RED IBÉRICA MM5RED IBÉRICA MM544thth Meeting, Aveiro Meeting, Aveiro2626thth-27-27thth April, 2007 April, 2007
Wind field evaluation of the Wind field evaluation of the MM5 over the Strait of GibraltarMM5 over the Strait of Gibraltar
2020thth-23-23rd rd August, 2004August, 2004 E. Reyes, A. Izquierdo, O. Alvarez, E. Reyes, A. Izquierdo, O. Alvarez,
C. Mejias, S. VinogradovC. Mejias, S. Vinogradov Applied Physics Department. Cádiz University, SpainApplied Physics Department. Cádiz University, Spain
[email protected]@uca.es
OUTLINES
INTRODUCTION AIMS MM5 IMPLEMENTATION OPERATIONAL SYSTEM FRAMEWORK EVALUATION METHODOLOGY PRELIMINARY RESULTS CONCLUDING REMARKS
INTRODUCTION
• The mesoescale atmospheric model MM5 is used to force a hydrodynamic model UCA2.5 (Izquierdo et al., 2001) in the Strait of Gibraltar
• As a prerequisite for such studies, the atmospheric model has to be implemented and validated in the Strait of Gibraltar.
• A major part of such a validation is the comparison of simulation results with observational data and with the results from other models, which have been independently developed.
• In this study 72-hour simulated wind field with the MM5 at different resolutions (30 km,10 km and 3.3 km) from the period 20-23 August 2004 has been compared and evaluated with the wind direction and intensity measurements from 6 automatic meteorological stations from the Spanish Meteorological National Institute within the model domain and with simulated wind field of HIRLAM (0.2°)
AIMS
• Principal aim: providing atmospheric forcing to hydrodynamic models in the local scale: Strait of Gibraltar.
1. Implementation of the high resolution model MM5 in the Gulf of Cadiz - Strait of Gibraltar and Alborán Sea system
2. Creation of three domains with different resolutions (30, 10 and 3.3 km) in one way nesting
3. Evaluation of atmospheric model: it starts with the wind field from the different domains
MM5 IMPLEMENTATION
N° domains 1 2 3
Resolution (km) 30 10 3.3
Input data resolution (km) 4 0.9 0.9
Nesting 1 way 1 way 1 way
Vertical levels 35 35 35
Time step (seconds) 90 30 10
30 km 10 km 3.3 km
RUNNING MM5
OPERATIONAL SYSTEM FRAMEWORK
MM5 10 kmMM5 10 km MMINPUT_D2MMINPUT_D2LOWBDY_D2LOWBDY_D2BDYOUT_D2BDYOUT_D2
MM5 10 kmMM5 10 km
+TERRAIN_D2
MMOUT_D2MMOUT_D2
NESTDOWNNESTDOWN
MMINPUT_D3MMINPUT_D3LOWBDY_D3LOWBDY_D3BDYOUT_D3BDYOUT_D3
+TERRAIN_D3
MM5 3.3 kmMM5 3.3 km
MMOUT_D3MMOUT_D3
ftp
INTERPBINTERPB
MMOUTP_D3MMOUTP_D3
Read_v3.f90 MM5toGrAds
+LOWBDY_D2+TERRAIN_D3
EVALUATION METHODOLOGY
CEUTA
TARIFA
VEJERS. FERNANDO
CÁDIZ
ARENOSILLO
Location of the automatic meteorological stations INM
STATION NAME
UTC TIME OFFICIAL TIME
ALTITUDE (m)
TEMPERATURE (C)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY
ACCUMULATED PRECIPITATION
WIND INTENSITY (km/h)
WIND DIRECTION (degrees)
MAX. WIND INTENSITY (km/h)
PRESSURE (mb)
Observed data from A.M.S.
