+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Regulation, Biology, and Control of the Gray Field Slug in ... · William E. Gavin, Gary Banowetz...

Regulation, Biology, and Control of the Gray Field Slug in ... · William E. Gavin, Gary Banowetz...

Date post: 03-Jul-2018
Category:
Upload: lekien
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
68
William E. Gavin, Gary Banowetz USDA ARS, National Forage Seed Production Research Center, Corvallis, Oregon 97331 Glenn C. Fisher, Amy Dreves, George Hoffmann Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331 Regulation, Biology, and Control of the Gray Field Slug in Western Oregon Agricultural Research Service Oregon State University
Transcript

William E. Gavin, Gary Banowetz

USDA ARS, National Forage Seed Production Research Center,

Corvallis, Oregon 97331

Glenn C. Fisher, Amy Dreves, George Hoffmann

Department of Crop and Soil Science,

Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331

Regulation, Biology, and Control of the

Gray Field Slug in Western Oregon

Agricultural

Research

Service

Oregon

State

University

Agricultural

Research

Service

Oregon

State

University

Introduction

Glenn Fisher

Registration of Metaldehyde

- Eligibility Decision

- Overview

- Sites, Crops, and Uses

- Cancellations

- IR-4 Program

- Use Patterns Allowed by EPA

- Significance of EPA Decision

Metaldehyde

• 1934 Molluscidal properties noted

• 1967 Lonza registered sole tech grade material in US

• End-use prod formulators

– OR_CAL,

– Corry’s

– Amvac

• Liquids, granules,

baits

• 50,000lbs ai/yr

• 11,000 on citrus

• 7,000 on artichokes

• 90% of use in OR,

WA, CA & HI

Metaldehyde Re-registration

Eligibility Decision (RED)

• 1996 FFDCA amended by FQPA

• EPA reassess all tolerances prior to ’96

– Exposure via non-work routes

– Women & Children

– Cumulative effects of same class pesticides

• RED completed, ‘07

• Metaldehyde products are currently labeled for many uses which are not being supported by the technical registrant.

• Crops/uses supported by Lonza

• turf/dichondra, ornamentals, citrus, lettuce, cole crops and other leafy greens, tomato, strawberry, berries (including blackberry, blueberry, currant, elderberry, gooseberry, raspberries), artichoke and grass grown for seed,

Crops & Uses that will be eliminated

from ’08 labels

Uses and crops

• Cereals

• Vegetable seed crops

• Sugar beet seed crop

• Legumes and seed

legumes

• Fallow land

• Possible action

• IR-4

• SLN

• SLN

• IR-4, SLN seed crop

• Label wording?

New Metaldehyde labels, ’08

Grass grown for seed*

• 0.8 lb ai/A (20 lbs 4% bait)

• 4 applications allowed per season

• 21 day interval between applications

• PHI

• * Residue profile, Tolerance establishment & Use

Pattern = IR-4 Program, Joe DeFrancesco

Significance of RED

• Slug problems will likely increase in those crops where metaldehyde use is eliminated.

• Identify cultural controls that may work in rotational crops

– Sheeping patterns in clover and grasses

• Greater reliance on one chemical produced by one supplier Iron Phosphate = Sluggo® by Neudorff for slug control

• Develop labels for cereals and clover hay crops- residue profile, tolerance & use pattern IR-4, Registrant, commodity group

• Submit SLNs (24c’s) in crops where feeding restriction can suffice

– Veg seed crops

– Sugar beet seed

– Clover seed

– Post-harvest, fallow land application

• Baits Crop or Site

• Grass Sd Clover Cereal fallow Application

• S F

• OR-CAL, meta 3.25% Y N N N N G

• OR_CAL, Slugfest new seed Y Y Y N G

• Liq before canopy

• closes

• WE 4 Bait Plus Y Y N Y N A or G

• AmVac

• Deadline MP’s Y Y Y Y Y A or G

• Or Bullets

• Durham 3.5 &

• 7.5 % Granules *** Y Y Y Y N G

• Do not mix w/ seeds

• Meta-rex Y Y Y Y Y A or G

• WFS

• Sluggo Y N N Y N A or G or Sluggo shorts

• Baits Crop or Site

• Grass Sd Clover Cereal fallow Application

• S F

• OR-CAL, meta 3.25% Y

• OR_CAL, Slugfest new seed

• Liq before canopy

• closes

• WE 4 Bait Plus Y

• AmVac

• Deadline MP’s Y

• Or Bullets

• Durham 3.5 &

• 7.5 % Granules *** Y

• Do not mix w/ seeds

• Meta-rex Y

• WFS Sluggo Y N N Y N A or G or Sluggo shorts

Why Do We Have The Highest

Populations Of Slugs In The World ?

