Registered Mail Service of Summons Petition for Writ with Exhibits and Intervention DCD 10-cv-00151

8/14/2019 Registered Mail Service of Summons Petition for Writ with Exhibits and Intervention DCD 10-cv-00151

1/181


2/181

-/ 0 44 0 (Rev. 12/09) Summons in a Civil ActionUNITED TATES ISTRICT OURT

for the

District of Columbia

Dr. Orfy Taitz 1

Plaint.$11

v. 1 Case: 1 : 0-cv-00151Barack Hussein Obama ) Assigned To : Lamberth, Royce C.

1 Assign. Date : /27/2010o e f e ~ ) Description: Pro Se Gen Civil

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defehnt's name and address) Barack Hussein Obama - -,c/o the White House ,= L?

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.= .",;cl:

r C - z r A

Washington District of Columbia 2050 0 r"e - d

L-- t)" 3 - I

ru - 4 m r- \ng;< - ( sxrn 0A lawsuit has been filed against you. --5-4 Cr SJ'P"

F 4

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) - 6 0 H y s if youare th e United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R Civ.P. 12 (aX2) or (3) -you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 ofthe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiffs attorney,whose name and address are: Dr. Orly Taitz

29839 Santa Margarita ParkwaySuite 100Rancho Santa Margarita, California 9268 8

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

Date: I @ / 0ki-k 0 Clerk


3/181

Case 1:10-cv-00151-RCL Document 1 Filed 01/27/10 Page 1 of 95


4/181



5/181



6/181



7/181



8/181



9/181



10/181



11/181


12/181



13/181



14/181



15/181



16/181


17/181



18/181



19/181


20/181



21/181



22/181


23/181



24/181



25/181



26/181



27/181



28/181


29/181



30/181



31/181



32/181


33/181


34/181



35/181


36/181



37/181



38/181


39/181


40/181


41/181



42/181



43/181



44/181



45/181



46/181



47/181



48/181


49/181



50/181



51/181



52/181



53/181



54/181



55/181


56/181


57/181



58/181



59/181



60/181



61/181



62/181



63/181



64/181



65/181



66/181



67/181



68/181


69/181



70/181



71/181


72/181


73/181



74/181



75/181



76/181



77/181



78/181



79/181



80/181



81/181



82/181


83/181



84/181



85/181



86/181



87/181



88/181



89/181


90/181



91/181



92/181



93/181


94/181



95/181



96/181



97/181



98/181

Case 1:10-cv-00151-RCL Document 1-1 Filed 01/27/10 Page 1 of 2


99/181

Case 1:10-cv-00151-RCL Document 1-1 Filed 01/27/10 Page 2 of 2


100/181

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COU RTFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUM BIA

............................................................... XDr. Orly Taitz, PRO S E

2 9 8 3 9 Santa Margarita Parkway, STE 100 5Rancho Santa ~a rg a r it a A 9 2 6 8 8 Tel: (949) 683-541 1; Fax (949) 7 6 6 - 7 6 0 3 Civil Action: 10-CV-00151E-Mail: dr [email protected] (RCL)

Plaintiff,

v.

Barack Hussein Obama,

C/OThe White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W. 8Washington, District of Columbia 2 0 5 0 0

Defendant. i- -

CHRISTOPHER-EARL: STRUNK IN ESSE NOTICE OF MO TION TO INTERV ENEAS A EX-RELATOR INTERVENER -PLAINTIFF.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that upon the annexed affidavit of Christopher-Earl : Strunk, bySpecial-Appearance, affirmed January 29,20 10 will move this Court to intervene as a ex-relatorintervener-plaintiff before Chief District Judge Royce C. Lemberth at time afforded by theCourt if necessary at the United States Courthouse, at 333 Constitution Avenue NW WashingtonDistrict of Columbia, on the day and month in 2010, at a time and courtroom designated by thecourt, or as soon thereafter as counsel can be heard.

Dated: J a n u a r y ,9 2010Brooklyn New Y or i

Brooklyn, New York1

1238Email: [email protected] 1-6767Christopher-Earl: Strunk O in esse

cc: listing of service to follow


101/181

The Honorable Richard J. LeonUnited States District Judge for theU.S. District for the District of Columbia333 Constitution Avenue, NW, Room 6315,Washington, DC 20001

Dr. Orly Taitz, D.D.S.29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, STE 100Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688

Channing Philips, the U.S. Attorneyc/o Wynne P. Kelly, AUSA Office of the U.S. Attorney for the Washington District of Columbia555 4th St., N.W.Washington, D.C. 20530

Eric Holder, U.S. Attorney Generalc/o Brigham John Bowen, AUSAU.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 20 Massachusetts Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20530

Barack Hussein Obama in essec/o The White House1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NWWashington, DC 20500


102/181

- 1 -

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

---------------------------------------------------------------xDr. Orly Taitz, PRO SE 29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, STE 100 Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688 Tel: (949) 683-5411; Fax (949) 766-7603 Civil Action: 10-CV-00151 E-Mail: dr [email protected] (RCL)

Plaintiff,

and

Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse, AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT

593 Vanderbilt Avenue - #281 Brooklyn., New York 11238 OF INTERVENTION AS A (845) 901-6767 Email: [email protected]

EX-RELATOR-PLAINTIFF Ex-relator-Intervener-Plaintiff.

IN THE QUO WARRANTOv.

PETITION FOR WRITBarack Hussein Obama , c/o The White House OF MANDAMUS 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, District of Columbia 20500

Defendant.

--------------------------------------------------------x

STATE OF NEW YORK )) ss.:

COUNTY OF KINGS )

I, ChristopherEarl: Strunk in esse, being duly sworn, depose and say:

1. Affirmant place for service is 593 Vanderbilt Avenue #281 Brooklyn,

New York 11238 with telephone 845-901-6767 and email; [email protected].


103/181

- 2 -

2. Affirmant files this Affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion to

Intervene as an Ex-relator Intervener-Plaintiff with FRCvP Rule 19(a) (1) and 24 (2).

3. That Affirmant is a required party herein and whose joinder will not

deprive the court of subject matter jurisdiction; and that Affirmant claims an

1 FRCvP Rule 19. Required Joinder of Parties. (a) Persons Required to Be Joined if Feasible. (1) Required Party. A person who is subject to service of process and whose

joinder will not deprive the court of subject-matter jurisdiction must be joined as a party if:(A) in that person's absence, the court cannot accord complete relief among existingparties; or (B) that person claims an interest relating to the subject of the action and isso situated that disposing of the action in the person's absence may: (i) as a practicalmatter impair or impede the person's ability to protect the interest; or (ii) leave anexisting party subject to a substantial risk of incurring double, multiple, or otherwiseinconsistent obligations because of the interest.(2) Joinder by Court Order. If a person has not been joined as required, the courtmust order that the person be made a party. A person who refuses to join as a plaintiff may be made either a defendant or, in a proper case, an involuntary plaintiff.(3) Venue. If a joined party objects to venue and the joinder would make venueimproper, the court must dismiss that party.

