Date post: | 31-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | johnathan-todd |
View: | 217 times |
Download: | 3 times |
Regulations that Protect Clean Water
Regulations that Protect Clean Water
Jocelyn Mullen, P.E.
Presented at
The Water Course
January 27, 2010Mesa County Water Association
90,46590,465square milessquare milesof estuariesof estuaries
41 million miles of 41 million miles of lakes, ponds, lakes, ponds, reservoirsreservoirs
3.6 million miles 3.6 million miles of rivers and of rivers and streamsstreams
100 million acres 100 million acres of wetlands in 48 of wetlands in 48 states (170-200 states (170-200 million in Alaska)million in Alaska)
66,64566,645 miles of miles of ocean shorelineocean shoreline
5,523 miles of 5,523 miles of Great Lakes Great Lakes shorelineshoreline
33,000 trillion 33,000 trillion gallons of ground gallons of ground waterwater
America’s Water Resources: A Large and Diverse PortfolioAmerica’s Water Resources: A Large and Diverse Portfolio
Discussion
• Why do we need regulations to keep water clean ?
• We all live downstream of something or somebody
Major Regulations:
• Federal Water Pollution Control Act and Amendments – Clean Water Act (CWA)
• Safe Drinking Water Act and Amendments – Underground Injection Control (UIC)
• Colorado Statutes and Regulations
Major uses of Water:
• Public Water Supply
• Agricultural Water Supply– Crop Irrigation
• Water-Based Recreation
• Commercial, Subsistence and Recreational Fishing
• Industrial Uses
• Aquatic Life and Wildlife
• Wildlife Dependent on Aquatic Food Chains
Threats to Surface and Ground WaterThreats to Surface and Ground Water
Natural causesManmade causes
Natural Impacts: Geological Activity Climate & Weather Fire Sediment erosion from upstream
Impacts from Agriculture:Effect of Agriculture on Stream
Hydrology and Chemistry
Impacts from Commerce and Industry:
Eroded road fromtimber harvesting
Metals leaching from mining
Commercial fishing
Industrial discharge
Manmade Impacts: Atmospheric Changes
Acid Deposition
Impacts from Land Use and Urbanization:
Aerial view of Washington, D.C.Time
Str
eam
Dis
char
ge
After
Before
Manmade Impacts:Invasive Species
Zebra mussel
Hydrilla
Nutria
Contaminants and Pollutants• Chemicals
– Organic– Inorganic– Disinfection byproducts
• Biological organisms– Pathogens– Invasive species
• Physical– Heat
Effects of Contamination
• Adverse health effects
• Ecological effects and costs
• Economic costs
• Aesthetic costs
Health Effects: Pathways of Exposure• Human routes
– Drinking water– Foods– Body contact
• Aquatic organisms– Respiration– Food
• Semi-aquatic wildlife– Food
Health Effects: Temporal Aspects• Duration
– Short term (acute)– Long term (chronic)
• Pattern– Constant or continuous– Intermittent
• Frequent• Infrequent
History of Water History of Water Regulation in theRegulation in the
United StatesUnited States
History of Water History of Water Regulation in theRegulation in the
United StatesUnited States
Pre-EPA History of Water Regulation
First-known treatment
First-known treatment
300 BCE300 BCE
Early 1800sEarly 1800s
Late 1800s - EarlyLate 1800s - Early1900s1900s
19701970Mid-1900sMid-1900s
Early recognition of water-disease link
Early recognition of water-disease link
Federal Water Pollution
Control Act, 1948, 1956,
1965
Federal Water Pollution
Control Act, 1948, 1956,
1965
Regulation as local
health issue
Regulation as local
health issue
Rivers and Harbors Act,
PHS standards
Rivers and Harbors Act,
PHS standardsEarly State
regulations
Early State regulations
EPA Established
• Water pollution control moved from Department of the Interior to EPA
• Drinking water program moved from Public Health Service to EPA
• Attempted resurrection of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899
Post-EPA History of Water Regulation
SDWA Amendments
SDWA Amendments
19701970
19771977 1996199619871987
Clean Water Act
Clean Water Act
CWA Amendments
CWA Amendments
FWPCA Amendments
FWPCA Amendments
19741974
19721972
19861986
Coastal Zone Coastal Zone Management ActManagement Act
Coastal Zone Coastal Zone Management ActManagement Act
Marine Protection, Marine Protection, Research and Research and
Sanctuaries ActSanctuaries Act
Marine Protection, Marine Protection, Research and Research and
Sanctuaries ActSanctuaries Act
Safe Drinking Water Act
Safe Drinking Water Act
SDWA Amendments
SDWA Amendments
19901990
Oil Pollution Act
Oil Pollution Act
Federal Water Federal Water Pollution Control Act Pollution Control Act AmendmentsAmendments
The Clean Water ActThe Clean Water Act
Federal Water Federal Water Pollution Control Act Pollution Control Act AmendmentsAmendments
The Clean Water ActThe Clean Water Act
FWPCA Amendments of 1972• States are primary implementers, with
EPA oversight
• No right to pollute navigable waters of the U.S.
