Regional Policy

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

11

INTERACT Pilot ActivityInterregional Cooperation

in Objectives 1 and 2

Kick-off meetingParis

15 March 2011Dirk PetersREGIO B.3

Regional Policy

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

22

OverviewOverview

1. Aspects to be covered (6 big headings)

2. Setting up of an EGTC

3. Possible amendments to OP’s

4. References, Questions & Answers

Regional Policy

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

33

1. Aspects to be covered1. Aspects to be covered

A. Who? - Partners to be identified

B. How much? Allocation; co-funding

C. What? - Priorities/measures/activities to be defined

D. How? - Project selection criteria and procedures; project implementation; financial control and audit

E. Where? – Expenditure outside own programme area

F. When? - Duration

Regional Policy

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

44

A) Who? – Partners to be identifiedA) Who? – Partners to be identified

There is no unilateral cooperation:

Any form of cooperation is about partners coming from regional/local authorities in at least TWO Member States!

Beneficiaries not necessarily only the «regional/local authorities»! (Genesis of that provision)

Political will and commitment of all partners is necessary,but not sufficient!

No partner identified in OP Art. 37 (-) Partner identified in 1 OP, but not reflected in OP of

«partner region»

«Unilateral cooperation with certain interregional scope»

Regional Policy

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

55

B) How much? – Allocation; co-fundingB) How much? – Allocation; co-funding

Absolute amount in € orpercentage (%)

specifically set aside on OP level or on level of priority axis Art. 37 (+)

Amount under Code 10 (interregional cooperation)additional argument Art. 37 (+)

No amount or % specified Art. 37 (-)

« Unilateral cooperation with certain interregional scope »

Co-funding rate according the co-funding OP;Article 53(3) Reg 1083/2006 does NOT apply

INTERREG IVC minimum/maximum amounts for projects do NOT apply

Regional Policy

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

66

C) What? – PC) What? – Priorities/measures/riorities/measures/activities to be defined (1/2)activities to be defined (1/2)

« Unilateral cooperation with certain interregional scope » Only own OP fixes content Art. 37(-)

Articles 4 and 5 ERDF apply, NOT Article 6! Partner regions identified in 2 OP’s +

in both OP’ amounts or % are identified « Mirror cooperation »

(1st degree of Art. 37 cooperation) Content different, identified in each OP

independently (especially in cases of cooperation between Obj 1 and 2)

or content identified in both OP’s with +/-same text but still separate selection criteria/ procedures

Regional Policy

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

77

C) What? – PC) What? – Priorities/measures/riorities/measures/activities to be defined (activities to be defined (2/2)2/2)

« Common cooperation » (2nd degree of Art. 37 cooperation)

Partners identified; amounts or % set aside!

Content identical in all OP’s

Common project selection criteria(but still formally separate selection procedures)

Common rules on project implementation

Regional Policy

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

88

D) How? – D) How? – Project selection criteria and Project selection criteria and procedures; project implementation; procedures; project implementation;

financial control and audit (1/3)financial control and audit (1/3)

« Joint informal cooperation » (3rd degree of Art. 37 cooperation)

Partners identified; amounts or % set aside!

Content identical in all OP’s

Common project selection criteria

Joint informal committee for project selection (to be validated by individual programmes)

Regional Policy

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

99

D) How? – D) How? – Project selection criteria and Project selection criteria and procedures; project implementation; procedures; project implementation;

financial control and audit (2/3)financial control and audit (2/3)

« Joint formal cooperation » (4th degree of Art. 37 cooperation)

Partners identified

Content identical in all OP’s

Amounts pooled together on joint account (possibly as a global grant)

Common project selection criteria

Joint legal body (EGTC?) to implement joint allocation

Regional Policy

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

1010

D) How? – D) How? – Project selection criteria and Project selection criteria and procedures; project implementation; procedures; project implementation;

financial control and audit (3/3)financial control and audit (3/3)

Financial control and audit:

Draw inspiration from Articles 14 and 16 of ERDF-Regulation for ETC

Joint body (EGTC!) to do 1st level controls in all regions

In each region own auditors audit, but all programme audit authorities recognize findings of the others

Regional Policy

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

1111

E) E) Where? – Expenditure outside own Where? – Expenditure outside own programme areaprogramme area

Article 21(3) ERDF-Regulation does NOT apply!Regions of third countries may participate,but EFRD cannot be spent there!

Expenditure outside own programme area possible under the following conditions:

• Co-funding OP region will “directly benefit wholly or predominantly” from such expenditure off-shore

• Authorities of co-funding OP bears ultimate responsibility for legality and regularity of expenditure off-shore

• Commission will only communicate with authorities of co-funding OP

Robust agreements between authorities of co-funding OP and of the region where ERDF is spent

Regional Policy

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

1212

F) F) When? – DurationWhen? – Duration

Final date for eligibility of expenditure:31/12/2015

INTERREG IVC rules on maximum duration of projects do NOT apply

OP’s free to work with (joint) calls or with an on-going system for project submission

Long-standing cooperation between regions (4 Motors for Europe) EGTC?!

Regional Policy

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

1313

2. Setting up of an EGTC (1/2)2. Setting up of an EGTC (1/2)

Partners set up an EGTC to implement mainstream interregional cooperation

Defined regions are partners (Quid new partners?)

Assembly defines themes, selection criteria and procedures

Director signs grants with lead beneficiary

Region 1 accepts that expenditure of « its » beneficiaries in Region 2 are controlled by Region 2 and accepts the results (inside EU)

Regional Policy

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

1414

2. Setting up of an EGTC (2/2)2. Setting up of an EGTC (2/2) Global grant Each managing authority entrusts the management of

interregional cooperation in the form of an GG to an intermediate body (EGTC?) via an agreement defining all aspects listed in Article 41 of Reg 1083/2006; EGTC is NOT beneficiary

Management costs of EGTC under TA! Not as Global grant Each OP just refers for the management of interregional

cooperation to an intermediate body in the form of an EGTC WITHOUT agreement between MA and EGTC; definition of all aspects listed left over to the EGTC; EGTC is the beneficiary(national/regional co-funding managed by EGTC as well?)

Once an EGTC is set up, it can be used for other types of interregional cooperation OUTSIDE Structural Funds

Regional Policy

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

1515

3. Possible amendments of OP’s3. Possible amendments of OP’s

According to Article 37(6)(b) All partner regions of EGTC are mentioned Joint priorities/measures/activities are defined Corresponding co-funding is fixed Code 10 of Table 3 (Territorial dimension) to be

added Following issues according to cooperation degree!• Details of implementation are left over to EGTC

(selection criteria & procedure, grant letters/contracts; controls)

• Global grant body and/or EGTC are mentioned in up-date of Management and control systems description

Regional Policy

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

1616

4. References; Questions & Answers4. References; Questions & Answers References:

• OJ L 210 of 31/7/2006 with whole legislative package

• INFOREGIO EGTC Committee of Regions

• INTERACT (Handbook how to set up an EGTC?)

Contact:

Dirk PetersREGIO B.3Tel. +32/2/296.6199dirk.peters@ec.europa.eu