2 FRCvP Rule 24. Intervention(a) Intervention of Right. On timely motion, the court must permit anyone to

intervene who: (1) is given an unconditional right to intervene by a federal statute; or(2) claims an interest relating to the property or transaction that is the subject of theaction, and is so situated that disposing of the action may as a practical matter impairor impede the movant's ability to protect its interest, unless existing parties adequatelyrepresent that interest.

(b) Permissive Intervention. (1) In General. On timely motion, the court maypermit anyone to intervene who: (A) is given a conditional right to intervene by afederal statute; or (B) has a claim or defense that shares with the main action acommon question of law or fact. (2) By a Government Officer or Agency. On timelymotion, the court may permit a federal or state governmental officer or agency tointervene if a party's claim or defense is based on: (A) a statute or executive orderadministered by the officer or agency; or (B) any regulation, order, requirement, oragreement issued or made under the statute or executive order. (3) Delay or Prejudice.In exercising its discretion, the court must consider whether the intervention willunduly delay or prejudice the adjudication of the original parties' rights.

(c) Notice and Pleading Required. A motion to intervene must be served on theparties as provided in Rule 5. The motion must state the grounds for intervention andbe accompanied by a pleading that sets out the claim or defense for which interventionis sought.


104/181

- 3 -

interest relating to the subject of the action and is so situated that disposing of the

action in the person's absence may: (i) as a practical matter impair or impede

Affirmants ability to protect the interest; and or (ii) leave Dr. Taitz as an existing

party subject to a substantial risk of incurring double, multiple, or otherwise

inconsistent obligations because of the interest.

4. Affirmant is an ex-relator Plaintiff with 28 USC 1345 (3) seeking to

recover the Office of the President of the United States (POTUS) for Joseph Biden,

now is President of the U.S. Senate. in which this Court has jurisdiction with 28

USC 1343 (4), based upon Defendants intent 28 USC 1344 (5), 28 USC 1357 (6),

3 1345. United States as plaintiff - Except as otherwise provided by Act of Congress, thedistrict courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions, suits or proceedings commencedby the United States, or by any agency or officer thereof expressly authorized to sue by Act of Congress.4 1343. Civil rights and elective franchise. (a) The district courts shall have original

jurisdiction of any civil action authorized by law to be commenced by any person: (1) To recoverdamages for injury to his person or property, or because of the deprivation of any right orprivilege of a citizen of the United States, by any act done in furtherance of any conspiracymentioned in section 1985 of Title 42; (2) To recover damages from any person who fails toprevent or to aid in preventing any wrongs mentioned in section 1985 of Title 42 which he hadknowledge were about to occur and power to prevent; (3) To redress the deprivation, undercolor of any State law, statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage, of any right, privilege orimmunity secured by the Constitution of the United States or by any Act of Congress providingfor equal rights of citizens or of all persons within the jurisdiction of the United States; (4) Torecover damages or to secure equitable or other relief under any Act of Congress providing forthe protection of civil rights, including the right to vote.

(b) For purposes of this section (1) the District of Columbia shall be considered to bea State; and (2) any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall beconsidered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.5 1344. Election disputes. The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil actionto recover possession of any office, except that of elector of President or Vice President, UnitedStates Senator, Representative in or delegate to Congress, or member of a state legislature,authorized by law to be commenced, where in it appears that the sole question touching the titleto office arises out of denial of the right to vote, to any citizen offering to vote, on account of race, color or previous condition of servitude.


105/181

- 4 -

28 USC 1361 (7) , 42 USC 1985 (8) with related law accordingly and District of

The jurisdiction under this section shall extend only so far as to determine the rights of the parties to office by reason of the denial of the right, guaranteed by the Constitution of theUnited States and secured by any law, to enforce the right of citizens of the United States to votein all the States.6 1357. Injuries under Federal laws. The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of anycivil action commenced by any person to recover damages for any injury to his person orproperty on account of any act done by him, under any Act of Congress, for the protection orcollection of any of the revenues, or to enforce the right of citizens of the United States to vote inany State.7 1361. Action to compel an officer of the United States to perform his duty. The districtcourts shall have original jurisdiction of any action in the nature of mandamus to compel anofficer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to theplaintiff.8 1985. Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights. (1) Preventing officer from performingduties. If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to prevent, by force,intimidation, or threat, any person from accepting or holding any office, trust, or place of confidence under the United States, or from discharging any duties thereof; or to induce by likemeans any officer of the United States to leave any State, district, or place, where his duties as anofficer are required to be performed, or to injure him in his person or property on account of hislawful discharge of the duties of his office, or while engaged in the lawful discharge thereof, orto injure his property so as to molest, interrupt, hinder, or impede him in the discharge of hisofficial duties; (2) Obstructing justice; intimidating party, witness, or juror . If two or morepersons in any State or Territory conspire to deter, by force, intimidation, or threat, any party orwitness in any court of the United States from attending such court, or from testifying to any

matter pending therein, freely, fully, and truthfully, or to injure such party or witness in hisperson or property on account of his having so attended or testified, or to influence the verdict,presentment, or indictment of any grand or petit juror in any such court, or to injure such juror inhis person or property on account of any verdict, presentment, or indictment lawfully assented toby him, or of his being or having been such juror; or if two or more persons conspire for thepurpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of

justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of thelaws, or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws; (3) Depriving persons of rights or privileges. If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire or go in disguiseon the highway or on the premises of another, for the purpose of depriving, either directly or

indirectly, any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equalprivileges and immunities under the laws; or for the purpose of preventing or hindering theconstituted authorities of any State or Territory from giving or securing to all persons withinsuch State or Territory the equal protection of the laws; or if two or more persons conspire toprevent by force, intimidation, or threat, any citizen who is lawfully entitled to vote, from givinghis support or advocacy in a legal manner, toward or in favor of the election of any lawfullyqualified person as an elector for President or Vice President, or as a Member of Congress of theUnited States; or to injure any citizen in person or property on account of such support oradvocacy; in any case of conspiracy set forth in this section, if one or more persons engaged


106/181

- 5 -

Columbia Code (DCC) Chapters 35 (See Endnotes) and 37 (See Endnotes) with related law

in its entirety, and the U.S. Constitution in its entirety especially emphasizing

Article 2 Section 1 (9) and Article 7 Amendment 25 (10) specifically, and

therein do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, wherebyanother is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and exercising any right orprivilege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have an action forthe recovery of damages occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators.

