84
viii
i
REGIONAL OFFICE FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC
FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
Bangkok, 2016
Regional strategy and action plan forsustainable intensification of aquaculturein the Asia-Pacific region
ii
Recommended citation
FAO. 2016. Regional strategy and action plan for sustainable intensification of aquaculture in theAsia-Pacific region. Bangkok, Thailand.
Cover photo credit(Clockwise) © FAO/Miao Weimin; © FAO/Miao Weimin; © FAO/Miao Weimin; © Hassanai Kongkeo
The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do notimply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and AgricultureOrganization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country,territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have beenpatented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference toothers of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views or policies of FAO.
ISBN 978-92-5-109139-5
© FAO, 2016
FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product.Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for privatestudy, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, providedthat appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and thatFAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way.
All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rightsshould be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licence-request or addressed to [email protected].
FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/publications) and can bepurchased through [email protected].
iii
Table of Contents
Page
Preparation of the document ....................................................................................................................... vi
Abbreviations and acronyms ........................................................................................................................ vii
Executive summary ............................................................................................................................................ ix
1 Background .................................................................................................................................................. ix
2 Objective ........................................................................................................................................................ x
3 Process ............................................................................................................................................................ x3.1 Background review for drafting the strategy and the action plan framework .......... x3.2 Regional consultation ....................................................................................................................... xi3.3 Finalization of the strategy and action plan ............................................................................ xi
4 Summary of the regional strategy .................................................................................................... xi
5 Summary of the regional action plan ............................................................................................. xiii
Regional strategy for the sustainable intensification of aquaculture in theAsia-Pacific region .............................................................................................................................................. 1
1 Background .................................................................................................................................................. 1
2 Purpose ........................................................................................................................................................... 2
3 The present situation .............................................................................................................................. 2
4 The challenge .............................................................................................................................................. 3
5 Vision ............................................................................................................................................................... 3
6 Goals for the strategy .............................................................................................................................. 3
7 Strategic framework ................................................................................................................................. 4
Strategic objective 1. Establish an enabling environment ............................................................ 4Strategy 1.1 – Develop and implement appropriate aquaculture policy and strategy.... 4Strategy 1.2 – Strengthen institutional capacity and arrangements ....................................... 4Strategy 1.3 – Develop and enforce effective regulations ........................................................... 4Strategy 1.4 – Develop and implement responsible aquaculture planning ......................... 5Strategy 1.5 – Improve access to markets and trade ..................................................................... 5Strategy 1.6 – Strengthen regional and private sector collaboration and cooperation .. 5
Strategic objective 2. Establish good governance, effective planning andmanagement ......................................................................................................................................................... 5
Strategy 2.1 – Establish and implement aquaculture registration and licensing ............... 5Strategy 2.2 – Promote and monitor responsible production management ....................... 5Strategy 2.3 – Establish and implement appropriate certification and standards ............. 6Strategy 2.4 – Improve farmer access to finance, credit and insurance ................................. 6Strategy 2.5 – Promote the organization of small-scale producers ......................................... 6
Strategic objective 3. Improved management along the aquaculture value chain .......... 6Strategy 3.1 – Improve management practices in production and distribution of
aquaculture seeds .......................................................................................................... 6Strategy 3.2 – Improve production and distribution of quality aquaculture feed ............. 6Strategy 3.3 – Improve productivity and economic efficiency .................................................. 6Strategy 3.4 – Improve management of post-harvest processing and marketing ............ 6Strategy 3.5 – Establish effective supply chains and improve management ....................... 7
iv
Strategic objective 4. Improve supporting services .................................................................... 7Strategy 4.1 – Strengthen training and build capacity .............................................................. 7Strategy 4.2 – Strengthen research and development ............................................................... 7Strategy 4.3 – Improve information exchange and communication .................................... 7
Strategic objective 5. Increase social responsibility and ensure equitable benefits ..... 7Strategy 5.1 – Enhance social responsibility ................................................................................... 7Strategy 5.2 – Promote equitable access to opportunities and benefits ............................ 7Strategy 5.3 – Promote and practice gender integration .......................................................... 7
Strategic objective 6. Strengthen focus on increasing resilience of aquaculturefarmers ............................................................................................................................................................... 8
Strategy 6.1 – Address climate change and natural disasters more effectively ............... 8Strategy 6.2 – Develop a more selective approach to the identification and pursuit
of the best opportunities for addressing emerging issues ......................... 8
Regional action plan for the sustainable intensification of aquaculture in theAsia-Pacific regional .................................................................................................................................... 9
1 Background ................................................................................................................................................ 9
2 Purpose ........................................................................................................................................................ 10
3 Impact .......................................................................................................................................................... 10
4 Preparation of the action plan ......................................................................................................... 11
5 The action plan ........................................................................................................................................ 14
Outcome 1. Enabling environment established ............................................................................ 14Output 1.1 – Appropriate aquaculture policy and strategy developed and
implemented .................................................................................................................... 14Output 1.2 – Institutional capacity and arrangements strengthened .................................. 16Output 1.3 – Effective regulations in place and enforced ......................................................... 17Output 1.4 – Responsible aquaculture plan developed and implemented ....................... 20Output 1.5 – Market access and trade improved ......................................................................... 23Output 1.6 – Regional and private sector collaboration and cooperation
strengthened .................................................................................................................... 25
Outcome 2. Effective management of the aquaculture sector .............................................. 27Output 2.1 – Aquaculture registration and licensing established and/or
implemented .................................................................................................................... 27Output 2.2 – Responsible production management promoted and monitored ............. 28Output 2.3 – Appropriate certification and standards established and implemented .... 30Output 2.4 – Farmer access to financing, credit and insurance improved ......................... 31Output 2.5 – Organization (clusters, cooperative, associations etc.) of small-scale
producers promoted ..................................................................................................... 32
Outcome 3. Improved management along the aquaculture value chain ......................... 33Output 3.1 – Management practices in production and distribution of aquaculture
seeds improved ............................................................................................................... 33Output 3.2 – Production and distribution of quality aquaculture feed improved .......... 35Output 3.3 – Productivity and economic efficiency improved ............................................... 35Output 3.4 – Management of post-harvest processing and marketing improved ......... 37Output 3.5 – Effective supply chain established and management improved ................ 38
Outcome 4. Improved capacity for supporting services ........................................................... 40Output 4.1 – Training and capacity building strengthened ..................................................... 40Output 4.2 – Research and development strengthened ........................................................... 42Output 4.3 – Information exchange and communication improved .................................... 44
v
Outcome 5. Increased social responsibility and equitable benefits ......................................... 45Output 5.1 – Social responsibility enhanced..................................................................................... 45Output 5.2 – Equitable access to opportunities and benefits promoted .............................. 47Output 5.3 – Gender integration promoted and practiced ......................................................... 48
Outcome 6. Increased resilience of farmers .......................................................................................... 50Output 6.1 – Climate change and natural disasters effectively addressed ........................... 50Output 6.2 – Other emerging issues addressed .............................................................................. 53
Annex 1. Regional Consultation on Strategy and Action Plan for SustainableIntensification of Aquaculture in the Asia-Pacific region ......................................... 55
Annex 2. Participants list: Regional Consultation on Strategy and Action Plan forthe Sustainable Intensification of Aquaculture in the Asia-Pacific region ...... 60
vi
Preparation of the document
This document is the product of a regional process supported by the FAO regional initiative onsustainable intensification of aquaculture (SIA) for blue growth in the Asia-Pacific region.A comprehensive review of relevant regional and global processes and relevant documentsproduced in the past decade was conducted and this contributed to a background document anda draft regional strategy and action plan for SIA in the Asia-Pacific region. A regional consultationwas conducted to formulate the final version of the regional strategy and complete the action plan.Forty representatives of the governments of 16 countries in Asia, five regional and internationalorganizations and five development agencies (donor agencies) participated in the consultation.Plenary and working group sessions were convened to modify and elaborate the structure and textof the regional strategy and action plan based on the draft documents prepared before theconsultation. A special effort was made to get direct inputs to the action plan from the concernednational authorities of all the member governments of the Network of Aquaculture Centres inAsia-Pacific (NACA). The inputs received from the government authorities were synthesized andincorporated into the action plan matrixes. The regional strategy and action plan were finalizedjointly by FAO and NACA.
Acknowledgements
The completion of the regional strategy and action plan for sustainable intensification of aquaculturein the Asia-Pacific region is primarily attributed to all the country governments, regional andinternational organizations and development agencies who participated in and contributed to theregional consultation for formulating the regional strategy and action plan documents. Specialthanks to Cherdsak Virapat, Director General of NACA and the Secretariat Staff of NACA for theirefforts in soliciting specific country government inputs to the action plan and for their contributionsto the finalization of the documents. Many thanks to Patrick White for his great contribution to thedevelopment of the regional strategy and action plan, particularly in conducting the backgroundreview, drafting the strategy and the action plan documents and facilitating the regionalconsultation. Many thanks also to Brian Davy for his help in synthesizing contributions andincorporating the specific inputs from country governments into the action plan matrixes and toChanphen Bhawangkananth for facilitating the publication of this document.
Simon Funge-Smith, Senior Fishery Officer, FAO Marine and Inland Fisheries Branch is gratefullyacknowledged for his technical advice and important contribution to the development of thedocument.
vii
Abbreviations and acronyms
WTO World Trade OrganizationADB Asian Development BankAFFS Aqua farmer field schoolsAPFIC Asia-Pacific Fishery CommissionAPRC Asia and the Pacific Regional ConferenceAQD Aquaculture DepartmentBGI Blue growth initiativeBMPs Better management practicesCBF Culture-based fisheriesCC Climate changeCEO Chief Executive OfficerDoF Department of FisheriesDRM Disaster risk managementEAA Ecosystem Approach to AquacultureEIA Environmental impact assessmentFAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsFCR Feed conversion ratioGAAP Global Aquaculture Advancement PartnershipGAqPs Good aquaculture practicesICT Information and communication technologyILO International Labour OrganizationIMTA Integrated Multi-Trophic AquacultureIT Information technologyITK Indigenous technical knowledgeMOU Memorandum of UnderstandingNACA Network of Aquaculture Centres in Asia-PacificNTBs Non-tariff barriersNGOs Non-governmental organizationsOIE The World Organisation for Animal HealthR&D Research and developmentRCFM Regional Consultative Forum MeetingSEA Strategic environmental assessmentSEAFDEC Southeast Asia Fisheries Development CenterSIA Sustainable intensification of aquacultureSPS Sanitary and phytosanitary standardsTCPF Technical Cooperation Programme FacilityTG Technical guidelinesUNESCAP The United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the PacificWB The World Bank
viii
ix
Executive summary
1 Background
Intensification of aquaculture has been an ongoing process in the Asia-Pacific region. Its aim is toincrease the productivity and economic efficiency of aquaculture production through the intensifieduse of inputs (materials, energy and investment) and resources (water, feed ingredients), and theapplication of new technologies and improved management practices.
Intensification of aquaculture has been a major contributor to the rapid aquaculture productiongrowth in the Asia-Pacific region in the past two decades (nearly 10 percent annually), which hascontributed significantly to food and nutrition security and livelihoods in the region. The region hasconstantly contributed over 90 percent of the world aquaculture production for decades.Aquaculture currently supplies 50 percent of food fish for the world and in Asia, aquaculture suppliesover 60 percent of food fish, comprising over 20 percent of total animal protein intake by the Asianpopulation. However, the impacts of intensification have attracted considerable public concernregarding the long-term sustainability of the sector.
Being the most populous region of the world with heavy demands on natural resources, Asia willface great challenges to maintain the growth of its aquaculture sector and to meet the increasingdemand for fish inside and outside the region in the coming decades. It is estimated that fishconsumption in the Asia-Pacific region will increase by 30 percent by 2030. With capture fishproduction stagnant, it is estimated that aquaculture production will need to increase by 50 percentby 2030 from the current level. At the same time, the aquaculture sector is facing serious challenges,the foremost being the impact of climate change and variability, urbanization and related social andeconomic changes, increasing intra-regional trade and increasing public concern over theenvironment and food safety.
Working with limited natural resources and in light of the various challenges, the only way to meetthe increasing demand for fish is to promote the sustainable intensification of aquaculture (SIA),which means “to produce more with less.” In other words, to increase the productivity and efficiencyof aquaculture production while reducing the consumption of resources and the negativeenvironmental and social impacts through improved governance, management practices and theadoption of innovative technologies.
The need for sustainable intensification of aquaculture production together with the application ofthe ecosystem approach to aquaculture has been the subject of several international fora andamong the priority recommendations emerging from the work of FAO and from regional bodiessuch as the Network of Aquaculture Centres in Asia-Pacific (NACA) and Asia-Pacific FisheryCommission (APFIC) and the Phuket Consensus emanating from the Global Conference onAquaculture in 2010. The Ministerial Meeting on Aquaculture for Food Security, Nutrition andEconomic Development in July 2011 in Sri Lanka has further identified four basic tenets ofa sustainable aquaculture strategy: (1) responsible access to and use of aquatic genetic resources andgenetic improvement; (2) sustainable farming systems; (3) aquatic animal health, includingresponsible transboundary movement of aquatic animals; and (4) appropriate responses to climatechange impacts. In order to promote the sustainable intensification of aquaculture, FAO supporteda joint APFIC/NACA regional consultation on the sustainable intensification of aquacultureproduction in the Asia-Pacific region (held in Bangkok, Thailand, October 2012). The consultationprovided a good platform for the wide exchange and sharing of scientific knowledge and practicalexperiences related to SIA and identified the needs for scientific research and technology
x
development to support SIA. To promote SIA, the Thirty-second FAO Asia and the Pacific RegionalConference (APRC) convened in 2014 included a working paper “Meeting farmers’ aspirations in thecontext of green development” that highlighted “sustainable production intensification” and aninformation paper “Sustainable intensification of aquaculture for food and nutritional security in theAsia-Pacific region.”
As the follow up to earlier FAO initiatives promoting SIA, the Fifth Regional Consultative ForumMeeting (RCFM) of APFIC (held in Hyderabad, India from 19 to 21 June 2014) included an individualaquaculture session titled “Promoting sustainable intensification of aquaculture for food andnutritional security in the Asia-Pacific region.” The RCFM acknowledged that a transition tosustainable intensification of aquaculture should focus on ensuring the prosperity of farming andrural communities, while addressing key sustainability issues related to the management of land andwater resources. The RCFM put forward a complete set of recommendations on priority actions infive major areas related to the sustainable intensification of aquaculture in the region, which waspresented to and endorsed by the Thirty-third Session of APFIC.
In order to provide more substantial support to member countries in promoting sustainableintensification of aquaculture, the SIA has now been included as the Asia-Pacific regional initiativeof FAO’s global blue growth initiative (BGI).
Although FAO and other regional and international organizations have launched various initiativesto raise awareness and identify priority actions related to SIA and although efforts have been madeby international/regional organizations, country governments, civil society organizations and theprivate sector to achieve sustainable intensification of aquaculture on the ground, there is a lackof a well articulated regional strategy and a comprehensive action plan to guide and supportthe concerted efforts of different stakeholders to support the sustainable intensification ofaquaculture in the region. Therefore, the Thirty-third Session of the Asia-Pacific Fishery Commissionrecommended further regional consultation to prioritize necessary actions at regional andnational levels and to develop a strategic action plan for supporting sustainableintensification of aquaculture in the region.
2 Objective
The development of the regional strategy and action plan is intended to promote the concertedefforts of member governments, regional and international organizations, donor and developmentagencies and the industrial sector to support the sustainable intensification of aquaculture in theregion. As such, the well articulated regional strategy and action plan sets a clear vision and goalsfor the development of the aquaculture sector, an appropriate strategy and an implementable actionplan defining the roles of different stakeholders in supporting sustainable intensification ofaquaculture.
The widely endorsed regional strategy and action plan can guide government policy adjustment andfacilitate the mobilization of investment needed to support the sustainable intensification ofaquaculture in the region.
3 Process
3.1 Background review for drafting the strategy and the action plan framework
A comprehensive review of regional and global processes related to promoting the sustainablegrowth of aquaculture and of the documents produced was conducted as the basis for drafting theregional strategy and action plan. The reviewed documents included the Phuket Consensus from the
xi
Global Aquaculture Conference held in October 2010 in Phuket, Thailand, the recommendations fromthe first Ministerial Meeting on Aquaculture for Food Security, Nutrition and Economic Developmentin July 2011 in Sri Lanka and the report of the Thirty-third Session of the Asia-Pacific FisheryCommission (APFIC) in June 2014 and other relevant documents produced by regional organizationssuch as the Network of Aquaculture Centres in Asia-Pacific.
3.2 Regional consultation
A regional consultation was convened by FAO in November 2014 in Bangkok, Thailand for finalizingthe regional strategy document and developing the complete regional action plan. Fortyrepresentatives of the governments of 16 countries in Asia, five regional and internationalorganizations and five development agencies (donor agencies) participated in the consultation. Thebackground review and the draft regional strategy and action plan framework were introduced atthe consultation for general comments and possible improvement. A number of working groupsessions was convened to finalize the structure and content of the regional strategy and to developa well articulated comprehensive action plan. The regional consultation also made suggestions abouthow to proceed to finalize the action plan and disseminate the final strategy and plan documents.
3.3 Finalization of the strategy and action plan
Following the recommendation of the regional consultation, FAO and the NACA Secretariat jointlyreviewed and finalized the revised regional strategy. FAO and NACA worked jointly in finalizing anaction plan matrix for each identified output, including the activities, indicators, time frame andleadership in the implementation. At the same time, a request was sent to all NACA membergovernments for their specific inputs with respect to country relevance, target for each outputactivity, estimated requirement of resources for supporting the implementation and likely source ofthe resources. Feedback was received from 16 country governments out of 18 NACA membergovernments. Most information received from the country governments was synthesized andincorporated into the action plan, but some of the inputs on country output targets and resourcerequirements were incomplete and too diversified in format to be synthesized into meaningfulresults and thus were not included in the final action plan.
4 Summary of the regional strategy
Continuing aquaculture growth in the Asia-Pacific region is considered vital to meeting theincreasing demand for fish inside and outside the region over the coming decades. Sustainableintensification of aquaculture (SIA) is now recognized as the major approach to achieve thesustainable growth of aquaculture in the region. SIA has now been identified as the Asia-Pacificregional initiative in support of the FAO’s global blue growth initiative (BGI).
Strategic objective 1. Establish/maintain enabling environment
A conducive enabling environment created and maintained for sustainable growth of the sectorcomprising a mix of economic, legal, social and physical components, combined with fair access toresources, access to credit and markets ensured, and the striking of a balance between thepromotion for development and growth and the need for management and control.
Recommended strategies include:
● develop and implement appropriate aquaculture policies and strategies;● strengthen institutional capacity and related supporting arrangements;● develop and enforce more effective regulations;
xii
● develop and implement more responsible aquaculture planning;● improve access to markets and trade; and● strengthen regional and private sector collaboration and cooperation.
Strategic objective 2. Establish good governance, effective planning and management
Effective governance developed, mainstreamed and implemented through sound policies, strategiesand action plans incorporating the principles of an ecosystem approach to aquaculture and moreeffective linkages between government policies and sustainable management of aquaculture.Capacities strengthened and built within institutions and more effective mechanisms of governancedeveloped, including rules and regulations, planning and management together with voluntarycodes of practices, and responsible self-management.
Recommended strategies:
● establish and implement aquaculture registration and licensing;● promote and monitor responsible production management;● establish and implement appropriate certification and standards;● improve farmer access to finance, credit and insurance; and● promote the organization of small-scale producers.
Strategic objective 3. Improve management along the aquaculture value chain
Implement effective “good management” by all stakeholders along the aquaculture value chain,which covers good production practices, quality control and performance assessment for allupstream inputs, production and downstream outputs, emphasizing efficient resource use, improvedproductivity and economic efficiency and sound social and environmental benefit in the process ofintensification.
Recommended strategies:
● improve management practices in production and distribution of aquaculture seeds;● improve production and distribution of quality aquaculture feed;● improve productivity and economic efficiency;● improve management of post-harvest processing and marketing; and● establish effective supply chains and improve management.
Strategic objective 4. Strengthen supporting services
Strong and effective supporting services are critical to future aquaculture success. This objectiveoutlines strategies to improve capacity for supporting services needed for sustainable intensificationof aquaculture. Focal services include targeted research and technology development andstrengthened dissemination, effective training and capacity building, and effective information flowand communication (e.g. related to natural disaster mitigation, preparedness/response/relief andclimate change impacts). Development of adaptation measures and building capacity specificallyfocusing on key emerging issues (details follow in the text) and overall targeting critical needs toassist/create more resilient aquaculture farmers.
Recommended strategies:
● strengthen training and build capacity;● strengthen research and development; and● improve information exchange and communication.
xiii
Strategic objective 5. Increase social responsibility and equitable benefits
Increased social responsibility and improved equity in participation and benefit distribution,emphasizing women’s rights and small-scale farmers’ benefits along the whole value chain throughincreased awareness and specially focused interventions.
Recommended strategies:
● enhance social responsibility;● promote equitable access to opportunities and benefits; and● promote and practice gender integration and a broader understanding of gender issues.
Strategic objective 6. Strengthen focus on increasing resilience of aquaculture farmers
Resilience of farmers and other stakeholders in the process of intensification is significantly increasedthrough increased preparedness of both farmers and other stakeholders in handling natural disastersand socio-economic risks, effective mechanisms for public warning, response and relief fromemergencies and strengthened capacity for managing natural disaster risks (and where possiblemitigating impacts of climate change).
Recommended strategies:
● focus on strengthening farmer/stakeholder preparedness/resilience;● effectively address climate change and natural disasters; and● identify where possible and address other critical emerging issues.
5 Summary of the regional action plan
In order to promote the sustainable growth of the aquaculture sector for meeting future fishdemand, generating more livelihood opportunities and contributing to overall economic growththrough sustainable intensification and the potential expansion of aquaculture in the Asia-Pacificregion, there needs to be a practically implementable action plan for implementing the regionalstrategy.
The action plan is expected to achieve the following major outcomes through effectiveimplementation with concerted efforts of different players, including but not limited to countrygovernments, different stakeholders along the aquaculture value chain, concerned international andregional organizations and donors and development agencies inside and outside the region.
Outcome 1: A conducive enabling environment comprising inclusive economic, legal, social andphysical components and fair access to resources, access to credit and markets, which strikes thebalance between the promotion of sustainable intensification of aquaculture for development andgrowth and ensuring good management and control is effectively established for the sustainablegrowth of the aquaculture sector.
Outcome 2: Effective governance through sound policies, strategies and action plans incorporatingthe principles of an ecosystem approach to aquaculture and good linkages between governmentpolicies and sustainable management of aquaculture. Institutions strengthened, capacity improvedand more effective mechanisms of governance developed, including rules and regulations, planningand management together with voluntary codes of practices, and responsible self-management.
Outcome 3: Good management is effectively implemented by all stakeholders along the aquaculturevalue chain, which covers good production practices, quality control and performance assessment
xiv
for all upstream inputs, production and downstream outputs, emphasizing efficient resource use,improved productivity and economic efficiency and sound social and environmental benefits in theprocess of intensification.
Outcome 4: Improved supporting services for sustainable intensification of aquaculture throughstrengthened targeted research and technology development and dissemination, effective trainingand capacity building, and effective information flow and communication.
Outcome 5: Increased social responsibility and improved equity in participation and benefitdistribution, emphasizing women’s rights and small-scale farmers’ benefits along the whole valuechain through increased awareness and specially focused interventions.
Outcome 6: Increased resilience of farmers and other stakeholders in the process of intensificationthrough their increased preparedness to handle natural disasters and social risks, through effectivepublic warning, response and relief mechanisms for emergencies and strengthened capacity formanaging natural disaster risks and mitigating the impacts of climate change.
The action plan includes expected outcomes and outputs with clearly identified indicators, targets,required actions, indicative financial resource requirement, time frame and responsible institutions.The details of the action plan were developed through a regional consultation attended bygovernment delegates from 16 countries, representatives from major regional and internationalorganizations related to aquaculture, development/foreign aid agencies of important donorcountries and the private sector. The action plan is presented herein as a modified logical frameworkmatrix.
1
Regional strategy for the sustainable intensification ofaquaculture in the Asia-Pacific region
1 Background
The intensification of aquaculture has been an ongoing process in the region for decades with theaim being to increase the productivity and economic efficiency of aquaculture production throughthe efficient use of inputs (materials, energy and investment) and resources (water, feed ingredients),and the application of innovative technologies and optimized management practices. Aquacultureintensification has contributed significantly to the fast growth of the aquaculture industry in theAsia-Pacific region, and has contributed to food security and nutrition, rural livelihoods and economicdevelopment across the region.
Although the continuing aquaculture growth in the Asia-Pacific region is considered vital to meetingthe increasing demand for fish inside and outside the region over the coming decades, Asianaquaculture is also facing significant challenges that must be addressed if its growth is to bemaintained. Such challenges include the impact of climate change and variability, urbanization andrelated social and economic changes, increasing intra-regional trade and widespread public concernover the environment and food safety. Sustainable intensification, i.e. “to produce more with less”, isnow recognized as the major approach to achieve the sustainable growth of aquaculture in theregion. In order to provide more substantial support to member countries in promoting sustainableintensification of aquaculture (SIA), SIA has now been identified as the Asia-Pacific regional initiativein support of the FAO’s global blue growth initiative (BGI).
