Date: March 17, 2015 File: 1273-19

City of Prince George 1100 Patricia Boulevard Prince George, BC V2L3V9 Attention: Hillary Morgan, Planner Reference: University Heights Rezoning Application RZ100470 March 30th Public Hearing Dear Ms. Morgan, Thank you for participating in the meeting which was held at the City of Prince George on March 3rd, 2015. As you know, the purpose of the meeting was to discuss the concerns that were raised during the Public Hearing for the above-referenced application on March 2nd, 2015. Since the meeting with the City, L&M has prepared the following supplementary information which we believe strengthens the application for the proposed multi-family development. In addition to this meeting, we also met with the representative for University Mountain View Estates, R Radloff & Associates on March 10th, 2015 and have spoken with several other neighbouring property owners. As explained during the initial Public Hearing on March 02, 2015, this rezoning application represents an amendment to the existing RM3 Mutli-Family zone boundary in order to provide additional space that will ultimately allow for integration of single family, duplex and medium density townhousing. This integration of single to medium density housing will facilitate a smooth transition between the existing single family housing and the proposed multi-family development. Additionally, a wide greenspace has been dedicated to construction of a berm which will help shield existing and future development from the traffic on Tyner Boulevard. Please find enclosed the following information, which we would like to be included as supplementary information in the Staff Report to Council for Council’s review and consideration at the postponed Public Hearing scheduled for March 30th, 2015:

Traffic Impact Study Update

Conceptual Multi-Family Development Traffic Impact Study Update

During the Public Hearing on March 02, 2015, several concerns regarding the 2009 Traffic Impact Study were raised. The concerns included:

Impacts to daily users of Tyner Boulevard;

That the potential maximum density of 241 multi-family dwelling units, if achieved, would be too much traffic for the local road;

That the potential maximum density of 241 multi-family dwelling units, if achieved, would add

I ---~ 1210FourthAvenue ~ Prince George, B.C. V2L 3J4

Tel. (250) 562-1977 ENGINEERING LIMITED Fax (250) 562-1967

PLANNING CENTRE

• •

• •

•

Infinity Properties Page 2 of 4 Date: March 17, 2015 L&M Engineering Limited L&M File No.: 1273-19

too much traffic to the existing University Heights subdivision;

That the existing intersection of University Heights Drive and Tyner Boulevard could not support additional traffic;

That the existing intersection of University Heights Drive and Tyner Boulevard already experiences traffic lining up into the existing University Heights subdivision; and

That the report, which was completed in 2009, may no longer be relevant due to the level of growth that has occurred since the report’s completion.

In response to these concerns, and under the advisement of the City’s Administration, Terry Fjellstrom the Senior Traffic Engineer at L&M Engineering Limited completed a review of the 2009 Traffic Impact Study (see attached Traffic Impact Study Update). The updated report includes a current traffic count at the intersection of University Heights Drive and Tyner Boulevard, completed during peak traffic hours in the morning and evening. The report also reviewed the original assumptions made regarding background traffic growth to confirm that the original assumptions are still consistent with the current traffic trends. The report concludes that due to topographical challenges and the desire to create larger wider lots, the number of total dwelling units that will be constructed on the property is 414 compared to the 571 units initially assumed in 2009, which represents an overall decrease of 27%. Further, the Tyner Boulevard/University Heights Drive intersection will continue to operate at an acceptable level of service through the build out of the 414 units. With the total size of the development reduced, the recommendations within the original study remain just as valid. In addition to the Traffic Study Update, the configuration of Rowe Street was also amended so that it no longer connects through to University Mountain View Estates’ property. Instead, Rowe Street is now proposed to function as a crescent, which will connect back to University Heights Drive as shown on the enclosed Conceptual Multi-Family Development plan. Residential Development Yield

