References

Abuja, G.; Heindler, D. und Projektgruppe "Englisch als Arbeitssprache". (eds.) 1995a.Lehrplananalyse. EAA Servicehefte 1. Graz: ZSE, Bereich III,

Abuja, G.; Heindler, D. und Projektgruppe "Englisch als Arbeitssprache" (eds.) 1995b.Audiovisuelle Medien. EAA Servicehefte 2. Graz: ZSE, Bereich III.

Abuja, G.; Heindler, D. und Projektgruppe "Englisch als Arbeitssprache" (eds.)Printmedien. EAA Servicehefte 3. Graz: ZSE, Bereich III.

Abuja, G.; Heindler, D. und Projektgruppe "Englisch als Arbeitssprache" (eds.) 1997.Praxisberichte. EAA Servicehefte 4. Graz: ZSE, Bereich III.

Abuja, Gunther (ed.) 1996. Fremdsprachen als Arbeitssprachen : die Rolle des "nativespeakers" ; Projektgruppe "Englisch als Arbeitssprache“ Graz ; Wien : Zentrum fürSchulentwicklung.

Abuja, Gunther (ed.) 1998.Englisch als Arbeitssprache : Modelle, Erfahrungen undLehrerbildung. Graz : Zentrum für Schulentwicklung, BereichIII, (Berichte /Bundesministerium für Unterricht undKulturelle Angelegenheiten, Zentrum fürSchulentwicklung, Bereich 3 :Reihe 3).

Abuja, Gunther abd Dagmar Heindler (eds.) 1993.Englisch als Arbeitssprache :fachbezogenes Lernen von Fremdsprachen / - Graz : Zentrum für Schulversucheu.Schulentwicklung.

Abuja, Gunther and Dagmar Heindler. 1996. Formen zweisprachigen Lernens in Österreich.In Gianna Fruhauf et al. (eds) Praxis und Perspektiven bilingualen Lehrens undLernens in Europa. Alkmaar: Tstichting Europees Platform voor het NederlandsOnderwijs, 13-30.

Abuja, Gunther. 1999. DieVerwendung einer Fremdsprache als Arbeitssprache:Charakteristika bilingualen Lernens in Österreich. Zs für InterkulturellenFremdsprachenunterricht (Online] 4(2) 14pp.http://www.ualberta.ca/~german/ejournal/

Achard, Michel and Susanne Niemeyer (eds.) 2004. Cognitive linguistics, second languageacquisition and foreign language teaching. Mouton de Gruyter.

Adamson, H.D. 1993. Academic competence. Theory and classroom practice – preparingESL students for content courses. New York: Longman.

Aljaafreh, A. and Lantolf, James P. 1994. Negative feedback as regulation andsecondlanguage learning in the Zone of Proximal Development. Modern Langauge Journal78, 465-483.

Allen, P., Fröhlich, M. & Spada, N. (1984). The communicative orientation of secondlanguage teaching: An observation scheme. In J. Handscombe, R. Orem and B. Taylor(eds.), On TESOL ‘83. Washington, D.C.

Allwright, Richard and Kathleen Bailey 1991. Focus on the language classroom : anintroduction to classroom research for language teachers Cambridge [u.a.] :Cambridge Univ. Press.

Annau, Eva. 2002. Border crossers. PFL-Englisch als Arbeitssprache (Pädagogik undFachdidaktik für LehrerInnen) Klagenfurt: IFF.

Appel, Joachim. 2003. Verbale Interaktion im Fremdsprachenunterricht. Paper presented atDGFF Kongress 2003, 1.-4- October Frankfurt Main.

252

Aston, Guy. 1986. Trouble shooting in Interaction with learners: the more the merrier?Applied Linguistics 7, 128-143.

Aston, Guy. 1988. Learning comity. An approach to the description and pedagogy ofinteractional speech. Bologna: Editrice CLUEB.

Aston, Guy. 1993. Notes on the interlanguage of comity. In Kasper and Blum-Kulka (eds.),224-250.

Atkinson, Dwight. 2002. Toward a Sociocognitive approache to second languageacquisition. Modern Language Journal 86, 525-545.

Atkinson, J.M. and J. Heritage (eds.) 1984. Structures of social action. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Babel, Helene. 1994. Von der Theorie zur Praxis. Widersprüche und Erfahrungen bei derUmsetzung eines Konzepts. In Hackl, Bernd. 1994. Forschung für die pädagogischePraxis. Wien: Österr. Studienverlag, 33-56.

Bach, Gerhard and Susanne Niemeier. (eds.) 2000. Bilingualer Utnerricht. Grundlagen,Methoden Praxis, Perpsektiven. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

Bachmann, Lyle and Adrian Palmer. 1996. Language testing in practice: designing anddeveloping useful language tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bachmann, Lyle. 1990. Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.

Baetens Beardsmore, Hugo. 1996. Reconciling content acquistion and language acquisitionin bilingual classrooms. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 17,114-122.

Bailey, Kathleen M. and David Nunan (eds.) 1996. Voices from the language classroom.Qualitative research in second language education. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.

Baker, Colin. 1993. Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism. Clevedon:Multilingual Matters.

Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen and Beverly Hartford. 1993. Learning the rules of academic talk:A longitudinal study of pragmatic change. Studies in Second Language Acquisition15, 279-304.

Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen and Beverly S. Hartford. 1996. Input in an institutional setting.Studies in Second language Acquisition 18, 171-188.

Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen and Tom Salsbury. 2004. The organisations of turns in thedisagreements of L2 learners: a longitudinal perspective. In Boxer Diana and AndrewCohen (eds.),199-227.

Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen. 2001. Evaluating the empirical evidence: Grounds for instructionin pragmatics? In Rose & Kasper (eds.), 12-32.

Barnes, D. & Todd, F. 1995. Communication and Learning Revisited: Making Meaningthrough Talk. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publishers, Inc.

Barnes, D. 1969. Language in the secondary classroom. In: D. Barnes, J. Britton, and H.Rosen (Eds.) Language, the learner and the school. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 11-77.

Bausch, Karl-Richard, Herbert Christ and Hans-Jürgen Krumm (eds.) 1995. HandbuchFremdsprachenunterricht. 3rd edition. Tübingen : Francke.

Bellack, A.A., Kliebard, H.M., Hyman R.T. and Smith F.L. 1966. The language of theclassroom. New York: Teachers’ College Press.

253

Berry, Margaret. 1981. Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis: a multi-layered approachto exchange structure. In Coulthard/Montgomery 1981, 120-145.

Bhatia, Vijay K 1993. Analysing genre : language use in professional settings. (Appliedlinguistics and language study) London [u.a.] : Longman.

Bhatia, Vijay K. 2002. Applied genre analysis: analytical advances and pedagogicalprocedures. In Ann Johns (ed.), 279-

Bhatia, Vijay K. 2004. Worlds of written discours : a genre-based view - London etc. :Continuum.

Bialystok, Ellen . 1990. Communication strategies : a psychological analysis of second-language use. Oxford: Blackwell.

Bialystok, Ellen. 1990. Communication strategies. A psychological analysis of second-language use. Oxford. Blackwells.

Biber, Douglas and Edward Finegan. 1989. ‘Styles of stance in English: Lexical andgrammatical marking of evidentiality and affect.’ Text 9: 93-124.

Biber, Douglas; Conrad, Susan; Reppen, Randi; Byrd, Pat; Helt, Marie 2002. Speaking andWriting in the University: A Multidimensional Comparison TESOL-Quarterly; 2002,36, 1, spring, 9-48.

Blum-Kulka, S. 1982. ‘Learning to say what you mean in a second language: A study of thespeech act performance of learners of Hebrew as a second language.’ AppliedLinguistics 3(1): 29-59.

Blum-Kulka, S. 1991. ‘Interlanguage pragmatics: The case of requests’ in R. Phillipson, E.Kellerman, M. Sharwood Smith and M. Swain (eds.): Foreign/second LanguagePedagogy Research. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Pp. 255-272.

Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, Gabriele Kasper (eds.) 1989. Cross-culturalpragmatics: requests and apologies. Norwood: Ablex.

Bonnet, Andreas. 2004. Chemie im bilingualen Unterricht. Kompetenzerwerb durchInteraktion. Opladen: Leske + budrich.