As aquaculture involves both men and women across the value chain and related activities, gendercrosscuts many of the sector’s strategic issues. FAO has reported that giving the same access to menand women to agricultural resources will result in increased agricultural production in developingcountries by 2.5 percent to 4 percent. In addition, the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Securityand Nutrition recommended that gender dimensions in fisheries and aquaculture policies andactions be addressed seriously. In the action plan, gender-related outcomes and actions are detailedunder “Social responsibility and equitable benefits”, and it is expected that these will provide a moregender-sensitive implementation of the regional strategy.
In order to support country governments, international and regional organizations, donor anddevelopment agencies and the private sector in their concerted efforts to promote sustainableintensification of aquaculture, the Thirty-third Session of the Asia-Pacific Fishery Commission (APFIC)recommended further regional consultation to prioritize necessary actions at regional and nationallevels and to develop a strategic action plan for supporting SIA in the region. Therefore, an FAOregional Technical Cooperation Programme facility (TCPF) project was developed to supporta regional consultation on Strategy and Action Plan for SIA in Asia-Pacific from 27 to 28 November2014 in Bangkok, Thailand.
The objective of this consultation was to develop a regional strategy for SIA along with a practicaland implementable regional action plan. This regional strategy and the action plan seek to set a clearvision, goals and specific strategies up until 2030, as well as detailed action plans, including short-term (1 to 2 years) and medium-term (7 to 8 years) and long-term (10 to 15 years) for SIA in the Asia-Pacific region. It is expected that the strategy and the action plan will receive, at least partly, thefinancial support of donors and international organizations for their implementation.
2
The review of the sustainable intensification of aquaculture in the Asia-Pacific region identified20 key areas to be addressed as follows:
1 Governance, planning and management
2 Regional cooperation and collaboration
3 Genetics, breeding and seed production
4 Biosecurity and health management
5 Nutrition, feed and feeding
6 Sustainable aquaculture production and technology
7 Environmental management
8 Stock enhancement and CBF (culture-based fisheries)
9 Efficient use of land, water and energy resources
10 Aquaculture business and livelihoods
11 Climate change and natural disasters
12 Value chain management
13 Trade and marketing
14 Certification and standards
15 Food safety and quality
16 Social responsibility and gender equity
17 Small-scale producers
18 Emerging issues
19 Education and training
20 Information and communication
These issues were then incorporated into a proposed framework that would ensure continuedsustainable expansion and intensification of aquaculture in the Asia-Pacific region as follows:
● An enabling environment● Good governance● Management along the aquaculture value chain● Supporting services● Social responsibility and equitable benefits● Resilient farmers
2 Purpose
The strategy was developed to address regional priority issues in development and managementof aquaculture for sustainable growth in the Asia-Pacific region. It sought to address those issues thatare common to the region as well as those that are more specific to the subregions and countriesof the region.
3 The present situation
Future fish supplies will be dominated by aquaculture systems, mainly influenced by the followingconsiderations:
● Fish provides essential nutrition for over one billion people‚ including at least 50 percentof animal protein for 400 million people from the poorest countries.
3
● Over 200 million people in developing countries depend on fisheries and aquaculture fortheir livelihoods.
● Fish products are among the most widely traded foods – nearly 40 percent (by volume) ofworld fish production is traded internationally.
● The value of the global fish trade exceeds the value of international trade in all otheranimal proteins combined.
● Over 75 percent of the world’s fisheries is considered fully exploited or overexploitedleaving little room for increased harvest from wild stocks.
● Habitat degradation in the coastal zone and other critical areas such as coral reefs isreducing carrying capacity and biodiversity.
● One-half of all food fish supply comes from aquaculture.● Aquaculture is the world’s fastest growing food production system‚ increasing at a rate of
8 percent annually, but its growth has undergone some dramatic boom and bust cycles.● Good governance of inland and ocean resources will enhance food security‚ nutrition‚
biodiversity‚ gender equity and community resilience‚ and mitigate climate change.● Future fish supplies will be dominated by aquaculture systems.● Feed conversion rates for many farmed fish are more efficient than those of land-based
animal production‚ and aquaculture is an efficient user of water.● Aquaculture has the greatest opportunity for increased growth in supply and production
efficiency improvement through expansion and intensification.
4 The challenge
Aquaculture development in many countries is characterized by relatively weak governance. TheUnited Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP) definedgovernance as “the process of decision-making and the process by which decisions areimplemented.” Good governance was described by the World Bank as involving at least eight majorcharacteristics: participatory, consensus oriented, accountable, transparent, responsive, effective andefficient, equitable and inclusive, and follows the rule of law.
Poor governance results in poor planning, poor management and in some cases boom/bust cyclesoften leading to serious events such as major fish kills. Fish products have also become the objectof extensive international trade‚ most of it from poor countries to wealthier ones. Today‚ a substantialopportunity presents itself to increase the supply from aquaculture systems. Capitalizing on thisopportunity can create livelihoods and improve food security and nutrition for hundreds of millionsof people.
5 Vision
The suggested vision for aquaculture is:
“Create a conducive and enabling environment for sustainable intensification of aquaculturedevelopment within the carrying capacity of aquatic ecosystems, leading to enhancement of itscontribution to global food production and the prosperity of the peoples of the Asia-Pacific region.”
6 Goals for the strategy
Because aquaculture development is natural resource based, and the majority of stakeholders aresmall-scale, marginal and resource-constrained producers that typically share similar goals whenaddressing the major issues. These are:
4
● To provide an enabling environment with conducive legislation, policies on resourceallocation, access to investment and good access to markets.
● To ensure good planning and governance through national aquaculture plans, zoning foraquaculture development, farm registration/licensing, quality control of inputs, and goodmanagement and control of production.
● To ensure cost-effective and environment-friendly, productivity enhancement technologiesso that economic development is not a threat to natural biodiversity.
● To ensure good governance and management along the aquaculture value chain coveringinputs manufacture, farm production, health management, environmental monitoring,processing and marketing.
● To provide sufficient supporting technologies and services including seed, feed, healthmanagement and waste treatment.
● To ensure good social responsibility and economic performance through equitable benefitdistribution, gender participation and social acceptance.
● To ensure resilience of aquaculture farmers through addressing climate change and climatevariability, natural disasters, market volatility and other emerging issues effectively.
7 Strategic framework
To support the vision and goals, the proposed framework is built around six main strategicobjectives:
Strategic objective 1. Establish an enabling environment
A conducive “enabling environment” created and maintained for sustainable growth of the sectorcomprising economic, legal, social and physical components, fair access to resources, access to creditand markets ensured, while striking a balance between the promotion for development and growthand the need for management and control.
Strategy 1.1 – Develop and implement appropriate aquaculture policy and strategy
Develop, mainstream and effectively implement appropriate aquaculture policies and strategies atnational and local levels to enable responsible and sustainable intensification of aquaculture. Increaseawareness of the importance of sustainable intensification of aquaculture. Ensure that stakeholdersare consulted in policy development and decision-making.
Strategy 1.2 – Strengthen institutional capacity and arrangements
Improve capacity and strengthen institutional arrangements of the competent government agenciesfor aquaculture planning, management, monitoring and control in supporting sustainableintensification of aquaculture. Improve cooperation between those agencies responsible foraquaculture, fisheries, environment, food safety, etc. and ensure no/few gaps, conflicts or overlaps inagency jurisdiction.
Strategy 1.3 – Develop and enforce effective regulations
Develop effective regulations that facilitate sustainable intensification and responsible aquaculturedevelopment. Establish coherent regulations, harmonized and appropriate procedures for legitimateuse of land, water and other resources for sustainable intensification of aquaculture. Empowercompetent agencies and strengthen capacities for effective enforcement of planning andmanagement measures and regulations.
5
Strategy 1.4 – Develop and implement responsible aquaculture planning
Clarify long-term allocation and permission for coastal land, access to water supplies and aquaculturezones so that investors can have confidence in their investment. Ensure responsible planning tofacilitate the sustainable intensification of aquaculture by using an ecosystem approach to establishaquaculture zones using appropriate technologies. Undertake Strategic Environmental Assessment(SEA) for large aquaculture developments and undertake Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) forlarge aquaculture projects with a high risk of environmental and social impact. Encourage efficientresource use for existing and new aquaculture production and develop stock enhancement andculture-based fisheries further. Use underutilized water resources (e.g. via CBF, stock enhancement)or for other more appropriate secondary uses.
Strategy 1.5 – Improve access to markets and trade
Improve access of farmers to domestic, regional and international markets through the developmentof strong marketing mechanisms, market facilities, market information systems and aquaculturecertification, which contribute to improved economic efficiency in aquaculture intensification andmake it a more attractive livelihood option. Facilitate access to markets and improve marketinformation and marketing especially for small-scale farmers. Address non-tariff barriers (NTBs) totrade that have no economic or scientific rationale and reinforce efforts to improve trade facilitation,revise as appropriate trade-impeding regulatory barriers to minimize adverse effects.
Strategy 1.6 – Strengthen regional and private sector collaboration and cooperation
Strengthen regional cooperation and increase synergies with the private sector, donor anddevelopment agencies, NGOs and other national and regional institutions which will facilitate SIArelated training, capacity building, demonstration projects, R&D, etc. Improve collaboration andnetworking between regional organizations to ensure synergy and coherence. Facilitate theinvolvement of the private sector in decision-making and partnership with government anduniversities for responsible commercialization of the industry.
Strategic objective 2. Establish good governance, effective planning and management
Effective governance developed, mainstreamed and implemented through sound policies, strategiesand action plans incorporating the principles of an ecosystem approach to aquaculture and goodlinkages between government policies and sustainable management of aquaculture. Capacitystrengthened and built within institutions and more effective mechanisms of governance developed,including rules and regulations, planning and management together with voluntary codes ofpractices, and responsible self-management.
Strategy 2.1 – Establish and implement aquaculture registration and licensing
Develop or improve appropriate systems and measures for the registration and licensing ofaquaculture to ensure farms at all scales are registered and operate within the legal system.
Strategy 2.2 – Promote and monitor responsible production management
Promote and monitor responsible production management of the environment, diseases and farmgenetic resources to ensure sustainable aquaculture intensification. Implement appropriatemonitoring, reporting systems and control measures to ensure good stewardship and to build publicacceptance of the industry.
6
Strategy 2.3 – Establish and implement appropriate certification and standards
Establish appropriate national and regional certification schemes, standards and good aquaculturepractices and effectively implement them with provisions for recognition of equivalency to improvethe sector’s sustainability.
Strategy 2.4 – Improve farmer access to finance, credit and insurance
Provide financing and infrastructure support to aqua-farmers and producer organizations to enablecompliance with regulations and the practice of responsible aquaculture. Develop micro-financingmechanisms that assist marginal farmers to gain access to financial credits.
Strategy 2.5 – Promote the organization of small-scale producers
Encourage the establishment of groups, clusters and associations for small-scale farmers and provideassistance to organize training in management and technical skills and in better managementpractices (BMPs) in sustainable intensification of aquaculture, certification, environmental standards,food safety standards, traceability etc. Develop farmer groups, including encouraging clusters ofsmall-scale farmers and the adoption of relevant BMPs and where appropriate cluster certification.
Strategic objective 3. Improve management along the aquaculture value chain
Implement effective good management by all stakeholders along the aquaculture value chain, whichcovers good production practices, quality control and performance assessment for all upstreaminputs, production and downstream outputs, emphasizing efficient resource use, improvedproductivity and economic efficiency and sound social and environmental benefit in the process ofintensification.
Strategy 3.1 – Improve management practices in production and distribution of aquacultureseeds
Establish appropriate mechanisms for good practice, quality control and monitoring of aquacultureseed production. Develop a national programme for the genetic selection and management ofbroodstock.
Strategy 3.2 – Improve production and distribution of quality aquaculture feed
Establish a national mechanism for feed quality control and the use of alternative protein sourcesto use fishmeal and fish oil in aquaculture more efficiently. Ensure the use of efficient feedingstrategies by farmers.
Strategy 3.3 – Improve productivity and economic efficiency
Facilitate the improvement of farmer profitability and farm productivity through improvedmethodologies, health management and feeding practices and intensified assistance to small-scalefarmers, recognizing that they are the most vulnerable to the impacts of natural and economic risks.Facilitate the efficient transfer of appropriate sustainable technologies. Reduce the risk at the farmlevel through responsible health management, biosecurity and environmental management plans.
Strategy 3.4 – Improve management of post-harvest processing and marketing
Establish appropriate mechanisms for improved efficiency, quality control and monitoring of alldownstream inputs along the aquaculture value chain to support the value-added processing andproduct innovation necessary to create additional onshore jobs and supply chain activities.
7
Strategy 3.5 – Establish effective supply chains and improve management
Develop and implement measures that improve the value chain to infuse social responsibility,provide added value and increase efficiencies and incomes along the chain including bettertargeting of small producers and processors.
Strategic objective 4. Improve supporting services
Improve capacity of supporting services for sustainable intensification of aquaculture throughtargeted research and technology development and strengthening dissemination, effective trainingand capacity building, and effective information flow and communication. Effectively address naturaldisaster mitigation, preparedness, response and relief and similarly for climate change. Developadaptation measures and build capacity to deal with emerging issues and target critical needs tocreate resilient aquaculture farmers.
Strategy 4.1 – Strengthen training and build capacity
Strengthen supporting services for sustainable production through the improvement of education,training and capacity building, targeted research and development, and effective informationexchange and communication. Promote aqua-farmer field schools and exchange programmes.
Strategy 4.2 – Strengthen research and development
Support relevant and quality scientific research and technological development and encouragecoordination and collaboration among regional/national R&D entities in areas such as genetics,nutrition, fish health. Develop a regional R&D plan and foster cooperation and collaboration on R&D.
Strategy 4.3 – Improve information exchange and communication
Develop efficient communication strategies, infrastructure and information databases. Supportinformation exchange and communication activities that would allow for effective informationsharing to a wide audience in key languages.
Strategic objective 5. Increase social responsibility and ensure equitable benefits
Increase social responsibility and improve equity in participation and benefit distribution,emphasizing women’s rights and small-scale farmers’ benefits along the whole value chain throughincreased awareness and specially focused interventions.
Strategy 5.1 – Enhance social responsibility
Promote good company and family farm social responsibility and implement good employmentpractices and health and safety procedures. Establish and adopt effective mechanisms for conflictresolution.
Strategy 5.2 – Promote equitable access to opportunities and benefits
Promote equitable opportunities for benefits and rights along the value chain, especially for women,and poor and marginalized groups.
Strategy 5.3 – Promote and practice gender integration
Promote and mainstream gender equality as an integral part of regional aquaculture developmentpolicies and programmes in line with the globally accepted dimensions of gender equality andwomen’s empowerment.
8
Strategic objective 6. Strengthen focus on increasing resilience of aquaculture farmers
Resilience of farmers and other stakeholders in the process of intensification is significantly increasedthrough increased preparedness of farmers and other stakeholders in handling natural disasters andsocio-economic risks, effective mechanisms for public warning, response and relief from emergenciesand strengthened capacity for managing natural disaster risks, including mitigating the impacts ofclimate change.
Strategy 6.1 – Address climate change and natural disasters more effectively
Identify and facilitate cost-effective adaptation measures for climate change and effectivemechanisms to respond to disaster emergencies through concerted national efforts and intensifiedregional and international co-operation.
Strategy 6.2 – Develop a more selective approach to the identification and pursuit of the bestopportunities for addressing emerging issues
Increase capacity and mechanisms of national governments and regional organizations for effectivelyassessing, managing and responding to various emerging natural, biological and socio-economicrisks and complex global and regional interactions.
9
Regional action plan for the sustainable intensification ofaquaculture in the Asia-Pacific region
1 Background
Fish and other aquatic animals play an important role in global food security and nutrition byproviding low-cost animal protein, healthy fats and other micronutrients to people. Fish play animportant, even vital, role in the diet of people in least developed countries. Fish are often one ofthe few affordable sources of animal protein available to poor and nutritionally challenged peopleand can account for more than half the dietary protein intake in some countries.
Asia’s population is forecasted to grow by more than 700 million by 2030. This population growthand economic development are expected to result in significant increases in the global demand forfish in the coming decades. FAO has estimated that by 2030, the world will require at least another23 million tonnes of aquatic animal food above the current production level to sustain the currentper capita level of fish consumption. Asia is expected to make major contributions to meeting theincreased global demand for fish through further aquaculture growth (APFIC 2012), especiallythrough the intensification of aquaculture.
Intensification of aquaculture aims to increase the productivity and economic efficiency ofaquaculture production through intensified use of inputs (materials, energy and investment) andresources (water, feed ingredients), application of new technologies and new management practiceswhile minimizing social and environmental impacts and conflicts with other users of the resources.
Improving production efficiency is a major challenge for Asia, which has far less per capita availabilityof natural resources (especially land and water) than the global average. Asia also faces intensepopulation pressures and consequent competition for land, water and feed resources to supportthese growing populations. This will further challenge aquaculture production to use resources(particularly land and water) more efficiently and to justify its production against competingdemands from agriculture, livestock and urban and industrial development.
Sustainable intensification is now recognized as the major approach to achieve the sustainablegrowth of aquaculture in the region. In order to provide more substantial support to membercountries in promoting sustainable intensification of aquaculture (SIA), SIA has now been identifiedas the Asia-Pacific Regional Initiative in supporting the FAO’s Global Blue Growth Initiative (BGI).
In order to support the concerted efforts of country governments, international and regionalorganizations, donor and development agencies and the private sector to promote sustainableintensification of aquaculture, the Thirty-third Session of the Asia-Pacific Fishery Commissionrecommended further regional consultation to prioritize necessary actions at regional and nationallevels and to develop a strategic action plan for supporting SIA in the region. Therefore, an FAOregional TCP facility project was developed to support a regional consultation on Strategy and ActionPlan for SIA in Asia-Pacific from 27 to 28 November 2014 in Bangkok, Thailand.
The objective of this consultation was to develop a regional strategy for SIA including a practical andimplementable regional action plan. This regional strategy and the action plan seek to set a clearvision, goals and strategic plans up until 2030, as well as detailed action plans, including short-term(1 to 2 years), medium-term (3 to 5 years) and long-term (more than 5 years) plans for SIA in theAsia-Pacific region. It is expected that the strategy and the action plan will receive the financialsupport of donors and international organizations for their implementation.
10
The regional strategy framework and action plan were developed to ensure sustainability of ongoingintensification and potential expansion of aquaculture in the Asia-Pacific region by addressing thefollowing strategic areas:
● Effective enabling environment;● Good planning and governance;● Good management along the aquaculture value chain;● Improved supporting services for sustainable intensification of aquaculture;● Strengthened social responsibility and equitable benefit sharing among different
stakeholders; and● Increased resilience of farmers and other stakeholders.
The action plan will include a set of strategically identified outcomes that determine the desiredoutputs with defined indicators, targets, specific actions, timeframe, indicative financial resourcerequirement, source of funding and leadership.
2 Purpose
Although FAO and other regional and international organizations have launched various initiativesto raise awareness and identify priority actions related to the sustainable intensification ofaquaculture and efforts have been made by international/regional organizations, countrygovernments, civil society organizations and the private sector to achieve sustainable intensificationof aquaculture on the ground, there is a lack of a well-articulated regional strategy andcomprehensive action plan to guide and support the concerted efforts of different stakeholders.
This regional strategy should set clear vision, goals and strategies towards 2030, and the action planshould detail implementable activities with indicators of success, time scale for implementation forsustainable intensification of aquaculture in Asia.
It is expected that the implementation of the strategy and the action plan will be supportedfinancially by donor agencies and international organizations. The consultation will also assist inpromoting the coordinated and concerted efforts of member governments, regional andinternational organizations, donor and development agencies and the industrial sector to supportthe sustainable intensification of aquaculture in the region.
3 Impact
The impacts that are expected to be achieved by the successful implementation of the action planare meeting the increasing demand for fish as a source of people’s nutrition, significantly increasedemployment and a source of income for people engaged in the aquaculture sector and making acontribution to local and national economic growth through the sustainable growth of theaquaculture sector supported by sustainable intensification.
The successful implementation of the action plan will rely on achieving the following outcomes:
Outcome 1: A conducive “enabling environment” comprising inclusive economic, legal, social andphysical components and fair access to resources, access to credit and markets that strikes thebalance between the promotion of the intensification of aquaculture for development and growthand ensuring good management and control is effectively established to ensure the sustainablegrowth of aquaculture.
11
Outcome 2: Effective governance through sound policies, strategies and action plans incorporatingthe principles of an ecosystem approach to aquaculture and good linkages between governmentpolicies and the sustainable management of aquaculture. Institutions strengthened, capacityimproved and more effective mechanisms of governance developed, including rules and regulations,planning and management together with voluntary codes of practices, and responsibleself-management.
Outcome 3: Good management is effectively implemented by all stakeholders along the aquaculturevalue chain, which covers good production practices, quality control and performance assessmentfor all upstream inputs, production and downstream outputs, emphasizing efficient resource use,improved productivity and economic efficiency and sound social and environmental benefit in theprocess of intensification.
Outcome 4: Improved supporting services for sustainable intensification of aquaculture throughstrengthened targeted research and technology development and dissemination, effective trainingand capacity building, and effective information flow and communication.
Outcome 5: Increased social responsibility and improved equity in participation and benefitdistribution, emphasizing women’s rights and small-scale farmers’ benefits along the whole valuechain through increased awareness and specially focused interventions.
Outcome 6: Increased resilience of farmers and other stakeholders in the process of intensificationthrough increased preparedness of farmers and other stakeholders in handling natural disasters andsocial risks, effective public warning, response and relief mechanisms for emergencies andstrengthened capacity for managing natural disaster risks and mitigating the impact of climatechange.
4 Preparation of the action plan
A two-day regional multi-stakeholder consultation was undertaken with stakeholders on theproposed strategy and action plan in Bangkok from 27 to 28 November 2014. The consultation wasfunded and organized by FAO in collaboration with the Network of Aquaculture Centres inAsia-Pacific, the Asia-Pacific Fishery Commission and Department of Fisheries of Royal ThaiGovernment (Thai DOF).
The participants included representatives from member countries, major regional and internationalorganizations, civil society organizations, private and industrial sector representatives, and somedonor and development agencies.
The consultation also assisted in promoting coordinated and concerted efforts of membergovernments, regional and international organizations, donor and development agencies and theindustrial sector to support the sustainable intensification of aquaculture in the region.
Six outcomes were identified in the strategy and for each outcome there were a number of outputs.
The work team of FAO and NACA further worked on modification of the regional strategy and actionplan after the regional consultation. Efforts were made to solicit direct inputs from the nationalgovernments in the region on indicators, relevance, targets, resource requirement and the likelysources, implementation and who would take the leadership etc. Some of the country inputs weresynthesized and included in the action plan framework.
12
Table 1. Identified outcomes and outputs
Outcome 1. Enabling environmentestablished
Output 1.1 Appropriate aquaculture policyand strategy developed andimplemented
Output 1.2 Institutional capacity andarrangements strengthened
Output 1.3 Effective regulations in place andenforced
Output 1.4 Responsible aquaculture plandeveloped and implemented
Output 1.5 Market access and trade improved
Output 1.6 Regional and private sectorcollaboration and cooperationstrengthened
Outcome 3. Management along theaquaculture value chain
Output 3.1 Management practices inproduction and distribution ofaquaculture seeds improved
Output 3.2 Production and distribution ofquality aquaculture feed improved
Output 3.3 Productivity and economicefficiency improved
Output 3.4 Management of post-harvestprocessing and marketingimproved
Output 3.5 Effective supply chain establishedand management improved
Outcome 5. Social responsibility andequitable benefits
Output 5.1 Social responsibility enhanced
Output 5.2 Equitable access to opportunitiesand benefits promoted
Output 5.3 Gender integration promoted andpracticed
Outcome 2. Management of the aquaculturesector strengthened
Output 2.1 Aquaculture registration and licensingestablished and/or implemented
Output 2.2 Responsible production managementpromoted and monitored
Output 2.3 Appropriate certification andstandards established andimplemented
Output 2.4 Farmer access to financing, credit andinsurance improved
Output 2.5 Organization (cluster, cooperative,association etc.) of small-scaleproducers promoted
Outcome 4. Supporting services
Output 4.1 Training and capacity buildingstrengthened
Output 4.2 Research and developmentstrengthened
Output 4.3 Information exchange andcommunication improved
Outcome 6. Resilience of farmers
Output 6.1 Climate change and natural disasterseffectively addressed
Output 6.2 Other emerging issues addressed
The action plan was developed using a modified logistic framework matrix to define outcomes,outputs and activities. For each activity there are indicators in measurable or objectively verifiableterms, indicative time scale and indicative resource requirement.
Following the regional consultation, a clean version of the regional strategy and action plan preparedby the FAO and NACA teams will circulated to country government authorities through NACA forfurther validation and filling any country information gaps. The final strategy and action plan will be
13
produced after synthesis and incorporation of country comments and information provided. The finalregional strategy and action plan will be distributed to country governments, concerned regionaland international organizations and potential donor agencies and foundations for developingcountry and regional programmes and mobilizing resources for implementation.
