Regeneración urbana y eficiencia energética: hacia nuevos modelos de gestión Urban regeneration and

energy efficiency: Towards new management models

XXI Semana Europea de Gestión Avanzada

30 octubre 2015 Paraninfo de la ETS Arquitectura

Donostia-San Sebastián

Patricia Molina Costa Technical Coordinator (Tecnalia)

PROJECT OVERVIEW

Call: H2020-EE-2014-3-Market Uptake Topic: Enhancing the capacity of public authorities to plan and implement sustainable energy policies and measures (EE-07-2014) Type: Coordination and Support Actions (CSA) Title: Fostering public capacity to plan, finance and manage integrated urban regeneration for sustainable energy uptake Budget: 1,4 million € Duration: 2 years Partners: Tecnalia (coord.) Spain Surbisa Spain VISESA Spain EVE Spain TNO The Netherlands Gemeente Utrecht The Netherlands SDEWES Croatia Grad Osijek Croatia APN Croatia ASM Poland

Concept and Approach:

• Higher complexity when moving from EE building retrofitting to neighbourhood/district scale

• Integrated approach as the main driver of European urban strategy

• Need to integrate other dimensions and measures, and to find synergies: social, economic, over public space, mobility, etc.

• Many policies, plans and subsidies geared towards EE renovation, but not integrated within urban planning regulations.

• Misalignment of policies, plans and subsidies from different levels of government

• Key drivers for implementing EE measures at neighborhood level: engaging stakeholders, managing and financing renovation plans.

Global Objective: To enhance public capacity to plan, finance and manage integrated urban regeneration for sustainable energy uptake.

PROJECT OVERVIEW

OBJECTIVES

Consortium structure

PROJECT OVERVIEW

Eurocities CEMR UDN Cov. of Mayors

PROJECT OVERVIEW

Workplan structure

PROJECT OVERVIEW

PROJECT OVERVIEW

WP 1 – Management T 1.1 – Administrative & Financial Co-ordination T 1.2 – Monitoring & Reporting. T 1.3 – Participation in Common H2020 Activities WP 2 – Framework Design T 2.1 – Review of existing policies, planning, management and financing mechanisms T 2.2 – Stakeholder Mapping WP 3 – Collaborative analysis and proposals T 3.1 – Preparation of Workshop series and process design T 3.2 – Workshops in the National Clusters T 3.3 – Integration of Results and lessons for future application

WP 4 – Capacity Building T 4.1 – Capacity Building Planning and Content Creation T 4.2 – Training Activities WP 5 – Dissemination and Networking T 5.1 – Dissemination & Communication Plan, overall communication activities T 5.2 –Website and Social Media connection T 5.3 – Project Newsletters T 5.4 – Network Building and strengthening T 5.5 – Final Project Conference

Expected Impacts 1. Influence in public officers

2. New and improved plans and policies

• Strategy for implementing EE measures in an urban regeneration plan in each of the partner cities

• National strategy for multilevel coordination

3. Final consumers impacted

4. Acceleration of the Energy Efficiency Directive implementation • Art. 4 dedicated section in national workshops • Capacity building on financial aspects, such as EE obligation schemes

and EE National funds

PROJECT OVERVIEW

Gantt chart

Start End 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

WP 1 – Management 1 24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

T 1.1 – Administrative & Financial Co-ordination. 1 24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

T 1.2 – Monitoring & Reporting. 1 24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

T 1.3 – Participation in Common H2020 Activities. 1 24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

WP 2 – Framework Design 1 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

T 2.1 – Review of existing policies, planning, management and financing 1 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

T 2.2 – Stakeholder Mapping. 1 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

WP 3 – Collaborative analysis and proposals 1 12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

T 3.1 – Preparation of Workshop series and process design 1 4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

T 3.2 – Workshops in the National Clusters 4 10 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

T 3.3 – Integration of Results and lessons for future application 10 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

WP 4 – Capacity Building 13 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

T 4.1 – Capacity Building Planning and Content Creation 13 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

T 4.2 – Training Activities 16 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

WP 5 – Dissemination and Networking 1 24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

T 5.1 – Dissemination & Communication Plan, overall communication activities 1 24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

T 5.2 – Project website and Social Media connection 1 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

T 5.3 – Project Newsletters 1 24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

T 5.4 – Network Building and strengthening 13 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

T 5.5 – Final Project Conference 19 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1

Reporting periods: 1-12, 13-24Deliverables

fosterREG

Workpackages and Tasks

Year 1 Year 2Month

Project Milestones

D2.1

D2.3D2.2

MS3

D3.1

D3.2, D3.3, D3.4

MS2

D5.3

D5.4

D1.1

D1.2 D1.3

D4.2

D4.3

D3.5

D5.5

D5.1

D4.1

D5.6

MS4

MS1

D5.2

PROJECT OVERVIEW

WP2: Framework Design

WP2: Framework Design Lead partner: Tecnalia Timeframe: June-September 2015 Objectives: • To set up the appropriate framework for collaborative work between different

levels in the public sector to be carried out in WP3, and prepare the needed materials

• To identify the most appropriate stakeholders to get engaged in the collaborative analysis process

• To provide WP3 with initial analysis and perspective Deliverable

number Deliverable name

Short name of lead

participant

Delivery month

D2.1 Energy Efficiency in Urban Regeneration framework report

Tecnalia M4

D2.2 Stakeholder Mapping Report Visesa M4

WP2: Framework Design

Task 2.1: Analysis of existing policies, planning, management and financial mechanisms Task leader: TECNALIA Task participants: Tecnalia, Surbisa, Eve, Visesa, TNO, Utrecht, Sdewes, Osijek, APN • Analysis of current inclusion of Energy Efficient practices in urban regeneration plans, in relation

to: • policies • management procedures • funding sources and financial mechanisms

• The studies are focused in participating countries, and have been used to draw the appropriate conclusions both at National and European scales.

