+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Regulating Pollution ppt

Regulating Pollution ppt

Date post: 28-Feb-2018
Category:
Upload: mashun-vs
View: 223 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 27

Transcript
  • 7/25/2019 Regulating Pollution ppt

    1/27

    REGULATINGPOLLUTION

    1.Picture source: http://i.ndtvimg.com/mt/2015-01/pollution_climate_AP_650_bigstr.!pg

    http://i.ndtvimg.com/mt/2015-01/pollution_climate_AP_650_bigstry.jpghttp://i.ndtvimg.com/mt/2015-01/pollution_climate_AP_650_bigstry.jpghttp://i.ndtvimg.com/mt/2015-01/pollution_climate_AP_650_bigstry.jpghttp://i.ndtvimg.com/mt/2015-01/pollution_climate_AP_650_bigstry.jpg
  • 7/25/2019 Regulating Pollution ppt

    2/27

    Rationale for Regulation

    "conomic #egulation: re$ers to government intein private actions o$ %rms and individuals

    &'o theories o$ regulation:

    Public (nterest &heor and (nterest )roup &heo

    Public (nterest &heor: main purpose o$ regulatithe promotion o$ public interest.

    (nterest )roup &heor: main purpose o$ regulatiopromotion o$ narro' interest o$ particular groupssociet such as individualindustries.

  • 7/25/2019 Regulating Pollution ppt

    3/27

    #ationale $or #egulation

    *a!or point o$ distinction bet'een these t'oapproaches is:

    Public (nterest &heor is a normative &heor +'

    see,s to eplain 'hat should happen in an idea

    'hile the (nterest )roup&heor is a positive th+'hich see,s to eplain 'h the 'orld 'or,s as

    does

  • 7/25/2019 Regulating Pollution ppt

    4/27

    nder Public (nterest &heor three general reasons !usti$government regulation

    a. (mper$ect competition/natural monopol

    b. (mper$ect in$ormation

    c. Public goods and bads

    (mper$ect competition/atural monopol

    &o control prices in order to protect the consumers and prevent cand restrict mergers that ma create ecessive mar,et po'er in thethe monopolists. (t ma guarantee a monopol to a particular %rm.

    (mper$ect in$ormation

    ands-o34 role: to establish a set o$ liabilit rules to encourage tprovision o$ sa$et-related ualit.

    irect intervention in the mar,et speci$ing acceptable levels o$

  • 7/25/2019 Regulating Pollution ppt

    5/27

    Public good and bads:Private mar,ets are ine7cient because o$ non-rivalr and nonecludabilit. )ovt. ma step in to directl provide these good e7cient levels8 eliminating the private mar,et. &his is $reuen'ith public goods +e.g8 national de$ense and rarel the case '

    bads. (n the case o$ public bads8 the usual approach is $or govde%ne a set o$ institutions and regulation to govern provision public bads8 e.g.8 the government establishes a set o$ regulatirestrict the production o$ pollution.

    (nterest )roup &heor o$ regulation maintains that resee,ingis the primar rationale $or regulation.

    #ent-see,ing involves private individuals or %rm using the govguarantee etra pro%ts +rent through government mandated on economic activit.

  • 7/25/2019 Regulating Pollution ppt

    6/27

    A Political Economy Model oRegulation

    &he basic problem o$ environmental regulation involves thgovernment tring to induce a polluter to ta,e sociall desactions8 'hich ostensibl are not in the best interest o$ the

    &he main problem8 there$ore8 is determination o$ eact levpollution'hich is best $or the societ.

    (n realit the government $aces pressures $rom consumerspolluters.

    9igure in the net page presents a highl stlied schematdiagram o$ the interactions among government8 polluting %consumer citiens.

  • 7/25/2019 Regulating Pollution ppt

    7/27

    FIGURE 1 ;chematic o$ interactions among government8 polluting %rms8 and consumer citiens.

  • 7/25/2019 Regulating Pollution ppt

    8/27

    )overnment

    &he )overnment as sho'n in %gure 18 consists o$ thbranches: the

  • 7/25/2019 Regulating Pollution ppt

    9/27

    &he 9irm

    &he %rm consists o$ several pieces:the @oard o$ irectors8 *anagers8 "mploees8 ;toc, aolders.

    &he @oard issues directives to the managers the manaissue directives to emploees 'ho produce the product%rm as 'ell as pollution.

    &he ,e point is that regulators direct the @oard to ta,eactions8 but the @oard is removed8 b several steps8 $roemploees 'ho actuall generate the pollution.

    ote that the %rm ma in?uence legislation through lob%nancial incentives.

  • 7/25/2019 Regulating Pollution ppt

    10/27

    &here arises Principal-agent problem due to inabthe regulator to completel control the polluter.

    &he %rm ma not be a passive entit but ma inin?uence legislation8 through lobbing or %nancincentives +sho'n b the line @

    &he third component o$ the %gure8 the consumevotes and other in?uence to the legislature +line'hile at the same time sending mone to the %rechange $or the goods consumed. &he consumgood as 'ell as the pollution.

  • 7/25/2019 Regulating Pollution ppt

    11/27

  • 7/25/2019 Regulating Pollution ppt

    12/27

    (nclusion o$

  • 7/25/2019 Regulating Pollution ppt

    13/27

    @A;(C #")

  • 7/25/2019 Regulating Pollution ppt

    14/27

    Command and Control can ta,eseveral $orms

    1. 9or eample the Clean Air Act4. Pollution controls and emission rates8 minimum pollution c

    per$ormance.