Table 2. Legend for the modified logistic framework
Indicative timeframe Years required to implement
Short-term 1 to 2 years
Medium-term 3 to 5 years
Long-term 5+ years
14
5Th
e ac
tio
n p
lan
Ou
tco
me
1. E
nab
ling
en
viro
nm
ent
esta
blis
hed
A c
on
du
cive
“en
ablin
g e
nvir
on
men
t” c
om
pri
sin
g in
clu
sive
eco
no
mic
, leg
al, s
oci
al a
nd
phy
sica
l co
mp
on
ents
an
d f
air
acce
ss t
o r
eso
urc
es, a
cces
s to
cre
dit
an
dm
arke
ts t
hat
str
ikes
a b
alan
ce b
etw
een
th
e p
rom
oti
on
of
sust
ain
able
inte
nsi
ficat
ion
of
aqu
acu
ltu
re f
or
dev
elo
pm
ent
and
gro
wth
an
d e
nsu
rin
g t
hat
go
od
man
agem
ent
and
con
trol
is e
ffec
tive
ly e
stab
lish
ed fo
r th
e su
stai
nab
le g
row
th o
f th
e aq
uac
ult
ure
sec
tor.
The
outc
ome
is t
o b
e ac
hie
ved
th
rou
gh
th
e d
eliv
erin
go
f th
e fo
llow
ing
ou
tpu
ts a
nd
act
ivit
ies.
Ou
tpu
t 1
.1 –
Ap
pro
pri
ate
aqu
acu
ltu
re p
olic
y an
d s
trat
egy
dev
elo
ped
an
d im
ple
men
ted
Ap
pro
pri
ate
aqu
acu
ltu
re p
olic
ies
and
str
ateg
ies
are
dev
elo
ped
, mai
nst
ream
ed a
nd
eff
ecti
vely
imp
lem
ente
d a
t n
atio
nal
an
d lo
cal l
evel
s to
en
able
res
po
nsi
ble
and
su
stai
nab
le i
nte
nsi
ficat
ion
of
aqu
acu
ltu
re. A
war
enes
s o
f th
e im
po
rtan
ce o
f su
stai
nab
le i
nte
nsi
ficat
ion
of
aqu
acu
ltu
re i
s in
crea
sed
. Sta
keh
old
ers
are
con
sult
ed in
po
licy
dev
elo
pm
ent
and
dec
isio
n-m
akin
g.
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
1.1
.1 C
on
du
ct a
qu
acu
ltu
re s
ecto
rev
alu
atio
n a
t n
atio
nal
an
d r
egio
nal
leve
ls. M
ake
this
info
rmat
ion
rea
dily
avai
lab
le t
o d
ecis
ion
-mak
ers
1.1
.2 In
crea
se a
war
enes
s o
f th
ep
ote
nti
al fo
r su
stai
nab
lein
ten
sific
atio
n o
f aq
uac
ult
ure
, bas
edo
n f
acts
1.1
.3 D
evel
op
ind
icat
or
syst
em fo
rse
cto
ral p
erfo
rman
ce (e
.g. b
enef
it,
effic
ien
cy, i
mp
acts
) mo
nit
ori
ng,
asse
ssm
ent
and
rep
ort
ing
focu
sin
go
n s
ust
ain
able
inte
nsi
ficat
ion
of
aqu
acu
ltu
re a
t n
atio
nal
an
d r
egio
nal
leve
ls
Eval
uat
ion
rep
ort
s o
nco
ntr
ibu
tio
n (
toec
on
om
y an
d n
utr
itio
n)
of
the
aqu
acu
ltu
reav
aila
ble
Sect
or
advo
cacy
pro
du
cts
for
resp
on
sib
led
evel
op
men
t av
aila
ble
Wid
esp
read
an
d s
tro
ng
inte
rest
ap
par
ent;
13 o
f16
co
un
trie
s in
dic
ated
that
th
is o
utc
om
e w
asve
ry r
elev
ant
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edSI
A r
elev
ant
and
mo
stin
corp
ora
tin
g a
var
iety
of
SIA
tec
hn
iqu
es a
nd
pro
gra
mm
es
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
felt
ind
icat
or
syst
emre
leva
nt;
5 co
un
trie
s at
pre
sen
t d
o n
ot
and
wai
tin
g t
o s
ee p
rog
ress
in m
ore
aq
uac
ult
ure
adva
nce
d c
ou
ntr
ies
first
1 to
2 y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
alM
ain
ly n
atio
nal
bu
dg
et b
ut
vari
ed s
ou
rces
ind
iffer
ent
cou
ntr
ies
Mai
nly
nat
ion
al
Nat
ion
alg
over
nm
ent
lead
ing,
reg
ion
ally
NA
CA
, FA
O
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
al
Ind
icat
or
and
asse
ssm
ent
syst
em
Ass
essm
ent
rep
ort
1 to
2 y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
alN
atio
nal
15
1.1
.4 R
evie
w a
nd
am
end
rel
evan
tn
atio
nal
law
s g
over
nin
g f
ish
erie
s an
daq
uac
ult
ure
dev
elo
pm
ent
1.1
.5 D
evel
op
co
nd
uci
ve p
olic
ies,
stra
teg
ies
and
pla
ns
to e
nsu
re t
hat
aqu
acu
ltu
re in
ten
sific
atio
n is
sust
ain
able
an
d t
o a
llow
th
ele
git
imat
e u
se o
f w
ater
, lan
d a
nd
oth
er r
eso
urc
es fo
r aq
uac
ult
ure
dev
elo
pm
ent
add
ress
ing
foo
dse
curi
ty, p
over
ty, e
tc.
1.1
.6 C
on
du
ct a
nal
ysis
on
res
ou
rce
use
eff
icie
ncy
for
the
mai
n s
pec
ies
and
cu
ltu
re s
yste
ms
and
iden
tify
are
asfo
r im
pro
vem
ent
and
go
od
pra
ctic
es/
syst
ems
to p
rom
ote
1.1
.7 D
evel
op
an
d im
ple
men
tm
ech
anis
m t
o in
clu
de
rep
rese
nta
tive
so
f al
l sta
keh
old
ers
esp
ecia
lly s
mal
lsc
ale
pro
du
cers
in p
olic
yd
evel
op
men
t an
d in
dec
isio
n-m
akin
g
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
Ap
pro
pri
ate
pro
visi
on
sth
at d
efin
e th
ele
git
imat
e p
osi
tio
n o
faq
uac
ult
ure
dev
elo
pm
ent
and
sust
ain
able
dev
elo
pm
ent
Nat
ion
al a
qu
acu
ltu
red
evel
op
men
t p
olic
y,St
rate
gy
and
act
ion
pla
nd
ocu
men
ts fo
rsu
stai
nab
lein
ten
sific
atio
n
Mo
st in
dic
ated
th
is is
sue
is a
pri
ori
ty; m
ajo
rity
of
cou
ntr
ies
pre
sen
tly
wo
rkin
g o
n le
gal
rev
iew
Wid
e re
leva
nce
app
aren
t. M
ost
wo
rkin
go
n p
olic
y in
nea
r te
rm;
e.g.
Th
aila
nd
has
am
aste
r p
lan
; oth
ers
no
tye
t in
to p
lan
nin
g p
has
e
3 to
5 y
ears
3 to
5 y
ears
To b
e d
ecid
ed b
yco
un
trie
sN
atio
nal
gov
ern
men
tM
ain
ly n
atio
nal
Nat
ion
alM
ain
ly n
atio
nal
Rep
ort
s o
n r
eso
urc
e u
seef
ficie
ncy
cit
ed a
s ke
yin
dic
ato
r
Mo
st in
dic
ated
th
is is
sue
is r
elev
ant
1 to
2 y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
sect
ora
lN
atio
nal
Nat
ion
al/
NA
CA
wit
hFA
O/N
AC
Asu
pp
ort
Prov
isio
ns
ing
over
nm
ent
leg
isla
tio
nm
and
atin
g p
arti
cip
atio
no
f sm
all-
scal
e fa
rmer
gro
up
s in
aq
uac
ult
ure
po
licy
con
sult
atio
n a
nd
dev
elo
pm
ent.
Very
rel
evan
t,e.
g. 2
7 ty
pes
of
rele
van
tg
over
nm
ent
Leg
isla
tio
nlik
ely
in In
do
nes
ia
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
go
vern
men
tN
atio
nal
gov
ern
men
tan
d N
AC
A
16
Ou
tpu
t 1
.2 –
Inst
itu
tio
nal
cap
acit
y an
d a
rran
gem
ents
str
eng
then
ed
Cap
acit
y an
d i
nst
itu
tio
nal
arr
ang
emen
ts o
f co
mp
eten
t g
ove
rnm
ent
agen
cies
to
co
ord
inat
e an
d c
olla
bo
rate
fo
r aq
uac
ult
ure
pla
nn
ing
, man
agem
ent,
mo
nit
ori
ng
an
d c
on
tro
l sig
nifi
can
tly
imp
rove
d fo
r su
pp
ort
ing
su
stai
nab
le in
ten
sific
atio
n o
f aq
uac
ult
ure
.
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
1.2
.1 S
tren
gth
en c
apac
ity
for
gen
erat
ing
sci
enti
fic k
no
wle
dg
e –
tofa
cilit
ate
the
form
ula
tio
n a
nd
imp
lem
enta
tio
n o
f ev
iden
ce-b
ased
po
licy
and
man
agem
ent
mea
sure
s
1.2
.2 D
evel
op
su
ffic
ien
t ca
pac
ity
inth
e co
mp
eten
t ag
enci
es fo
raq
uac
ult
ure
sec
tor
pla
nn
ing,
man
agem
ent
and
reg
ula
tio
n [i
ncl
ud
esad
equ
ate
staf
fing
an
d s
pec
ific
trai
nin
gin
sec
tor
adm
inis
trat
ion
/man
agem
ent
and
pla
nn
ing
– p
oss
ibly
bas
ed o
nm
od
ule
s, b
oth
tec
hn
ical
an
dm
anag
emen
t]
Nu
mb
er o
f n
atio
nal
pu
blic
an
d p
riva
te R
&D
enti
ties
str
eng
then
ed in
hu
man
cap
acit
y an
dfa
cilit
ies
Nu
mb
er o
f cu
rren
t st
aff
wit
h u
pg
rad
edq
ual
ifica
tio
n a
nd
recr
uit
ed n
ew s
taff
wh
ore
ceiv
ed p
ost
gra
du
ate
edu
cati
on
Ap
pro
pri
ate
fun
din
gm
ech
anis
m fo
raq
uac
ult
ure
R&
D a
nd
reas
on
able
siz
e fu
nd
mo
bili
zed
to
su
pp
ort
R&D
rel
ated
to
SIA
(key
co
mm
od
itie
s)
Very
rel
evan
t fo
r m
ost
cou
ntr
ies,
bu
t st
ill e
arly
stag
e fo
r m
ore
det
aile
dd
efin
itio
n.
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
fu
nd
ing,
and
do
no
rs
Nat
ion
al a
gen
cies
and
do
no
rs
Nat
ion
alg
over
nm
ent
All
cou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
ed it
is v
ery
rele
van
t an
d h
ave
spec
ific
pla
ns
for
staf
fd
evel
op
men
t
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
gen
cies
and
reg
ion
alo
rgan
izat
ion
(e.g
. NA
CA
)
Nu
mb
er o
fA
dm
inis
trat
ion
/m
anag
emen
t an
dp
lan
nin
g t
rain
ing
pro
gra
mm
esim
ple
men
ted
for
com
pet
ent
agen
cy s
taff
Fish
ery
un
iver
siti
es
Reg
ion
altr
ain
ing
inst
itu
tio
ns
Nat
ion
al a
gen
cies
and
do
no
rs
17
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
1.2
.3. I
mp
rove
inte
r-ag
ency
coo
per
atio
n t
o e
nsu
re n
o g
aps,
con
flict
s o
r ov
erla
ps
in a
gen
cyju
risd
icti
on
(aq
uac
ult
ure
, fis
her
ies,
envi
ron
men
t, fo
od
saf
ety,
etc
.)
Ag
ency
sta
ffs
rece
ive
def
ecti
ve t
rain
ing
an
dg
ain
acc
red
itat
ion
or
cert
ifica
tes
of
com
pet
ence
Cap
acit
y as
sess
men
tre
po
rt o
n c
om
pet
ent
gov
ern
men
t ag
enci
esaa
a
Rep
ort
on
inst
itu
tio
nal
anal
ysis
for
aqu
acu
ltu
reg
over
nan
ce c
om
ple
ted
and
do
cum
ente
d
Inte
r-d
epar
tmen
tal/
min
iste
rial
co
mm
itte
e/m
ech
anis
ms
add
ress
ing
sust
ain
able
aq
uac
ult
ure
dev
elo
pm
ent
issu
esaa
a
Mo
st in
dic
ated
ver
yre
leva
nt
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
bu
dg
etN
atio
nal
gov
ern
men
t
Ou
tpu
t 1
.3 –
Eff
ecti
ve r
egu
lati
on
s in
pla
ce a
nd
en
forc
ed
Leg
isla
tio
n a
nd
reg
ula
tio
ns
that
fac
ilita
te s
ust
ain
able
inte
nsi
ficat
ion
an
d r
esp
on
sib
le a
qu
acu
ltu
re d
evel
op
men
t, an
d p
lan
nin
g p
roce
sses
usi
ng
an
eco
syst
emap
pro
ach
are
in p
lace
an
d e
ffec
tive
ly e
nfo
rced
. Co
her
ent
reg
ula
tio
ns
har
mo
niz
ed a
nd
ap
pro
pri
ate
pro
ced
ure
s es
tab
lish
ed f
or
leg
itim
ate
use
of
lan
d, w
ater
and
oth
er r
eso
urc
es f
or
sust
ain
able
inte
nsi
ficat
ion
of
aqu
acu
ltu
re. C
om
pet
ent
agen
cies
em
pow
ered
an
d c
apac
itie
s st
ren
gth
ened
fo
r ef
fect
ive
enfo
rcem
ent
of
pla
nn
ing
an
d m
anag
emen
t m
easu
res
and
reg
ula
tio
ns.
Mo
st in
dic
ated
ver
yre
leva
nt
18
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
1.3
.1 R
evie
w n
atio
nal
aq
uac
ult
ure
leg
isla
tio
n a
nd
reg
ula
tory
fra
mew
ork
incl
ud
ing
pu
t fo
rwar
dre
com
men
dat
ion
s fo
r th
e st
ream
linin
go
f p
roce
du
res,
and
cla
rific
atio
n o
fp
roce
sses
1.3
.2 T
imel
y u
pd
ate
and
str
eam
linin
go
f la
ws
and
reg
ula
tio
ns
1.3
.3 R
evis
e ex
isti
ng
aq
uac
ult
ure
reg
ula
tio
ns
and
man
agem
ent
mea
sure
s fo
r co
her
ence
an
dco
mp
reh
ensi
ven
ess
and
ad
dre
ssm
anag
emen
t n
eed
s o
f th
e se
cto
rin
clu
din
g b
est
man
agem
ent
pra
ctic
es,
bio
secu
rity
, hea
lth
man
agem
ent,
envi
ron
men
tal p
rote
ctio
n, b
iod
iver
sity
man
agem
ent,
po
st-h
arve
st p
ract
ices
and
foo
d s
afet
y et
c.
1.3
.4 E
stab
lish
an
d im
ple
men
ta
scie
nce
-bas
ed p
erm
itti
ng
an
dlic
ensi
ng
sys
tem
for
aqu
acu
ltu
reo
per
atio
ns
Rep
ort
rev
iew
ing
nat
ion
al a
qu
acu
ltu
rele
gis
lati
on
an
dre
gu
lato
ry f
ram
ewo
rkan
d r
eco
mm
end
ing
refo
rm o
r re
visi
on
isav
aila
ble
All
cou
ntr
ies
exce
pt
2 in
dic
ated
rel
evan
t1
to 2
yea
rsN
atio
nal
Mo
st v
ia n
atio
nal
bu
dg
et b
ut
som
eco
un
trie
s p
roje
ctn
eed
for
exte
rnal
fun
din
g
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
Ther
e is
an
est
ablis
hed
pro
ced
ure
for
per
iod
icre
view
of
aqu
acu
ltu
rele
gis
lati
on
an
dre
gu
lati
on
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edye
s re
leva
nt
bu
t5
ind
icat
ed n
ot
rele
van
t
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
bu
dg
etN
atio
nal
aqu
acu
ltu
reag
ency
Reg
ula
tio
ns
revi
sed
an
dm
anag
emen
t m
easu
res
dev
elo
ped
an
dim
ple
men
ted
Mo
st in
dic
ated
rel
evan
t3
to 5
yea
rsN
atio
nal
Nat
ion
al b
ud
get
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
Effe
ctiv
e aq
uac
ult
ure
reg
istr
atio
n a
nd
licen
sin
g s
yste
ms
Ass
essm
ent
rep
ort
on
curr
ent
per
mit
tin
gp
roce
du
res
Perm
itti
ng
pro
ced
ure
sd
evel
op
ed fo
r th
e
Mo
st in
dic
ated
rel
evan
tb
ut
4 in
dic
ated
no
tre
leva
nt
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
bu
dg
etN
atio
nal
aqu
acu
ltu
reag
ency
19
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
allo
cati
on
of
nat
ura
lre
sou
rces
(wat
er, l
and
etc.
) on
a lo
ng
ter
mb
asis
aaa
1.3
.5 E
mp
ower
th
e co
mp
eten
tag
enci
es a
nd
str
eng
then
th
eir
cap
acit
ies
for
effe
ctiv
e en
forc
emen
to
f m
anag
emen
t m
easu
res
and
reg
ula
tio
ns
Aq
uac
ult
ure
man
agem
ent
un
its
wit
hm
ore
cle
arly
leg
ally
def
ined
au
tho
rity
inco
mp
eten
t g
over
nm
ent
agen
cies
Incr
ease
d r
eso
urc
esal
loca
tio
n t
om
anag
emen
t u
nit
s to
bet
ter
per
form
th
eir
fun
ctio
ns
aaa
1.3
.6 D
evel
op
an
d im
ple
men
t h
um
anre
sou
rce
dev
elo
pm
ent
pro
gra
mm
e to
bu
ild c
apac
ity
in le
ad a
gen
cy t
oim
ple
men
t le
gis
lati
on
an
d r
egu
lati
on
sfo
r SI
A
1.3
.7 R
evie
w n
atio
nal
leg
isla
tio
n a
nd
reg
ula
tio
ns
for
har
mo
niz
atio
n o
f ke
ym
easu
res
to e
nsu
re t
hei
r al
ign
men
tw
ith
glo
bal
sta
nd
ard
s in
clu
din
g W
TO,
CO
DEX
an
d O
IE e
tc.,
and
to
avo
idp
ote
nti
al t
rad
e b
arri
ers
Aq
uac
ult
ure
man
agem
ent
un
its
stre
ng
then
ed in
com
pet
ent
gov
ern
men
tag
enci
es
Ag
ency
sta
ff t
rain
ed(a
ccre
dit
ed)
Revi
ew r
epo
rts
Har
mo
niz
atio
n p
roce
ssin
itia
ted
wit
hin
reg
ion
alec
on
om
ic g
rou
p t
ask
forc
e
Mo
st in
dic
ated
rel
evan
tb
ut
som
e ke
y co
un
trie
sin
dic
ated
no
t re
leva
nt
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
bu
dg
etb
ut
less
dev
elo
ped
cou
ntr
ies
ho
pe
for
exte
rnal
fu
nd
ing
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
Rele
van
t fo
r m
ost
cou
ntr
ies;
3 c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
ed n
ot
rele
van
t
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
aqu
acu
ltu
reag
ency
Rele
van
t fo
r m
ost
cou
ntr
ies,
bu
t4
ind
icat
ed n
ot
rele
van
t
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
alN
atio
nal
aqu
acu
ltu
reag
ency
20
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
1.3
.8 A
sses
s n
atio
nal
lan
d a
nd
aq
uat
icp
rop
erty
rig
hts
an
d Id
enti
fy m
easu
res
to s
tren
gth
en lo
ng
-ter
m r
igh
ts fo
raq
uac
ult
ure
use
Leg
al in
stru
men
tsst
ren
gth
enin
g p
rop
erty
and
wat
er r
igh
ts a
nd
len
gth
of
lan
d a
nd
wat
erle
ase
ten
ure
for
aqu
acu
ltu
re
Rele
van
t fo
r m
ost
cou
ntr
ies
(bu
t5
ind
icat
ed n
ot
rele
van
t)
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alM
ost
nat
ion
al b
ut
som
e le
ssd
evel
op
edco
un
trie
s h
op
efo
r ex
tern
alfu
nd
ing
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
Ou
tpu
t 1
.4 –
Res
po
nsi
ble
aq
uac
ult
ure
pla
n d
evel
op
ed a
nd
imp
lem
ente
d
Lon
g-t
erm
allo
cati
on
an
d a
war
din
g o
f per
mit
s cl
arifi
ed fo
r co
asta
l lan
d, a
cces
s to
wat
er s
up
plie
s an
d a
qu
acu
ltu
re z
on
es s
o t
hat
inve
sto
rs c
an h
ave
con
fiden
cein
th
eir
inve
stm
ents
. Res
po
nsi
ble
pla
nn
ing
to
fac
ilita
te t
he
sust
ain
able
inte
nsi
ficat
ion
of
aqu
acu
ltu
re u
sin
g a
n e
cosy
stem
ap
pro
ach
to
est
ablis
h a
qu
acu
ltu
rezo
nes
usi
ng
ap
pro
pri
ate
tech
no
log
ies.
Str
ateg
ic E
nvir
on
men
tal A
sses
smen
t (S
EA) u
nd
erta
ken
for
larg
e aq
uac
ult
ure
dev
elo
pm
ents
an
d E
nvir
on
men
tal I
mp
act
Ass
essm
ent
(EIA
) un
der
take
n fo
r la
rge
aqu
acu
ltu
re p
roje
cts
wit
h a
hig
h r
isk
of e
nviro
nm
enta
l an
d s
oci
al im
pac
t. Ef
ficie
nt
reso
urc
e u
se e
nco
ura
ged
for
exis
tin
gan
d n
ew a
qu
acu
ltu
re p
rod
uct
ion
. Fu
rth
er d
evel
op
men
t o
f st
ock
en
han
cem
ent
and
cu
ltu
re-b
ased
fis
her
ies.
Use
un
der
uti
lized
wat
er r
eso
urc
es (e
.g. C
BF, s
tock
enh
ance
men
t) o
r fo
r se
con
dar
y u
se.