A conceptual multi-family development layout was not required and therefore was not included as part of the original Rezoning application. Further, the applicant wished to preserve flexibility due to the unknown future market demands for multi-family developments in Prince George. Infinity envisions single detached units and duplexes or a mix of duplexes, triplexes and fourplexes. During the Public Hearing however, numerous concerns were raised regarding the maximum permitted residential density for the RM3 zone. The main issue was that the proposed amendment area would facilitate the development of up to 241 mutli-family residential dwelling units at the proposed location which would not integrate well into the existing single family subdivision and would create unwanted traffic congestion. The applicant had no intention of pursuing maximum densities on the site as per preliminary discussions with the City. Despite our efforts to explain that we would not pursue the maximum permitted density of 241 units, the community’s concerns were clear in wanting to see this reinforced.

•

•

•

J&~ ENGINEERING LIMITED

PLANNING CENTRE

Infinity Properties Page 3 of 4 Date: March 17, 2015 L&M Engineering Limited L&M File No.: 1273-19

We discussed this challenge during our meeting with Administration on March 3rd, 2015 to provide some reassurance to the surrounding property owners and Council. At present, the RM3 zone permits a maximum residential density of 60 dwelling units per hectare, which is neither achievable nor desired by Infinity Properties as mentioned earlier. The most efficient solution discussed would be to volunteer to register a Section 219 Covenant, which would limit the density of the proposed multi-family development to 25 dwelling units per hectare. This proposed density of 25 dwelling units per hectare would permit the development of 100 residential dwelling units as shown on Conceptual Multi-Family Development. Together with the proposed amendment to the City of Prince George Multi-Family Development Permit Guidelines, we believe that we could still successfully achieve the 35% multiple family density target outlined in the University Heights Neighbourhood Plan, while ensuring that the proposed multi-family development is compatible with the existing single family subdivision. The enclosed Conceptual Multi-Family Development plan illustrates the maximum number of units that could be achieved in the proposed multi-family development. While the plan is only a concept drawing, we believe that the proposed density limiting Covenant and the Development Permit process will prevent future conflicts with the surrounding community because the density, form and character of the development would be regulated and subject to approval by the City of Prince George. While Infinity is pursuing the rezoning ∕ boundary amendment for the entire multi-family area, it has always been the intention to phase the proposed multi-family development into two, stand-alone projects. The first, southerly site was anticipated to develop with the Ridge Phase 5, while the second, northerly site was anticipated to develop with a future phase. This would further limit the amount of units being created at any given point in time. Infinity is committed to furthering the City`s vision for this master-planned community in ways that are measured, complementary, and appropriate. Community Engagement

The initial Public Hearing on March 02, 2015 was postponed by Council until March 30th, 2015 so that Infinity Properties could meet with University Mountain View Estates in an attempt to resolve concerns surrounding traffic and residential yield in the proposed multi-family site. Upon this recommendation, L&M Engineering met with R. Radloff & Associates on March 10th, 2015 to discuss the updated traffic report and the proposed density limiting Covenant. Following the March 10 th, 2015 meeting, L&M received confirmation from R. Radloff & Associates that University Mountain View Estates were satisfied with the above-referenced documents that L&M had completed. No other concerns were identified by R. Radloff & Associates. During the Public Hearing, neighbours of the existing University Heights subdivision in attendance voiced their concerns about the impact that this proposed multi-family development would have on their community and individual property values. Since the Public Hearing, we have received numerous phone calls from residents looking for more information and to express their concerns. Many of the questions are regarding the appearance and residential density of the proposed development. A recurring concern that has been specifically stressed is the lack of notification to the neighbours that a change was occurring in their subdivision.

