 121 168 175 189 191

Subtotal Sep & Spec 525 358 392 452 471 497 512 500 523

Total 78,411 78,759 79,896 81,295 82,063 82,739 83,730 84,996 85,929Source: AISD Office of Facilities

Historical Enrollment

2002-03 to 2010-2011


Page 170

EXHIBIT "B"


SCHOOL NAME 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Allan E S 464 494 492 470 441 436 426 446 398 389 392 379Allison E S 480 485 480 452 467 486 484 509 500 520 520 543Andrews E S 654 652 601 609 581 586 586 615 611 630 573 717Baldwin E S 508Baranoff E S 647 698 777 759 812 782 822 771 788 849 856 876Barrington E S 660 670 655 703 693 778 746 752 821 866 929 996Barton Hills E S 402 362 330 319 343 339 354 360 360 374 375 386Becker E S 307 281 250 257 253 256 265 232 215 214 194 208Blackshear E S 449 417 378 317 357 309 326 277 272 264 239 244Blanton E S 824 701 635 668 622 619 608 563 564 547 555 591Blazier E S - - - - - - - - 445 596 720 775Boone E S 728 673 627 587 559 561 575 553 538 568 502 501Brentwood E S 503 468 436 414 405 389 367 413 433 447 476 495Brooke E S 412 374 360 291 281 337 372 352 344 410 423 439Brown E S 606 651 534 589 548 550 508 517 508 519 506 519Bryker Woods E S 394 422 403 369 371 376 397 427 395 401 398 404Campbell E S 655 646 638 550 498 428 414 400 350 378 396 360Casey E S 565 641 768 858 959 937 955 914 754 665 663 669Casis E S 725 667 626 647 681 677 700 743 780 831 818 825Clayton E S - - - - - - - 599 811 996 974 867Cook E S 1,022 719 713 791 823 903 953 811 845 892 906 901Cowan E S - 393 457 458 500 512 529 557 649 707 741 783Cunningham E S 638 581 613 634 611 581 609 544 538 536 550 512Davis E S 638 618 588 587 644 631 673 671 619 623 694 683Dawson E S 464 447 469 415 420 381 362 371 362 335 335 331Doss E S 666 667 652 659 669 623 627 645 659 677 719 768Galindo E S 749 759 730 715 771 771 790 740 744 727 717 704Govalle E S 630 562 459 480 438 440 416 391 383 419 394 415Graham E S 619 586 573 666 633 713 676 698 678 633 658 761Gullett E S 455 440 423 432 466 457 460 447 464 481 537 541Harris E S 970 931 647 587 589 612 684 716 689 694 740 758Hart E S 652 641 599 613 662 749 923 891 803 835 849 898Highland Park E S 559 536 529 506 501 493 518 530 557 601 632 662Hill E S 772 683 703 701 737 737 740 730 665 701 689 732Houston E S 915 814 839 850 863 872 897 942 923 936 949 917Jordan E S 725 763 800 696 629 624 622 690 619 743 814 833Joslin E S 401 383 394 413 400 377 346 355 350 332 326 363Kiker E S 1,058 771 720 753 836 881 993 711 697 717 904 933

Austin Independent School District Historic Enrollment 1999/ 2000 - 2010/ 2011

Historical Enrollment by School

Elementary Schools

Page 171

EXHIBIT "B"


SCHOOL NAME 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Kocurek E S 741 650 623 579 588 606 682 682 654 678 644 660Langford E S 819 855 824 850 828 901 999 835 859 844 841 834Lee E S 371 367 395 359 375 374 383 411 401 406 440 428Linder E S 621 663 724 853 862 1,000 819 874 931 879 842 892Maplewood E S 370 316 331 313 324 342 348 332 346 373 428 406Mathews E S 372 326 345 391 386 409 393 432 418 417 392 405McBee E S - 558 601 638 707 777 822 650 704 758 785 765Menchaca E S 426 543 598 638 664 715 809 898 678 626 698 686Metz E S 662 632 658 602 518 542 661 668 592 553 492 498Mills E S 697 761 815 819 860 912 953 893 974 1,061 1,100 928Norman E S 512 547 504 553 571 598 578 586 397 372 326 333Oak Hill E S 812 781 762 763 814 837 837 896 926 950 1,008 772Oak Springs E S 409 412 383 363 342 289 283 284 317 313 311 274Odom E S 751 741 782 768 746 763 776 785 761 711 688 658Ortega E S 365 357 360 300 290 277 283 280 253 254 286 296Overton E S - - - - - - - - 543 647 715 668Palm E S 628 652 622 693 830 886 991 725 644 662 650 606Patton E S 832 823 833 812 829 804 785 777 745 726 763 914Pease E S 238 248 257 236 238 251 252 247 254 254 252 256Pecan Springs E S 560 592 585 602 569 584 556 545 554 497 516 532Perez E S - - - - - - - 655 742 705 805 886Pickle E S - - 613 594 593 581 638 660 685 710 729 740Pillow E S 481 440 412 405 460 473 524 529 552 563 652 653Pleasant Hill E S 561 525 504 515 532 585 624 655 587 623 632 619Read E C E S - - - - - - - 364 559 549 477 509Reilly E S 309 283 273 245 279 231 254 285 268 258 303 296Ridgetop E S 259 257 239 208 248 230 238 199 211 201 191 219Rodriguez E S 691 723 684 750 725 780 872 901 946 973 955 910St E lmo E S 431 422 439 490 494 484 437 449 421 360 353 585Sanchez E S 503 485 420 390 448 450 659 658 551 610 611 277Sims E S 299 303 332 322 365 388 408 416 417 415 319 304Summitt E S 631 622 596 639 585 629 601 576 559 701 750 854Sunset Valley E S 584 592 564 516 506 505 481 437 435 448 463 451Travis Heights E S 568 501 502 527 457 518 562 573 587 564 525 537Walnut Creek E S 969 994 877 942 983 1,052 1,078 971 955 763 900 916Widen E S 733 804 756 791 765 820 782 796 846 825 794 769Williams E S 709 651 637 606 645 624 616 620 627 694 664 642Winn E S 586 604 629 665 635 621 671 672 514 432 441 463Wooldridge E S 1,062 748 754 718 773 821 806 946 833 841 888 878Wooten E S 632 640 613 593 588 578 603 638 633 682 688 695Zavala E S 419 468 433 432 434 443 462 492 459 439 393 407Zilker E S 421 433 440 496 511 541 480 451 478 495 524 522

E lementary Total 42,442 41,915 41,617 41,791 42,430 43,424 44,729 45,626 45,947 46,885 47,897 48740


Elementary Schools cont.

Page 172

EXHIBIT "B"


Middle Schools

SCHOOL NAME 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Bailey MS 1,529 1,217 1,173 1,144 1,099 1,074 1,134 1,175 1,147 1,206 959 1,041Bedichek MS 1,136 1,004 998 889 904 908 912 1,039 1,150 1,119 1,018 1,054Burnet MS 1,126 1,065 1,063 1,008 1,084 1,045 970 1,005 988 912 969 998Covington MS 752 855 939 945 911 889 862 910 1,014 954 950 805Dobie MS 874 913 921 763 746 739 808 849 517 566 603 630Fulmore MS 764 749 872 957 992 1,054 1,037 1,029 1,045 1,036 1,007 995Garcia MS - - - - - - - - 605 649 689 658Gorzycki MS - - - - - - - - - - 835 963Kealing MS 958 1,058 978 948 1,029 1,277 1,190 1,251 1,215 1,279 1,242 1,233Lamar MS 915 855 798 779 791 701 675 671 741 780 668 604Martin MS 495 622 632 648 736 738 676 702 760 744 691 639Mendez MS 1,313 874 857 828 840 776 840 1,108 1,029 903 871 890Murchison MS 1,236 1,232 1,240 1,213 1,210 1,227 1,257 1,216 1,156 1,156 1,254 1,281O. Henry MS 681 743 866 887 885 801 747 789 881 982 1,005 1,026Paredes MS - 959 1,060 1,208 1,227 1,292 1,330 1,067 989 957 899 930Pearce MS 958 849 859 852 847 801 810 809 580 516 452 329Richards ( 6-8) MS - - - - - - - - 224 334 362 378Small MS 929 1,054 1,080 1,108 1,129 1,088 1,114 1,140 1,167 1,188 944 959Webb MS 805 777 779 789 767 748 663 658 495 522 573 591

Middle School Total 14,471 14,826 15,115 14,966 15,197 15,158 15,025 15,418 15,703 15,803 15,991 16,004


Page 173

EXHIBIT "B"


High Schools

SCHOOL NAME 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11Akins HS - 1,076 1,544 2,053 2,219 2,257 2,389 2,359 2,507 2,663 2,710 2,720Anderson HS 1,804 1,742 1,763 1,959 1,959 1,997 2,121 2,013 2,093 2,096 2,000 2,089Austin HS 2,167 2,014 2,136 2,149 2,158 2,245 2,207 2,124 2,240 2,343 2,390 2,337Bowie HS 3,045 2,608 2,435 2,370 2,485 2,613 2,699 2,821 2,778 2,768 2,828 2,876Crockett HS 2,529 2,414 2,174 2,099 1,999 1,962 2,038 1,992 1,907 1,857 1,763 1,686E astside HS 1,826 1,479 1,359 1,008 975 1,068 775 760 691 556 679 718Garza HS 318 339 384 347 307 266 280 308 315 301 258 260International HS - - - - - - 258 264 185 202 230 176LASA HS - - - - - - - - 858 860 874 881LBJ HS 1,619 1,654 1,812 1,811 1,717 1,671 1,676 1,703 1,001 1,046 1,018 1,000Lanier HS 1,855 1,762 1,666 1,915 1,794 1,793 1,674 1,619 1,693 1,608 1,594 1,624McCallum HS 1,666 1,652 1,676 1,705 1,709 1,686 1,724 1,706 1,717 1,733 1,793 1,824Reagan HS 1,405 1,394 1,276 1,304 1,169 1,064 1,029 989 973 988 958 901Richards 9th and 10th - - - - - - - - - - 79 150Travis HS 1,709 1,691 1,665 1,718 1,638 1,672 1,590 1,532 1,634 1,509 1,434 1,420

High School Total 19,943 19,825 19,890 20,438 20,129 20,294 20,460 20,190 20,592 20,530 20,608 20,662

Separate Campuses 102 44 311 318 239 271 339 350 329 337 311 332

Special Campuses 159 145 155 207 119 121 113 121 168 175 189 191

District Total 77,117 76,755 77,088 77,720 78,114 79,268 80,666 81,705 82,739 83,730 84,996 85,929


Page 174

EXHIBIT "B"


Birth Data

Historical birth data for the 31 zip codes comprising the District was collected. The total number of live births for this area has steadily increased from 1994 to 2008. In 1994, there were 9,175 births compared to 12,733 in 2008. A slight decline of 45 births followed in 2009. The increase in births points to continued growth at the elementary school level. Live birth data is commonly used to predict future kindergarten enrollment.

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

Live Births by Yearin Zip Codes within AISD Boundaries

Source: Texas Department of State Health Services & the Dennis D. Harner and Associates Demographic Analysis & E nrollment Projections, 2010

Year Births1994 9,1751995 9,4171996 9,6501997 9,8221998 10,3291999 10,8292000 11,4262001 11,3462002 11,1602003 11,2702004 11,4922005 11,3832006 12,5392007 12,7442008 12,7332009 12,688

Austin Independent School Distr ict

Live Births1994-2009

Source: Texas Department of State Health Services & the Dennis D. Harner and Associates Demographic Analysis & E nrollment Projections, 2010

Page 175

EXHIBIT "B"


Projected Enrollment In 2010, AISD commissioned Dennis D. Harner and Associates to develop enrollment projections. According to this report, the total projected enrollment for AISD is expected to increase by 12,356 students, or 14.4%, from the 2010-11 school year to the 2020-21 school year. The enrollment forecasts were calculated using a “cohort survival” method. Each grade (cohort) is advanced from one year to the next based upon historical trends. Live birth data is also collected and used to compare the relationship between kindergarten and enrollment five years later. A cohort (grade) is advanced from one grade to the next based upon historical trends. The number of live births, and subsequently, the number of children, enrolled in kindergarten, has steadily increased since 2002.

Projected Enrollment – By Grade Level Projected enrollment for the 2011-12 through 2020-21 school years shows a steady increase in enrollment in all grade levels. At the elementary level, which reflects Pre-K through Grade 5, the projected enrollment shows an increase of 5,225 students from the 2010-11 school year to the 2020-21 school year. Similarly, the middle school enrollment, which reflects Grades 6 through 8, shows an increase of 3,334 students. The high school level, reflecting Grades 9 through 12, shows an increase of 4,166 students during this same timeframe. The table below shows projected enrollment by year and grade level.

Source: Dennis D. Harner & Associates Demographic Analysis and E nrollment Projections, 2010

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

Mid-Range Total Projected Enrollment

2011-12 to 2020-2021

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

AISD Projected Enrollment by Grade Level

2011-12 to 2020-21

PK-5

6-8

9-12

Page 176

EXHIBIT "B"


Projected Enrollment – By Grade Level The following chart depicts the progression of increasing enrollment throughout the next ten years.

Grade 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

E C & PreK 5,368 5,419 5,471 5,524 5,575 5,628 5,679 5,731 5,782 5,834

Kindergarten 7,773 7,848 7,923 7,998 8,073 8,148 8,223 8,298 8,373 8,448

1 7,757 7,832 7,907 7,982 8,057 8,132 8,207 8,282 8,357 8,432

2 7,426 7,532 7,607 7,682 7,757 7,832 7,907 7,982 8,057 8,132

3 6,988 7,176 7,282 7,357 7,432 7,507 7,582 7,657 7,732 7,807

4 6,926 6,788 6,976 7,082 7,157 7,232 7,307 7,382 7,457 7,532

5 6,423 6,676 6,538 6,726 6,832 6,907 6,982 7,057 7,132 7,207

Subtotal PK-5 48,661 49,271 49,704 50,351 50,883 51,386 51,887 52,389 52,890 53,392

6 5,952 6,073 6,326 6,188 6,376 6,482 6,557 6,632 6,707 6,782

7 5,677 5,877 5,998 6,251 6,113 6,301 6,407 6,482 6,557 6,632

8 5,471 5,617 5,817 5,938 6,191 6,053 6,241 6,347 6,422 6,497

Subtotal 6-8 17,100 17,567 18,141 18,377 18,680 18,836 19,205 19,461 19,686 19,911

9 6,497 6,621 6,767 6,967 7,088 7,341 7,203 7,391 7,497 7,572

10 4,882 5,197 5,321 5,467 5,667 5,788 6,041 5,903 6,091 6,197

11 4,623 4,382 4,697 4,821 4,967 5,167 5,288 5,541 5,403 5,591

12 4,761 4,648 4,407 4,722 4,846 4,992 5,192 5,313 5,566 5,428

Subtotal 9-12 20,763 20,848 21,192 21,977 22,568 23,288 23,724 24,148 24,557 24,788

Total 86,524 87,686 89,037 90,705 92,131 93,510 94,816 95,998 97,133 98,091

Source: Dennis D. Harner & Associates Demographic Analysis and E nrollment Projections, 2010


Mid-Range Projected E nrollment 2010-11 to 2019-20

Page 177

EXHIBIT "B"


Year Constructed Pre 1925 1925 - 1944 1945 - 1964 1965 - 1984 1985 - 1994 1995 - 2004 2005 - 2010Total Square Feet 209,259 547,147 3,083,806 3,481,972 2,363,533 1,616,514 1,026,591

Building Count 5 33 90 77 65 59 33

Capacity Analysis

How many students can a building accommodate? This question often arises, and in the development of a facility master plan, can be one of the most debated issues. It is not uncommon to review an evaluation of an existing building only to find that the capacity which was once assigned to the building is considerably more than what the building can reasonably accommodate today. The main reason for this is that the programs in a public school system and the manner in which they are delivered have changed significantly since the building was originally built. More than half the square footage in AISD was built before 1985. Twenty-five years ago, computer labs were just beginning to be incorporated into schools, and severely handicapped students, previously assigned to specialized facilities, were not yet mainstreamed into public schools. In addition, state legislation has mandated smaller student/teacher ratios. In facility planning, the term design capacity is used to describe simply counting the number of classrooms in a building and multiplying by an average class size. Even though at first glance this seems only to be common sense, this methodology does not take into account the programmatic implications of school facilities.

In AISD, functional capacity is reviewed on an annual basis. Functional capacity is a more realistic analysis of what a building can accommodate and takes into account all special programs available at the school that year, in addition to any portable buildings located on site, to determine how many students can be assigned to a particular school campus each school year. For master planning purposes, an updated methodology to the former AISD permanent capacity methodology was developed and applied. The formula for long-range planning should reflect District programs, but should be kept simple and equitable since programs change from year to year while classroom square footages remain, for the most part, the same. Permanent capacity does not incorporate temporary or portable classrooms, but only permanent space. Elementary School Permanent Capacity The elementary program is usually delivered based on students being assigned to a home room and attending special programs such as art, music, and physical education in a specialized classroom. The number of special classrooms required is reflective of the total number of students enrolled and is subtracted from the total number of classrooms since the vacated home room cannot be utilized by other students.

Age of AISD Permanent Buildings

Page 178

EXHIBIT "B"


A 95% efficiency factor is applied since students do not always arrive in perfect sets of 22 students. Additionally, due to reduced class size and increased support space needs for Title 1 schools, an 85% efficiency factor is applied to compute permanent capacity at these facilities. The following describes the permanent capacity methodology for elementary schools. Count permanent classrooms. Subtract special areas for music, art, etc. (3-7

classrooms based on staffing ratios). Multiply by 22 (average class size). Apply 95% efficiency factor; 85% efficiency factor

for Title 1 schools.

Secondary School Permanent Capacity Unlike elementary schools, at the secondary level students are not in self-contained environments but are traveling from one location to another each period. All classrooms are counted including the specialized spaces. Since it is difficult to schedule every teaching space every period of the day, in addition to the

movement to block scheduling, an efficiency factor of 75% is applied.

The following describes the permanent capacity methodology for secondary schools. Count permanent classrooms. Multiply by 28 (average class size). Apply 75% efficiency factor; 70% efficiency factor

for Title 1 schools.

Core Capacity Core capacity is defined as those spaces that large groups of students utilize at some point during the school day, including the cafeteria, gymnasium, and library. As part of the new methodology, consideration was given to lower permanent capacity if the cafeteria or gymnasium was less than 85% of permanent capacity, based on the number of classrooms. The chart below shows the AISD standard for core space sizes based on the current approved educational standards.