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
1.4
.1 D
evel
op
ap
pro
pri
ate
pla
n fo
raq
uac
ult
ure
inte
nsi
ficat
ion
for
key
com
mo
dit
ies,
aqu
acu
ltu
re s
yste
ms
or
sub
-nat
ion
al a
reas
an
d u
pd
ate
wh
enn
eces
sary
1.4
.2 D
evel
op
cap
acit
y o
f g
over
nm
ent
agen
cies
for
resp
on
sib
le p
lan
nin
g(s
ite
sele
ctio
n a
nd
zo
nin
g, c
arry
ing
cap
acit
y es
tim
atio
n, e
tc.)
esp
ecia
llyin
co
un
trie
s w
ith
pre
sen
t lo
waq
uac
ult
ure
pro
du
ctio
n a
nd
co
un
trie
sw
ith
hig
h p
ote
nti
al fo
r fu
ture
gro
wth
Spec
ific
aqu
acu
ltu
rein
ten
sific
atio
n p
lan
s fo
rke
y co
mm
od
itie
s,aq
uac
ult
ure
sys
tem
s o
rsu
b-n
atio
nal
are
as
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
stat
ere
leva
nt
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
sect
ora
l
Nat
ion
al a
nd
inte
rnat
ion
al(e
.g. F
AO
)
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
Nu
mb
er o
f ad
van
ced
trai
nin
g p
rog
ram
mes
avai
lab
le
Nu
mb
er o
f st
aff
trai
ned
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
stat
ere
leva
nt
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
aqu
acu
ltu
reag
ency
, FA
O,
NA
CA
21
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
1.4
.3 D
evel
op
tra
inin
g p
rog
ram
mes
on
aq
uac
ult
ure
pla
nn
ing
bas
ed o
nEc
osy
stem
Ap
pro
ach
to
Aq
uac
ult
ure
(EA
A) a
nd
org
aniz
e th
e tr
ain
ing
at
reg
ion
al a
nd
nat
ion
al le
vels
1.4
.4 B
uild
cap
acit
y w
ith
in li
ne
agen
cies
to
uti
lize
too
ls fo
r p
lan
nin
gin
clu
din
g:
a) B
uild
cap
acit
y w
ith
in t
he
line
agen
cies
for
aqu
acu
ltu
re p
lan
nin
g fo
rth
e id
enti
ficat
ion
of
zon
es a
nd
sit
esu
sin
g s
pat
ial p
lan
nin
g t
oo
ls
b) E
stab
lish
sit
e se
lect
ion
cri
teri
a
c) U
se o
f EI
A,S
EAo
r ap
pro
pri
ate
envi
ron
men
tal a
sses
smen
t fo
r la
rge
pro
ject
s th
at h
ave
a h
igh
ris
k o
fen
viro
nm
enta
l an
d s
oci
al im
pac
t
d) B
uild
cap
acit
y w
ith
in t
he
line
agen
cies
for
aqu
acu
ltu
re p
lan
nin
g fo
ren
viro
nm
enta
l car
ryin
g c
apac
ity
mo
del
ing
to
est
ablis
h li
mit
s fo
raq
uac
ult
ure
zo
nes
/far
min
g a
reas
1.4
.5 E
stab
lish
max
imu
m p
rod
uct
ion
limit
s in
pro
du
ctio
n a
reas
an
dw
ater
bo
die
s b
ased
on
an
eva
luat
ion
of
thei
r en
viro
nm
enta
l an
d s
oci
alca
rryi
ng
cap
acit
y b
y lo
cal c
om
pet
ent
agen
cies
Nu
mb
er o
f tr
ain
ing
pro
gra
mm
es
Nu
mb
er o
f p
eop
letr
ain
ed
Nu
mb
er o
f aq
uac
ult
ure
man
agem
ent
agen
cies
cap
able
of
usi
ng
EA
A a
sa
pla
nn
ing
to
ol
Nu
mb
er o
f ag
enci
esu
sin
g o
f p
lan
nin
g t
oo
ls
Mo
st in
dic
ated
rel
evan
t(o
nly
2 in
dic
ated
no
tre
leva
nt)
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
alN
atio
nal
, bu
tex
tern
al f
un
ds
nee
ded
in le
ssad
van
ced
cou
ntr
ies
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
Mo
st in
dic
ated
rel
evan
t,b
ut
5 sa
id n
ot
rele
van
t3
to 5
yea
rsN
atio
nal
Nat
ion
al b
ud
get
and
ext
ern
alfu
nd
s (e
.g. f
rom
TCPF
an
dg
ove
rnm
ent)
Nat
ion
alg
over
nm
ent
Lim
its
for
max
imu
mp
rod
uct
ion
/cu
ltu
re a
rea
for
spec
ific
area
/w
ater
bo
dy
esta
blis
hed
and
en
forc
ed
Mo
st in
dic
ated
rel
evan
t,b
ut
5 sa
id n
ot
rele
van
t,in
clu
din
g s
om
e le
adin
gaq
uac
ult
ure
co
un
trie
s
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
bu
dg
etan
d d
on
ors
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
22
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
1.4
.6 Id
enti
fy s
uit
able
new
are
as(in
clu
din
g m
arin
e ar
ea) u
sin
g G
ISm
app
ing
an
d r
eso
urc
es f
or
po
ten
tial
exp
ansi
on
of
aqu
acu
ltu
re p
rod
uct
ion
1.4
.7 C
on
du
ct a
nal
ysis
of
po
ten
tial
and
co
nst
rain
ts fo
r SI
A d
evel
op
men
t,in
clu
din
g p
lan
nin
g e
spec
ially
inco
un
trie
s w
ith
low
aq
uac
ult
ure
pro
du
ctio
n a
t p
rese
nt
and
/or
hig
hp
ote
nti
al fo
r fu
rth
er g
row
th
1.4
.8 A
sses
s p
ote
nti
al o
f in
crea
sin
gfis
h p
rod
uct
ion
th
rou
gh
exp
ansi
on
and
imp
rove
men
t o
f cu
ltu
re-b
ased
fish
erie
s an
d im
ple
men
t p
ilot
pro
ject
sto
imp
rove
CB
F
1.4
.9 In
crea
se c
apac
ity
for
iden
tific
atio
n o
f ex
isti
ng
aq
uac
ult
ure
pro
du
ctio
n a
nd
pro
du
ctio
n s
tati
stic
sg
ath
erin
g, p
roce
ssin
g, a
nal
ysis
to
sup
po
rt in
form
ed p
lan
nin
g
New
are
as a
nd
reso
urc
es id
enti
fied
Nat
ion
al p
lan
s fo
rsu
stai
nab
le g
row
th o
faq
uac
ult
ure
tak
ing
into
acco
un
t o
f p
oss
ibili
ties
for
inte
nsi
ficat
ion
and
use
of
exis
tin
gre
sou
rces
Nu
mb
er o
f co
un
trie
sth
at c
on
du
cted
an
alys
iso
f su
stai
nab
lein
ten
sific
atio
n o
faq
uac
ult
ure
op
po
rtu
nit
ies
and
chal
len
ges
Nu
mb
er o
f co
un
trie
sth
at d
evel
op
ed n
atio
nal
acti
on
pla
ns
for
SIA
Rele
van
t fo
r m
ost
, bu
t5
ind
icat
ed n
ot
rele
van
t1
to 2
yea
rsN
atio
nal
Nat
ion
al b
ud
get
and
do
no
rsN
atio
nal
aqu
acu
ltu
reag
ency
Mo
st s
ay r
elev
ant
bu
t5
cou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edn
ot
rele
van
t
1 to
2 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
go
vern
men
ts a
nd
inte
rnat
ion
ald
on
ors
(FA
O)
NA
CA
Ass
essm
ent
rep
ort
sp
ilot
pro
ject
sim
ple
men
ted
Mo
st s
ay r
elev
ant
bu
t5
cou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edn
ot
rele
van
t
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
bu
dg
etan
d d
on
ors
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
Rele
van
t d
atab
ases
esta
blis
hed
/im
pro
ved
Info
rmat
ion
man
agem
ent
syst
ems
esta
blis
hed
/st
ren
gth
ened
Mo
st s
ay r
elev
ant,
bu
t5
cou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edn
ot
rele
van
t
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alM
ost
ext
ern
alfu
nd
ing
to
be
sou
gh
t
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
23
Ou
tpu
t 1
.5 –
Mar
ket
acce
ss a
nd
tra
de
imp
rove
d
Incr
ease
acc
ess
of
farm
ers
to d
om
esti
c, r
egio
nal
an
d in
tern
atio
nal
mar
kets
sig
nifi
can
tly
thro
ug
h w
ell-
esta
blis
hed
mar
keti
ng
mec
han
ism
s, m
arke
t fa
cilit
ies,
mar
ket
info
rmat
ion
sys
tem
s an
d a
qu
acu
ltu
re c
erti
ficat
ion
. All
of
thes
e co
ntr
ibu
te t
o im
pro
ved
eco
no
mic
eff
icie
ncy
in a
qu
acu
ltu
re in
ten
sific
atio
n a
nd
mak
eit
an
att
ract
ive
livel
iho
od
op
tio
n. F
acili
tate
acc
ess
to m
arke
ts a
nd
imp
rove
mar
ket
info
rmat
ion
an
d m
arke
tin
g e
spec
ially
for
smal
l-sca
le fa
rmer
s. A
dd
ress
no
n-
tari
ff b
arri
ers
(NBT
s) t
o t
rad
e th
at h
ave
no
eco
no
mic
or
scie
nti
fic r
atio
nal
e an
d r
ein
forc
e ef
fort
s to
im
pro
ve t
rad
e fa
cilit
atio
n, r
evis
e, a
s ap
pro
pri
ate,
tra
de-
imp
edin
g r
egu
lato
ry b
arri
ers
to m
inim
ize
adve
rse
effe
cts.
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
1.5
.1 Im
pro
ve a
cces
s to
mar
kets
,es
pec
ially
for
smal
-sca
le t
o m
ediu
m-
scal
e fa
rmer
s th
rou
gh
est
ablis
hin
gef
fect
ive
mar
keti
ng
ch
ann
els
and
faci
litie
s
1.5
.2 E
nab
le s
mal
l an
d m
ediu
m s
ized
pro
du
cers
to
par
tici
pat
e in
dev
elo
pm
ent
of
po
licy
rela
ted
to
mar
ket
acce
ss
1.5
.3 C
on
du
ct m
arke
t re
sear
ch a
nd
dev
elo
pm
ent
for
the
mai
n c
ult
ure
dsp
ecie
s, in
clu
din
g h
igh
val
ue
nic
he
mar
kets
Nu
mb
er/p
erce
nta
ge
of
smal
l an
d m
ediu
m s
ized
pro
du
cers
org
aniz
ed t
oco
llab
ora
te o
nd
istr
ibu
tio
n t
o m
arke
ts
Mo
st in
dic
ated
rel
evan
t,b
ut
5 o
f 16
co
un
trie
sin
dic
ated
no
t re
leva
nt
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
bu
dg
etan
d d
on
ors
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
Plat
form
s/m
ech
anis
ms
to e
nab
le s
mal
l an
dm
ediu
m s
ized
pro
du
cers
to p
arti
cip
ate
ind
evel
op
men
t o
f p
olic
yre
late
d t
o m
arke
t ac
cess
dev
elo
ped
Mo
st in
dic
ated
rel
evan
t,b
ut
6 in
dic
ated
no
tre
leva
nt
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
bu
dg
etan
d d
on
ors
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
Stu
dy
rep
ort
s o
n lo
cal
and
exp
ort
mar
ket
volu
me
and
pri
ce fo
rke
y cu
ltu
red
sp
ecie
sco
nd
uct
ed, r
egu
larl
yu
pd
ated
an
dd
isse
min
ated
Maj
ori
ty in
dic
ated
rele
van
t, b
ut
3 co
un
trie
sin
dic
ated
no
t re
leva
nt
1 to
2 y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
sect
ora
lN
atio
nal
bu
dg
etan
d d
on
ors
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
24
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
1.5
.4 A
sses
s th
e p
rese
nt
cap
acit
y an
dse
rvic
es o
f n
atio
nal
an
d r
egio
nal
fis
htr
ade
info
rmat
ion
org
aniz
atio
ns
and
bu
ild t
hei
r ca
pac
ity
wh
ere
nec
essa
ry
1.5
.5 A
nal
yze
no
n-t
ariff
bar
rier
s(N
TBs)
imp
ose
d b
y im
po
rtin
gco
un
trie
s an
d d
evel
op
co
un
tera
ctin
gm
easu
res
to m
inim
ize
the
imp
act
1.5
.6 A
nal
yze
tari
ff m
easu
res
and
ensu
re t
hat
th
ey c
om
ply
wit
hre
gio
nal
an
d W
TO o
blig
atio
ns
1.5
.7 A
nal
yze
nat
ion
al fo
od
saf
ety,
san
itar
y an
d q
ual
ity
stan
dar
ds
and
ensu
re t
hat
th
ey c
om
ply
wit
hin
tern
atio
nal
sta
nd
ard
s
1.5
.8 B
uild
cap
acit
y in
co
mp
eten
tau
tho
rity
in s
up
po
rt o
f co
mp
lian
cew
ith
san
itar
y an
d p
hyt
osa
nit
ary
stan
dar
ds
(SPS
) an
d fo
od
saf
ety
stan
dar
ds
Cap
acit
y n
eed
sas
sess
men
t re
po
rts
Nu
mb
er o
fo
rgan
izat
ion
s id
enti
fied
and
str
eng
then
ed fo
rsu
pp
ort
ing
info
rmat
ion
nee
ds
of
pro
du
cers
, in
par
ticu
lar
smal
l-sc
ale
farm
ers
Mo
st in
dic
ated
rel
evan
t,b
ut
4 in
dic
ated
no
tre
leva
nt
incl
ud
ing
so
me
larg
e aq
uac
ult
ure
pro
du
cer
cou
ntr
ies
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
bu
dg
etan
d d
on
ors
Fish
tra
de
org
aniz
atio
ns
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
bu
dg
etan
d d
on
ors
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
Rep
ort
s o
n n
on
-tar
iffb
arri
ers
iden
tifie
sm
easu
res
to r
edu
ce a
nd
final
ly e
limin
ate
the
trad
e im
ped
ing
NTB
s
Rep
ort
s o
n c
om
plia
nce
wit
h r
egio
nal
an
d W
TOo
blig
atio
ns
An
alys
is a
nd
mo
nit
ori
ng
rep
ort
s o
n c
om
plia
nce
wit
h t
he
stan
dar
ds
Nu
mb
er/p
erce
nta
ge
of
com
pet
ent
auth
ori
tyan
d r
elev
ant
agen
cies
accr
edit
ed
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
5 in
dic
ated
no
tre
leva
nt
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edis
sue
rele
van
t, b
ut
5 in
dic
ated
no
t re
leva
nt
Mo
st in
dic
ated
rel
evan
t,b
ut
3 in
dic
ated
no
tre
leva
nt
3 to
5 y
ears
3 to
5 y
ears
3 to
5 y
ears
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
al
Nat
ion
al a
nd
Inte
rnat
ion
al
Nat
ion
al a
nd
Inte
rnat
ion
al
Nat
ion
al
Nat
ion
al b
ud
get
;in
tern
atio
nal
agen
cies
Mo
stly
nat
ion
alb
ud
get
; so
me
exte
rnal
do
no
rs
Nat
ion
al b
ud
get
;so
me
fro
md
on
ors
Nat
ion
al b
ud
get
;d
on
ors
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
25
Ou
tpu
t 1
.6 –
Reg
ion
al a
nd
pri
vate
sec
tor
colla
bo
rati
on
an
d c
oo
per
atio
n s
tren
gth
ened
Stre
ng
then
ed r
egio
nal
co
op
erat
ion
an
d i
ncr
ease
d s
yner
gie
s am
on
g t
he
pri
vate
sec
tor,
do
no
r an
d d
evel
op
men
t ag
enci
es, N
GO
s an
d o
ther
nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
al i
nst
itu
tio
ns
that
will
fac
ilita
te S
IA r
elat
ed t
rain
ing,
cap
acit
y b
uild
ing
, dem
on
stra
tio
n p
roje
cts,
R&
D, e
tc. I
mp
rove
d c
olla
bo
rati
on
an
d n
etw
ork
ing
bet
wee
n r
egio
nal
org
aniz
atio
ns
to e
nsu
re s
yner
gy
and
co
her
ence
. Inv
olv
emen
t o
f th
e p
riva
te s
ecto
r fa
cilit
ated
in
dec
isio
n-m
akin
g a
nd
par
tner
ship
wit
hg
ove
rnm
ent
and
un
iver
siti
es fo
r re
spo
nsi
ble
dev
elo
pm
ent
of
the
ind
ust
ry, e
.g. t
hro
ug
h t
he
dev
elo
pm
ent
of
pro
du
cer
org
aniz
atio
ns
and
ro
un
dta
ble
s.
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
1.6
.1 F
orm
a r
egio
nal
fed
erat
ion
of
pro
du
cers
’ org
aniz
atio
ns
as a
str
on
ger
sin
gle
vo
ice
for
the
sect
or
1.6
.2 P
rep
are
a re
gio
nal
res
earc
han
d d
evel
op
men
t p
lan
an
d d
eleg
ate
the
rese
arch
to
sp
ecifi
c in
stit
uti
on
s
1.6
.3 D
evel
op
an
d s
tren
gth
en t
he
net
wo
rk o
f re
gio
nal
tra
inin
g a
nd
edu
cati
on
pro
vid
ers
1.6
.4 M
ob
ilize
fu
nd
ing
for
dev
elo
pm
ent
assi
stan
ce f
rom
do
no
rsan
d in
tern
atio
nal
dev
elo
pm
ent
org
aniz
atio
ns
A r
egio
nal
fed
erat
ion
of
pro
du
cer
org
aniz
atio
ns
form
ed
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
inte
rest
ed, b
ut
6 n
ot
inte
rest
ed, i
ncl
ud
ing
som
e la
rger
aq
uac
ult
ure
cou
ntr
ies
3 to
5 y
ears
Reg
ion
alG
over
nm
ent
and
do
no
rsN
AC
A/p
riva
tese
cto
r
Nee
ds
asse
ssm
ent
rep
ort
of
reg
ion
al R
&D
un
der
take
n a
nd
pri
ori
tize
d
Nu
mb
er o
f sp
ecifi
cre
sear
ch p
rog
ram
mes
del
egat
ed
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
inte
rest
ed b
ut
6 n
ot
inte
rest
ed, i
ncl
ud
ing
som
e la
rger
aq
uac
ult
ure
cou
ntr
ies
1 to
2 y
ears
Reg
ion
alEx
tern
alSE
AFD
EC –
AQ
D
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
inte
rest
ed b
ut
6 n
ot
inte
rest
ed, i
ncl
ud
ing
som
e la
rger
aq
uac
ult
ure
cou
ntr
ies
3 to
5 y
ears
Reg
ion
alEx
tern
alSE
AFD
EC –
AQ
D &
NA
CA
A r
egio
nal
net
wo
rk o
ftr
ain
ing
an
d e
du
cati
on
pro
vid
ers
dev
elo
ped
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
inte
rest
ed, b
ut
5 ar
e n
ot
inte
rest
ed, i
ncl
ud
ing
som
e la
rger
aq
uac
ult
ure
cou
ntr
ies
3 to
5 y
ears
Reg
ion
alO
f th
e fe
wco
un
trie
s th
atp
rovi
ded
dat
am
ost
ho
pin
g fo
rex
tern
al f
un
ds
SEA
FDEC
–A
QD
& N
AC
A
Ass
essm
ent
rep
ort
on
pre
sen
t d
on
or
fun
ded
pro
ject
s an
d f
un
din
g
Nu
mb
er o
f n
ew p
roje
cts
form
ula
ted
for
futu
red
on
or
fun
din
g
No
res
po
nse
fro
m t
he
gov
ern
men
ts
3 to
5 y
ears
Reg
ion
alN
AC
A, d
on
ors
and
inte
rnat
ion
alo
rgan
izat
ion
s
No
res
po
nse
fro
mth
e g
ove
rnm
ents
26
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
1.6
.5 S
tren
gth
en li
nks
an
dco
nsu
ltat
ion
bet
wee
n p
riva
te s
ecto
ran
d g
over
nm
ent
and
ser
vice
pro
vid
ers
to im
pro
ve u
nd
erst
and
ing
of
thei
rn
eed
s an
d e
nco
ura
ge
thei
ren
gag
emen
t in
pla
nn
ing,
R&
D,
trai
nin
g, in
form
atio
n d
eliv
ery
and
oth
er s
up
po
rt s
ervi
ces
1.6
.6 R
evie
w a
nd
up
dat
e p
olic
ies
toen
cou
rag
e p
riva
te s
ecto
r in
vest
men
tin
to a
qu
acu
ltu
re
1.6
.7 D
evel
op
par
tner
ship
s to
Iden
tify
and
ad
dre
ss k
ey is
sues
of
the
sect
or
for
sust
ain
abili
ty
1.6
.8 C
on
nec
t p
riva
te s
ecto
r to
glo
bal
inn
ovat
ion
net
wo
rks
such
as
Glo
bal
Aq
uac
ult
ure
Ad
van
cem
ent
Part
ner
ship
(GA
AP)
Freq
uen
cy/n
um
ber
sPr
ivat
e se
cto
rin
volv
emen
t in
dec
isio
n-
mak
ing
pro
cess
Pres
ence
of
pri
vate
sect
or
in d
ecis
ion
-m
akin
g b
od
ies
All
cou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt
bu
t 3
cou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
ed n
ot
rele
van
t
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
bu
dg
etan
d/o
r d
on
ors
fun
ds
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
pro
du
cer
org
aniz
atio
ns
Revi
ew r
epo
rts
Nu
mb
er o
f p
olic
ies
up
dat
ed
Incr
ease
d In
vest
men
tfr
om
pri
vate
sec
tor
All
bu
t 3
cou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
ed r
elev
ant
1 to
2 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
bu
dg
et;
wit
h d
on
ors
/p
riva
te s
ecto
r in
som
e ca
ses
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
pro
du
cer
org
aniz
atio
ns
Nu
mb
er o
f M
OU
an
do
ther
form
s o
fp
artn
ersh
ips
esta
blis
hed
All
bu
t 5
cou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
ed r
elev
ant
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
alN
atio
nal
bu
dg
etan
d d
on
ors
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
NA
CA
Sub
stan
tial
par
tici
pat
ion
of
pri
vate
sec
tor
in t
he
glo
bal
inn
ovat
ion
net
wo
rks
All
bu
t 5
cou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
ed r
elev
ant
1 to
2 y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
alN
atio
nal
bu
dg
etan
d d
on
ors
Pro
du
cer
org
aniz
atio
ns
and
NA
CA
27
Ou
tco
me
2. E
ffec
tive
man
agem
ent
of
the
aqu
acu
ltu
re s
ecto
r
Effe
ctiv
e g
over
nan
ce t
hro
ug
h s
ou
nd
po
licie
s, st
rate
gie
s an
d a
ctio
n p
lan
s in
corp
ora
tin
g t
he
pri
nci
ple
s o
f an
eco
syst
em a
pp
roac
h t
o a
qu
acu
ltu
re a
nd
go
od
linka
ges
bet
wee
n g
ove
rnm
ent
po
licie
s an
d s
ust
ain
able
man
agem
ent
of
aqu
acu
ltu
re. I
nst
itu
tio
ns
stre
ng
then
ed, c
apac
ity
imp
rove
d a
nd
mo
re e
ffec
tive
mec
han
ism
s o
f g
ove
rnan
ce d
evel
op
ed, i
ncl
ud
ing
ru
les
and
reg
ula
tio
ns,
pla
nn
ing
an
d m
anag
emen
t to
get
her
wit
h v
olu
nta
ry c
od
es o
f p
ract
ices
, an
dre
spo
nsi
ble
sel
f-m
anag
emen
t.
Ou
tpu
t 2
.1 –
Aq
uac
ult
ure
reg
istr
atio
n a
nd
lice
nsi
ng
est
ablis
hed
an
d/o
r im
ple
men
ted
Ap
pro
pri
ate
syst
ems
and
mea
sure
s d
evel
op
ed a
nd
cap
acit
y b
uilt
for
the
enfo
rcem
ent
of
the
reg
istr
atio
n a
nd
lice
nsi
ng
to
en
sure
far
ms
at a
ll sc
ales
op
erat
ew
ith
in t
he
leg
al f
ram
ewo
rk.
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
2.1
.1 D
evel
op
sys
tem
s fo
r re
gis
trat
ion
and
lice
nsi
ng
of
aqu
acu
ltu
re f
arm
sin
clu
din
g e
stab
lish
ing
dat
abas
es a
nd
mo
nit
ori
ng
pro
ced
ure
s
2.1
.2 T
rain
sta
ff in
rel
evan
t au
tho
riti
esin
th
e re
gis
trat
ion
an
d li
cen
sin
g o
ffa
rms
Farm
dat
abas
ees
tab
lish
ed
Farm
s lic
ense
d
Farm
mo
nit
ori
ng
sys
tem
esta
blis
hed
Mo
st in
dic
ated
rel
evan
tu
sin
g a
ll 3
ind
icat
ors
;o
nly
2 c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
ed n
ot
rele
van
tM
alay
sia
has
est
ablis
hed
a fa
rm s
elf-
mo
nit
ori
ng
syst
em
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
bu
dg
etan
d d
on
ors
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
Nu
mb
er o
f st
aff
trai
ned
Farm
reg
istr
atio
n a
nd
licen
sin
g s
yste
mes
tab
lish
ed a
nd
ino
per
atio
n
Mo
st in
dic
ated
rel
evan
t;o
nly
2 c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
ed n
ot
rele
van
t
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
bu
dg
etan
d d
on
ors
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
SEA
FDEC
-AQ
D
28
Ou
tpu
t 2
.2 –
Res
po
nsi
ble
pro
du
ctio
n m
anag
emen
t p
rom
ote
d a
nd
mo
nit
ore
d
Res
po
nsi
ble
man
agem
ent
of
hu
sban
dry
, env
iro
nm
ent,
bio
secu
rity
an
d f
arm
gen
etic
res
ou
rces
pro
mo
ted
to
en
sure
su
stai
nab
le a
qu
acu
ltu
re in
ten
sific
atio
n.
Ap
pro
pri
ate
mo
nit
ori
ng,
rep
ort
ing
sys
tem
s an
d c
on
tro
l mea
sure
s im
ple
men
ted
to
en
sure
go
od
ste
war
dsh
ip a
nd
to
bu
ild p
ub
lic a
ccep
tan
ce o
f th
e in
du
stry
.