J&~ ENGINEERING LIMITED

PLANNING CENTRE

Infinity Properties Page 4 of 4 Date: March 17, 2015 L&M Engineering Limited L&M File No.: 1273-19

In an effort to provide an additional outlet for residents to voice their opinions and concerns, we have proposed a Community Meeting for Thursday March 26th at the Columbus Centre in College Heights starting at 7:00 pm. The meeting will include a formal presentation by L&M followed by an informal question and answer period in an open house format. We propose to have maps and application drawings displayed around the room with Terry Fjellstrom the professional engineer responsible for traffic calculations and design; Jason Boyes the professional engineer responsible for subdivision design; and myself, the community planner responsible for overseeing the rezoning application ready to answer individual questions. We believe that by hosting this community meeting, we will be able to provide reassurance to the neighbourhood that this proposal will not negatively affect their lifestyle, and will ultimately enhance the overall community by reaching the City’s targets for varied housing choices. Summary

We would like to thank the Administration for their time and efforts in working collaboratively on this application. We appreciate the opportunity to revisit this application and have reviewed the 2009 Traffic Impact Study, suggested a density limiting Covenant and prepared a conceptual site plan to better illustrate the proposal, address the concerns of surrounding property owners, and provide reassurance that this proposed amendment to the Zoning Bylaw boundaries will not negatively affect the community. If you require any additional information or have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Sincerely, L&M ENGINEERING LIMITED Ashley Elliott, Community Planner Copies to: Terry Fjellstrom, P.Eng, President L&M Engineering Limited Jason Boyes, P.Eng, Associate L&M Engineering Limited Quentin Boulton, Infinity Properties Ltd. Enclosure: As Noted. G:\Job Files\1200\1273 - BFW\19 - Phase 4\00-Planning\Ltr to CoPG RE Postponed PH.doc

J&~ ENGINEERING LIMITED

PLANNING CENTRE

Date: 15th

March, 2015

File: 1273-20-00

City of Prince George

1100 Patricia Boulevard

Prince George BC V2L 3V9

Attention: Ms. Hillary Morgan

Planner

Reference: University Heights Neighbourhood

Traffic Study Update

Dear Hillary,

Further to your request, we are pleased to provide you with a review of the Traffic Impact Study

that we prepared in September 2009 for the University Heights Residential development.

1.0 2009 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

In 2009 Infinity Properties Inc. (formerly BFW Developments Ltd) purchased 52 hectares of

property from the City of Prince George (CoPG). In support of the rezoning of the property,

Infinity commissioned L&M Engineering Limited to prepare a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to

identify the impact of the development on the surrounding road network. The following three

intersections were analyzed:

1. Tyner Boulevard/University Heights Road

2. Tyner Boulevard/Ospika Boulevard

3. Tyner Boulevard/Highway 16

Utilizing a preliminary subdivision plan and maximum densities for the multiple family

developments the TIS was based upon 300 single family dwellings and 271 multi-family

dwellings. For the purposes of the study the development was analyzed over 2 phases. Phase 1

consisted of 63 single family units and Phase 2 was at full build out at 300 single family and 271

multifamily dwellings.

As is typical, the TIS analysis period is projected over a 15 year horizon. Background traffic is

counted and a suitable factor is applied to grow the existing traffic over this period. A 2.0%

linear growth rate was used in the study.

I _JI?_ ~ 1210 Fourth Avenue -•~illiilll Prince George, B.C. V2L 3J4 Tel. (250) 562-1977

ENGINEERING LIMITED Fax (250) 562-1967

) University Heights Neighbourhood Date: 15

th March, 2015

Traffic Study Update File: 1273-20-00

The development traffic is then added to the projected background traffic to generate the total

traffic utilizing the individual intersections. The intersections were analyzed during an AM Peak

and a PM peak period to determine the effect of the development on the road network.

The 2009 Study concluded that the following improvements would be required:

1. Construct an eastbound left turn slot on Tyner Boulevard at the Tyner

Blvd/University Heights Drive Intersection to TAC standards with a minimum of 30

metres storage, 60 metres deceleration and appropriate bay tapers after the

construction of approximately 250 single family homes and 50 multifamily homes.

2. Construct a westbound right turn deceleration lane on Tyner Boulevard at the

Tyner Boulevard/ University Heights Drive intersection after the construction of

approximately 140 single family homes.