Bill Gavin

1”

Variable in Color, Size, and Name!

Most Grass Damage Caused

by the Gray Field Slug

-Increased Earthworm Populations

-Increased Surface Residue

-Increased Soil Fertility

-Reduction in Harmful Chemicals

-Increased ARG Volunteer Seeded Acreage

-Shallower Depth in Tillage

-Field Burning Phase-Out

-Improved Field Drainage

-Increased Legume and Cereal Acreage

-Increased No-Till Acreage

-Increase in Grazing

-Bait Improvements

-Habitat Improvements for Predators

Positive For Slugs Negative For Slugs

Changes Have Benefited Slug Populations

Tillage Effects

Slug activity data based on four nights catch per month for the years 1992-2002, at sites in

Benton, Linn, and Marion counties ( Gavin, W.E., and J.J. Steiner, 1992-2002, unpublished data )

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul

num

ber

of

slugs

minimal tillage no-tillage

**

**

** **

**

** months with significant data

Agricultural

Research

Service

Oregon

State

University

Number of Egg Clutches

Average eggs per clutch 16.6 Average eggs per clutch 3.3

16

40

24

26

2423

12

32

8 8

4

8

4

8

0 0

Residue Effects

Fast and accurate method for estimating slug densities, W.E. Gavin, G.M. Banowetz, J.J. Steiner, S.M. Griffith, and

G.W. Mueller-Warrant, In: Seed Production Research, OSU, Ext/CrS 125, 4/06, pp 32-35.

0

25

50

75

100

125

150

175

200

225

250

275

300

August September October November December January February M arch April M ay June July

No

. of

Slu

gs

Tiled Field Un-Tiled Field

( Gavin, W.E., and J.J. Steiner, unpublished, 2005, from: 1992-2002 Cropping System Database)

Effects of Field Drainage on Slugs

Three Factors Affecting Control

- Weather

- Bait Performance

- Earthworm Activity

Eugene, Oregon

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

air

tem

per

ature

°F

0

50

100

150

200

250

rain

fall

mm

Three Factors Affecting Slug Biology

- Weather

- Tillage Practice

- Residue Management

- Field History

Eugene, Oregon

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

air

tem

per

ature

°F

0

50

100

150

200

250

rain

fall

mm

Eugene, Oregon

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

air

tem

per

ature

°F

0

50

100

150

200

250

rain

fall

mm

Weather

* *

*

*

* * *

* *

* *

*

*

*

* * *

Weather and Slugs: Oregon Perspective

London, England UK

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Jan

Feb

Mar

Ap

r

May Jun

Jul

Au

g

Sep

Oct

No

v

Dec

air

tem

per

ature

°F

0

50

100

150

200

250

rain

fall

mm

mean airT mean rainfall

Frankfurt, Germany

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90ai

r te

mper

ature

°F

0

50

100

150

200

250

rain

fall

mm

Paris, France

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

air

tem

per

atu

re °

F

0

50

100

150

200

250

rain

fall

mm

Dublin, Ireland

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

air

tem

per

atu

re °

F

0

50

100

150

200

250

rain

fall

mm

Istanbul, Turkey

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

air

tem

per

atu

re °

F

0

50

100

150

200

250

rain

fall

mm

mean airT mean rainfall

Bismarck, North Dakota

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

air

tem

per

atu

re °

F

0

50

100

150

200

250

rain

fall

mm

Albany, New York

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Jan

Feb

Mar

Ap

r

May Jun

Jul

Au

g

Sep

Oct

No

v

Dec

air

tem

per

atu

re °

F0

50

100

150

200

250

rain

fall

mm

mean airT mean rainfall

Baltimore, Maryland

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

air

tem

per

ature

°F

0

50

100

150

200

250

rain

fall

mm

Eugene, Oregon

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

air

tem

per

ature

°F

0

50

100

150

200

250

rain

fall

mm

Canberra, Australia

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90ai

r te

mper

atu

re °

F

0

50

100

150

200

250

rain

fall

mm

Christchurch, New Zealand

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

air

tem

per

ature

°F

0

50

100

150

200

250

rain

fall

mm

Wooster, Ohio

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

air

tem

per

atu

re °

F

0

50

100

150

200

250

rain

fall

mm

Climatological information is based on WMO Climatological Normals(CLINO) for the 30 -year period 1961 - 1990 , Weather Information Service, NOAA