MM5 vs. OBSERVATIONSMM5 vs. HIRLAM 0.2º
DOMAIN 1 = 30 km DOMAIN 2 = 10 km
2m TEMPERATURE (ºC)
PRELIMINARY RESULTS
DOMINIO 3 = 3.3 km
DOMINIO 1 = 30 km
DOMINIO 2 = 10 km
2m TEMPERATURE (ºC)
PRELIMINARY RESULTS
DOMAIN 1 = 30 km DOMAIN 2 = 10 km
10 m WIND SPEED (m/s)
PRELIMINARY RESULTS
10 m WIND SPEED (m/s)DOMINIO 1 = 30 km
DOMINIO 2 = 10 km
DOMINIO 3 = 3.3 km
PRELIMINARY RESULTS
DOMAIN 1 = 30 km DOMAIN 2 = 10 km
SEA LEVEL PRESSURE (hPa)
PRELIMINARY RESULTS
EVALUATION OF THE 10 m WIND SPEED (m/s)MM5 (30, 10 and 3.3 km) vs. OBSERVATIONS
PRELIMINARY RESULTS
20/08 0 :00 21/08 0 :00 22/08 0 :00 23/08 0 :00Tim e (d ays)
0
90
180
270
360
win
d d
ire
ctio
n (
de
ge
es)
0
2
4
6
win
d in
ten
sity
(m
/s)
E l A R EN OSIL L Ow ind d irection observed (degrees)
w ind in tensity observed (m /s)
w ind d irection M M 5 30 km (degrees)
w ind in tensity M M 5 30 km (m /s)
w ind d irection M M 5 10 km (degrees)
w ind in tensity M M 5 10 km (m /s)
20/08 0 :00 21/08 0 :00 22/08 0 :00 23/08 0 :00Tim e (d a ys)
0
90
180
270
360
win
d d
ire
ctio
n (
de
gre
es)
0
4
8
12
win
d in
ten
sity
(m
/s)
C Á D IZ - C OR A TD U R A w ind d irection observed (degrees)
w ind in tensity observed (m /s)
w ind d irection M M 5 30 km (degrees)
w ind in tensity M M 5 30 km (m /s)
w ind d irection M M 5 10 km (degrees)
w ind in tensity M M 5 10 km (m /s)
w ind d irection M M 5 3.3 km (degrees)
w ind in tensity M M 5 3 .3 km (m /s)
PRELIMINARY RESULTS
EVALUATION OF THE 10 m WIND SPEED 10 m (m/s)MM5 (30, 10 and 3.3 km) vs. OBSERVATIONS
20/08 0 :00 21/08 0 :00 22/08 0 :00 23/08 0 :00Tim e (d a ys)
0
90
180
270
360
win
d d
ire
ctio
n (
de
gre
es)
0
4
8
12
win
d in
ten
sity
(m
/s)
S . FER N AN D Ow ind d irection observed (degrees)
w ind in tensity observed (m /s)
w ind d irection M M 5 30 km (degrees)
w ind in tensity M M 5 30 km (m /s)
w ind d irection M M 5 10 km (degrees)
w ind in tensity M M 5 10 km (m /s)
w ind d irection M M 5 3.3 km (degrees)
w ind in tensity M M 5 3.3 km (m /s)
20/08 0 :00 21/08 0 :00 22/08 0 :00 23/08 0 :00Tim e (d ays)
0
90
180
270
360
win
d d
ire
ctio
n (
de
gre
es)
0
4
8
12
win
d in
ten
sity
(m
/s)
C EU TAw ind d irection observed (degrees)
w ind in tensity observed (m /s)
w ind d irection M M 5 30 km (degrees)
w ind in tensity M M 5 30 km (m /s)
w ind d irection M M 5 10 km (degrees)
w ind in tensity M M 5 10 km (m /s)
w ind d irection M M 5 3.3 km (degrees)
w ind in tensity M M 5 3.3 km (m /s)
PRELIMINARY RESULTS
20/08 0 :00 21/08 0 :00 22/08 0 :00 23/08 0 :00Tim e (d a ys)
0
90
180
270
360
win
d d
ire
ctio
n (
de
gre
es)
0
4
8
12
win
d in
ten
sity
(m
/s)
V EJE Rw ind d irec ion observed (degrees)
w ind in tensity observed (m /s)
w ind d irection M M 5 30 km (degrees)
w ind in tensity M M 5 30 km (m /s)
w ind d irection M M 5 10 km (degrees)
w ind in tensity M M 5 10 km (m /s)
w ind d irection M M 5 3.3 km (degrees)
w ind in tensity M M 5 3 .3 km (m /s)
EVALUATION OF THE 10 m WIND SPEED (m/s)MM5 (30, 10 and 3.3 km) vs. OBSERVATIONS
20/08 0 :00 21/08 0 :00 22/08 0 :00 23/08 0 :00Tim e (d ays)
0
90
180
270
360
win
d d
ire
ctio
n (
de
gre
es)
0
4
8
12
16
win
d in
ten
sity
(m
/s)
TA R IFAw ind d irection observed (degrees)
w ind in tensity observed (m /s)
w ind d irection M M 5 30 km (degrees)
w ind in tensity M M 5 30 km (m /s)
w ind d irection M M 5 10 km (degrees)
w ind in tensity M M 5 10 km (m /s)
w ind d irection M M 5 3.3 km (degrees)
w ind in tensity M M 5 3 .3 km (m /s)
DOMAIN 30 km MM5 DOMAIN 0.2 HIRLAM (INM)
EVALUATION OF THE 10 m WIND SPEED (m/s)MM5 (30 km) vs. HIRLAM (0.2 °)
20/08/2004 00:00
PRELIMINARY RESULTS
DOMAIN 30 km MM5 DOMAIN 0.2 HIRLAM (INM)
EVALUATION OF THE SEA LEVEL PRESSURE (hPa)MM5 (30 km) vs. HIRLAM (0.2°)
20/08/2004 00:00
PRELIMINARY RESULTS
EVALUATION OF THE 10m WIND SPEED (m/s)MM5 (10 km) vs. HIRLAM (0.2º)
PRELIMINARY RESULTS
20/8/04 21/8/04 22/8/04 23/8/04Tim e (d a ys)
0
2
4
6
win
d in
ten
sity
(m
/s)
0
90
180
270
360
win
d d
ire