    9urther more8 the speci%c pollution control euipment recan be speci%ed or alternativel the regulation ma speci$emission limit $or particular tpes o$ plants and particular

    pollutants.2. Command and Control ma be combined 'ith signi%nes and penaltiesassociated 'ith noncompliance. &hho'ever8 di3ers $rom the economic incentives to abatpollution on t'o salient points.

  • 7/25/2019 Regulating Pollution ppt

    15/27

    2.a. #estricted choice $or the polluters as to 'hat meanused to achieve an appropriate environmental target

    2.b. A lac, o$ mechanism $or eualiing marginal contramong several di3erent polluters.

    E. &he best analog $or Command and Control is

    sstem o$ central planning +eisted in the $ormenion.

    o'ever ma!or problem o$ this is the enormousreuirement o$ in$ormation.

  • 7/25/2019 Regulating Pollution ppt

    16/27

    Advantages:

    a. *ore ?eibilit in regulating comple environmprocess and much greater certaint in ho' muchpollution 'ill result $rom regulations.

    b. (t simpli%es monitoring o$ compliance 'ith aregulation. +Chec, euipment.

  • 7/25/2019 Regulating Pollution ppt

    17/27

    isadvantages:

    a.&he regulator sstem ma be ver costlto administer asin$ormational costs are high. Polluter ma lie.

    b. (t ma reduce incentives to %nd better 'as to control poll

    c. i7cult in satis$ing the eui-marginal principle8 i.e. it is impossible $or command and control regulations to ensure thmarginal costs o$ pollution are eualied among di3erent pol

    generating the same pollution. +@B and

  • 7/25/2019 Regulating Pollution ppt

    18/27

    "conomic incentives provide re'ards $or pollute'hat is perceived to be in the public interest.

    &hree basic tpes o$ economic incentives includemar,etable permits and liabilit.

    Fees

    9ees involve the pament o$ charge per unit o$ pollutemitted. Fhen a polluter must pa $or ever unit o$ pemitted8 it becomes in the polluterGs interest to reducemission.

  • 7/25/2019 Regulating Pollution ppt

    19/27

    Mar!eta"le Permit A mar,etable permit allo's polluter to bu and sell th

    pollute. &rading induces a price or value on a permit tthus8 causing %rms to see polluting as an epensive a

  • 7/25/2019 Regulating Pollution ppt

    20/27

    Mar!eta"le Permit

    Assume a situation 'here t'o polluters eist andinterested in allo'ing 100 units o$ pollution in to

  • 7/25/2019 Regulating Pollution ppt

    21/27

    FIGURE # (llustration o$ permit trading $or t'o %rms. MS18 marginal savings $rom emitting8 %rm

    1 MS28 marginal savings $rom emitting8 %rm 2 eH8 euilibrium holding o$ permitsp*, euilibrium price

    permits.

  • 7/25/2019 Regulating Pollution ppt

    22/27

    Lia"ility

    &he basic idea is that i$ ou harm someone8 ou mcompensate that person $or damage.

  • 7/25/2019 Regulating Pollution ppt

    23/27

    Lia"ility

    @oth costs to dump and damage to societ are sas $unctions o$ the level o$ precaution.

    &he sociall desirable level o$ precaution isx*, athe marginal costs o$ ta,ing more precaution areo3set b the reduction in marginal damage $rommore precaution.

    ere8 negligence liabilit 'or,s in the sense thatthreat o$ being held responsible $rom accident dis o$ten a su7cient incentives $or %rms to ta,e thsociall desirable amount o$ precaution.

  • 7/25/2019 Regulating Pollution ppt

    24/27

    FIGURE $ An illustration o$ precaution and liabilit.

  • 7/25/2019 Regulating Pollution ppt

    25/27

    Ad%antages of EconomicIncenti%es

    Compared to the Command and Control *easure"conomic (ncentives has $ollo'ing advantages. 1. (n$ormational reuirements are less signi%cant

    2. "conomic incentives provide an incentive $or a polinnovate8 %nding cheaper 'as o$ controlling pollutio

    E. "conomic incentives involve the polluter paing $ocosts as 'ell as pollution damage. &here$ore8 there isimplicit subsid to the industr.

    J. 9or man economic incentives the eui-marginal pholds true.

  • 7/25/2019 Regulating Pollution ppt

    26/27

    &isad%antages of EconomicIncenti%es

    *a!or disadvantages o$ "conomic (ncentives are as 1. eveloping an economic incentive that e7cientl and

    ta,es compleities in environmental trans$ormation intocan be ver di7cult.

    2. )iven the political conditions8 it is ver di7cult to ad!level o$ incentives +level o$ $ee8 number o$ mar,etable p

    issued 'hen there is great deal o$ uncertaint associatethe environmental problem.

    E. ;ometimes (nstituting ta +on emission ma be ver as it involves trans$er o$ massive amount o$ 'ealth $romthe government.

  • 7/25/2019 Regulating Pollution ppt

    27/27

    #e$erences

    1. Picture 1: http://i.ndtvimg.com/mt/2015-01/pollution_climate_AP_650_bigstr.!pg

    http://i.ndtvimg.com/mt/2015-01/pollution_climate_AP_650_bigstry.jpghttp://i.ndtvimg.com/mt/2015-01/pollution_climate_AP_650_bigstry.jpg

Recommended