Grade Level

School Size

(# of students)

Total

Square Feet SF/Student

Total


Total


Elementary 880 4,200 4.77 3,000 3.41 3,500 3.98

Middle 1,100 4,500 4.10 13,400 12.18 4,800 4.36

High 2,400 9,000 3.75 20,720 8.63 8,400 3.50

Source: AISD, Office of Facilities

Cafeteria Gym LibraryCore Space Standards

Page 179

EXHIBIT "B"


Utilization Utilization, or efficiency, of a school facility, is calculated by dividing the enrollment of the school by its permanent capacity. The target range as determined by the Facility Master Plan Task Force for the purposes of long-range planning is 85%-105%. Schools below 85% may be able to provide relief for overcrowded schools or may be considered as potential candidates for closure or consolidation. Schools above 105% should be monitored for additional growth, and schools that exceed 125% are considered for additions or for relief through the construction of new schools. The chart below indicates that district-wide, AISD is within the 85%-105% target range; however, by grade level, the elementary schools are above the target and the middle schools are below. In other words, the District is short 3,833 seats at the elementary level, but has 4,263 too many at the middle school level. On an individual basis, there are 29 schools, or 25% of all school campuses, that fall below 85% of permanent capacity. Fifty-three schools, or 46% of all school campuses, operate at above 105%. The map to the right and the ones on the following pages illustrate the 2010-11 school year enrollment utilization.

Grade Level

2010

Enrollment

Permanent

Capacity

Utilization

Rate

Elementary 48,738 44,905 109%

Middle 16,154 20,417 79%

High 20,512 21,698 95%

Districtwide 85,404 87,020 98%

Source: AISD, Office of Facilities

Page 180

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 181

EXHIBIT "B"


Enrollment versus Population

The population (number of students that live within an attendance zone) is not always equal to the enrollment (number of students that attend) of a school. No Child Left Behind, transfer policies, and open enrollment signature programs are some of the reasons students migrate in and out of their assigned attendance zones. In a few cases in AISD, students migrating into a school comprise more than 40% of its enrollment. When large numbers of students travel outside of the boundary of their assigned school, to attend a different school, it presents a challenge when planning for long-term facility needs. Because the number of students migrating in and out of an attendance zone may vary year to year, it is important to also look at the attendance zone population. Population projections, which are derived from birth data, census data, and housing stock analysis are used in long-range planning efforts to identify trends in growth and decline. Population projections are more reliable than anticipating the rates of in and out migration. The following maps provide the 2010-11 population as a percent of permanent capacity by school. This provides a different picture than the enrollment utilization maps on the preceding pages. For example, a school that falls below the target utilization of 85% based on enrollment may in fact be above 85% based on population.

Page 182

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 183

EXHIBIT "B"


= Facility Condition Index (FCI)

Facility Condition Analysis Facility condition is the state of repair of the building infrastructure. Facility condition takes into consideration all of the building systems from roofs and windows to electrical and mechanical systems. Although there is a cost associated with renovating every building according to current codes and standards, this does not mean that all schools need massive and immediate repairs and renovations. Rather, this provides an understanding of the effort it would take to bring all facilities up to the same standard. The facility condition information does provide the following. Comparative analysis of building conditions Approximate cost to address the facility conditions

of all buildings in the District Understanding of which buildings are in the worse

conditions and that might be slated for more immediate focus

Since 1991, the facility management industry has used an index called the Facility Condition Index (FCI) to benchmark the relative condition of a group of schools. This index simply divides the identified repair costs in a facility by the total cost to replace the facility. For example, take a 100,000 square foot building that might theoretically cost $10 million to construct new and now has $1 million in identified repairs. Dividing $1 million by $10 million results in an FCI of 10 percent. Industry standards and financial modeling dictate that FCI numbers above 65% or greater are more cost-effective to replace than to repair. This is due to efficiency gains with more modern facilities and the value of the building at the end of the analysis period.

Of course, FCI is not the only factor used to identify buildings that need renovation, replacement or even closure. Historical significance, enrollment trends, community sentiment, and the availability of capital are additional factors that are analyzed when making school facility decisions. The chart below indicates the distribution of campuses by ranges of FCI in AISD. Please note that the support facilities are included. Only one facility, Pease ES, falls into the replace category; however, two schools, Zilker ES and Wooten ES are between 50-59% and should be considered for major renovation or replacement.

Cost of Repairs

Cost of Replacement

FCI Campuses

<10% 18

10-19% 35

20-29% 30

30-39% 31

40-49% 9

50-59% 2

60-69% -

70-79% 1

80-89% -

90-100% -

>100% -

Total 126

Repair

Renovate

Replace

Page 184

EXHIBIT "B"


Replacement Costs Cost/Sq.ft. Replacement Cost

PreK Centers 297.47$ 4,783,318$

Elementary School 297.47$ 24,541,275$

Middle School 327.40$ 55,658,000$

High School 323.11$ 106,626,300$

Alt. Ed. School 327.40$ 6,548,000$

Admin 280.61$ 5,612,200$

Support 280.61$ 5,612,200$

Maintenance - Transportation 280.61$ 5,612,200$

Portable Building 138.93$ 213,396$

FCI: The Denominator The denominator is the bottom part of the equation and possibly the easiest with which to start. The denominator is the theoretical cost to replace the facility. It is important to recognize that this cost is based on the replacement of a building with another facility that is the same size and is fully code compliant. If, for example, you are comparing the FCI on a 3,450 square foot gymnasium building at a campus, the replacement cost is the theoretical cost to replace that same 3,450 square foot building. Since the replacement cost comparison is primarily driven by the type of facility (elementary school, middle school, high school, administration, etc.), a set of cost models have been developed that estimate the cost per square foot for new construction and are indicated in the chart to the right. The cost models take into account national industry averages from a recognized industry data source called RSMeans®, adjusted to Austin, Texas, as well as the District’s recent experience in the Austin construction market. The costs per square foot are then multiplied by the size of the school or building under consideration. This methodology is used for both permanent and portable buildings. FCI: The Numerator The numerator is the estimated cost to complete the repairs on the building in its current condition. This repair cost is generally considered to be like-for-like repairs. Within reason, the deficient conditions would be repaired or systems replaced to put the building into fully serviceable condition to meet current codes. At AISD, the District retained a firm in 2007 to assess all of the facilities in the district and develop cost estimates to make needed repairs. That effort included an assessment of all facilities using architectural and

engineering assessors to identify deficient conditions in the buildings. This survey focused, for the most part, on the condition of the existing buildings and did not initially include educational adequacy or functional equity needs. All of the identified needs were grouped into building systems, and a Uniformat® cost structure supported by RSMeans® nationally-based cost data adjusted to the Austin, Texas area, was employed to develop consistent cost estimates across all schools. These cost estimates, using the industry-standard, line- item costs, comprise the majority of the costs in the AISD facility assessment database and are included in the numerator of the FCI calculation. In addition, ADA (American with Disabilities Act)/TAS (Texas Accessibility Standards) reports were developed to address ADA issues against current guidelines during 2008-09. A functional equity study identified core areas and specialized classroom areas, within specific school campuses that did not meet AISD educational specifications. The cost to resolve these issues has been included in the deficiencies and numerator of the current FCI numbers.

Page 185

EXHIBIT "B"


Educational Adequacy Total

Capacity 1,476,141$

Support for Programs 8,738,417$

Technology 74,371,610$

Security and Supervision 34,273,456$

Instructional Aids 53,308,580$

Learning Environment 3,862,200$

Physical Characteristics 4,715,934$

Relationship of Spaces 4,078,391$

Subtotal 184,824,729$

Educational Adequacy Assessment As part of this master planning effort, AISD conducted an educational adequacy assessment of all schools. An educational adequacy assessment evaluates how well the campus is equipped to deliver the instructional program. During the summer of 2010, a team of assessors went to each school and collected an inventory of each space at the classroom level. This data was then compared to the District developed standards to identify when an individual space did not meet a specific level of compliance. When an item did not meet the standard, the condition was noted and a line item was added to the assessment database with a budget to correct that condition.

This applied a standards-based approach to determine the overall educational adequacy by evaluating eight overall criteria as follows.

Capacity: Ability of the facility to meet the needs of the student population.

Support for Programs: Provision of special spaces or classrooms to support the instructional program.

Technology: Presence of infrastructure, data distribution, and equipment.

Supervision & Security: Extent to which physical configurations help or hinder building operation.

Instructional Aids: Presence of necessary equipment within teaching spaces.

Physical Characteristics: Sizes and shapes of teaching spaces.

Learning Environment: Degree to which learning areas are comfortable, well-lit, odor-free, controllable and quiet.

•

Relationship of Spaces: Proximity of instructional spaces to support areas such as libraries, labs, and lecture halls.

The chart below identifies the educational adequacy deficiency costs by the eight overall criteria. Technology, instructional aids, and security and supervision make up the greatest need in terms of educational adequacy.

Page 186

EXHIBIT "B"


Building Deficiencies The combination of the building condition and the educational adequacy items currently represents over 41,000 line items district-wide. Deficiencies are categorized by the following priorities. Priority 1: currently critical (immediate need, i.e., fire safety systems) Priority 2: potentially critical (to be corrected within one year, i.e., major HVAC equipment, security systems) Priority 3: necessary/not yet critical (1-2 years, i.e., site lighting, sanitation sewer, educational adequacy) Priority 4: recommended (3-5 years, i.e., finishes, educational adequacy) Priority 5: does not meet current code/standards/grandfathered (i.e., functional equity, 3rd tier ADA/TAS) The chart below lists the facility type and the costs associated with correcting priorities 1 through 5. Logically, the greatest need is at the elementary schools since this makes up the largest number of schools and the most square footage in the District.

Renovation Costs by Priority, by Campus

Type Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 5 Total

Schools

PreK Centers 191,332$ 843,430$ 1,221,125$ 154,414$ 9,470$ 2,419,771$

Elementary Schools 36,765,169$ 101,426,669$ 259,226,302$ 30,846,706$ 78,109,545$ 506,374,392$

Middle Schools 19,163,034$ 56,423,338$ 88,591,082$ 17,785,740$ 42,995,421$ 224,958,615$

High Schools 16,483,563$ 69,061,730$ 141,365,127$ 36,842,162$ 22,301,333$ 286,053,916$

Alternative Education 1,342,426$ 3,305,106$ 13,807,291$ 2,473,156$ 136,888$ 21,064,868$

Total Schools 73,945,525$ 231,060,273$ 504,210,927$ 88,102,178$ 143,552,658$ 1,040,871,561$

Other District Facilities

Support Facilities 2,135,310$ 7,374,941$ 6,094,116$ 45,901$ 291,467$ 15,941,735$

Administrative 732,481$ 2,760,465$ 9,054,486$ 363,873$ 202,910$ 13,114,216$

Maintenance and Transp. 637,830$ 880,329$ 3,343,222$ 277,590$ 199,746$ 5,338,716$

Total Other District Facil 3,505,621$ 11,015,735$ 18,491,824$ 687,363$ 694,123$ 34,394,666$

Grand Total 77,451,146$ 242,076,008$ 522,702,751$ 88,789,541$ 144,246,781$ 1,075,266,227$

Page 187

EXHIBIT "B"


The chart below provides a crosstab by building system. The greatest building system deficiency, as is typically the case, is in the area of Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC). Please note that the “Other” building system category includes functional equity and ADA/TAS compliance.

A summary of building system by priority by individual school campus is available in the Facility Summary Reports with Facility Master Plan Recommendations section of this report, pages 38-164.

Districtwide Crosstab by Priority by System

Building System 1 2 3 4 5 Total

Site 498,041$ 3,002,131$ 20,459,959$ 15,715,200$ -$ 39,675,332$

Roofing 1,016,327$ 20,921,438$ 22,268,609$ 4,912,452$ -$ 49,118,826$

Exterior 195,604$ 5,079,548$ 20,391,721$ 3,620,156$ -$ 29,287,028$

Structure 191,655$ 392,439$ 997,978$ 63,077$ -$ 1,645,149$

Interior 126,632$ 6,550,035$ 44,089,416$ 20,438,059$ -$ 71,204,142$

HVAC 12,732,977$ 147,968,144$ 149,987,307$ 1,725,368$ -$ 312,413,796$

Plumbing 16,072,172$ 7,908,635$ 66,458,213$ 3,840,468$ 1,568$ 94,281,056$

Electrical 575,073$ 23,329,696$ 68,672,377$ 5,273,377$ -$ 97,850,523$

Technology -$ 9,936,855$ 77,335,604$ -$ -$ 87,272,458$

Fire and Safety 19,377,531$ 11,607,150$ 1,133,648$ 567,724$ -$ 32,686,053$

Conveyances 223,695$ 5,132,182$ 8,858$ -$ -$ 5,364,736$

Specialties 37,115$ 247,755$ 19,236,791$ 32,633,662$ -$ 52,155,323$

Other 26,404,324$ -$ 31,662,269$ -$ 144,245,213$ 202,311,806$

Total 77,451,146$ 242,076,008$ 522,702,751$ 88,789,541$ 144,246,781$ 1,075,266,227$

Facility Condition Assessment Priority

Page 188

EXHIBIT "B"


Facility Options Using the Educational Framework as guiding principles, the Facility Master Plan Task Force began the complicated task of developing facility options and scenarios in order to meet their charge of developing recommendations to improve facility efficiencies through objective data analysis and community input. The information and data considered included the following. Current condition of buildings (FCI) Educational adequacy of schools Current and proposed instructional programs Current and projected population growth and

decline Lease obligations, current and possible use of

buildings, and administrative facilities The following criteria were used for decision making. Educational enhancement – meet the

educational needs of all students Efficient space utilization – optimum utilization

range was between 85%-105% of permanent capacity

Cost savings – decrease M&O expenses or capital cost avoidance of correcting building deficiencies and building operating costs per student

Community Impact – impact of change versus the gains

Future growth – account for future population

growth/decreases Facility condition – facility condition index rating

Over the course of seven months, 108 options that were developed by the Task Force, consultants, and staff, were reviewed and evaluated by the Task Force. An outline of the 108 options is provided in Appendix G of this report.

Page 189

EXHIBIT "B"

AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT

District-Wide Facility Master Plan

Appendix A FCI White Paper and Facility FCI Charts

Page 190

EXHIBIT "B"

White Paper:

Facility Condition Index (FCI) at Austin ISD

The assessment of school facilities and the development of long-range master plans, is Magellan

Consulting’s core business. District-wide master plans, by their very nature, recommend changes across

a district. In nearly every district in which we work, there are building condition and student capacity

challenges. Often, there exists enough capacity across the district when compared to total student

enrollment; however, that capacity is rarely in the right place. In the last five years, every large urban

district we have worked with has faced considerable loss of enrollment district-wide which eventually

necessitates reducing overall footprint and closing schools. We typically see changes in educational

programs that make the alignment of facilities a challenge, as curriculum and delivery methods are ever-

evolving. Nearly 90 percent of our country’s 21st century schools were designed and constructed in the

20th century, most in the mid 20th century, under an industrial age factory model with a long row of

classrooms down a double-loaded corridor. The condition of schools, with the exception of very

wealthy districts, is declining across the country. The recent economic climate is exacerbates this

problem as maintenance funds are decreasing. Texas the new education funding system in Texas is

placing greater emphasis on the use of Maintenance and Operations (M&O) funds. Unfortunately,

deferred maintenance does not go away with reduced funding, and the unmet need continues to build

until the cost to repair eventually exceeds the cost to replace the facility.

Commonly, communities have a widespread perception that school districts shape, hide, or manipulate

building condition data to obtain a desired result. This perception may even result in a law suit, which

creates the necessity to engage in projects that are driven by legal requirements. While years ago there

may have been school districts that were guilty of these charges, particularly in the era of racial

segregation and the court-ordered desegregation that followed, the fact is that we have not seen data

manipulation at any of the districts in which we have worked for over a decade.

School district administrators and facility staffs continually request that we simplify the data and planning

parameters. The process of engaging the community offers a broad spectrum of individuals who want to

participate. These diverse groups of individuals may speak different languages, have different educational

backgrounds, different levels of school planning experience. Some may have a deep understanding of

mathematics and can easily read charts and graphs, while others will not. The main challenge herein, is

that the amount and type of data used in the planning process is very complex. Depending upon the

issue, capacity can include a variety of factors. Capacity may include only permanent space, or it may

include both permanent and temporary space. Capacity can be adjusted for smaller class sizes, and

utilization can affect capacity when smaller class sizes are required for special needs students. In

addition, the Facility Condition Index FCI may include only current costs, or it may include a forecast of

future system replacements that are going to occur within the next three to five years. Enrollment data

is often complicated by official enrollment, staffing enrollment, average daily membership, and even the

time of year. Although there is often a desire to simplify the information presented, it is not

always possible to do so while maintaining access to the kinds of data that are presented in

the complex planning process. The variables in data mean to the outside individual that numbers

may be different from one context to another. Capacities change from year to year, buildings

deteriorate on a daily basis, and enrollment fluctuates. School planners are always working with a

moving target.

Page 191

EXHIBIT "B"

FCI Campuses

<10%

10-19%

20-29%

30-39%

40-49%

50-59%

60-69%

70-79%

80-89%

90-100%

>100%

Repair

Renovate

Replace

Since 1991, the facility management industry has used an index called the FCI to benchmark the relative

condition of a group of schools. This index simply divides the identified repair costs in a facility by the

total cost to replace the facility. For example, take a 100,000 square foot building that might

theoretically cost $10 million to construct new and now has $1 million

in identified repairs. Dividing $1 million by $10 million results in an

FCI of 10 percent. The National Association of College and University

Business Officers has suggested for college planning that an FCI of less

than 5 percent is good, an FCI between 5 and 10 percent is fair, and an

FCI greater than 10 percent is poor. In K-12 public school planning,

the gulf between 10 percent and 100 percent is just not stratified

enough. For several years, Magellan Consulting has used the chart

displayed to the right, with clients to provide a little more gradation.

We often find district-wide FCI averages in the 20 to 30 percent range.

Schools in the 30 to 60 percent range are probably the most difficult

to plan for long-term. Financial modeling has shown that over a 30-

year period, schools that fall in the 65 percent or greater range are

more cost-effective to replace than to repair. This is due to efficiency

gains with more modern facilities and the value of the building at the

end of the analysis period. Of course, FCI is not the only factor used

to identify buildings that need renovation, replacement or even

closure. Historical significance, enrollment trends, community

sentiment, and the availability of capital are additional factors that are

analyzed when making school facility decision.

The FCI calculation, while seemingly simple, yields a consistent result that can commonly be compared

across districts, as the same factors are almost always considered in deriving the numerator and the

denominator. It should also be noted that there are nuances regarding the process for calculating FCI

that must be understood.

FCI: The Denominator

The denominator is the bottom part of the equation and possibly the easiest with which to start. The

denominator is the theoretical cost to replace the facility. It is important to recognize that this cost is

based on the replacement of a building with another facility that is the same size and is fully

code compliant. If, for example, you are comparing the FCI on a 3,450 square foot gymnasium building

at a campus, the replacement cost is the theoretical cost to replace that same 3,450 square foot

building. For the purpose of FCI, it is not important whether the district actually replaces that building.