Borg, Simon. 2003. Teacher cognition in language teaching: a review of research on whatlanguage teachers think, know, believe and do. Language Teaching 36, 81-109.

Boxer, Diana and Andrew Cohen (eds.) 2004. Studying speaking to inform second languagelearning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Breidbach, Stephan, Gerhard Bach and Dieter Wolff (eds.) 2002. BilingualerSachfachunterricht: Didaktik, Lehrer-/Lernerforschung und Bildungspolitik zwischenTheorie und Empirie. Frankfurt: Lang.

Brinton, Donna, Marguerite Ann Snow and Marjorie B. Wesche. 1989. Content-basedsecond language instruction. New York: Newbury House.

Brock, C. 1986. The effect of referential questions on ESL classroom discourse. TesolQuarterly 20, 47-59.

Brown Gillian and George Yule. 1983. Discourse anlaysis. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.

Brown, G. and E.C. Wragg. 1993. Questioning. London: Routledge.

Brown, J.S., Collins, A. & Duguid, S. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.

254

Brown, Penelope, Levinson, Steven. 1978. Universals in language usage: politenessphenomena. In E. Goody (ed.) Questions and politeness. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 56-289.

Brown, Penelope, Levinson, Steven. 1987. Politeness: some universals in language usage.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brumfit, Christopher and Keith Johnson (eds.) 1979. The communicative approach tolanguage teaching. Oxford etc.: Oxford Univ. Press .

Bruner, Jerome S. 1966. Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA:HarvardUniversity Press.

Bruner, Jerome S. 1990. Acts of meaning Cambridge, Mass. [u.a.] : Harvard Univ. Press.

Burton, Deirdre. 1981. Analysing spoken discourse in Coulthard/Montgomery 1981, 61-81

Canale, M. & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to secondlanguage teaching and testing. Applied Lingusitics 1, 1-47.

Cazden, Courtney. 1988. Classroom discourse. (2nd edition 2001) Portsmouth, NH:Heineman.

Cazden, Courtney. 1995. New ideas for research on classroom discourse. TESOL Quarterly29: 384-386.

Cazden, C. & Beck, SW 2003. Classroom discourse. In A. Graesser, M. Gernsbacher, & S.Goldman (Eds.) Handbook of Discourse Processes (pp. 165-198).

Celce-Murcia, Marianne and Elite Olshtain.2000. Discourse and context in languageteaching. A guide for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chamot, Anna Uhl 1996. The cognitive academic language learning approach: Theoreticalframework and instructional applications. Georgetown Roundtable on Languages andLinguistics 1996, 108-115.

Chaudron, Craig. 1988. Second language classrooms. Research on teaching and learning.(Cambridge Applied Linguistics)

Christie, Frances. 2000. The language of classroom interaction and learning. In Unsworth(ed.), 184-205.

Christie, Frances. 2002. Classroom discourse analysis. A functional perspective. London,New York: Continuum.

CLIL Compendium, www.clilcompendium.com.

Coates, J. 1987. ‘Epistemic modality and spoken discourse.’ Transactions of thePhilological Society 1987: 110-131.

Cohen, Andrew, D. 1996. Developing the ability to perform speech acts. Studies in SecondLanguage Acquisition 18, 253-267.

Consolo, Douglas Altamira. 2000. Teachers’ action and student oral participation inclassroom interaction. In Hall & Verplaetse (eds.) 2000, 91-107.

Content-English, www.content-english.org.

Cook, Haruko Minegishi. 2001. Why can’t learners of JFL distinguish polite from implitespeech styles? In Rose & Kasper (eds.), 80-102.

Corder, S. P. 1983. Strategies of communication.In Faerch and Kasper eds., 193

Cots, J. M., Arno, E., Baiget, E., Irun, M., Llurda, E., & Nussbaum, L. 1998. Metalinguisticreflection in group work. Sintagma, 10, 81-105.

255

Coughlan, P. and Duff, Patricia. 1994. Same task, different activities: analysis of an SLAtask from an Activity Theory perspective. In Lantolf and Appel (eds.), 173-194.

Coulmas, Florian (ed.) 1981. Conversational routine. The Hague: Mouton.

Coulthard, Malcolm (ed.) 1992. Advances in spoken discourse analysis. London:Routledge.

Crandall, J and G.R. Tucker. 1990. Content-based instruction in second and foreignlanguage. In A. Padilla, H.H. Fairchild and C.M. Valadez (eds.) Foreign languageeducation. Issues and strategies. Newbury Park: Sage, 187-200.

Cummins, J. 1991. Conversational and academic language proficiency in bilingual context.AILA Review 8, 75-89.

Dalton-Puffer, Christiane.2002. Content and language integrated classrooms in Austria:applied linguistics takes a look. Vienna English Working Papers VIEWS 11-1.

Dalton-Puffer, Christiane.2002b Negotiating roles in classroom-based SLA/ELT research.Paper presented at Annual AAAL Conference, Salt Lake City, 6-9 April 2002.

Dalton-Puffer, Christiane.2003.Telling each other to do things in class: directives in contentand langauge integrated classrooms. VIEWS 12/1, 3-23. (downloadable underhttp://www.univie.ac.at/Anglistik/ang_new/online_papers/views.html)

Dalton-Puffer, Christiane 2004. Academic language functions in content and languageintegrated classrooms: defining and hypothesizing. VIEWS 13, 23-48.

Dalton-Puffer, Christiane 2005a. Negotiating interpersonal meanings in naturalisticclassroom disocurse: directives in Content and Lnaguage Integrated Classrooms. Toappear in Journal of Pragmatics

Dalton-Puffer, Christiane 2005b. Questions in CLIL classrooms: strategic questioning toencourage speaking. In: Alicia Martinez Flor and Esther Usó (eds.) New perspectiveson teaching the language processing skills. Castellón: Universidad Jaume I (in press)

Dalton-Puffer, Christiane and Tarja Nikula. 2004. Pragmatics of content-based instruction:teacher and stduent directives in Finnish and Austrian classrooms. Submitted toApplied Linguistics

Day, Elaine M. and Stan M. Shapson. 1996. Studies in immersion education. Clevedon:Multilingual Matters.

Day, R. Chenoweth, N.A. A. Chun, S. Luppescu. 1984. Repair techniques in native-non-native conversations. Language Learning 34, 19-45.

De Cillia, Rudolf. 1995. Österreichs Schulsprachenpolitik – eine “Sprachpolitik für das Jahr2000”? In Ruth Wodak and Rudolf de Cillia (eds.) Sprachenpolitik in Mittel- undOsteuropa. Wien: Passagen Verlag, 37-51.

Donato, R. 1994. Collective scaffolding in second langauge learning. In Lantolf J.P. and G.Appel (eds.) Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Norwood, NJ:Ablex PublishingCorporation, 33-56.

Döpke, Susanne. 1992. One parent. One language. An interactional approach. (Studies inBilingualism 3) Amsterdam,Philadelphia: Benjamins.

Doughty, Catherine. 1994. Finetuning of feedback by competent speakers to langauelearners. In J.Alatis (ed.) Strategic interaction and language acquisition: theory,practice and research. GURT 1993. Washington D.C: Georgetown University Press,96-108.

Douglas, Dan. 2004. Discourse domains: the cognitive context of speaking. In Boxer andCohen (eds.), 25-48.

256

Drew, Paul and John Heritage 1992. Analyzing talk at work: an introduction. In P. Drew andJ. Heritage (eds.) Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 3-65.

Duff, Patricia. 1995. An ethnography of communication in immersion classrooms inHungary. Kathryn A. Davis and Anne Lazaraton eds. Special-topic issue: Qualitativeresearch in ESOL. TESOL Quarterly 29: 505-538.

Duff, Patricia. 1996. Different languages, different practices: socialisation of discoursecompetence in dual-language school classrooms in Hungary. In: Kathleen M. Baileyand David Nunan (eds.) Voices from the language classroom. Qualitative research insecond language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 407-433.

Duff, Patricia. 1997. Immersion in Hungary: an EFK experiment. In R.K. Johnson and M.Swain (eds.) Immersion education: international perspectives. New York: CambridgeUniversity Press, 19-43.