9 Section 1 . The executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.He shall hold his office during the term of four years, and, together with the Vice President,chosen for the same term, be elected, as follows:

Clause 1. Each state shall appoint, in such manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, anumber of electors, equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives to which theState may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or person holding anoffice of trust or profit under the United States, shall be appointed an elector.

Clause 2. The electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for twopersons, of whom one at least shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves. Andthey shall make a list of all the persons voted for, and of the number of votes for each; which listthey shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States,directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of theSenate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates, and the votes shall then be

counted. The person having the greatest number of votes shall be the President, if such numberbe a majority of the whole number of electors appointed; and if there be more than one who havesuch majority, and have an equal number of votes, then the House of Representatives shallimmediately choose by ballot one of them for President; and if no person have a majority, thenfrom the five highest on the list the said House shall in like manner choose the President. But inchoosing the President, the votes shall be taken by States, the representation from each statehaving one vote; A quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from twothirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. In every case,after the choice of the President, the person having the greatest number of votes of the electorsshall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or more who have equal votes, theSenate shall choose from them by ballot the Vice President.

Clause 3. The Congress may determine the time of choosing the electors, and the day onwhich they shall give their votes; which day shall be the same throughout the United States.

No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of theadoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President ; neither shall any personbe eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and beenfourteen Years a resident within the United States. ( emphasis by Affirmant )

Clause 4. In case of the removal of the President from office, or of his death, resignation,or inability to discharge the powers and duties of the said office, the same shall devolve on theVice President, and the Congress may by law provide for the case of removal, death, resignation


107/181

- 6 -

accordingly the U.S. Constitution and laws in relation to the various Constitutions

of the State of New York and the several States in its entirety for the People with

or inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what officer shall then act asPresident, and such officer shall act accordingly, until the disability be removed, or a Presidentshall be elected. ( emphasis by Affirmant )

Clause 5. The President shall, at stated times, receive for his services, a compensation,which shall neither be increased nor diminished during the period for which he shall have beenelected, and he shall not receive within that period any other emolument from the United States,or any of them.

Clause 6. Before he enter on the execution of his office, he shall take the following oathor affirmation:--"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend theConstitution of the United States."10 Amendment XXV.

Section 1. In case of the removal of the President from office or of his death orresignation, the Vice President shall become President.

Section 2. Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the Presidentshall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.

Section 3. Whenever the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senateand the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that he is unable todischarge the powers and duties of his office, and until he transmits to them a written declarationto the contrary, such powers and duties shall be discharged by the Vice President as ActingPresident.

Section 4. Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to thePresident pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives theirwritten declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office,the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as ActingPresident.

Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate andthe Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, heshall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress mayby law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and theSpeaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable todischarge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue,assembling within forty-eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, withintwenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session,within twenty-one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the VicePresident shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shallresume the powers and duties of his office.


108/181

- 7 -

suffrage there in election of the respective electoral college of each State in the

2008 General Election deprived a reasonable expectation of effective participation.

5. Affirmant on January 23, 2009 duly Fired the Defendant for cause

(See Exhibit 1 ) in that Defendant Obama has Dual Allegiance at birth, and

failed to prove eligibility to serve as POTUS and therefore may not use

Affirmants power of attorney as the POTUS trustee / administrator.

6. That on or about May 20, 2009, Affirmant duly served notice by letter

memorandum with the Verified Complaint duly serve notice (See Exhibit 2 ) to

U.S. Attorney Jeffery Taylor and U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder for a Quo

Warranto Inquest on the Defendant Obama in accordance with DCC Chapter 35

16-3502 for The Attorney General of the United States or the United States

Attorney who may institute a proceeding pursuant to the subchapter on Affirmants

own motion or on the relation of a third person in the matter of infliction of injury.

7. That on or about May 27, 2009, Affirmant filed a Cross Motion with

attachments, including the duplicate Verified Complaint (See Exhibit 3 ) for a Quo

Warranto at Exhibit 15 as shown as Exhibit 2, to proceed with DCC Chapter 35

Section 16-3503 as the ex-relator Plaintiff in the case Strunk v. US Department

of States et al. DCD 08-cv-2234 alleging that: (i) on or about February 2, 2009

Defendant Barack Hussein Obama and Eric Holder (the Usurpers) injured

Affirmant by the Usurpers bad faith breach of substantive due process in


109/181

- 8 -

conjunction within DCD 08-cv-2234 by not notifying Plaintiff of replacement of

then Counsel U.S. Attorney Jeffery Taylor and or his agent; (ii) the direct injury to

Affirmant related to the fact that Affirmant on January 23, 2009 duly Fired the

Defendant for cause in that Defendant Obama has Dual Allegiance at birth, and

failed to prove eligibility to serve as POTUS, and (iii) Defendant Obama with Dual

Allegiance is ineligible to serve as the Administer and Trustee of Affirmants

power of attorney over Affirmants personal account at the U.S. Department of

Treasury; (iv) that subsequent to duly firing Barack Hussein Obama (a.k.a. Barry

Soetoro, a.k.a. Steve Dunham, a.k.a. Birdie Obama) Affirmant asset is

wasting as a direct personal injury on-going by Defendants mis-administration

and mis-application of the fiduciary duties of the Trustee and Administrator,

accordingly the subject of a pending Replevin with District of Columbia Code

Chapter 37 (See Exhibit 4 ); and (v) furthermore, Defendant Obama in conspiracy

with Eric Holder and other(s) yet named have denied President Joseph Biden, now

serving as President of the U.S. Senate, his rightful Office as the President of the

United States. Affirmant is the Ex-relator in that Eric Holder and Jeffery Taylor

failed to act to recover President Bidens rightful office accordingly with the due

process of law under DCC Chapter 35 empowers Ex-relator to act for the U.S.A.;

and accordingly Ex-relator wishes a Declaratory Judgment on the Law with 28


110/181


111/181

- 10 -

8. To date Judge Richard J. Leon has not issued a decision on the Cross

Motion in that Defendants Counsel therein argued that a FOIA Complaint may not

be converted, and as such the matter remains pending; however, by judicial notice

of this Motion to Intervene herein, Judge Leon and Counsel in Strunk v. US

Department of States et al. DCD 08-cv-2234 are duly notified, with a request to

sever the issue from that case to this matter of intervention (See Exhibit 5 ).