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
2.2
.1 P
rom
ote
man
agem
ent
thro
ug
h“f
arm
clu
ster
s”o
r o
ther
arr
ang
emen
tso
f fa
rms
2.2
.2 D
evel
op
an
d im
ple
men
tvo
lun
tary
co
des
of
pra
ctic
es fo
rre
spo
nsi
ble
sel
f-m
anag
emen
t
2.2
.3 E
stab
lish
/str
eng
then
nat
ion
alan
d r
egio
nal
fis
h h
ealt
h m
on
ito
rin
g,w
arn
ing
an
d r
esp
on
se s
yste
ms
for
maj
or
and
em
erg
ing
dis
ease
s
2.2
.4 D
evel
op
reg
ion
al c
olla
bo
rati
on
and
co
op
erat
ion
or
aqu
atic
an
imal
hea
lth
man
agem
ent
Farm
are
a/cl
ust
erm
anag
emen
tA
gre
emen
ts fo
rb
iose
curi
ty a
nd
envi
ron
men
tal
pro
tect
ion
in o
per
atio
n
All
exce
pt
3 co
un
trie
sin
dic
ated
rel
evan
t3
to 5
yea
rsN
atio
nal
Gov
ern
men
t; FA
Oan
d d
on
ors
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
Volu
nta
ry c
od
es o
fp
ract
ices
dev
elo
ped
Farm
ers
imp
lem
enti
ng
volu
nta
ry c
od
es o
fp
ract
ices
Mo
nit
ori
ng,
war
nin
gan
d r
esp
on
se s
yste
ms
ino
per
atio
n a
t th
ere
gio
nal
an
d n
atio
nal
leve
ls
Zon
al m
anag
emen
t o
fB
iose
curi
ty in
op
erat
ion
No
tific
atio
n n
etw
ork
for
occ
urr
ence
of
no
tifia
ble
dis
ease
s es
tab
lish
ed
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt
bu
t 7
ind
icat
edn
ot
rele
van
t
All
exce
pt
2 co
un
trie
sin
dic
ated
rel
evan
t
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
al
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
al
Mo
st g
over
nm
ent
and
do
no
rfu
nd
ing
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
anim
al h
ealt
hag
ency
Reg
ion
al a
qu
acu
ltu
reb
iose
curi
ty p
lan
sd
evel
op
ed a
nd
imp
lem
ente
d
All
exce
pt
3 co
un
trie
sin
dic
ated
rel
evan
t5+
yea
rsN
atio
nal
Nat
ion
al b
ud
get
and
do
no
rsN
atio
nal
aqu
acu
ltu
reag
ency
an
dre
gio
nal
org
aniz
atio
ns
No
res
po
nse
fro
mth
e g
ove
rnm
ents
29
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
2.2
.5 D
evel
op
/en
forc
e th
e re
gu
lati
on
so
n t
he
intr
od
uct
ion
an
d t
ran
sfer
of
aqu
atic
org
anis
ms,
incl
ud
ing
th
e ri
sks
of
esca
pee
s (a
lien
/inv
asiv
e, o
rd
om
esti
cate
d, r
elea
se o
f g
amet
es e
.g.
biv
alve
s)
2.2
.6 D
evel
op
an
d p
rom
ote
bet
ter
pra
ctic
es fo
r en
viro
nm
enta
lm
anag
emen
t
2.2
.7 D
evel
op
an
d im
ple
men
ten
viro
nm
enta
l man
agem
ent
pla
ns
bas
ed o
n t
he
envi
ron
men
tal i
mp
act
asse
ssm
ent
stu
die
s
2.2
.8 D
evel
op
an
d im
ple
men
t fa
rmef
fluen
t d
isch
arg
e st
and
ard
ses
pec
ially
for
inte
nsi
ve a
qu
acu
ltu
reb
ased
on
an
EA
A a
pp
roac
h
Nat
ion
al q
uar
anti
ne
syst
em in
pla
ce o
rst
ren
gth
ened
Tran
sbo
un
dar
ym
ovem
ents
mo
nit
ore
dan
d c
on
tro
lled
Ris
k as
sess
men
ts t
oo
lsav
aila
ble
for
intr
od
uct
ion
s/m
ovem
ents
an
des
cap
ees
Hea
lth
cer
tific
atio
n fo
rliv
e fis
h t
ran
sfer
s an
dim
po
rts
imp
lem
ente
d
All
exce
pt
2 co
un
trie
sin
dic
ated
rel
evan
t;2
sug
ges
ted
it is
no
tre
leva
nt
to t
hei
r n
eed
s/p
lan
s
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
bu
dg
etan
d d
on
ors
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
envi
ron
men
tal
agen
cy
Bet
ter
pra
ctic
es fo
ren
viro
nm
enta
lm
anag
emen
t d
evel
op
edan
d im
ple
men
ted
All
exce
pt
2 co
un
trie
sin
dic
ated
rel
evan
t3
to 5
yea
rsN
atio
nal
Nat
ion
al b
ud
get
and
do
no
rsN
atio
nal
aqu
acu
ltu
reag
ency
an
dN
AC
A
Envi
ron
men
tal
man
agem
ent
pla
ns
imp
lem
ente
d
Rep
ort
s o
nen
viro
nm
enta
lm
on
ito
rin
g s
urv
eys
5 o
f 16
co
un
trie
sin
dic
ated
no
t re
leva
nt;
11 in
dic
ated
rel
evan
t
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
bu
dg
etan
d d
on
ors
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
envi
ron
men
tal
agen
cy
Stan
dar
ds
for
farm
efflu
ent
dis
char
ge
esta
blis
hed
an
den
forc
ed
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
3 in
dic
ated
no
tre
leva
nt
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
bu
dg
etan
d d
on
ors
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
envi
ron
men
tal
agen
cy
30
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
2.2
.9 M
on
ito
r en
viro
nm
enta
l im
pac
to
f aq
uac
ult
ure
on
env
iro
nm
ent
and
dev
elo
p a
nd
en
forc
e m
itig
atio
nm
easu
res
to r
edu
ce im
pac
t o
faq
uac
ult
ure
are
as/f
arm
s o
nen
viro
nm
ent
2.2
.10
Dev
elo
p a
nd
dis
sem
inat
eg
uid
elin
es fo
r p
rom
oti
on
of
Inte
gra
ted
Mu
lti-
Tro
ph
ic A
qu
acu
ltu
re(IM
TA) a
nd
inte
gra
ted
ag
ricu
ltu
re-
aqu
acu
ltu
re s
yste
ms)
Mo
nit
ori
ng
rep
ort
s o
nen
viro
nm
enta
l im
pac
tso
f aq
uac
ult
ure
Mit
igat
ion
mea
sure
sd
evel
op
ed a
nd
ap
plie
d
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
4 in
dic
ated
no
tre
leva
nt
3 to
5m
on
ito
rin
gre
po
rts;
1 to
3 m
itig
atio
nm
easu
res
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
bu
dg
etan
d d
on
ors
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
envi
ron
men
tal
agen
cy
Pilo
t d
emo
nst
rati
on
pro
ject
s im
ple
men
ted
Gu
idel
ines
dev
elo
ped
and
dis
sem
inat
ed
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
3 su
gg
este
dn
ot
rele
van
t
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
alN
AC
A a
nd
nat
ion
alre
sear
chag
enci
es
Nat
ion
al, p
riva
tese
ctor
,in
tern
atio
nal
do
no
rs
Ou
tpu
t 2
.3 –
Ap
pro
pri
ate
cert
ific
atio
n a
nd
sta
nd
ard
s es
tab
lish
ed a
nd
imp
lem
ente
d
Ap
pro
pri
ate
nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
al c
erti
ficat
ion
sch
emes
, sta
nd
ard
s an
d b
est
pra
ctic
es a
re e
stab
lish
ed a
nd
eff
ecti
vely
im
ple
men
ted
wit
h p
rovi
sio
ns
for
reco
gn
itio
n o
f eq
uiv
alen
cy t
o im
pro
ve s
ecto
ral s
ust
ain
abili
ty.
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
2.3
.1 D
evel
op
an
d im
ple
men
tn
atio
nal
sch
emes
for
Go
od
Aq
uac
ult
ure
Pra
ctic
es (G
Aq
Ps) f
or
key
cult
ure
sys
tem
s/co
mm
od
itie
sco
nsi
sten
t w
ith
FA
O T
G fo
raq
uac
ult
ure
cer
tific
atio
n
2.3
.2 C
on
du
ct b
ench
mar
kin
g o
fex
isti
ng
aq
uac
ult
ure
cer
tific
atio
nsc
hem
es a
nd
sta
nd
ard
s fo
r co
mm
on
com
mo
dit
ies/
syst
ems
usi
ng
FA
Oev
alu
atio
n f
ram
ewo
rk fo
r m
utu
alre
cog
nit
ion
Nat
ion
al G
Aq
Ps o
req
uiv
alen
t im
ple
men
ted
Nat
ion
al G
Aq
Psst
and
ard
s h
arm
on
ized
at r
egio
nal
leve
l
All
cou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
alN
atio
nal
bu
dg
et+
do
no
rsN
atio
nal
aqu
acu
ltu
reag
ency
All
cou
ntr
ies
exce
pt
4 in
dic
ated
rel
evan
t
Nat
ion
al c
erti
ficat
ion
sch
emes
an
d s
tan
dar
ds
ben
chm
arke
d o
n t
hei
rco
nfo
rmit
y w
ith
FA
O T
G
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
bu
dg
etan
d d
on
ors
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
31
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
2.3
.3 D
evel
op
an
d im
ple
men
tsy
stem
s fo
r ac
cred
itat
ion
of
inp
ut
sup
plie
rs a
nd
ser
vice
pro
vid
ers
2.3
.4 D
evel
op
/pro
mo
te g
rou
pce
rtifi
cati
on
for
clu
ster
s o
f sm
all-
scal
efa
rmer
s
2.3
.5 P
rom
ote
org
anic
far
min
g a
nd
rela
ted
cer
tific
atio
n
Inp
ut
sup
plie
rsac
cred
ited
/cer
tifie
dM
any
cou
ntr
ies
sug
ges
ted
rel
evan
t, b
ut
6 in
dic
ated
no
t re
leva
nt
1 to
2 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
bu
dg
etan
d d
on
ors
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
Farm
er g
rou
ps/
clu
ster
sce
rtifi
edM
ost
co
un
trie
ssu
gg
este
d r
elev
ant,
bu
t4
ind
icat
ed n
ot
rele
van
t
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
bu
dg
etan
d d
on
ors
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
Cer
tific
atio
n s
chem
esav
aila
ble
for
org
anic
pro
du
cts
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
sug
ges
ted
rel
evan
t, b
ut
4 in
dic
ated
no
t re
leva
nt
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
bu
dg
etan
d d
on
ors
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy, s
oil
asso
ciat
ion
Ou
tpu
t 2
.4 –
Far
mer
acc
ess
to f
inan
cin
g, c
red
it a
nd
insu
ran
ce im
pro
ved
Fin
anci
ng
an
d i
nfr
astr
uct
ura
l su
pp
ort
pro
vid
ed t
o a
qu
a-fa
rmer
s an
d p
rod
uce
r o
rgan
izat
ion
s to
en
able
co
mp
lian
ce w
ith
reg
ula
tio
ns
and
th
e p
ract
ice
of
resp
on
sib
le a
qu
acu
ltu
re. M
icro
-fin
anci
ng
mec
han
ism
s d
evel
op
ed t
o h
elp
mar
gin
al f
arm
ers
gai
n a
cces
s to
fin
anci
al c
red
its.
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
2.4
.1 P
rovi
de
info
rmat
ion
on
tec
hn
ical
and
eco
no
mic
feas
ibili
ty a
nd
ris
kre
late
d t
o in
ten
sifie
d a
qu
acu
ltu
re t
ob
anks
/lo
an p
rovi
der
s
2.4
.2 D
evel
op
to
ols
for
asse
ssin
gfin
anci
al r
isk
of
farm
bo
rrow
ing
for
inte
nsi
fied
aq
uac
ult
ure
Ban
ks/l
oan
pro
vid
ers
cap
able
of
asse
ssin
gaq
uac
ult
ure
loan
app
licat
ion
s an
d w
illin
gto
fin
ance
inte
nsi
fied
aqu
acu
ltu
re b
ased
on
thei
r an
alys
is
All
bu
t 4
cou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
ed r
elev
ant
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
bu
dg
etan
d d
on
ors
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy,
Dev
elo
pm
ent
ban
ks,
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral
ban
ks
Too
ls a
vaila
ble
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
6 in
dic
ated
no
tre
leva
nt
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
al/r
egio
nal
Nat
ion
al b
ud
get
and
do
no
rsN
atio
nal
an
dre
gio
nal
org
aniz
atio
n
32
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
2.4
.3 M
ake
loan
s av
aila
ble
to
sm
all-
scal
e aq
uac
ult
ure
far
mer
s th
rou
gh
colla
tera
l gu
aran
tees
2.4
.4 M
ake
sto
ck in
sura
nce
sch
emes
avai
lab
le fo
r sm
all t
o m
ediu
m s
ized
farm
ers.
Farm
ers
acce
ssed
loan
thro
ug
h c
olla
tera
lg
uar
ante
es
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
al b
ud
get
and
do
no
rsN
atio
nal
aqu
acu
ltu
reag
ency
,In
sura
nce
com
pan
ies
Sto
ck in
sura
nce
sch
emes
dev
elo
ped
an
dre
adily
ava
ilab
le
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
al b
ud
get
and
do
no
rsN
atio
nal
gov
ern
men
tan
d in
sura
nce
Ou
tpu
t 2
.5 –
Org
aniz
atio
n (
clu
ster
s, c
oo
per
ativ
es, a
sso
ciat
ion
s et
c.)
of
smal
l-sc
ale
pro
du
cers
pro
mo
ted
Esta
blis
hm
ent
of
farm
er g
rou
ps,
clu
ster
s an
d a
sso
ciat
ion
s en
cou
rag
ed a
nd
ass
ista
nce
pro
vid
ed t
o o
rgan
ize
trai
nin
g in
man
agem
ent
and
tec
hn
ical
ski
lls a
nd
in b
ette
r m
anag
emen
t p
ract
ices
(BM
Ps) i
n s
ust
ain
able
inte
nsi
ficat
ion
of a
qu
acu
ltu
re, c
erti
ficat
ion
, env
iro
nm
enta
l sta
nd
ard
s, fo
od
saf
ety
stan
dar
ds,
trac
eab
ility
etc.
Dev
elo
pm
ent
of
farm
er g
rou
ps
enco
ura
ged
for
clu
ster
s o
f sm
all-
scal
e fa
rmer
s an
d t
he
ado
pti
on
of
rele
van
t B
MPs
an
d p
oss
ibly
clu
ster
cer
tific
atio
n.
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
2.5
.1 A
do
pt
exis
tin
g g
uid
elin
es fo
rth
e fo
rmat
ion
an
d m
anag
emen
t o
ffa
rmer
gro
up
s
2.5
.2 S
up
po
rt f
arm
er o
rgan
izat
ion
s in
imp
lem
enta
tio
n o
f B
MPs
cer
tific
atio
nan
d m
arke
tin
g c
olle
ctiv
ely
Gu
idel
ines
an
dad
min
istr
ativ
ep
roce
du
res
dev
elo
ped
Farm
er a
sso
ciat
ion
s an
dn
um
ber
of
farm
erg
rou
ps
form
edac
cord
ing
to
gu
idel
ines
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
4 in
dic
ated
no
tre
leva
nt
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
on
ly3
ind
icat
ed n
ot
rele
van
t
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
on
ly3
ind
icat
ed n
ot
rele
van
t
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
an
d f
arm
org
aniz
atio
ns
Nat
ion
al a
nd
loca
lg
over
nm
ent
and
NG
Os
Farm
er g
rou
ps
dev
elo
ped
an
d/
imp
rove
d a
cco
rdin
g t
og
uid
elin
es t
o im
ple
men
tB
MPs
, pro
du
ctce
rtifi
cati
on
an
dco
llab
ora
tive
mar
keti
ng
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
4 in
dic
ated
no
tre
leva
nt
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
an
d f
arm
org
aniz
atio
ns
Nat
ion
al a
nd
loca
lg
over
nm
ent
and
NG
Os
Nat
ion
al
Nat
ion
al
33
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
2.5
.3 P
rom
ote
tec
hn
olo
gy
tran
sfer
and
ad
op
tio
n, i
nfo
rmat
ion
dis
sem
inat
ion
, an
d t
rain
ing
th
rou
gh
farm
ers
org
aniz
atio
ns
Tech
no
log
ies
tran
sfer
red
and
ad
op
ted
th
rou
gh
farm
er o
rgan
izat
ion
s
Typ
es o
f in
form
atio
nd
isse
min
ated
th
rou
gh
farm
er o
rgan
izat
ion
s
Trai
nin
g p
rog
ram
mes
on
aqu
acu
ltu
re o
per
atio
ns
con
du
cted
th
rou
gh
farm
er o
rgan
izat
ion
s
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
bu
t 5
ind
icat
edn
ot
rele
van
t
Med
ium
to
lon
g t
erm
(dep
end
s o
nle
vel o
faq
uac
ult
ure
deve
lopm
ent
in e
ach
cou
ntr
y)
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
alN
atio
nal
go
vern
men
tsp
riva
te s
ecto
r,d
on
ors
Nat
ion
al a
nd
loca
lg
over
nm
ent
and
NG
Os
FAO
/NA
CA
Ou
tco
me
3. I
mp
rove
d m
anag
emen
t al
on
g t
he
aqu
acu
ltu
re v
alu
e ch
ain
Go
od
man
agem
ent
is e
ffec
tive
ly im
ple
men
ted
by
all s
take
ho
lder
s al
on
g t
he
aqu
acu
ltu
re v
alu
e ch
ain
, wh
ich
cov
ers
go
od
pro
du
ctio
n p
ract
ices
, qu
alit
y co
ntr
ol
and
per
form
ance
ass
essm
ent
for
all u
pst
ream
inp
uts
, pro
du
ctio
n a
nd
dow
nst
ream
ou
tpu
ts, e
mp
has
izin
g e
ffic
ien
t re
sou
rce
use
, im
pro
ved
pro
du
ctiv
ity
and
eco
no
mic
eff
icie
ncy
an
d s
ou
nd
so
cial
an
d e
nvir
on
men
tal b
enef
it in
th
e p
roce
ss o
f in
ten
sific
atio
n.
Ou
tpu
t 3
.1 –
Man
agem
ent
pra
ctic
es in
pro
du
ctio
n a
nd
dis
trib
uti
on
of
aqu
acu
ltu
re s
eed
s im
pro
ved
Ap
pro
pri
ate
mec
han
ism
s fo
r g
oo
d p
ract
ice,
qu
alit
y co
ntr
ol a
nd
mo
nit
ori
ng
of a
qu
acu
ltu
re s
eed
pro
du
ctio
n e
stab
lish
ed. N
atio
nal
pro
gra
mm
e fo
r th
e g
enet
icse
lect
ion
an
d m
anag
emen
t o
f b
roo
dst
ock
s d
evel
op
ed.
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
3.1
.1 F
acili
tate
go
od
gen
etic
man
agem
ent
of
bro
od
sto
cks
and
effe
ctiv
e d
istr
ibu
tio
n o
f im
pro
ved
bro
od
sto
ck
Nat
ion
al p
rog
ram
mes
for
bro
od
sto
ck g
enet
icm
anag
emen
t d
evel
op
edan
d im
ple
men
ted
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
3 in
dic
ated
no
tre
leva
nt
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
bu
dg
etan
d e
xter
nal
fun
ds
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
34
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
3.1
.2 F
acili
tate
th
e in
tro
du
ctio
n a
nd
effe
ctiv
e m
anag
emen
t an
dd
istr
ibu
tio
n o
f g
enet
ical
ly im
pro
ved
stra
ins
3.1
.3 E
stab
lish
reg
ion
al a
nd
nat
ion
aln
etw
ork
s fo
r b
roo
dst
ock
imp
rove
men
tco
mp
risi
ng
of
gov
ern
men
tin
stit
uti
on
s, co
mm
erci
al/p
riva
te s
ecto
r,h
atch
erie
s at
var
iou
s sc
ales
3.1
.4 P
rom
ote
an
d e
nab
le p
ub
licp
riva
te p
artn
ersh
ip (P
PP) i
n g
enet
icim
pro
vem
ent
of
bro
od
sto
ck in
aqu
acu
ltu
re
3.1
.5 D
evel
op
cer
tific
atio
n s
chem
efo
r b
roo
dst
ock
, see
d a
nd
hat
cher
ies
3.1
.6 E
nsu
re s
uff
icie
nt
pro
du
ctio
no
f g
oo
d q
ual
ity
seed
Syst
ems
for
mai
nte
nan
ce a
nd
effe
ctiv
e d
istr
ibu
tio
n o
fg
enet
ical
ly im
pro
ved
stra
ins
in p
lace
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
3 in
dic
ated
no
tre
leva
nt
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
bu
dg
et,
pri
vate
sec
tor
and
exte
rnal
fu
nd
s
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
Nat
ion
al n
etw
ork
of
bro
od
sto
ck c
entr
eses
tab
lish
ed
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
4 in
dic
ated
no
tre
leva
nt
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
bu
dg
etan
d e
xter
nal
fun
ds
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
PPP
for
bro
od
sto
ckim
pro
vem
ent
esta
blis
hed
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
5 in
dic
ated
no
tre
leva
nt
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
bu
dg
et,
pri
vate
sec
tor
and
exte
rnal
in s
om
eca
ses
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
pro
du
cer
org
aniz
atio
ns
Cer
tific
atio
n s
chem
es fo
rb
roo
dst
ock
, see
d a
nd
hat
cher
ies
esta
blis
hed
and
imp
lem
ente
d
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
5 in
dic
ated
no
tre
leva
nt
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
bu
dg
etan
d d
on
ors
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
Hat
cher
y g
uid
elin
esd
evel
op
ed
Hat
cher
ies/
nu
rser
ies
up
gra
ded
Hat
cher
y/n
urs
ery
staf
ftr
ain
ed
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edve
ry r
elev
ant;
on
ly1
cou
ntr
y in
dic
ated
no
tre
leva
nt
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
bu
dg
etan
d d
on
ors
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
pro
du
cer
org
aniz
atio
ns
35
Ou
tpu
t 3
.2 –
Pro
du
ctio
n a
nd
dis
trib
uti
on
of
qu
alit
y aq
uac
ult
ure
fee
d im
pro
ved
A n
atio
nal
mec
han
ism
est
ablis
hed
fo
r fe
ed q
ual
ity
con
tro
l an
d t
o p
rom
ote
th
e u
se o
f al
tern
ativ
e p
rote
in s
ou
rces
to
red
uce
dep
end
ence
on
fis
hm
eal a
nd
fish
oil
in a
qu
acu
ltu
re.
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
3.2
.1 E
stab
lish
nat
ion
al m
ech
anis
mfo
r fe
ed q
ual
ity
con
tro
l
3.2
.2 P
rom
ote
use
of
alte
rnat
ive
pro
tein
so
urc
es t
o r
edu
ce t
he
dep
end
ence
of
aqu
acu
ltu
re o
nfis
hm
eal a
nd
fis
h o
il
Nat
ion
al fe
ed s
tan
dar
ds
dev
elo
ped
an
dim
ple
men
ted
Reg
ula
tio
n s
yste
m in
pla
ce
Rele
van
t fo
r m
ost
cou
ntr
ies;
5 s
ug
ges
ted
no
t re
leva
nt
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alG
over
nm
ent
and
exte
rnal
fu
nd
sN
atio
nal
aqu
acu
ltu
reag
ency
Red
uct
ion
of
use
of
fish
mea
lRe
leva
nt
for
mo
stco
un
trie
s; 3
su
gg
este
dn
ot
rele
van
t
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
alG
over
nm
ent,
pri
vate
sec
tor
and
exte
rnal
fu
nd
s
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
feed
mill
ers
Ou
tpu
t 3
.3 –
Pro
du
ctiv
ity
and
eco
no
mic
eff
icie
ncy
imp
rove
d
Faci
litat
e im
pro
ved
far
mer
pro
fitab
ility
an
d f
arm
pro
du
ctiv
ity
thro
ug
h i
mp
rove
d m
eth
od
olo
gy,
hea
lth
man
agem
ent
and
fee
din
g p
ract
ice
and
in
ten
sify
assi
stan
ce t
o s
mal
l-sca
le f
arm
ers,
reco
gn
izin
g t
hat
th
ey a
re t
he
mo
st v
uln
erab
le t
o im
pac
ts o
f n
atu
ral a
nd
eco
no
mic
ris
ks. E
ffic
ien
t tr
ansf
er o
f ap
pro
pri
ate
sust
ain
able
tec
hn
olo
gie
s. Re
du
ce r
isk
at t
he
farm
leve
l th
rou
gh
res
po
nsi
ble
hea
lth
man
agem
ent,
bio
secu
rity
an
d e
nvir
on
men
tal m
anag
emen
t p
lan
s.