• Enforceable permits with discharge limits for point sources
• Establishment of “technology-based” controls, backed by “water quality-based” controls
FWPCA Amendments of 1972• Greatly increased funding for municipal sewage
systems• Expanded requirements for WQS for all surface waters• Established permit issuance authority for point
sources• Strengthened enforcement authority, including
citizen suits
Key Term: Pollutant
• Dredged spoil, solid waste, incinerator residue, filter backwash, sewage sludge, munitions, chemical wastes, biological materials, some radioactive materials, heat, wrecked or discarded equipment, rock, sand, cellar dirt and industrial, municipal, and agricultural waste
CWA Section 502(6)
Point Source
• Any discernable, confined, discrete conveyance, including, but not limited to, any pipe, ditch, channel, tunnel, conduit, well, discrete fissure, rolling stock, concentrated animal feeding operation, some vessels, or other floating craft from which pollutants are or may be discharged
• Does not include return flows from irrigated agriculture
CWA Section 502(14)
FWPCA Goals
• "Restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the Nation's waters“
• "Water quality which provides for the protection and propagation of fish, shellfish, and wildlife and provides for recreation in and on the water" ((fishable/swimmable goal)fishable/swimmable goal)
Technology-Based vs. Water Quality-Based• Technology-based
– Source > Pollutant > (Waterbody)
• Water quality-based
– Waterbody > Pollutant > Source
1987 Water Quality Act
• State revolving fund• Water quality-based toxics controls• Sewage sludge (biosolids)
management• Storm water permits• Antidegradation policy• Nonpoint source programs• Treatment as a State for Tribes
CWA: Part I, Technology-Based• Point source discharges to
surface waters through NPDES permitting
• Generally-applicable limits
• Discharge limits determined by technical and economic feasibility within each industrial grouping
CWA: Part II, Water- Quality Based • Technology-based limits on existing and new
point sources still apply• Additional point source limits when WQS still
not met after tech-based level of treatment
• New limits driven by WQS• Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) consistent
with meeting WQS set, then allocated among sources
Program Implementation Framework
Hierarchy of Federal Governance
STATUTESSTATUTESCongress and PresidentCongress and President
SDWA, CWASDWA, CWA
REGULATIONSREGULATIONSEPAEPA
Rad Rule,Rad Rule, Effluent GuidelinesEffluent Guidelines
POLICY, GUIDANCE and GUIDELINESPOLICY, GUIDANCE and GUIDELINESEPAEPA
Capacity Development Guidance, BMP ManualsCapacity Development Guidance, BMP Manuals
EXECUTIVE EXECUTIVE ORDERSORDERSPresidentPresident
Hierarchy of State Governance
STATUTESSTATUTESState Legislature/AssemblyState Legislature/Assembly
WaterWater
REGULATIONSREGULATIONSState AgenciesState Agencies
PWS Rules, WQSPWS Rules, WQS
POLICY, GUIDANCE and GUIDELINESPOLICY, GUIDANCE and GUIDELINESState AgenciesState Agencies
Technical and Policy IssuesTechnical and Policy Issues
PrimacyPrimacyDelegationDelegationFrom EPAFrom EPA
EXECUTIVE EXECUTIVE ORDERSORDERSGovernorGovernor
Six Common Processes at State Level
• Primacy or authorization• Ambient Monitoring
• Setting technology- and risk-based standards
• Permitting
• Discharge Monitoring and Compliance Determinations
• Enforcement
Six Common Processes at State Level• Primacy or authorization
• Ambient Monitoring• Setting technology- and risk-based standards• Permitting• Discharge Monitoring and Compliance
Determinations• Enforcement
Monitoring and Reporting on the Condition of Water
Monitoring and Reporting on the Condition of Water
Why Monitor Water?
• Establish a baseline from which to track changes
• Detect potential problems
• Inform the public of actual problems
• Verify compliance
• Collect data on emerging contaminants of concern
• Determine program effectiveness
Where Is Water Monitored?• Ambient monitoring
• End of treatment processes
• Within treatment processes or distribution system
What Parameters Are Monitored?
• Chemical– Mostly numeric standards for contaminants or
other parameters
• Physical– Numeric (flow, temperature, habitat structure) or
narrative (objectionable color, aquatic habitat)
• Biological– Numeric (indices of biological integrity, fecal
coliform concentrations, chlorophyll a) or narrative (support populations of fish and shellfish)
Water Quality Reports
• §305(b) - National Water Quality Inventory
• §303(d) - Threatened and Impaired Waters List
• Colorado Regulation 93 - Section 303(d) List Water-Quality-Limited Segments Requiring TMDLS (amended 3/11/08, effective 4/30/08) http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/regulations/wqccregs/100293wqlimitedsegtmdls.pdf
CO Waters Assessed 2008Waterbody Quantity Supports SupportsType Assessed all uses 1 use Impaired Rivers 230,000 mi 41,000 19,480 12,800 17.8% 8.5% 5.6%
Lakes 313,000 ac. 35,270 15,268 43,000 11.3% 4.9% 13.7%
Colorado’s 303(d) list Waters
0 5 10 15 20 25
1
3
5
7Industrial Point Sources
Removal of Streamside Veg.