Depending on campus type and other factors that might include joint use, the district might decided to

replace the 3,450 building with a 12,000 square foot gymnasium building that would be built to the

district’s current educational specifications and cost considerably more. For the purposes of FCI, we

are trying to establish a benchmark to compare a group of facilities so the repair costs are compared to

the theoretical cost to replace that same facility.

Since the replacement cost comparison is primarily driven by the type of facility (elementary school,

middle school, high school, administration, etc.), a set of cost models have been developed that estimate

the cost per square foot for new construction. The cost models take into account national industry

averages from a recognized industry data source called RSMeans®, adjusted to Austin, Texas, as well as

Page 192

EXHIBIT "B"

the district’s recent experience in the Austin construction market. The costs per square foot are then

multiplied by the size of the school or building under consideration.

“Construction Cost” is a term that may mean different things to different people. To contractors,

construction cost generally means the amount they are paid to construct the building, and that figure

generally does not include a contingency for unforeseen conditions. To the school district facilities staff,

construction cost typically refers to the planning budget to construct the building plus a small

contingency for unforeseen conditions and may also include the cost to bring utilities to a site. To the

school board, construction cost often means the total costs spent on the project which includes the

architects’ fees and the cost to manage the overall construction program. Therefore, it is important to

be careful which costs to include in the replacement cost denominator calculation. For FCI purposes,

we include all of the costs associated with completing the project for the amount of funding that is

required in total. That includes the base construction cost (often referred to as “hard costs”); plus

inflation; plus professional fees; plus administrative costs for testing, surveys, and advertising; plus

management costs; plus contingencies; plus escalation to an estimated mid-point of construction (often

referred to as “soft costs”). These total costs are significantly more than the base construction cost

paid to the contractor. The following table shows the average costs used in determining the

replacement cost for AISD, based on the building type and the buildings’ gross square footage measured

to the outside of exterior walls.

FCI: The Numerator

The numerator is the top part of the equation and is a little more complicated. The numerator is the

estimated cost to complete the repairs on the building in its current condition. This repair cost is

generally considered to be like-for-like repairs. Within reason, the deficient conditions would be

repaired or systems replaced to put the building into fully serviceable condition to meet current codes.

This is where it gets complicated. In determining which costs to include in the repair cost, one has to

consider if the same conditions would be included in the replacement facility. Classroom additions, for

instance, would add square footage to the building. It would not be comparable to include the addition’s

new construction cost portion of the repaired facility to a facility of the same size, unless the square

footage was added to the replacement facility cost estimate. One would not include building needs that

have not yet occurred, also called “projected needs,” as that would be comparing a building’s future

ES MS HS Admin PortableSquare Feet 82,500 170,000 330,000 20,000 1,536 Cost / SqFt 185.54$ 204.20$ 201.53$ 176.65$ 85.97$

Construction Cost 15,306,924.11$ 34,714,158.47$ 66,504,421.68$ 3,532,981.28$ 132,047.22$

A/E Services 1,224,553.93$ 2,777,132.68$ 5,320,353.73$ 317,968.32$ 11,884.25$ Site/Survey 30,613.85$ 69,428.32$ 133,008.84$ 7,065.96$ 264.09$ Permits/Fees 68,881.16$ 156,213.71$ 299,269.90$ 15,898.42$ 198.07$ Testing 114,801.93$ 260,356.19$ 498,783.16$ 26,497.36$ 660.24$ Furn/Fixt/Equip (FF&E) 918,415.45$ 2,082,849.51$ 3,990,265.30$ 141,319.25$ 7,262.60$ Other 612,276.96$ 1,388,566.34$ 2,660,176.87$ 137,654.34$ 6,602.36$

Project Budget 18,276,467$ 41,448,705$ 79,406,279$ 4,179,385$ 158,919$

Program-level contg @ 10% 1,827,647 4,144,871 7,940,628 417,938 15,892 Program Management 1,005,206$ 2,279,679$ 4,367,345$ 229,866$ 8,741$ Escalation - 3 yrs. @ 5% 3,431,999$ 7,783,337$ 14,911,101$ 784,815$ 29,842$

Total Program Cost 24,541,319$ 55,656,592$ 106,625,354$ 5,612,004$ 213,393$

Cost Per Square Feet 297.47$ 327.39$ 323.11$ 280.60$ 138.93$

Page 193

EXHIBIT "B"

state to that of what would be replaced today. Generally, studies or hazardous material costs that might

be encountered even under a demolition scenario would not be included.

At AISD, the district retained a firm in 2006 to assess all of the facilities in the district and develop cost

estimates to make needed repairs. That effort included a walkthrough of all facilities using architects and

engineers to identify deficient conditions in the buildings. This survey focused, for the most part, on the

condition of the existing buildings and did not include educational adequacy or functional equity type

needs (more on that later). All of the identified needs were grouped into building systems, and a

Uniformat® cost structure supported by RSMeans® nationally-based cost data adjusted to the Austin,

Texas area was employed to develop consistent cost estimates across all schools. These cost estimates,

using the industry standard line item costs, comprise the majority of the costs in the AISD facility

assessment database and are included in the numerator of the FCI calculation. The construction cost

value of all of these deficient conditions, prior to adding soft costs for professional fees, contingency, and

escalation total approximately $444.9 million.

However, the facility condition assessment did not focus on what the assessment industry calls

“educational adequacy” items. Where a building assessment focuses on the condition of the building and

what is broken, an educational adequacy assessment focuses on how well the school supports the

instructional mission and looks objectively at what is missing. As part of this master planning effort,

AISD conducted an educational adequacy assessment of all schools. This assessment made use of the

district’s educational specifications, supplemented with information collected during a three-day

workshop that involved numerous staff, principals, and teachers. A set of standards was developed for

each school type, the buildings typically found on the campus, and for each instructional space. These

standards identified in detail the size of the teaching spaces, the number of students in each space,

physical conditions, plumbing requirements, the number of computer outlets and electrical plugs, and

the type of instructional support for each space, in addition to safety and supervision considerations.

During the summer of 2010, a team of assessors went to each school and collected an inventory of each

space at the classroom level. This data was then compared to the previously developed standards to

identify when an individual space did not meet a specific standard. When an item did not meet the

standard, the condition was noted and a line item was added to the assessment database with a budget

to correct that condition. This has resulted in the identification of approximately $184.8 million in

educational adequacy-related deficiencies.

The combination of the building condition and the educational adequacy items currently represents over

41,000 line items district-wide. Base costs must added up to provide a total that is comparable to the

replacement cost total program budgets use as the denominator of the calculation. Again, the design

and construction industry commonly refers to these costs as “soft costs.” The soft costs factoring is

done at a deficiency level, and every deficiency receives a specific cost allocation. The facilities staff of

AISD has conducted a review of recent projects to gain a better understanding of the associated costs

based on a variety of different types of repairs. The district has an established default soft costs factor

that is added to deficiencies of a standard nature. However, air conditioning and mechanical-related

deficiencies are typically done by mechanical contractors that may require additional engineering

requirements. For this reason, a separate model was established for all HVAC/mechanical repairs. For

life safety-related deficiencies, including security cameras and alarms, the costs are primarily equipment

related and do not have requirements for design and engineering so they too have their own model.

The deficiencies noted for ADA repairs were developed under a slightly different cost structure so a

different factor is applied to these items to provide consistent cost estimates at the project level.

Finally, the functional equity needs for additions and new construction on existing campuses have their

Page 194

EXHIBIT "B"

own soft cost model. The following chart shows the percentage factors that are applied to every $100

of estimated repair cost to derive the total repair cost figure used in calculating the FCI.

The total facility condition cost totals approximately $963.1 million after adding soft costs to the costs

for correcting deficient building and ADA conditions and the educational adequacy costs. During the

August work sessions, the need was approximated at $875 million, but at that time it was believed that

the need would eventually be lowered as data was reviewed. The $875 million figure really represented

the total construction cost (hard cost) required to correct current deficiencies. Indeed the comparable

cost has decreased to about $558.4 million; however, the overall total need is now about $1.1 billion,

including functional equity needs at 44 campuses (discussed in more detail below). Since the August

worksession:

1 Deficiencies have been reviewed and, in some cases, modified by AISD facilities staff (part of

ongoing AISD facility management procedures) – decreased cost.

2 Overlapping cost between ADA studies and building condition deficiencies have been addressed

– decreased cost.

3 Overlapping cost between functional equity deficiencies, ADA deficiencies, and building

condition deficiencies have been addressed – decreased cost.

4 Overlapping cost between educational adequacy deficiencies and building condition deficiencies

have been addressed – decreased cost.

5 Location factor that adjusts RSMeans® data to the Austin area has been corrected – decreased

cost.

6 Algorithm that applies the location factor to RSMeans® data has been corrected – decreased

cost.

7 Revised soft cost models have been developed and applied to accurately reflect the total cost

required to correct deficiencies in a potential capital improvement program – increased cost.

Functional equity needs are different from educational adequacy needs. Educational adequacy is an

analysis of the existing conditions to determine if they meet the district’s educational specifications and

to determine which corrections can logically be made to achieve the standards in an existing structure.

Functional equity is an analysis comparing the area allocations for areas within the school to determine if

they meet the current educational specifications based on the target number of students at the school.

This analysis has resulted in the recommendation for additions to expand libraries, gymnasiums,

cafeterias, administration spaces, and classrooms at several locations. These additions constitute new

space and are therefore not included in the calculation of the FCI. A summary of the functional equity

improvements, although not included in the FCI calculation, is included for reference below.

Default HVAC Life Safety ADA EquityCost Basis 100.00$ 100.00$ 100.00$ 100.00$ 100.00$

Construction Cost 138.46$ 138.46$ 103.46$ 196.37$ 196.37$

A/E Services 20.77$ 20.77$ 4.14$ 29.46$ 29.46$ Permits/Fees 0.62$ 0.62$ 0.47$ 0.88$ 0.88$ Testing 0.42$ 0.42$ -$ 0.59$ 0.59$ Other 23.26$ 28.11$ 1.34$ 32.99$ 32.99$

Project Budget 184$ 188$ 109$ 260$ 260$

Program-level contg @ 10% 18 19 11 26 26 Program Management 10$ 10$ 6$ 14$ 14$ Escalation - 3 yrs. @ 5% 34$ 35$ 21$ 49$ 49$

Total Program Cost 246$ 253$ 147$ 350$ 350$

Soft Cost Factor (%) 78% 83% 42% 78% 78%

Page 195

EXHIBIT "B"

Functional Equity Additions / Renovations

School Number and Name Library Gym Cafeteria Admin Classroom Total

009 Anderson HS - 7,558,381 - - 737,651 8,296,032

002 Austin HS 93,707 1,000,768 - 341,590 6,583,925 8,019,990

005 McCallum HS 1,056,715 974,456 - - - 2,031,171

007 Travis HS - 497,614 - - - 497,614

054 Bedichek MS 1,226,494 1,200,183 - 279,273 10,809,492 13,515,442

046 Burnet MS - - 1,121,709 - - 1,121,709

057 Covington MS - - - - 1,256,499 1,256,499

055 Dobie MS - 4,791,499 778,272 - 290,814 5,860,584

051 Martin MS 830,896 1,996,919 - - - 2,827,815

058 Mendez MS - - - - 1,323,155 1,323,155

052 Murchison MS 382,212 - 791,197 252,361 6,564,076 7,989,847

047 O. Henry MS - - 702,568 - 2,492,687 3,195,256

048 Pearce MS - - - - 751,499 751,499

053 Webb MS - - - 703,953 - 703,953

142 Allan ES 756,946 - - - - 756,946

102 Andrews ES 1,197,967 110,786 - - - 1,308,753

149 Barrington ES - 2,377,285 119,095 - - 2,496,380

107 Brentwood ES - 720,110 718,725 - - 1,438,834

109 Brown ES 101,554 2,561,928 - - - 2,663,482

161 Cook ES - 2,949,680 115,402 - - 3,065,082

113 Cunningham ES - 2,543,464 115,402 812,893 - 3,471,759

114 Dawson ES - 913,985 - 284,351 - 1,198,336

154 Doss ES - - - 486,074 - 486,074

116 Govalle ES 847,514 2,460,375 - 177,258 - 3,485,146

117 Gullett ES 1,154,714 482,843 1,442,527 698,414 1,307,276 5,085,774

119 Highland Park ES - 886,289 796,275 - 517,002 2,199,566

155 Hill ES - 2,404,981 135,713 - - 2,540,694

162 Houston ES - 191,106 - - - 191,106

120 Joslin ES 960,146 - 580,704 - - 1,540,850

160 Linder ES 2,901,672 2,331,124 109,863 - 109,863 5,452,522

122 Maplewood ES - - 1,315,585 - 76,858 1,392,443

123 Mathews ES - - - 47,777 2,160,329 2,208,105

150 Norman ES 516,771 - 268,195 670,256 - 1,455,222

151 Pillow ES 1,140,404 - - 979,995 - 2,120,400

130 Pleasant Hill ES - - - 33,697 249,269 282,966

136 St. Elmo ES - 809,200 - - 517,002 1,326,202

127 Sanchez ES - 2,441,910 168,026 - - 2,609,936

139 Sims ES - 717,340 - - - 717,340

158 Sunset Valley ES - 1,955,836 - 101,554 - 2,057,390

140 Travis Heights ES - - - 978,611 - 978,611

166 Williams ES - 1,695,489 - - - 1,695,489

157 Winn ES 2,880,438 2,654,250 839,205 - 124,634 6,498,528

144 Wooten ES - 406,216 - 704,415 - 1,110,631

146 Zilker ES - 2,409,598 - - - 2,409,598

Figures have been adjusted to eliminate overlap between Condition Assessment and ADA Studies

Page 196

EXHIBIT "B"

FCI Results

For AISD, the FCI calculations include the building condition assessment results, the educational

adequacy assessment results, and the type one and two ADA compliance considerations and then

compare them to the cost of replacing the same facility. These FCI figures provide a benchmark that can

be used to consistently compare AISD facilities district-wide. The planning team refers to the FCI to aid

in decision making when a school or building is subject to renovation, when a change in educational

program is contemplated, or when the school is targeted for replacement, consolidation, or closure for

efficiency reasons. It is not the principle driver, but rather a supporting consideration to guide the

district and hopefully prohibit the district from making additional investment into a building that is close

to or has reached the end of its serviceable life. The following chart is a summary of all of the district’s

facilities by FCI. The one school that falls in the 70-79 percent range is Pease Elementary, a historic

location celebrated as the longest operating public school in the state.

FCI Campuses

<10% 18

10-19% 35

20-29% 30

30-39% 31

40-49% 9

50-59% 2

60-69% -

70-79% 1

80-89% -

90-100% -

>100% -

Total 126

Repair

Renovate

Replace

Page 197

EXHIBIT "B"

AISD School/Facility FCI Summary Total minus NC

Priorities 1-5 and Some ADA

No. Campus Name

Grades

Served Age Site Priority 1 Priority 2

Total Priority

1 and 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 5

Total Facility

Condition

Cost

FCI Related

Facility Cost

Total

Replacement

Cost FCI

Functional

Equity

Educational

Adequacy

Elementary Schools

142 Allan Elementary School PK-5 1957 19.5 1,254,683$ 1,688,882$ 2,943,565$ 6,645,881$ 558,919$ 1,074,557$ 11,222,922$ 10,148,366$ 33,497,560$ 30.3% 1,030,588$ 1,511,428$

101 Allison Elementary School PK-6 1955 10.7 173,617$ 1,354,132$ 1,527,749$ 2,450,503$ 210,014$ 10,288$ 4,198,553$ 4,188,265$ 20,556,998$ 20.4% -$ 907,125$

102 Andrews Elementary School PK-5 1962 7.7 573,941$ 2,633,109$ 3,207,050$ 3,502,631$ 190,659$ 1,517,264$ 8,417,604$ 6,737,774$ 21,020,456$ 32.1% 1,453,514$ 1,030,292$

187 Baldwin Elementary School PK-5 2010 0.0 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 0.0% -$ -$

182 Baranoff Elementary School K-5 1999 15.6 197,873$ 531,250$ 729,123$ 1,814,399$ 277,997$ 121,554$ 2,943,072$ 2,821,518$ 25,651,479$ 11.0% -$ 1,069,123$

149 Barrington Elementary School PK-6 1969 12.1 329,948$ 476,461$ 806,409$ 5,220,479$ 311,342$ 2,708,483$ 9,046,714$ 6,338,231$ 29,888,351$ 21.2% 2,688,134$ 1,146,187$

103 Barton Hills Elementary School K-6 1964 9.9 1,022,269$ 236,671$ 1,258,939$ 2,637,192$ 447,186$ 2,391$ 4,345,708$ 4,343,317$ 14,588,847$ 29.8% -$ 439,914$

104 Becker Elementary School PK-5 1936 3.7 1,114,902$ 2,117,554$ 3,232,456$ 3,621,985$ 252,949$ 118,363$ 7,225,752$ 7,107,389$ 18,663,896$ 38.1% -$ 977,746$

105 Blackshear Elementary School PK-5 1903 5.3 188,148$ 2,178,265$ 2,366,412$ 4,202,512$ 796,536$ 58,019$ 7,423,480$ 7,365,461$ 21,038,900$ 35.0% -$ 705,474$

106 Blanton Elementary School PK-5 1964 8.0 642,778$ 1,082,233$ 1,725,011$ 2,850,419$ 230,709$ 59,146$ 4,865,285$ 4,806,139$ 24,561,843$ 19.6% -$ 1,313,917$

185 Blazier Elementary School PK-5 2008 15.4 136,781$ 177,879$ 314,660$ 897,555$ 205,711$ -$ 1,417,926$ 1,417,926$ 27,857,817$ 5.1% -$ 978,883$

170 Boone Elementary School PK-5 1986 12.5 489,966$ 135,370$ 625,336$ 2,854,265$ 348,141$ 318,391$ 4,146,133$ 3,827,742$ 21,920,602$ 17.5% -$ 991,368$

107 Brentwood Elementary School PK-5 1951 16.7 286,613$ 693,809$ 980,422$ 3,381,304$ 190,212$ 1,625,875$ 6,177,813$ 4,551,938$ 19,622,049$ 23.2% 1,622,094$ 973,002$

108 Brooke Elementary School PK-5 1954 5.9 466,533$ 728,683$ 1,195,217$ 2,708,300$ 262,136$ 37,886$ 4,203,538$ 4,165,652$ 16,699,995$ 24.9% -$ 888,465$

109 Brown Elementary School PK-6 1957 10.1 1,580,199$ 1,153,153$ 2,733,352$ 1,909,309$ 635,293$ 2,665,997$ 7,943,951$ 5,277,954$ 18,761,168$ 28.1% 2,663,484$ 801,611$

110 Bryker Woods Elementary School K-6 1939 6.3 189,411$ 1,119,527$ 1,308,938$ 2,979,081$ 348,606$ 44,654$ 4,681,279$ 4,636,625$ 13,901,689$ 33.4% -$ 863,756$

111 Campbell Elementary School PK-5 1992 9.7 311,592$ 379,698$ 691,291$ 3,030,703$ 197,160$ 377,355$ 4,296,509$ 3,919,154$ 18,838,511$ 20.8% -$ 766,024$