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
3.3
.1 D
evel
op
ap
pro
pri
ate
tech
no
log
yan
d p
rod
uct
ion
met
ho
do
log
y an
dfin
d e
ffic
ien
t m
eth
od
s fo
r te
chn
olo
gy
tran
sfer
Ap
pro
pri
ate
tech
no
log
ies
dev
elo
ped
and
ad
apte
d b
y sm
all-
scal
e fa
rms
Path
way
s fo
r tr
ansf
er o
fte
chn
olo
gie
s an
din
cen
tive
s fo
r in
nov
atio
nat
loca
l lev
el id
enti
fied
This
act
ivit
y re
leva
nt
for
mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies;
3 su
gg
este
d n
ot
rele
van
t
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
go
vern
men
ts w
ith
pri
vate
sec
tor
sup
po
rt
NA
CA
36
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
Imp
rove
d t
ech
no
log
ytr
ansf
ers
do
cum
ente
dan
d d
isse
min
ated
inSI
As
33 3.3
.2 D
ocu
men
t In
dig
eno
us
Tech
nic
alK
no
wle
dg
e (IT
Ks)
for
wid
ed
isse
min
atio
n
3.3
.3 P
rom
ote
go
od
aq
uac
ult
ure
man
agem
ent
pra
ctic
es fo
r im
pro
ved
pro
du
ctio
n e
ffic
ien
cy, h
ealt
h,
bio
secu
rity
an
d e
nvir
on
men
tal b
enef
itan
d u
pd
ated
reg
ula
rly,
incl
ud
ing
use
of
go
od
qu
alit
y fe
ed a
nd
eff
icie
nt
feed
ing
str
ateg
ies/
pra
ctic
es
3.3
.4 P
rom
ote
th
e re
spo
nsi
ble
use
of
fert
ilize
rs a
nd
bio
cid
es in
po
nd
pre
par
atio
n
3.3
.5 S
up
po
rt a
nd
en
cou
rag
eap
plic
atio
n o
f fa
rm b
usi
nes
s p
lan
nin
gan
d m
anag
emen
t, an
d r
eco
rdke
epin
g
Ind
igen
ou
s Te
chn
ical
Kn
ow
led
ge
(ITK
s)ca
ptu
red
an
dd
ocu
men
ted
GA
qPs
for
maj
or
aqu
acu
ltu
reco
mm
od
itie
s d
evel
op
edan
d im
ple
men
ted
Gu
idel
ines
on
imp
rove
dfe
edin
g m
anag
emen
td
evel
op
ed a
nd
imp
lem
ente
d
Farm
ers
trai
ned
FCR
red
uce
d
Rele
van
t fo
r 9
cou
ntr
ies;
7 su
gg
este
d n
ot
rele
van
t5+
yea
rsN
atio
nal
Nat
ion
alg
ove
rnm
ents
wit
h e
xter
nal
sup
po
rt
Nat
ion
al R
&D
inst
itu
tio
ns
Rele
van
t fo
r14
co
un
trie
s; o
nly
2 su
gg
este
d n
ot
rele
van
t
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
alEx
tern
al f
un
din
gN
atio
nal
aqu
acu
ltu
reag
ency
Gu
idel
ines
on
imp
rove
dfe
rtili
zer
use
an
d p
on
dp
rep
arat
ion
an
dm
anag
emen
t d
evel
op
ed
Rele
van
t fo
r 11
co
un
trie
s;5
sug
ges
ted
no
t re
leva
nt
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
go
vern
men
tsw
ith
ext
ern
alsu
pp
ort
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
Farm
ers
trai
ned
in f
arm
pla
nn
ing
an
dm
anag
emen
t an
dre
cord
kee
pin
g
Bu
sin
ess
trai
nin
gm
od
ule
s d
evel
op
ed
Rele
van
t fo
r m
ost
cou
ntr
ies;
on
ly2
ind
icat
ed n
ot
rele
van
t
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
go
vern
men
tsw
ith
ext
ern
alsu
pp
ort
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
37
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
3.3
.6 F
acili
tate
th
e tr
ansf
er a
nd
ado
pti
on
of
sust
ain
able
aq
uac
ult
ure
tech
no
log
ies
3.3
.7 U
pg
rad
e cu
ltu
re f
acili
ties
to
imp
rove
pro
du
ctio
n a
nd
incr
ease
dp
rod
uct
ivit
y
Path
way
s o
f su
stai
nab
leaq
uac
ult
ure
tech
no
log
ies
for
smal
l-sc
ale
fish
far
mer
sid
enti
fied
an
dp
rom
ote
d
Rele
van
t fo
r m
ost
cou
ntr
ies;
on
ly3
ind
icat
ed n
ot
rele
van
t
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
go
vern
men
ts w
ith
exte
rnal
su
pp
ort
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
SEA
FDEC
/AQ
D
Farm
s w
ith
fac
iliti
esu
pg
rad
edRe
leva
nt
for
mo
stco
un
trie
s; o
nly
3 in
dic
ated
no
t re
leva
nt
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
go
vern
men
ts w
ith
exte
rnal
su
pp
ort
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
Ou
tpu
t 3
.4 –
Man
agem
ent
of
po
st-h
arve
st p
roce
ssin
g a
nd
mar
keti
ng
imp
rove
d
Ap
pro
pri
ate
mec
han
ism
s es
tab
lish
ed f
or
imp
rove
d e
ffic
ien
cy, q
ual
ity
con
tro
l an
d m
on
ito
rin
g o
f al
l do
wn
stre
am in
pu
ts a
lon
g t
he
aqu
acu
ltu
re v
alu
e ch
ain
to s
up
po
rt t
he
valu
e-ad
ded
pro
cess
ing
an
d p
rod
uct
inn
ovat
ion
nec
essa
ry t
o c
reat
e ad
dit
ion
al o
nsh
ore
job
s an
d s
up
ply
ch
ain
act
ivit
ies.
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
3.4
.1 Im
pro
ve f
arm
han
dlin
g a
nd
cold
ch
ain
man
agem
ent
to r
edu
cep
ost
-har
vest
loss
es a
nd
en
sure
foo
dsa
fety
3.4
.2 Im
pro
ve p
rod
uct
qu
alit
yp
rese
rvat
ion
(su
ch a
s ic
ing
an
dre
frig
erat
ion
) an
d m
ake
acce
ssib
leto
far
mer
s
Maj
or
cau
ses
of
po
st-h
arve
st lo
ssid
enti
fied
Gu
idel
ines
dev
elo
ped
to
red
uce
loss
Stak
eho
lder
s tr
ain
ed
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
4 in
dic
ated
no
tre
leva
nt
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
alG
over
nm
ent
and
exte
rnal
fu
nd
ing
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
SEA
FDEC
/AQ
D
Imp
rove
d s
up
ply
of
ice
Incr
ease
d n
um
ber
of
refr
iger
ated
tra
nsp
ort
and
sto
rag
e fa
cilit
ies
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
6 in
dic
ated
no
tre
leva
nt
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
alG
over
nm
ent
and
exte
rnal
fu
nd
ing
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
38
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
3.4
.3 R
edu
ce n
egat
ive
imp
acts
of
pro
cess
ing
was
tes
and
pro
mo
te v
alu
ere
cove
ry f
rom
was
tes
Imp
acts
fro
mp
ost
-har
vest
pro
cess
esid
enti
fied
Ap
pro
pri
ate
rem
edia
lte
chn
olo
gie
s ad
op
ted
Valu
e-ad
ded
pro
du
cts
dev
elo
ped
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
4 in
dic
ated
no
tre
leva
nt
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
alG
over
nm
ent
and
exte
rnal
fu
nd
ing
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
Ou
tpu
t 3
.5 –
Eff
ecti
ve s
up
ply
ch
ain
est
ablis
hed
an
d m
anag
emen
t im
pro
ved
Mea
sure
s d
evel
op
ed a
nd
imp
lem
ente
d t
o im
pro
ve t
he
valu
e ch
ain
to
infu
se s
oci
al r
esp
on
sib
ility
, pro
vid
e ad
ded
val
ue
and
incr
ease
eff
icie
nci
es a
nd
inco
mes
alo
ng
th
e va
lue
chai
n in
clu
din
g s
mal
l pro
du
cers
an
d p
roce
sso
rs.
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
3.5
.1 Im
pro
ve e
ffic
ien
cy a
lon
g t
he
valu
e ch
ain
su
ch a
s te
chn
ical
an
dec
on
om
ic in
effic
ien
cies
in fe
ed a
nd
seed
pro
du
ctio
n a
nd
dis
trib
uti
on
an
din
far
m p
rod
uct
ion
an
d p
rod
uct
mar
keti
ng
an
d d
istr
ibu
tio
n in
ord
er t
oim
pro
ve t
he
pro
fitab
ility
of
farm
ers
3.5
.2 S
trea
mlin
e lo
gis
tics
to
imp
rove
acce
ss o
f fa
rmer
s to
inp
uts
of
suff
icie
nt
qu
anti
ty a
nd
qu
anti
ty
Are
as fo
r im
pro
vem
ent
iden
tifie
d
Gu
idel
ines
dev
elo
ped
Stak
eho
lder
s tr
ain
ed
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
aqu
acu
ltu
reag
ency
Ava
ilab
ility
of
go
od
sim
pro
ved
Farm
s w
ith
imp
rove
dac
cess
ibili
ty
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
aqu
acu
ltu
reag
ency
No
res
po
nse
fro
m t
he
gov
ern
men
ts
No
res
po
nse
fro
m t
he
gov
ern
men
ts
No
res
po
nse
fro
mth
e g
ove
rnm
ents
No
res
po
nse
fro
mth
e g
ove
rnm
ents
39
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
3.5
.3 A
sses
s th
e ac
cess
of
smal
l-sc
ale
pro
du
cers
to
loca
l mar
kets
an
dp
roce
sso
rs a
nd
mid
dle
man
mar
k-u
pp
rofit
s an
d r
eco
mm
end
co
llab
ora
tive
mea
sure
s
3.5
.4 P
rom
ote
val
ue-
add
ed p
rod
uct
sto
cre
ate
ind
ust
ries
an
d e
mp
loym
ent
Ass
essm
ent
rep
ort
s
Farm
ers
wit
h im
pro
ved
acce
ss t
o m
arke
ts a
nd
mar
ket
info
rmat
ion
Mar
ket
info
rmat
ion
chan
nel
s an
d s
ervi
cees
tab
lish
ed in
co
un
trie
s
Smal
l-sc
ale
farm
ers
wit
him
pro
ved
pro
fit m
arg
inth
rou
gh
ch
ang
ing
fro
mp
rice
-tak
ers
to p
rice
-se
tter
s
Farm
ers’
coo
per
ativ
esfo
rmed
for
mar
keti
ng
and
inp
ut
sou
rcin
g
Farm
ers
ben
efit
ed f
rom
org
aniz
ed m
arke
tin
g o
fp
rod
uct
s (f
arm
ers’
coo
per
ativ
e w
ith
tra
der
s,g
over
nm
ent)
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
go
vern
men
tsN
atio
nal
aqu
acu
ltu
reag
ency
Perc
enta
ge
of
pro
du
cts
wit
h v
alu
e ad
ded
Ad
dit
ion
al e
mp
loym
ent
esp
ecia
lly fo
r w
om
en
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
aqu
acu
ltu
reag
ency
No
res
po
nse
fro
m t
he
gov
ern
men
ts
No
res
po
nse
fro
m t
he
gov
ern
men
tsN
o r
esp
on
se f
rom
the
go
vern
men
ts
40
Ou
tco
me
4. I
mp
rove
d c
apac
ity
for
sup
po
rtin
g s
ervi
ces
Imp
rove
d c
apac
ity
for
sup
por
tin
g s
ervi
ces
to s
ust
ain
able
inte
nsi
ficat
ion
of a
qu
acu
ltu
re t
hro
ug
h s
tren
gth
ened
tar
get
ed r
esea
rch
an
d t
ech
nol
ogy
dev
elop
men
tan
d d
isse
min
atio
n, e
ffec
tive
tra
inin
g a
nd
cap
acit
y b
uild
ing,
an
d e
ffec
tive
in
form
atio
n f
low
an
d c
om
mu
nic
atio
n. N
atu
ral
dis
aste
r m
itig
atio
n, p
rep
ared
nes
san
d r
esp
onse
an
d r
elie
f an
d c
limat
e ch
ang
e ef
fect
ivel
y ad
dre
ssed
. Ad
apta
tion
mea
sure
s d
evel
oped
an
d c
apac
ity
bu
ilt t
o d
eal w
ith
emer
gin
g is
sues
an
d c
riti
cal
nee
ds
targ
eted
to
cre
ate
resi
lien
t aq
uac
ult
ure
far
mer
s.
Ou
tpu
t 4
.1 –
Tra
inin
g a
nd
cap
acit
y b
uild
ing
str
eng
then
ed
Imp
rove
su
pp
ort
ing
ser
vice
s to
su
stai
nab
le p
rod
uct
ion
th
rou
gh
imp
rove
d e
du
cati
on
, tra
inin
g a
nd
cap
acit
y b
uild
ing,
tar
get
ed r
esea
rch
an
d d
evel
op
men
t,an
d e
ffec
tive
info
rmat
ion
exc
han
ge
and
co
mm
un
icat
ion
. Aq
ua-
farm
er f
ield
sch
oo
ls a
nd
exc
han
ge
pro
gra
mm
es p
rom
ote
d.
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
4.1
.1 R
evie
w c
urr
ent
trai
nin
g p
ract
ices
and
det
erm
ine
way
s to
pro
vid
e an
dim
pro
ve a
cces
s fo
r sm
all-
scal
e fa
rmer
ssu
ch a
s th
rou
gh
IT
4.1
.2 D
evel
op
tra
inin
g m
ater
ials
an
dtr
ain
ing
co
urs
es e
spec
ially
for
smal
l-sca
le f
arm
ers
rele
van
t to
SIA
Trai
n t
rain
ers
and
mak
e tr
ain
ing
mat
eria
ls w
idel
y av
aila
ble
Imp
rove
d p
rod
uct
ion
met
ho
do
log
y,fa
rm m
anag
emen
t, b
usi
nes
sd
evel
op
men
t an
d fo
od
saf
ety
req
uir
emen
ts fo
r b
ette
r m
arke
t ac
cess
Rep
ort
on
tra
inin
gn
eed
s as
sess
men
t
Trai
nin
g c
ou
rses
imp
lem
ente
d
Use
r fr
ien
dly
tra
inin
gm
ater
ials
dev
elo
ped
Smal
l-sc
ale
farm
ers
wit
him
pro
ved
far
min
gp
ract
ices
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edal
l rel
evan
t; o
nly
3su
gg
este
d n
ot
rele
van
t
1 to
2 y
ears
Nat
ion
alG
over
nm
ent
and
do
no
rsN
atio
nal
aqu
acu
ltu
reag
ency
an
dSE
AFD
EC/A
QD
Trai
nin
g m
od
ule
s in
spec
ific
top
ics
dev
elo
ped
Trai
ner
s’ p
oo
les
tab
lish
ed
Smal
l-sc
ale
farm
ers
rece
ived
tra
inin
g
Alm
ost
all
cou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
ed r
elev
ant;
on
ly1
sug
ges
ted
no
tre
leva
nt
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
al
Do
no
rs w
ith
nat
ion
alco
un
terp
arts
Nat
ion
alfis
her
ies
agen
cy in
par
tner
ship
wit
hvo
cati
on
al a
nd
tech
nic
alin
stit
ute
s
41
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
4.1
.3 Im
pro
ve c
apac
ity
for
scie
nti
fican
d v
oca
tio
nal
tra
inin
g
4.1
.4 S
tren
gth
en t
rain
ing
for
all
stak
eho
lder
s al
on
g t
he
valu
e ch
ain
ing
oo
d a
qu
acu
ltu
re/m
anu
fact
ure
pra
ctic
es (G
Aq
Ps)
4.1
.5 P
rep
are
exte
nsi
on
mat
eria
ls o
nsu
stai
nab
le in
ten
sific
atio
n a
nd
mak
eth
em w
idel
y av
aila
ble
in k
eyla
ng
uag
es
4.1
.6 P
rom
ote
far
mer
exc
han
ge
pro
gra
mm
es t
o e
nco
ura
ge
tran
sfer
of
kno
wle
dg
e an
d e
xper
ien
ce
4.1
.7 U
pg
rad
e n
atio
nal
aq
uac
ult
ure
edu
cati
on
al p
rog
ram
mes
4.1
.8 C
on
du
ct t
arg
eted
tra
inin
g a
nd
bu
ild c
apac
ity
for
cou
ntr
ies
wit
hp
rese
nt
low
aq
uac
ult
ure
pro
du
ctio
n
4.1
.9 E
stab
lish
aq
ua
farm
er f
ield
sch
oo
ls (A
FFS)
focu
sin
g o
n S
IA
Nu
mb
er o
f p
erso
nn
eltr
ain
edM
ost
co
un
trie
s in
dic
ated
rele
van
t; o
nly
3 su
gg
este
d n
ot
rele
van
t
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
alD
on
ors
wit
hn
atio
nal
cou
nte
rpar
ts
Nat
ion
alu
niv
ersi
ties
Trai
nin
g m
ater
ials
dev
elo
ped
Trai
ner
s tr
ain
ed
Stak
eho
lder
s tr
ain
ed
Alm
ost
all
cou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
ed r
elev
ant;
on
ly2
sug
ges
ted
no
t re
leva
nt
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
alD
on
ors
wit
hn
atio
nal
cou
nte
rpar
ts
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
SEA
FDEC
/AQ
D
Exte
nsi
on
mat
eria
ls a
nd
trai
nin
g c
ou
rses
avai
lab
le fo
r ex
ten
sio
no
ffic
ers
Nu
mb
er o
f la
ng
uag
es
Nu
mb
er o
f ex
chan
ges
pro
gra
mm
esim
ple
men
ted
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edal
l rel
evan
t; o
nly
3 su
gg
este
d n
ot
rele
van
t
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
alD
on
ors
wit
hn
atio
nal
cou
nte
rpar
ts
Nat
ion
alex
ten
sio
nse
rvic
e an
dN
AC
A
Alm
ost
all
cou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
ed r
elev
ant;
on
ly2
sug
ges
ted
no
t re
leva
nt
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
alD
on
ors
wit
hn
atio
nal
cou
nte
rpar
ts
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
NA
CA
Cu
rric
ula
an
d f
acili
ties
imp
rove
dM
ost
co
un
trie
s in
dic
ated
rele
van
t; 4
sug
ges
ted
no
t re
leva
nt
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
alD
on
ors
wit
hn
atio
nal
cou
nte
rpar
ts
Nat
ion
alu
niv
ersi
ties
Inst
itu
tio
ns
wit
hst
ren
gth
ened
cap
acit
yfo
r p
lan
nin
g a
nd
man
agem
ent
thro
ug
hta
rget
ed t
rain
ing
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
bu
t 7
sug
ges
ted
no
t re
leva
nt
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alD
on
ors
wit
hn
atio
nal
cou
nte
rpar
ts
SEA
FDEC
/AQ
D
Incr
ease
d n
um
ber
of
smal
l-sc
ale
farm
ers
par
tici
pat
ing
AFF
S
8 co
un
trie
s in
dic
ated
rele
van
t an
d 8
ind
icat
edn
ot
rele
van
t
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
go
vern
men
ts w
ith
do
no
r
NA
CA
42
Ou
tpu
t 4
.2 –
Res
earc
h a
nd
dev
elo
pm
ent
stre
ng
then
ed
Rele
van
t an
d q
ual
ity
scie
nti
fic r
esea
rch
an
d t
ech
no
log
ical
dev
elo
pm
ent
sup
po
rted
, an
d c
oord
inat
ion
an
d c
olla
bo
rati
on
am
on
g r
egio
nal
/nat
ion
al R
&D
en
titi
esen
cou
rag
ed in
are
as s
uch
as
gen
etic
s, n
utr
itio
n, f
ish
hea
lth
etc
. A r
egio
nal
R&
D p
lan
dev
elo
ped
an
d c
oo
per
atio
n a
nd
co
llab
ora
tio
n o
n R
&D
fost
ered
.
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
4.2
.1 D
evel
op
an
d im
ple
men
t g
enet
icse
lect
ion
pro
gra
mm
es fo
r ke
yp
rod
uct
ion
sp
ecie
s to
imp
rove
pro
du
ctio
n p
erfo
rman
ce
4.2
.2 S
up
po
rt r
esea
rch
on
hat
cher
yp
rod
uct
ion
an
d c
ult
ure
sys
tem
s fo
rsp
ecie
s w
ith
hig
h p
ote
nti
al fo
raq
uac
ult
ure
4.2
.3 S
up
po
rt r
esea
rch
on
imp
rovi
ng
feed
form
ula
tio
n, f
eed
qu
alit
y an
dfe
edin
g s
trat
egie
s
4.2
.4 S
up
po
rt c
on
tin
ued
res
earc
h fo
rd
evel
op
ing
su
itab
le a
lter
nat
ive
pro
tein
so
urc
es t
hat
will
red
uce
th
ed
epen
den
ce o
n f
ish
mea
l an
d o
ther
fish
-bas
ed p
rod
uct
s
4.2
.5 S
up
po
rt r
esea
rch
on
th
ed
etec
tio
n a
nd
tre
atm
ent
of
dis
ease
san
d d
evel
op
men
t o
f va
ccin
es a
nd
oth
er a
lter
nat
ive
to v
eter
inar
y d
rug
s
Gen
etic
sel
ecti
on
pro
gra
mm
es d
evel
op
edan
d im
ple
men
ted
Nu
mb
er o
f sp
ecie
s/st
rain
s im
pro
ved
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
on
ly3
sug
ges
ted
no
t re
leva
nt
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
gov
ern
men
t w
ith
do
no
rs
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
Wo
rld
Fish
Nu
mb
er o
f sp
ecie
ssu
cces
sfu
lly d
evel
op
edM
ost
co
un
trie
s in
dic
ated
rele
van
t; o
nly
3 su
gg
este
d n
ot
rele
van
t
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
alN
atio
nal
gov
ern
men
t w
ith
do
no
rs
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
SEA
FDEC
/AQ
D
Nu
mb
er o
f fe
eds
avai
lab
le w
ith
red
uce
dFC
R
Nu
mb
er o
f n
ew fe
eds
dev
elo
ped
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
on
ly2
sug
ges
ted
no
t re
leva
nt
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
alN
atio
nal
go
vern
men
t w
ith
do
no
rs
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
SEA
FDEC
/AQ
D
Nu
mb
er o
f n
ew p
rote
in/
lipid
res
ou
rces
mad
eav
aila
ble
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
4 su
gg
este
dn
ot
rele
van
t
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
alN
atio
nal
go
vern
men
t w
ith
do
no
rs
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
SEA
FDEC
/AQ
D
New
rap
id d
iag
no
stic
met
ho
ds
avai
lab
le
New
vac
cin
es fo
rim
po
rtan
t d
isea
ses
dev
elo
ped
New
eff
ecti
ve a
nd
saf
etr
eatm
ents
ava
ilab
le
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
3 su
gg
este
dn
ot
rele
van
t
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
alN
atio
nal
go
vern
men
t w
ith
do
no
rs
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy, N
AC
Aan
d S
EAFD
EC/
AQ
D
43
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
4.2
.6 Im
pro
ve t
oo
ls a
nd
use
of
too
lsfo
r aq
uac
ult
ure
sec
tor
man
agem
ent
e.g.
car
ryin
g c
apac
ity,
dis
ease
ris
k, e
tc.
for
sust
ain
able
inte
nsi
ficat
ion
of
aqu
acu
ltu
re
4.2
.7 C
on
sult
th
e p
riva
te s
ecto
r o
nR&
D n
eed
s an
d p
oss
ible
join
t fu
nd
ing
of
rese
arch
4.2
.8 D
evel
op
a r
egio
nal
R&
D p
lan
Pro
mo
te c
oo
per
atio
n a
nd
coo
rdin
atio
n a
mo
ng
reg
ion
al a
nd
nat
ion
al a
qu
acu
ltu
re R
/D e
nti
ties
4.2
.9 D
evel
op
tec
hn
olo
gie
s th
atre
du
ce t
he
carb
on
foo
tpri
nt
and
envi
ron
men
tal p
erfo
rman
ce a
s w
ell a
sen
viro
nm
enta
l man
agem
ent
too
ls(e
.g. c
arry
ing
cap
acit
y) t
o c
on
trib
ute
to a
mo
re s
ust
ain
able
ind
ust
ry
4.2
.10
Tar
get
res
earc
h a
nd
tech
no
log
y tr
ansf
er p
rog
ram
mes
fo
rco
un
trie
s w
ith
pre
sen
t lo
waq
uac
ult
ure
pro
du
ctio
n
Aq
uac
ult
ure
man
agem
ent
too
lsad
apte
d fo
r A
sia
Too
ls u
sed
by
aqu
acu
ltu
re p
lan
ner
san
d m
anag
ers
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
4 co
un
trie
ssu
gg
este
d n
ot
rele
van
t
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
alN
atio
nal
go
vern
men
t w
ith
do
no
rs
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
SEA
FDEC
/AQ
D
Rep
ort
s o
n n
eed
sas
sess
men
t st
ud
y
R&D
pro
gra
ms
dev
elo
ped
an
dim
ple
men
ted
bas
ed o
nR&
D n
eed
s as
sess
men
t
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
3 su
gg
este
dn
ot
rele
van
t
1 to
2 y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
al
Nat
ion
alg
ove
rnm
ent
wit
hd
on
ors
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
SEA
FDEC
/AQ
D
Reg
ion
al a
nd
nat
ion
aln
etw
ork
of
rese
arch
an
dd
evel
op
men
t en
titi
eses
tab
lish
ed
Reg
ion
al a
nd
nat
ion
alR&
D p
lan
s d
evel
op
ed
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
3 su
gg
este
dn
ot
rele
van
t
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
alN
atio
nal
go
vern
men
t w
ith
do
no
rs
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
SEA
FDEC
/AQ
D
New
tec
hn
olo
gie
sav
aila
ble
Car
bo
n fo
otp
rin
tre
du
ced
by
un
it a
rea/
pro
du
ctio
n
Rese
arch
an
dte
chn
olo
gy
tran
sfer
pro
gra
mm
es d
evel
op
ed
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
3 su
gg
este
dn
ot
rele
van
t
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
3 su
gg
este
dn
ot
rele
van
t
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
al
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
al
Nat
ion
alg
ove
rnm
ent
wit
hd
on
ors
Nat
ion
alg
ove
rnm
ent
wit
hd
on
ors
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
SEA
FDEC
/AQ
D
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
SEA
FDEC
/AQ
D
44
Ou
tpu
t 4
.3 –
Info
rmat
ion
exc
han
ge
and
co
mm
un
icat
ion
imp
rove
d
Effic
ient
com
mu
nic
atio
n s
trat
egie
s, in
fras
tru
ctu
re a
nd
info
rmat
ion
dat
abas
es d
evel
oped
. In
form
atio
n e
xch
ang
e an
d c
omm
un
icat
ion
act
ivit
ies
that
wou
ld a
llow
for
effe
ctiv
e in
form
atio
n-s
har
ing
to
a w
ide
aud
ien
ce in
key
lan
gu
ages
su
pp
ort
ed.