9. That Affirmants Intervention as of right is governed by Rule 24(a),

which provides the right to intervene is unconditionally granted by federal statute

with above cited and footnotes laws and with the DCC Chapter 35 and 37 cited in

the Endnotes; and accordingly when a non-party right to intervene shows that:

a) Affirmants motion to intervene is timely filed by Local Rules as herein;

b) Affirmant has an interest relating to the property or transaction that is the

subject of the action

c) That Affirmant is so situated that without intervention the disposition of the

action may as a practical matter impair or impede Affirmant ability to protect

interest in the cases Strunk v. US DOS et al. DCD 08-cv-2234, Strunk v US

DOC Bureau of Census et al. DCD 09-cv-1295, Strunk v. The New York

Province of the Society of Jesus et al. DCD 09-cv-1249, Strunk v US

Department of Interior et al. 10-cv-0066, ACORN et al. v. U.S.A. et al. EDNY

09-cv-4888 (NG) and Strunk v. Paterson et al. NYS Supreme Court in Kings

County Index no.: 08-29642 before the Honorable New York Supreme Court

Justice David I. Schmidt.


112/181

- 11 -

d) Affirmants interest is not adequately represented by existing parties, in that the

Usurpers Attorney General and or his agents have not vigorously represented

U.S.A. Citizens, the State Of New York Citizens and or any other States

citizens of the several States accordingly, and as such Affirmant as the Ex-

Relator litigant herein, it is necessary Affirmatives claims be entered into the

record herein.

e) That Affirmant contends that after due notice required by law the Defendant

Barack Hussein Obama responded in writing with a special demurer on or about

August 26, 2009 (See Exhibit 6 ); however, the U.S. Attorney General Eric

Holder and U.S. Attorney Jeffery Taylor and or his replacement have failed to

respond or otherwise appear, and that Affirmant has exhausted the

administrative process and other available remedy to appear as the ex-relator

afforded by law.10. This case raises important legal and constitutional issues, the

resolution of which has the potential to affect not only the parties to this case but

many non-parties, as well; and that Affirmants intervention, in particular, should

not be rejected as to do so would not contribute to a just and equitable adjudication

of the issues in this case, but instead would be likely to distract both the Court and

the parties when time is of the esse as a national security matter with an ongoing

irreparable harm requiring Affirmant petition supplement with FRCvP R. 15(d).

11. Affirmant has read the foregoing along with Plaintiffs Complaint

with Exhibits filed January 27, 2010 and Affirmant supports Plaintiffs request for

necessary equity relief and that this matter be immediately expedited for due


113/181

process herein with an immediate writ of mandamus with an order of the

Defendant Barack Hussein Obama; the U.S. Attorney Channing Philips, U.S.

Attorney General Eric Holder, President Joseph Biden, and Congress to appear

before this Court to show cause why relief should not be granted for Plaintiff(s),

Ex-relator Intervener-Plaintiff and the People of the U.S.A.; and

12. Accordingly, until such hearing and appearance is had granted,

Affirmant demands a Temporary Restraining Order of Defendant Obama cease

and desist from the duties of POTUS until at such time Congress may act with the

law of the land and or parties appear at a preliminary hearing convened by order of

this Court; and I have read the Verified Quo Warranto Petition for a Writ of

Mandamus and know the contents thereof, and effects those matters have upon me,

and that this affidavit is true to my own knowledge, except as to the matters therein

stated to be alleged on information and belief, and as to. hose matters I believe it to

be true. The grounds of my beliefs as to all matters not stated upon information and

belief are as follows: third parties, books and records, and personal knowledge.

Sworn to before me thisthe 2 4'" day of January 2010

GEORGEANDERSONNotary Public, State of New Yo&

No. 01AN5070990Qualified in Kings County

- 1 2 -Commission Expires Jan. 6, 20 11


114/181

- 13 -

ENDNOTES

DC ST 16-3501 formerly cited as DC ST 1981 16-3501

District of Columbia Official Code 2001 Edition Currentness Division II. Judiciary and Judicial Procedure

Title 16. Particular Actions, Proceedings and Matters. (Refs & Annos)

Chapter 35. Quo Warranto.

Subchapter I. Actions Against Officers of the United States. (Refs & Annos)

16-3501. Persons agai nst w hom issued; civil action.

A quo warranto may be issued from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in thename of the United States against a person who within the District of Columbia usurps, intrudes into,or unlawfully holds or exercises, a franchise conferred by the United States or a public office of theUnited States, civil or military. The proceedings shall be deemed a civil action.

CREDIT(S): (Dec. 23, 1963, 77 Stat. 602, Pub. L. 88-241, 1; July 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 562, Pub. L.91-358, title I, 145(n).); HISTORICAL AND STATUTORY NOTES: Prior Codifications: 1981 Ed., 16-3501., 1973 Ed., 16-3501.; DC CODE 16-3501 Current through October 4, 2009


District of Columbia Official Code 2001 Edition CurrentnessDivision II. Judiciary and Judicial Procedure



Subchapter I. Actions Against Officers of the United States. (Refs & Annos)

16-3503. Refusal of Attorney General or United States attorney to act;procedure.

If the Attorney General or United States attorney refuses to institute a quo warranto proceedingon the request of a person interested, the interested person may apply to the court by certified

petition for leave to have the writ issued. When, in the opinion of the court, the reasons set forthin the petition are sufficient in law, the writ shall be allowed to be issued by any attorney, in thename of the United States, on the relation of the interested person on his compliance with thecondition prescribed by section 16-3502 as to security for costs.

CREDIT(S): (Dec. 23, 1963, 77 Stat. 602, Pub. L. 88-241, 1; July 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 562, Pub.L. 91-358, title I, 145(n).)

HISTORICAL AND STATUTORY NOTES: Prior Codifications - 1981 Ed., 16-3503., 1973


115/181

- 14 -

Ed., 16-3503. DC CODE 16-3503 Current through October 4, 2009

DC ST 16-3543 f ormerly cited as DC ST 1981 16-3543

Division II. Judiciary and Judicial Procedure



Subchapter III. Procedures and Judgments.

16-3543. Proceedings on default.

If the defendant does not appear as required by a writ of quo warranto, after being served, thecourt may proceed to hear proof in support of the writ and render judgment accordingly.

CREDIT(S) : (Dec. 23, 1963, 77 Stat. 603, Pub. L. 88-241, 1; July 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 563, Pub.L. 91-358, title I, 145(n).) HISTORICAL AND STATUTORY NOTES : Prior Codifications-1981 Ed., 16-3543. 1973 Ed., 16-3543.; DC CODE 16-3543 Current through October 4,2009






16-3544. Pleading; jury trial.