Edmondson, Willis. 1986. Some ways in which the teacher brings errors into being. In:Kasper, Gabriele (ed.) 1986. Learning, teaching and communication in the ForeignLanguage classroom. Aarhus: Aarhus Univrsity Press.

Edwards, A.P. and D.P.G. Westgate. 1994. Investigating classroom talk. London andWashington D.C:: Falmer press. (2nd edition)

Edwards, D. and Mercer, N. 1987. Common Knowledge: the development of jointunderstanding in the classroom. London: Methuen.

Eggins, Suzanne 2000. Researching everyday talk. In Unsworth, L. ed., 130-151.

Eggins, Suzanne and Diana Slade. 1997. Analysing casual conversation. London: Cassell.

Eggins, Suzanne, P. Wignell and James R. Martin. 1993 The discourse of history: distancingthe recoverable past. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.) Register analysis: theory andpractice. London: Pinter, 75-109.

Ehlich, Konrad and Jochen Rehbein. 1986. Muster und Institution. Untersuchungen zurschulischen Kommunikation. Tübingen: Narr.

Ehlich, Konrad. 1991. Funktional-pragmatische Kommunikationsanalyse. Ziele undVerfahren. In Flader, Dieter (ed.) 1991. Verbale Interaktion: Studien zur Empirie undMethodologie der Pragmatik. Stuttgart. Metzler, 127-143.

Ehrlich, Susan, P. Avery and C. Yorio 1989. Discourse structure and the negotiation ofcomprehensible input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11, 397-414.

Eisenstein, Miriam and Jean Bodman. 1993. Expressing gratitude in American English.pp.64-81 In: Kasper and Blum-Kulka (eds.).

Ellis, R. 2001 (ed.) Investigating Form-Focused Instruction (=Language LearningSupplement).

Ellis, Rod. 1990. Instructed second language acquisition: learning in the classroom.Oxford: Blackwell.

Ellis, Rod. 1992. Learning to communicate in the classroom: a study of two learners’requests. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 14, 1-23.

Ellis, Rod. 1994. The study of second langauge acquisition. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.

Ellis, Rod. 1999. Learning a second language through interaction. (Studies in Bilingualism17). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.

257

Ernst, Gisela. 1994. “Talking circle: conversation and negotiation in the ESL classroom.TESOL Quarterly 28: 293-322.

EuroClic. www.euroclic.net

European Commission. 1996. White paper on teaching and learning: towards the learningsociety. (accessed 29 October 2004, http://www.ise.ee/docs/whitepaper.htm

Faerch, C. and G. Kasper. 1989. ‘Internal and external modification in interlanguage requestrealization’ in S. Blum-Kulka, J. House and G. Kasper (eds.) Cross-culturalPragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood NJ: Ablex., 221-247.

Faerch, Claus and Gabriele Kasper (eds.) 1983. Strategies in interlanguage communicationLondon: Longman

Faerch, Claus and Gabriele Kasper. 1983. Communication strategies in interlanguageproduction In: Faerch and Kasper eds.

Falsgraf C. and D. Majors. 1995. Implicit culture in Japanese immersion classroomdiscourse. Journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese 29, 1-21.

Felberbauer, Ernst M. 1996. Englisch als Arbeitssprache im Geographie- undWirtschaftskundeunterricht an AHS und BHS : ein neues Fachdidaktikkonzept desbilingualen Lernens für Europa. MA Thesis, University of Vienna.

Fiehler, Reinhard 1990. Kommunikation, Information und Sprache. Alltagsweltliche undwissenschaftliche Konzeptualisierungen und der Kampf um die Begriffe. In:Weingarten, Rüdiger (ed): Information ohne Kommunikation? Frankfurt: Fischer.

Field, Margaret. 1994. On the internalization of language and its use: some functionalmotivations for other-correction in children’s discourse. Pragmatics 4,2: 203-220.

Finocchiaro, Mary and Christopher Brumfit. 1983. The functional-notional approach : fromtheory to practice. Oxford : Oxford University Press.

Firth A. and J. Wagner 1997. On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamentalconcepts in SLA research. Modern Language Journal 81: 285-300.

Firth, A. 1996 The discursive accomplishment of normality: on “lingua franca”English andconversation analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 15, 253-264.

Fiske, John. 1990. Introduction to communication studies. 2. ed. London: Routledge.

Flanders, N.A. 1970. Analysing teacher behavior. Reading, MA.: Addison-Wesley.

Flick, Uw, Ernst von Kardoff, Ines Steinke (eds.) 2000. Qualitative Forschung. EinHandbuch. Rowohlts enzyklpädie. Reinbek bei Hamburg: rororo.

Flick, Uwe. 1995. Qualitative Forschung. Theorie, Methoden, Anwendung in Psychologieund Sozialwissenschaften. (rowohlts enzyklopädie). Reinbeck bei hamburg: Rowohlt.

Flowerdew, John. 2002. Genre in the classroom: a linguistic approach. In Ann Johns (ed.),91-102

Flowerdew, John and Lindsay Miller. 1995. On the notion of culture in L2 lectures. TESOLQuarterly 29-2: 345-373.

Flowerdew, John, David Li and Lindsay Miller. 1998. Attitudes towards English andCantonese among Hong Kong Chinese university lecturers. TESOL Quarterly 32,201-231.

Foster, Pauline 1998. A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. AppliedLinguistics 19, 1-23.

258

Foster, Pauline and Amy Ohta. 2002. Is the “negotiation of meaning model adequate todescribe L2 classroom interaction and develoment? Paper presented at AAAL AnnualConference, Salt Lake City, April 2002.

Friebertshäuser, Barbara (ed.) 1997. Handbuch Qualitative Forschungsmethoden in derErziehungswissenschaft.- Weinheim: Juventa-Verlag.

Fronaschütz, Susanne. 2003. Englisch als Arbeitssprache. Ergebnisse einer Umfrage unterLehrern und Schülern der HLT Wassermanngasse. Ms.

Fruhauf, Gianna. (ed.) 1996. Fremdsprache als Arbeitssprache in Sachfächern : Praxis undPerspektivenbilingualen Lehrens und Lernens in Europa .- Alkmaar : StichtingEuropees Platform voor het Nederlandse Onderwjis.

Gaies, Stephen J. 1983. Learner feedback: an exploratory study of its role in the secondlanguage classroom. In Seliger &Long eds. 1983, 190-212.

Garcia Mayo,Maria del Pilar, & Pica, T. (2000). L2 learner interaction in a foreign languagesetting: Are learning needs addressed? IRAL, 38(1), 35-58.

Gaskill, 1980. Correction in native speaker – non-native speaker conversation. In: DianeLarsen Freeman (ed.) 1980. Discourse analysis in seocnd language research.RowleyMass.: Newbury House,

Gass, Susan and Evangeline Varonis. 1985. Task variation and negotiation of meaning innon-native/non-native interactions in S. Gass and C. Madden eds. Input and secondlanguage acquisition Rowley Mass.: Newbury House, 149-162.

Gass, Susan M. and C. Madden (eds.) 1985. Input in second language acquisition. RowleyMA: Newbury House.

Gass, Susan, A. Mackey and T. Pica 1998. The role of input and interaction in secondlangague acquisition. Modern Language Journal 82, 299-307.

Gass, Susan. An interactionist perspective on second language acquisition. In: Robert B.Kaplan, ed. 2002. Oxford Handbook of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press, 170-181.

Gaulmyn, Marie Madeleine de. 1986. Learning to explain; Apprendre a expliquer. Travaux-neuchateloise-de-linguistique (TRANEL) 11, 119-139.

Gee, James Paul. 1992. The social mind. London: Bergin and Garvey.

Gee, James Paul. 1994. Discourses: reflections on MAK Halliday’s ‘Towards a Language-based theory of learning’. Linguistics and Education 6, 33-40.

Gee, James Paul. 1995. First langauge acquisition as a guide for theories of learning andpedagogy. Linguistics and Education 6, 331-354.

Genesee, Fred. 1987. Learning through two languages: studies of immersion and bilingualeducation. New York, NJ : Harper & Row.

Gergitsch, Margarete und Erika Kracher. 1999. Soll die EAA-Lehrerin auchEnglischlehrerin sein? (PFL EAA 12). Klagenfurt: IFF.Schule und gesellschaftlichesLernen.