173 Casey Elementary School PK-5 1998 17.9 332,832$ 218,621$ 551,453$ 1,280,715$ 2,281,070$ 78,748$ 4,191,986$ 4,113,238$ 24,702,547$ 16.7% -$ 930,563$

112 Casis Elementary School PK-5 1951 14.2 280,022$ 632,024$ 912,046$ 3,096,268$ 731,873$ 60,579$ 4,800,767$ 4,740,187$ 27,288,458$ 17.4% -$ 1,460,287$

184 Clayton Elementary School K-5 2006 16.8 136,427$ 382,446$ 518,872$ 1,142,866$ 215,392$ -$ 1,877,130$ 1,877,130$ 31,551,211$ 5.9% -$ 1,404,862$

161 Cook Elementary School K-5 1974 12.7 847,723$ 3,046,998$ 3,894,721$ 2,836,484$ 275,616$ 3,529,726$ 10,536,548$ 7,006,822$ 25,515,832$ 27.5% 3,472,684$ 1,093,546$

183 Cowan Elementary School PK-5 1999 22.5 441,004$ 282,482$ 723,486$ 1,163,772$ 269,668$ 287,289$ 2,444,215$ 2,156,926$ 23,634,032$ 9.1% -$ 1,007,303$

113 Cunningham Elementary School PK-5 1963 8.8 174,656$ 203,988$ 378,644$ 8,662,602$ 475,256$ 3,523,663$ 13,040,166$ 9,488,259$ 27,695,695$ 34.3% 3,471,761$ 1,336,362$

179 Davis Elementary School PK-5 1993 13.2 375,946$ 245,779$ 621,725$ 4,466,364$ 242,164$ 172,691$ 5,502,944$ 5,330,253$ 22,832,945$ 23.3% -$ 1,062,050$

114 Dawson Elementary School PK-5 1954 8.7 825,023$ 1,788,448$ 2,613,471$ 2,164,807$ 124,053$ 1,374,936$ 6,277,266$ 4,902,331$ 18,054,973$ 27.2% 1,332,942$ 812,429$

154 Doss Elementary School PK-5 1970 9.7 277,493$ 1,753,192$ 2,030,684$ 3,366,419$ 262,383$ 585,467$ 6,244,954$ 5,659,486$ 21,571,372$ 26.2% 548,668$ 867,630$

176 Galindo Elementary School PK-5 1989 10.8 718,525$ 472,173$ 1,190,697$ 1,724,238$ 237,955$ 162,944$ 3,315,834$ 3,152,890$ 27,712,949$ 11.4% -$ 1,255,082$

116 Govalle Elementary School PK-5 1940 8.4 340,133$ 1,139,527$ 1,479,660$ 4,269,803$ 1,386,730$ 3,711,107$ 10,847,299$ 7,136,192$ 23,095,017$ 30.9% 3,614,398$ 935,305$

159 Graham Elementary School PK-5 1972 9.9 776,380$ 3,942,191$ 4,718,571$ 2,175,356$ 462,863$ 145,540$ 7,502,330$ 7,356,790$ 24,196,550$ 30.4% -$ 874,097$

117 Gullett Elementary School K-5 1956 17.9 296,279$ 477,899$ 774,178$ 3,404,040$ 278,491$ 5,578,522$ 10,035,231$ 4,456,709$ 15,275,706$ 29.2% 5,538,153$ 1,100,391$

118 Harris Elementary School PK-5 1955 7.3 168,662$ 462,786$ 631,447$ 3,593,988$ 351,166$ 26,321$ 4,602,922$ 4,576,600$ 21,247,129$ 21.5% -$ 1,301,321$

163 Hart Elementary School PK-5 1998 15.7 440,103$ 429,303$ 869,405$ 1,705,738$ 330,538$ 150,402$ 3,056,083$ 2,905,681$ 28,219,837$ 10.3% -$ 1,071,119$

119 Highland Park Elementary School K-5 1952 6.3 378,590$ 549,487$ 928,077$ 5,117,848$ 220,844$ 2,357,371$ 8,624,139$ 6,266,769$ 20,158,386$ 31.1% 2,314,969$ 1,112,435$

155 Hill Elementary School PK-5 1970 8.9 369,298$ 762,743$ 1,132,041$ 4,753,883$ 395,173$ 2,849,188$ 9,130,285$ 6,281,096$ 23,453,170$ 26.8% 2,816,276$ 921,105$

162 Houston Elementary School PK-5 1976 13.8 347,984$ 5,056,005$ 5,403,989$ 4,782,952$ 313,940$ 513,050$ 11,013,932$ 10,500,882$ 28,771,349$ 36.5% 452,838$ 1,698,239$

178 Jordan Elementary School PK-5 1992 11.5 344,244$ 526,308$ 870,552$ 4,497,788$ 305,917$ 366,415$ 6,040,673$ 5,674,257$ 25,804,974$ 22.0% -$ 1,294,151$

120 Joslin Elementary School PK-5 1954 5.1 365,427$ 1,658,814$ 2,024,241$ 3,828,081$ 489,316$ 1,761,730$ 8,103,367$ 6,341,638$ 15,618,987$ 40.6% 1,726,417$ 905,386$

180 Kiker Elementary School K-5 1992 12.4 465,453$ 285,692$ 751,145$ 3,481,469$ 231,480$ 270,058$ 4,734,153$ 4,464,095$ 27,275,667$ 16.4% -$ 945,244$

172 Kocurek Elementary School PK-5 1986 12.3 276,757$ 739,213$ 1,015,969$ 4,710,718$ 337,850$ 84,409$ 6,148,946$ 6,064,538$ 23,816,680$ 25.5% -$ 1,239,761$

168 Langford Elementary School PK-5 1980 10.7 543,183$ 5,823,122$ 6,366,305$ 2,847,265$ 293,128$ 600,073$ 10,106,772$ 9,506,698$ 28,303,131$ 33.6% -$ 1,519,228$

121 Lee Elementary School K-6 1939 4.8 426,784$ 1,565,236$ 1,992,020$ 3,564,212$ 200,247$ 36,675$ 5,793,153$ 5,756,478$ 13,990,931$ 41.1% -$ 1,268,395$

160 Linder Elementary School PK-5 1972 9.1 170,717$ 1,486,942$ 1,657,659$ 3,064,256$ 373,892$ 5,824,800$ 10,920,607$ 5,095,807$ 25,625,896$ 19.9% 5,754,971$ 876,187$

131 Lucy Read Pre-K School PK 1961 9.9 191,332$ 843,430$ 1,034,762$ 1,221,125$ 154,414$ 9,470$ 2,419,771$ 2,410,301$ 21,971,173$ 11.0% -$ 715,064$

122 Maplewood Elementary School PK-6 1951 6.4 1,630,235$ 367,527$ 1,997,762$ 3,955,287$ 119,540$ 2,005,569$ 8,078,158$ 6,072,588$ 16,243,675$ 37.4% 1,958,007$ 648,571$

123 Mathews Elementary School PK-6 1916 2.3 103,898$ 1,407,923$ 1,511,822$ 2,537,969$ 285,980$ 2,282,922$ 6,618,692$ 4,335,770$ 13,897,228$ 31.2% 2,258,699$ 841,669$

165 McBee Elementary School K-5 1999 10.9 237,524$ 319,343$ 556,867$ 1,036,048$ 242,383$ 57,384$ 1,892,682$ 1,835,298$ 23,236,719$ 7.9% -$ 883,087$

Page 198

EXHIBIT "B"



No. Campus Name

Grades


Total Priority


Total Facility

Condition

Cost

FCI Related

Facility Cost

Total

Replacement

Cost FCI

Functional

Equity

Educational

Adequacy

147 Menchaca Elementary School PK-5 1975 19.8 237,446$ 4,313,709$ 4,551,155$ 2,516,965$ 693,652$ 82,611$ 7,844,383$ 7,761,772$ 21,040,089$ 36.9% -$ 1,093,862$

124 Metz Elementary School PK-5 1993 6.4 245,693$ 2,198,147$ 2,443,840$ 3,224,075$ 239,898$ 213,073$ 6,120,886$ 5,907,813$ 19,328,741$ 30.6% -$ 958,961$

181 Mills Elementary School PK-5 1998 10.7 254,583$ 438,024$ 692,608$ 2,241,637$ 604,743$ 163,005$ 3,701,993$ 3,538,989$ 27,859,900$ 12.7% -$ 1,316,271$

150 Norman Elementary School PK-5 1970 10.2 491,997$ 1,618,873$ 2,110,870$ 3,488,359$ 249,133$ 1,961,658$ 7,810,019$ 5,819,127$ 17,864,592$ 32.6% 1,896,243$ 880,325$

148 Oak Hill Elementary School PK-5 1974 13.7 577,910$ 2,562,750$ 3,140,659$ 5,082,614$ 417,412$ 46,822$ 8,687,508$ 8,640,685$ 25,741,908$ 33.6% -$ 1,650,197$

125 Oak Springs Elementary School PK-5 1958 8.6 436,196$ 1,544,778$ 1,980,974$ 1,913,526$ 218,887$ 30,328$ 4,143,715$ 4,113,386$ 15,839,115$ 26.0% -$ 712,476$

156 Odom Elementary School PK-5 1970 8.6 314,793$ 555,080$ 869,872$ 3,051,516$ 304,204$ 75,095$ 4,300,687$ 4,225,593$ 22,017,089$ 19.2% -$ 783,022$

126 Ortega Elementary School PK-5 1959 7.4 554,133$ 2,585,580$ 3,139,712$ 2,666,838$ 188,616$ 55,295$ 6,050,462$ 5,995,167$ 14,984,780$ 40.0% -$ 794,706$

189 Overton Elementary School PK-5 2007 70.4 129,148$ 222,703$ 351,852$ 812,642$ 285,677$ -$ 1,450,171$ 1,450,171$ 30,773,624$ 4.7% -$ 1,014,803$

171 Palm Elementary School PK-5 1987 13.2 326,618$ 355,630$ 682,248$ 1,716,073$ 302,890$ 156,623$ 2,857,834$ 2,701,211$ 24,438,393$ 11.1% -$ 1,129,509$

143 Patton Elementary School PK-5 1986 24.1 553,125$ 1,351,958$ 1,905,083$ 2,641,513$ 172,467$ 309,114$ 5,028,177$ 4,719,062$ 26,010,525$ 18.1% -$ 969,016$

128 Pease Elementary School K-6 1876 2.8 366,438$ 2,838,820$ 3,205,258$ 4,030,819$ 795,232$ 51,831$ 8,083,139$ 8,031,308$ 10,597,089$ 75.8% -$ 743,252$

129 Pecan Springs Elementary School PK-5 1957 7.6 204,113$ 354,593$ 558,706$ 5,221,971$ 1,542,355$ 90,134$ 7,413,166$ 7,323,032$ 19,694,928$ 37.2% -$ 1,346,708$

190 Perez Elementary School PK-5 2006 28.0 1,206,199$ 216,162$ 1,422,361$ 1,028,182$ 150,809$ -$ 2,601,352$ 2,601,352$ 29,028,065$ 9.0% -$ 1,027,736$

164 Pickle Elementary School PK-5 2001 17.5 267,092$ 283,194$ 550,286$ 1,241,301$ 347,992$ 116,853$ 2,256,432$ 2,139,580$ 37,780,539$ 5.7% -$ 1,225,897$

151 Pillow Elementary School PK-5 1969 10.0 223,451$ 347,521$ 570,972$ 7,437,607$ 293,128$ 2,716,120$ 11,017,828$ 8,301,708$ 19,335,286$ 42.9% 2,695,012$ 1,237,573$

130 Pleasant Hill Elementary School PK-5 1985 10.1 338,974$ 421,776$ 760,750$ 3,408,419$ 101,031$ 473,908$ 4,744,109$ 4,270,200$ 21,837,014$ 19.6% 367,071$ 767,791$

132 Reilly Elementary School PK-5 1954 10.8 397,166$ 785,780$ 1,182,946$ 2,658,687$ 203,051$ 11,517$ 4,056,202$ 4,044,685$ 14,216,116$ 28.5% -$ 623,670$

133 Ridgetop Elementary School PK-5 1939 5.0 165,485$ 1,164,852$ 1,330,337$ 1,527,895$ 899,377$ 22,541$ 3,780,150$ 3,757,609$ 11,956,232$ 31.4% -$ 492,082$

174 Rodriguez Elementary School PK-5 1999 15.0 229,804$ 335,591$ 565,395$ 1,437,448$ 305,732$ 64,181$ 2,372,756$ 2,308,575$ 28,810,020$ 8.0% -$ 1,238,887$

127 Sanchez Elementary School PK-5 1976 9.2 169,463$ 3,527,025$ 3,696,487$ 2,600,313$ 340,250$ 2,934,744$ 9,571,794$ 6,637,050$ 25,069,329$ 26.5% 2,843,511$ 1,158,542$

139 Sims Elementary School PK-5 1956 8.4 929,492$ 624,530$ 1,554,022$ 4,091,216$ 273,990$ 868,224$ 6,787,451$ 5,919,228$ 15,016,609$ 39.4% 837,082$ 928,787$

136 St. Elmo Elementary School PK-5 1960 9.4 516,693$ 681,703$ 1,198,396$ 4,849,681$ 238,602$ 1,342,548$ 7,629,227$ 6,286,679$ 15,255,478$ 41.2% 1,326,203$ 1,045,047$

138 Summitt Elementary School PK-5 1986 14.5 459,077$ 411,250$ 870,328$ 5,355,622$ 258,428$ 177,876$ 6,662,254$ 6,484,378$ 25,777,010$ 25.2% -$ 1,075,677$

158 Sunset Valley Elementary School PK-5 1971 10.4 170,770$ 2,801,633$ 2,972,404$ 5,549,996$ 235,908$ 2,385,867$ 11,144,175$ 8,758,308$ 20,685,803$ 42.3% 2,339,157$ 1,005,839$

140 Travis Heights Elementary School PK-5 1938 3.2 964,451$ 2,480,760$ 3,445,212$ 3,035,427$ 505,213$ 1,545,119$ 8,530,971$ 6,985,852$ 19,096,715$ 36.6% 1,471,609$ 991,804$

141 Walnut Creek Elementary School K-6 1961 11.5 378,361$ 1,157,572$ 1,535,934$ 2,650,418$ 199,636$ 10,090$ 4,396,078$ 4,385,988$ 28,685,677$ 15.3% -$ 1,064,371$

175 Widen Elementary School PK-5 1986 10.7 344,749$ 519,889$ 864,638$ 2,387,370$ 207,421$ 244,825$ 3,704,253$ 3,459,428$ 26,737,543$ 12.9% -$ 1,026,980$

166 Williams Elementary School PK-5 1976 14.0 207,027$ 3,996,735$ 4,203,762$ 3,314,316$ 634,239$ 2,107,462$ 10,259,778$ 8,123,194$ 22,031,262$ 36.9% 2,037,080$ 1,806,830$

157 Winn Elementary School PK-5 1970 10.0 449,115$ 758,666$ 1,207,781$ 2,895,852$ 360,778$ 6,696,886$ 11,161,297$ 4,464,411$ 19,839,796$ 22.5% 6,617,626$ 1,369,856$

152 Wooldridge Elementary School K-5 1969 11.6 681,037$ 1,779,983$ 2,461,020$ 3,258,538$ 345,503$ 3,072$ 6,068,132$ 6,065,060$ 26,329,413$ 23.0% -$ 961,821$

144 Wooten Elementary School PK-5 1955 6.7 1,154,161$ 3,089,669$ 4,243,830$ 6,189,133$ 541,732$ 1,429,495$ 12,404,189$ 10,974,694$ 21,453,872$ 51.2% 1,380,857$ 1,403,037$

145 Zavala Elementary School PK-6 1937 3.4 874,332$ 410,359$ 1,284,691$ 5,062,642$ 414,056$ 19,700$ 6,781,088$ 6,761,389$ 20,624,524$ 32.8% -$ 1,032,634$

146 Zilker Elementary School PK-6 1950 11.8 895,527$ 1,978,488$ 2,874,015$ 6,699,936$ 776,182$ 2,565,129$ 12,915,262$ 10,350,133$ 18,351,848$ 56.4% 2,409,599$ 1,023,970$

Page 199

EXHIBIT "B"



No. Campus Name

Grades


Total Priority


Total Facility

Condition Cost

FCI Related

Facility Cost

Total

Replacement

Cost FCI

Functional

Equity

Educational

Adequacy

Middle Schools

059 Bailey Middle School 6-8 1993 41.3 718,590$ 2,307,324$ 3,025,915$ 4,249,984$ 1,260,797$ 175,348$ 8,712,044$ 8,538,264$ 52,022,435$ 16.4% -$ 2,483,427$

054 Bedichek Middle School 6-8 1972 23.3 6,051,876$ 3,947,712$ 9,999,588$ 4,289,394$ 1,517,014$ 13,820,241$ 29,626,237$ 15,805,996$ 51,604,343$ 30.6% 13,761,948$ 2,467,186$

046 Burnet Middle School 6-8 1961 23.7 696,528$ 7,228,821$ 7,925,349$ 8,242,121$ 1,461,392$ 1,228,083$ 18,856,946$ 17,628,862$ 51,140,088$ 34.5% 1,167,871$ 2,786,054$

057 Covington Middle School 6-8 1986 21.3 961,398$ 3,791,641$ 4,753,039$ 5,457,787$ 679,240$ 1,960,490$ 12,850,556$ 10,890,066$ 58,357,322$ 18.7% 1,633,542$ 2,218,938$

055 Dobie Middle School 6-8 1973 20.2 819,317$ 1,032,156$ 1,851,474$ 3,993,260$ 1,153,996$ 6,327,599$ 13,326,328$ 6,998,729$ 46,067,662$ 15.2% 6,294,500$ 2,605,739$

043 Fulmore Middle School 6-8 1911 9.8 1,675,047$ 7,905,746$ 9,580,793$ 11,125,201$ 1,520,831$ 353,775$ 22,580,600$ 22,226,825$ 54,800,107$ 40.6% -$ 1,873,471$

056 Garcia Middle School 6-8 2008 41.3 341,779$ 375,320$ 717,098$ 1,477,213$ 256,690$ -$ 2,451,001$ 2,451,001$ 52,634,348$ 4.7% -$ 1,785,189$

062 Gorzycki Middle School 6-8 2009 14.2 309,464$ 330,542$ 640,006$ 1,551,469$ 435,269$ -$ 2,626,743$ 2,626,743$ 57,473,012$ 4.6% -$ 1,948,774$

044 Kealing Middle School 6-8 1986 13.2 375,942$ 4,974,961$ 5,350,903$ 5,384,570$ 962,232$ 464,321$ 12,162,026$ 11,697,705$ 62,920,315$ 18.6% -$ 2,797,674$

