+ All Categories
Home > Documents > RECOMMENDED PROFILES RACKS · Maximize the density: o Use specification executed in Tundra 1U...

RECOMMENDED PROFILES RACKS · Maximize the density: o Use specification executed in Tundra 1U...

Date post: 24-Aug-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
12
Transcript
Page 1: RECOMMENDED PROFILES RACKS · Maximize the density: o Use specification executed in Tundra 1U server with 3 busbars to support 100+ nodes per rack. Cost Effective Easier (and cheaper)
Page 2: RECOMMENDED PROFILES RACKS · Maximize the density: o Use specification executed in Tundra 1U server with 3 busbars to support 100+ nodes per rack. Cost Effective Easier (and cheaper)

R E C O M M E N D E D P R O F I L E S F O R N E X T G E N E R A T I O N O C P R A C K SAlex Lin/Sr. Technical Product Manager/ Penguin Computing

Page 3: RECOMMENDED PROFILES RACKS · Maximize the density: o Use specification executed in Tundra 1U server with 3 busbars to support 100+ nodes per rack. Cost Effective Easier (and cheaper)

A g e n d a

3

● About Penguin Computing (& why we care about OCP

standards)

● Open rack evolution

● Rack profile overview

● Notable rack profiles

● Optimization imperative

● Recommended Changes

● Conclusion

● Discussion

Page 4: RECOMMENDED PROFILES RACKS · Maximize the density: o Use specification executed in Tundra 1U server with 3 busbars to support 100+ nodes per rack. Cost Effective Easier (and cheaper)

A b o u t P e n g u i n C o m p u t i n g

4

● Home to Scyld® Beowulf cluster software &

bare metal HPC on cloud Penguin Computing

On-Demand™

● Over 300 OCP racks delivered to date based on

Tundra™ Extreme Scale design

● Platinum OCP member, Penguin CTO Phil

Pokorny is HPC representative of the OCP

Incubation Committee

● U.S.-based 20 year old, global provider of

HPC hardware, software, and services

Page 5: RECOMMENDED PROFILES RACKS · Maximize the density: o Use specification executed in Tundra 1U server with 3 busbars to support 100+ nodes per rack. Cost Effective Easier (and cheaper)

O p e n R a c k E v o l u t i o n

5

● Open Rack○ Innovative standard since 2012○ Enlarged rack unit and width○ Cold aisle installation and service

● Key updates since latest version (v2.0)o Two depths (800mm, 660mm)o Two DC busbar voltages (12Vdc, 48Vdc)

● Multiple Options○ (2) Depth x (2) Bus bar voltages x (2) Bus bar no. x

(2) Rack units x….. Source: Open Rack Standard

Page 6: RECOMMENDED PROFILES RACKS · Maximize the density: o Use specification executed in Tundra 1U server with 3 busbars to support 100+ nodes per rack. Cost Effective Easier (and cheaper)

R a c k P r o f i l e O v e r v i e w

6

Short (660mm) Deep (800mm) Short (660mm) Deep (800mm)

Short (660mm) Deep (800mm) Short (660mm) Deep (800mm)

Vo

lta

ge

48

V1

2V

II

DC Bus Bar No.3 1

I

IV III

Others

Page 7: RECOMMENDED PROFILES RACKS · Maximize the density: o Use specification executed in Tundra 1U server with 3 busbars to support 100+ nodes per rack. Cost Effective Easier (and cheaper)

N o t a b l e R a c k P r o f i l e s

7

● 12Vdc + 1 DC Bus Bar○ Open Rack v2○ Deep depth (800mm)

● 12Vdc + 3 DC Bus Bar*o Open Rack v1o High density, High power capacity, and

Robustnesso Deep depth (800mm)

● 48Vdc + 1 DC Bus Bar○ Higher voltage for better power usage

effectiveness (PUE)○ Both short (660mm) and deep (800mm) depths

* Spec in submission to

OCP Foundation for

technical review - Q2’18

Page 8: RECOMMENDED PROFILES RACKS · Maximize the density: o Use specification executed in Tundra 1U server with 3 busbars to support 100+ nodes per rack. Cost Effective Easier (and cheaper)

O p t i m i z a t i o n I m p e r a t i v e

8

● The deduction of build cost is limited by

too many options, so is the acceptance of

OCP design

Infrastructure design optimization is

imperative to support increased demands

of efficiency, flexibility, and scalability

○ Determine the parameters that lead to the best ‘performance’

○ Reduce waste

Page 9: RECOMMENDED PROFILES RACKS · Maximize the density: o Use specification executed in Tundra 1U server with 3 busbars to support 100+ nodes per rack. Cost Effective Easier (and cheaper)

R e c o m m e n d e d C h a n g e s t o 4 8 V d c R a c k

9

● Maximize the density:

o Use specification executed in Tundra 1U server with 3 busbars to support 100+ nodes per rack.

● Cost Effective

○ Easier (and cheaper) to deliver more than 33kw with three bus bars instead of one.

○ Easier to distribute powers to the whole rack by placing the power shelf in the middle.

● Flexibility○ 3 busbar location is more flexible to adopting existing IT devices.

Page 10: RECOMMENDED PROFILES RACKS · Maximize the density: o Use specification executed in Tundra 1U server with 3 busbars to support 100+ nodes per rack. Cost Effective Easier (and cheaper)

C o n c l u s i o n

10

● Recommend to embrace three

bus bars design when moving to

48Vdc.

● 800mm depth to contain existing

IT gear and power shelves.

● Cheaper, more flexible way to

deliver >33kW

Page 11: RECOMMENDED PROFILES RACKS · Maximize the density: o Use specification executed in Tundra 1U server with 3 busbars to support 100+ nodes per rack. Cost Effective Easier (and cheaper)

11

Discussion

Page 12: RECOMMENDED PROFILES RACKS · Maximize the density: o Use specification executed in Tundra 1U server with 3 busbars to support 100+ nodes per rack. Cost Effective Easier (and cheaper)

Recommended