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar April

% S

oil

Mo

istu

re0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Slu

g P

rese

nce

At

Dep

th (

inch

es)

soil moisture slugs

Greatest Number of

Slugs Available for

Poisoning

Unpublished data from a Woodburn soil-type, Hyslop Research Farm, 1996-1999. Location of average number of slugs found during excavation.

Agricultural

Research

Service

Oregon

State

University

November 30

Av

erage W

ater Tab

le Ht.

Av

erage W

ater Tab

le Ht.

October 30 December 30

Fewer Slugs Available During Early Baiting

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul

Rai

nfa

ll (

mm

)

40.0

45.0

50.0

55.0

60.0

65.0

70.0

75.0

80.0

So

il T

emp

erat

ure

(°F

)

0 -

4”

rainfall slugs soil T

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

Slug Activity Period Stimulated

By Falling Temperatures

Onset of Fall

Mating and

Egg Laying

Onset of Late

Winter Mating and

Egg Laying

Fall and Late Winter Eggs

Begin Hatching

Egg Laying Ends Slugs Become Less

Surface-Active

As Soil Temperatures

Rise and Soil Moisture Falls

Slug Activity 1992-2002 In Perennial Grasses:

Linn, Benton, and Marion Counties

Soil temperatures are average of max and min at 0-4 inches.

Earthworm Activity Period

Agricultural

Research

Service

Oregon

State

University

Data from 2006-2007.

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

11/1 11/7 11/14 11/29 12/1 12/7 12/14 12/28 1/1 1/7 1/14 1/28 2/1 2/7 2/14 2/28 3/1 3/7 3/14 3/28

Nu

mb

er o

f S

lug

s per

Wee

k

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Nu

mb

er o

f E

gg

Clu

tch

es

slugs eggs

Fall and Winter Eggs

Begin Hatching

Biology of the Gray Field Slug

in White Clover: Linn County 2006-07

Agricultural

Research

Service

Oregon

State

University

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

Slu

g W

eig

ht

(mg

)

class 1 class 2

Oct 15 Nov 1 Nov 15 Dec 1 Dec 15 Jan 1 Jan 15 Feb 1

Low Weight Gain During Winter:

Gray Field Slug In White Clover 2006

Juvenile Slugs (non-reproductive)

Adult Slugs (reproductive)