045 Lamar Middle School 6-8 1955 14.3 868,115$ 2,862,857$ 3,730,973$ 3,240,381$ 1,109,337$ 19,344$ 8,100,034$ 7,963,458$ 41,245,693$ 19.3% -$ 2,294,389$

051 Martin Middle School 6-8 1966 9.9 529,628$ 6,008,583$ 6,538,211$ 4,037,673$ 630,629$ 3,297,183$ 14,503,696$ 11,206,513$ 38,873,997$ 28.8% 3,222,769$ 1,488,156$

058 Mendez Middle School 6-8 1987 20.7 1,080,210$ 4,069,741$ 5,149,951$ 3,162,498$ 903,869$ 1,830,512$ 11,046,831$ 9,216,319$ 61,291,493$ 15.0% 1,701,214$ 2,294,128$

052 Murchison Middle School 6-8 1967 26.2 485,127$ 1,623,549$ 2,108,676$ 5,951,701$ 1,040,012$ 8,153,256$ 17,253,644$ 9,100,388$ 45,706,537$ 19.9% 7,989,851$ 1,754,965$

047 O. Henry Middle School 6-8 1953 13.8 287,063$ 788,273$ 1,075,336$ 4,249,201$ 368,706$ 3,270,833$ 8,964,076$ 5,693,243$ 42,714,090$ 13.3% 3,236,248$ 1,604,680$

061 Paredes Middle School 6-8 2000 78.2 639,397$ 655,597$ 1,294,994$ 2,788,004$ 1,505,034$ 274,674$ 5,862,705$ 5,588,032$ 50,694,496$ 11.0% -$ 3,031,743$

048 Pearce Middle School 6-8 1958 14.8 797,160$ 1,469,168$ 2,266,328$ 3,870,033$ 437,683$ 797,883$ 7,371,927$ 6,574,044$ 43,914,998$ 15.0% 770,887$ 1,421,448$

028 Ann Richards School 6-10 1958 15.3 1,751,415$ 2,490,074$ 4,241,489$ 10,459,899$ 775,306$ 126,188$ 15,602,883$ 15,476,695$ 45,071,376$ 34.3% -$ 1,975,612$

060 Small Middle School 6-8 1999 36.5 354,444$ 1,045,835$ 1,400,279$ 1,980,661$ 354,205$ 162,029$ 3,897,174$ 3,735,145$ 54,088,993$ 6.9% -$ 1,928,150$

053 Webb Middle School 6-8 1961 15.6 420,533$ 3,515,438$ 3,935,971$ 3,080,033$ 1,413,498$ 733,661$ 9,163,164$ 8,429,502$ 42,628,637$ 19.8% 703,954$ 2,101,392$

High Schools

017 Akins High School 9-12 2000 57.7 954,259$ 1,208,558$ 2,162,817$ 3,966,511$ 1,452,488$ 134,171$ 7,715,986$ 7,581,815$ 115,209,011$ 6.6% -$ 4,294,809$

009 Anderson High School 9-12 1973 38.8 883,879$ 7,269,324$ 8,153,203$ 9,335,056$ 1,959,665$ 8,421,936$ 27,869,861$ 27,743,960$ 100,442,692$ 27.6% 8,296,036$ 5,596,292$

002 Austin High School 9-12 1975 44.3 1,821,769$ 8,599,187$ 10,420,955$ 17,067,949$ 4,155,102$ 8,187,414$ 39,831,421$ 31,644,007$ 101,704,101$ 31.1% 8,019,994$ 4,786,572$

013 Bowie High School 9-12 1988 66.0 1,142,743$ 13,619,484$ 14,762,227$ 14,517,730$ 15,147,412$ 884,595$ 45,311,964$ 44,427,369$ 141,414,289$ 31.4% -$ 16,682,721$

008 Crockett High School 9-12 1969 39.5 1,822,148$ 10,610,065$ 12,432,213$ 19,394,213$ 3,011,592$ 186,183$ 35,024,201$ 34,838,018$ 111,743,044$ 31.2% -$ 3,899,330$

019 Eastside Memorial High Schools (EMHSJC) 9-12 1960 27.6 3,510,942$ 12,123,425$ 15,634,366$ 7,266,111$ 650,888$ 213,544$ 23,764,910$ 23,551,366$ 87,276,402$ 27.0% -$ 2,370,779$

015 Garza Independence High School 11-12 1939 3.1 528,781$ 925,712$ 1,454,494$ 1,791,072$ 516,483$ 198,632$ 3,960,682$ 3,762,050$ 17,523,392$ 21.5% -$ 1,160,890$

029 International High School 9-10 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 0.0% -$ -$

014 Johnson (LBJ) High School 9-12 1974 41.4 1,082,734$ 3,932,853$ 5,015,587$ 7,240,361$ 1,922,200$ 96,326$ 14,274,474$ 14,178,148$ 98,621,982$ 14.4% -$ 3,610,445$

004 Lanier High School 9-12 1966 28.5 1,328,937$ 4,526,958$ 5,855,895$ 12,659,556$ 1,639,563$ 176,389$ 20,331,402$ 20,155,013$ 91,315,888$ 22.1% -$ 3,798,556$

018 LASA 9-12 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 0.0% -$ -$

005 McCallum High School 9-12 1953 31.1 1,149,580$ 3,763,557$ 4,913,137$ 10,864,608$ 1,362,340$ 2,583,395$ 19,723,479$ 17,140,084$ 83,866,651$ 20.4% 2,352,452$ 3,347,251$

006 Reagan High School 9-12 1965 31.8 1,208,310$ 865,508$ 2,073,817$ 12,941,528$ 3,120,501$ 348,003$ 18,483,850$ 18,135,847$ 81,643,031$ 22.2% -$ 5,067,540$

007 Travis High School 9-12 1953 34.8 1,049,482$ 1,617,099$ 2,666,581$ 24,320,432$ 1,903,928$ 870,745$ 29,761,687$ 28,890,942$ 95,250,042$ 30.3% 685,951$ 3,901,369$

Other Facilities

852 Clifton Center Alt. Ed. 1977 7.8 255,304$ 1,789,699$ 2,045,003$ 2,557,341$ 752,437$ 36,615$ 5,391,397$ 5,354,782$ 13,110,071$ 40.8% -$ 1,163,512$

012 Ridgeview ALC 6-12 1953 19.8 594,690$ 1,052,657$ 1,647,347$ 7,759,365$ 1,468,980$ 32,018$ 10,907,709$ 10,875,692$ 31,629,925$ 34.4% -$ 843,199$

251 Rosedale School Alt. Ed. 1939 4.9 492,433$ 462,750$ 955,183$ 3,490,585$ 251,739$ 68,255$ 4,765,762$ 4,697,506$ 14,472,614$ 32.5% -$ 777,226$

252 Baker Center 1911 4.8 282,216$ 1,676,261$ 1,958,477$ 1,224,224$ -$ 202,910$ 3,385,610$ 3,182,700$ 18,483,157$ 17.2% -$ -$

951 Burger Athletic Complex 1977 48.1 1,189,463$ 7,099,714$ 8,289,176$ 3,529,618$ 35,546$ 42,012$ 11,896,352$ 11,854,340$ 50,681,646$ 23.4% -$ -$

941 Carruth Administration Center 1991 2.8 180,247$ 903,444$ 1,083,691$ 5,448,615$ 269,285$ -$ 6,801,590$ 6,801,590$ 37,598,528$ 18.1% -$ -$

922 Central Warehouse 1983 18.7 268,665$ 404,270$ 672,935$ 725,905$ -$ 11,195$ 1,410,034$ 1,398,840$ 27,023,496$ 5.2% -$ -$

949 Delco Activity Center 2003 44.1 259,623$ 205,193$ 464,817$ 170,579$ 10,355$ -$ 645,750$ 645,750$ 16,919,044$ 3.8% -$ -$

948 House Park 1936 11.1 137,227$ 70,034$ 207,260$ 730,632$ -$ 157,489$ 1,095,381$ 915,722$ 8,999,133$ 10.2% -$ -$

281 Nelson Field 1963 20.1 422,773$ -$ 422,773$ 1,663,288$ -$ 91,966$ 2,178,027$ 2,086,061$ 16,557,338$ 12.6% -$ -$

959 Nelson Field Bus Terminal 1995 6.6 70,197$ 81,921$ 152,119$ 58,564$ 61,039$ 24,167$ 295,889$ 271,722$ 4,105,030$ 6.6% -$ -$

950 Noack Sports Complex 2004 11.2 126,224$ -$ 126,224$ -$ -$ -$ 126,224$ 126,224$ 906,929$ 13.9% -$ -$

942 Pleasant Hill Annex 1936 2.0 270,019$ 180,761$ 450,779$ 2,381,648$ 94,588$ -$ 2,927,015$ 2,927,015$ 7,228,209$ 40.5% -$ -$

960 Saegert Transportation 1975 10.6 128,439$ 185,122$ 313,561$ 1,456,374$ 172,306$ 28,659$ 1,970,900$ 1,942,241$ 7,983,889$ 24.3% -$ -$

962 Service Center - Building & Grounds 1991 16.7 170,528$ 209,015$ 379,543$ 1,102,379$ 44,245$ 135,726$ 1,661,892$ 1,526,167$ 15,239,037$ 10.0% -$ 15,999$

Total 77,451,146$ 242,076,008$ 319,527,153$ 0 522,702,751$ 88,789,541$ 144,246,781$ 1,075,266,227$ 0 938,928,480$ 4,112,139,818$ 22.8% 130,776,864$ 184,824,729$

Page 200

EXHIBIT "B"



Appendix B Facility Capacity Charts and Population Updates

Page 201

EXHIBIT "B"

LOC Elementary

Permanent

Capacity

2010

Enrollment

% of Perm.

Capacity

by Enroll.

2009-10

Population

% of Perm.

Capacity

by Pop.

Classroom

Count

Special

Rooms

(ES Only)

Average

Students

per

Classroom

Efficiency

Factor

Classroom

Capacity

Café Area

(SF)

4.77 SF per

student

Capacity

based on

Café Size

Café /

Classroom

Gym Area

(SF)

3.41 SF per

student

Capacity

based on

Gym Size

Gym /

Classroom

Library

Area (SF)

3.98 SF per

student

Capacity

based on

Library Size

Library /

Classroom

142 Allan 673 379 56% 357 53% 42 6 22 85% 673 5,483 4.77 1,149 171% 6,160 3.41 1,806 268% 6,704 3.98 1,685 250%

101 Allison 486 543 112% 536 110% 30 4 22 85% 486 3,513 4.77 736 151% 2,972 3.41 871 179% 3,636 3.98 914 188%

102 Andrews 486 717 147% 604 124% 31 5 22 85% 486 3,361 4.77 705 145% 3,192 3.41 936 192% 2,217 3.98 557 115%

187 Baldwin 669 508 76% 488 73% 38 6 22 95% 669 4,507 4.77 945 141% 3,183 3.41 933 140% 3,598 3.98 904 135%

182 Baranoff 794 876 110% 881 111% 44 6 22 95% 794 3,845 4.77 806 102% 2,878 3.41 844 106% 2,850 3.98 716 90%

149 Barrington 556 996 179% 909 163% 41 6 22 85% 655 2,574 4.77 540 82% 2,558 3.41 750 115% 2,642 3.98 664 101%

103 Barton Hills 251 386 154% 184 73% 14 2 22 95% 251 2,707 4.77 567 226% 2,329 3.41 683 272% 2,834 3.98 712 284%

104 Becker 524 208 40% 214 41% 33 5 22 85% 524 3,337 4.77 700 134% 3,403 3.41 998 191% 2,116 3.98 532 102%

105 Blackshear 598 244 41% 255 43% 37 5 22 85% 598 3,117 4.77 653 109% 3,054 3.41 896 150% 2,246 3.98 564 94%

106 Blanton 636 591 93% 667 105% 40 6 22 85% 636 3,052 4.77 640 101% 2,531 3.41 742 117% 2,723 3.98 684 108%

185 Blazier 598 775 130% 827 138% 38 6 22 85% 598 5,258 4.77 1,102 184% 3,203 3.41 939 157% 3,480 3.98 874 146%

170 Boone 752 501 67% 496 66% 42 6 22 95% 752 4,052 4.77 850 113% 2,887 3.41 847 113% 3,384 3.98 850 113%

107 Brentwood 585 495 85% 419 72% 33 5 22 95% 585 2,468 4.77 517 88% 2,447 3.41 718 123% 3,078 3.98 773 132%

108 Brooke 430 439 102% 449 104% 27 4 22 85% 430 2,363 4.77 495 115% 2,328 3.41 683 159% 2,743 3.98 689 160%

109 Brown 468 519 111% 480 103% 29 4 22 85% 468 3,944 4.77 827 177% 2,426 3.41 712 152% 3,139 3.98 789 169%

110 Bryker Woods 272 404 149% 283 104% 16 3 22 95% 272 2,296 4.77 481 177% 2,987 3.41 876 322% 2,307 3.98 580 213%

111 Campbell 524 360 69% 377 72% 33 5 22 85% 524 4,129 4.77 866 165% 3,030 3.41 889 170% 2,777 3.98 698 133%

173 Casey 711 669 94% 652 92% 44 6 22 85% 711 4,425 4.77 928 131% 3,055 3.41 896 126% 2,757 3.98 693 97%

112 Casis 669 825 123% 729 109% 38 6 22 95% 669 3,962 4.77 831 124% 2,588 3.41 759 113% 3,736 3.98 939 140%

184 Clayton 836 867 104% 734 88% 47 7 22 95% 836 4,282 4.77 898 107% 3,025 3.41 887 106% 3,576 3.98 898 107%

161 Cook 561 901 161% 1,173 209% 35 5 22 85% 561 3,242 4.77 680 121% 2,365 3.41 694 124% 3,375 3.98 848 151%

183 Cowan 669 783 117% 678 101% 37 5 22 95% 669 4,060 4.77 851 127% 2,985 3.41 875 131% 2,968 3.98 746 111%

113 Cunningham 627 512 82% 632 101% 35 5 22 95% 627 3,363 4.77 705 112% 2,518 3.41 738 118% 3,091 3.98 777 124%

179 Davis 731 683 93% 675 92% 41 6 22 95% 731 3,995 4.77 837 114% 3,047 3.41 894 122% 2,848 3.98 716 98%

114 Dawson 505 331 66% 279 55% 32 5 22 85% 505 2,470 4.77 518 103% 2,338 3.41 686 136% 2,121 3.98 533 106%

154 Doss 543 768 141% 679 125% 30 4 22 95% 543 4,623 4.77 969 178% 3,027 3.41 888 163% 2,925 3.98 735 135%

176 Galindo 711 704 99% 715 101% 44 6 22 85% 711 4,287 4.77 899 126% 3,041 3.41 892 125% 3,545 3.98 891 125%

116 Govalle 598 415 69% 450 75% 37 5 22 85% 598 3,570 4.77 749 125% 2,301 3.41 675 113% 2,225 3.98 559 93%

159 Graham 598 761 127% 759 127% 38 6 22 85% 598 4,280 4.77 897 150% 3,217 3.41 943 158% 3,068 3.98 771 129%

117 Gullett 418 541 129% 340 81% 24 4 22 95% 418 2,195 4.77 460 110% 2,401 3.41 704 168% 2,434 3.98 612 146%

118 Harris 542 758 140% 793 146% 34 5 22 85% 542 3,408 4.77 714 132% 2,267 3.41 665 123% 2,594 3.98 652 120%

163 Hart 711 898 126% 865 122% 44 6 22 85% 711 3,667 4.77 769 108% 3,040 3.41 892 125% 2,848 3.98 716 101%

119 Highland Park 585 662 113% 567 97% 33 5 22 95% 585 2,469 4.77 518 88% 2,514 3.41 737 126% 1,951 3.98 490 84%

155 Hill 627 732 117% 677 108% 35 5 22 95% 627 2,723 4.77 571 91% 2,456 3.41 720 115% 3,357 3.98 844 135%

162 Houston 692 915 132% 911 132% 43 6 22 85% 692 4,951 4.77 1,038 150% 3,483 3.41 1,021 148% 3,645 3.98 916 132%

178 Jordan 655 833 127% 672 103% 41 6 22 85% 655 4,159 4.77 872 133% 2,997 3.41 879 134% 2,807 3.98 705 108%

120 Joslin 374 363 97% 314 84% 24 4 22 85% 374 3,595 4.77 754 202% 2,375 3.41 696 186% 2,080 3.98 523 140%

180 Kiker 752 933 124% 866 115% 42 6 22 95% 752 3,779 4.77 792 105% 3,211 3.41 942 125% 2,782 3.98 699 93%

172 Kocurek 673 660 98% 676 100% 42 6 22 85% 673 4,292 4.77 900 134% 2,962 3.41 869 129% 3,561 3.98 895 133%

168 Langford 692 834 121% 914 132% 43 6 22 85% 692 2,881 4.77 604 87% 2,579 3.41 756 109% 2,519 3.98 633 91%

121 Lee 418 428 102% 293 70% 24 4 22 95% 418 2,059 4.77 432 103% 2,238 3.41 656 157% 2,647 3.98 665 159%

160 Linder 542 892 164% 906 167% 34 5 22 85% 542 2,738 4.77 574 106% 2,507 3.41 735 136% 2,322 3.98 584 108%

122 Maplewood 355 406 114% 302 85% 20 3 22 95% 355 2,470 4.77 518 146% 2,447 3.41 718 202% 1,941 3.98 488 137%

123 Mathews 397 405 102% 299 75% 23 4 22 95% 397 1,906 4.77 400 101% 2,377 3.41 697 176% 2,278 3.98 572 144%

165 McBee 580 765 132% 1,026 177% 36 5 22 85% 580 5,127 4.77 1,075 185% 3,045 3.41 893 154% 2,852 3.98 717 124%

147 Menchaca 606 686 113% 702 116% 34 5 22 95% 606 3,572 4.77 749 124% 2,501 3.41 734 121% 2,442 3.98 614 101%

124 Metz 542 498 92% 481 89% 34 5 22 85% 542 4,045 4.77 848 156% 3,013 3.41 884 163% 2,816 3.98 708 130%

181 Mills 794 928 117% 860 108% 44 6 22 95% 794 3,759 4.77 788 99% 3,052 3.41 895 113% 2,747 3.98 690 87%

150 Norman 486 333 68% 380 78% 30 4 22 85% 486 2,876 4.77 603 124% 2,259 3.41 662 136% 2,647 3.98 665 137%

148 Oak Hill 773 772 100% 783 101% 43 6 22 95% 773 4,567 4.77 957 124% 3,393 3.41 995 129% 3,330 3.98 837 108%

125 Oak Springs 411 274 67% 336 82% 26 4 22 85% 411 2,086 4.77 437 106% 2,985 3.41 875 213% 2,130 3.98 535 130%

156 Odom 542 658 121% 740 136% 34 5 22 85% 542 2,643 4.77 554 102% 2,421 3.41 710 131% 2,877 3.98 723 133%

126 Ortega 374 296 79% 263 70% 24 4 22 85% 374 2,734 4.77 573 153% 2,323 3.41 681 182% 1,468 3.98 369 99%

189 Overton 617 668 108% 904 146% 39 6 22 85% 617 4,148 4.77 870 141% 7,853 3.41 2,303 373% 3,560 3.98 894 145%

171 Palm 673 606 90% 687 102% 42 6 22 85% 673 4,189 4.77 878 130% 3,075 3.41 902 134% 3,757 3.98 944 140%

143 Patton 773 914 118% 894 116% 43 6 22 95% 773 4,849 4.77 1,017 131% 3,067 3.41 899 116% 3,542 3.98 890 115%

128 Pease 293 256 87% 0 0% 17 3 22 95% 293 1,307 4.77 274 94% 2,995 3.41 878 300% 1,468 3.98 369 126%

129 Pecan Springs 486 532 109% 520 107% 30 4 22 85% 486 3,220 4.77 675 139% 2,412 3.41 707 146% 2,986 3.98 750 154%

190 Perez 598 886 148% 864 144% 37 5 22 85% 598 4,158 4.77 872 146% 3,295 3.41 966 161% 3,467 3.98 871 146%

164 Pickle 617 740 120% 618 100% 39 6 22 85% 617 4,363 4.77 915 148% 9,153 3.41 2,684 435% 2,882 3.98 724 117%

151 Pillow 522 653 125% 617 118% 29 4 22 95% 522 2,761 4.77 579 111% 3,069 3.41 900 172% 2,282 3.98 573 110%

130 Pleasant Hill 524 619 118% 662 126% 33 5 22 85% 524 3,991 4.77 837 160% 3,022 3.41 886 169% 3,546 3.98 891 170%

131 Read Pre-K 393 509 129% 0 0% 23 - 18 95% 393 2,982 4.77 625 159% NA 3.41 NA NA 2,148 3.98 540 137%

132 Reilly 318 296 93% 342 108% 20 3 22 85% 318 2,287 4.77 479 151% 2,398 3.41 703 221% 1,637 3.98 411 129%

133 Ridgetop 206 219 106% 123 60% 13 2 22 85% 206 2,309 4.77 484 235% 2,336 3.41 685 333% 1,762 3.98 443 215%

Classroom Capacity

Cafeteria = 4,200 SF / 880 Students

4.77 SF per Student

Gym = 3,000 SF / 880 Students

3.41 SF per Student

Library = 3,500 SF / 880 Students

3.98 SF per Student

AISD Permanent Capacity

11/11/2010 Page 202

EXHIBIT "B"