In a quo warranto proceeding, the defendant may demur, plead specially, or plead "not guilty" asthe general issue, and the United States or the District of Columbia, as the case may be, mayreply as in other actions of a civil character. Issues of fact shall be tried by a jury if either party

requests it. Otherwise they shall be determined by the court.

CREDIT(S): (Dec. 23, 1963, 77 Stat. 603, Pub. L. 88-241, 1; July 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 563, Pub.L. 91-358, title I, 145(n).); HISTORICAL AND STATUTORY NOTES: Prior Codifications-1981 Ed., 16-3544., 1973 Ed., 16-3544., DC CODE 16-3544 Current through October 4,2009



116/181

- 15 -

District of Columbia Official Code 2001 Edition Currentness





16-3545. Verdict and judgment.

Where a defendant in a quo warranto proceeding is found by the jury to have usurped, intrudedinto, or unlawfully held or exercised an office or franchise, the verdict shall be that he is guilty of the act or acts in question, and judgment shall be rendered that he be ousted and excludedtherefrom and that the relator recover his costs.

CREDIT(S) : (Dec. 23, 1963, 77 Stat. 603, Pub. L. 88-241, 1; July 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 563, Pub.L. 91-358, title I, 145(n).); HISTORICAL AND STATUTORY NOTES: Prior Codifications:1981 Ed., 16-3545., 1973 Ed., 16-3545., DC CODE 16-3545 Current through October 4,2009






16-3548. Recovery of damages from usurper; limitation.

At any time within a year from a judgment in a quo warranto proceeding, the relator may bringan action against the party ousted and recover the damages sustained by the relator by reason of the ousted party's usurpation of the office to which the relator was entitled.

CREDIT(S): (Dec. 23, 1963, 77 Stat. 603, Pub. L. 88-241, 1; July 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 564, Pub.L. 91-358, title I, 145(n).); HISTORICAL AND STATUTORY NOTES: Prior Codifications:1981 Ed., 16-3548., 1973 Ed., 16-3548.; DC CODE 16-3548




117/181

- 16 -

Chapter 37. Replevin.

16-3701. Demand prior to action; costs.

In an action of replevin brought to recover personal property to which the plaintiff is entitled,

that is alleged to have been wrongfully taken by or to be in the possession of and wrongfullydetained by the defendant, it is not necessary to demand possession of the property beforebringing the action; but the costs of the action may be awarded as the court orders.

CREDIT(S): (Dec. 23, 1963, 77 Stat. 604, Pub. L. 88-241, 1.); HISTORICAL ANDSTATUTORY NOTES: Prior Codifications: 1981 Ed., 16-3701., 1973 Ed., 16-3701.; DCCODE 16-3701 Current through October 4, 2009






16-3702. Form of complaint.

A complaint in replevin shall be in the following or equivalent form:

"The plaintiff sues the defendant for (wrongly taking and detaining) (unjustly detaining) the

plaintiff's goods and chattels, to wit: (describe them) of the value of ___ dollars. And the plaintiff claims that the same be taken from the defendant and delivered to him; or, if they are eloigned,that he may have judgment of their value and all mesne profits and damages, which he estimatesat ___ dollars, besides costs."

CREDIT(S): (Dec. 23, 1963, 77 Stat. 604, Pub. L. 88-241, 1.); HISTORICAL ANDSTATUTORY NOTES: Prior Codifications: 1981 Ed., 16-3702., 1973 Ed., 16-3702.; DCCODE 16-3702Current through October 4, 2009.






118/181

- 17 -

16-3703. Affidavit; contents.

At the time of filing a complaint in replevin, the plaintiff, his agent, or attorney shall file anaffidavit stating that --

(1) according to affiant's information and belief, the plaintiff is entitled to recover possession

of chattels proposed to be replevied, being the same described in the complaint;

(2) the defendant has seized and detained or detains the chattels; and

(3) the chattels were not subject to the seizure or detention and were not taken upon a writ of replevin between the parties.

CREDIT(S): (Dec. 23, 1963, 77 Stat. 604, Pub. L. 88-241, 1.); HISTORICAL ANDSTATUTORY NOTES: Prior Codifications: 1981 Ed., 16-3703., 1973 Ed., 16-3703.; DCCODE 16-3703Current through October 4, 2009





16-3704. Undertaking to abide judgment of the court.

At the time of filing a complaint in replevin, the plaintiff shall enter into an undertaking byhimself or his agent with surety, approved by the clerk, to abide by and perform the judgment of the court.

CREDIT(S) : (Dec. 23, 1963, 77 Stat. 604, Pub. L. 88-241, 1.); HISTORICAL ANDSTATUTORY NOTES: Prior Codifications: 1981 Ed., 16-3704., 1973 Ed., 16-3704.; DCCODE 16-3704Current through October 4, 2009






119/181

- 18 -

16-3705. Failure of officer to obtain possession; procedure.

When the officer's return of a writ of replevin issued pursuant to this subchapter is that he hasserved the defendant with copies of the complaint, affidavit, and summons, but that he could notobtain possession of the goods and chattels sued for, the plaintiff may prosecute the action for

the value of the property and damages for detention, or he may renew the writ in order to obtainpossession of the goods and chattels themselves.







16-3707. Default.

If, after notice as provided by section 16-3706, the defendant fails to appear, the court mayproceed as in case of default after personal service.






16-3708. Motion for return of property; procedure; objection to sufficiency of security.

(a) On the taking possession of the goods and chattels by the marshal by virtue of a writ of replevin, the defendant may, on one day's notice to the plaintiff or his attorney, move for a return


120/181

- 19 -

of the property to his possession. Thereupon, the court may inquire into the circumstances andmanner of the defendant's obtaining possession of the property, and, if it seems just, may orderthe property to be returned to the possession of the defendant, to abide the final judgment in theaction. The court may require the defendant to enter into an undertaking with surety or sureties,similar to that required of the plaintiff upon the commencement of the action. In such case, the

court shall render judgment against the surety or sureties, as well as against the defendant.

(b) When it appears that the possession of the property was forcibly or fraudulently obtained bythe defendant, or that the possession, being first in the plaintiff, was procured or retained by thedefendant without authority from the plaintiff, the court may refuse to order the return of theproperty to the possession of the defendant. The defendant may also, on similar notice, object tothe sufficiency of the security in the undertaking of the plaintiff, and the court may requireadditional security, in default of which the property shall be returned to the defendant, but theaction may proceed as if the property had not been taken.

CREDIT(S): (Dec. 23, 1963, 77 Stat. 605, Pub. L. 88-241, 1.); HISTORICAL AND

STATUTORY NOTES: Prior Codifications: 1981 Ed., 16-3708., 1973 Ed., 16-3708.; DCCODE 16-3708Current through October 4, 2009





16-3709. Notice to officer of intention to move for return; duty of officer; time of motion.