Gierlinger Erwin. 2002. Fremdsprache als Arbeitssprache in Österreich: Situation undPerspektive (Comenius 2.1 project http://www.pze.at/memo (14 July 2004)

Givon, T. 1979. From discourse to syntax: grammar as a processing strategy. In Givon T.(ed.) Syntax and semantics. Volume 12. New York: Academic Press.

Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction ritual. New York: Pantheon.

259

Gogolin, Ingrid. 1994. Der monolinguale Habitus der multilingualen Schule. Münster/NewYork: Waxmann.

Golombek, Paula. 1994. Putting teachers back into teachers’ knowledge. TESOL Quarterly28: 404-407.

Grabe, W. and F. Stoller. 1997. Content based instruction: research foundations. In M.A.Snow and D.M. Brinton (eds.) The content based classroom: perspectives onintegrating language and content. New York: Longman, 158-174.

Green, Judith and Carol N. Dixon. 2002. Exploring differences in perspective onmicroanlaysis of classroom discourse: contributions and concerns. AppliedLinguistics 23,3: 393-406.

Gregg, Kevin. 1984. Krashen’s monitor and Occam’s razor. Applied Linguistics 5, 79-100.

Griffin, Peg and Hugh Mehan. 1981. Sense and ritual in classroom discourse. In FlorianCoulmas ed., Conversational routine. The Hague: Mouton, 187-213.

Grotjahn, Rüdiger. 1998. Subjektive Theorien in der Fremdsprachenforschung.Methodologische Grundlagen und Perspektiven. Fremdsprachen lehren und lernen27, 33-59.

Hajer, Maaike. 2000. Creating a langauge-promoting classroom: content-area teachers atwork. In: Hall and Verplaetse (eds.), 265-285.

Hall, Joan Kelly 2004. “Practicing speaking” in Spanish: Lessons from a High SchoolForeign langauge classroom. In Boxer and Cohen eds., 68-87.

Hall, Joan Kelly and Lorrie Stoops Verplaetse (eds.) 2000. Second an foreign languagelearning through classroom interaction. Mahwah N.J. and London: LawrenceErlbaum Associates.

Hall, Joan Kelly. 1993. The role of oral practices in the accomplishment of our everydaylives: the sociocultural dimension of interaction with implications for the learning ofanother language. Applied Linguistics 14, 145-166.

Hall, Joan Kelly. 1998. Differential teacher attention to student utterances: the constructionof different opportnities for learning in the IRF. Linguistics and Education 9, 287-311.

Hallet, Wolfgang. 2002. Auf dem Weg zu einer bilingualen Sachfachdidaktik. BilingualesLernen als fremdsprachige Konstruktion wissenschaftlicher Begriffe. Praxis desneusprachlichen Unterrichts 49, 115 - 126.

Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd ed. London: Arnold

Halliday, M.A.K. 1978. Language as social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M.A.K. 1993. Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics andEducation 5, 93-116.

Halliday, Michael A. and James R. Martin.1993.Writing science: literacy and discursive power (Critical perspectives on literacy andeducation ) London : Falmer Press.

Harley, Birgit, Patrick Allen, Jim Cummins, Merrill Swain. 1990. The development ofsecond language proficiency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hatch, Evelyn. 1992. Discourse and language education. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.

260

He, A. W. 2000. ‘The grammatical and interactional organization of teacher’s directives:implications for socialization of Chinese American children.’ Linguistics andEducation 11, 119-140.

Heras, Ana Inés. 1994. The construction of understanding in a sixth-grade bilingualclassroom. Linguistics and Education 5, 275-299.

Holmes, J. 1990. ‘Hedges and boosters in women’s and men’s speech.’ Language andCommunication 10: 185-205.

House, Juliane and Gabriele Kasper. 1981b.Politeness markers in English and German. InFlorian Coulmas (ed.) Conversational routine: Explorations in standardizedcommunication situations and prepatterned speech. The Hague: Mouton, 157-185.

House, Juliane. 1986. Learning to talk talking to learn. And investigation of learnerperformance in two types of discourse. In: Kasper ed., 43-57

House, Juliane. 1996. Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a foreign language.Routines and metapragmatic awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18,225-252.

Hüttner, Julia and Angelika Rieder. 2003. Once upon a time there was a boy, he has a dogand a frog: Erzählverhalten jugendlicher FremdsprachenlernerInnen. Paper presentedat the ÖLT 2003. Leopold-Franzens Universität Innsbruck.

Hüttner, Julia. 2005. Extended genre analysis: structures in student academic writing. Ph.D.University of Vienna.

Hymes, Dell 1972. On communicative competence. In J.B. Pride and J. Holmes (eds.).Sociolinguistics: selected readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 269-293.

Hymes, Dell. 1974. Foundations in sociolinguistics. An ethnographic approach.Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Hymes, Dell. 1992. The concept of communicative competence revisted: M. Pütz (ed.)Thirty years of linguistic evolution: studies in honour of Rene Dirven on the occasionof his sixtieth birthday. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 31-57.

Iedema, Rick. 1996. ‘Save the talk for after the listening’: the realisation of regulativediscoures in teacher talk. Langauge and Education 10, 82-103.

Jarvis, Jennifer and Mark Robinson. 1997. Analysing educational discourse: an exploratorystudy of teacher response and support to pupils’ learning. Applied Linguistics 17: 212-228.

Jefferson, G., J.R.E. Lee 1981. The rejection of advice: managing the problematicconvergence of a “TroublesTelling” and a “Service Encounter” Journal ofPragmatics 5, 399-422.

Jefferson, Gail 1987. On exposed and embedded correction in Conversation in Button G.and Lee J. (eds.) Talk and social organisation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Johns, Ann M. (ed.) 2002. Genre in the classroom. Multiple perspectives.Mahwah, N.J.;London: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Jordan, Geoff. 2004. Theory construction in second language acquisition. Amsterdam etc. :Benjamins.

Jung-Euen-Hyuk, Sarah. 1999.The organization of second language classroom repairIssues-in-Applied-Linguistics 10, 153-171.

Kachru, Braj B. .1990. The alchemy of English. University of Illinois: Illini Books

Kachru, Braj B. 1990. World Englishes and applied linguistics. World Englishes 9, 2-20.

261

Kanagy, Ruth. 1999. Interactional routines as a mechanism forL2 acquisition andsocialization in an immersion context. Journal of Pragmatics 31, 1467-1492.

Kasper, Gabriele. (ed.) 1986. Learning teaching and communication in the foreign languageclassroom. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.

Kasper, Gabriele. 1986a. Repair in foreign language teaching. In Kasper ed., 23-41 also:Studies in Second language Acquisition 7:2 (1985)

Kasper, Gabriele. 1997. A stands for acquisition. A response to Firth and Wagner. ModernLanguage Journal 81, 307-312.

Kasper, Gabriele. 2001. Classroom research on interlanguage pragmatics. In Rose andKasper (eds.), 33-60.

Kasper, Gabriele and Kenneth Rose. 2001 Pragmatics in language teaching. In Rose andKasper (eds.), 1-9.

Kasper, Gabriele and Shoshana Blum-Kulka. 1993. Interlanguage pragmatics. Oxford:Oxford University Press.

Keller, Eric. 1981. Gambits: conversational strategy signals. In: Coulmas ed. 93-113.

Kellerman, Eric, T. Bongaerts and Nanda Poulisse. 1987. Strategy and system in L2referential communication. In R. Ellis (ed.) The social context of second langaugeacquisition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Kidd, Richard. 1996. Teaching academic language functions at the secondary level.Canadian Modern Langauge Review 52,2: 285-307

Kinginger, Celeste S. and Sandra J Savignon. 1991. Four conversations: task variation andclassroom learner discourse. In McGroarty, Mary E. and Christiane J Faltis (eds.)1991. Language in school and society. Policy and pedagogy. Berlin etc. : Mouton deGruyter, 85-105.

Koester, Almut J. 2002. The performance of speech acts in workplace conversations and theteaching of communicative functions. System 30/2, 167-184.

Konishi, Koji and Elaine Tarone. 2004. English constructions used in compensatorystrategies: baseline data forcommunicative EFL instruction. In: Boxer and Cohen eds.,174-198

Kramsch, Claire J. 1981. Discourse analysis and second language teaching Washington,DC : Center for Applied Linguistics (Language in education 37).