174 Rodriguez 711 910 128% 1,044 147% 44 6 22 85% 711 3,714 4.77 779 110% 3,056 3.41 896 126% 2,818 3.98 708 100%

127 Sanchez 580 585 101% 564 97% 36 5 22 85% 580 2,959 4.77 620 107% 2,399 3.41 704 121% 3,028 3.98 761 131%

139 Sims 355 277 78% 366 103% 22 3 22 85% 355 2,599 4.77 545 153% 2,484 3.41 728 205% 2,625 3.98 660 186%

136 St. Elmo 411 304 74% 407 99% 26 4 22 85% 411 2,825 4.77 592 144% 2,259 3.41 662 161% 3,149 3.98 791 192%

138 Summitt 731 854 117% 572 78% 41 6 22 95% 731 3,683 4.77 772 106% 3,064 3.41 898 123% 4,017 3.98 1,009 138%

158 Sunset Valley 561 451 80% 494 88% 35 5 22 85% 561 2,987 4.77 626 112% 2,376 3.41 697 124% 2,952 3.98 742 132%

140 Travis Heights 486 537 110% 556 114% 31 5 22 85% 486 2,992 4.77 627 129% 2,812 3.41 825 170% 1,962 3.98 493 101%

141 Walnut Creek 655 916 140% 918 140% 41 6 22 85% 655 4,721 4.77 990 151% 2,638 3.41 773 118% 3,706 3.98 931 142%

175 Widen 673 769 114% 834 124% 42 6 22 85% 673 3,851 4.77 807 120% 3,051 3.41 895 133% 3,363 3.98 845 126%

166 Williams 561 642 114% 728 130% 35 5 22 85% 561 3,040 4.77 637 114% 2,500 3.41 733 131% 2,923 3.98 734 131%

157 Winn 524 463 88% 601 115% 33 5 22 85% 524 2,565 4.77 538 103% 2,322 3.41 681 130% 2,348 3.98 590 113%

152 Wooldridge 524 878 168% 1,096 209% 33 5 22 85% 524 4,120 4.77 864 165% 2,580 3.41 757 145% 2,319 3.98 583 111%

144 Wooten 468 695 149% 740 158% 29 4 22 85% 468 3,534 4.77 741 158% 2,534 3.41 743 159% 3,036 3.98 763 163%

145 Zavala 580 407 70% 339 58% 36 5 22 85% 580 2,618 4.77 549 95% 2,740 3.41 804 139% 2,714 3.98 682 118%

146 Zilker 460 522 114% 329 72% 26 4 22 95% 460 2,894 4.77 607 132% 2,217 3.41 650 141% 2,703 3.98 679 148%

44,905 48,738 47,366

LOC Middle

Permanent

Capacity

2010

Enrollment

% of Perm.

Capacity

by Enroll.

2009-10

Population

% of Perm.

Capacity

by Pop.

Classroom

Count

Special

Rooms

(ES Only)

Average

Students

per

Classroom

Efficiency

Factor

Classroom

Capacity

Café Area

(SF)

4.10 SF per

student

Capacity

based on

Café Size

Café /

Classroom

Gym Area

(SF)

12.18 SF

per

student

Capacity

based on

Gym Size

Gym /

Classroom

Library

Area (SF)

4.36 SF per

student

Capacity

based on

Library Size

Library /

Classroom

59 Bailey 1,176 1,041 89% 997 85% 56 0 28 75% 1,176 4,752 4.10 1,159 99% 13,668 12.18 1,122 95% 4,013 4.36 920 78%

54 Bedichek 941 1,054 112% 1,171 124% 48 0 28 70% 941 6,348 4.10 1,548 165% 11,555 12.18 949 101% 3,657 4.36 839 89%

46 Burnet 1,039 998 96% 1,163 112% 53 0 28 70% 1,039 5,765 4.10 1,406 135% 11,877 12.18 975 94% 3,243 4.36 744 72%

57 Covington 1,125 805 72% 922 82% 63 0 28 75% 1,323 4,461 4.10 1,088 82% 13,935 12.18 1,144 86% 4,044 4.36 928 70%

55 Dobie 902 630 70% 709 79% 46 0 28 70% 902 4,790 4.10 1,168 130% 11,388 12.18 935 104% 3,553 4.36 815 90%

43 Fulmore 1,078 995 92% 898 83% 55 0 28 70% 1,078 5,452 4.10 1,330 123% 13,196 12.18 1,083 101% 4,127 4.36 947 88%

56 Garcia 1,215 658 54% 801 66% 62 0 28 70% 1,215 5,220 4.10 1,273 105% 15,986 12.18 1,312 108% 4,666 4.36 1,070 88%

62 Gorzycki 1,323 963 73% 943 71% 63 0 28 75% 1,323 4,669 4.10 1,139 86% 15,396 12.18 1,264 96% 5,616 4.36 1,288 97%

44 Kealing 1,333 1,233 93% 563 42% 80 0 28 70% 1,568 4,433 4.10 1,081 69% 12,344 12.18 1,013 65% 4,499 4.36 1,032 66%

45 Lamar 1,008 604 60% 554 55% 48 0 28 75% 1,008 6,725 4.10 1,640 163% 10,575 12.18 868 86% 3,665 4.36 841 83%

51 Martin 804 639 80% 1,070 133% 41 0 28 70% 804 4,022 4.10 981 122% 11,740 12.18 964 120% 2,983 4.36 684 85%

58 Mendez 1,215 890 73% 1,224 101% 62 0 28 70% 1,215 4,501 4.10 1,098 90% 13,699 12.18 1,125 93% 4,044 4.36 928 76%

52 Murchison 1,113 1,281 115% 1,187 107% 53 0 28 75% 1,113 4,879 4.10 1,190 107% 11,857 12.18 974 87% 3,413 4.36 783 70%

47 O. Henry 945 1,026 109% 764 81% 45 0 28 75% 945 5,199 4.10 1,268 134% 10,628 12.18 873 92% 3,147 4.36 722 76%

61 Paredes 1,156 930 80% 1,123 97% 59 0 28 70% 1,156 5,953 4.10 1,452 126% 12,775 12.18 1,049 91% 2,798 4.36 642 55%

48 Pearce 1,078 329 31% 683 63% 55 0 28 70% 1,078 5,057 4.10 1,234 114% 13,147 12.18 1,079 100% 4,293 4.36 985 91%

28 Richards YWL 924 528 57% 0 0% 44 0 28 75% 924 5,272 4.10 1,286 139% 11,751 12.18 965 104% 5,046 4.36 1,157 125%

60 Small 1,239 959 77% 873 70% 59 0 28 75% 1,239 6,244 4.10 1,523 123% 13,899 12.18 1,141 92% 3,142 4.36 721 58%

53 Webb 804 591 74% 692 86% 41 0 28 70% 804 4,348 4.10 1,061 132% 12,023 12.18 987 123% 4,399 4.36 1,009 126%

20,417 16,154 16,337

LOC High

Permanent

Capacity

2010

Enrollment

% of Perm.

Capacity

by Enroll.

2009-10

Population

% of Perm.

Capacity

by Pop.

Classroom

Count

Special

Rooms

(ES Only)

Average

Students

per

Classroom

Efficiency

Factor

Classroom

Capacity

Café Area

(SF)

3.75 SF per

student

School

Capacity

based on

Café Size

Café /

Classroom

Gym Area

(SF)

8.63 SF per

student

School

Capacity

based on

Gym Size

Gym /

Classroom

Library

Area (SF)

3.50 SF per

student

School

Capacity

based on

Library Size

Library /

Classroom

17 Akins 2,394 2,720 114% 3,076 128% 114 0 28 75% 2,394 10,935 3.75 2,916 122% 21,471 8.63 2,488 104% 8,371 3.50 2,392 100%

9 Anderson 2,017 2,089 104% 1,912 95% 113 0 28 75% 2,373 8,178 3.75 2,181 92% 17,068 8.63 1,978 83% 9,864 3.50 2,818 119%

2 Austin 2,205 2,337 106% 1,964 89% 105 0 28 75% 2,205 10,074 3.75 2,686 122% 17,488 8.63 2,026 92% 5,977 3.50 1,708 77%

13 Bowie 2,535 2,876 113% 2,594 102% 142 0 28 75% 2,982 9,200 3.75 2,453 82% 22,036 8.63 2,553 86% 9,862 3.50 2,818 94%

8 Crockett 2,163 1,686 78% 1,927 89% 103 0 28 75% 2,163 8,955 3.75 2,388 110% 17,050 8.63 1,976 91% 7,671 3.50 2,192 101%

19/20/29

EMHSJC /

International 1,548 894 58% 1,310 85% 79 0 28 70% 1,548 8,952 3.75 2,387 154% 16,419 8.63 1,903 123% 6,106 3.50 1,745 113%

15 Garza 321 260 81% 0 0% 18 0 28 75% 378 1,834 3.75 489 129% 2,282 8.63 264 70% 1,223 3.50 349 92%

4 Lanier 1,627 1,624 100% 2,037 125% 83 0 28 70% 1,627 13,513 3.75 3,603 221% 23,465 8.63 2,719 167% 7,677 3.50 2,194 135%

14/18 LBJ / LASA 1,842 1,881 102% 1,110 60% 94 0 28 70% 1,842 8,026 3.75 2,140 116% 18,936 8.63 2,194 119% 8,856 3.50 2,530 137%

5 McCallum 1,596 1,824 114% 1,343 84% 76 0 28 75% 1,596 6,244 3.75 1,665 104% 15,765 8.63 1,827 114% 6,981 3.50 1,994 125%

6 Reagan 1,588 901 57% 1,597 101% 81 0 28 70% 1,588 8,600 3.75 2,293 144% 22,180 8.63 2,570 162% 6,226 3.50 1,779 112%

7 Travis 1,862 1,420 76% 1,994 107% 95 0 28 70% 1,862 9,462 3.75 2,523 136% 14,870 8.63 1,723 93% 7,017 3.50 2,005 108%

21,698 20,512 20,864

Classroom Capacity

Cafeteria = 9,000 SF / 2,400 Students

3.75 SF per Student

Gym = 20,720 SF / 2,400 Students

8.63 SF per Student

Library = 8,400 SF / 2,400 Students

3.50 SF per Student

Classroom Capacity

Cafeteria = 4,500 SF / 1,100 Students

4.10 SF per Student

Gym = 13,400 SF / 1,100 Students

12.18 SF per Student

Library = 4,800 SF / 1,100 Students

4.36 SF per Student

AISD Permanent Capacity

11/11/2010 Page 203

EXHIBIT "B"

LOC Elementary

Permanent

Capacity

2010

Enrollment

% of Perm.

Capacity

by Enroll.

2010-11

Population

% of Perm.

Capacity

by Pop.

142 Allan 673 379 56% 354 53%

101 Allison 486 543 112% 585 120%

102 Andrews 486 717 147% 692 142%

187 Baldwin 669 508 76% 557 83%

182 Baranoff 794 876 110% 891 112%

149 Barrington 556 996 179% 955 172%

103 Barton Hills 251 386 154% 203 81%

104 Becker 524 208 40% 226 43%

105 Blackshear 598 244 41% 288 48%

106 Blanton 636 591 93% 630 99%

185 Blazier 598 775 130% 896 150%

170 Boone 752 501 67% 478 64%

107 Brentwood 585 495 85% 456 78%

108 Brooke 430 439 102% 441 103%

109 Brown 468 519 111% 525 112%

110 Bryker Woods 272 404 149% 312 115%

111 Campbell 524 360 69% 367 70%

173 Casey 711 669 94% 763 107%

112 Casis 669 825 123% 731 109%

184 Clayton 836 867 104% 837 100%

161 Cook 561 901 161% 1,252 223%

183 Cowan 669 783 117% 707 106%

113 Cunningham 627 512 82% 573 91%

179 Davis 731 683 93% 666 91%

114 Dawson 505 331 66% 276 55%

154 Doss 543 768 141% 728 134%

176 Galindo 711 704 99% 689 97%

116 Govalle 598 415 69% 452 76%

159 Graham 598 761 127% 825 138%

117 Gullett 418 541 129% 325 78%

118 Harris 542 758 140% 755 139%

163 Hart 711 898 126% 888 125%

119 Highland Park 585 662 113% 599 102%

155 Hill 627 732 117% 714 114%

162 Houston 692 915 132% 897 130%

178 Jordan 655 833 127% 706 108%

120 Joslin 374 363 97% 329 88%

180 Kiker 752 933 124% 883 117%

172 Kocurek 673 660 98% 687 102%

168 Langford 692 834 121% 895 129%

121 Lee 418 428 102% 308 74%

160 Linder 542 892 164% 956 176%

122 Maplewood 355 406 114% 300 84%

123 Mathews 397 405 102% 284 72%

2010 Population Update

01/26/2011 Page 204

EXHIBIT "B"

165 McBee 580 765 132% 1,031 178%

147 Menchaca 606 686 113% 685 113%

124 Metz 542 498 92% 477 88%

181 Mills 794 928 117% 831 105%

150 Norman 486 333 68% 376 77%

148 Oak Hill 773 772 100% 820 106%

125 Oak Springs 411 274 67% 293 71%

156 Odom 542 658 121% 706 130%

126 Ortega 374 296 79% 266 71%

189 Overton 617 668 108% 948 154%

171 Palm 673 606 90% 637 95%

143 Patton 773 914 118% 908 117%

128 Pease 293 256 87% 0 0%

129 Pecan Springs 486 532 109% 490 101%

190 Perez 598 886 148% 945 158%

164 Pickle 617 740 120% 737 119%

151 Pillow 522 653 125% 651 125%

130 Pleasant Hill 524 619 118% 631 121%

131 Read Pre-K 393 509 129% 0 0%

132 Reilly 318 296 93% 357 112%

133 Ridgetop 206 219 106% 128 62%

174 Rodriguez 711 910 128% 1,045 147%

127 Sanchez 580 585 101% 584 101%

139 Sims 355 277 78% 343 97%

136 St. Elmo 411 304 74% 369 90%

138 Summitt 731 854 117% 623 85%

158 Sunset Valley 561 451 80% 483 86%

140 Travis Heights 486 537 110% 548 113%

141 Walnut Creek 655 916 140% 936 143%

175 Widen 673 769 114% 794 118%

166 Williams 561 642 114% 640 114%

157 Winn 524 463 88% 485 93%

152 Wooldridge 524 878 168% 1,160 222%

144 Wooten 468 695 149% 672 144%

145 Zavala 580 407 70% 347 60%

146 Zilker 460 522 114% 338 74%

44,905 48,738 48,165


01/26/2011 Page 205

EXHIBIT "B"

LOC Middle

Permanent

Capacity

2010

Enrollment

% of Perm.

Capacity

by Enroll.

2010-11

Population

% of Perm.

Capacity

by Pop.

59 Bailey 1,176 1,041 89% 979 83%

54 Bedichek 941 1,054 112% 1,219 130%

46 Burnet 1,039 998 96% 1,170 113%

57 Covington 1,125 805 72% 905 80%

55 Dobie 902 630 70% 719 80%

43 Fulmore 1,078 995 92% 850 79%

56 Garcia 1,215 658 54% 829 68%

62 Gorzycki 1,323 963 73% 989 75%

44 Kealing 1,333 1,233 93% 541 41%

45 Lamar 1,008 604 60% 583 58%

51 Martin 804 639 80% 1,056 131%

58 Mendez 1,215 890 73% 1,266 104%

52 Murchison 1,113 1,281 115% 1,171 105%

47 O. Henry 945 1,026 109% 804 85%

61 Paredes 1,156 930 80% 1,165 101%

48 Pearce 1,078 329 31% 712 66%

28 Richards YWL 924 528 57% 0 0%

60 Small 1,239 959 77% 876 71%

53 Webb 804 591 74% 731 91%

20,417 16,154 16,565

LOC High

Permanent

Capacity

2010

Enrollment

% of Perm.

Capacity

by Enroll.

2010-11

Population

% of Perm.

Capacity

by Pop.