3. Lengthen the existing eastbound left turn lane on Tyner Boulevard at the Tyner

Boulevard/Ospika Boulevard intersection from 30 metres to 51 metres after the

construction of approximately 90 single family homes.

Subsequent to the completion of the study it was agreed upon with the CoPG and MoT to

register a covenant on the property requiring an update to the study once 420 building permits

have been issued.

2.0 2015 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE

During the public hearing conducted on March 2nd

2015, Council questioned whether the study

prepared in 2009 is still valid. As mentioned previously, studies are analyzed over a 15 year

period and should account for growth in background traffic. To confirm whether the original

assumptions are still valid we have conducted new counts at the intersection of Tyner

Boulevard and University Heights Drive. An analysis was then conducted at this intersection.

The results are presented below:

2.1 Existing Background Traffic Counts

Traffic counts were conducted on Wednesday March 4th

2015 during the PM peak from

4:00pm to 6:00pm and on Thursday March 5th

2015 during the AM peak from 7:00am to

9:00am. The counts were conducted using standard vehicle classifications. The counts

were then compared to the existing counts conducted in 2008. The 2015 background

counts were generally within 10% of the counts projected from the 2009 study with the

exception of the westbound movement towards UNBC which was 50% of the volume

from the 2009 study. The count conducted on Thursday morning was after the

commencement of the strike at UNBC. It appears that the strike has affected the traffic

/ University Heights Neighbourhood Date: 15

th March, 2015

Traffic Study Update File: 1273-20-00

volume in this direction. The Wednesday count was not affected by the strike. To

compensate for this anomaly this movement has been increased by 130%.

The traffic counts are shown in Figure 1. A copy of the traffic count is shown in Appendix

A.

2.2 Projected Background traffic

The background traffic counts were projected to 2023 using the 2.0% linear growth rate

used in the original study.

2.3 Existing Development

An inventory of the current development was conducted with the flowing results:

• Occupied houses 61

• Houses constructed but not occupied 5

• Houses under construction 21

The traffic counts conducted included the houses currently occupied

2.4 Current Development Plan

An overall subdivision plan has now been prepared for the entire rezoned property. 264

single family homes and 150 multifamily dwelling units can be constructed on the

property. Due to larger lot sizes, topographical constraints and lower density multi-family,

the actual number of dwellings that can be constructed is considerably less than was

assumed in the original TIS which was based upon 300 single family and 271 multifamily

units.

2.5 Trip Generation

The trip generation rates used in this study were obtained from the Institute of

Transportation Engineers Trip Generation 8th

edition. The rates give an indication of the

range of vehicles expected to enter and exit a particular land use site for various peak

traffic flows.

The ITE Code (210) for Single-Family Detached Housing was used to develop trip

generation volumes for the proposed single family lots and strata lots. For the multi-

family development the ITE Code (231) Low-Rise Residential Condominium/Townhouse

was utilized. The rates and trip generation for each land use are summarized in Tables 1

and 2.

5 University Heights Neighbourhood Date: 15

th March, 2015

Traffic Study Update File: 1273-20-00

TABLE 2

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC

PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION RATES

Phase Land Use Peak

Period

Development

Size

Traffic

Generation

Variable

(x)

Traffic

Generation

Rate

(vph)

%

In

%

Out

1 Existing

Development

a.m. 61 Dwelling Units Dwelling Units * 45 55

p.m. 61 Dwelling Units Dwelling Units * 33 67

2

Single Family

Housing

a.m. 203 Dwelling Units** Dwelling Units T=0.70(x) +9.74 25 75

p.m. 203 Dwelling Units** Dwelling Units T=0.90Ln(x) +0.51 63 37

Multiple

Family Housing

a.m. 150 Dwelling Units Dwelling Units 0.67 25 75

p.m. 150 Dwelling Units Dwelling Units 0.78 58 42

TABLE 3

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

TOTAL TRIP GENERATION

Phase Land Use Peak Period

Inbound

Traffic

(vph)

Outbound

Traffic

(vph)

Total

Traffic

(vph)

1 Existing Development a.m. * * *

p.m. * * *

2

Single Family Housing a.m. 38 114 152

p.m. 100 59 159

Multiple Family

Housing

a.m. 25 75 100

p.m. 68 49 117

* Trip generation for existing development is included in the traffic counts conducted on March 4th

and 5th 2015.