Krashen, Stephen D. 1981. Second language acquisition and second language learning.Oxford: Pergamon.

Krashen, Stephen D. 1982. Principles and practice in second language acqusistion. Oxford:pergamon.

Krashen, Stephen D. 1985. The input hypothesis. London: Longman.

Krashen, Stephen D. and Stephen Terrell. 1983. The natural approach: languageacquisition in the classroom. Hayward, CA: Alemany Press.

Krechel, Hans-Ludwig. 1999. Methodological aspects of content-based language work inbilingual education. In Mißler Bettina and Uwe Multhaup (eds.) The construction ofknowledge, learner autonomy and related issues in foreign language learning :essays in honour of Dieter Wolff. Tübingen: Stauffenburg-Verlag, 193-202.

Krueger, Merle & Frank Ryan (eds). 1993. Language and content. Discipline- and content-based approaches to language study. MA: Heath and Company.

262

Kvale, Steinar. 1996. InterViews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing.Thousand Oaks, Calif. [etc.] : Sage.

Lamsfuß-Schenk, Stefanie. 2000. Fremdverstehen im bilingualen Geschichtsunterricht.Beobachtungen aus dem Unterricht und Verbesserungsvorschläge für erfolgreichenSachfachunterricht. Neusprachliche Mitteilungen 53/2, 74-80.

Lamsfuß-Schenk, Stefanie und Dieter Wolff. 1999. Bilingualer Sachfachunterricht: fünfkritische Anmerkungen zum State of the Art. Zeitschrift für InterkulturellenFremdsprachenunterricht [online] 4(2),www.ualberta.ca/~Germand/ejournal/lamsfus2.htm

Lantolf, James P. 1993. Sociocultural theory and the second-language classroom: the lessonof Strategic Interaction. In James Alatis (ed.) Georgetown Roundtable on Languagesand Linguistics 1993. Washington, DC : Georgetown University Press, 220-233.

Lantolf, James P. 1994. Sociocultural Theory and second language learning. Introduction tothe special issue. The Modern Language Journal 78, 418-420.

Lantolf, James P. 2002. Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. In Robert B.Kaplan, ed. 2002. Oxford Handbook of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press, 104-114

Lantolf, James P. and Aneta Pavlenko. 1995. Sociocultural theory and second languageacquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 15, 108-124.

Lapkin, S. (ed.). 1998. French as a second language education in Canada: Recent empiricalstudies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Lave, Jean and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated learning. Legitimate peripheralparticipation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.

Lemke, Jay. 1989. Using Language in the classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lemke, Jay L. 1990. Talking science, language, learning, and values. Ablex Publishing,Norwood, NJ..

Lerner, Gene H. 1995. Turn design and the organisation of participation in instrucitonalactivities. Discourse Processes 19, 111-131.

Levelt, Willem. 1989. Speaking. From intention to articulation. Cambridge Mass.: MITPress.

Liddicoat, A. 1997. Interaction, social structure andsecond language use: A response to Firthand Wagner. The Modern Language Journal 81, 313-317.

Liebscher, Grit and Jennifer O’Cain 2003. Conversational repair as role-defining mechanismin classroom interaction. Modern Language Journal 87, 375-390.

Liskin-Gasparro, Judith E. 1998. Linguistic development in an immersion context: howadvanced learners of Spanish perceive SLA. The Modern Language Journal 82: 159-175.

LoCastro, V. 1997. Politeness and pragmatic competence in foreign language education.Language Teaching Research 1, 239-267.

Long, Michael, 1981b. Input, interaction and second language acquisition. In Winitz, H (ed.)Native langaue and foreign language acquisistion. Annals of the New York Academyof Sciences 379, 259-278.

Long, Michael. 1981. Questions in foreigner talk discourse. Language Learning 31, 135-157

263

Long, Michael. 1983a. Linguistic and conversational adjustment to non-native speakers.Studies in Second language Acquisition 5, 177-193.

Long, Michael. 1983b. Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiationof comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics 4, 126-141.

Long, Michael. 1985. Input and second language acquisition theory. In: Gass, S. and C.G.Madden (eds.), 377-393.

Long, Michael H. 1996. The role of the linguistic environment in second languageacquisition. In.Ritchie and Bhatia (eds.), chapter 13; 413-468.

Long, Michael H. and Porter P.A. 1985. Group work, interlanguage talk and secondlanguage acquisition. TESOL Quarterly 19, 207-227.

Long, Michael and Charlene J. Sato. 1983. Classroom foreigner talk discourse: forms andfunctions of teachers’ questions. In Seliger & Long (eds.), 268-286.

Lörscher, Wolfgang. 1986. Conversational structures in the foreign language classroom. In:Kasper, Gabriele (ed.), 11-22.

Lörscher, Wolfgang and Rainer Schulze. 1988. On polite speaking and foreign languageclassroom discourse. IRAL 26, 183-199.

Lyster, Roy. 1998. Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to errortypes and learner repair in immersion classrooms Language Learning 48: 183-218.

Lyster, Roy. 2004. Conference Plenary abstract. Achieving good practice in in CLIL andImmersion Education Conference. Kokkola (Finland) 11-13 November 2004.(http://www.immersionconference.kokkola.fi; accessed May 2004)

Lyster, Roy , Patsy M. Lightbown, and Nina Spada.1999. A response to Truscott’s ‘What’swrong with oral grammar correction.’. Canadian Modern Language Review 55 457-67.

Lyster, Roy and Leila Ranta. 1997. Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Negotiation ofform in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19, 37-66.

Mackey, Alison and Jenefer Philp.1998. Conversational interaction and second languagedevelopment: recasts, responses, and red herrings? The Modern Language Journal 82:338-356

Malamah-Thomas, Ann. 1987. Classroom interaction. The roles of teachers and learners.Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Markee, Numa. 1994. Toward an ethnomethodological respecification of second languageacqusisition studies. In Elaine Tarone, Susan Gass and Andrew Cohen (eds.)Research methodology in second language acquisition. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 89-116.

Markee, Numa. 1995. Teachers’ answers to students’ questions: Problematizing the issue ofmaking meaning. Issues in Applied Linguistics 6, 63-92.

Markee, Numa. 2000. Conversation analysis. Mahwah, N.J, London: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Marsh, D. and B. Marsland. (eds.) 1999. CLIL Initiatives for the Millenium: Report on theCEILINK Think Tank. Continuing Education Centre: Jyväskylä.

Marsh, David, B. Marsland and A. Maljers. (eds.) 1998. Future scenarios in Content andLanguage Integrated Learning. Continuing Education Centre: Jyväskylä.

Marsh, David, B. Marsland and, T. Nikula. (eds.) 1997. Aspects of implementingplurilingual education. Continuing Education Centre: Jyväskylä.

264

Marsh, David.and Gisella Langé (eds.) 1999. Implementing Content and languageIntegrated Learning. A research-driven TIE-CLIL Foundation Course Reader.Continuing Education Centre: Jyväskylä.

Martin, James R. 1989. Factual writing: exploring and challenging social reality. 2nd ed.Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Mayring, Philipp. 2002. Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung. 5th edition.Weinheim: Beltz.

McClelland J and Rumelhart D. (eds.) 1986. Parallel distributed processing: explorationsin the microstructure of cognition. 2 vols.Cambridge, MA MIT Press.

McCormick, Dawn and Richard Donato. 2000. Teacher questions as scaffolded assistance inan ESL classroom. In Hall, Joan Kelly and Lorrie-Stoops Verplaetse (eds.). Secondand foreign language learning through classroom interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum,183-201.

McHoul, A.W. 1990. The organization of repair in classroom talk. Languge in Society 19,349-377.

Measures, Elizabeth, Carsten Quell and Gordon Wells. 1997. A sociocultural perspective onclassroom discourse. In Davies and Corson eds. Encyclopedia of language andeducation, 21-29.

Mehan, Hugh. 1979. Learning lessons: social organization in the classroom. Harvard:Harvard University Press.

Mehan, Hugh. 1985. The structure of classroom discourse. In Handbook of discourseanalysis vol.3. Discourse and dialogue. Ed. By Teun van Dijk. London: AcademicPress.