17 Akins 2,394 2,720 114% 3,092 129%

9 Anderson 2,017 2,089 104% 1,962 97%

2 Austin 2,205 2,337 106% 1,958 89%

13 Bowie 2,535 2,876 113% 2,606 103%

8 Crockett 2,163 1,686 78% 1,883 87%

19/20/29

EMHSJC /

International 1,548 894 58% 1,249 81%

15 Garza 321 260 81% 0 0%

4 Lanier 1,627 1,624 100% 1,981 122%

14/18 LBJ / LASA 1,842 1,881 102% 1,083 59%

5 McCallum 1,596 1,824 114% 1,316 82%

6 Reagan 1,588 901 57% 1,552 98%

7 Travis 1,862 1,420 76% 1,902 102%

21,698 20,512 20,584


01/26/2011 Page 206

EXHIBIT "B"



Appendix C Visioning Workshop Summary

Page 207

EXHIBIT "B"

AUSTIN ISDFacility Master Plan

Visioning Workshop

May 13 & 14, 2010

Page 208

EXHIBIT "B"

Acknowledgements Cuningham Group Architecture P.A., as a consultant to DeJONG-RICHTER, prepared this document with the support and assistance of the following Facility Master Plan Vision Workshop participants: John Alawneh AISD - Technology Tony Arnold City of Austin – Parks & Recreation John Blazier Business Partner Kathrin Brewer Austin Partners in Education Bill Caritij AISD - Chief Accountability Meria Carstarphen AISD - Superintendent Nan Clayton Former AISD Board Member Ariel Cloud AISD – Asst. Superintendent Elementary Nicole Conley-Abram AISD - CFO Tommy Cowan Business Partner Paul Cruz Chief of Schools Ashton Cumberbatch Community Seton Hospital Elizabeth Dickey AISD Special Education Bill De Dufour AISD - Technology Richard Frazier AISD – Teacher / Task Force Chair Janna Griffin Asst. Supt. Office - Elementary Janis Guerrero AISD – Community Relations Bergeron Harris AISD – Asst. Supt. Middle Schools Janna Lilly AISD – Special Education Viviana Lopez AISD – Curriculum/Special Projects Eliza May Community Janet Mitchell Community – Task Force Chair Chris Moore City of Austin – Child Safety Jaqui Porter Early Childhood Geronimo Rodriguez Community – Seton Hospital Curt Shaw Director of Construction Management Karen Sperry AISD – Chief of Staff Paul Turner AISD – Executive Director of Facilities Gloria Williams AISD – Community Education Cora Wright City of Austin – Parks & Recreation Other Participants

Pat Rossett Carolyn Staskiewicz

AISD – Assistant Director Bond Services DeJONG-RICHTER

Eric Sheppard Magellan Inc Steven Kapeller BLGY Architecture Benny Hawkins BLGY Architecture Meg Parsons Cuningham Group Architecture, P.A. Tim Dufault Cuningham Group Architecture, P.A.

Page 209

EXHIBIT "B"

AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Table of Contents

Introduction

Day One A. Greatest Hopes B. Provocation I: Sir Ken Robinson C. Issues & Assets

D. Provocation II: School of One E. I See…We See… F. Facility Master Plan Vision Statement G. Provocation III: Environment Matters H. Values: AISD Strategic Plan 2010-2015 Review I. Story Time

Day Two

A. Reflections B. Provocation III: John A. Johnson C. Facility Principles

Appendices A. Day One Presentation

B. Day Two Presentation C. Final Presentation D. Photos

Page 210

EXHIBIT "B"

Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Introduction

This document is the result of a Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop held May 13th & 14th, 2010 with participants from the Austin Independent School District and the community. The purpose of this workshop was to create a Facility Master Plan Vision Statement and Facility Principles. The purpose of a Facility Master Plan is to create a clear and compelling vision of the future for AISD, aligning facilities with learning. A Facility Master Plan Vision Statement creates a filter by which future decisions can be made and Facility Principles create overarching ideas about what‟s important for all schools in AISD. The process used during the Visioning Workshop was interactive and included “Provocations” and small and whole group work. The following is a summary of our work during both days.

Page 211

EXHIBIT "B"


Greatest Hopes: Day one started with participants sharing their Greatest Hopes for the Facility Master Planning process. Below are some of the hopes shared by participants:

Page 212

EXHIBIT "B"


Provocation I: Sir Ken Robinson: Do Schools Kill Creativity? http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/ken_robinson_says_schools_kill_creativity.html

Reactions to the video included the following:

Learning occurs in many ways – public education focuses on academic achievement

Career/Vocational Education is not emphasized but some children want – we need to provide the right programs for all children

The system is structurally set up to fail some children – there are ethnocentric, gender, and cultural differences we need to consider

Everyone learns differently

Focus on where students can be successful through application

Plan for the future but not at the expense of today

There is a knowing/doing gap in education – establish the courage to do what we know is right – “thou shalt” …accountability

We continue to build boxes for people to teach in that look the same – we need more flexible, collaborative spaces

We need to respond to changes in the world; we need to be agile and our environment affects us

The challenge is that we have given critical responsibility to one group of adults: teachers; we need to consider the role of parents and the community to create creative thinkers. Open possibilities for kids to learn from and in whole world – engage the community

Page 213

EXHIBIT "B"

http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/ken_robinson_says_schools_kill_creativity.html


Issues & Assets We discussed and prioritized Issues and Assets in Austin ISD. This was a way to find out what was important to those present and what they thought were key to the success of a Facilities Master Plan. As is noted below on the sheets the key issues identified were:

Equity of facilities and resources across the district

Efficient use of resources throughout the community

Partnering

Future flexibility for teaching in the future

Competition and school choices (Middle class participates in public schools but they have other choices)

School boundaries

Page 214

EXHIBIT "B"


Provocation II: School of One http://schools.nyc.gov/community/innovation/SchoolofOne/default.htm

The group watched a video on the School of One, a program that started the summer of 2009, in New York City. From the above website: “The mission of School of One is to provide students with personalized, effective, and dynamic classroom instruction so that teachers have more time to focus on the quality of their instruction. To achieve this mission, School of One re-imagines the traditional classroom model. Instead of one teacher and 25-30 students in a classroom, each student participates in multiple instructional modalities, including a combination of teacher-led instruction, one-on-one tutoring, independent learning, and work with virtual tutors. To organize this type of learning, each student receives a unique daily schedule based on his or her academic strengths and needs. As a result, students within the same school or even the same classroom can receive profoundly different instruction as each student‟s schedule is tailored to the skills they need and the ways they best learn. Teachers acquire data about student achievement each day and then adapt their live instructional lessons accordingly By leveraging technology to play a more essential role in planning instruction, teachers have more time to focus on doing what they do best - delivering quality instruction and ensuring that all students learn.”

Page 215

EXHIBIT "B"

http://schools.nyc.gov/community/innovation/SchoolofOne/default.htm


Activity I: I See…We See… “Vision is the art of seeing the invisible” Jonathan Swift To start the visioning process we asked participants to „imagine it‟s 10 years out, the AISD Facility Master Plan has given the district amazing learning places that reflect the community and help the district accomplish its mission. People visit because its facilities are so successful in accomplishing the goals of the District. Imagine you‟re giving someone a tour – what do you see?‟ Individually participants created I See statements:

One-on-one time with teachers

Entire staff focused and engaged with kids

Teachers focused on teaching the kids and not other issues

Schools are the pride of the community and the first choice of middle class families

Large yet flexible spaces built to fit our growing population

Repurposed spaces that are vintage yet functional for the community

All facilities are beautifully maintained and are supportive of the instructional programs

All schools are painted in bright colors – place of exciting learning

A dramatically reduced number of schools, yet a mix of small, medium, and large facilities

50 years later the space is still current (or can be)

Public and private, city and school district co-location of offices, classrooms, theaters, and meeting areas

Art facilities which involve all our students and the world class Austin arts community in a learning partnership

Shared facilities with the city Zachary Scott Theater, Long Center, AT&T, IBM, CAN. ACC – classroom days around and within the city

Students integrated within the community, downtown, capitol, tech companies, Whole Foods; “what do you do days”

Students a large part of the day as interns and apprentices

Schools have clear feeder patterns and each feeder pattern has a special focus

Engaged, enthusiastic students that want to be there. Eager to explain their love for learning.

Loud sounds from playing and team problems solving

Quiet places for reading and silent learning contemplation

Team sports, yoga, and meditation

Wall-sized white boards for drawing ideas and solutions (graffiti on buildings)

Integrated learning (curriculum) across multiple learning environments

Teachers focused on each child‟s learning style and developing and delivering in small groups to that style on a fundamental goal

Subjects based on student career goals

Teams of students involved in projects using technology

Students in a variety of “work spaces “ to complete team projects

Teachers facilitating the learning for students with technology as a major focus

Fifteen-to eighteen-hour campuses that engage all ages of the community from senior populations to immigrant populations teaching each other, weekend festivals, performing arts with the community

Partnerships with the community, government and schools to achieve educational goals

Schools that are useable by the community – computers, gymnasiums, weight room

Teachers adept at teaching with technology, smart boards that are interactive, advanced projection systems with students to share their work

Computer-directed programs that include collaboration and relationships

Furniture that is moveable and easily configured to adapt to a lesson

Wall space for student work display

Work space for problem solving – environmental issues

Students interacting with each other and the instructor in a well lit, clean, environmentally comfortable space

Recreational and athletic facilities that are available in all communities resulting from partnerships with public and private entities that support youth and adult education

Page 216

EXHIBIT "B"


Schools that welcome visitors and are responsive to visitors

Classrooms that are interactive include technology but also instructionally interactive – kids engaged with each other and teacher

All students have internet access at home

Staff, students and parents can readily access results and academic plans

Students have exactly the information they need in the best format

Realization of the promise of “instructional TV” to help teachers with complex, real world concepts such velocity, acceleration, gravity, history of Middle Eastern areas, areas on curves, environmental science, poetry etc…

Virtual lab for HS students to work on course credits. Teachers as side facilitators.

As I walk through the facility I see a number of distant learning centers where students and teachers participating in a collaborative learning process. These rooms have state of the art technology.

State of the art facilities on each campus and two district-wide performing art centers

Students attend neighborhood schools as best opportunity

Classroom instruction that accommodates different student learning styles and provides support and enrichment based on student learning needs

Stimulating and inviting learning environments that are fun to be in

Inviting/welcoming face to the facility

Parents working with students throughout the school

Spaces for collaboration between teachers, parents and students

Parents present, actively engaged, knowing learning goals of students

Space for community/parents to be engaged

Outside area is an extension of the learning environment

Students learning in flexible indoor and outdoor spaces

Gardens, fountains and trails instead of carpet and grass

Active learning

Classrooms that make use of indoor and outdoor settings for learning

Students moving and active in the learning process

Students actively engaged in their learning

Classrooms which comfortably hold 30 students in a variety of ways

Students working in small groups collaboratively

I see building design geared towards multi-sensory student engagement

A clean, well maintained visually appealing school for every student

Tables instead of desks

Classrooms are organized into learning centers

Apprenticeships for vocational education

Learners engaged in community activities and project learning

Government classes sponsor a bill/resolution at the capital

Spaces for volunteers from collaborative agencies

Libraries that allow students to access the world beyond their classroom

Community of instructors…local, expert, university, etc…

Space for group performances in every school

Culturally relevant artwork and displays

Technology is natural (organic part of the learning process

Facilities and technology and resources accessible for all

Classrooms where students have access to technology and its use is integrated into all areas

Students skilled at technology for gaining, sharing, linking, creating information

Multiple technology resources in every classroom

Science and math labs which allow for technology and hands on activities

I Pad technology instead of paper

Learning spaces for teachers and administrators

Adequate work space for all staff

Multi use meeting spaces

Less office space – more multi-purpose spaces

All space is special education space based on IEP (Individual Education Plan) for every child

Page 217

EXHIBIT "B"


Social skills training as part the degree program (such as mediation training)

Flex schedules for students in high school

Young children given the time and opportunity to learn through play

Access to all resources within a school for every student

Curriculum that is differentiated to fit individuals needs and flexible schedules to allow the best use of time

Secondary classrooms that allow for small group work (not just rows of chairs)

A flower bed at the entrance of school, there are trees that have been pruned, and doors have been painted recently and rooms are brightly painted, there are posters on the walls along with student work. The facilities reflect attention to detail

As we enter the library, there is a bank of computers and students working in small groups accessing databases from around the world. The students are engaged and the noise level is amazingly semi quiet.

Technology driven learning in every classroom in AISD facility

Language development academy, producing fluent 2nd and 3rd language proficiency

Fine arts integrated with academics integrated with social learning

Music academy generating music professionals, singers, etc.

Spaces that are student/teacher friendly

Teachers interacting with students

Community advocate centers/service for students and family members

Learning centers for 0 to 4-year olds

All students actively involved in learning

Collaboration between AISD and ACC that produces HS graduates interested in graduation with certificates in medical technology, nursing, construction, etc…

Central headquarters reduced in physical size, in more compact, effective structure

Substantial revenue generated from space use that can be reinvested into important programming

Private and corporate donation to AISD foundation in excess of $50 million

Number-one rated HS in the country in Austin due to technology or live music/jazz, band or other with an awesome facility/stages, media rooms, etc…

I See Wordle www.wordle.net

Wordle is a program that generates “word clouds” from text. The clouds give greater prominence to words that appear more frequently in the source text. The Wordle to the left was generated from all the I See statements

contributed by participants

Page 218

EXHIBIT "B"

http://www.wordle.net/


In small groups participants then shared these I See… statements and created We See… statements. Listed below are the We see… statements worked on by participants in small groups. These became the basis of the Vision Statement. We see…..

An overall environment that is both encouraging and engaging Purposeful, functional, modular facilities that serve all students needs Facilities “co-purposed” for student and community usage Teachers totally focused on education and innovation

Students in a variety of learning environments with technology support, integrated to ensure development of individual learning styles and goals, supported by community partnerships on an ongoing basis (24/7) Facilities that are inviting, welcoming, flexible enough to accommodate and support a variety of instructional arrangements and incorporates:

instructional technology

family and community access to information

teacher access to information and resources

Facilities with dedicated spaces to foster and engage parents/community Facilities that use the outdoors and indoors in ways that are environmentally responsible and

allows for learning to take place in a variety of ways Facilities that engage with the community to provide extended learning opportunities both within

the school walls and beyond Classrooms large enough to allow for flex grouping and active hands-on learning A variety of multi-use areas Facilities where technology is integrated in every space and accessible to all students and staff Spaces that allow for differentiated instruction and flexible school day

Environment: small group instruction spaces, flower beds, natural light, storage areas and no portable buildings (beautiful physical space high quality learning is norm) Special Programs: Single gender/ single-grade academies, partnerships with higher learning for career/vocational skill development, family resource centers, fine arts, language academies and early childhood centers Technology: Virtual/distance learning, IPad/electronic text-books Central Office: More compact space Revenue: Space used (for partnerships, co-locations in underutilized space) Private and corporate gifts – Austin-based celebrities

Page 219

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 220

EXHIBIT "B"


Facility Master Plan Vision Statement

The purpose of a vision statement is to guide the entire process, help set priorities, align resources against priorities and facilitate an efficient decision making process. The following vision statement was created by participants from the work done together:

All AISD schools inspire high student achievement and common community goals through inviting, accessible, and efficient facilities that integrate technology and sustainability. Revised Version:

All AISD schools will inspire high student achievement

and support common community goals through equitable,

inviting facilities that integrate technology and are

optimally used, accessible, sustainable, and meet highest

educational adequacy standards.

Page 221

EXHIBIT "B"


14

Provocation III: Environment Matters “The only true voyage of discovery consists not of visiting new places, but seeing with new eyes.” Voltaire As a part of the process of thinking about the future of Austin schools, the group looked at learning styles, the learning environment and current examples of what other districts are doing with their facilities. Below are examples of what was discussed. The presentation is included in the May 13th presentation in the appendix of this document.

Page 222

EXHIBIT "B"


Values Building on the work that has already been done in the District we reviewed the Austin ISD Strategic Plan and expanded on the Values contained in the Plan: AISD Strategic Plan 2010-2015:

Mission (What We Do) In partnership with parents and our community, AISD exists to provide a comprehensive educational experience that is high quality, challenging, and inspires all students to make a positive contribution to society. Vision (Where We Want to Be) AISD will be nationally recognized as an outstanding school district, instilling a passion for life-long learning in all students. Goals (What We Want to Accomplish)

Goal 1: All students will perform at or above grade level.

Goal 2: Achievement gaps among all student groups will be eliminated.

Goal 3: All students will graduate ready for college, career, and life in a globally competitive economy.

Goal 4: All schools will meet or exceed state accouintability standards, and the district will meet federal standards and exceed state standards.

Strategies (How We Will Achieve Our Goals)

Provide a high-quality, well-rounded educational experience to all students that is rigorous, culturally relevant, healthful, and engaging.

Build strong relationships with students, families, and the community to increase trust and shared responsibility.

Ensure that every classroom has a high-quality, effective educator, supported by high-quality, effective administrators and support staff.

Align resources to accomplish priorities within a balanced budget.

Values (What We Believe In)

Focus on Children

Excellence

Integrity

Equity

Respect

Health and Safety

Page 223

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 224

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 225

EXHIBIT "B"


Story Time As a way to think more about how learning will happen in the future and what role the facilities play, participants were asked to work in small groups and answer the following question:

Imagine it is 2020 and AISD has met its strategic plan goals for 2015 and has addressed many of the key facility needs as defined in the Facility Master Plan of 2010. Imagine you are (a student, a community member, a teacher, a staff member) Describe your typical day in an AISD school – what does your day look like? 1. What are you doing? What is the process of learning and what are the outcomes or expectations? 2. Who are you with? How is your day organized? 3. What is your environment like? Where are you and how do you feel? 4. What makes AISD a special place to learn?

Page 226

EXHIBIT "B"


Day Two: Reflections While Day One was about creating a Facility Master Plan Vision Statement, Day Two of the workshop was about creating Facility Principles. Facility Principles create overarching ideas about what‟s important for all schools in AISD. To start off Day Two the group reflected on Day One and on a video assigned as homework: Dave Eggers‟ Wish: Once Upon a School. http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/dave_eggers_makes_his_ted_prize_wish_once_upon_a_school.html

Page 227

EXHIBIT "B"

http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/dave_eggers_makes_his_ted_prize_wish_once_upon_a_school.html


Provocation IV: John A. Johnson From the KnowledgeWorks website: http://www.kwfdn.org/resource_library/_resources/sacc_video_guide.asp

"Schools as Centers of Community: John A. Johnson Achievement Plus Elementary School” is a video case study and discussion guide that assists local leaders and residents in creating constructive, meaningful dialogue on the importance of good school design and ways schools can become centers of their communities. KnowledgeWorks Foundation partnered with the American Architectural Foundation to create the guide and video. Video link: http://www.archfoundation.org/aaf/gsbd/Videos.SCC.htm

Page 228

EXHIBIT "B"

http://www.kwfdn.org/resource_library/_resources/sacc_video_guide.asp

http://www.archfoundation.org/aaf/gsbd/Videos.SCC.htm


Facility Principles Starting with the Austin ISD 2010-2015 Strategic Plan Strategies, participants worked in small groups to define Facility Principles. Facility Principles are overarching ideas about what‟s important for all schools in the Austin Independent School District. For each of the Strategies groups defined what this meant for facilities. So, for example, if the Austin ISD is committed to an engaging/healthy experience for all students, this means what in terms of facilities.