Urban Runoff/Storm Sewers
Resource Extraction
Habitat Modification
Municipal Point Sources
Agriculture
US Leading Sources/StressorsUS Leading Sources/Stressors
33
33
55
55
55
55
2525
Percent of US Surveyed River MilesPercent of US Surveyed River Miles
AgricultureAgriculture25%25%AgricultureAgriculture25%25%
Surveyed %Surveyed %
Six Common Processes at State Level• Primacy or authorization• Ambient Monitoring
• Setting technology- and risk-based standards
• Permitting• Discharge Monitoring and Compliance
eterminations• Enforcement
Setting National Standards:Health Effects Considerations
• Adverse health effects from acute exposure
• Adverse health effects from chronic exposure
TimeTime
Con
cen
trat
ion
Con
cen
trat
ion
AcuteAcute
Chronic
Chronic
Identifying Adverse Health Effects• Two categories of adverse health
effects– Cancer– Non-cancer
• Toxic effects vary with the magnitude (concentration), duration and frequency of exposure
Risk-Based Analyses
• Risk analysis to support standard-setting– CWA addresses human health and ecological risks
• Analysts estimate risks from various exposure scenarios– Toxicology experiments– Epidemiology studies
Water Quality Standards
• Must address all surface waters (i.e., waters of US and State)
• Key elements– Designated uses– Water quality criteria (conditions supporting
DUs)– Antidegradation
• Optional provisions (e.g., exemptions)
WQS: Key Definitions
• Designated useDesignated use - Expression in WQS of a use of a specific waterbody that should be attained, regardless of current use
• Existing useExisting use - Any use that has been attained or has occurred in a waterbody since November 1975
• DowngradingDowngrading - Changing a designated use from a “higher” (more sensitive) use to a “lower” one
• UpgradingUpgrading - Changing the designated use from a “lower” to a “higher” one
WQS: Designated Use Categories• Drinking water
– Treated or untreated• Human contact
– Noncontact, secondary, primary• Fishing and eating • Aquatic life
– Warmwater species and habitat– Coldwater species and habitat
• Agriculture water supply• Industrial water supply
WQS: Use Classifications
WQS: Designating WaterbodiesThe General Rules• Must designate all “existing” uses• Fishable/swimmable required, with rare
exceptions• Waste transport not OK• Multiple uses OK; “most sensitive use reigns”• Can consider economic factors• Must not preclude attainment of downstream
WQS
Colorado Procedures for Assigning or Changing Classifications
(a) General • (i) Assigning or changing a classification shall be accomplished by rule after a rulemaking hearing. Rulemaking hearings to consider a classification will be conducted according to the Procedural Regulations of the Commission.
At a minimum, the Commission shall review classifications once every three years.
Any interested person have shall have the right to petition the Commission to assign or change a stream classification.
Such petition shall be open to the public inspection.
Procedures for Assigning or Changing Classifications (Cont’d)
WQS: Water Quality Criteria (WQC)• Consistent scientificallyscientifically with protecting all
designated uses• Basic types of criteria
– Narrative, numeric– Water column, sediment, fish tissue
• Categories of criteria– Aquatic life
• Pollutant-specific and aquatic community indices
– Human health (drinking, fish consumption)– Wildlife (semiaquatic, food chain effects)
WQS: Narrative Criteria• Waters must be free from:
– Putrescent or otherwise objectionable bottom deposits
– Oil, scum, and floating debris in amounts that are unsightly
– Nuisance levels of odor, color, or other conditions– Undesirable or nuisance aquatic life– Substances in amounts toxic to humans or aquatic
life• Usually apply to all waters, regardless of use
designation
WQS: Numeric Criteria
• Parameter-specific: dissolved oxygen (DO), temperature, turbidity, N, P, Cu, dioxin– Level or concentration: 1 mg/L, 5 mg/kg– Duration
• Acute: instantaneous, 1-hour, 1-day• Chronic: 4-day, 7-day, 30-day
– Recurrence interval: 1 year, 3 years
Ammonia Criteria: Chronic
Note: varies with pH, too!
Temperature
(pH = 7.5)
Designated Use
Aquatic life Support
5 ºC 7 mg/L
15 ºC 4 mg/L
25 ºC 2 mg/L
WQS: Biological Criteria• Applicable to aquatic life, not human health• Require field sampling and studies• Fish, macroinvertebrates, plants
– Number of individuals, species, categories– Mass of species, feeding guilds, trophic levels– Specialists versus generalists– Tolerant verses intolerant
• Compare conditions at study site with relatively unimpacted reference site
WQS Exemptions: Spatial• Mixing zones
– Limited portions of a waterbody where WQS are waived
– Applies in outfall areas of some point sources– Chronic criteria waived, usually not acute– Size varies from site to site, but zone of passage
for organisms usually required– Often prohibited in critical habitat areas
What do you know about limits on mixing zone size that have been used by States? What are critical areas where one might prohibit mixing zones?
Regulatory Mixing Zone