• Revision of existing literature of policies, planning, management and financial mechanisms at European level, including interviews to validate and contrast this information with relevant stakeholders, such as experts from DG Energy and DG Regio.

Deliverable D2.1: Energy Efficiency in Urban Regeneration framework report [month 4]:

This deliverable summarizes the analysis carried out in Task 2.1, enlightening common key issues at European, national, regional and local levels as well as highlighting different understandings of directives across all levels. It will be used in the preparation of workshops with stakeholders, as well as in project dissemination.

WP2: Framework Design

Task 2.2: Stakeholder Mapping Task leader: VISESA Task participants: Tecnalia, Surbisa, Eve, Visesa, TNO, Utrecht, Sdewes, Osijek, Apn, ASM • Based on the analysis carried out in T2.1, partners have identified relevant stakeholders at

different stages of energy efficient urban regeneration projects, at local, regional, national and European levels.

• Analysis of competencies and relationships among stakeholders (who does what and when) • As a result of this task, a list of potential entities and responsible persons is available for its

use in surveys, interviews and participation in workshops in WP3. Informed consent procedures will be followed to engage participants.

Deliverable D2.2: Stakeholder Mapping Report It includes a list of relevant stakeholders and a description of their roles, as well as a diagram visualizing their relationships to the urban regeneration process for each of the participating countries.

WP2: Framework Design

DRIVERS & BARRIERS

FINANCIAL

Banks are not interested in financing EE retrofitting and regeneration

Public financing is focused mainly in specific and non-replicable cases

Long-term processes with no benefits in the short term for companies and owners

High risk level investment due to social profile (low income)

ESCOs not very active in residential retrofitting (not profitable)

TECHNICAL

Noninvasive solutions are difficult to find

Lack of suitable spaces for centralization of heating services

Difficult integration of renewable energy sources in buildings

It is difficult to implement district heating at urban scale

Difficult to manage works at urban level (scaffoldings, storage). Affections to public space

Certain building typologies are difficult to retrofit (historic core/ towns)

SOCIAL

Management of Communities of property owners is difficult to deal with

No legal structure exists for Communities of property owners, makes difficult to finance

(one-by-one basis)

Fragmented property structure

Lack of culture of maintenance of common spaces

Need to balance EE requirements for all stakeholders (utilities, owners, etc.)

Lack of initiative from owners, neighborhood associations, etc.

Low income profiles are the most need of retrofitting

WP2: Framework Design

DRIVERS & BARRIERS

LEGAL/

ORGANIZATIONAL

Difficult to make land-use changes in general. Although in Bilbao we have find easy to

make modifications to adapt Master Plan to urban regeneration plans

Ley 3R* (art. 91): new rules for agreements facilitate retrofitting

Ley 3R: allows to invade public space for EE and accessibility (but not for habitability)

Legal barriers (current regulations) hinder installation of RES and self-consumption

Need to compensate different areas of the city through urban regeneration (surplus

from some areas should finance regeneration of deprived areas). Also in terms of EE

and RES requirements.

Great influence of energy utilities in EE legislation/ politics

MULTI-LEVEL

COORDINATION

Lack of multilevel coordination and transversality (lack of cross-directional

coordination)

Competencies fragmentation (more actors involved, more complex management of

any retrofitting)

Lack of communication, departments working in silos,

WP2: Framework Design

DRIVERS & BARRIERS

Specific (priority) barriers to

address (which barriers should

be focused on in the country

workshops?):

Change legal structure and capabilities of Communities of property

owners

Foster social awareness and engagement for EE regeneration

Involve financial actors

Reduce management complexity

Specific (priority) drivers to

address (which drivers should be

focused on in the country

workshops?):

Fiscal incentives for EE retrofitting and urban regeneration

Short term (easy) wins

WP2: Stakeholder Mapping

WP2: Stakeholder Mapping

WP2: Stakeholder Mapping

• Real estate and urban legal model changed in 2013 (3R Act), new framework and intervention model is needed

• New intervention model implies new policy and management schemes need to be developed

• Previous public administration role (vertical intervention model) must swift to new ways of intervention based on the consensus and co-responsibility of all the stakeholders involved in the process through a bottom-up approach.

• New intervention models implies the challenge of the “collectiveness”, both in the urban scale (i.e. district heating), and the building scale (i.e. the joint retrofitting interventions to incorporate technological improvements and scale economy factors).

WP2: Stakeholder Mapping

• Need for new roles and awareness from all the stakeholders:

– Public administration: Moving from an impositive model to a public-private partnership model, where public administration assumes a supporting and guidance role.

– Owners: Awareness of their relation with the collective values and the nature of the real estate properties as investment goods (not only as shelter).

– Private companies: A non-aggressive speculation business model deployment.

– Banks and Financing agents: New products and financing mechanisms for urban interventions based on multiple owners operations.

– Non profit and NGOs: New legal regulations to enhance their urban management capabilities.

• Need to redefine the public participation in the urban processes (citizens, both owners and tenants). The real bottom-up approach is a new way of taking part in the urban intervention processes