Agricultural

Research

Service

Oregon

State

University

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

slug w

eight

mg

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

nu

mb

er o

f eg

gs

per

slu

g

slug wt eggs per slug

Slug Size and Egg Laying

Agricultural

Research

Service

Oregon

State

University

Bait Performance

Bait Poisoning Difficult During Cool, Wet Weather

e. Less likely to consume same bait type

d. 30%-50% recovery after poisoning a. Deterioration begins on first day

b. Competes with other food sources

c. Adequate dosage must be consumed f. Competes for baits with earthworms

70°, 60°, 50°, 40°F

Day length adjusted

Dayton Soil

Pre-Conditioned 3wks

Food Present

Gray Field Slug

Food: Lettuce

70° 60° 50° 40° 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

% S

lug

Dea

th

Sluggo Deadline MP Durham 7.5 Control

Agricultural

Research

Service

Oregon

State

University

Control Problematic During

Cooler Temperatures

50°F

8hrL:16hrD

Dayton Soil

Pre-Conditioned 3wks

Recovery Time 3 weeks

Food Present

Gray Field Slug

Food: Lettuce

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Sluggo

22lbs/a

DMP

20lbs/a

Durham 7.5

15lbs/a 10 lbs/a

Mesurol

10lbs/a

Durham 7.5

7.5lbs/a

Durham 7.5

5lbs/a

MetaRex

12lbs/a

Control

% S

lug

Mo

rtal

ity

Durham 7.5

Bait Efficacy at 50°F

Agricultural

Research

Service

Oregon

State

University

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

DMP 8 lbs / A DMP 12 lbs / A DMP 16 lbs / A DMP 16-0 lbs / A

depleting

Seedling Survival Slug Death Egg Reduction

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

MetaRex 5 lbs / A MetaRex 7 lbs / A MetaRex 9 lbs / A MetaRex 9-0 lbs / A

depleting

Seedling Survival Slug Death Egg Reduction

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Sluggo 11 lbs / A Sluggo 16 lbs / A Sluggo 22 lbs / A Sluggo 22-0 lbs / A

depleting

Seedling Survival Slug Death Egg Reduction

Growth Chamber Studies

Demonstrating

Bait Efficacy at 50°F

% R

educt

ion f

rom

the

Contr

ol

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

SlugFest AWF 1.0 pts / A SlugFest AWF 2.0 pts / A SlugFest AWF 3.0 pts / A

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Durham 7.5 10 lbs / A Durham 7.5 20 lbs / A Durham 7.5 30 lbs / A

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

46-0-0 80

lbs/A uN

16-20-0-14 40

lbs/A uN

33-0-0-12.2S

80 lbs/A uN

Bordeaux

Mixture

Hot Pepper

Wax

Liquid Copper

Seedling Survival Slug Death Egg Reduction

Growth Chamber Studies

Demonstrating

Non-Bait Efficacy at 50°F

% R

educt

ion f

rom

the

Contr

ol

Agricultural

Research

Service

Oregon

State

University

Delayed Emergence After Freezing Temperatures

30.0

35.0

40.0

45.0

50.0

days of month

2"

soil

T °

F

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

slugs

per

nig

ht

soil T slugs

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1

Feb Mar

Treatment Ineffective During Freeze-Thaw Cycle

Freeze Slug “Thaw”

Data based on ten freeze-thaw cycles over two years. Freeze is interpreted as ground hard freeze at 2” depth.

Agricultural

Research

Service

Oregon

State

University

Earthworm Activity

Effect of Bait Type and Application Rate

0 1 2 3 4

Days

Days

Deadline MP

0

20

40

60

80

100%

bai

t re

moval 10 lbs/A 20 lbs/A 30 lbs/A

MetaRex

0

20

40

60

80

100

% b

ait

rem

ov

al 10 lbs/A 20 lbs/A 30 lbs/A

Sluggo

0

20

40

60

80

100

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

% b

ait

rem

ov

al

10 lbs/A 20 lbs/A 30 lbs/A

Agricultural

Research

Service

Oregon

State

University

Slug Activity 1992-2002 In Perennial Grasses:

Linn, Benton, and Marion Counties

Soil temperatures are average of max and min at 0-4 inches.

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul

Rai

nfa

ll (

mm

)

40.0

45.0

50.0

55.0

60.0

65.0

70.0

75.0

80.0

So

il T

emp

erat

ure

(°F

)

0 -

4”

rainfall slugs soil T

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

Slug Activity Period Stimulated

By Falling Temperatures

Onset of Fall

Mating and

Egg Laying

Onset of Late

Winter Mating and

Egg Laying

Fall and Late Winter Eggs

Begin Hatching

Egg Laying Ends Slugs Become Less

Surface-Active

As Soil Temperatures

Rise and Soil Moisture Falls

Earthworm Activity Period

Agricultural

Research

Service

Oregon

State

University

Late Winter Damage Impacts

Reproductive Tiller Production

Tiller Damage

Photo of tiller nursery here

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Slugs per Caged PRG Plants

Num

ber

of

Rep

roduct

ive

Til

lers

Control 2 4 6 8 10

*

27%

14% 13% 11% 5%

Percent Reduction

Agricultural

Research

Service

Oregon

State

University

Slug Density Per Caged Plant

Slugs Impact on Reproductive Tillers

Summary

Agricultural

Research

Service

Oregon

State

University

Slug Populations Are Influenced By:

Farming Practices

Tillage

Drainage

Residue

Weather

Movement

Location in the soil profile

Egg laying

Metabolism

Poison uptake and recovery

Earthworm Activity

Bait or Non-Bait Performance

Slug Management in No-Till Systems Glenn Fisher

Amy Dreves

- Overview

- Effects of Timing

- Effects of Bait and Non-Bait Types

- Monitoring for Slugs

- Interpreting Slug Population Numbers

Quantifying Slug Populations

Population Size/ Unit Area

• Absolute

• Allows Total Numbers of all

stages per sample unit

• specify depth sampled

• You have to count all stages

present!