Meier, Ardith J. 1995. ‘Passages of politeness.’ Journal of Pragmatics 24: 381-392.

Meier, Ardith J. 2004. Has ‘politness’ outlived its usefulness? VIEWS 13, 5-22.

Menz, Florian 1998. Verständigungsprobleme in Wirtschaftsunternehmen. Zum Einfluß vonunterschiedlichen Konzeptualisierungen auf die betriebsinterne Kommunikation. In:Fiehler, Reinhard (ed) Verständigungsprobleme und gestörte Kommunikation. Opladen:Westdeutscher Verlag: 134-154.

Mercer, Neil 1995. The guided construction of knowledge. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Mercer, Neil 1996. Language and the guided construction of knowledge. In: Blue G andMitchell, Rosamond (eds.) Language in education. Clevedon: BAAL/MultilingualMatters, 28-40.

Mercer, Neil. 1999. Classroom language. In: Spolsky (ed.) 315-319.

Mey, Jacob L. 2001. Pragmatics. An introduction. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwells.

MICASE – Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English.www.hti.umich.edu/m/micase/index.html

Mitchell, Rosamond and Florence Myles. 1998. Second language learning theories. London: Arnold.

Mohan, Bernard and Gulbahar H. Beckett. 2003. A functional approach to research oncontent-based language learning: recasts in causal explanations. Modern LanguageJournal 87, 421-432. Appeared before in Canadian Modern Language Review 58,133-155.

265

Mori, Junko. 2002. Task design, plan and development of talk-in-interaction: an analysis ofa small group activity in a Japanese language Classroom. Applied Linguistics 23/3,323-347.

Mühlmann, H. and E. Otten 1991. Bilinguale deutsch-englische Bildungsgänge anGymnasien – Diskussion didaktisch-methodischer Probleme. Die NeuerenSprachen90, 2-23.

Müller-Hartmann, Andreas and Marita Schocker von Ditfurth (eds.) 2001. QualitativeForschung im Bereich Fremdsprachen lehren und lernen. Tübingen: Gunter NarrVerlag.

Musayeva, Gülsen. 1998. Corrective discourse in Turkish EFL classrooms. InternationalReview of Applied Linguistics 36, 137-160.

Musumeci, Diane. 1996. Teacher-learner negotiation in content-based instruction:communication at cross-purposes? Applied Linguistics 17: 286-325.

Nassaji, Hossein and Gordon Wells 2000. What’s the use of ‘Triadic Dialogue’ ?: Aninvestigation of teacher-student itneraction. Applied Linguistics 21,2: 376-406

Nation, Paul. 2001. Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.

Neusprachliche Mitteilungen aus Wissenschaft und Praxis Special Issues 49, 51 55 (1996,1998, 2002)

Nikula, Tarja. 1996. Pragmatic force modifiers. Astudy in interlanguage pragmatics.(Studia Philologica Jyväskyläensia 39) Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.

Nikula, Tarja. 2002. Teacher talk reflecting pragmatic awareness: a look at EFL andcontent-based classrooms. Pragmatics12, 447-468

Nisbet, J 1990. Teaching thinking: an introduction to the researhc literature. (Spotlight no.26.) Edinburgh : SCRE:

Nofsinger, J. 1991. Everyday conversation. Newbury Park: Sage.

Nunan, David. 1991. Communicative Tasks and the Language Curriculum.TESOL-Quarterly 25, 279-295.

Nunan, David. 1996. Issues in second language acquisition research: examining substanceand procedure. In: William C. Ritchie and Tej. K. Bhatia (eds.) Handbook of secondlanguage acquisition. New York. Academic Press. 349-374.

Nystrand, M. 1997.Opening dialogue: understanding the dynamics of language andlearning in the English classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.

Nystrand, M., L. Wu, A. Gamoran, S. Zeiser and D. Long. 2001. Questions in Time:Investigating the Structure and Dynamics of Unfolding Classroom Discourse. CELAResearch Report No. 14005. http://cela.albany.edu./nystrand01-5/main.html

Nystrom Johnson, Nancy. 1983. Teacher-student interaction in billingual classrooms: fourapproaches to error feedback. In Seliger & Long eds.

O’Malley, J. Michael and Anna Uhl Chamot. 1990. Learning strategies in second languageacquisition. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press .

Oestreich, Katja and Günther Grogger. 1997. Der Einsatz einer Fremdsprache alsArbeitssprache in nichtsprachlichen Gegenständen: Ergebnisse einer bundesweitenSchulleiterbefragung an Schulen der Sekundarstufe im Schuljahr 1996/97. Graz ;Wien : Zentrum für Schulentwicklung,

266

Ohta, Amy Snyder. 1999. Interactional routines and the socalization of interactional style inadult learners of Japanese Journal of Pragmatics 31, 1493-1512.

Oliver, Rondha. 1995. Negative feedback in child NS-NNS conversation. Studies inSecondlanguage Acquisition 17, 459-481.

Palmer, Adrian. 1992. Issues in evaluating input-based language teaching programs. In: J.Charles Alderson and Alan Beretta (eds.) Evaluating second language education.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 141-166.

Paltridge, Brian. 2001. Genre and the language learning classroom. Ann Arbor, Mich. :Univ. of Michigan Press.

Pawley, A., & Syder, F. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Native-like selection andnative-like fluency. In J. Richards & R. Schmidt (eds.), Language and communication(pp. 191-226). London: Longman.

Peter, Karin. 2000. Englisch als Arbeitssprache im Fachbereich „Geographie“ anHandelsakademien. Phil.Diss. Innsbruck University.

Pica, Teresa. 1994. Questions from the language classroom: research perspectives. TESOLQuarterly 28, 49-78

Pica, Teresa. 1994. Research on negotiation: what does it reveal about second-langugeleanring conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning 44, 493-527.

Pica, Tersa. 2002. Subject-matter content: How does it assist the interactional and linguisticneeds of classroom langaue learners. Modern Language Journal 86, 1-19.

Pietschmann, Herbert. 2002. Quantenmechanik verstehen. Heidelberg: Springer.

Poole, Deborah. 1990. Contextualizing IRE in an Eighth—grade quiz review. Linguisticsand Education 2, 185-211.

Poole, Deborah. 1992. Language socialization in the second language classroom LanguageLearning 42, 593-616.

Poole, Deborah 2002. Discourse analysis and applied linguistics. In Robert B. Kaplan, ed.2002. Oxford Handbook of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 73-84.

Postman, Neil. 1979. Teaching as a conservative activity. New York: Laurel Press.

Poulisse, Nanda 1994 Communication strategies. In: Asher, Robert ed. The encyclopedia oflanguage and linguistics. Oxford [u.a.] : Pergamon Press

Read, Julia. 1996. Recent developments in Australian late immersion language education.Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 17, 469-484.

Redder, Angelika. 1984. Modalverben im Unterrichtsdiskurs. Pragmatik der Modalverbenam Beispiel eines institutionellen Diskurses. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

Reddy, M.J. (1979): The conduit metaphor – A case of frame conflict in our language aboutlanguage. In Ortony, Andrew (ed): Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: CUP.

Rehbein, Jochen. 1988. Ausgewählte Aspekte der Pragmatik. In. Ludger Hoffmann (ed.)1996. Sprachwissenschaft. Ein Reader. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 106-131.

Richards, Jack and Charles Lockhart. 1994. Reflective teaching in second languageclassrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rindler Schjerve, Rosita (ed.) 2003. Diglossia and power : language policies and practicein the 19th century Habsburg Empire. Berling etc.: Mouton de Gruyter.

267

Rintell, Ellen M. and Candace J. Mitchell. 1989. Studying requests and apologies: AnInquiry into method. In S. Blum-Kulka, Juliane House and Gabriele Kasper (eds.)Cross cultural pragmatics, 248-272.

Ritchie, William, C. and Tej Kk. Bhatia. 1996 Handbook of second language acquisition.San Diego etc.: Academic Press.

Romaine, Suzanne. 1989. Bilingualism. Oxford: Blackwell.

Rose, Kenneth and Gabriele Kasper (eds.) 2001. Pragmatics in language teaching.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel Schegloff and Gail Jefferson 1974. A simplest systematics for theorganization of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50, 696-735.