4.3
.1 D
evel
op
nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
alo
utr
each
str
ateg
ies
that
en
com
pas
s al
las
pec
ts o
f su
stai
nab
le a
qu
acu
ltu
reg
row
th a
nd
tar
get
key
sta
keh
old
ers
and
co
un
trie
s
4.3
.2 D
evel
op
co
mm
un
icat
ion
stra
teg
ies
for
eng
agin
g v
ario
us
pla
yers
incl
ud
ing
po
licy-
mak
ers,
pri
vate
sect
or,
gen
der
ad
voca
cy g
rou
ps
and
civi
l so
ciet
y o
rgan
izat
ion
s
4.3
.3 P
rod
uce
an
d d
istr
ibu
tep
ub
licat
ion
s re
leva
nt
to s
ust
ain
able
inte
nsi
ficat
ion
of
aqu
acu
ltu
re in
key
lan
gu
ages
4.3
.4 P
rom
ote
dis
sem
inat
ion
of
rele
van
t in
form
atio
n t
hro
ug
h IC
Tan
d s
oci
al m
ediaAct
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
Nu
mb
er o
f st
rate
gie
sim
ple
men
ted
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
4 su
gg
este
dn
ot
rele
van
t
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
alD
on
ors
wit
hn
atio
nal
cou
nte
rpar
ts
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy, N
AC
Aan
d S
EAFD
EC/
AQ
D
Nat
ion
al a
qu
acu
ltu
rein
form
atio
n s
yste
mes
tab
lish
ed
Nu
mb
er o
f fa
rmer
s w
ho
hav
e g
oo
d a
cces
s to
key
aqu
acu
ltu
re in
form
atio
n
Nu
mb
er a
nd
cov
erag
eo
f p
ub
licat
ion
s
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
4 su
gg
este
dn
ot
rele
van
t
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
3 su
gg
este
dn
ot
rele
van
t
3 to
5 y
ears
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
al
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
al
Do
no
rs w
ith
nat
ion
alco
un
terp
arts
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy, N
AC
Aan
d S
EAFD
EC/
AQ
D
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy, N
AC
Aan
d S
EAFD
EC/
AQ
D
Nu
mb
er o
fkn
ow
led
gea
ble
far
mer
s
Nu
mb
er o
f d
ow
nlo
ads
of
rele
van
t in
form
atio
nfr
om
Inte
rnet
Co
mm
un
ity
info
rmat
ion
cen
tres
est
ablis
hed
an
dn
um
ber
of
farm
ers
linke
d
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
2 su
gg
este
dn
ot
rele
van
t
5+ y
ears
Do
no
rs w
ith
nat
ion
alco
un
terp
arts
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
alD
on
ors
wit
hn
atio
nal
cou
nte
rpar
ts
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy, N
AC
Aan
d S
EAFD
EC/
AQ
D
45
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
4.3
.5 A
lloca
te r
eso
urc
es fo
rtr
ansl
atio
n o
f in
form
atio
n p
acka
ges
into
loca
l lan
gu
ages
Nu
mb
er o
f in
form
atio
np
rod
uct
s tr
ansl
ated
an
dm
ade
avai
lab
le
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
3 su
gg
este
dn
ot
rele
van
t
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
alD
on
ors
wit
hn
atio
nal
cou
nte
rpar
ts
NA
CA
an
dSE
AFD
EC/A
QD
Ou
tco
me
5. I
ncr
ease
d s
oci
al r
esp
on
sib
ility
an
d e
qu
itab
le b
enef
its
Incr
ease
d s
oci
al r
esp
on
sib
ility
an
d im
pro
ved
eq
uit
y in
par
tici
pat
ion
an
d b
enef
it d
istr
ibu
tio
n, e
mp
has
izin
g w
om
en’s
rig
hts
an
d s
mal
l-sc
ale
farm
ers’
ben
efit
sal
on
g t
he
wh
ole
val
ue
chai
n t
hro
ug
h in
crea
sed
aw
aren
ess
and
sp
ecia
lly fo
cuse
d in
terv
enti
on
s.
Ou
tpu
t 5
.1 –
So
cial
res
po
nsi
bili
ty e
nh
ance
d
Go
od
co
mp
any
and
fam
ily f
arm
so
cial
res
po
nsi
bili
ty p
rom
ote
d a
nd
go
od
em
plo
ymen
t p
ract
ices
an
d h
ealt
h a
nd
saf
ety
pro
ced
ure
s im
ple
men
ted
. Eff
ecti
vem
ech
anis
ms
for
con
flict
s re
solu
tio
n e
stab
lish
ed a
nd
ad
op
ted.
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
5.1
.1 P
rom
ote
go
od
an
d a
pp
rop
riat
eem
plo
ymen
t p
ract
ices
in a
cco
rdan
cew
ith
nat
ion
al la
ws
and
reg
ula
tio
n, i
fav
aila
ble
Rep
ort
on
ass
essm
ent
on
pre
sen
t em
plo
ymen
tp
ract
ices
for
aqu
acu
ltu
re
Gu
idel
ines
on
go
od
an
dle
gal
em
plo
ymen
tp
ract
ices
incl
ud
ing
mea
sure
s to
pro
tect
mig
rati
ng
lab
ore
rs
Co
nsu
ltat
ion
s w
ith
par
tici
pat
ing
co
un
trie
so
n g
uid
elin
es
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
bu
t 5
sug
ges
ted
no
t re
leva
nt
1 to
2 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
an
dex
tern
alRe
leva
nt
nat
ion
alau
tho
riti
esRe
gio
nal
org
aniz
atio
n,
FAO
, ILO
1 to
2 y
ears
1 to
2 y
ears
46
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
5.1
.2 F
arm
ers
mad
e aw
are
of
and
com
ply
wit
h n
atio
nal
lab
ou
r la
ws
and
pro
vid
e w
ork
ers
wit
h a
deq
uat
e w
ork
and
on
-sit
e liv
ing
co
nd
itio
ns
to a
ssu
reth
eir
hea
lth
an
d t
he
safe
ty o
f liv
esan
d p
rop
erty
etc
. an
d o
ffer
th
emtr
ain
ing
an
d s
kills
dev
elo
pm
ent
rela
ted
to
saf
ety
and
hea
lth
in w
ork
5.1
.3 D
evel
op
an
d a
do
pt
mec
han
ism
sfo
r co
nfli
cts
reso
luti
on
to
en
sure
loca
lso
cial
acc
epta
nce
.Do
cum
ent
and
shar
e ex
isti
ng
go
od
pra
ctic
es fo
rco
nfli
ct r
eso
luti
on
Ass
essm
ent
rep
ort
s o
np
rese
nt
emp
loye
eh
ealt
h a
nd
saf
ety
incl
ud
ing
iden
tific
atio
no
f ke
y ri
sks
for
aqu
acu
ltu
re
Gu
idel
ines
on
go
od
an
dle
gal
pra
ctic
es
Trai
nin
g c
ou
rses
incl
ud
ing
on
fir
st a
id
Ava
ilab
ility
of
rela
ted
too
ls/e
qu
ipm
ent
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
bu
t 6
sug
ges
ted
no
t re
leva
nt
1 to
2 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
an
dex
tern
alC
om
pet
ent
nat
ion
alau
tho
riti
es
Reg
ion
alo
rgan
izat
ion
s,FA
O, I
LO
Rep
ort
s (p
oss
ibly
web
-bas
ed r
epo
rtin
g o
fg
oo
d c
ase
stu
die
s)
Dra
ft r
egio
nal
gu
idel
ines
Syst
em fo
r p
erio
dic
mo
nit
ori
ng
an
dev
alu
atio
n in
pla
ce
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
bu
t 7
sug
ges
ted
no
t re
leva
nt
1 to
2 y
ears
+5
year
s
1 to
2 y
ears
1 to
2 y
ears
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
an
dso
me
exte
rnal
Co
mp
eten
tn
atio
nal
auth
ori
ties
Reg
ion
alo
rgan
izat
ion
,FA
O
47
Ou
tpu
t 5
.2 –
Eq
uit
able
acc
ess
to o
pp
ort
un
itie
s an
d b
enef
its
pro
mo
ted
Equ
itab
le o
pp
ort
un
itie
s fo
r b
enef
its
and
rig
hts
alo
ng
th
e va
lue
chai
n, e
spec
ially
for
wo
men
, po
or
and
mar
gin
aliz
ed g
rou
ps
pro
mo
ted
.
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
5.2
.1 Im
pro
ve t
he
valu
e ch
ain
to
bet
ter
resp
on
d t
o e
xter
nal
itie
s su
ch a
sg
lob
aliz
atio
n, p
rice
flu
ctu
atio
ns,
clim
ate
chan
ge/
vari
abili
ty a
nd
oth
ern
atu
ral h
azar
ds
5.2
.2 P
rom
ote
fai
r an
d im
pro
ved
acce
ss o
f d
iffer
ent
gro
up
s to
reso
urc
es (l
and,
wat
er, e
ner
gy,
cre
dit
,in
form
atio
n a
nd
tra
inin
g e
tc.)
inaq
uac
ult
ure
bu
sin
ess
5.2
.3 Im
pro
ve t
he
dis
trib
uti
on
of
ben
efit
s al
on
g t
he
valu
e ch
ain
an
did
enti
fy e
ntr
y p
oin
ts t
o e
nh
ance
ben
efit
s al
on
g t
he
valu
e ch
ain
An
alys
is r
epo
rts
on
th
eim
pac
t o
f glo
bal
izat
ion
,fo
od
pri
ce f
luct
uat
ion
san
d c
limat
e ch
ang
e o
nsm
all-
scal
e o
per
ato
rs
Mea
sure
s to
en
han
celiv
elih
oo
ds
of
diff
eren
tg
rou
ps
iden
tifie
d a
nd
imp
lem
ente
d
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
bu
t 6
sug
ges
ted
no
t re
leva
nt
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
plu
sex
tern
al f
un
der
sC
om
pet
ent
nat
ion
alau
tho
riti
esan
d r
elev
ant
inst
itu
tio
ns
AD
B, W
B e
tc.
An
alys
is r
epo
rt o
n t
he
stat
us
of
acce
ss t
ore
sou
rces
Mea
sure
s to
en
sure
fai
rac
cess
iden
tifie
d
8 co
un
trie
s in
dic
ated
yes
rele
van
t an
d8
sug
ges
ted
no
t re
leva
nt
1 to
2 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
plu
sex
tern
al f
un
der
sC
om
pet
ent
nat
ion
alau
tho
riti
esan
d r
elev
ant
inst
itu
tio
ns
Reg
ion
alo
rgan
izat
ion
s
An
alys
is o
f th
ed
istr
ibu
tio
n o
f p
rofit
sal
on
g t
he
valu
e ch
ain
and
iden
tify
en
try
po
ints
alo
ng
th
e va
lue
chai
nth
at e
nh
ance
pro
fits
Reg
ion
al w
ork
sho
pco
nd
uct
ed
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
bu
t6
sug
ges
ted
no
t re
leva
nt
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
plu
sex
tern
al f
un
der
sC
om
pet
ent
auth
ori
ties
,p
riva
te s
ecto
ran
d r
elev
ant
inst
itu
tio
ns
Reg
ion
alo
rgan
izat
ion
s
48
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
Pilo
t p
roje
cts
on
sele
cted
co
mm
od
ity
valu
e ch
ain
sim
ple
men
ted
Pilo
t p
roje
cts
eval
uat
ed
Ou
tpu
t 5
.3 –
Gen
der
inte
gra
tio
n p
rom
ote
d a
nd
pra
ctic
ed
Gen
der
eq
ual
ity
pro
mo
ted
an
d m
ain
stre
amed
as
an in
teg
ral p
art
of
reg
ion
al a
qu
acu
ltu
re d
evel
op
men
t p
olic
ies
and
pro
gra
mm
es in
lin
e w
ith
th
e g
lob
ally
acce
pte
d d
imen
sio
ns
of
gen
der
eq
ual
ity
and
wo
men
’s em
po
wer
men
t.
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
5.3
.1 A
sses
s th
e p
rese
nt
gen
der
po
licie
s an
d p
rog
ram
mer
s fo
raq
uac
ult
ure
Gap
s an
d w
eakn
esse
s id
enti
fied
5.3
.2 S
tren
gth
en g
end
erm
ain
stre
amin
g p
olic
ies
and
pro
gra
mm
es t
hro
ug
hre
com
men
dat
ion
s, ad
voca
cy,
cam
pai
gn
s, lo
bb
yin
g a
nd
wo
rkin
gw
ith
nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
al w
om
en/
gen
der
gro
up
s/n
etw
ork
s
Aq
uac
ult
ure
po
licy
do
cum
ents
an
din
terv
enti
on
sin
corp
ora
tin
g r
elev
ant
gen
der
eq
ual
ity
dim
ensi
on
s
9 co
un
trie
s in
dic
ated
rele
van
t an
d7
sug
ges
ted
no
tre
leva
nt
2 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
go
vern
men
tsw
ith
so
me
do
no
rfu
nd
s
NA
CA
wit
hW
orl
dFi
sh
Reg
ion
al p
olic
yd
ialo
gu
es a
nd
org
aniz
atio
ns
wit
hb
alan
ced
gen
der
par
tici
pat
ion
Incr
ease
d n
um
ber
of
wo
men
in d
ecis
ion
-m
akin
g b
od
ies
incl
ud
ing
NA
CA
Gov
ern
ing
Co
un
cil,
SEA
FDEC
, FA
O, W
orl
dFi
shet
c.
7 co
un
trie
s in
dic
ated
rele
van
t an
d9
sug
ges
ted
no
tre
leva
nt
2 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
go
vern
men
tsw
ith
so
me
do
no
rfu
nd
s
FAO
, NA
CA
,SE
AFD
EC,
Wo
rld
Fish
etc
.
49
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
5.3
.3 A
nal
yze
cau
ses
of
dis
crim
inat
ion
that
mar
gin
aliz
es w
om
en’s
invo
lvem
ent
in a
qu
acu
ltu
re, a
nd
iden
tify
mea
sure
s to
red
uce
th
is s
uch
as t
hro
ug
h e
du
cati
on
al a
war
enes
sca
mp
aig
ns
5.3
.4 D
evel
op
tra
inin
g c
ou
rses
targ
eted
at
wo
men
for
farm
man
agem
ent,
bo
ok
keep
ing,
acco
un
tin
g, fo
od
saf
ety,
mar
keti
ng
etc
.
Red
uce
d f
acto
rs o
fd
iscr
imin
atio
n in
clu
din
gcu
ltu
ral t
abo
os
cau
sin
gm
arg
inal
izat
ion
of
wo
men
Incr
ease
d p
arti
cip
atio
n/
voic
e o
f w
om
en in
dec
isio
n-m
akin
g in
aqu
acu
ltu
re o
per
atio
ns
and
man
agem
ent
Incr
ease
d n
um
ber
of
wo
men
en
trep
ren
eurs
alo
ng
th
e aq
uac
ult
ure
valu
e ch
ain
Wo
men
wit
h a
uth
ori
tyto
sig
n d
ocu
men
ts s
uch
as fo
r fin
anci
al a
nd
pro
per
ty t
ran
sact
ion
s
9 co
un
trie
s in
dic
ated
rele
van
t an
d7
sug
ges
ted
no
tre
leva
nt
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
go
vern
men
ts w
ith
som
e d
on
or
fun
ds
Nat
ion
al s
oci
alm
inis
trie
s w
ith
fish
erie
s
Incr
ease
d c
apac
ity
bu
ildin
g a
ctiv
itie
sin
clu
din
g t
rain
ing
cou
rses
for
wo
men
(at
leas
t 50
% w
om
enp
arti
cip
ants
)
Incr
ease
d n
um
ber
of
wo
men
as
man
ager
san
d C
EOs
All
cou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt
2 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alD
on
or
wit
hn
atio
nal
cou
nte
rpar
t
NA
CA
50
Ou
tco
me
6. I
ncr
ease
d r
esili
ence
of
farm
ers
Resi
lien
ce o
f fa
rmer
s an
d o
ther
sta
keh
old
ers
in t
he
pro
cess
of
inte
nsi
ficat
ion
is s
ign
ifica
ntl
y in
crea
sed
th
rou
gh
incr
ease
d p
rep
ared
nes
s o
f fa
rmer
s an
d o
ther
stak
eho
lder
s in
han
dlin
g n
atu
ral
dis
aste
rs a
nd
so
cio
-eco
no
mic
ris
ks, e
ffec
tive
mec
han
ism
s fo
r p
ub
lic w
arn
ing,
res
po
nse
an
d r
elie
f to
em
erg
enci
es a
nd
stre
ng
then
ed c
apac
ity
for
man
agin
g n
atu
ral d
isas
ter
risk
s an
d m
itig
atin
g t
he
imp
acts
of
clim
ate
chan
ge.
Ou
tpu
t 6
.1 –
Clim
ate
chan
ge
and
nat
ura
l dis
aste
rs e
ffec
tive
ly a
dd
ress
ed
Iden
tify
an
d f
acili
tate
co
st-e
ffec
tive
ad
apta
tio
n t
o c
limat
e ch
ang
e an
d t
he
imp
act
mit
igat
ion
mea
sure
s an
d e
ffec
tive
mec
han
ism
s to
res
po
nd
to
nat
ura
ld
isas
ters
th
rou
gh
co
nce
rted
nat
ion
al e
ffo
rts
and
inte
nsi
fied
reg
ion
al a
nd
inte
r-re
gio
nal
co
-op
erat
ion
.
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
6.1
.1 D
evel
op
an
d im
ple
men
t cl
imat
ech
ang
e ad
apta
tio
n a
nd
mit
igat
ion
mea
sure
s
Revi
ew r
epo
rts
on
bio
phy
sica
l an
d s
oci
o-
eco
no
mic
imp
acts
of
pas
t cl
imat
e ch
ang
eev
ents
on
aq
uac
ult
ure
Key
po
ten
tial
clim
ate
chan
ge
imp
acts
affe
ctin
g d
iffer
ent
aqu
acu
ltu
re s
yste
ms
iden
tifie
d a
nd
pri
ori
tize
d
Ris
k m
app
ing
un
der
take
n a
nd
mo
stvu
lner
able
aq
uac
ult
ure
area
s an
d s
yste
ms
iden
tifie
d
Clim
ate
smar
tad
apta
tio
n a
nd
mit
igat
ion
mea
sure
sd
evel
op
ed
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
bu
t5
sug
ges
ted
no
tre
leva
nt.
No
te c
on
sid
erab
leco
un
try
vari
atio
nd
epen
din
g o
n t
he
issu
e(s
ee b
elo
w)
2 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
go
vern
men
t an
dex
tern
al s
ou
rces
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
clim
ate
chan
ge
agen
cy
As
abov
e; s
om
e g
ave
a p
osi
tive
res
po
nse
on
rele
van
ce b
ut
no
tp
lan
nin
g r
isk
map
pin
ge.
g. N
epal
2 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
al
As
abov
e e.
g. S
ri L
anka
pla
nn
ing
in a
ll d
istr
icts
;o
ther
s m
ore
sel
ecti
ve
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
al
Nat
ion
alg
ove
rnm
ent
and
exte
rnal
so
urc
es
Nat
ion
alg
ove
rnm
ent
and
exte
rnal
so
urc
es
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
clim
ate
chan
ge
agen
cy
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
NA
CA
51
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
6.1
.2 In
teg
rate
clim
ate
chan
ge
adap
tati
on
an
d m
itig
atio
n m
easu
res
into
th
e ec
on
om
ic a
nd
so
cial
dev
elo
pm
ent
po
licy
fram
ewo
rk
6.1
.3 In
teg
rate
clim
ate
chan
ge
adap
tati
on
an
d m
itig
atio
n m
easu
res
on
aq
uac
ult
ure
into
ove
rall
dis
aste
rri
sk m
anag
emen
t (D
RM)
Gap
an
alys
is u
nd
erta
ken
to a
sses
s n
atio
nal
cap
acit
y in
dea
ling
wit
hcl
imat
e ch
ang
e im
pac
ts
Nat
ion
al in
stit
uti
on
sw
ith
dev
elo
ped
cap
acit
yto
res
po
nd
to
clim
ate
chan
ge
imp
acts
Scie
nce
an
d t
ech
no
log
ym
easu
res
iden
tifie
d fo
rad
apta
tio
n a
nd
mit
igat
ion
Rese
arch
an
dd
evel
op
men
t p
lan
sd
evel
op
ed t
o a
dd
ress
the
nee
ds
Key
mea
sure
s o
naq
uac
ult
ure
ad
apta
tio
nan
d m
itig
atio
nin
teg
rate
d in
to n
atio
nal
clim
ate
chan
ge
po
licy
and
act
ion
pla
ns
As
abov
e2
to 5
yea
rsN
atio
nal
an
dre
gio
nal
Nat
ion
alg
ove
rnm
ent
and
exte
rnal
so
urc
es
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
un
iver
siti
es
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
bu
t 4
cou
ntr
ies
sug
ges
ted
no
t re
leva
nt
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
go
vern
men
t an
dex
tern
al s
ou
rces
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
clim
ate
chan
ge
agen
cy
Nat
ura
l cal
amit
yin
sura
nce
ext
end
ed t
oaq
uac
ult
ure
an
d m
ake
avai
lab
le fo
r ke
y cl
imat
ech
ang
e r
isks
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
bu
t 5
cou
ntr
ies
sug
ges
ted
no
t re
leva
nt
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
go
vern
men
t an
dex
tern
al s
ou
rces
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
dev
elo
pm
ent
ban
k
52
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
6.1
.4 In
crea
se t
he
pre
par
edn
ess
of
farm
ers
to r
esp
on
d t
o d
iffer
ent
risk
san
d d
isas
ters
6.1
.5 F
ost
er r
egio
nal
an
d n
atio
nal
coo
per
atio
n fo
r cl
imat
e ch
ang
ead
apta
tio
n a
nd
dis
aste
r im
pac
tm
itig
atio
n, p
rep
ared
nes
s, re
spo
nse
,an
d r
ecov
ery
Ass
essm
ent
rep
ort
on
DRM
cap
acit
y
Cap
acit
y st
ren
gth
ened
in a
qu
acu
ltu
re a
reas
that
are
vu
lner
able
to
clim
ate
chan
ge
vari
abili
ty
A d
ecis
ion
su
pp
ort
syst
em d
evel
op
ed fo
rim
ple
men
tin
g c
limat
ech
ang
e a
dap
tati
on
an
dD
RM
Gov
ern
men
t ag
enci
esan
d in
stit
uti
on
sco
llab
ora
tin
g in
th
ein
teg
rati
on
of
CC
adap
tati
on
an
d D
RM in
the
cou
ntr
y an
d in
th
ere
gio
n
Farm
ris
k m
anag
emen
tp
rog
ram
mes
dev
elo
ped
Farm
ers
trai
ned
Net
wo
rks
esta
blis
hed
Reg
ion
al a
pp
roac
hd
evel
op
ed fo
raq
uac
ult
ure
to
mit
igat
ean
d a
dap
t to
clim
ate
chan
ge
imp
acts
Mo
st in
dic
ated
rel
evan
t2
to 5
yea
rsN
atio
nal
No
res
po
nse
rece
ived
fro
m t
he
go
vern
men
ts
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
DRM
ag
ency
Mo
st in
dic
ated
rel
evan
t
Mo
st in
dic
ated
rel
evan
t
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
bu
t 4
cou
ntr
ies
sug
ges
ted
no
t re
leva
nt
2 to
5 y
ears
5+ y
ears
Nat
ion
al
Nat
ion
al
Nat
ion
alN
atio
nal
go
vern
men
t an
dex
tern
al s
ou
rces
Un
iver
siti
es
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy, c
limat
ech
ang
e an
dD
RM a
gen
cies
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy
No
res
po
nse
rece
ived
fro
m t
he
go
vern
men
ts
No
res
po
nse
rece
ived
fro
m t
he
go
vern
men
ts
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
4 co
un
trie
ssu
gg
este
d n
ot
rele
van
t
2 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
alN
atio
nal
go
vern
men
t an
dex
tern
al s
ou
rces
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy, c
limat
ech
ang
e ag
ency
and
NA
CA
53
Ou
tpu
t 6
.2 –
Oth
er e
mer
gin
g is
sues
ad
dre
ssed
Cap
acit
y an
d m
ech
anis
m o
f n
atio
nal
go
vern
men
ts a
nd
reg
ion
al o
rgan
izat
ion
s in
crea
sed
fo
r ef
fect
ivel
y as
sess
ing,
man
agin
g a
nd
res
po
nd
ing
to
var
iou
sem
erg
ing
nat
ura
l, b
iolo
gic
al a
nd
so
cio
-eco
no
mic
ris
ks a
nd
co
mp
lex
glo
bal
an
d r
egio
nal
inte
ract
ion
s.
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
6.2
.1 A
sses
s p
rese
nt
reg
ion
al a
nd
nat
ion
al p
olic
ies
and
str
ateg
ies
for
dea
ling
wit
h c
riti
cal e
mer
gin
g is
sues
affe
ctin
g a
qu
acu
ltu
re (e
con
om
icin
clu
din
g c
han
gin
g m
arke
ts, n
ewd
isea
ses,
tran
sbo
un
dar
y d
isea
ses,
po
litic
al c
risi
s, fo
od
sh
ort
age,
man
-mad
e d
isas
ters
, etc
.)