** The total dwelling units account for the 61 existing units (i.e. 239-61=178 units)

2.6 Trip Distribution

The trip distribution assumed in the original study was compared to that observed in the

March 2015 counts. With the exception of the southbound egress during the PM peak all

other movements generally were in accordance with the original study’s assumption of

80% of the traffic would originate from the east and 20% from the west although slightly

more weighted towards the west. The PM peak egress showed more traffic heading west

than east. Given the small sample size of the March 2015 count this movement was

adjusted to 60% from the east and 40% from the west. The trip distribution is shown in

Figure 3.

> University Heights Neighbourhood Date: 15

th March, 2015

Traffic Study Update File: 1273-20-00

2.7 Total Traffic

The projected background traffic volumes as shown in Figure 2, when added with the

development traffic shown in Figure 4, results in the 2023 Total Traffic shown in Figure 5.

2.8 Method of Analysis

To analyze the performance of the study intersections and calculate the capacity and

"level of service" of each intersection, the Synchro Studio Version 7 Software has been

used. This software was developed by Trafficware Ltd. and is based on the methods and

procedures in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual.

Computer printouts showing the detailed calculation for each individual movement at

each study intersection are provided in Appendix B.

The concept of "Level of Service” is defined as a qualitative measure describing

operational conditions within a traffic stream, and their perception by motorists. A level

of service definition generally describes these conditions in terms of such factors as speed

and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience,

and safety.

The six levels of service are defined in the Highway Capacity Manual as follows:

• Level of Service A represents free flow. Individual users are virtually unaffected by the

presence of others in the traffic stream. Freedom to select desired speeds and to

maneuver within the traffic stream is extremely high. The general level of comfort and

convenience provided to the motorist is excellent.

• Level of Service B is in the range of stable flow, but the presence of other users in the

traffic stream begins to be noticeable. Freedom to select desired speeds is relatively

unaffected, but there is a slight decline in the freedom to maneuver within the traffic

stream from Level of Service A. The level of comfort and convenience provided is

somewhat less than at Level of Service A, because the presence of others in the traffic

stream begins to affect individual behavior.

• Level of Service C is the range of stable flow, but marks the beginning of the range of

flow in which the operation of individual users becomes significantly affected by

interaction with others in the traffic stream. The selection of speed is now affected by the

presence of others, and maneuvering within the traffic stream requires substantial

vigilance on the part of the user. The general level of comfort and convenience declines

noticeably at this level.

A University Heights Neighbourhood Date: 15

th March, 2015

Traffic Study Update File: 1273-20-00

• Level of Service D represents high-density, but stable, traffic flow. Speed and freedom

to maneuver are severally restricted, and the driver experiences a generally poor level of

comfort and convenience. Small increases in traffic flow will generally cause operational

problems at this level.

• Level of Service E represents operating conditions at, or near, the capacity level. All

speeds are reduced to a low, but relatively uniform value. Freedom to maneuver within

the traffic stream is extremely difficult, and is generally accomplished by forcing a vehicle

to "give way” to accommodate such maneuvers. Comfort and convenience levels are

extremely poor, and driver or pedestrian frustration is generally high. Operations at this

level are usually unstable, because small increases in flow and minor perturbations within

the traffic stream will cause breakdowns.