Saville-Troike 1982. The ethnography of communication; an introduction. Oxford:Blackwell.

Schachter, Jacquelyn and Susan Gass (eds.) 1996. Second Language Classroom Research.Issues and opportunities.Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schank, R and R. Abelson. 1977. Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, N.J.:Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schegloff, E. A. 1992b. On talk and its institutional occasions. In Paul Drew and JohnHeritage (eds.) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Pp. 101-134.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1992. Repair after next turn: the last strcuturally provided defense ofintersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology 97, 1295-1345

Schegloff, Emanuel., Gail Jefferson and Harvey Sacks. 1977. The preference for self-correction in the organisation of repair in conversation. Language 53, 361-382.

Schiffrin, Deborah. 1994. Approaches to discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.

Schinke-Llano, Linda A. 1983. Foreigner talk in content classrooms. In: Seliger & Longeds., 146-164.

Schmid, Barbara. 2000. Englisch als Arbeitssprache : bedeutet die zunehmende bilingualeErziehung einen Substanzverlust im Sachfach? Ein Praxisbericht aus Geografie-undWirtschaftskunde.Diplomarbeit Universität Wien.

Schwartz, Joan. 1980. The negotiation for meaning: repair in conversations between secondlanguage learners of English. In. Diane Larsen Freeman (ed.) 1980. Discourseanalysis in seocnd language research.Rowley Mass.: Newbury House, 138-153.

Searle, John R.1969 Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Seedhouse, Paul. 1998. ‘CA and the Analysis of Foreign Language Interaction: A Reply toWagner’ Journal of Pragmatics 30: 85-102.

Seedhouse, Paul. 1999. ‘The Relationship between Context and the Organisation of Repairin the L2 Classroom’ International Review of Applied Linguistics 37, 59-80.

Seedhouse, Paul. 1997. The case of missing “no”: the relationship between pedagogy andinteraction. Language Learning 47: 547-583.

Seidenberg, M.S. 1996. language acquisition and use: learning and applying probabilisticconstraints. Science 275, 1599-1603.

Seidlhofer, Barbara. 2002. ‘The shape of things to come? Some basic questions about Eng-lish as a lingua franca’ in K. Knapp & C. Meierkord (eds.): Lingua Franca Commu-nication. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. Pp. 269-302.

268

Seidlhofer, Barbara. 2000. Mind the gap: English as a mother tongue vs. English as a linguafranca. VIEWS 9-1:51-68.

Seliger, Herbert W. and Long, Michael H. (eds.) 1983. Classroom oriented research insecond language acquisition. Rowley Mass. London Tokyo: Newbury House.

Shannon, Claude and Warren Weaver. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication.Univ. of Illinois Press.

Shomoossi, Nematullah. 2004. The effect of teachers’ questioning behavior on EFLclassroom interaction: A classroom research study. The Reading Matrix 4/2, 96-104.

Short, Deborah J. 1993. Assessing integrated language and content instruction. TESOLQuarterly 27: 627-656.

Short, Deborah J., 1991. How to integrate language and content instruction: a trainingmanual. Los Angeles: Center for language Education and Research, UCLA. Secondedition.

Sinclair, John and Malcolm Coulthard. 1975. Towards an analysis of discourse: the Englishused by teachers and pupils. Oxford: oxford University Press.

Sinclair, John and Malcolm Coulthard. 1992. Towards an analysis of discourse. InCoulthard, Malcolm.(ed.) 1992. Advances in spoken discourse analysis. London:Routledge, 1-34

Smit, Ute. 2004. Multilingual Vienna. The roles English plays. VIEWS 13, 69-87.(downloadable fromhttp://www.univie.ac.at/Anglistik/ang_new/online_papers/views.html

Smit,Ute. 2003. English as Lingua Franca (ELF) as Medium of Learning in a HotelManagement Educational Program: an applied linguistic approach VIEWS 12/2, 40-74.

Snow, Catherine E. 1987. Beyond conversation: second language learners’ acquisition ofdescription and explanation. In: Lantolf, James P. and Angela Labarca (eds.) 1987.Research in second language learning : focus on the classroom : proceedings of the6th Delaware Symposium on Language Studies, October 1984. Norwood: Ablex, p.3-16.

Snow, Marguerite Ann and Donna M. Brinton eds. 1997. The content based classroomPerspectives on integrating language and content. White Plains: Longman.

Snow, Marguerite Ann, Myriam Met and Fred Genesee. 1989. A conceptual framework forthe integration of language and content in second/foreign language instruction.TESOL Quarterly 23: 201-217

Snow, Marguerite Ann. 1998. Trends and issues in content-based instruction. AnnualReview of Applied Linguistics 18, 243-267.

Spada, N. & Fröhlich, M. (1995). The Communicative Orientation of Language TeachingObservation Scheme (COLT). The National Centre for English Language Teachingand Research (NCELTR). Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

Spada, Nina and Patricia Lightbown 1993. Instruction and the development of questions inL2 classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15, 204-24.

Spada, Nina. 1994. Classroom interaction analysis. In Alister Cumming ed. CummingAlister ed. Alternatives in TESOL Research TESOL QU. 28-4:685-688.

Spradley, James P.1979. The ethnographic interview. Fort Worth, Tex. [u.a.] : Holt,Rinehart & Winston.

269

Staudner, Andrea. 1999a. “Wenn Katholen und Evangelisten geminsam einen Gottesdienst”Eine kritische Auseinandersetung mit dem Konzept “Englisch als Arbeitssprache” insieben Teilen. (PFL EAA 13). Klagenfurt: IFF.Schule und gesellschaftliches Lernen.

Staudner, Andrea. 1999a. “Wenn Katholen und Evangelisten geminsam einen Gottesdienst”Eine kritische Auseinandersetung mit dem Konzept “Englisch als Arbeitssprache” insieben Teilen. (PFL EAA 13). Klagenfurt: IFF.Schule und gesellschaftliches Lernen.

Staudner, Andrea. 1999b. Von der Erforschung der Schulangst zur Bekämpfung derLangeweile. Untersuchungen zur Befindlichkeit meinr SchülerInnen imenglischsprachigen Geschichtsunterricht. (PFL EAA 8) Klagenfurt: IFF.Schule undgesellschaftliches Lernen

Staudner, Andrea. 1999b. Von der Erforschung der Schulangst zur Bekämpfung derLangeweile. Untersuchungen zur Befindlichkeit meinr SchülerInnen imenglischsprachigen Geschichtsunterricht. (PFL EAA 8) Klagenfurt: IFF.Schule undgesellschaftliches Lernen.

Stern, Otto, Birgit Eriksson, Christine LePape Racine, Hans Reutener, Cecilia Serra Oesch.1998. Zweisprachiger Unterricht Sprachenkonzept Schweiz. Anhang 13: Französisch-Deutsch: Zweisprachiges Lernen auf der Sekundarstufe I (Umsetzungsbericht). Bernund Aarau. Nationales Forschungsprogramm 33 (SKFB)

Strauss, Anselm L. and Juliet Corbin. 1990. Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park,Calif.: Sage Publications.

Stubbs, Michael. 1983. Discourse analysis. The sociolinguistic analysis of naturallanguage. Oxford. Blackwell.

Stubbs, Michael. 1983. Language, schools and classrooms. 2nd ed. London, New York.Methuen.

Suhor, Charles. 1984. Thinking skills in English and across the Curriculum. ERIC Digest.ERIC Lcearinghouse on Reading and Communicatin Skills Urbana IL, ERIC No. ED250 693)

Suhor, Charles. 1984. Thinking skills in English and across the Curriculum. ERIC Digest.ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills. Urbana IL, ERIC No.ED 250 693)

Swain, Merril. 1985. Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input andcomprehensible output in its development. In: S. Gass and C.G. Madden.(eds.) Inputin the second language classroom. Rowley MA: Newbury House, 235-252

Swain, Merril. 1995. Three functions of output in second language learning. In: Guy Cookand Barbara Seidlhofer eds. Principle and practice in applied linguistics. Studies inhonour of H.G. Widdowson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 125-144.

Swain, Merrill. 1996. Discovering successful second language teaching strategies andpractices: from programme evaluation to classroom experimentation. Journal ofMultilingual and Multicultural Development 17: 89-104.