If the defendant in an action of replevin notifies the officer taking possession of the property, inwriting, of his intention to make either of the motions specified by section 16-3708, the officershall retain possession of the property until the motion is disposed of, if the motion is filed andnotice given, as provided by section 16-3708, to the plaintiff or his attorney, within two daysthereafter.

CREDIT(S): (Dec. 23, 1963, 77 Stat. 605, Pub. L. 88-241, 1.); HISTORICAL ANDSTATUTORY NOTES: Prior Codifications: 1981 Ed., 16-3709., 1973 Ed., 16-3709.: DCCODE 16-3709Current through October 4, 2009



121/181

- 20 -




16-3710. Determination and measure of plaintiff's damages.

Whether, in an action of replevin, the defendant answers and the issue thereon joined is foundagainst him, or judgment is rendered against him on proper motion under rules of court, or hemakes default after personal service or publication, the plaintiff's damages shall be ascertainedby the jury trying the issue, where one is joined, or by a jury of inquest, where jury trial had beenwaived or there is no issue of fact, and the damages shall be the full value of the goods, if eloigned by the defendant, including, in every case, the loss sustained by the plaintiff by reasonof the detention, and the judgment shall be rendered for the plaintiff accordingly.






16-3713. Judgment where goods are eloigned.

The judgment in a case where the defendant has eloigned the goods sued for, shall be that theplaintiff recover against the defendant the value of the goods as found and the damages soassessed, to be discharged by the return of the things, within ten days after the judgment, withdamages for detention, which the jury shall also assess.

CREDIT(S): (Dec. 23, 1963, 77 Stat. 606, Pub. L. 88-241, 1.); HISTORICAL AND

STATUTORY NOTES: Prior Codifications: 1981 Ed., 16-3713., 1973 Ed., 16-3713.;DC CODE 16-3713


122/181

Affirmant Affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion to Intervene asan Ex-relator Intervener-Plaintiff in Taitz v Obama DCD 10-cv-00151

Exhibit 1


123/181

Ia a t r e of:593 Vsmdertrilt Avenue - 81

Brookrlp New YorkZip Code exempt DMM 122-32

CI~k~pher-Earl: tm& QNot a c a p a t i o z i

Livhg-snulDeelarant

No Third P d e sh c k H& O h n @8@,&a Bany S m n as%,~ a ~ ~ he ,a l k ( a ~ ~ ~ ~ & ~ ~DBA BARACE:HSJSSEIN O B U NC.-VEOR(S), W S ) , GENTCS),MSLCI?(S]I n a n E ~ f :the AGENT m* HARGE OF THEUNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE9tJF~e ft3avmmmf rmd Pubfic lairs245 M.lrpay Drive*Budding 410,Washingtan, DC 0223

NOTICE TO THE AGENT IS NOTICE TO P W C I PA L NOTICE TO PRFNCIPALIS NOTICE TO AGENT

RE: FFER OF CONTRACTReceived 20 January 2009 and received 21 January 2009

FOR TEE RECORDRlETURN A M ) EDRAPT

TIMELY1 WITHOUT DISHONORWrrH THE W S l 3 U m SPECIAL-APPlURANCE

NOT A COWORATIONThe Lming-Soul

Atmhents:Oath of 20 January 2009 offer for mntrmt /Returned & R e d d b d

* Oath of 21 darmary 2009 off= for csntract IReturnd & R** Notice to the Clerk of Records

Judicial Notice b e of 2 )* Judicial Notice @age 2 of21

! :


124/181

Ohms md US chief

mixed S~te3. ' '

President Obama; "And will to the best of my abili

P r e s i h t O W a : "Pmewe, pratect and defend the cmStates. "

Robertr;: "So help me e d . "

Pm'sidet O b a : Sb help me Go&"

R & m "And will to toe best &my abiiity .


125/181

Roberts, O b d ' lh m ! ~ P W i t i j d

: m i d Wa l Qath FOX News

B m c k Bbma 3tirmE:ed $qhllj w w rbrief, awkward m m w d in an o t h e w b

ing fine, T*whi& BE reS&if r e p a b

mingm la@ TechniGalty,mmifg pmidenf beginsat

- - 8 7 - - - -

the Offlce of President of th e ljnitea States, and I will to the k t f my

n m n Jm. 20

TRANSCRIPTF O A T ~ ~ E ~4

CJ Roberts. -Are you p&ai#lBHO : "I am.' sJ

BHO : --.- - - - - 'to t h e b -

BHO: "#at 1 will&xGicuPe..CJ Roberts: "faithfully ...the OfF1~3 f President of We Uniied Sd.-BHO : 'fhe W e f President of the United States faitbfullflC J R o b e W "and l w l t o t l i e besfofmyabili y...BHO: 'en= ! !! ta a& hest of my stiility..

8HO: "CJ Roberts: *...preserve protectand defend fheCai~stitutioA

". preseTve protect arro' defend the Cmstifufr"0n f the t .CJ Roberts: "So he:^ ybti God"BHO : *So help me Gad",

'4 'U.S: Cadtutioion A r We 2 Section 1 Clause 8. .. I do olernnlv swear tor aHim

the ~o~wfttutionf the united ~ t a ~ s . " w ; J P - d ~


126/181

NOTlCE TO W E CLERKOF RECORDS

Ttit minnte yon d v e ny recod, document, paper, proceeding,map, book or o d ~ m hing depOsitea withyou, you are commhhg aim= against justice d m evised S W t s of the United Stam First Section43 Congms, Sections 5403,5407 aad 5408 totaling up to $9,000 in h w nd up o 12 years in prison pma&hvityaufailtoremrd T i t l e l 8 U S C ~ m 2 0 7 1 tsocaui-kqimpriisonmentanddkplification of&- If p u t county attorney toid you not to file any documents like mine, yon arestill rsspomible, as I da no acmpte d-party-intebvenem. Any attorney, district attorney, or q m eh m he hwydng d am dl parties and do not have a licu~se o make a legal detmmhation inthis matter as they do not represent M e nd Yau, the oomty c l e o not have the authority to r e p m tMe. Should You fail to uphold Your swom o& and +rm your duties I will h v e no choice but torcwrd aaAiiaaVit of C r i m i d Complaint agahtst Your am d Liend a mpy to Your bonding company.