• example: slugs/sq ft,

slugs/crown,

• slugs/6”core, depth of 4 inches

Absolute Population Measurement Slugs per 3, 6” Cores in Upper 4” of Soil

Feb 7, Feb 12

• Treatment PRE- GGS/3 cores 5 DAT

• 1) Durham 3.5% 14 12.3

• 2) Carbaryl 2F (Sevin) +Phor-ti-phy 4F 11.7 13.7

• 3) Slugfest 25% liquid Metadehyde 12.3 13

• 4) Slugfest + Carbaryl 2F (Sevin) 13.3 10.3

• 5)Metarex 4 (standard) 10.7 14.7

• 6)Untreated (Water only) 14 14

Quantifying Slug Populations

Population Size/ unit area

. . .

• slugs recorded @ an overnight bait station “slugs/station”

– often > 20/station PRG

• Number of slugs recorded under a shelter board or blanket

• Can provide quick & usually accurate way to compare effects of practices or controls.

Bait Stations

• Open Station:

– scrape to bare soil

– select a bait & an amount

– 3 pellets per bait station

• Set up in late afternoon – count all slug visitors before 8AM

the next day

– map & record numbers

– 3 to 5 slugs/bait station can mean problems to new seedings

• Pick your night carefully – avoid wind, extreme cold, driving

rain

. . .

Bait Stations Will Underestimate Slug Populations

During Cold or Windy Weather

Tall Fescue (Lexus) Lebanon, OR 1995

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

# o

f S

lug

s

19-Oct

26-Oct

3-Nov 17-Nov

Bale & Vacuum

Straight BladedFlail (2x)

Conventional Flail& Partial Rake

*

Effects of Annual Ryegrass Cropping

System On Slug Populations (Shedd, OR, 1996-1997)

_______________________________________________________

Cropping system Total

slugs/Bt Station

Plow + conv. seeding 2.9

Full Straw 0.7

Min-till, drill + sprout spray 22.4

Full straw 27.1

Volunteer crop……. 50.5

Full straw 56.2

__________________________________________

_____________

Evaluation of Weathered Baits November 2006

• 6 formulations, weathered

from 0 to 7 days,

• 144 bait stations

• Nov 15, 16, 17

• GGS collected each day

• Held for 6 days

Evaluation of Weathered Baits November 2006

Results

• 1.42 inches of rain

• 45.6°F daily mean

temp

• 34.8 to 56.5°F dmt

range

• mean wind of 5.1 mph

(ranging from 1.79 to

9.8mph).

• 6 days plot inspection,

T slugs ranged from 0

to 14/ plot !

• averaging ~6 slugs per

plot

• only 33% of slugs

collected in the arena

died

July Product Tests in White Clover (dew present at application)

Treatment

Trial 1

Mean No. of Mature Gray Garden Slugs per

2 blankets/plot*1

4D pre 2h post 1 DAT 2 DAT 3 DAT 9 DAT 10 DAT

7/6/07 7/10/07 7/11/07 7/12/07 7/13/07 7/19/07 7/20/07

Slugfest 32.7a 18.7a 2.0a 4.0a

1.7a

1.7a 3.0 a

Sluggo 18.0a 23.0a 33.0b 26.0 b 3.0 a 7.3ab 4.7 a

UTC 22.0a 30.7a 47.7 b 36.7 b 21.7 b 14.7 b 25.3 b

Meta-rex 26.7 a 26.7 a 40.0 b 44.7 b 24.7 b 10.0 b 12.0 ab

*1 Means (±SE) separated by Fishers LSD. Means with same letter are not significantly different.