Swain, Merrill. 2000. The output hypothesis and beyond: mediating acquisition throughcollaborative dialogue. In Lantolf, James P. (ed.) Sociocultural theory and secondlanguage learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 97-114.

Swain, Merrill and Sharon Lapkin. 1995. Problems in output and the cognitive porcessesthey generate: a step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics 16, 371-391

270

Swain, Merrill and Sharon Lapkin. 1998. Interaction and second language learning: twoadolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern LanguageJournal 82, 320-337.

Swales, John M. and Christine Feak. 1994. Academic writing for graduate students.Essential skills and tasks. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Swales, John. 1990. Genre analysis. English in academicand research settings. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Takahashi, Tomoko and Leslie M. Beebe. 1993. Cross-linguistc influence in the speech actof correction. In: Kasper and Blum-Kulka eds. , 138-160.

Tarone, Elaine. 1983. Some thoughts on the notion of ‘communication strategy’ In Faerchand Kasper (eds.), 61-74.

Tarone, Elaine and Merrill Swain. 1995. A sociolinguistic perspective on second languageuse in immersion classrooms. The Modern Language Journal 79, 166-178.

Ten Have, Paul. 1999. Doing conversation analysis: a practical guide. London [u.a.] : SagePubl.

TESOL Research agenda 2000. http://www.tesol.org/assoc/bd/0006researchagenda01.html[accessed Feb 02]

Tharp, R.G. and R. Gallimore. 1988. Rousing minds to life: teaching, learning andschooling in social context. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Themenheft Erziehung und Unterricht 151 (2001) Schulprofile der bilingualen Schulen inÖsterreich.

Thomas, Jenny. 1983. Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics 4, 91-112.

Trentini, Lukas. 2000. Geographie und Wirtschaftskunde mit Englisch als Arbeitssprache :Voraussetzungen für Lehrende an AHS und BHS. Dipl. Arb. University of Innsbruck.

Trosborg, Anna. 1995. Interlanguage pragmatics: requests, complaints and apologies.Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Truscott, John. 1999. What’s wrong with oral grammar correction. Canadian ModernLanguage Review 55, 437-456.

Tsui, Amy. 1992. A functional description of questions. In: Coulthard, Malcolm (ed.),1992. Advances in spoken discourse analysis. London: Routledge, 89-110.

Tucker, G. Richard. 1996. Some thoughts concerning innovative language educationprogrammes. Journal of Multilingual and Multicutlural Development 17: 315-320.

Unsworth, Len, 2000. Investigating subject-specific literacies in school learning. InUnsworth ed., 245-274.

Unsworth, Len. (ed.) 2000. Researching language in schools and communities. Functionallinguistics perspectives. London & Washington: Cassell.

van Lier, Leo. 1988. The classroom and the language learner. London: Longman.

Varadi, T. 1980. Strategies of target langue learner communication: message adjustmentInternational Review of Applied Linguistics 18, 59-71.

Varonis, E.M. and Susan Gass 1985. Non-native/non-native conversations: a model fornegotiating meaning. Applied Linguistics 6, 71-90.

VBS Vienna Bilingual Schooling Programme :h ttp://www.lehrerweb.at/ssr/europabuero/fremdsp/vbs/primary (last accessedNovember 2004)

271

Veel, R. 1997. Learning how to mean – scientifically speaking: apprenticeship into scientificdiscourse in the secondary school. In Frances Christie and James R. Martin (eds.)Genre and instituions: social processes in the workplace and school. London andNew York: Continuum, 161-195.

Ventola, Eija. 1995. Generic and register qualities of texts and their realization. In: Peter H.Fries and Michael Gregory (eds.) Discourse in society: systemic functionalperspectives. Norwoood, n.J.: Ablex, 3-28.

VOC TALK http://www.cec.jyu.fi/voctalk/over.htm

Vygotsky, L.S. 1978. Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes.Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1934/1986) Thought and language. A. Kozulin (ed. & trans.) Cambridge,MA: The MIT Press.

Wagner, Johannes. 1996. Foreign langauge acquisition through interaction: A critical reviewof research on conversational adjustments. Journal of Pragmatics 26, 215-235.

Waring,Hansun-Zhang 2002. Expressing noncomprehension in a US graduate seminarJournal of Pragmatics 34, 1711-1731.

Watson Todd, Richard. 1998. Topic-based analysis of classrooom discourse. System 26,202-318.

Wells,-Gordon 1993. Re-evaluating the IRF Sequence: A proposal for the articulation oftheories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in theclassroom. Linguistics-and-Education 5, 1-37.

Wells, Gordon. 1994. The complementary contributions of Halliday and Vygotsky to alanguage-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education 6, 41-90.

Wells, Gordon. 1996. Using the tool-kit of discourse in the activity of learning and teaching.Mind, Culture and Activity 3, 74-101.

Wells, Gordon. 1999. Language as education: Reconceptualizing education asdialogue. Annual Review of Linguistics 19, 135-155.

Wertsch, J.V. 1985. Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives.Cambridge University Press.

Wertsch, James V. 1991. Voices of the mind: a sociocultural approach to mediated action .London [u.a.] : Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Wertsch, James (ed.) 1992. Culture, communication, and cognition : Vygotskianperspectives. Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press.

Widdowson, Henry G. 1983. Learning purpose and language use. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.

Widdowson, Henry G. 1998. Context, community and authentic language. TESOL Quarterly32, 705-715.

Widdowson, Henry G. 1998. Skills, ability and contexts of reality. Annual Review ofApplied Linguistics 18, 323-333.

Wildhage Manfred and Edgar Otten (eds.) 2003. Praxis des bilingualen Unterrichts. Berlin:Cornelsen

Williams, J. 1999. Student-generated attention to form. Language Learning 49, 583-625.

Willis, Jane 1996. A framework for task-based learning. (Longman handbooks for languageteachers) Harlow, Essex : Longman.

272

Wilson, Valerie. 2000. Can thinking skills be taught? A paper for discussion. ScottishCouncil for Research in Education, Edinburgh. www.scre.ac.uk/scot-research/thinking (accessed 26.11.03)

Wode, Henning. 1995. Lernen in der Fremdsprache : Grundzüge von Immersion undbilingualem Unterricht Ismaning : Hueber.

Wolff, Dieter. 1996. Bilingaler Sachafchunterricht: Versuch einer lernpsychologischen undfachdidaktischen Begründung. Vortrag gehalten 21.11.96 Bergische UniversitätGeamthochschule Wuppertal) download www.uni-wuppertal.de/FB4/bilingu/bilingualer_sachfachunterricht.htm

Wragg, E.C. 1994. An introduction to classroom observation. London,New York:Routledge.

Zangl, Renate und Annemarie Peltzer-Karpf. 1998. Die Diagnose des frühenFremdsprachenerwerbs.Gunter Narr: Tübingen. (Germanistik: Dvi19)

Zeller, Albert. 2000. English Across the curriculum. English as the language of instructionat lower Austrian AHS-Secondary schools. MA Thesis. University of Vienna.

Ziegelwagner, Monika. 2004. Englisch als Arbeitssprache im Geschichtsunterricht. WelcheKonsequenzen hat der Einsatz der Fremdsprache fürdas Unterrichtsfach? MA thesis.University of Vienna.

Zuengler, Jane. 1993a. Explaining NNS interactional behavior: the effect of conversationaltopic. In. Kasper and Blum-Kulka (eds.), 184-195.

Zuengler, Jane. 1993b. Encouraging learners’ conversational particpation: the effect ofcontent knowledge. Language Learning 43, 403-432.

Zuengler, Jane and Donna M. Brinton. 1997. Linguistic form, pragmatic function: relevantresearch from content-based instruction. In: Marguerite Ann Snow and Donna M.Brinton. The content based classroom Perspectives on integrating language andcontent. White Plains: Longman, 263-273.

Zuengler, Jane and Junko Mori. 2002. Microanalyses of classroom discourse: A criticalconsideration of method: Introduction. Applied Linguistics 23, 283-288.

Zydatiß, Wolfgang. 2000. Bilingualer Unterricht in der Grundschule: Entwurf einesSpracherwerbskonzepts für zweisprachige Immersionsprogramme Ismaning: Hueber.

273