Title I X X 4 ~ , - C W . 4 . CIUMES AGAINST JUSTICE

5-03. Every person who willfully destroys M attempts to deshoy, or, with intent to steal or d m y ,takes and carries away any mmd, paper, or promding of a c o w of justice, filed or deposited with anyc l d or oEcer of so& court, or any papa, or document, or record fled or depasikd in any public ofice,or wid^any udicial or public officer, &dl, withunt rehmce o the vaIue of the record, paper, d o m e d ,or procGediag srr taken, pay a h e f not more than wo thousand dollars, or s* imprisonment, at hardl a b , aot mwe thaa ree ywm, or both: [S* Q 8 54083411,54 t 4.1 Titie =.- C - . - H.4.CRIMES AGAINST msnm h, ablic-ds.)

SC5407. If wo or more peasons in m y State or Taritory conspire for the purpose of mpedinghindering. o b c h g r defeating, a any m, he d m ome ofjustice in any State or Territory, withintent d q o my citizen the equd protection of the aws, or to in* him or his property fu r lawhllywforcin& or att~tllpting o enforce, the right of any person, or class of person, to the equal protection ofthelaws, ewhofsochpersonshall beprmishedby a f in eo fn o t l~ tb an ~e hm dr ed no rm or e~ f i vethomaad dollam, or by imprkoammt, witb or w i t h u t harrl I&ra w t less than si x month nor more tbansix years, or by both sueh h e nd imprisonmeai. S w 5 9 1977-1 991,2004201 0,5506-5510.1 Tide LXX- IUMES. - K.4. CRIMES AGAINST JUSTICE (Conspiracy to defeat enfammart of he laws.)SEC5408. Evwy officer, having the custody of my m r d , document, paper, or proceding specified ine m ifty-fim hundrcd and three, who f m d d d y akes away, or withdraws, or destroys any soahrwmd, d o c m m t , paper, or p m c d k g filed in his OEM r depsi tsd with him or in his cmtody, shallpay a fine of not more fhan two hougand dollars, or d e r migrisoammt at bard labor not more than threeyms, r bob and W moreaver, Wcit his office and be oreva d k w a r d disqualified froan holdingarry ofice u a d a he Govmment of the United States. @esbyiug record by oEca in charge.)

S d o n 2071. Concealment, ternoval, or mutilation geblmlly

(a) Whoever wiifulIy and unlawfUflyc m c d s , removes, mutilates, obliterab, or d a m p , wattmnpts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and canim away my record, proceeding, map,book, paper, documen5 or other thing, flbd or dtposited with any clak or o f i c a of any mnd ofthe United W , r in any public office, or with any jdicia! orpublic o 5 c a of h e UnitedStates, shall be h a under ihs title w imprisoned not more tban k ears, or both

(b) Wh-, M g he wstody of my such eed., proceeding, map, book, doarmeat, paper, orother thing, wiIl l l ly and d a w f d y c o n a d s , removes, mutilates, obliterates,fddies, or destroysthe same, Bhall be ined unda his itle or imprimned mot more than tbrae years, M h t h ; d h dfo r f e i t his office andbe disqualified ftwn ho?di~~g ny office mdu the United States. As used inthis subsection, the t m ~ f f i ~ e "oes not include the oftice held by my pason as a reaired officerof he Armed F o m of the United States.


127/181

[While the misrcpresentetiw of a matend fact, pgst or present may eonslim basisfor an inf- of 1 Viad." any act omission o &ih holvesa breach oflewl duty, m r cmf~denccustly r e p o d and is injurious m another.or hy which an undue advantage is taken of another, may become the hundation fari n f ~f fraud, aud wtren them is a duty to tk o o ~ l m e r r t fa matetiidfact may b qually rts wrongful as t positive misctpnsenhtbn. Tex. iv. App. 1943Ruebeck t*, Hrt ~ t t .171 SW2d895, Wwmed I v6 S1Ud 7382 I42 T m 67i I50 A. L. R""5.1

(Party having supmior knowWge who takes ahan- of mother's ignoramx of helaw to deceiivs him by studied canceatment or mismpremtatiwr can be held reqm-sible fb r that conduct. rex. 1987. Fina Sup&. Im v. rfbileneNati~~nul k 26SW2d S3A

[We judge5j have na mom ight ta declinettu3

exercise ofjraisdiction which i s given,(thb will include the county court of recod jradgg Victw CariIlo) than lo usurp tha~which is n d given. The one or the other would be - to the C.nnstitution."Chhm v. 6 Kkut 264. (1821); U.S v. WiIJ, 499 US. M.I

r(W)hea a governmwa becomes a p a t w in my imdhp company, i r diva^^ h l f ,s(l far tls t m c e n c ~ he mwactim of dmt cornparry. of its sovereign c b t c r , andt a b hat of a private c m . -I t &ends to a level with t b a with whom it associatei ~ i f ,nd rakes the c w hich b b g s to its asxxiahts and to the businesswhich is to be transacted.* &rnk tfUhiledSIata v. PI MI^ Bank r lfUmr~iu22 US. 04(l rP24I. J

["The United States as drawee of cdmmemial p p r tands in no dierent light tfianany o h r drawee." "The IJpited S t a t u does business on busirmtss terms. t is no texem@ fKHn the gem1 rules governing the ii@mand duties of drawees by thelargmts of its deaIinp and ts having& employ agents to do what ifdone by aprincipal in p m m would kave no mom for d m M WCI@& Mt C h v. United,SCLICRP.18 iLS. 36311 943),]

1C- enforcing mem saaates do mot act judicially, but rninkwialiy, having najudieial lmulunky, and unlike Corpts of LAW, do not obtain jlPisdition by m i c e ofpmm nor even by A m s t and Compelled Appemme." BanueII v. Qrir, 9 HOW&336, 34x1

VWant uf jurisdiction may not be cured by msmt ofthe ~ ' e s . " ~ i d . t r l r l i i t > nAsstxiation E CL R. 23 U S 10.3 13.1


128/181

[ Judicial Notice ]

1. ["A judgment rendered in violation of due process is void" World Wde VoIKrwagotW d e r r , 444 US. 86,29 I ; National Bmtk v. WiZey, 195 US 257; Penmyer v. Ne_t95 US 7143

[ ",.. the .mpkmmts of due process must b met Wore th e court can properly assert inpersomnt j ~ c t i o n " eZIsFargo v. W e bFargo, 56 F2d 406,416.1

[. Notification of egal respnsibiity is we essential of due process of law."C o d & . Geaeral Combwdion Co., 269 US 385,3911

[. w A ~ w h i c h e i t h e r f o r b i & o r r e q ~ ~ d o ' m g o f m ~ i n ~ s o v a g u e t h a tmen of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to itsapplication,violates the tmntial of due process of aw." C o d I y v. GeneralComimction Co.. 269 U.S. 3 8539 ]