• Avg GGS/3 bait St

• Treatment Rate PRE Tr 7 DAT

• Deadline MPs 8lb 19.3 4.0

• Deadline MPs 5.3 13.8 3.0

• Metarex 2.5 5.3 17.3 4.0

• Metarex 2.5 4.5 20.0 3.5

• Metarex 2.5 3.0 15.8 3.3

• Metarex 2.2 5.3 14.8 5.3ab

• Metarex 2.2 3.0 18.3 4.3ab

• UTC 13.5* 24.5 b

Control of the Gray Garden Slug

In Annual Ryegrass (March 2005)

• Avg GGS/3 bait St

• Treatment Rate 21 DAT 29 DAT

• Deadline MPs 8lb 3 5 a

• Deadline MPs 5.3 2 6.5a

• Metarex 2.5 5.3 2.8 7 ab

• Metarex 2.5 4.5 3.8 8.3ab

• Metarex 2.5 3.0 7 7.5ab

• Metarex 2.2 5.3 6.5 6.8ab

• Metarex 2.2 3.0 6.3 9.3ab

• UTC 23.3* 14.5 b

Control of the Gray Garden Slug

In Annual Ryegrass (March 2005)

Summary for Control of Slugs

in No-Till Systems

• Multiple applications needed

• Success is variable

• Weather, Bait Performance, and Earthworms

• Timing Critical

– September thru Early November

– March thru May

Insect Damage To Crops

Sometimes Attributed To Slugs

Glenn Fisher

Amy Dreves

• Overview

• Effects of Insects, Mites, Wireworms,

and Symphyllans on Grass Crops

• No-Till Systems

• Identifying the Damage

• Timing and Type of Control

Black Cutworm

Glassy cutworm

Black Cutworm

• Fall seedings

• Previous crop

– Sugar beet seed

– Pasture, grass

– Clover

– Vegetable seed

• Seedlings are missing,

clipped & wilted

• Larvae are under

clods, clumps at

moisture line in soil by

day

• Feed @ Night

Control is with broadcast spray of Lorsban, Baythroid or Mustang MAX.

Because they feed above ground at night, rain is not necessary,

but does boost control

Wireworms

Wireworms

• Present in soil at planting

• Clumped

• Larger seedlings turn yellow then white

• Look for wilting and off-color seedlings

• Screen soil, can be deep

• Control: no products are labeled

Garden Symphylan

• Missing seedlings, stunted

seedlings next to normal

• Rootlets are stubbed off.

• Screen moist soil early in

AM potato baits

• Control in rotational crop

w/ soil active product

Cranefly

Cranefly

• Early fall damage to new seedings thru Apr

• Screen soil

• Larvae feed above ground at night

• Kill seedlings, may feed on foliage from top

down as well as along side

• Easily controlled with low rates of Lorsban

Frit Fly

Frit fly

Frit Fly

• Fall and Spring damage to seedlings

• 2-6 leaf seedlings most susceptible

• Flies emerge and lay eggs after fall rains

• Another 1 or 2 gen in late winter, spring

• Turf, golf course pests

• Dimethoate or Lorsban when adults are

active in fall after rains

Seasonal Control Strategies

- Overview

- Developing an IPM Program for Slugs

- “Soft Model Concept”

Glenn Fisher

Amy Dreves

Bill Gavin

Glenn Fisher

Amy Dreves

Bill Gavin

George Hoffmann

Are We Asking The Right Questions:

Research for 2007-2009

National Forage Seed Production Research Center, USDA ARS

Gary Banowetz, Rick Caskey, Scott Culver, Steve Griffith, George Mueller-Warrant, and Sheila Seguin

Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University

Russ Karow, Mark Mellbye

Growers

Mike Berger, Nick Bowers, Mike Coon, Brian Glaser, Dennis Glaser, Kim and Kerwin Koos, Mark Macpherson,

Garth Mulkey, Dave Goracke, Don Worth, Harry Stalford, Telly Worth, George Pugh, Cody Younger

Western Farm Service, Tangent, Oregon

Bob Spinney, Bob Schroeder, Curt Dannen

OrCal Inc.

Tom Peterson

Wilbur-Ellis

Lance Kirk, Steve Silbernagle

Amvac

Rennie Kubick

Neudorff

Cam Wilson

Liphatec

Scott McCalley

Acknowledgements

Oregon

State

University

Agricultural

Research

Service


Recommended