6.2
.2 D
evel
op
a m
ech
anis
m t
hat
reg
ula
rly
asse
sses
po
ten
tial
em
erg
ing
risk
s an
d r
epo
rts
to t
he
rele
van
tag
enci
es
6.2
.3 U
nd
erta
ke r
egu
lar
iden
tific
atio
no
f em
erg
ing
issu
es a
nd
ass
essm
ent
of
risk
s at
reg
ion
al a
nd
nat
ion
al le
vels
6.2
.4 D
evel
op
co
ord
inat
ion
mec
han
ism
to
mo
nit
or
and
ad
dre
ssem
erg
ing
issu
es a
t b
oth
reg
ion
al a
nd
nat
ion
al le
vels
wit
h a
tim
ely
resp
on
se
Ass
essm
ent
rep
ort
pu
blis
hed
an
dd
isse
min
ated
to
rel
evan
tau
tho
riti
es
Prep
ared
nes
s an
dca
pac
ity
of
cou
ntr
yg
over
nm
ents
to
dea
lw
ith
sh
ock
s
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
bu
t 3
sug
ges
ted
no
t re
leva
nt
1 to
2 y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
alN
atio
nal
gov
ern
men
t an
dex
tern
al
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy a
nd
NA
CA
Co
ord
inat
ing
un
it o
rce
ntr
e b
ased
at
anex
isti
ng
gov
ern
men
to
ffic
e es
tab
lish
ed (t
om
on
ito
r, in
form
an
dm
ob
ilize
d o
ther
un
its)
for
reg
ion
al a
nd
nat
ion
alco
ord
inat
ion
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
on
ly2
sug
ges
ted
no
tre
leva
nt
1 to
2 y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
alN
atio
nal
gov
ern
men
t an
dex
tern
al
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy,
Wo
rld
Fish
an
dN
AC
A
Emer
gin
g is
sues
pri
ori
tize
d a
nd
co
stef
fect
ive
man
agem
ent
mea
sure
s d
evel
op
ed
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
bu
t 5
sug
ges
ted
no
t re
leva
nt
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
alN
atio
nal
gov
ern
men
t an
dex
tern
al
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy,
Wo
rld
Fish
an
dN
AC
A
Reg
ion
al e
mer
gen
cyre
spo
nse
co
ord
inat
ion
cen
tre
esta
blis
hed
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
bu
t 6
sug
ges
ted
no
t re
leva
nt
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
al
Nat
ion
alg
ove
rnm
ent
and
exte
rnal
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy,
Wo
rld
Fish
an
dN
AC
A
54
Act
ivit
ies
Ind
icat
ors
Rel
evan
ce t
o t
he
Tim
efra
me
Leve
l of
Like
ly s
ou
rce
of
Lead
ersh
ipco
un
try
imp
lem
enta
tio
nfu
nd
ing
6.2
.5 D
evel
op
an
d im
ple
men
ta
mec
han
ism
to
del
egat
ere
spo
nsi
bili
ty t
o in
stit
uti
on
s to
fin
dso
luti
on
s to
hig
h r
isk
issu
es
6.2
.6 Id
enti
fy f
un
din
g fo
r re
sear
ch fo
rad
dre
ssin
g e
mer
gin
g is
sues
Emer
gen
cy r
esp
on
sem
ech
anis
m w
ith
del
egat
ed in
stit
uti
on
s to
resp
on
d t
o s
pec
ific
new
emer
gin
g is
sues
, fo
rex
amp
le d
isea
se
Mo
st c
ou
ntr
ies
ind
icat
edre
leva
nt;
bu
t 4
sug
ges
ted
no
t re
leva
nt
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
alN
atio
nal
go
vern
men
t an
dex
tern
al
Nat
ion
alaq
uac
ult
ure
agen
cy,
Wo
rld
Fish
an
dN
AC
A
Pro
po
sals
dev
elo
ped
and
su
bm
itte
d t
op
ote
nti
al d
on
ors
for
fun
din
g
Incr
ease
d a
lloca
tio
n fo
rre
sear
ch w
ith
in t
he
nat
ion
al b
ud
get
s to
sup
po
rt S
IA r
esea
rch
on
rele
van
t em
erg
ing
issu
es
Mec
han
ism
s fo
rco
op
erat
ion
am
on
gco
un
trie
s in
Asi
a-Pa
cific
reg
ion
in p
lace
Incr
ease
d in
vest
men
t in
rese
arch
co
llab
ora
tio
no
n e
mer
gin
g is
sues
of
com
mo
n in
tere
sts
in t
he
reg
ion
Maj
ori
ty o
f co
un
trie
sin
dic
ated
rel
evan
t; o
nly
2 su
gg
este
d n
ot
rele
van
t
3 to
5 y
ears
Nat
ion
al a
nd
reg
ion
alN
atio
nal
gov
ern
men
tsin
tern
atio
nal
do
no
rs, p
riva
tese
cto
r
Nat
ion
alg
over
nm
ents
,N
AC
A,
Wo
rld
Fish
55
Annex 1. Regional Consultation on Strategy and Action Plan for SustainableIntensification of Aquaculture in the Asia-Pacific region
Royal Orchid Sheraton Hotel, Bangkok, Thailand
27-28 November 2014
Background
Intensification of aquaculture has been an ongoing process in the region with the aim being toincrease the productivity and economic efficiency of aquaculture production through intensified useof inputs (materials, energy and investment) and resources (water, feed ingredients), and theapplication of new technologies and improved management practices.
Intensification of aquaculture has been a major contributor to the rapid aquaculture productiongrowth in the Asia-Pacific region in the past two decades (nearly 10 percent annually), and this hassignificantly contributed to food and nutrition security and livelihoods in the region. The region hasconstantly contributed over 90 percent of the world’s aquaculture production for decades.Aquaculture currently supplies 50 percent of the world’s food fish and in Asia aquaculture suppliesover 60 percent of the region’s food fish, comprising over 20 percent of total protein intake by theAsian population. However, the adverse impacts of intensification have attracted considerable publicconcern, especially regarding the long-term sustainability of the sector.
Being the most populous region of the world with heavy demands on natural resources, Asianaquaculture will face great challenges to maintain its growth, and to meet the increasing demandfor fish inside and outside the region over the coming decades. It is estimated that fish consumptionin Asia and the Pacific will increase by 30 percent by 2030. This implies that aquaculture productionwill need to increase by 50 percent by 2030. At the same time, the aquaculture sector is facingserious challenges, such as the impact of climate change and variability, urbanization and relatedsocial and economic changes, increasing intra-regional trade and increasing public concern over theenvironment and food safety.
Working with limited natural resources and various challenges, the only way to meet the increasingdemand for fish is to promote the sustainable intensification of aquaculture (SIA), which means“to produce more with less”, or in other words to increase the productivity and efficiency inaquaculture production with reduced consumption of resources and negative environmental andsocial impacts through improved governance, management practices and adoption of innovativetechnologies.
The need for sustainable intensification in aquaculture production together with the application ofan ecosystem approach to aquaculture has been a subject of several international fora and amongthe priority recommendations of FAO and regional bodies such as the Network of AquacultureCentres in Asia-Pacific (NACA), the Asia-Pacific Fishery Commission (APFIC), and the PhuketConsensus emanating from the Global Conference on Aquaculture in 2010. The Ministerial Meetingon Aquaculture for Food Security, Nutrition and Economic Development in July 2011 in Sri Lankafurther identified four basic tenets of a sustainable aquaculture strategy: (i) responsible access to anduse of aquatic genetic resources and genetic improvement; (ii) sustainable aqua-farming systems;(iii) aquatic animal health including responsible transboundary movement of aquatic animals; and(iv) adaptive responses to climate change impacts. In order to promote SIA, FAO supported a jointAPFIC/NACA regional consultation on Sustainable Intensification of Aquaculture Production in
56
Asia-Pacific (held in Bangkok, Thailand in October 2012). The consultation provided a good platformfor the wide exchange and sharing of scientific knowledge and practical experiences related to SIAand identified the needs for scientific research and technology development to support SIA. FAO hasdone much to promote SIA, and the Thirty-second FAO Asia and the Pacific Regional Conference(APRC) convened in 2014 included a working paper on “Meeting farmers’ aspirations in the contextof green development” that highlighted “sustainable production intensification” and an informationpaper on “Sustainable intensification of aquaculture for food and nutritional security in theAsia-Pacific region.”
As the follow-up to earlier FAO initiatives promoting SIA, the Fifth Regional Consultative ForumMeeting (RCFM) of APFIC (held in Hyderabad, India from 19 to 21 June 2014) included an individualaquaculture session on “Promoting sustainable intensification of aquaculture for food and nutritionalsecurity in the Asia-Pacific region.” The RCFM acknowledged that a transition to sustainableproduction intensification in aquaculture should focus on supporting the prosperity of farming andrural communities and address key sustainability issues related to the management of land andwater resources. The RCFM put forward a complete set of recommendations on priority actions infive major areas related to sustainable intensification of aquaculture in the region, which waspresented to and endorsed by the Thirty-third Session of APFIC.
In order to provide more substantial support to member countries in promoting sustainableintensification of aquaculture, the SIA has now been included as the Asia regional initiative of FAO’sglobal blue growth initiative (BGI).
Although FAO and other regional and international organizations have launched various initiativesto raise awareness and identify priority actions related to SIA and efforts have been made byinternational/regional organizations, country governments, civil society organizations and the privatesector to achieve sustainable intensification of aquaculture on the ground, there is a lack of a wellarticulated regional strategy and a comprehensive action plan to guide and support theconcerted efforts of different stakeholders. Therefore, the Thirty-third Session of the Asia-PacificFishery Commission recommended further regional consultation to prioritize necessary actionsat regional and national levels and to develop a strategic action plan for supportingsustainable intensification of aquaculture in the region.
Purpose
The purpose of the regional consultation is to finalize the regional strategy for the sustainableintensification of aquaculture and develop a practical and implementable regional action plan. Thisregional strategy and the action plan should set a clear vision, goals and strategies towards 2030,as well as a detailed action plan, including short-term (1 to 2 years) and medium-term (towards 2030)action, for sustainable intensification of aquaculture in the Asia-Pacific region. It is expected that theimplementation of this strategy and action plan will be financed, at least partially, by donors andinternational organizations. The consultation will also assist in promoting coordinated and concertedefforts of member governments, regional and international organizations, donor and developmentagencies and the industrial sector in support of the sustainable intensification of aquaculture in theregion.
Organizers
This regional multi-stakeholder consultation is funded and organized by FAO in collaboration withthe Network of Aquaculture Centres in Asia-Pacific, the Asia-Pacific Fishery Commission and theDepartment of Fisheries (DoF) of the Royal Thai Government. The participants compriserepresentatives from member countries, major regional and international organizations, civil society
57
organizations and the private sector, as well as representatives from the industrial sectors andsome donor and development agencies. This two-day consultation is held in Bangkok from 27 to28 November 2014.
Preparatory activities
A regional Technical Cooperation Programme Facility (TCPF) project has been initiated to reviewrecent regional and international policy and strategy related to sustainable development andintensification of aquaculture as well numerous documents prioritizing the sustainable intensificationof aquaculture. This review will lead to the preparation of a draft document entitled RegionalStrategy for Sustainable Intensification of Aquaculture in Asia-Pacific, which will be presentedto the regional multi-stakeholder consultation planned for 27 and 28 November 2014. This strategydocument is expected to enhance the awareness of country governments, regional and internationalorganizations, industrial sectors and donor and development agencies with respect to thesustainable intensification of aquaculture in Asia and the Pacific and their commitment to it.
Expected outputs
The consultation is expected to produce the following outputs:
1. A Regional Strategy for Sustainable Intensification of Aquaculture discussed, elaborated andfinalized on the basis of comments and inputs provided by the participants.
2. An Action Plan for the Sustainable Intensification of Aquaculture including short-term(initial 1 to 2 years) and medium-term (2015–2030) actions discussed and agreed on (withresponsible institutions and initial estimates of resource requirements indicated).
3. A regional level coordination mechanism discussed and agreed on.4. A meeting report produced containing conclusions, recommendations and outputs 1
and 2 (above) in annexes.
58
Programme of Regional Consultation on Strategy and Action Plan forSustainable Intensification of Aquaculture in the Asia-Pacific region
Royal Orchid Sheraton Hotel, Bangkok, Thailand
27-28 November 2014
26 November 2014
Arrival of participants
27 November 2014
08.00–09.00 Registration and assembly
09.00–09.30 Opening Session: Welcome/opening remarks by:
● Director General, NACA
● Representative of Director General, Department of Fisheries, Thailand
● Deputy Regional Representative on behalf of Assistant Director General,FAO-RAP
09.30–09.45 Introduction to the consultation (FAO)
09.45–10.15 Group photo and coffee break
10.15–10.45 Presentation of Review of policy and strategy recommendations related tosustainable development and intensification of aquaculture from recentregional and global events (Consultant)
10.45–11.15 Plenary discussion on the review
11.15–11.30 Presentation by WorldFish on its ongoing work supporting sustainable growthof aquaculture
11.30–12.00 Draft regional strategy for sustainable intensification of aquaculture inAsia-Pacific (presented by consultant)
12.00-12.30 Plenary discussion on the draft regional strategy (focus on framework and keyelements)
12.30–13.30 Lunch break
13.30–13.45 Introduction to working group session on the regional strategy
13.45–15.45 Working group session on the draft regional strategy (suggested revisionsdirectly on the document)
(3 groups and each to cover two strategic objectives)
15.45–16.00 Coffee break
16.00–17.30 Presentation of working group discussion outputs (only the suggested revisions)
Plenary discussion (follow each presentation)
18.00 Reception dinner
59
28 November 2014
08.30–09.30 Presentation on draft regional action plan supporting sustainable intensificationof aquaculture in Asia-Pacific
Plenary discussion on the draft regional action plan (general comments)
09.30-09.40 Introduction to working group session on the regional action plan
09.40–10.00 Coffee break
10.00–11.45 Working group session I on the regional action plan
(3 or 4 groups based on the structure of the action plan)
11.45–12.30 Presentation of working group discussion outputs
Plenary discussion (follow each presentation)
12.30–13.30 Lunch break
13.30–15.30 Working group session II on the regional action plan
(3 or 4 groups based on the structure of the document)
15.30 –16.00 Coffee break
16.00-17.00 Presentation of working group session II outputs
Plenary discussion (follow each presentation)
17.00–17.30 Discussion on how to promote concerted efforts and coordination
Closing session
60
Annex 2. Participants list: Regional Consultation on Strategy and Action Planfor the Sustainable Intensification of Aquaculture in the Asia-Pacific region
Royal Orchid Sheraton Hotel, Bangkok, Thailand
27-28 November 2014
Bangladesh
M I Golder Tel: +880 2 957 1812Director Fax: + 880 2 956 8393Department of Fisheries E-mail: [email protected], Ramna, DhakaBangladesh
Bhutan
Namgay Dorji Tel: +975 6 251 190Program Director Mobile: +975 171 503 64National Centre for Aquaculture Fax: +975-6-251 201Department of Livestock E-mail: [email protected] of Agriculture and ForestsBhutan
Brunei Darussalam
Hajah Rosinah Haji Mohd Yusof (Mrs) Tel: +673 277 0700Senior Fishery Officer E-mail: [email protected] of Fisheries, Ministry of Industry andPrimary ResourcesMuara Fisheries Complex, Simpang 287-53Jalan Peranginan Pantai Serasa Muara, BTI 728Brunei Darussalam
Noraini Haji Anggas (Mrs) Tel: +673 277 0066Acting Senior Fisheries Officer E-mail: [email protected] of Fisheries, Ministry of Industry andPrimary ResourcesMuara Fisheries Complex, Simpang 287-53Jalan Peranginan Pantai Serasa Muara, BTI 728Brunei Darussalam
Cambodia
Hav Viseth Tel: +855 12 977 567Director of Department of Aquaculture E-mail: [email protected] of the Fisheries AdministrationMinistry of Agriculture, Forestry and FisheriesPhnom PenhCambodia
61
India
P. Jayasankar Tel: +91 674 246 5421/246 5430Director Fax: +91 674 246 5407ICAR-Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture Mobile: +91 094 384 70856(CIFA), Kausalyaganga, Bhubaneswar - 751 002 E-mail: [email protected]
Indonesia
Coco Kokarkin Soetrisno Tel/Fax: +62 (021) 788 31914Director for Fish Production Mobile: +62813 9953 6677DG of Aquaculture E-mail: [email protected] of Marine Affairs and FisheriesJalan Medan Merdeka Timur No. 16Jakarta 10110, Indonesia
Shahandra Hanitiyo Tel: +62 (021) 351 9070 Ext. 7155Assistant Deputy Director for United Nations Mobile: +628 13 8720 1772Cooperation, Secretariat General Fax: +62 (021) 386 4293Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries E-mail: [email protected] Medan Merdeka Timur No. 16Jakarta 10110, Indonesia
Sri Pudji Sinarnl Dewi (Ms) Tel: +6221 7805052Assistant Deputy Director for Technical Services Mobile: +62813 1484 6843and Cooperation Fax: +6221 7815101Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries E-mail: [email protected] Medan Merdeka Timur No. 16Jakarta 10110, Indonesia
Lao PDR
Thongkhoun Khonglaliane Tel: +856 21 215242, 856 20 22465634Director of Namxouang Aquaculture Development Fax: +856 21 215141Center, Department of Livestock and Fisheries E-mail: [email protected]. Box 6644 VientianeLao PDR
Malaysia
Ahmad Faizal bin Mohamed Omar Tel: +603 8870 4762Senior Fisheries Officer Mobile: +6019 381 7402Department of Fisheries Malaysia Fax: +603 8889 1794Aquaculture Development Division E-mail: [email protected] Floor, Podium 2, Block 4G2Wisma Tani, Precinct 4Federal Government Administrative Centre62628 Putrajaya, Malaysia
Maldives
Hassan Shakeel Tel: +960 332 2242Senior Biologist Fax: +960 332 2509Marine Research Center, H. White Waves E-mail: [email protected] Hingun, Male 2002Republic of Maldives
62
Myanmar
Sone Mine Tel: +95 9 402 506 342Assistant Director E-mail: [email protected] of FisheriesMinistry of Livestock, Fisheries and Rural DevelopmentHlaw-gar Fishery StationYangon, Myanmar
Nepal
Rama Nanda Mishra Tel: +977 985 113 2662Program Director Fax: +977 143 508 33Directorate of Fisheries Development E-mail: [email protected] Fisheries Building, Machha Pokhari, Balaju,KathmanduNepal
Pakistan
Shoukat Hussain Tel: 021 992 14890Director General E-mail: [email protected] Fisheries Department, KarachiMinistry of Ports & Shipping (Fisheries Wing)Fish Harbour, West Wharf, Karachi 74000Pakistan
Philippines
Nelson A Lopez Tel/Fax: +63 2 929 3439Chief E-mail: [email protected] Fisheries and Aquaculture DivisionBureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources2/F PHILCOA Building, Elliptical RoadDiliman, Quezon City 1106Philippines
Thailand
Varin Tanasomwang (Ms) Tel: +66 2 940 6211Senior Expert on Fisheries Management Mobile: +66 8 1208 3311Floor 6 Chulaporn Building Fax: +66 2 562 0571Department of Fisheries E-mail: [email protected] Klang, ChatuchakBangkok 10900, Thailand
Jintana Nugranad (Ms) Tel: +66 2 579 8078Senior Expert on Coastal Aquaculture Fax: +66 2 562 0571Department of Fisheries E-mail: [email protected] Klang, ChatuchakBangkok 10900, Thailand
Waraporn Prompoj (Ms) Tel: +66 2 562 0540Senior Expert on International Fisheries Affairs Fax: +66 2 562 0571Department of Fisheries E-mail: [email protected] Klang, ChatuchakBangkok 10900, Thailand
63
Timor-Leste
Augusto Fernandes Tel: +670 773 1822National Director for Fisheries & Aquaculture E-mail: [email protected] Nicolau, Lobato, ComoroDili, Timor-Leste
Viet Nam
Nguyen Huy Dien Tel: +84 904 592 266Deputy Director General of Fisheries Administration E-mail: [email protected] of Agricultural Rural Development10 Nguyen Cong HoanHanoi, Viet Nam
Chau Thi Tuyet Hanh (Ms) Tel: +84 4 3724 5389Senior officer Fax: +84 4 3724 5120Ministry of Agricultural Rural Development E-mail: [email protected] Nguyen Cong HoanHanoi, Viet Nam
Regional Organizations
Cherdsak Virapat Tel: +66 2 561 1728Director General Mobile: +66 83 198 2201Network of Aquaculture Centres in Asia-Pacific Fax: +66 2 561 1727Suraswadi Building, Department of Fisheries E-mail: [email protected] UniversityLadyao, ChatuchakBangkok 10900, Thailand
Simon Wilkinson Tel: +66 2 561 1728Communication Coordinator Fax: +66 2 561 1727Network of Aquaculture Centres in Asia-Pacific E-mail: [email protected] Building, Department of FisheriesKasetsart UniversityLadyao, ChatuchakBangkok 10900, Thailand
Yuan Derun Tel: +66 2 561 1728Education & Training Program Coordinator Fax: +66 2 561 1727Network of Aquaculture Centres in Asia-Pacific E-mail: [email protected] Building, Department of FisheriesKasetsart UniversityLadyao, ChatuchakBangkok 10900, Thailand
Kuldeep K Lal Tel: +66 2 561 1728Genetics and Biodiversity Program Coordinator Fax: +66 2 561 1727Network of Aquaculture Centres in Asia-Pacific E-mail: [email protected] Building, Department of FisheriesKasetsart UniversityLadyao, ChatuchakBangkok 10900, Thailand
64
Arlene Nietes-Satapornvanit Tel: +66 2 561 1728Gender Programe Coordinator Fax: +66 2 561 1727Network of Aquaculture Centres in Asia-Pacific E-mail: [email protected] Building, Department of FisheriesKasetsart UniversityLadyao, ChatuchakBangkok 10900, Thailand
Anton Immink Tel: +44 7964 888 628Global Aquaculture Director E-mail:Sustainable Fisheries Partnership (SFP) [email protected] Corn Mill, Stirling FK7 8EWScotland, UK
Michael Phillips Tel: +604 626 1606Discipline Director (Aquaculture and Genetics) Fax: +604 626 5530WorldFish E-mail: [email protected] Batu Maung, Batu MaungBayan LepasMalaysia
John Benzie Tel: +604 626 1606Principal Scientist (Aquaculture and Genetics) Fax: +604 626 5530WorldFish E-mail: [email protected] Batu Maung, Batu MaungBayan LepasMalaysia
Chumnarn Pongsri Tel: +66 2 940 6326Secretary-General Fax: +66 2 940 6336SEAFDEC E-mail: [email protected] Building, Department of FisheriesKasetsart University CampusBangkok 10900, Thailand
Felix Ayson Tel: +63 33 330 7000Chief Fax: +63 33 330 7002SEAFDEC-AQD E-mail: [email protected], IliloPhilippines
Donor Agencies
Timothy Moore Tel: +66 2 229 3131Chief of Party, USAID Maximizing Agricultural Revenue Mobile: +66 92 729 6542through Knowledge, Enterprise Development, E-mail: [email protected] Trade ProjectManaged by Nathan Associates Inc.Kenan Institute Asia Office, Bangkok, Thailand
Chatri Moonstan Tel: +66 2 204 6500Senior Program Officer Mobile: +66 89 670 5528The Royal Norwegian Embassy, Bangkok Fax: +66 2 262 0218UBC II Bldg, 18th Floor 591 E-mail: [email protected] Soi 33 Bangkok 10110, Thailand
65
Yngve Torgersen Tel: +47 22 24 65 15Director Mobile: +47 901 43 951Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture E-mail: [email protected] of Industry, Trade and FisheriesP.O. Box 8090 Dep0032 Oslo Norway
Chanyapach Unhajata (Ms) Tel: +66 2 696 3000 Ext. 581Political Assistant E-mail: [email protected] of Japan177 Wittayu Road, Lumpini, PathumwanBangkok 10330, Thailand
Mark Prein Tel: +49 6196 79-1471Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture Mobile: +49 151 46147153Agriculture and Rural Development Division Fax: +49 6196 79-801471Deutsche Gesellschaft für E-mail: [email protected] Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbHP.O. Box 518065726 EschbornGermany
Consultants
Patrick White Tel: +33 678 619 186Senior Aquaculture Consultant E-mail: [email protected] – NIVA, BP 411Cedex 26402, DromeFrance
Pedro B Bueno Tel: +66 81 7316 594,Consultant Tel: +66 02 158 65192/387 Prasert Manukitch Road, Senanikom E-mail: [email protected], Bangkok 10900, Thailand
FAO
Rohana Subasinghe Tel: +39 06 5705 6473Chief Fax: +39 06 5705 3020Aquaculture Branch E-mail: [email protected] and Aquaculture Management DivisionFisheries and Aquaculture DepartmentFood and Agriculture Organization of the UNViale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 RomeItaly
Matthias Halwart Tel: +39 06 5705 5080Senior Aquaculture Officer Fax: + 39 06 5705 3020Fisheries and Aquaculture Management Division E-mail: [email protected] and Aquaculture DepartmentFood and Agriculture Organization of the UNViale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 RomeItaly
66
Simon Funge-Smith Tel: +66 2 697 4149Senior Fishery Officer Fax: +66 2 697 4445FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific E-mail: [email protected] Phra Athit RoadBangkok 10200, Thailand
Miao Weimin Tel: +66 2 697 4119Aquaculture Officer Fax: +66 2 697 4445FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific E-mail: [email protected] Phra Athit RoadBangkok 10200, Thailand
viii
For further information please contact:
FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific
39 Phra Athit Road
Bangkok 10200
Thailand
Tel: (+66) 2 697 4000
Fax: (+66) 2 697 4445
E-mail: [email protected]