[. nWhenever it appears that the court lacks subject matter juzisdiction, the a n t isobliged to dismiss the actiua" Elly v. Coastal Cop., 503 U.S. 131,136-37; U S. v.Texar, 252 F. Supp 234,2541

[. " O n o e ~ c t i o n s challenged, the court cannot proceed when it clearly s p p e a ~ sthat the court lacks jurisdiction, the court has no authority to reach merits, but, rathershould d i e he &m'' Melo v, US, 05 F.2d 10261

is no d i d o n o ignore lack o f ~ c t i c m " oyce v. US, 74 F 26 2151


129/181

Affirmant Affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion to Intervene asan Ex-relator Intervener-Plaintiff in Taitz v Obama DCD 10-cv-00151

Exhibit 2


130/181

Case 1:08-cv-02234-RJL Document 19-2 Filed 06/01/2009 Page 213 of 243


131/181



132/181



133/181



134/181



135/181

U.S. and ex Rel. Strunk v. Barack Hussein Obama DCDC

Quo Warranto Complaint Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA--------------------------------------------------

In the Quo Warranto matter of the united States of America

and ex relator Christopher-Earl : Strunk in esse

Plaintiff / Relator

v.

Barack Hussein Obama (a/k/a Barry Soetoro) in esse

Defendant / Respondent-------------------------------------------------

QUO WARRANTO COMPLAINT WITH DEMAND FOR JURY TRIALAND DECISION ON QUESTION OF FIRST IMPRESSION

Plaintiff/Relator, Christopher-Earl : Strunk in esse, in the name of the united States of

America brings this Verified Complaint under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule (FRCvP)

81(a)(2) first offered for action by the District Attorney for the Washington District of

Columbia, with TITLE 16 CHAPTER 35 (Quo Warranto) OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CODE in its entirety (1) with allegations of usurpation of Office of the President and failure of

duty against Defendant / Respondent as follows:

1 Chapter 35 16-3501 Persons against whom issued; civil action. states: A quo warranto may be issuedfrom the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the name of the United States againsta person who within the District of Columbia usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises, afranchise conferred by the United States or a public office of the United States, civil or military. Theproceedings shall be deemed a civil action.Chapter 35 16-3502 states: The Attorney General of the United States or the United States attorney mayinstitute a proceeding pursuant to this subchapter on his own motion or on the relation of a third person . Chapter 35 16-3503 states: If the Attorney General or United States attorney refuses to institute a quowarranto proceeding on the request of a person interested, the interested person may apply to the court bycertified petition for leave to have the writ issued.Chapter 35 16-3544 states: In a quo warranto proceeding, the defendant may demur, plead specially, orplead not guilty as the general issue, and the United States or the District of Columbia, as the case maybe, may reply as in other actions of a civil character . Issues of fact shall be tried by a jury if either partyrequests it . Otherwise they shall be determined by the court.


136/181



1. This Complaint is to be heard with 28 USC 1345 in this particular District Court for the

District of Columbia that affords the proper venue under 28 USC 1391 (e) (2) for this action in

that Defendant in esse is usurping the Corporate office of the President of the united States of

America (POTUS) located within the District of Columbia and the failure of the Defendant in

esse to act in good faith with his corporate duty within the District of Columbia.

2. This Petition demands the Quo Warranto Act mandates this Court to create a jury trial to

determine the issue of facts: (i) where Defendant was born and (ii) whether or not both his

parents were united States Citizens at his birth; and thereafter a trial on the facts that the Court

as a matter of first impression must determine the law as to what is the natural-born-citizenrequirement of Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of the united States Constitution.

3. This action demands to compel Defendant to show cause why he should not by removed

from the POTUS office as a usurper for his ineligibility with Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 and the

25 th Amendment to the Constitution as applies to Article 2 Section 1 Clause 6.

4. In support of this verified complaint with two cause, Plaintiff avers the following:

5. Relator, Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse (hereinafter "Plaintiff", Relator), is an

individual who resides with place for service at 593 Vanderbilt Avenue #281 Brooklyn, NY

11238; Email: [email protected], SKYPE: cestrunk.

6. That Plaintiff is a natural-born citizen of New York with both Parents being citizens there

in the city of New York at the time of Plaintiffs birth, that both Parents were married, and also

natural-born citizens of the united States of America (USA).

7. That Plaintiff is eligible to become the President of the united States of America

(POTUS) unlike Defendant because I meet the three requirements of eligibility: be at least 35

years of age, 14 years resident of the USA and be a natural born citizen at birth.


137/181



8. That Plaintiff makes a special-appearance in this action without relinquishing sovereignty

and or any inalienable individual right.

9. In explanation, Plaintiffs Special-Appearance is as a Living-Soul Son-of-the Most-High-

God-Yahweh in existence nunc pro tunc the moment of Creation in Joint-Heir-with-His-Son

Made Debt-Free with the Yahshua Payment (consideration) of His Blood, in which Strunk

Stands in the Kingdom of the Most-High-God Yahweh, and that is under reserve, without

dishonor, without prejudice, without recourse in good faith, no dolus; and that this court and or

any temporal entity or person is unable to offer a higher consideration.

10. That Plaintiff has inalienable individual rights as described by the Declaration of

Independence of 1776 that pre-existed the creation of the united States Constitution.

11. That Plaintiff is the creator of the united States Constitution nunc pro tunc at the

moment of his Creation as an inheritance upon birth as a natural born-citizen.

12. That the Federal government is created by Plaintiffs sovereign authority to protect his

inalienable individual rights and to define express limited rights for government to operate by.

13. That Plaintiff authority creates the corporate office of the President of the united States of

America, POTUS, to which Defendant Barack Hussein Obama was questionably elected without

presenting eligibility proof of his qualifications other than his opinion he was somehow eligible.

14. That Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of the united States Constitution is controlling and

only requires three qualification be proven to be eligible for assuming the corporate office of the

Presidency, i.e. an applicant shall be 35 years of age, 14 years resident of united States of

America and a natural-born-citizen; this is a case of first impression about natural-born-citizen

15. Defendant, Barack Hussein Obama (a/k/a Barry Soetoro) is located for service in care of

the White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, D.C. 20500.


138/181


139/181



AS AND FOR THE FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION

(For Defendants default and Failure toReply to the return of contract further acts are void ab initio)

25. Plaintiff repeats each and every allegation contained in the above introduction and

paragraphs 1 through 24 with the same force and effect as though herein

Date post:	30-May-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	christopher-earl-strunk
View:	216 times
Download:	0 times

Registered Mail Service of Summons Petition for Writ with Exhibits and Intervention DCD 10-cv-00151

Documents