ctio
n (
de
gre
es)
EL AREN O S ILLOw ind intensity H IR LAM 0.2º (m /s)
w ind d irection H IR LAM 0.2º (degrees)
w ind in tensity M M 5 10 km (m /s)
w ind d irection M M 5 10 km (degrees)
w ind in tensity observed (m /s)
w ind d irection observed (degrees)
8/20/04 8/21/04 8/22/04 8/23/04Tim e (d a ys)
0
4
8
12
win
d in
ten
sity
(m
/s)
0
90
180
270
360
win
d d
ire
ctio
n (
de
gre
es)
C ÁD IZ- C OR TAD U R Aw ind in tensity H IR LAM 0.2º (m /s)
w ind d irection H IR LAM 0.2º (degrees)
w ind in tensity M M 5 10 km (m /s)
w ind d irection M M 5 10 km (degrees)
w ind in tensity observed (m /s)
w ind d irection observed (degrees)
EVALUATION OF THE 10 m WIND SPEED (m/s)MM5 (10 km) vs. HIRLAM (0.2º)
PRELIMINARY RESULTS
20/8/04 21/8/04 22/8/04 23/8/04Tim e (d a ys)
0
4
8
12
win
d in
ten
sity
(m
/s)
0
90
180
270
360
win
d d
ire
ctio
n (
de
gre
es)
S . FER N AN D Ow ind in tensity H IR LAM 0.2º (m /s)
w ind d irection H IR LAM 0.2º (degrees)
w ind in tensity M M 5 10 km (m /s)
w ind d irection M M 5 10 km (degrees)
w ind in tensity observed (m /s)
w ind d irection observed (degrees)
20/8 /04 21/8 /04 22/8 /04 23/8 /04Tim e (d a ys)
0
2
4
6
8
10
win
d in
ten
sity
(m
/s)
0
90
180
270
360
win
d d
ire
ctio
n (
de
gre
es)
C EU TAw ind in tensity H IR LAM 0.2º (m /s)
w ind d irection H IR LAM 0.2º (degrees)
w ind in tensity M M 5 10 km (m /s)
w ind d irection M M 5 10 km (degrees)
w ind in tensity observed (m /s)
w ind d irection observed (degrees)
EVALUATION OF THE 10 m WIND SPEED (m/s)MM5 (10 km) vs. HIRLAM (0.2º)
PRELIMINARY RESULTS
20/8/04 21/8/04 22/8/04 23/8/04Tim e (d a ys)
0
4
8
12
16
win
d in
ten
sity
(m
/s)
0
90
180
270
360
win
d d
ire
ctio
n (
de
gre
es)
TAR IFAw ind in tensity H IR LAM 0.2º (m /s)
w ind d irection H IR LAM 0.2º (degrees)
w ind in tensity M M 5 10 km (m /s)
w ind d irection M M 5 10 km (degrees)
w ind in tensity observed (m /s)
w ind d irection observed (degrees)
20/8/04 21/8 /04 22/8 /04 23/8 /04 Tim e (da ys)
0
4
8
12
win
d in
ten
sity
(m
/s)
0
90
180
270
360
win
d d
ire
ctio
n (
de
gre
es)
VEJERw ind intensity H IR LAM 0.2º (m /s)
w ind d irection H IR LAM 0.2º (degrees)
w ind intensity M M 5 10 km (m /s)
w ind d irection M M 5 10 km (degrees)
w ind intensity observed (m /s)
w ind d irection observed (degrees)
CONCLUDING REMARKS
• Wind direction field is well simulated for the MM5 model.• Model may capture the magnitudes of the wind intensity changes• The atmospheric simulation improves after the increase of the grid resolution in the case of the 2 m temperature, sea level pressure and 10 m wind speed.• A quantitative analysis is necessary to obtain better conclusions.• A web site with atmospheric and hydrodynamic forecast (72 hours prediction horizon) for the Strait of Gibraltar and Algeciras Bay has been developed.http://vinniuca.rshu.ru/prediccionhttp://150.214.84.40.rshu.ru/prediccion
2. Atmosphere-ocean model
2. Forcing of the atmospheric to the hydrodynamic model.
forcing
1. Evaluation of all variables (Tª, pressure, wind,… ) of the atmospheric model vs. observations (from marine buoys, ships of opportunity and
satellite data over the ocean) and vs. other models independently developed
3. Evaluation atmosphere-ocean model
3. Evaluation of the atmosphere-ocean model (output vs. in-situ data)4. Study of the spatial and temporal variability of the circulation (including atmospheric forcing) in the Gulf of Cádiz –Strait of Gibraltar area.
FUTURE WORK
UCA2.5D(Izquierdo et
al., 2001)
Atmospheric regional
model MM5(3.3 km)
1.Evaluation MM5 vs. observations
• MeteoGalicia group for his invaluable help, kind collaboration and boundary conditions providing.
• INM for the data support and A.M.S. maintaining
• Red Ibérica MM5 for making easier and better the work of the MM5 beginner.
THANK TO
I can not change the wind direction but I can adjust the sails to come always to my destination
THANK YOU VERY MUCH!!!THANK YOU VERY MUCH!!!