• Level of Service F is used to define forced or breakdown flow. This condition exists

wherever the amount of traffic approaching a point exceeds the amount which can

traverse the point. Queues form behind such locations. Operations within the queues

are characterized by stop-and-go waves, and they are extremely unstable. Vehicles may

progress at reasonable speeds for several hundred feet or more, then be required to stop

in a cyclic fashion. The Level of Service F is used to describe the operating conditions

within the queue, as well as the point of the breakdown.

Levels of Service Criteria, as defined by the Highway Capacity Manual, are illustrated in

Table 3.

TABLE 3 LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS

Level of Service

Impact on Street Traffic Unsignalized Intersection

Delay(s)

Signalized Intersection

Delay(s)

A Little or no delays 0 – 10 0 – 10

B Minor delays 10 – 15 10 – 20

C Average delays 15 – 25 20 – 35

D Long delays 25 – 35 35 – 55

E Very long delays 35 – 50 55 – 80

F Undesirable > 50 > 80

2.9 Tyner Boulevard/University Heights Drive

The Tyner Boulevard/University Heights Drive intersection is an unsignalized T-

intersection with the stop control on University Heights Drive. Tyner Boulevard at this

location is a two lane arterial road and University Heights Drive is a municipal collector.

C University Heights Neighbourhood Date: 15

th March, 2015

Traffic Study Update File: 1273-20-00

The Synchro analysis is summarized in Table 4. Detailed results can be found in Appendix

B.

The analysis shows that for the existing background traffic, the southbound lane on

University Heights Drive operates at a LOS B during the AM and PM peaks. This LOS

coincides with the visual observations conducted during the traffic counts with a

maximum of 2 vehicles queued on University Heights waiting to access Tyner Boulevard.

During the 2023 Total Traffic scenario, the southbound movement operates at a LOS D

and C during the AM and PM peak periods respectively.

The intersection will perform substantially better than originally assumed in the 2009 TIS

due to the reduced number of lots being constructed.

The intersection will perform satisfactory through to the year 2023.

2.10 Auxiliary Lanes

The 2009 TIS made recommendations for improvements to the Tyner Blvd/University

Heights Drive intersection based upon certain development thresholds being achieved.

Given that the background traffic growth is basically at the rate assumed in the original

study, these assumptions are still valid. The improvements include:

• Construct a westbound right turn deceleration lane on Tyner Boulevard after the

construction of 140 single family homes.

TABLE 4 TYNER BOULEVARD / UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS DRIVE

INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SUMMARY EASTBOUND SOUTHBOUND

LT/TH LT/RT

los delay los delay

A.M. PEAK

2015 Existing Background Traffic A 0.6 B 12.9

2023 Total Traffic A 1.4 D 26.8

P.M. PEAK

2015 Existing Background Traffic A 0.7 B 12.1

2023 Total Traffic A 2.2 C 24.8

D University Heights Neighbourhood Date: 15

th March, 2015

Traffic Study Update File: 1273-20-00

• Construct an eastbound left turn slot on Tyner Boulevard at the Tyner Blvd/Road A

Intersection to TAC standards with a minimum of 30 metres storage; 60 metres

deceleration and appropriate bay tapers after the construction of approximately 250

single family homes and 50 multifamily homes.

3.0 SUMMARY

The development density assumed in the original 2009 TIS was very conservative and was not

based upon a subdivision layout but rather maximum allowable densities for multifamily

dwellings. Due to topographical challenges and the desire to create larger lots, the number of

total dwelling units that will be constructed on the property is 414 compared to the 571 units

initially assumed in 2009. That represents a decrease of 27%.

The Tyner Boulevard/University heights Drive intersection operates at an acceptable Level of

Service (LOS) through the build out of the 414 units.

Although the size of the development has been reduced from the initial assumptions the

recommendations in the original study are still valid.

The required improvements that are:

1. Construct an eastbound left turn slot on Tyner Boulevard at the Tyner

Blvd/University Heights Drive Intersection to TAC standards with a minimum of 30

metres storage, 60 metres deceleration and appropriate bay tapers after the

construction of approximately 250 single family homes and 50 multifamily homes.