Page 229

EXHIBIT "B"


Facility Principles The Austin Independent School District is committed to An engaging/healthy experience for all students … This means…

• All schools will have a space identified to engage parents and be responsive to student needs (learning/language/cultural/socioeconomic)

• All schools will have spaces dedicated to active learning and diverse learning styles

• All schools will be equipped to provide technology resources in classrooms and other learning areas

• Create and maintain clean and attractive grounds that encourage physical activities

• Provide safe entry and exit for cyclists, walkers, skateboarders, etc.

• Develop spaces that promote social and recreational interaction

• Common areas for active, hands-on group activities

• Coordinate and cooperate with other entities (YMCA, YWCA, Parks & Recreation) to share and/or build new facilities (pools, gyms, parks)

• All schools will have good indoor air quality, climate control, and day-lighting

• Our facilities will support high quality, rigorous, well rounded learning

Page 230

EXHIBIT "B"


Facility Principles The Austin Independent School District is committed to Strong relationships with students/families/community … This means…

• Community hubs for services and programs

• Flexible spaces and hours to accommodate changes in learning styles, instructional delivery supported by technological resources for students, families and communities

• Facilities to provide learning spaces that support student collaboration, teamwork and relationship building

Page 231

EXHIBIT "B"


Facility Principles The Austin Independent School District is committed to Supporting and engaging high quality effective staff … This means…

• AISD facility decisions promote long-term value

• AISD facilities should be equitable and adequate across the district

• AISD staff and community must have input into facility decisions to ensure adequate resources (examples: space, storage, technology, outlets)

• AISD facilities to provide high quality professional development spaces

• AISD facilities must provide an appropriate environment for staff effectiveness (example: HVAC, light, acoustics, security)

• AISD facilities must include adequate, flexible-use core facilities (library, gym, cafeteria)

• AISD staff must have appropriate access to various spaces to meet student needs of a high quality rigorous educational experience

Page 232

EXHIBIT "B"


Facility Principles The Austin Independent School District is committed to Aligning resources with priorities… This means…

• Leverage Austin public and private resources for more effective and efficient use of existing and new facilities by:

• Revisit efficiency study

• Align decisions with fiscal impact statement

• “CAN” concept (Community Action Network) to engage various public entities (e.g. UT, ACC, Travis County, Seton, St. David‟s, etc…) for purpose of repurposing facilities including charters and co-location

• Must at least break even or generate revenue

• Strategy for maintenance and operations to support facilities and address deferred, routine, and preventative maintenance

• Develop detailed capital plan schedule/report that includes budget/actuals/completion dates and M & O impact by project

• CAN concept must be integrated into bond planning process to address shared facilities and a more comprehensive set of services

• Develop strategic partnerships to obtain private donations /endowments in excess of $50 million

Page 233

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 234

EXHIBIT "B"


Appendices

Contained on the following pages are the presentations from both days.

Page 235

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 236

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 237

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 238

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 239

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 240

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 241

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 242

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 243

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 244

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 245

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 246

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 247

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 248

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 249

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 250

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 251

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 252

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 253

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 254

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 255

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 256

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 257

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 258

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 259

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 260

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 261

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 262

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 263

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 264

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 265

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 266

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 267

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 268

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 269

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 270

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 271

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 272

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 273

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 274

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 275

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 276

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 277

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 278

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 279

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 280

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 281

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 282

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 283

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 284

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 285

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 286

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 287

EXHIBIT "B"


Photos taken during the Workshop

Page 288

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 289

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 290

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 291

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 292

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 293

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 294

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 295

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 296

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 297

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 298

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 299

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 300

EXHIBIT "B"


Page 301

EXHIBIT "B"



Appendices D, E, and F Appendix D: Community Dialogue #1 Results

Appendix E: Community Dialogue #2 Results

Appendix F: Community Meeting #3 Results

Due to the volume of these reports, see the following link to access this information:

http://rcpt.yousendit.com/1042147173/d50a3fb54a75365c932c5df95adbd0c4

Page 302

EXHIBIT "B"

http://rcpt.yousendit.com/1042147173/d50a3fb54a75365c932c5df95adbd0c4



Appendix G Summary of Facility Options Discussed by the FMPTF

Page 303

EXHIBIT "B"

Facility Master Plan Task Force - Summary of Options

0.1Cut all bus service for magnet schools and signature programs $1,994,516

0.2Redraw boundaries for the entire district with the greatest weight on vertical alignment Unknown Unknown $0

0.4

Move International HS from Eastside HS to ALC. Relocate ALC students to Blackshear ES. Move Blachsear ES students to Zavala ES Unknown $0 $0

0.5

Repurpose Allan ES as a Pre-K thru 8 and move Allison ES attendance area middle school students from Martin MS to Allan Pre-K-8 Unknown $0 $0

0.6

Repurpose Blackshear ES to a Pre-K - 8 school, and Oak Springs ES as a Pre-K - 6th, move middle school students from these attendance zones from Kealing MS Unknown $0 $0

0.7

Repurpose Campbell ES as a Pre-K -8th school and move middle school students from Kealing MS to Campbell Pre-K-8th Unknown $0 $0

0.8

Repurpose Brentwood ES as a Pre-K-6th school, move sixth grade students in this attendance zone from Lamar MS to Brentwood PreK-6 School Unknown $0 $0

0.9Repurpose Zavala ES to a Pre-K-8th school and move middle school students from Martin MS to the new school Unknown $0 $0

0.10

Add a sixth grade class to Metz ES, Govalle ES, Ortega ES, Norman ES, and Sims ES, move sixth grade students from Martin MS and Garcia MS. Unknown $0 $0

0.11

Assuming all changes in options 0.5 through 0.10 are made, repurpose Martin MS as adminstrative center. Move remaining Martin students to Kealing MS. Remove magnet program from Kealing MS. Move 500 students to Lamar MS and 300 students to Covington MS. Move middle schol population of Cowan ES from Covington MS to Bailey MS. Unknown $0 $0

0.13Reassign portion of students from Small MS to Gorzycki MS $0 $0 $0

0.14

Purchase shopping center with adequate space for all district adminstrative functions and a movie theater for a Performing Arts Center. Sell CAC and discontinue all leases. Rent the PAC when not in use. $0

0.15Charge a fee for general transfers, reducing fee for low-income families Unknown $0 $0

0.16Move the media center and professional library services together with PDC for better utilization of resources Unknown TBD TBD

0.17 Build three new elementary schools - Undesignated $0 $0 $79,700,000

NOTE: Highlighted options were presented at the Community Meetings held on January 12 & 13, 2011

DescriptionOption M&O SavingsCost Avoidance

Future Bond Impact

Page 304

EXHIBIT "B"




Future Bond Impact

0.18Build a new middle school - Southeast (land funded from previous bond) $0 $0 $55,700,000

0.19Build a new high school - South (land funded from previous bond) $0 $0 $106,600,000

0.20 School for Young Men

0.21Global option to remove 6th grade from all elementary schools when room is available in middle schools

1.1Consolidate Reilly ES and Ridgetop ES at a new school built on the Reilly ES site $2,076,204 $7,734,391 $24,000,000

1.2 Reassign students from Brown ES to Reilly ES $0 $0 $0

2.1Move a portion of student population from Cowan ES to Boone ES ($72,607) $0 $0

2.2Close Joslin ES and move students to Sunset Valley ES and Boone ES $1,259,273 $8,466,116 $0

2.2AClose Joslin ES and move students to Sunset Valley ES. Move a portion of Sunset Valley ES students to Boone ES $1,259,273 $8,466,116 $0

2.2 B

Close Joslin ES and move students to Sunset Valley ES. Move a portion of Sunset Valley ES students to Boone ES and Cunningham ES. Adjust boundaries between Cowan ES and Boone ES. $1,266,595 $8,466,116 $0

2.2 C

Close Joslin ES and move students to Sunset Valley ES. Move a portion of Sunset Valley ES students to Boone ES and Cunningham ES. $1,266,595 $8,466,116 $0

2.2 D

Close Joslin ES and move students to Sunset Valley ES. Move a portion of Sunset Valley ES students to Boone ES and Cunningham ES. $1,276,967 $8,466,116 $0

2.3Adjust boundaries between Mills ES, Patton ES, and Boone ES ($59,185) $0 $0

2.4Adjust boundaries between Williams ES and Cunningham ES ($2,241) $0 $0

2.5 Adjust boundaries between Odom ES and St Elmo ES $0 $0 $0

3.1Close Oak Springs ES and Zavala ES and consolidate into Blackshear ES and Govalle ES $2,369,043 $10,681,507 $0

3.2Close Allan ES and move students into Govalle ES and Norman ES $1,257,574 $11,546,218 $0

3.2B

Close Allan ES and repurpose as an administrative building. Move student population to Govalle ES and Norman ES, adjust boundaries of Oak Springs ES, Zavala ES, Brooke ES and Ortega ES $1,257,574 $0 $0

3.3

Close Zavala ES and Brooke ES move students into a new elementary school. Close Allan ES and move students into Govalle ES, Norman ES, and Ortega ES $3,843,266 $23,479,180 $28,100,000

Page 305

EXHIBIT "B"




Future Bond Impact

3.4 Adjust boundaries for Maplewood ES and Campbell ES $0 $0 $0

3.5Close Oak Springs ES and Ortega ES and consolidate students into Blackshear ES, Sims ES, and Norman ES $2,300,842 $10,308,022 $0

3.6 Close Pease ES $712,296 $7,302,501 $0

3.7Close Govalle ES and Oak Springs ES and move students to Allan ES, Zavala ES, and Blackshear ES $2,510,507 $16,136,129 $0

3.8Repurpose Blackshear ES as a Hutson-Tillotson demonstration school, training site for future teachers $0 $0 $0

3.9 A

Close Brooke ES and move students to Allan ES and Zavala ES. Adjust boundary between Allan ES and Norman ES. $1,301,382 $5,477,387 $0

3.9 B1 Close Ortega ES and move students to Govalle ES. $1,153,873 $6,082,090 $0

3.9 B2Close Oak Springs ES and move students to Blackshear ES. $1,146,969 $4,225,932 $0

3.9 C

Close Sanchez ES and move students north of Town Lake to Zavala ES and Metz ES. Adjust boundaries between Zavala ES and Linder ES. Build a new 800-student elementary south of Town Lake to receive students from Sanchez ES, Metz ES and Travis Heights ES. $1,556,924 $9,424,688

* included in Option 0.17

3.12

Close Allan ES and repurpose as a middle school for Young Men, repurpose Martin MS as a middle school for Young Women. Reassign Allan ES students to Govalle ES, Ortega ES and Norman ES $12,203 $0 $15,389,258

3.13Close Govalle ES and reassign students to Ortega ES, Oak Springs ES and Allan ES $1,363,538 $11,910,197 $0

3.14Close Blackshear ES and reassign students to Oak Springs ES and Zavala ES $984,538 $7,291,599 $0

3.16

Close Govalle ES and reassign students to Brooke ES, Ortega ES and Oak Springs ES. Close Allan ES and reassign students to Brooke ES and Norman ES. Adjust boundaries between Brooke ES and Zavala ES. $2,873,104 $23,456,415 $0

4.1A Close Dawson ES and move students to Becker ES $1,422,157 $6,110,749 $0

4.1BClose Becker ES and move student population to Dawson ES $1,422,157 $7,036,234 $0

4.2Close Becker ES, Barton Hills ES, and Zilker ES and consolidate into new elementary school $3,282,691 $24,580,169 $28,100,000

4.3Adjust boundaries between Becker ES, Dawson ES, Travis Heights ES, and Linder ES ($80,539) $0 $0

4.4AClose Barton Hills ES and Becker ES and move students into Zilker ES and Dawson ES $2,201,810 $11,930,384 $0

Page 306

EXHIBIT "B"




Future Bond Impact

4.4BClose Barton Hills ES and Zilker ES and move students to Becker ES and Dawson ES. $2,266,637 $17,543,935 $0

4.5Close Barton Hills ES and Becker ES and move students into Zilker ES and Dawson ES $2,207,301 $11,930,384 $0

4.6Close Barton Hills ES and Joslin ES and move students into Zilker ES and Dawson ES $2,367,541 $13,360,266 $0

4.7Close Barton Hills ES and reassign students to Zilker ES and close Becker ES and reassgin students to Dawson ES $2,207,301 $11,930,384 $0

4.8Reassign a portion of Linder ES to Travis Heights ES and reassign a portion of Travis Heights ES to Becker ES $0 $0 $0

5.1Do not accept transfers into Bryker Woods ES, Casis ES, Gullett ES, and Highland Park ES $0 $0 $0

5.2Discontinue the option to offer 6th grade at Bryker Woods ES $0 $0 $0

5.3Adjust boundaries between Bryker Woods ES, Gullett ES, and Brentwood ES $0 $0 $0

5.4Build new school and adjust boundaries for Highland Park ES, Doss ES, and Hill ES $0 $0 $25,200,000

5.5 Adjust boundaries between Mathews ES and Casis ES $0 $0 $0

6.1Adjust boundaries between Norman ES, Overton ES, and Ortega ES ($1,220) $0 $0

6.3Add Pre-K center to Winn ES to provide relief for Andrews ES, Pecan Springs ES, Jordan ES and Overton ES Unknown $0 $0

7.1

Move Kealing MS magnet program to Martin MS. Move student population of Martin MS into Kealing MS with remaining neighborhood students ($186,096) $0 $0

7.2Reassign O. Henry MS/Austin HS students to Martin MS/Eastside HS $0 $0 $0

7.3 Reassign Martin MS students to Fulmore MS $0 $0 $07.4 Create new K-8 schools at Martin MS and Allan ES $0 $0 $0

8.1Close Webb MS and reassign students into Pearce MS, Dobie MS, and Lamar MS $1,865,782 $11,454,070 $0

8.2A

Close Pearce MS and reassign student population into Garcia MS, Webb MS and Lamar MS. Reassign a portion of Webb MS students to Dobie MS $1,881,140 $7,443,511 $0

8.2B

Close Pearce MS and reassign student population into Garcia and Webb MS. Reassign a portion of Webb students to Dobie. Improve vertical alignment for Webb students $1,881,140 $7,443,511 $0

8.3

Close ALC and move students to Webb MS. Reassign Webb MS students to Dobie MS, Lamar MS, and Pearce MS $1,567,984 $12,262,155 $0

Page 307

EXHIBIT "B"




Future Bond Impact

8.4Close Webb MS and repurpose school as a School for Young Men ($98,844) $0 $0

9.1Reassign a portion of Bedichek MS population to Covington MS ($28,677) $0 $0

9.2Adjust boundary between Bedichek MS and Covington MS ($234,298) $0 $0

10.1 Adjust boundary between Reagan HS and McCallum HS $0 $0 $0

10.2

Improve programming at Reagan HS by providing cross-training and mentoring with McCallum staff. Provide nurturing environment to draw students back into Reagan HS. $0 $0 $0

10.3

Give Reagan HS students the option to attend specialized signature programs at McCallum HS with transportation provided. $0 $0

10.4 Close Eastside HS and consolidate into Reagan HS ($539,373) $0 $0

10.5Close Reagan HS and CAC, repurpose Reagan HS as administrative center $0 $0 $0

10.6Close Reagan HS and repurpose as Junior College / ACC Partner $0 $0 $0

11.1Identify surplus portables and build new elementary school in the next bond $0 $0 $0

11.2Repurpose Langford ES as a Pre-K center and adjust boundaries with adjacent schools $0 $0 $0

12.1

Close Dobie MS and repurpose as elementary school to provide relief for Hart ES, Graham ES, Walnut Creek ES and Barrington ES. Reassign Dobie MS students to Webb MS and Pearce MS ($437,477) $0 $0

12.2Discontinue 6th grade at Barrington ES and Walnut Creek ES $0 $0 $0

12.3Adjust boundaries between Wooten ES and Brentwood ES $0 $0 $0

12.4

Assign the remaining 2008 undesignated elementary school to north central Austin (in addition to 2004 Bond Program ES) $0 $0

included in 2008 bond

program

12.5Build a new elementary school in north central Austin (in addition to 2004 Bond Program ES) $0 $0 $28,100,000

12.6

Close Dobie MS and repurpose as an elementary school, reassign students to Webb MS. Adjust boundaries between Webb MS and Pearce MS. Move a portion of student population from Graham ES and Hart ES to new Dobie Elementary. Adjust boundaries between Graham ES and Walnut Creek ES and between Hart ES and Barrington ES TBD $0 $1,056,778

Page 308

EXHIBIT "B"




Future Bond Impact

12.7

Repurpose Garcia MS as a 4 - 8 school and reassign a portion of the population (Sims ES and Norman ES attendance areas) to Pearce MS. Reassign Overton ES and Jordan ES 4 - 5 grade to new Garcia 4 - 8.

13.1Adjust boundaries between Maplewood ES and Campbell ES $0 $0 $0

13.2Build new elementary school in Mueller to relieve overcrowding at Andrews ES, Harris ES, and Blanton ES ($58,093) $0 $24,000,000

13.3 Adjust boundaries between Andrews ES and Winn ES ($84,811) $0 $0

13.4Build a Pre-K center to relieve Andrews ES, Winn ES, Blanton ES, Pecan Springs ES, and Blanton ES $0 $0 $21,600,000

14.1 Build a new school west of Clayton ES $0 $0 $25,200,000

14.2Adjust boundaries between Mills ES, Kiker ES, Cowan ES, and Boone ES ($6,120) $0 $0

14.3 Add a K-8th grade school in southwest area Unknown $0

14.4 Adjust boundaries between Clayton ES and Baldwin ES $0 $0 $014.5 Repurpose Boone ES as a PK - 8 school $0 $0 $0

15.1

Repurpose Casey ES as a Pre-K Center and adjust boundaries between Williams ES, Menchaca ES, Casey ES, Odom ES, and Pleasant Hill ES $0 $0 $0

15.2

Build Pre-K center in the Williams ES attendance zone to relieve Williams ES, Casey ES, Menchaca ES, Odom ES, and Pleasant Hill ES $0 $0 $21,600,000

16.1Create a career center and add a magnet program to Crockett HS to attract students Unknown

16.2 Adjust boundaries between Akins HS and Crockett HS $0 $0 $0

17.1Adjust boundaries between Murchison MS, Burnet MS, Dobie MS, and Webb MS ($191,587) $0 $0

17.2

Move middle school population of Lee ES, Campbell ES, and Maplewood ES attendance zones to Lamar MS. Create more room at Kealing MS to expand program and increase diversity ($73,218) $0 $0

17.3Add a fine arts focus to Lamar MS to attract students and increase enrollment Unknown $0 $0

17.4 Close either Pearce MS or Webb MS Unknown $0 $0

17.5Create a sixth grade center with students from Webb MS, Pearce MS, Dobie MS, Garcia MS. $0 $0 Unknown

Page 309

EXHIBIT "B"

Date post:	27-Dec-2014
Category:	Documents
Upload:	kutnews
View:	84 times
Download:	4 times

Recommended 10-Year Facility Master Plan 3.28.11

Documents