2. Construct a westbound right turn deceleration lane on Tyner Boulevard at the

Tyner Boulevard/ University Heights Drive intersection after the construction of

approximately 140 single family homes.

3. Lengthen the existing eastbound left turn lane on Tyner Boulevard at the Tyner

Boulevard/Ospika Boulevard intersection from 30 metres to 51 metres after the

construction of approximately 90 single family homes.

4.0 CLOSURE

This Traffic Impact Study has been prepared for the exclusive use of Infinity Properties and the

City of Prince George. Any use which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on or

decisions to be made based on it are the responsibility of such third parties. L&M Engineering

Limited accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of

decisions made or actions based on this study. The information and data contained within this

document represents L&M Engineering Limited’s professional judgment in accordance with the

E University Heights Neighbourhood Date: 15

th March, 2015

Traffic Study Update File: 1273-20-00

knowledge and information available to L&M Engineering Limited at the time of the report

preparation. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made.

Yours Very Truly,

L&M ENGINEERING LIMITED

Mr. Terry Fjellstrom

President

Copy to: Mr. Quentin Boulton Infinity Properties

Enclosures: As noted

G:\Job Files\1200\1273 - BFW\19 - Phase 4\00-Planning\TIS\2015 University Heights Traffic Study Update.docx

1210 FOURTH AVENUE

PRINCE GEORGE, B.C.

V2L 3J4

TEL. (250) 562-1977

FAX (250) 562-1967

MULTI 1

LEGEND

THE SOLE PURPOSE NOTE: N IS CONCEPTUAL AND BFiRR OF DWELLING UNITS THIS PLA MAXIMUM NUM OF 25 OF SHOWING THE OVENANTED DENSllY E MIX OF AT THE PROPOSED C ECTARE (DU/Ha). TH E SUBJECT DWELLING UNITS :ii ~OAD CONFIGURA~~NCli OF PRINCE HOUSING lYP~iNDING APPROVAL OF T TO CHANGE. LOPMENT PERMIT GEORGE DEVE

I

I

I I

I

I

DL 2616

I I

I

DL 1600

I

I

I

I

I

I

I C, Ct: § u..J

I -.J ::, 0 (lJ

Ct: u..J

l

PROPOS D PAVE~NER BO, LEVfirD CONNECljT F0RO~OWE STREE]) I WALKWAY

WALKWA I TO

\

\

8 ~

-~- ~ CfJJCJDoo

0 :z /CC

ti

I

DL 9262

- - --..j

I

L-----~I ____ ---:

--L___ __ _J

TY HEIGHTS DR UNIVERSI

I

I

IL______ - - -

M3 _ MULTI - , - ~:~:;gs6~~LOPMENT

- BOUNDARY

TOTAL AREA = 5-~~~a

BERM AREA = 1.3 AREA = 3.97ha TOTAL DEVELOPA!L~oo UNITS(25du/ha) MAXIMUM YIELD -

RM3 - MULTI EXISTING EVELOPMENT FAMILY D BOUNDARY

TOTAL AREA = 3-~~~a

BERM AREA = 1-3 AREA = 1.68ha TOTAL DEVELOPA!L~D1 UNITS(60du/ha) MAXIMUM YIELD -

NO. DATE RE\OSION

,~~~ E/\._GIIIE~~ II~, _lhllTE[

DRAWN:

CHECKED:

ENGINEER:

SDS

JRB

JRB

DR.

SURVEY FILE: C3D13_1273-19MULTl1.dwg DRAWING FILE:

CORRESPONDENCE: CPG

GRID:

DATE:

SCALES:

MARCH 2015

HORZ. 1 : 1 000

F COMPANIES INFINITY GROUP 0

UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS

CONCEPTUAL MULTI FAMILY

DEVELOPMENT (DL 2616)

DRAWING No.

I REV No.